Bulk-fill Restorations Research Articles

Clinical Outcomes of Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations: A 10-Year Mapping Review and Evidence Gap Map.

To map the evidence regarding the clinical performance of posterior restorations with bulk-fill resin composites and identify research gaps. This mapping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews, and its protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework platform. Systematic searches were conducted, considering studies published between 2013 and February 2024 in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Clinical studies investigating the performance of bulk-fill resin composite restorations in class I and/or class II preparations with increments of 4 to 5 mm were included. A total of 147 articles were identified, and based on the eligibility criteria, 26 studies were selected for descriptive analysis. Of the reviewed studies, 73% (n = 19) investigated high-viscosity bulk-fill composites, while 30% (n = 8) focused on low-viscosity bulk-fill composites. Evaluation periods ranged from 1 week to 10 years. Reported annual failure rates varied from 0% to 3%, with survival rates between 78.9% and 100%. Bulk-fill resin composites of high viscosity were the most analyzed in the published studies, with evaluation periods of up to 10 years. The review of available scientific evidence showed clinically acceptable performance for composite bulk-fill restorations, with high survival rates and minimal annual failure rates. There is a need for long-term clinical studies on bulk-fill resin composites. This review demonstrates that both high and low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites exhibit satisfactory clinical performance, which can help clinicians optimize chairside time. However, it is important to highlight the need for further studies with longer follow-up periods.

Comparison of Water Sorption and Water Solubility Properties of Current Restorative Materials with Different Contents.

This study aimed to investigate and compare water sorption and solubility properties of current restorative materials with different contents. Alkasite, self-adhesive restorative material (Cention N, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein), bulk-fill glass hybrid restorative material (EQUIA Forte HT, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan), nanohybrid universal composite material (OptiShade, Kerr Dental, United States), and bulk-fill composite material (Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States) were used. Samples (n = 6) were prepared (2 × 10 mm) according to the ISO 4049 standards. Water sorption and solubility values were calculated according to the ISO 4049 standards. One-way ANOVA, Tukey's post-hoc, Tamhane's T2 post-hoc, Pearson's correlation, and independent samples t-tests were used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05). Group EQUIA Forte HT significantly showed the highest water sorption values (57.278 ± 3.174), while Group Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative exhibited the lowest (4.429 ± 0.174; p < 0.05). The water sorption values for Group Cention N were 5.000 ± 0.542. Group EQUIA Forte HT significantly had the lowest water solubility values (-99.799 ± 1.909), while Group Cention N (-2.966 ± 0.402) significantly exhibited the highest (p < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between water sorption and solubility values for each material (p > 0.05). The bulk-fill nano-filled composite resin material was successful in terms of water sorption while the bulk-fill glass hybrid restorative system in terms of water solubility. Alkasite can be recommended to be used as a base material due to its high solubility feature. Monomer, filler type, and amount had an impact on the water sorption and solubility properties of the tested materials.

Comparison of Bulk Polymeric Resin Composite and Hybrid Glass Ionomer Cement in Adhesive Class I Dental Restorations: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.

This study aimed to investigate the mechanical behavior of resin composites and hybrid glass ionomer cement in class I adhesive dental restorations under loading and shrinkage conditions. Three CAD models of a mandibular first molar with class I cavities were created and restored with different techniques: a bi-layer of Equia Forte HT with Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative composite (model A), a single layer of adhesive and Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative (model B), and a single layer of Equia forte HT (model C). Each model was exported to computer-aided engineering software, and 3D finite element models were created. Models A and B exhibited a similar pattern of stress distribution along the enamel-restoration interface, with stress peaks of 12.5 MPa and 14 MPa observed in the enamel tissue. The sound tooth, B, and C models showed a similar trend along the interface between dentine and restoration. A stress peak of about 0.5 MPa was detected in the enamel of both the sound tooth and B models. Model C showed a reduced stress peak of about 1.2 MPa. A significant stress reduction in 4 mm deep class I cavities in lower molars was observed in models where non-shrinking dental filling materials, like the hybrid glass ionomer cement used in model C, were applied. Stress reduction was also achieved in model A, which employed a bi-layer technique with a shrinking polymeric filling material (bulk resin composite). Model C's performance closely resembled that of a sound tooth.

One-Year Evaluation of High-Power Rapid Curing on Dentin Bond Strength.

