Bubble Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Research Articles

Risk Factors Associated With Early-Selective Bubble Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Surfactant Failure in Premature Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Risk Factors Associated With Early-Selective Bubble Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Surfactant Failure in Premature Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The effect of bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure application on saliva cortisol levels in full-term neonates

Background Neonates with respiratory distress are commonly treated with bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) and undergo many procedures that cause stress-induced pain. Salivary cortisol is a biomarker of alteration in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis caused by repeated and long-term exposure to stress.
 Objective To analyze the effect of bubble nCPAP use on salivary cortisol levels in full-term infants.
 Methods This study used a one-group pre-test­–post-test design to compare salivary cortisol levels before and 30 minutes after bubble nCPAP application. Salivary cortisol was measured using an ELISA method. Pain was also assessed at the same time points using the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) score. We included infants of 37 0/7 to 42 6/7 weeks’ gestational age with respiratory distress necessitating bubble nCPAP application. Infants with birth weight of <2,500 grams, major congenital anomalies, an APGAR score of <5 at 5 minutes, shock, and infants who had undergone surgery were excluded.
 Results A total of 38 subjects participated in this study. Prior to bubble nCPAP application, median cortisol levels were significantly lower (1.65 ng/mL) than after bubble nCPAP application (6.8 ng/mL) (p value?). There were no significant differences in cortisol increase based on gender, type of birth, or salivary cortisol sampling time. There were significant differences in pain level after the 30-minute nCPAP application.
 Conclusion An increase in cortisol levels and pain scale scores during administration of bubble nCPAP indicates a pain response in full-term neonates; therefore, this procedure should be accompanied by pain or stress management.

Safety of bubble nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress.

Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) is an effective therapy for infants in respiratory distress. We here report the safety of a novel, low-cost, non-electric bubble NIPPV device in comparison with bubble NCPAP. At Paramitha Children's Hospital (Hyderabad, India), preterm (n = 60) neonates with moderate respiratory distress were pragmatically allocated to bubble NCPAP (5-8 cm H2O) or bubble NIPPV (Phigh 8-12 cm H2O/Plow 5-8 cm H2O) based on staff and equipment availability. Primary outcomes to assess safety included clinically relevant pneumothorax, nasal septal necrosis, or abdominal distention. One patient in each arm developed minor nasal septal injury (grade 3 on NCPAP, grade 2 on NIPPV); no patients in either arm developed a clinically significant pneumothorax or abdominal distention. The similar rates of nasal septal injury, pneumothorax and abdominal distention suggest that bubble NIPPV has a similar safety profile as bubble NCPAP for preterm infants in respiratory distress.

Standardized nCPAP Care Bundle to Decrease Days to Wean Off nCPAP: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Effective bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure (bnCPAP) implementation is a means to maintain functional residual capacity (FRC) and avoid pulmonary morbidities in neonates. A quality improvement project was introduced to establish a standardized bnCPAP care bundle. A bnCPAP care bundle focusing on shoulder roll use, bnCPAP positioning, assessment for suctioning need, and nasopharynx suctioning was created. The outcome measures collected were percentage of time the infant's pulse saturation was less than 86%, corrected gestational age (CGA) when off bnCPAP, length of time a neonate is on bnCPAP, Downes' score, and compliance to bnCPAP care bundle. An independent-samples t test found a statistically significant higher mean prior to the initiative in the percentage of time the oxygen saturation was less than 86%, Downes' score, length of time, and CGA to wean off bnCPAP ( M = 11.7% ± 10.1%, M = 1.6 ± 1.1, M = 27.7 days ± 29.0 days, and M = 35.0 weeks ± 3.38 weeks, respectively) than after the initiative ( M = 4.0% ± 4.8%, M = 1.1 ± 0.8, M = 11.2 days ± 10.2 days, and M = 32.8 weeks ± 1.00 weeks, respectively). Implementing a standardized bnCPAP care bundle showed improvement in oxygen saturation and increased success of weaning off bnCPAP. Future studies to increase the collected data are needed to compare the outcomes on infants born at each gestational age.

