Bridge To Transplantation Research Articles

A pilot study of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for relapsed/refractory primary and secondary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL and SCNSL).

2006 Background: Prognosis of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CNSL is poor with no standard of care treatment options. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) has shown efficacy in R/R systemic large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and could be considered for R/R CNSL. Methods: We conducted a pilot study of axi-cel in patients with R/R CNS LBCL. No bridging therapy except corticosteroids was allowed after enrollment. Ommaya reservoir was placed before infusion. Patients underwent lymphodepletion with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide followed by axi-cel dosing of 2x106 cells/kg intravenous infusion. The study enrolled 18 patients, of whom the first 6 patients were observed for treatment-limiting toxicities (TLTs). Primary endpoint was safety, measured by rate of TLTs and grade 3+ adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Exploratory analyses include paired peripheral blood (PB) and CSF analyses for axi-cel pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, flow cytometry, single-cell RNA-Seq. Results: We report the results of the entire cohort of 18 patients (13 PCNSL, 4 SCNSL, 1 concurrent systemic & ocular L) enrolled. Median age was 62 years (33-80), 8/18 were women. Median number of prior therapies was 3 (1-7). No TLTs were observed; 16/18 (89%) patients developed cytokine release syndrome/CRS (grade 3+, 0%); 8/18 (44%) developed immune effector cell-associated neurologic syndrome/ICANS, 5/18 (28%) grade 3+. Two patients developed Ommaya-related meningitis requiring explant with recovery. One patient had grade 3 seizures that resolved with anti-epileptic agents. The ORR was 94% (17/18); 67% CR (12/18). The median time to best response was 3 months. As of January 25, 2024, the median follow up was 24.2 months, median DOR 13.4 months and 9 patients had progressed. The median PFS was 14.3 months (95% CI: 6.3-NR) and median OS, 26.4 months (95% CI: 11.2-NR). Seven patients have died, all from disease progression. At the time of presentation, there will be a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Correlative data on all 18 patients will be presented at the meeting. Axi-cel pharmacokinetics in the first 12 CNSL patients was similar to that previously reported for DLBCL patients without CNS involvement in ZUMA-1 and ZUMA-7. Patients with CR demonstrated increased peak levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. CSF CAR T cells exhibit Type I interferon (IFN) transcriptomic signature compared to proliferative signature in blood. Conclusions: Axi-cel was safe and well-tolerated in CNSL patients with encouraging efficacy and median PFS and durability of response of more than 1 year. There was no apparent additional risk of adverse neurologic events including ICANS from axi-cel. Clinical trial information: NCT04608487 .

Clonal Hematopoiesis is Associated With Severe Cytokine Release Syndrome in Patients Treated With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CART) Therapy

Among patients receiving CD19 or B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CAR T therapy, inflammation pre- and post-CAR T infusion is implicated in the development of toxicities including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and likely contributes to prolonged cytopenias. Clonal hematopoiesis (CH), the clonal expansion of hematopoietic stem cells harboring somatic mutations, has been associated with inflammasome upregulation. Herein, we examined the prevalence of pre-CAR T CH in a predominantly transplant-naïve cohort of recipients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or multiple myeloma (MM), and assessed the relationship between the presence of CH mutations and CAR T-related outcomes including CRS, ICANS, prolonged cytopenia, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). This study included 62 patients with NHL or MM who underwent CD19 or BCMA CAR T therapy from 2017 to 2022 at City of Hope and had available pre-CAR T cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). DNA was isolated with QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) from PBMC samples (94% collected <30d of CART infusion), on which we performed targeted exome sequencing (108 pre-defined gene panel with 1000x sequencing depth) to determine the presence of CH (variant allele frequency [VAF] ≥2%). Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between CH and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery at day +30 and +60, maximum grade CRS and ICANS, grade <2 versus 2+, and OS and PFS at 1y. Covariates considered were age at CART, baseline ANC, sex, race, CAR-HEMATOTOX, LDH, bridging therapy (Y/N), and number of prior lines of therapy. Fifteen (24%) patients had at least one pathogenic CH mutation; 2 (13%) had ≥2 CH mutations concurrently. DMT3A mutations were the most common; 29% of mutations had VAFs >10%. Patients with CH were significantly more likely to develop grade ≥2 CRS (60% versus 28%, p = .03) compared to those without CH (odds ratio [OR] 3.9, 95% CI 1.2-13.2; p = .027). Accounting for baseline ANC (which was higher among the CH cohort and associated with delayed ANC recovery, p = .02) patients with CH did not have a significantly different rate of delayed ANC recovery compared to those without CH (adjusted OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.09-1.5; p = .17). There was no association between CH and ICANS, nor with 1y PFS or OS. CH was frequent (24%) in this cohort of CAR T recipients and was associated with a higher risk of development of grade ≥2 CRS after CAR T. Additional validation studies are currently underway, which may set the stage for consideration of pre-CAR T CH as a biomarker for risk stratification towards more proactive CRS prophylaxis. Translational studies could aim to prove a direct relationship between CH-mutated myeloid cells and CRS.