This study investigated the effect of 3 s light-curing with a high-power LED curing unit on the shear bond strength of bulk-fill composites. Four bulk-fill composites were bonded to dentin with a universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Plus): two materials designed for rapid curing (Tetric PowerFill and Tetric PowerFlow) and two controls (Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative and SDR Plus Bulk Fill Flowable). The 4 mm composite layer was light-cured with Bluephase PowerCure for 20 s at 1000 mW/cm2 ("20 s") or for 3 s at 3000 mW/cm2 ("3 s"). The samples were stored at 37 °C in distilled water and tested after 1, 6 and 12 months. The samples polymerised in the "3 s" mode had statistically similar or higher bond strength than the samples cured in "20 s" mode, except for the Tetric PowerFlow (1 month) and SDR+ (6 month). The flowable materials Tetric PowerFlow and SDR Plus initially showed the highest values in the "3 s" and "20 s" groups, which decreased after 12 months. The bond strength was statistically similar for all materials and curing protocols after 12 months, except for Tetric PowerFill cured with the "3 s" protocol (21.22 ± 5.0 MPa), which showed the highest value. Tetric PowerFill showed the highest long-term bond strength. While "3 s" curing resulted in equal or better shear bond strength, its use can only be recommended for a material with an AFCT agent such as Tetric PowerFill.

Effect of Polywave and Monowave Light Curing Units on the Microtensile Bond Strength and Failure Types of Different Bulk-Fill Resin Composites: An in vitro Study.

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of polywave and monowave light-emitting diode curing units on the microtensile bond strength and failure types of three bulk-fill resin composites. This in vitro experimental study was performed on 180 microbars obtained from human third molars and were distributed into 12 groups according to the type of bulk-fill resin composite and the light-curing unit. Third molars were restored using Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative, Tetric® N-Ceram Bulk Fill, and Opus Bulk Fill resin composites was light-cured with Elipar Deep Cure L and Valo in three modes: standard, high power, and extra power. Subsequently, microtensile analysis was carried out with a universal testing machine and the type of failure with an optical stereomicroscope. For statistical analysis, the Kruskal-Wallis H-test was used, with the Bonferroni post hoc test and Fisher's exact test, considering a significance of p<0.05. There were significant differences in the microtensile bond strength between the Filtek One Bulk Fill restorative and Opus Bulk-Fill (p = 0.042) when light was cured with the polywave unit at standard power. On the other hand, the Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative and Opus Bulk Fill resins showed significant differences in microtensile bond strength when light was cured with the monowave unit compared with the polywave unit (p<0.05). The presence of alternative photoinitiator systems that are more reactive than camphorquinone produced higher microtensile bond strength in Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill and Opus Bulk Fill resins when light-cured with a high and standard polywave unit, respectively, compared to Filtek One Bulk Fill resins. Finally, Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill and Opus Bulk Fill resins had the highest percentage of mixed failures, while Filtek One Bulk Fill resin had adhesive failures, which was related to its lower microtensile bond strength.

Polymerization efficiency of different bulk-fill resin composites cured by monowave and polywave light-curing units: a comparative study.

The objective was to evaluate the polymerization efficiency of different bulk-fill resin-based composites cured by monowave and polywave light-curing units, by assessment of the degree of conversion and Vickers microhardness at different depths. Two commercially available bulk-fill resin-based composites were used: Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative (3M ESPE) and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill (Ivoclar Vivadent). The light-curing units utilized were two LED light-curing units: a monowave LED light-curing unit (BlueLEX LD-105, Monitex) and a polywave LED light-curing unit (Twin Wave GT-2000, Monitex). For each test, 20 cylindrical specimens (4 mm diameter, 4 mm thickness) were prepared from each bulk-fill resin-based composite using a split Teflon mold. Ten specimens were light-cured by the monowave light-curing unit and the other ten were light-cured by the polywave light-curing unit according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) was used to assess the degree of conversion, and a Vickers microhardness tester was used to assess Vickers microhardness. Statistical analysis was performed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests (P < .05). The degree of conversion and Vickers microhardness in bulk-fill resin-based composites containing only camphorquinone as photoinitiator were similar when cured with either monowave or polywave light-curing units. However, bulk-fill resin-based composites containing a combination of photoinitiators exhibited significantly higher degree of conversion and Vickers microhardness when cured with a polywave light-curing unit. Although all groups showed statistically significant differences between the top and bottom surfaces regarding degree of conversion and Vickers microhardness, all of them showed bottom/top ratios > 80% regarding degree of conversion and Vickers microhardness. The polywave light-curing unit enhanced the polymerization efficiency of bulk-fill resin-based composites especially when the latter contained a combination of photoinitiators, but does not prevent the use of a monowave light-curing unit.