Cue-Based Feeding as Intervention to Achieve Full Oral Feeding in Preterm Infants Primarily Managed with Bubble CPAP.

Cue-based feeding aims at matching introduction of per oral (PO) feeding with physiological readiness of preterm infants to facilitate PO intake and avoid oral aversion. It was claimed that cue-based feeding may lead to delay in the initiation or achieving full PO feeding in clinical setting primarily using bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The study aimed to examine the association of cue-based feeding with time of introduction and completing oral feeding in infants primarily managed with bubble CPAP. A retrospective analysis where outcomes of preterm infants ≤32 weeks' gestational age (GA) and ≤2,000 g birth weight (BW) were compared after a practice change from volume-based feeding advancement to cue-based feeding. Continuous variables were compared by using t-test and multilinear regression analysis to control for confounding variables. Of the 311 preterm infants who met inclusion and exclusion criteria, 194 were in the cue-based feeding group and 117 were in the volume-based advancement historical comparison group. There were no differences between groups regarding demographic or clinical variables. Postmenstrual age (PMA) of initial feeding assessment was less in the cue-based feeding group. Age of first PO feeding and when some PO was achieved every feed was mildly delayed in the cue-based feeding compared with comparison group, 34 (±1.3) versus 33.7 (±1.2) weeks, and 36.2 (±2.3) versus 36.0 (±2.4) weeks, (p < 0.01) respectively. However, the age of achieving full PO did not differ between groups, 36.8 (±2.2) versus 36.4 (±2.4) weeks (p = 0.13). There was no difference between groups regarding growth parameters at 36 weeks' PMA or at discharge. Similar results were obtained when examining subcategories of infants ≤1,000 g and 1,001 to 2,000 g. Cue-based feeding may not be associated with a delay in achieving full oral feeding or prolongation of the length of stay in preterm infants managed with CPAP. · Cue-based feeding matches introduction of PO feeding with physiological readiness.. · Cue-based feeding may not be associated with a delay in achieving full oral feeding in preterm infants.. · Cue-based feeding is not associated with prolongation of the length of stay in preterm infants.. · Cue based feeding in preterm infants managed with noninvasive bubble CPAP is examined..

Bubble Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (bNCPAP): An Effective Low-Cost Intervention for Resource-Constrained Settings.

Preterm birth complications are responsible for almost one-third of the global neonatal mortality burden, and respiratory distress syndrome remains the single most common cause of these preventable deaths. Since its inception, almost half a century ago, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) has evolved to become the primary modality for neonatal respiratory care in both the developed and developing world. Although evidence has demonstrated the effectiveness of low-cost bubble NCPAP in reducing newborn mortality, its widespread use is yet to be seen in resource-constrained settings. Moreover, many tertiary hospitals in developing countries still utilise an inexpensive locally assembled bNCPAP system of unknown efficacy and safety. This review provides a brief overview of the history, physiological benefits, indications, contraindications, and complications of bNCPAP. Evidence regarding the effectiveness of low-cost bNCPAP in the neonatal intensive care unit is also summarised. The article further details a locally assembled bNCPAP system used in resource-constrained settings and highlights the care package for neonates receiving bNCPAP, failure criteria, and strategies for weaning.

Bubble Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (bCPAP) versus Control in Neonates with Respiratory Distress.

To compare the effectiveness of bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) and oxygen inhalation via nasal cannula in neonates presenting with respiratory distress, using Silverman Anderson Retraction Score (SARS). Randomised clinical trial. Department of Paediatrics, Unit-1, KEMU/Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from April 2017 to June 2018. A total of 120 neonates fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled and were randomly allocated in two groups: Group A and Group B. In group A, neonates were given bCPAP for respiratory support, while neonates in group B were given nasal oxygen as control group. Neonates in both groups were followed for 48 hours. The effectiveness was determined by the reduction in SARS, up to or less than score 3, at the end of a 48-hour period. Data were collected and analysed by SPSS version 20.0. P-value ≤0.05 was taken as significant. In Group A, effectiveness was found to be 93.3%, and in Group B effectiveness was 71.7% (p = 0.003). Median reduction in SARS from 00 to 48 hours, in group A (bCPAP) was 4 (4 - 5) while in group B (control), it was 3 (2 - 3); statistically significant (p <0.001). Bubble CPAP was more effective than nasal oxygen alone, in treatment of respiratory distress among neonates. This study suggested that bCPAP should be used more frequently in NICUs of Pakistan to reduce burden of neonatal morbidity due to respiratory distress. Key Words: Bubble CPAP, Respiratory distress, Neonates, Silverman Anderson Retraction Score.

