Previous articleNext article No AccessArticlesInterest Groups in the USSR: The Impact of Political Sensitivity on Group InfluenceDonald R. KelleyDonald R. Kelley Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 34, Number 3Aug., 1972 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2129285 Views: 12Total views on this site Citations: 17Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1972 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Xiaobo Lü, Mingxing Liu, Feiyue Li Policy Coalition Building in an Authoritarian Legislature: Evidence From China’s National Assemblies (1983-2007), Comparative Political Studies 53, no.99 (Sep 2018): 1380–1416.https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018797950George Breslauer In Defense of Sovietology, Post-Soviet Affairs 8, no.33 (May 2013): 197–238.https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.1992.10641352Alan R. Ball, Frances Millard Problems of Pressure Group Analysis, (Jan 1986): 33–56.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18257-2_2H. Gordon Skilling Interest Groups and Communist Politics Revisited, World Politics 36, no.11 (Jun 2011): 1–27.https://doi.org/10.2307/2010173Lester Ross Flood Control Policy in China: The Policy Consequences of Natural Disasters, Journal of Public Policy 3, no.22 (Nov 2008): 209–231.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00006607Peter Vanneman, W. Martin James The role of opinion groups in the Soviet African policy process, Journal of Contemporary African Studies 2, no.22 (Sep 2007): 211–237.https://doi.org/10.1080/02589008308729406Sharon L. Wolchik The Scientific—Technological Revolution and the Role of Specialist Elites in Policy-making in Czechoslovakia, (Jan 1983): 111–132.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17251-1_5MICHAEL O'KEEFE, PAUL D. SCHUMAKER Protest Effectiveness in Southeast Asia, American Behavioral Scientist 26, no.33 (Jul 2016): 375–394.https://doi.org/10.1177/000276483026003007Karen Dawisha The limits of the bureaucratic politics model: Observations on the soviet case, Studies in Comparative Communism 13, no.44 (Dec 1980): 300–326.https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3592(80)90002-2Alexander J. Groth USSR: Pluralist Monolith?, British Journal of Political Science 9, no.44 (Jan 2009): 445–464.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400001927Joel Glassman The Political Experience of Primary School Teachers in the People's Republic of China, Comparative Education 15, no.22 (Jul 2006): 159–173.https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006790150205Valerie Bunce, John M. Echols From soviet studies to comparative politics: The unfinished revolution, Soviet Studies 31, no.11 (Nov 2007): 43–55.https://doi.org/10.1080/09668137908411223James B. Bruce, Robert W. Clawson A Zonal Analysis Model for Comparative Politics: A Partial Soviet Application, World Politics 29, no.22 (Jul 2011): 177–215.https://doi.org/10.2307/2010090Theodore H. Friedgut Interests and groups in Soviet policy‐making: The MTS reforms, Soviet Studies 28, no.44 (Nov 2007): 524–547.https://doi.org/10.1080/09668137608411089Donald R. Kelley Environmental policy‐making in the USSR: The role of industrial and environmental interest groups, Soviet Studies 28, no.44 (Nov 2007): 570–589.https://doi.org/10.1080/09668137608411091Donald R. Kelley Toward a Model of Soviet Decision Making: A Research Note, American Political Science Review 68, no.22 (Aug 2014): 701–706.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400117484Donald R. Kelley Toward a Model of Soviet Decision Making: A Research Note, American Political Science Review 68, no.22 (Aug 2014): 701–706.https://doi.org/10.2307/1959514
Read full abstract