Comparative clinical evaluation between self-adhesive and conventional bulk-fill composites in class II cavities: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical study.

This randomized controlled clinical trial compared the clinical efficacy of self-adhesive bulk-fill Surefil One with a traditional bulk-fill composite in class II restorations. Sixty-four direct class II composite restorations were categorized into two groups. Group I, control group (n = 32): cavities were restored by Filtek One bulk-fill composite with Scotchbond Universal (SBU) adhesive in self-etch mode, Group II, test group (n = 32): cavities were restored by Surefil One self-adhesive bulk-fill composite. The study involved a follow-up period of 1 year, during which restorations were assessed at baseline (BL), 6 months, and 12 months using Federation Dentaire Internationale (FDI) criteria. Data analysis was performed using nonparametric tests. A comparison of restoration characteristics was performed utilizing the chi-square test (X2). The significance level was set at 0.05. Filtek One and Surefil One bulk-fill composites revealed clinically acceptable FDI scores over 12-month recalls. Thirty-two patients (64 restorations) were available for all follow-up visits; 100% of the restorations survived. For esthetic properties, Filtek One was far better than Surefil One at all time points. However, in terms of functional and biological properties, both restorations demonstrated comparable performances. Filtek One bulk-fill restorations were superior in terms of surface luster, surface staining, color match, and translucency, but Surefil One restorations performed well and were similar to Filtek One restorations; however, additional advancements and research are needed to obtain better esthetics. Furthermore, longitudinal studies with extended follow-up periods are needed to assess the clinical potential of both materials. Both Filtek One and Surefil One met the FDI criteria, with Filtek One demonstrating superior esthetic and functional qualities and similar performance regarding biological criteria. Both innovative restorative materials show potential for clinical use. Trial registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number; NCT06120868:07/11/2023.

Adaptability of VisCalor versus bulk-fill composites using scanning electron microscope: an in-vitro study

Purpose To evaluate the marginal integrity of two types of bulk-fill composite resins in Class I box-shaped cavities. Materials and methods Forty extracted human sound molars were selected. The teeth were fixed with sticky wax to the base of plastic cylinder and the cylinder was filled with self-curing acrylic resin so that only root was embedded. Simple Class I box-shaped cavities were prepared using a fissure carbide bur with water spray and finished with fine-grained flame burs. The overall dimensions and depth of the cavities were standardized as follows: 4 mm length mesiodistally and 3 mm width buccolingually and up to 4 mm depth. All prepared cavities were bonded using Futurabond M+ one-step self-etch adhesive system. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups (n = 20 teeth each): group I: specimens were restored with VisCalor composite bulk-fill composite resin, which is heated before insertion using a VisCalor dispenser dental device. Group II: specimens were directly restored with X-tra fill bulk-fill composite resin without preheating. After curing, finishing and polishing were performed. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups a and b (n = 10) according to whether subjecting 500 thermocycling fluctuations or not. Each specimen was sectioned buccolingually through the center of the composite resin restoration in two halves, and then cleaned under running tap water and subjected to thorough ultrasonic cleaning to get rid of both soft and hard surface deposits. All sectional samples were fixated in cylindrical carriers, and a thin layer of gold was applied to the surfaces. The marginal adaptation of composite restorations and ultramorphology of adhesive bonds were analyzed at ×50, ×1000 magnification, with a scanning electron microscope. ×50 magnification was utilized to measure the length of margins free gap in enamel and dentin by Autodesk Auto CAD program and expressed in mm/percent. All data of measurements of the length of nongaped margins in enamel and dentin are collected, tabulated, and statistically analyzed. Results Group Ia (VisCalor bulk-fill not thermocycled), recorded the highest mean value of marginal free-gap with 10.26 ± 0.27 mm (93.31%), while group IIb (X-tra-fill bulk-fill thermocycled) recorded the lowest mean value in 7.90 ± 0.26 mm (73.04%) and the difference was statistically highly significant (P = 0.000). In general, group I recorded higher mean values of marginal free gap and adaptation in mm/percent than group II, and the difference was statistically highly significant at P value of 0.000 (9.86 ± 0.55 and 8.23 ± 0.39 mm and 89.15 ± 5.38 and 74.89 ± 3.69%, respectively). Bulk-fill restorations without thermocycling exhibited a higher mean value of marginal free gap and adaptation in mm/percent than the thermocycled one with a significant difference recorded at P value of 0.005. Conclusion Using preheated VisCalor bulk-fill composites could decrease the marginal gap formation improving the continuity at the tooth–restorative material interface than conventional bulk-fill restorations. On the other hand, thermocycling.