Combination of pirtobrutinib and lentiviral transduced bispecific anti-CD20/CD19 (LV20.19) CAR T-cell therapy to improve outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma.

7043 Background: Combination trials of BTK inhibitors (BTKi) with CAR-T have suggested potential synergistic benefit by improving CAR-T immunophenotype and clinical outcomes but are limited by increased toxicity. We report immunophenotype, cytokine profile, and patient outcomes with the new non-covalent BTKi, pirtobrutinib (pirto) when given prior to LV20.19 CAR-T and compare the final CAR product to pts who did not receive pirtobrutinib prior to CAR. Methods: Pts received LV20.19 CAR-T as part of a phase 1/2 trial (NCT04186520). Only pts who received pirto £4 weeks prior to apheresis were included. To determine the impact of pirto on LV20.19 CAR-T, we calculated both polyfunctionality (PFA) and polyfunctional strength index (PSI) for each product using the Isoplexis. Descriptive statistics, t-tests and Kaplan-Meier method were used as appropriate. Results: 11 pts received pirto prior to LV20.19 CAR-T (Table). Median age was 65 (50-80) yrs and median prior lines of therapy were 4 (2-8). There were 4 MCL pts, 5 Richter’s (RT)/CLL, 1 MZL and 1 DLBCL. Median duration of pirto was 4 (1-20) mo. Pts were on pirto for a median of 12 (1-22) days prior to apheresis. All except 1 pts received target CAR-T dose. The day 28 ORR was 82% (CR=7, PR=2). After a median follow up of 13 mo, 3 pts died (PD, Covid, Guillain Barre). The median PFS and OS were both 30.8 mo while the 1-year PFS and OS rates were 9 and 15 mo respectively. 9 pts had CRS and 2 had ICANS, all grades 1-2, while 4 had IEC-HS. One pt had afib recurrence and 1 pt had CMV viremia within 30 days of CAR-T. Among the pts with immunophenotypic data (n=10), there were no differences in naïve or more differentiated T-cell percentages in apheresis and final CAR-T products when compared to pts who did not receive pirto before LV20.19 CAR-T (n=57). Although not statistically significant, both PFA (CD4=61.8 vs 59, CD8= 49.8 vs 46.9) and PSI (CD4= 1752 vs 1608, CD8=1299 vs 1079) were higher with pirto pre-treated pts, suggesting a potential trend towards improved CAR-T functionality. Conclusions: These data represent the largest experience of pirto prior to CAR-T apheresis and demonstrate that pirto can be safely used as a bridge to LV20.19 CAR-T without negatively impacting their immunophenotype and potentially improving functionality. These data support our planned phase 1 clinical trial to assess the safety of pirto as bridging and maintenance therapy with LV20.19 CAR-T (NCT05990465). [Table: see text]

Obecabtagene autoleucel (obe-cel, AUTO1) in adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL): Overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and the potential impact of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell persistency and consolidative stem cell transplantation (SCT) in the open-label, single-arm FELIX phase Ib/II study.

