Bureau International Des Poids Et Mesures Key Comparison Database Research Articles

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K5 of the air-kerma standards of the BEV, Austria and the BIPM in 137Cs gamma radiation

Main textA new comparison of the standards for air kerma of the Bundesamt für Eich- und Vermessungswesen (BEV), Austria, and of the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was carried out in the 137Cs radiation beam using the radiation protection facility of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Seibersdof, Austria in April 2023. The comparison was done using the BEV and the BIPM primary standards and a transfer instrument belonging to the BEV. The direct comparison result, evaluated as a ratio of the BEV and the BIPM standards for air kerma, is 1.0043 with a combined standard uncertainty of 2.7 parts in 103. The result for the indirect comparison is in agreement with the direct result at the level of 3 parts in 104. The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database, to update the 2009 comparison result.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K5 of the air-kerma standards of the CIEMAT, Spain and the BIPM in 137Cs gamma radiation

Main textA first comparison of the standards for air kerma of the Laboratorio de Metrología de Radiaciones Ionizantes - Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (LMRI-CIEMAT), Spain, and of the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was carried out in the 137Cs radiation beam using the radiation protection facility of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Seibersdorf, Austria, in September 2023. The comparison was done using the CIEMAT and the BIPM primary standards and a transfer instrument belonging to the CIEMAT. The direct comparison result, evaluated as a ratio of the CIEMAT and the BIPM standards for air kerma, is 0.9992 with a combined standard uncertainty of 2.2 parts in 103. The result for the indirect comparison is in agreement with the direct result at the level of 2.2 parts in 103. The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database, to update the 2014 APMP comparison result.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with NMC-A*STAR, July 2022

Main textAs part of the ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, a comparison has been performed between the ozone national standard of Singapore maintained by the National Metrology Centre, A*STAR (NMC, A*STAR) and the common reference standard of the key comparison, maintained by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), via a transfer standard maintained by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The instruments have been compared over a nominal ozone amount-of-substance fraction range of 0 nmol/mol to 500 nmol/mol.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with NIM, Oct 2023

Main textAs part of the ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, a comparison has been performed between the ozone national standard of China maintained by the National Institute of Metrology (NIM) and the common reference standard of the key comparison, maintained by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The instruments have been compared over a nominal ozone amount fraction range of 0 nmol mol−1 to 500 nmol mol−1.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Update of the BIPM comparison BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Lu-177 of activity measurements of the radionuclide 177Lu to include the 2023 result of the CMI (Czechia)

Main textSince 2000, 8 laboratories have submitted 8 samples of 177Lu to the International Reference System (SIR) for activity comparison at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), with comparison identifier BIPM.RI(II)- K1.Lu-177. Recently, the CMI (Czechia) participated in the comparison. The degrees of equivalence between each equivalent activity measured in the SIR or linked to the SIR from the CCRI(II)-K2.Lu-177 comparison have been calculated and the results are given in the form of a table. A graphical representation is also given.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Update of the BIPM comparison BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Zn-65 of activity measurements of the radionuclide 65Zn to include the 2015 result of the LNMRI-IRD (Brazil) and the 2018 result of the LNE-LNHB (France)

Main textSince 1977, 19 laboratories have submitted 22 samples of 65Zn to the International Reference System (SIR) for activity comparison at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), with comparison identifier BIPM.RI(II)- K1.Zn-65. The LNMRI-IRD (Brazil) and the LNE-LNHB (France) are the latest participants in the comparison and the key comparison reference value (KCRV) has been updated. The degrees of equivalence between each equivalent activity measured in the SIR and the updated KCRV have been calculated and the results are given in the form of a table. A graphical representation is also given.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Subsequent bilateral key comparison study - organic solvent calibration solution - gravimetric preparation and value assignment of aflatoxin B1 (AfB1) in acetonitrile (ACN)

