IN 1832 THOMAS BABINGTON MACAULAY, a fervent supporter of the recent Reform Act in Britain, contested the new borough of Leeds for the Whigs. His Tory opponent was Michael Thomas Sadler, England's most prominent advocate of a factory act that would limit the hours and conditions of work for children. The few Leeds workingmen enfranchised by the Reform Act supported Sadler who had opposed the Reform Act. So did William Cobbett whose memorable laments for the passing of rural England and vigorous denunciations of the 'Satanic mills' inspired future generations of English radicals. Macaulay had no patience with such antique arguments in the new age: 'As I am for freedom of discussion and worship, so I am also for freedom of trade. I am for a system under which we may sell where we can sell dearest and buy where we can buy cheapest.' When challenged at a public debate on the effects of free trade on children, Macaulay declared that if 'the labouring classes expect any great relief from any [factory act] they are under a great delusion.' Macaulay won the election principally because of strong support from the newly enfranchised bourgeoisie. In that election, his biographer writes, 'his belief in the saving power of free trade won out over any solicitude he may have felt for the plight of the working class in Leeds.'(f.1) Or, for that matter, the plight of their children.Professor of History, University of Waterloo, and chair of the House of Commons Subcommittee on Sustainable Human Development.I would like to thank several people who helped me to understand these issues. Gerry Schmitz. the outstanding researcher for the Library of Parliament, was of enormous assistance. Gordon Shields, my assistant, understood the issue well and was indefatigable in working on the report. Christine Fisher, Landon Pearson, and my committee colleagues. Maud Debien, Keith Martin, John Godfrey, Beryl Gaffney. and Eleni Bakopanos, were helpful. thoughtful, and generous with their time.During the campaign Macaulay denounced Sadler as a 'hyena,' a wild beast who would lure the unwary into its den through its 'singular knack of imitating the cries of little children.' Macaulay knew well the effect of the 'cries of little children' for his father was Zachary Macaulay, the great evangelical anti-slavery leader. The British abolitionist movement had used most effectively the cries of little children to undermine support for free trade in humans, but Zachary Macaulay's son had long ago abandoned his early evangelical principles in favour of the political and economic liberalism which held sway in Victorian Britain. That liberalism, he believed, was responsible for the 'beautiful factories' and the 'magnificent' cities of nineteenth century Britain. Those who reminded him of the 'cries of little children' longed for an imagined past and ignored the promise of the revolution of his times.(f.2)Those cries bother Macaulay's heirs today as they celebrate the remarkable victories of economic and political liberalism over the last fifteen years. Macaulay feared, probably correctly, that restricting the hours of work for children would lead to limiting the hours for adult workers. Where would it all end, he asked - likely with British textile workers unemployed, their children poorer, and the British buying cheaper clothes from lands where wages were lower. There were, he urged, no easy solutions, but surely 'judicious legislation promoting trade' would ultimately prove the best choice. His arguments find their modern echoes in G-7 and international development bank conferences, in the business pages of the Globe and Mail, in editorials in the Economist, and in James Cooper's article in this journal. Sadler, however, finds contemporary echoes too, modern 'hyenas' imitating the cries of children in unlit, unventilated 'Satanic mills' in Pakistan, India, and Central America.When Prime Minister Jean Chretien took Team Canada to south Asia in January 1996, Craig Keilburger, a 13-year-old activist, captured as much time as the prime minister on CNN and Canadian television as he excoriated the Indian government for its tolerance of exploitative child labour. …