6504 Background: Obe-cel is an autologous CAR-T cell product with a fast off-rate CD19 binder designed to mitigate immunotoxicity and improve expansion/persistence. Pooled results from the pivotal FELIX phase Ib/II study (NCT04404660) of obe-cel in adults with R/R B-ALL were recently presented (Roddie C et al. Blood 2023;142[Suppl 1]:222). Here, OS and EFS in all patients (pts) treated with obe-cel are reported, alongside the impact of CAR-T cell persistency and consolidative SCT for pts in remission. Methods: Pts aged ≥18 yrs with R/R B-ALL were enrolled. CAR-T products were generated via an automated process (Roddie C et al. Blood 2023;142[Suppl 1]:222). Pts received bridging therapy as appropriate and underwent lymphodepletion (fludarabine, 4×30mg/m2; cyclophosphamide, 2×500mg/m2), followed by obe-cel split dose infusions on Days 1 and 10 based on pre-lymphodepletion leukemic burden at a target dose of 410×106 CAR-T cells. Results: A total of 127/153 (83%) enrolled pts were infused. At screening, pts’ median age was 47 yrs; 42%/31%/44% had received prior blinatumomab/inotuzumab ozogamicin/allogeneic SCT; median bone marrow blast burden was 36% (range: 0−100). At data cut-off (13 September 2023), median follow-up was 16.6 mos (range 3.7−36.6 mos). The overall complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery rate among infused pts was 78%. Among responding pts, 17/99 (17%) proceeded to consolidative SCT while in remission; all 17 (100%) were in measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission (≤10–4 leukemic blasts) and 10/17 (59%) showed CAR-T cell persistency prior to SCT. Loss of CAR-T cell persistency was associated with a hazard risk of relapse or death 2.9 times compared with pts who had ongoing CAR-T cell persistency. Pts who experienced B-cell recovery had a hazard risk of relapse or death 1.7 times compared with pts without B-cell recovery. At 12 mos, the EFS rate was 50% and 43% with or without censoring for consolidative SCT or new therapies, respectively; the OS rate was 61% and 59% with or without censoring for SCT, respectively. Conclusions: Ongoing CAR-T cell persistency and B-cell aplasia were associated with improved EFS without further consolidation post-obe-cel. At the current follow-up, consolidative SCT for pts in MRD-negative remission post-obe-cel did not improve EFS or OS. Clinical trial information: NCT04404660 .

ATHENA: A phase 1/2 study of AZD5851, a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy directed against GPC3 in adult patients with advanced/recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

TPS2675 Background: Checkpoint inhibitor therapy is the standard first-line treatment for advanced/recurrent HCC, but there is a significant unmet therapeutic need for patients (pts) who progress after first-line treatment. Adoptive cellular immunotherapy may provide a novel treatment option. Glypican-3 (GPC3), a heparan sulfate proteoglycan, is overexpressed by tumor cells in HCC and virtually absent in healthy tissues, making it an ideal target for CAR-T therapy. AZD5851 is an autologous CAR-T product that expresses a CAR specific for GPC3 and a dominant negative (dn)TGFβRII as an armoring strategy. Expression of dnTGFβRII can block TGFβ signaling, protecting CAR T-cells from the immunosuppressive effects of this cytokine. Early clinical data with C-CAR031, a CAR-T product with the same GPC3-specific CAR and dnTGFβRII-armoring transgene as AZD5851, showed promising tolerability and antitumor activity in pts with HCC [1]. ATHENA (NCT06084884) is a first-in-human, single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of AZD5851 in pts with GPC3+ advanced/recurrent HCC, for whom ≥1 prior line of standard therapy failed or was not tolerable. Methods: Eligible pts are aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced/recurrent or metastatic and/or unresectable HCC, GPC3+ tumor sample as determined by immunohistochemistry, ≥1 prior line of standard systemic therapy, ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1, Child-Pugh A, ECOG PS 0/1, and adequate organ and bone marrow function. Approximately 24 pts will be enrolled in Part A (Phase I, dose escalation) and 50 in Part B (Phase II dose expansion). Pts will undergo apheresis to collect peripheral blood mononuclear cells for AZD5851 production, after which they may receive approved bridging therapy for disease control. Upon successful generation of AZD5851 product, pts will undergo lymphodepletion before receiving a single dose of IV AZD5851. Subsequent follow-up is divided into 3 stages: Stage 1, active follow-up of all pts through 6 months post AZD5851 infusion; Stage 2, further evaluation of pts who have not progressed or started a new anticancer regimen during Stage 1; Stage 3, long-term follow-up for all pts who have received AZD5851. The primary endpoints are to assess the safety/tolerability of AZD5851 (both study parts), and to determine the recommended dose(s) of AZD5851 for expansion and phase 2 trials (Part A). Secondary endpoints include efficacy (objective response rate, best overall response, duration of response, disease control rate, durable response rate, time to response, progression-free survival, and overall survival) and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints include pharmacodynamic biomarkers and immunogenicity. Enrollment began Nov 2023. 1. Zhang et al. AACR 2023. Abstract CT097. Clinical trial information: NCT06084884 .