Main textThe original CCQM-K154.b comparison was coordinated by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) and the Chinese National Institute of Metrology (NIM) on behalf of the Organic Analysis Working Group (OAWG) of the Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière (CCQM) for National Measurement Institutes (NMIs) and Designated Institutes (DIs) which provide measurement services in organic analysis under the 'Comité International des Poids et Mesures' Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA) and/or have participated in the BIPM's Mycotoxin Metrology Capacity Building and Knowledge Transfer (MMCBKT) project as part of its "Metrology for Safe Food and Feed in Developing Economies" Capacity Building Programme.Gravimetrically-prepared solutions having an assigned mass fraction of specified organic analytes are routinely used to calibrate measurement processes for the quantification of the same analytes in matrix samples. Appropriate assignments of the property value and associated uncertainty of calibration solutions thus underpin the traceability of routine analysis and are critical for accurate measurements. Evidence of successful participation in relevant international comparisons is needed to document calibration and measurement capability claims (CMCs) made by national metrology institutes and designated institutes. In total, eleven NMIs/DIs participated in the Track C, Model II, Key Comparison CCQM-K154.b [Gravimetric preparation and value assignment of aflatoxin B1 (AfB1) in acetonitrile (ACN)] for emerging areas of global interest and innovation. Participants were requested to gravimetrically prepare calibration solutions and value assign the mass fractions, expressed in mg/kg, of aflatoxin B1 (AfB1) in the acetonitrile (ACN) solution. Study samples, with assigned values and associated uncertainties were prepared by the comparison participants and sent to the coordinating laboratory for comparison. The Key Comparison Reference Values (KCRVs), calculated form values measured by the coordinating laboratory based on calibrations obtained from independent gravimetrically prepared calibrant solutions, agreed with participants reported values, within their stated uncertainties.AfB1 was selected to be representative of polar aflatoxins. Aflatoxins are a class of mycotoxins generally produced by fungi of the genus Aspergillus. It was anticipated to provide a challenge representative for the gravimetrical preparation and value assignment of calibration solutions in the mass fraction range of 2 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg of mycotoxins with broadly similar structural characteristics.In the original study CCQM-K154.b, nine participants of the MMCBKT programme were provided with a stock solution having a known AfB1 mass fraction and expanded uncertainty to use to gravimetrically prepare and value assign a calibration solution. Three NMIs/DIs also participated using their own calibration solutions. The use of in-house solutions required anadditional capacity to undertake a fit-for-purpose purity assessment. NIM was the only NMI participating using both the MMCBKT based and their own in-house assigned solutions in order to connect the two different groups.It was decided to propose separate KCRVs for each of the two ampoules provided by the participating NMIs/DIs based on the AfB1 mass fraction. This allowed participants to demonstrate the efficacy of their implementation of the approaches used to gravimetrically prepare calibrations solutions and to assess the AfB1 mass fraction.The majority of the AfB1 mass fraction KCRVs (wKCRV) for CCQM-K154.b spanned a mass fraction range of 2.02 mg/kg to 31.57 mg/kg. The relative expanded uncertainties U(wKCRV) ranged from 0.69 % to 2.93 %. Inspection of the degree of equivalence plots for the AfB1 mass fraction assignments in CCQM-K154.b indicated that there was an excellent agreement of results. Solely, the AfB1 mass fraction assignments of the INRAP (Institut National de Recherche et d'Analyse Physico-Chimique, Tunisia) did not agree with the KCRVs. It was found that the samples were altered as a result of an acid contamination.The INRAP has produced a new batch of AfB1 calibration solution using the AfB1 stock solution originally provided to MMCBKT participants to be able to demonstrate the efficacy of their implementation of the approaches used to gravimetrically prepare calibrations solutions and to assess the AfB1 mass fraction. The BIPM organized the present subsequent bilateral comparison CCQM-K154.b.1 to assess the new batch of AfB1 calibration solution of the INRAP. Inspection of the degree of equivalence plots for the AfB1 mass fraction assignments indicated that there is an excellent agreement of the INRAP results for CCQM-K154.b.1.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Update of the BIPM comparison BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Ge-68 of activity measurements of the radionuclide 68Ge to include the 2021 result of the NIM (China)

Main textSince 2013, 6 laboratories have submitted 7 samples of 68Ge to the International Reference System (SIR) for activity comparison at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), with comparison identifier BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Ge-68. Recently, the NIM (China) participated in the comparison and the key comparison reference value (KCRV) has been updated. The degrees of equivalencebetween each equivalent activity measured in the SIR or linked to the SIR from the CCRI(II)-K2.Ge-68 comparison and the updated KCRV have been calculated and the results are given in the form of a table. A graphical representation is also given.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with FMI, March 2023

Main textAs part of the ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, a comparison has been performed between the ozone national standard of Finland, maintained by the Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI) and the common reference standard of the key comparison, maintained by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The instruments have been compared over a nominal ozone amount fraction range of 0 nmol mol-1 to 500 nmol mol-1.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with EMPA, June 2023

Main textAs part of the ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, a comparison has been performed between the ozone standard of the World Meteorological Organization maintained by the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (EMPA) and the common reference standard of the key comparison, maintained by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The instruments have been compared over a nominal ozone amount fraction range of 0 nmol mol−1 to 500 nmol mol−1.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Update of the BIPM comparison BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Co-57 of activity measurements of the radionuclide 57Co to include the 2023 result of the BEV (Austria)

