FIFTY YEARS AGO, in 1930, the Royal Geographical Society last organized a series like this one?on that occasion, to celebrate its hundredth year. For the purpose of a searching review of the state of the geographical art, it was in a sense the best of times and the worst of times. The best, because one great founding aim of the Society had been realized: the habitable globe had been explored, and its resources?so far as they could then be known?mapped and charted. The worst, because geography was at that time on the eve of a series of revolutions: revolutions of a fundamental intellectual nature, that were to reverberate through its academic establishment over the succeeding half century, basically affecting its subject matter, its concepts and tech? niques, and its attitudes towards the world that geographers inhabit and try to comprehend. More than any other aspect of geography, those revolutions have affected the human part of it, the part that seeks to understand how people live and work together in geographical space. So in one sense, my task today is impossible: I could not adequately chart, within the space of one hour, the changes that have occurred. And in another sense, it is superfluous: very distinguished recent books by colleagues, appearing over the past couple of years, have more than adequately analysed the evol? ution of human geography. I refer particularly to Michael Chisholm's Human Geography: Evolution or Revolution (Chisholm, 1975) and Ron Johnston's very recent Geography and Geographers (Johnston, 1979). We know where we stand, and how we have got here. The task as I see it tonight is rather different?and interestingly, Ron Johnston's account does not touch on my theme at all. It is to try to show how, in the last halfcentury and in this country, some human geographers have tried better to understand the geography of society in order to contribute to changing it through planning. One of the outstanding traditions of British geography of the past half-century, I want to argue, has been in applied geography, particularly in the relation of geography to the planning process. In telling that tale, 1930 has almost a legendary appropriateness as a starting date; it is almost as if the Society chose its anniversaries for the purpose. For it was in 1930 that Dudley Stamp, then Ernest Cassel Reader in Geography at the London School of Economies, took the first steps to set up his Land Utilisation Survey of Great Britain. He described it to the Society at an afternoon lecture on 16 February 1931 (Stamp, 1931), and later in more detail in his book The Land of Britain: its Use and Misuse (Stamp, 1962). He started in a way that would seem extraordinary to a latterday geographical generation, reared on research councils and research grants. Following the tradition that Sidney Webb had followed when he set up the London School of Economies and Political Science (LSE) in 1894, he went out and begged for money. He did so with the magical success that followed him all his professional life. In less than a decade the survey was substantially complete, the result of an amazing
Read full abstract