Does Preheating Influence the Cytotoxic Potential of Dental Resin Composites?

Resin-based dental composites (RBC) release cytotoxic components, however the extent of the elution from preheated RBCs is barely investigated. The aim was therefore to determine the cytotoxic effect of preheated conventional, bulk, and thermoviscous RBCs of clinically relevant sizes using different cell viability methods in a contact-free model. Samples (6 × 4 mm) were prepared from conventional [Estelite Sigma Quick (ESQ), Filtek Z250 (FZ)] and bulk-filled [Filtek One BulkFill Restorative (FOB), SDR Plus Bulk Flow (SDR), VisCalor Bulk (VCB)] RBCs. The pre-polymerization temperature was set to room temperature (RT) and 55/65 °C. Pulp cells were cultured, followed by a 2-day exposure to monomers released from solid RBC specimens suspended in the culture medium. Cytotoxicity was assessed using a WST-1, MTT, and LDH colorimetric viability assays. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test, multivariate analysis, and independent t-test. The effect size (ƞp2) of material and temperature factors was also assessed. All the RBCs demonstrated cytotoxic effect upon exposure to pulp cells, but to a varying extent (ESQ >> VCB > FZ = FOB = SDR). The effect of pre-polymerization temperature was insignificant (ƞp2 < 0.03), except for the thermoviscous RBC, which showed inconsistent findings when subjected to distinct viability tests. Cell viability was predominantly dependent on the type of material used (p < 0.001) which showed a large effect size (ƞp2 > 0.90). Irrespective of the pre-polymerization temperature, RBC samples in a clinically relevant size can release monomers to such an extent, which can substantially decrease the cytocompatibility.

Effect of repeated preheating on monomer elution from a bulk-fill composite resin.

Due to incomplete polymerization of composite resin restorations, residual monomers adversely affect their mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Preheating of composite resins is advised to increase the degree of conversion and reduce monomer elution. This study aimed to analyze the effect of preheating and repeated preheating on the amount of monomer released from a bulk-fill composite resin. Forty samples were prepared using Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative composite resin. Samples in one group were fabricated at room temperature, whereas the composite resins in the other groups were cured after 1, 10, or 20 repeated preheating cycles (55 °C), 10 in each group. Eluted urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) and bisphenol-A-glycidylmethacrylate (BisGMA) monomers were measured with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) 24 hours and 30 days after immersion. The data were evaluated using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests. Paired-sample t tests were used to test the differences between time intervals. At both time intervals, the greatest amounts of released BisGMA, UDMA, and total monomers were obtained from the control group, whereas 10 preheating cycles resulted in the least monomer elution. The decrease in monomer elution was not statistically significant after 10 preheating cycles compared with that after one preheating cycle (P>0.05). The group with 20 preheating cycles showed a greater amount of monomer elution compared to that with 1 and 10 cycles, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The amount of released monomers on day 30 was significantly higher than on day 1 (P<0.01). Preheating of the bulk-fill composite resin was shown to be effective in reducing monomer elution. However, monomer elution was adversely affected after repeated preheating cycles of 20.

