Standard goniometry is the most commonly used method of assessing range of motion (ROM) in patients with burn scar contracture. However, standard goniometry disregards the cutaneous biomechanical influence between adjacent joint positions and skin (or scar) pliability to accommodate motion. Given that natural skin is a single, continuous piece of tissue enveloping the entire body without joints, the appropriateness of standard goniometry to quantify motion when burn scars or other integumentary impairments are the source of limitation, is called into question. We conducted a prospective, multi-center, comparative study investigating the difference between two goniometric protocols for measuring ROM outcome in burn survivors: 1) standard goniometry - based on arthrokinematics and 2) revised goniometry - based on principles of cutaneokinematics and functional positions. Maximal active ROM was measured for 11 motions, three times in each position in random order. Data were summarized using means and standard deviations and analyzed using a mixed model ANOVA with each subject representing a random effect in the model. Pearson’s Correlations were performed between the severity of limitation and the percentage of scar involvement. Data were collected for 174 joints from 66 subjects at seven different burn centers, resulting in a total of 1044 goniometric measurements for comparison. ROM findings using the revised goniometric protocol demonstrated significantly more limitation in motion 38.8 %±15.2% than the standard goniometric protocol 32.1% ±13.4% (p<.0001). Individual analyses of the motions likewise, showed significantly more limitation with the revised methods compared to the standard methods for 9/11 motions. Pearson’s correlation showed a significant positive correlation between the percentage of area affected by scarring and ROM outcome with revised goniometry (R2=.05, p=.0008) and the Δ between the revised and standard protocols (R2=.04, p=.0025) but no correlation was found with standard goniometry (R2=.015, p=.065). These findings support the notion that standard goniometry underestimates the ROM impairment for individuals whose motion is limited by burn scars. Due to the high frequency of movement related problems that burn survivors experience, ROM is a foundational outcome measure. It is used as a marker of recovery, influences function, affects quality of life and contributes to the decision of resource allocation during recovery. Therefore, having measurement methods that consider the unique characteristics of skin impairment is an important priority for both clinical reporting and future research in burn care. Clinical change in fundamental methods of measuring ROM after burn injury.
Read full abstract