Main textSince 1976, 20 laboratories have submitted 59 samples of 57Co to the International Reference System (SIR) for activity comparison at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), with comparison identifier BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Co-57. Recently, the BEV (Austria) participated in the comparison. The degrees of equivalence between each equivalent activity measured in the SIR or linked to the SIR from the CCRI(II)-S6.Co-57 comparison have been calculated and the results are given in the form of a table. A graphical representation is also given.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K8 of high dose-rate 192Ir brachytherapy standards for reference air kerma rate of the PTB and the BIPM

Main textAn indirect comparison of the standards for reference air kerma rate for 192Ir high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy sources of the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Germany, and of the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was carried out at the PTB in May 2023. The comparison result, based on the calibration coefficients for a transfer standard and expressed as a ratio of the PTB and the BIPM standards for reference air kerma rate, is 1.0022 with a combined standard uncertainty of 0.0101.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Update of the BIPM comparison BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Ga-67 of activity measurements of the radionuclide 67Ga to include the 2023 result of the CMI (Czechia)

Main text Since 1978, 10 laboratories have submitted 18 samples of 67Ga to the International Reference System (SIR) for activity comparison at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), with comparison identifier BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Ga-67. Recently, the CMI (Czechia) participated in the comparison and the key comparison reference value (KCRV) has been fully revised. The degrees of equivalence between each equivalent activity measured in the SIR and the updated KCRV have been calculated and the results are given in the form of a table. A graphical representation is also given. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K8 of high dose-rate 192Ir brachytherapy standards for reference air kerma rate of the VSL and the BIPM

Main textA new key comparison of the standards for reference air kerma rate for 192Ir high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy sources of the Dutch Metrology Institute (VSL), The Netherlands, and the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was carried out at the VSL in May 2019. The comparison result, based on the calibration coefficients for a transfer standard and expressed as a ratio of the VSL and the BIPM standards for reference air kerma rate, is 0.9926 with a combined standard uncertainty of 0.0055.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Update of the BIPM comparison BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Tb-161 of activity measurements of the radionuclide 161Tb to include the 2022 result of the NPL (United Kingdom)

Main textSince 2019, 2 laboratories have submitted 2 samples of 161Tb to the International Reference System (SIR) for activity comparison at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), with comparison identifier BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Tb-161. Recently, the NPL (United Kingdom) participated in the comparison and the key comparison reference value (KCRV) has been evaluated for the first time. The degrees of equivalence between each equivalent activity measured in the SIR and the updated KCRV have been calculated and the results are given in the form of a table. A graphical representation is also given.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with NPL, June 2022

Main textAs part of the ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, a comparison has been performed between the ozone national standard of United Kingdom maintained by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) and the common reference standard of the key comparison, maintained by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The instruments have been compared over a nominal ozone amount fraction range of 0 nmol mol−1 to 500 nmol mol−1.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with CMS/ITRI, March 2024

Main textAs part of the ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, a comparison has been performed between the ozone standard of Chinese Taipei maintained by the Industrial Technology Research Institute/Center for Measurement Standards (CMS/ITRI) and the common reference standard of the key comparison, maintained by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The instruments have been compared over a nominal ozone amount fraction range of 0 nmol mol−1 to 500 nmol mol−1.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with VSL, April 2024

Main textAs part of the ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, a comparison has been performed between the ozone standard of the Netherlands maintained by the Van Swinden Laboratorium (VSL) and the common reference standard of the key comparison, maintained by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The instruments have been compared over a nominal ozone amount fraction range of 0 nmol mol−1 to 500 nmol mol−1.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K4 of the absorbed dose to water standards of the BFKH, Hungary and the BIPM in 60Co gamma radiation

Main textA new key comparison of the standards for absorbed dose to water of the Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala (BFKH), Hungary, and the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was carried out in the 60Co radiation beam of the BIPM in October 2021. The comparison result, based on the calibration coefficient for a transfer chamber and evaluated as a ratio of the BFKH and the BIPM standards for absorbed dose to water, is 0.9965 with a combined standard uncertainty of 4.5 parts in 103. The result agrees within the uncertainties with the comparison carried out in 2002. The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database KCDB.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Update of the BIPM comparison BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Na-22 of activity measurements of the radionuclide 22Na to include the 2022 result of the NMISA (South Africa)

Main textSince 1976, 13 laboratories have submitted 30 samples of 22Na to the International Reference System (SIR) for activity comparison at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), with comparison identifier BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Na-22. Recently, the NMISA (South Africa) participated in the comparison and the key comparison reference value (KCRV) has been updated. The degrees of equivalence between each equivalent activity measured in the SIR and the updated KCRV have been calculated and the results are given in the form of a table. A graphical representation is also given.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).