The impact of Bis-GMA free and Bis-GMA containing resin composite as posterior restoration on marginal integrity: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BackgroundThere have been concerns surrounding the utilization of Bis-GMA, a type of bisphenol A (BPA) derivative, within the dental industry. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of bulk fill Bis-GMA-free resin composite class II restorations in respect of its marginal integrity in comparison to bulk fill Bis-GMA-containing resin composite class II restorations over a 12-month period in a parallel clinical trial utilizing a split-mouth, double-blind, randomized strategy.Methods20 patients participated in this study. Each patient has received one pair of class II posterior restorations, Bis-GMA-free (Admira fusion x-tra), and Bis-GMA containing (x-tra fil) on each side of the mouth (split-mouth strategy), (n = 40). The restorations’ marginal integrity was evaluated based on Ryge’s criteria (modified USPHS) at baseline (after 1 week), as well as 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and after 12 months of follow-up by two calibrated examiners. The statistical analyses utilizing the Friedman and Wilcoxon tests, the significance level was adjusted to 0.05.ResultsFollowing the 12-month period, all patients attended the recall visits to evaluate the restorations. The Wilcoxon signed-rank and Friedman tests, revealed that both types of bulk fill had 100% of Alpha (A) scores at baseline and after 1 month with no significant statistical differences. After 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, both tested bulk fill restorations showed Bravo (B) score with Bis-GMA free 10% and 5% for Bis-GMA containing with no statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) for clinical marginal integrity parameter in USPHS criteria.ConclusionsBis-GMA-free resin composites demonstrated satisfactory, marginal integrity compared with Bis-GMA-containing resin composites within 12 months.Trial registrationThe protocol of the current study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov, with the identification number NCT05480852 on 29/07/2022. All procedures involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, Egypt, under the approval number 419 on 27/06/2020.

Fatigue and marginal adaptation of bulk fill restoratives: Effect of the layering technique and cavity dimension of extensively damaged teeth.

To evaluate the effect of layering technique and cavity dimension on the fatigue behavior and marginal adaptation of bulk fill (BF) restorations in extensively damaged teeth. Seventy-two premolars received class II cavities (MOD) followed by endodontic treatment. Half sample had 1/3 of their palatal cusp removed. Teeth were restored using three techniques: (I) incremental, with conventional resin composite (RC); (C) combined, using BF flow and RC, (B) bulk fill, with regular BF. Specimens were subjected to fatigue (80N, 2Hz, 37° C water) for 1 million cycles (n=12). The test was interrupted every 250,000 cycles to evaluate tooth integrity, restoration fracture and adaptation using FDI criteria. Images of the proximal surfaces were obtained before and after the cycling to measure the gap. Restoration fatigue survival and success were analyzed using Weibull distribution and Maximum Likelihood Estimation. Gap thickness was analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (α=0.05). For the survival analysis, Weibull modulus (β) and characteristic lifetime (η) were similar among groups. Yet, for the success analysis, in which only restorations that were free of technical complications were ranked as success, the bulk-fill technique resulted in higher β, while the combined technique produced restorations with higher η, for teeth that had their cusp removed. C-technique also resulted in smaller gaps than I and B. The effect of the layering technique on the success of restorations was dependent on the cavity extension. The combined technique favors the adaptation and the longevity of extensively damaged teeth.

Color Stability Assessment of Three Different Resin Composites After Polymerization with Two Different Light-Curing Units

Purpose: Despite improvements in resin composite structures, color stability remains a challenge, and esthetic problems are the most common factors in renewing restorations. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of two light-curing units on the color stability of three different resin composite materials during a six-month period.&#x0D; Materials &amp; Methods: Three different resin composites (Filtek Z550, Filtek Ultimate Flowable, Filtek Bulk Fill Restorative) with an A2 color shade were prepared for each combination of resin composite-curing unit (5x2mm) for a total of 30 specimens. Specimens were cured with either QTH Hilux Ultraplus (700mW/cm2) for 40 seconds or Radii Plus LED Curing Light (1400mW/cm2) for 20 seconds. For standardization of the amount of transmitted energy to the composite, all specimens received 28J/cm2. Color parameters were measured with a colorimeter (Minolta CR-321, Konica Minolta Sensing Pte Ltd, Singapore) after polymerization and at 24 hours, first week, first month, third month, and sixth month. Color changes(∆E) were calculated for the different storage periods. One-factor repeated three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine the changes in ΔE measurements over time for different fillers and devices.&#x0D; Results: Significant differences between composites and periods were observed in the color stability with polymerization either QTH or LED. Independently of the composites, there was no significant difference at the end of six months between QTH and LED units with a fixed energy density. The Filtek Z550 material showed the smallest and the Filtek Ultimate Flowable material showed the highest ∆E values at the end of the six months among the materials used.&#x0D; Conclusion: Clinically acceptable color changes were observed for all the materials at the end of six months.