A Pilot Study of Responses to Suctioning Among Neonates on Bubble Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure.

Maintenance of a patent airway while the neonate is on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nasal CPAP) requires vigilant monitoring and oral/nasopharyngeal suctioning. Currently, no evidence-based guidelines for safe suctioning in neonates while on bubble nasal CPAP have been published. (1) To characterize the clinical and behavioral responses of neonates on bubble nasal CPAP in a level III neonatal intensive care unit following routine oral and nasopharyngeal suctioning. This pilot study has a 1-sample within-subject repeated-measures design in which neonates (N = 16) served as their own control. Data on a neonate's physiological and behavior measures (heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation [SaO2], and Premature Infant Pain Profile [PIPP] score) were collected before, during, and after the completion of suctioning sequence. A total of 16 neonates with a mean gestational age of 29.76 weeks and an average day of life of 3.4 were enrolled. The infant's heart rates did not differ significantly (P = .51) across the suctioning sequence. There were no statistical significant changes in the average respiratory rate across the suctioning sequences (P = .79). SaO2 demonstrated a drop between baseline and after each suctioning (P < .001). The PIPP score demonstrated a precipitous increase throughout the procedure (P < .001). On average, it took 9.5 seconds (SD = 4.9) to complete the suctioning sequences. Our results suggest that the guideline tested is safe and tolerated by infants. This guideline should be tested in a larger sample and with neonates on other nasal CPAP systems.

Randomized Trial Comparing 3 Approaches to the Initial Respiratory Management of Preterm Neonates

We designed a multicenter randomized trial to compare 3 approaches to the initial respiratory management of preterm neonates: prophylactic surfactant followed by a period of mechanical ventilation (prophylactic surfactant [PS]); prophylactic surfactant with rapid extubation to bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure (intubate-surfactant-extubate [ISX]) or initial management with bubble continuous positive airway pressure and selective surfactant treatment (nCPAP). Neonates born at 26 0/7 to 29 6/7 weeks' gestation were enrolled at participating Vermont Oxford Network centers and randomly assigned to PS, ISX, or nCPAP groups before delivery. Primary outcome was the incidence of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. 648 infants enrolled at 27 centers. The study was halted before the desired sample size was reached because of declining enrollment. When compared with the PS group, the relative risk of BPD or death was 0.78 (95% confidence interval: 0.59-1.03) for the ISX group and 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.09) for the nCPAP group. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality or other complications of prematurity. In the nCPAP group, 48% were managed without intubation and ventilation, and 54% without surfactant treatment. Preterm neonates were initially managed with either nCPAP or PS with rapid extubation to nCPAP had similar clinical outcomes to those treated with PS followed by a period of mechanical ventilation. An approach that uses early nCPAP leads to a reduction in the number of infants who are intubated and given surfactant.

Effects of Flow Rate on Delivery of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in an In Vitro Model

There has been concern over the effect of vigorous bubbling on the delivery pressure during the operation of the bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) system. We investigated the relationship between intra-tubing pressure changes and flow rates in a closed bubble CPAP system in vitro. Using an experimental (in vitro) model, the distal connecting tube of the CPAP system was immersed under the water seal to a depth of 5 cm. Sixteen different flow rates, ranging from 2 L/min to 20 L/min, were tested. The procedure was repeated 10 times at each flow rate, and the intra-tubing pressure was recorded. The intra-tubing pressure within the model increased as the air flow rates were adjusted from 2 L/min to 20 L/min. The relationship was represented by the following equation, pressure (cmH(2)O) = 5.37 + 0.15 x flow rate (L/min) (R(2) = 0.826, p < 0.001). These results demonstrated that the intra-tubing pressure in a bubble CPAP system was highly correlated with flow rate in vitro.

