It is unusual, in my experience, for students to leave the London School Economics (LSE) less ambitious and career-oriented than when they arrived. But this was clearly the experience a young American who spent a year graduate study at the School from 1949 to 1950. William Stringfellow went on to lead an extraordinary and inspirational life as a practicing lawyer and political activist, all the while speaking and writing as a theologian who was praised by Karl Barth in 1962 as the man America should listen to.1 His year at the LSE appears to have been a critical turning point, to which he would refer back almost as his moment conversion. This paper will explore the nature that transition in Stringfellows understanding himself and his leadership aspirations. We will then see how this is reflected in later writings about the leadership both the church and the secular world to glean three lessons in church leadership that may be relevance to todays debates on this issue.When he arrived in London, William Stringfellow was an industrious high achiever who was already a leader. He was on the council the Student Christian Movement in America and president the United Student Christian Council, which he represented at the World Conference Christian Youth in Oslo in 1947. He also attended the inaugural assembly the World Council Churches in Amsterdam in 1948, aged twenty. In his reference to the LSE, the dean Bates College (where he had completed undergraduate studies) wrote, continue to be amazed that Mr. Stringfellow is able to be a straight A student and do so many other things, and do them well, while at the same time he is now and then away from the campus on his church youth movements for days at a time.2Stringfellow came to the LSE to study the impact Christianity on British political life. This was near the end the postwar Labour Government, when the influence Christian Socialism, through Archbishop Temple and others, was having its greatest impact on British society. have become aware, wrote Stringfellow in his LSE application statement, of the impact which Christians have had upon contemporary British political life.... influence William Temple and the Malvern Conference is also a special concern I hold.3 While he already had the intention going on to study law,4 his own aspiration to a political career was clearly being explored at this time.Yet he took the decision in the course this year to abandon such ambitions, expressed in the gospel language dying to self. He would write in A Simplicity Faith in 1982, was politically ambitious in my student days. But I had died to that during the time that I was a research fellow in England at the London School Economics. It was then that I determined not to pursue politics as a career.5 This was part a wider rejection career in favor the concept vocation:[While at the LSE] I had elected then to pursue no career. To put it theologically, I died to the idea career and to the whole typical array mundane calculations, grandiose goals, and appropriate schemes to reach them. I renounced, simultaneously, the embellishments-like money, power, success-associated with careers in American culture, along with the ethics requisite to obtaining such condiments. I do not say this haughtily; this was an aspect my conversion to the gospel, so, in fact, I say it humbly.6Given its impact on his later life, I am naturally curious about what happened during this period in London. Frustratingly, the William Stringfellow archive at Cornell University contains little material from this period and the LSE itself has no record any completed dissertation. In his end-of-year report form Stringfellow writes, The intention is, upon my return to the United States, to complete this assignment in manuscript form so that it may be published for use by groups Christian Students in the United States. …