The Influence of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Dentine Pre-Treatment on Adhesive Interface and Marginal Sealing.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the combined effect of a 2% chlorhexidine aqueous solution and a universal adhesive system applied in self-etch and etch-and-rinse strategies on the composite resin-dentin interface. Materials and Methods: Class V cavities were prepared on the facial and lingual surfaces of forty caries-free molars extracted for orthodontic reasons. The samples were randomly divided into two groups corresponding to the used etching protocol: I-etch-and-rinse; II-self-etch. In each tooth, one cavity was assigned for the control subgroups -IA (n = 20) and IIA (n = 20)-adhesive only, and the opposite cavity was pretreated with a 2% chlorhexidine solution-Gluco CHeX Cerkamed-subgroups IB (n = 20) and IIB (n = 20). Both sets of groups were restored using a universal adhesive system (Single Bond Universal Adhesive, 3M-ESPE) and a bulk-fill composite resin (Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative, 3M-ESPE). The roots and the pulp tissue were then removed, and a needle connected to a perfusor with 100 mL saline solution was used for pulp pressure simulation with a hydrostatic pressure of 20 cm H2O. Cariogenic attack was simulated using a demineralizing solution for 3 days at a constant temperature of 25 °C. The teeth were then sectioned in a facial-lingual direction and the microleakages at the occlusal and cervical margins were registered and scored using an optical Carl-Zeiss AXIO Imager A1m microscope (Carl-Zeiss). The composite resin-dentin interface was analyzed using a SEM Vega Tescan LMH II. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: Microleakage evaluation showed no significant differences among the study groups (p > 0.05). In subgroup IA, significant differences were recorded between occlusal and cervical margins (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Application of chlorhexidine on tooth substrate before using a universal bonding system in total etch or self-etch mode has no influence on the adhesive interface in the condition of cariogenic attack. The thickness of the adhesive resin layer seems to be less uniform when using chlorhexidine, but the morphological differences at the adhesive interface have no influence on the sealing capacity of the universal bonding system, regardless of the etching strategy.

A cross-sectional survey on knowledge and attitudes of Greek dentists regarding molar incisor hypomineralisation diagnosis and treatment

BackgroundMolar Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH) remains a challenge for clinicians underlining the gap in the literature regarding the condition. The study aimed to record knowledge and attitudes of Greek dentists regarding diagnosis and treatment of MIH and correlate findings with non-dental characteristics.MethodsIt is a cross-sectional study based on a questionnaire consisting of 37 multiple-choice questions. Data regarding diagnosis, aetiopathogenesis, and clinical management of MIH were collected from active members of three Greek Dental Associations. Chi-square and student’s t-test were used to correlate responses with practitioners’ characteristics and odds ratios calculated to evaluate differences on treatment of MIH-affected teeth (p < 0.05).ResultsFrom the 360 participants (response rate = 94%), 185 were general dental practitioners (GDPs) and 175 dental specialists (59 paediatric dentists (PDs), 38 orthodontists and 78 of other specialties).MIH was commonly encountered as a clinical problem, with GDPs reporting genetics and fluoride intake as common aetiological factors at significantly higher percentages as compared to PDs (p < 0.05). Permanent molars and incisors (44%) were the teeth most commonly affected, with yellow/brown demarcated opacities (68%) the most common clinical feature with PDs reporting them in a significantly higher percentage (p < 0.05). Dentists with specialisation, dentists that treat > 10 children per week and children with MIH-affected teeth had a 2–5.5 times greater probability to report difficulty achieving sufficient anaesthesia and hypersensitivity problems (p < 0.001). Agreement between GDPs’ and dental specialists’ views was found on less invasive treatment of anterior lesions. Non-PDs reported bulk-fill restorations and onlays as the ideal treatment of severely-affected posterior teeth, as compared to PDs that preferred preformed metal crowns (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the age of the clinician, years of experience and number of children treated per week were the factors significantly associated with the decision for the treatment of only severely-affected posterior MIH teeth.ConclusionsMost participants had encountered MIH-affected teeth in their clinical practice and were able to recognize main aetiological factors and clinical findings related to the condition. Nevertheless, their knowledge regarding treatment is limited.

