On Tyranny and Succession:Rethinking Monarchical Legitimacy in Calderón's En la vida todo es verdad y todo mentira (1659) Harrison Meadows By early 1659, the Spanish crown faced the undeniable reality of declining political and military influence in Europe. Hope for victory in the Franco-Spanish War in Flanders was all but lost after strategic locations had recently fallen into French and English hands, which would force Felipe IV to agree to the unfavorable terms of the Treaty of the Pyrenees later in the year. Meanwhile, the war to recover Portugal for the Spanish crown showed no signs of abating. Nevertheless, the royal family maintained appearances through lavish royal celebrations, even though the coffers were long empty from the administration of a global empire and the unrelenting burdens of war. However, the lively festivities that took place at court during February 1659 for Shrovetide, while not an exception, came on the heels of events that offered reason for rekindled optimism. In December of the previous year, Mariana of Austria had given birth to Fernando Tomás, the second royal issue in as many years. He and his older brother Felipe Próspero renewed hope in Habsburg succession to the Spanish throne after over a decade without a legitimate male heir following the death of Balthasar Carlos in 1647.1 [End Page 257] As part of the entertainments for the Carnival season in 1659, Pedro Calderón de la Barca, a favorite playwright of the court, was commissioned to write a comedia to be staged for the king and queen at the Buen Retiro Palace. For the occasion, Calderón composed En la vida todo es verdad y todo mentira, a play that takes place during an especially chaotic period of contested succession in the seventh-century Byzantine Empire.2 As in many of his historical and mythological plays, Calderón applies poetic license liberally in fashioning the details of the historical narrative for his own dramatic purposes.3 In the opening scene, Focas, the emperor of Constantinople, arrives at Trinacria (modern-day Sicily), where he is greeted by Cintia, the queen of the island. In a lengthy opening monologue, Focas provides his backstory: he was raised by wolves in the mountainous landscape near Mount Etna, and later, the king of Trinacria—Cintia's father—had contracted him to defend the island from Mauricio, the emperor of Constantinople at that time. After killing Mauricio in battle, the treacherous Focas betrayed Cintia's father and usurped the imperial throne for himself, on which he has reigned for the twenty years leading up to the present moment in Calderón's work. In the political context of the seventeenth century, usurpers were considered tyrants, and therefore Focas would have been understood as such by a contemporary audience, irrespective of more modern notions of tyranny that focus almost exclusively on "the despotic or cruel exercise of public power" (Brincat 214). As a nuance to the modern view, classical notions of monarchical legitimacy viewed usurpation as the contravention of a divine plan, and a usurper's mismanagement of authority therefore was an expected consequence of someone other than the divinely appointed monarch sitting on the throne. Abuse of power flowed naturally—necessarily [End Page 258] even—out of the tyrant's false claim to the power afforded the position. When Cintia identifies Focas as "un tirano" (1.25) in an aside at the beginning of En la vida…, she not only highlights his reckless administration of royal power, but also the illegitimacy of his right to rule at all, having ascended to the throne through usurpation.4 In terms of the play's conflict, Focas's tyrannous reign constitutes a disturbance in the natural order, which can only be restored by his demise and the ascension of a legitimate king to the throne. On the one hand, staging the death of a tyrant is a politically cautious choice on the part of Calderón. Theatrical audiences have always been captivated by watching a threat to society's ideological commitments eliminated in theatrical space, and usurpation was universally condemned yet not an immediately pressing concern for the Spanish crown in 1659. On the other...