Impact of extramedullary multiple myeloma on outcomes with idecabtagene vicleucel.

7508 Background: Idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) has demonstrated excellent efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, outcomes in patients with extramedullary disease (EMD) remain to be better characterized. Methods: We included patients from 11 US academic centers, who were evaluated for EMD and were infused with ide-cel between May 2021 and April 2023. Patients with soft tissue or visceral lesions non-contiguous from bony lesions were classified as having true EMD, with paraskeletal disease classified as non-EMD. Disease responses were evaluated using the IMWG criteria. Time-to-event analyses were performed from the date of ide-cel infusion. Results: Among 351 patients with RRMM treated with ide-cel, 84 (24%) had EMD prior to infusion. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 18.2 months (95% CI: 17-19.3). Baseline characteristics at ide-cel infusion for EMD and non-EMD cohorts are depicted in the table. For the EMD and non-EMD cohorts, the Day 30 objective response rates (ORR) were 58% vs. 69% (p=0.1), Day 30 ≥complete response rates were 16% vs 24% (p=0.11), the Day 90 ORR were 52% vs 82% (p&lt;0.001), and best ORR were 58% vs 82%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.3 months (95% CI: 4.1-6.9) for the EMD cohort vs. 11.1 months (95% CI: 9.2-12.6; p&lt;0.0001) for the non-EMD cohort. The median duration of response for EMD among day 30 responders was 6.4 months (95% CI: 5.1-8.4). In a multivariable analysis, EMD was an independent predictor of inferior PFS [hazard ratio 1.8 (95% CI: 1.2-2.5), p&lt;0.001] after adjusting for ECOG status, revised ISS stage, penta-drug refractoriness, elevated ferritin, prior BCMA-directed therapy and use of bridging therapy. Pattern of progression in the EMD cohort (n=68/84) included EMD site only (21%), hematologic only (22%), or both (57%), with comparable PFS for type of progression (p=0.19). The median overall survival (OS) was 14.8 months [95% CI: 9-Not reached (NR)] for EMD and 26.9 months [95% CI: 26.3 vs NR, p=0.006)] for the non-EMD group. Rates of Grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity syndrome were comparable between the two cohorts. Conclusions: Patients with EMD demonstrate significantly inferior Day 90 ORR and presence of EMD is an independent risk factor for inferior PFS. [Table: see text]

Use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for trauma and its performance in Japan over the past 18 years: a nationwide descriptive study

BackgroundResuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been used to control massive hemorrhages. Although there is no consensus on the efficacy of REBOA, it remains an option as a bridging therapy in non-trauma centers where trauma surgeons are not available. To better understand the current landscape of REBOA application, we examined changes in its usage, target population, and treatment outcomes in Japan, where immediate hemostasis procedures sometimes cannot be performed.MethodsThis retrospective observational study used the Japan Trauma Data Bank data. All cases in which REBOA was performed between January 2004 and December 2021 were included. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality rate. We analyzed mortality trends over time according to the number of cases, number of centers, severity of injury, and overall and subgroup mortality associated with REBOA usage. We performed a logistic analysis of mortality trends over time, adjusting for probability of survival based on the trauma and injury severity score.ResultsOverall, 2557 patients were treated with REBOA and were deemed eligible for inclusion. The median age of the participants was 55 years, and male patients constituted 65.3% of the study population. Blunt trauma accounted for approximately 93.0% of the cases. The number of cases and facilities that used REBOA increased until 2019. While the injury severity score and revised trauma score did not change throughout the observation period, the hospital mortality rate decreased from 91.3 to 50.9%. The REBOA group without severe head or spine injuries showed greater improvement in mortality than the all-patient group using REBOA and all-trauma patient group. The greatest improvement in mortality was observed in patients with systolic blood pressure ≥ 80 mmHg. The adjusted odds ratios for hospital mortality steadily declined, even after adjusting for the probability of survival.ConclusionsWhile there was no significant change in patient severity, mortality of patients treated with REBOA decreased over time. Further research is required to determine the reasons for these improvements in trauma care.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Evolving Role of Systemic Therapies as a Bridging Treatment to Liver Transplantation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Classically, liver transplantation (LT) can be curative for HCC tumors within the Milan criteria. Bridging strategies to reduce the dropouts from LT waiting lists and/or to downstage patients who are beyond the Milan criteria are widely utilized. We conducted a literature-based review to evaluate the role of systemic therapies as a bridging treatment to liver transplantation (LT) in HCC patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can be used as a systemic bridging therapy to LT in patients with contraindications for locoregional liver-directed therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment can be utilized either as a monotherapy or as a combination therapy with bevacizumab or TKIs prior to LT. Acute rejection after liver transplantation is a concern in the context of ICI treatment. Thus, a safe ICI washout period before LT and cautious post-LT immunosuppression strategies are required to reduce post-LT rejections and to optimize clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, prospective clinical trials are needed to establish definitive conclusions about the utility of systemic therapy as a bridging modality prior to LT in HCC patients.

Clinical Outcomes With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Interstitial Lung Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The evidence on indications, outcomes, and complications with the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the setting of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is limited in the existing literature. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of ECMO in the setting of ILD to study the prognostic factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Eighteen unique studies with a total of 1,356 patients on ECMO for ILD were identified out of which 76.5% were on ECMO as a bridge to transplant (BTT) and the rest as a bridge to recovery (BTR). The overall in-hospital mortality was 45.76%, with 71.3% and 37.8% for BTR and BTT, respectively. Among the various prognostic factors, mortality was lower with younger age (mean difference = 3.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82-5.49), use of awake veno-arterial (VA)-ECMO compared to veno-venous (VV)-ECMO (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.13-0.37) in the overall cohort. In the setting of BTT, the use of VA-ECMO had a decreased hazard ratio (HR) compared to VV-ECMO (adjusted HR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.15-0.81, p = 0.015). The findings of our meta-analysis are critical but are derived from retrospective studies with small sample sizes and thus are of low to very low-GRADE certainty.

30-Day and 1-Year Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The Impact of Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty as a Bridging Therapy in a Portuguese Tertiary Center

