s of Speakers / Clinical Neurophysiology 125, Supplement 1 (2014) S1–S339 S9 anodal direct cortical stimulation, activates the corticospinal tract close to the axon hillock at the border between the grey and the white matter. DCS remains the most focal stimulation possible and thus is favorable used for tumor removal within the vicinity of the motor cortex. MEPs became focus of neurooncological strategies for optimized glioma resection. Combining DCS-MEPs and monopolar cortical/subcortical stimulation mapping techniques in supratentorial tumor surgery as well as combination with intraoperative imaging could achieve supramarginal resection. The proposed subcortical stimulation motor threshold of 2 mA for safe resection has to be confirmed with regard to tumor type and precise location of stimulation. As been shown in cerebral aneurysm surgery, the ability to detect pure motor hemiparesis in carotid endarterectomy was more recently shown in a multicenter study. In spine surgery, presence or disappearance (“all-or-nothing” principle) of MEP amplitude criteria is commonly accepted: the presence of any MEPs is related to unaffected motor function or transient paresis, with the exception of radiculopathy. In cervical and thoracic intramedullary spinal cord surgery, the additional implementation of the D-wave helps to distinguish between permanent and transient motor deficit: D-wave preservation is always followed by a recovery of motor function. The latter seems to be applicable in supratentorial surgeries alike. In summary, MEPs are specific and sensitive for the assessment of the motor cortex and the corticospinal tract. In supratentorial tumor surgery MEPs are increasingly becoming a tool for “functional” guided resection strategies. S40 Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in pediatric neurosurgery: a focus on the sacral system F. Sala1, G. Squintani2, V. Tramontano2, C. Arcaro1 1Institute of Neurosurgery, Verona, Italy; 2Division of Neurology, Neurosciences, Verona, Italy Introduction: Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IOM) is nowadays extensively used in Pediatric Neurosurgery and tethered cord surgery is one of the most useful application. Our goal is to describe and discuss the standard IOM techniques used during tethered cord surgery, in the light of our clinical experience over the past ten years. Material and methods: Neurophysiological mapping of the conus-cauda is performed through direct stimulation of these structures and bilateral recording from segmental target muscles. While mapping identify ambiguous neural structures, their functional integrity during surgery can be assessed by monitoring techniques only, such as somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from limb muscles and anal sphincters, and the bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR). Results: Between 2002 and 2012, we performed 48 surgical procedures in 47 patients with a tethered cord secondary to a variety of spinal dysraphisms. The monitorability rate was 84% for SEPs, 97% for limb muscle MEPs, 74% for the anal sphincter MEPs, and 59% for the BCR. In all patients but one SEP, MEP and BCR remained stable during surgery. Post-operatively two out of 47 patients presented a significant – though transient – neurological worsening. In six patients an unexpected muscle response was evoked by stimulating tissue macroscopically considered as not functional. Conclusions: Mapping techniques allow to identify and spare functional neural tissue and, vice-versa, to cut non-functional structures that may contribute to cord tethering. Monitoring techniques, MEP and BCR in particular, improve the reliability of intraoperative neurophysiology. IOM minimizes neurological morbidity in tethered cord surgery. S41 Neurophysiology of congenital mirror movements