Effect of Mouthwashes for COVID-19 Prevention on Surface Changes of Resin Composites

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of various mouthwashes for COVID-19 prevention on surface hardness, roughness and color changes of bulk-fill and conventional resin composites and determine the pH and titratable acidity of mouthwashes.MethodsFour hundred and eighty specimens were fabricated in cylindrical molds (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness). Before immersion, baseline data of surface hardness, roughness, and color values were recorded. Each product of specimens (Filtek Z350XT, Premise, Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative, SonicFil 2) were divided into 4 groups for 0.2% povidone iodine, 1% hydrogen peroxide, 0.12% chlorhexidine, and deionized water (serving as a control). The specimens were immersed in mouthwashes for 1 minute and then stored in artificial saliva until 24 hours. This process was repeated for 14 days. After immersion, surface hardness, roughness and color values of specimens were measured at 7 and 14 days. The data were statistically analyzed by two-way repeated ANOVA, Tukey's HSD and a t-test (p<0.05).ResultsAfter immersion, all mouthwashes caused significantly lower surface hardness, greater roughness and color values (p<0.05) on all resin composites tested.ConclusionsMouthwashes had an effect on all resin composites evaluated by a significant decrease of surface hardness, and an increase of roughness and color values (p<0.05).

Evaluation of microleakage and push-out bond strength of various composite resins for sealing the screw-access channel in implant-supported restorations

Statement of problemMicroleakage and loss of the composite resin sealing the screw-access channel are frequent complications of screw-retained implant-supported prostheses. How the screw-access channel should be best restored to reduce such complications is unclear. PurposeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the microleakage and bond strength of 3 types of composite resins (flowable, packable, and bulk-fill) with or without a bonding agent treatment to seal the screw-access channel of 2 types of restorative materials (zirconia and Co-Cr alloy) with or without thermocycling. Material and methodsIn total, 240 yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) specimens (IPS e.max ZirCAD) and 240 Co-Cr alloy (Vera PDS) specimens were prepared with a Ø3×3-mm cylindrical cavity at the center to simulate the screw-access channel. Three types of composite resins (flowable, packable, and bulk-fill resin) (Filtek Z350 XT Flowable Restorative, Filtek Z350 XT Universal Restorative, and Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative) were applied to restore the access channel of the zirconia and Co-Cr specimens with or without a bonding agent (Single Bond Universal Adhesive). Microleakage and push-out bond strength were determined and compared by dividing the specimens into experimental groups with or without thermocycling (1000 times with 30 seconds at 5 ±2 °C and 55 ±2 °C). The results were analyzed by using a 1-way ANOVA and 4-way ANOVA. Adjustment for multiple comparisons was made with the Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test. ResultsThe specimens subjected to thermocycling showed a lower bond strength (P<.001) and higher microleakage (P<.001) than specimens stored in a constant-temperature water bath. Specimens treated with bonding agents showed a higher bond strength (P<.001) and lower microleakage (P<.001) than specimens not treated with a bonding agent. Higher bond strengths were observed in the order of bulk-fill resin, packable resin, and flowable resin (P<.001). Packable resin showed higher microleakage than flowable resin and bulk-fill resin (P<.05). No significant difference in microleakage was found between the flowable resin and bulk-fill resin (P>.05). ConclusionsHigher bond strengths were observed in the order of bulk-fill resin, packable resin, and flowable resin. Less microleakage was observed in the flowable resin and bulk-fill resin than in the packable composite resin. Bonding agent treatment was effective in increasing bond strength and decreasing microleakage. Zirconia and Co-Cr showed a bond strength similar to that of composite resins, but zirconia showed higher microleakage than Co-Cr. Restoring the screw-access channel with the bulk-fill resin should increase bond strength and reduce microleakage.

Effect of different polymerization times on color change, translucency parameter, and surface hardness of bulk-fill resin composites.

Polymerization plays an important role in the optical and mechanical properties resin composite materials. The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of different polymerization times on the color change, translucency parameter (TP), and surface hardness of resin composites after thermocycling. Microhybrid resin composite (Filtek Z250; used in the control group) and bulk-fill resin composites (Filtek One Bulk-Fill Restorative, Tetric EvoCeram Bulk-Fill, and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill) were used. Each bulk-fill composite was placed as a single layer. Polymerization of the bulk-fill composites in the first group was completed in 20 s, and that in the second group was completed in 40 s (n = 10). Filtek Z250's polymerization was completed with 2 mm (20 s) + 2 mm (20 s). The color change (ΔE00) and translucency parameter (TP00) were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula. Before and after thermocycling, the TP and surface hardness values were measured. The data were analyzed using one- and two-way analysis of variance, paired-samples t-test, and Tukey's test (P < 0.05). After thermocycling, the ΔE00 values of the resin composite samples were 1.66-2.56. Compared to the control group, the Filtek One Bulk-Fill 20 s group exhibited the lowest color change values. The Filtek Z250 group exhibited lower TP and significantly higher microhardness values than the other bulk-fill resin groups before and after thermocycling (P < 0.05). There were no observed differences in the Tetric N-Ceram and Tetric EvoCeram groups before and after thermocycling. Under the conditions of 10,000 thermal cycles, different curing times did not affect the color change and hardness values of the bulk-fill materials. However, differences were observed among the composite materials. After thermocycling, the surface hardness and TP values decreased in all the resin composites. Depending on the material content, effective results can be obtained from the 20 s polymerization of bulk-fill resin composites.