Bubble and ventilator-derived nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: work of breathing and gas exchange

During bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure (B-NCPAP), gas flows through the expiratory limb of CPAP tubing submerged underwater to a depth in centimeters considered equal to the desired end expiratory pressure. Ventilator-derived NCPAP (V-NCPAP) controls the delivered pressure at the expiratory orifice. Limited data exist comparing the two forms of NCPAP on work of breathing (WOB) and other short-term respiratory outcomes. We compared WOB and gas exchange between B-NCPAP and V-NCPAP at equivalent delivered nasal prong pressures among a cohort of preterm infants on NCPAP. We performed a randomized crossover study in 18 premature infants <1500 g (BW 1101±254 g, GA 28±2 weeks, study age 13±8 days (means±s.d.)), who were already on NCPAP for mild respiratory distress, comparing B-NCPAP to V-NCPAP. Each infant was studied at a constant flow rate and varying pressures of 3, 5, 7, 4 and 2 cm H(2)O in that order. Tidal volumes were obtained by calibrated respiratory inductance plethysmography. Intrapleural pressure was estimated by an esophageal catheter. WOB (inspiratory, elastic and resistive) was calculated from pressure volume data. Breathing asynchrony was assessed with phase angle. Comparisons of respiratory rate, heart rate, tidal volume, minute ventilation, breathing asynchrony, lung compliance, oxygen saturation and transcutaneous (Tc) O(2) and CO(2) were also made. WOB and most respiratory parameters were not different between B-NCPAP and V-NCPAP. TcO(2) was higher with B-NCPAP compared to V-NCPAP (P=0.01). TcCO(2) was not different. None of the other measured parameters was significantly different between the two devices. WOB and ventilation with B-NCPAP and V-NCPAP are similar when equivalent delivered prong pressures are assured. Improved oxygenation with B-NCPAP is intriguing and requires further investigation.

Effects of Flow Amplitudes on Intraprong Pressures During Bubble Versus Ventilator-Generated Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Premature Infants

The goal were to characterize the flow dependence of bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure delivery in a cohort of preterm infants and to compare the actual (delivered) intraprong continuous positive airway pressure with the intended (set) nasal continuous positive airway pressure for both ventilator-generated nasal continuous positive airway pressure and bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure delivery. A range of set values and constant flow rates were studied in the same preterm infants. For 12 premature infants of <1500 g (birth weight: 1140 +/- 267 g; gestational age: 28.5 +/- 1.9 weeks; study age: 12.9 +/- 8 days; all mean +/- SD), intraprong pressures were measured at 3 increasing flow settings, repeated for set nasal continuous positive airway pressures (or desired immersion depths) of 4 and 6 cm H(2)O. Next, intraprong pressures were measured at bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure expiratory tubing submersion depths and ventilator-generated nasal continuous positive airway pressure set expiratory pressures of 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 cm H(2)O while the flow rate was held constant. Actual (delivered) intraprong pressure during bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure delivery was highly flow dependent and increased as the flow rate increased. During ventilator-generated nasal continuous positive airway pressure delivery, actual pressure at the nasal prongs closely approximated the pressure set at the ventilator. During bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure delivery at constant flow rate, the average delivered prong pressure was 1.3 cm H(2)O (range: 0.5-2.2 cm H(2)O) higher than that set through submersion of the expiratory tubing, and the relative difference between the set and actual pressures increased at lesser immersion depths. Prong pressure during bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure delivery is highly variable and depends on the interaction of submersion depth and flow amplitudes.