Wear and Color Stability of Preheated Bulk-fill and Conventional Resin Composites.

Bulk-fill resin composite is commonly used in direct restorations. It is recommended that the high-viscosity version of these materials be preheated to improve flowability and adaptability. It is unknown what effects preheating (PH) might have on the wear resistance and color stability of these resin composites. This study compared the wear and color stability of high-viscosity bulk-fill and conventional resin composites with and without PH, using the CIEDE2000 formula. Thirty-two disc-shaped specimens (n=16, 10×3 mm) were prepared with Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative (FOBFR; 3M ESPE) and Filtek Supreme Ultra (FSU, 3M ESPE) to determine wear. Each group was divided into subgroups based on preparation conditions, that is, PH and room temperature (RT) (n=8). Thermomechanical fatigue was applied to specimens, and volumetric material loss was calculated using a laser scanner (LAS-20, SD Mechatronik, Feldkirchen-Westerham, Germany) and three-dimensional imaging software (Geomagic, 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA). An additional 124 disc-shaped specimens (n=64, 10×1 mm) were prepared with FOBFR and FSU, and subgroups were formed based on preparation conditions (PH and RT, n=32). Specimens were aged for 14 days in coffee, grape juice, distilled water, and thermocycling (20,000 cycles, 5°C-55°C). To determine color change, the lightness (L), chroma (C), and hue (H) values were measured at baseline and after 14 days using the CIEDE2000 formula. All data were statistically analyzed, and a 95% significance level was set. In both the PH and RT groups, FSU exhibited greater wear than FOBFR (p<0.05). Both materials were subjected to increased wear as a result of PH. After aging, a significant difference in color change was observed (p<0.05) when controlling for time and resin composite type, except for deionized water and thermocycling (p>0.05). PH had no effect on the color stability of the resin composite at any time (p<0.05). The high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composite displayed superior wear resistance and similar color stability compared with its conventional counterpart. PH resin composite may increase its susceptibility to wear and has no effect on its color stability.

Marginal integrity of classical and bulk-fill composite restorations in permanent and primary molars

Bulk-fill composites enable timesaving and less technical-sensitive application of restorations. This study investigated and compared the marginal integrity of classical and bulk-fill composite restorations in primary and permanent molars before and after thermo-mechanical loading (TML). Two Class II cavities were prepared in each of 20 primary and 20 permanent molars. The molars were randomised in four groups for each molar type. Groups 1 and 5 were restored with a high-viscous bulk-fill composite (Tetric PowerFill), groups 2 and 6 were restored with a flowable bulk-fill composite (Tetric PowerFlow), groups 3 and 7 were restored with a high-viscous classical composite (Tetric Prime), and groups 4 and 8 were restored with a flowable classical composite (Tetric EvoFlow). In permanent molars, the flowable composites were covered with a 2-mm layer of high-viscous composite (groups 6 and 8). The restorations were subjected to TML in a custom-made chewing machine (5–50 °C, 2 min dwelling time, × 1000; 400 ,000 loading cycles, 1.7 Hz, 49 N), and quantitative marginal analysis was conducted using scanning electron microscopy. Marginal integrity of each restoration was calculated as a percentage of continuous margins before and after TML. The tested high-viscous bulk-fill restoration showed similarly high marginal integrity in primary and permanent molars as the classical restoration. The tested flowable bulk-fill restoration showed the lowest marginal integrity compared to all other restorations after TML. In contrast to flowable bulk-fill restorations, high-viscous bulk-fill restorations show similar marginal integrity as classical hybrid composite restorations after TML, in both primary and permanent molars.