Unpredictability of Delivered Bubble Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: Role of Bias Flow Magnitude and Nares-Prong Air Leaks

Nasal continuous-positive-airway-pressure (NCPAP) is popular for infant respiratory support. We compared delivered to intended intra-prong, proximal-airway, and distal-airway pressures using ventilator (V-NCPAP) and bubble (B-NCPAP) devices. Measurements were repeated at five flows (4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 L/min) and three NCPAP (4, 6, and 8 cm H2O) under no, small, and large nares-prong interface leak conditions. With no-leak, delivered B-NCPAP was systematically greater than intended levels at all pressure sites. The corresponding V-NCPAP flow-dependence was none-to-minimal. Prong and intra-airway B-NCPAP overshoots were also observed with small-leak, while only prong B-NCPAP showed a flow-dependent overshoot for large-leak. Leaks did not affect intra-prong V-NCPAP but resulted in progressively lower than desired, flow-independent intra-airway V-NCPAP. We conclude that the self-adjusting capability of ventilators allows closely matched actual versus intended V-NCPAP. Alternatively, for the range of flows used clinically, intra-prong and intra-airway B-NCPAP are systematically higher at increasing flows than operator-intended levels, even when appreciable nares-prong leak is present. Additionally, the oscillations (noise) characterizing B-NCPAP are substantially attenuated between the proximal and distal airways; therefore, it is unlikely that B-NCPAP engenders ventilation or lung recruitment via this phenomenon. Tubing submersion depth for setting the level of B-NCPAP is highly inaccurate, and operators should instead rely on intra-prong pressure measurement.

Work of Breathing During Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants: A Comparison of Bubble vs Variable-Flow Devices

To compare work of breathing and breathing asynchrony during bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) vs variable-flow (VF)-NCPAP in premature infants. We studied 18 premature infants of birth weight <1500 g who required NCPAP for mild respiratory distress. Each infant was studied on bubble and VF-NCPAP at 8, 6, 4, and 0 cm H2O. Tidal volumes were obtained by calibrated respiratory inductance plethysmography. Esophageal pressure estimated intrapleural pressure. Inspiratory and resistive work of breathing were calculated from pressure-volume data. Breathing asynchrony was assessed with phase angle. The results at all NCPAP levels were referenced to VF-NCPAP values at 8 cm H2O. Provision of NCPAP with either device decreased inspiratory work of breathing, tidal volume, and minute ventilation relative to NCPAP of 0 cm H2O. Bubble NCPAP did not decrease resistive work of breathing relative to 0 cm H2O. Resistive work of breathing (p=0.01), respiratory rate (p<0.03), and phase angle (p=0.002) were all greater with bubble compared to VF-NCPAP. The more labored and asynchronous breathing seen with bubble NCPAP may lead to higher failure rates over the long term than with VF-NCPAP.

Implementation of Bubble Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in a Community Referral Hospital

Implementation of Bubble Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in a Community Referral Hospital

Is the New Definition of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia More Useful?

To determine the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in low birth weight (LBW) infants <1251 g managed with early bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and a gentle ventilation strategy using the newly proposed definition for BPD and the previous definitions. Needs for supplemental oxygen and positive pressure (positive pressure ventilation or NCPAP) during initial hospitalization were evaluated in 266 inborn LBW infants (birth weight <1251 g). The data were categorized in three weight groups, <751, 751 to 1000 and 1001 to 1250 g and the incidence of BPD was computed in survivors based on oxygen need at 28 days, 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) and the new severity of BPD criteria, that is, mild BPD: need for supplemental oxygen > or =28 days, but not at 36 weeks PMA; moderate BPD: need for supplemental oxygen > or =28 days and <30% at 36 weeks PMA and severe BPD: need for supplemental oxygen > or =28 days, and >30% at 36 weeks PMA and/or positive pressure at 36 weeks PMA. Further, BPD-associated comorbidities and short-term outcome data during hospitalization were compared among the groups, defined by severity of BPD. Among LBW infants <1251 g, the incidences of BPD at 28 days and 36 weeks PMA were 21.1 and 7.4% respectively. Using the newly defined criteria, the incidences of mild, moderate and severe BPD were 13.5, 4.8 and 2.6%, respectively. In total, 64.6% of these infants had mild BPD and 70.8% weighed <751 g at birth. Associated comorbidities correlated significantly with grades of underlying pulmonary disease. Also, significantly longer hospital stay, discharge at a higher PMA and lower growth velocity was observed with increasing grades of BPD. The new system for grading the severity of BPD offers a better description of underlying pulmonary disease and correlates with the infant's maturity, growth and overall severity of illness. Whether it will have a role in predicting long-term outcome remains to be determined.