Introduction. Since the advent and development of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the contemporary era, balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has seen renewed interest. We aimed to compare 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality between patients submitted to BAV as a bridging therapy before definite TAVR and patients submitted directly to TAVR. Methods. This was an observational, retrospective study of patients who underwent TAVR between 2009 and 2022 in a tertiary center. Patients with severe aortic stenosis (SAS) who underwent TAVR without prior BAV (woBAV group) and patients who were performed TAVR with prior BAV (wBAV group) as a bridging therapy were included. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year after TAVR between wBAV and woBAV groups. Results. 800 patients were included, of which 767 were in woBAV group and 33 were in wBAV group. 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 21% in wBAV group compared to 4.4% in woBAV (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 5.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3–11.7, p &lt; 0.001). At 1-year, all-cause mortality rate was 27% in wBAV group compared to 12% in woBAV group (unadjusted HR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.28–5.10, p = 0.007). After covariate adjustments, mortality remained significantly higher in wBAV group. Conclusion. This study provides valuable insights into the outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR with prior BAV as bridging therapy, as these patients had higher mortality at 30 days and 1 year compared to patients direct to TAVR.

Donor-Recipient Chimeric Cell Transplantation as the Bridging Therapy for Mitigating Total Body Irradiation-Induced Injury.

In recent years, cell-based therapies have emerged as a promising approach for mitigating radiation-induced injury. Acute radiation syndrome (ARS) results from exposure to high doses of radiation over a short time period. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of donor-recipient chimeric cell (DRCC) therapy in mitigating ARS induced by a total body irradiation (TBI) dose of 10 gray (Gy). Thirty irradiated Lewis rats were employed as ARS models to assess the efficacy of systemic-intraosseous transplantation of different cellular therapies in five experimental groups (n = 6/group): saline control, isogenic bone marrow transplantation (isoBMT), allogeneic BMT (alloBMT), DRCC, and alloBMT+DRCC. DRCC were created by polyethylene glycol-mediated fusion of bone marrow cells from 24 ACI (RT1a) and 24 Lewis (RT11) rat donors. The creation of DRCC and chimeric state was confirmed by flow cytometry (FC) and confocal microscopy (CM). Recovery of blood parameters was evaluated through complete blood count analysis. Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) signs were assessed clinically and histopathologically using kidney, skin, and small intestine biopsies. FC and CM confirmed the fusion feasibility and the chimeric state of DRCC. A 100% mortality rate was observed in the saline control group, whereas a 100% survival was recorded following DRCC transplantation, correlating with significant recovery of peripheral blood parameters. In addition, no clinical or histopathological signs of GvHD were observed after DRCC and alloBMT+DRCC transplantation. These findings confirm efficacy of DRCC in mitigating GvHD, promoting hematopoietic recovery, and increasing animal survival following TBI-induced ARS. Moreover, tolerogenic and immunomodulatory properties of DRCC therapy support its feasibility for clinical applications. Therefore, this study introduces DRCC as an innovative bridging therapy for alleviating the acute effects of TBI, with broad implications for stem cell research and regenerative medicine.

Effectiveness and safety of bridging therapy and endovascular therapy in patients with large cerebral infarctions: from ANGEL-ASPECT

Background and purposeThe benefits of thrombolytic therapy before endovascular thrombectomy in cases of acute ischaemic stroke, with a large infarction volume, remain unclear. This analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness...

Outcomes of Budesonide as a Treatment Option for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Colitis in Patients with Cancer.

Current treatment guidelines for moderate to severe colitis (IMC) secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) recommend systemic corticosteroids as the primary therapy in conjunction with biologics, namely infliximab and/or vedolizumab. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of oral budesonide in the treatment of IMC. We performed a retrospective analysis at MD Anderson Cancer Center of adult cancer patients with a confirmed (based on clinical, radiographic and laboratory assessment) diagnosis of IMC between 1 January 2015 and 31 November 2022, treated with budesonide. Data collection included demographics, oncologic history, IMC-related information and outcomes up to 6 months after the last dose of ICI. Our sample (n = 69) comprised primarily of Caucasian (76.8%) females (55.1%). The majority of patients received combination therapy with anti-PD-1/L1 and anti-CTLA-4 (49.3%), and the most common malignancy treated was melanoma (37.6%). The median grade of diarrhea was 3 and of colitis was 2. Of the 50 patients who underwent endoscopic evaluation, a majority had non-ulcerative inflammation (64%) and active colitis on histology (78%). Budesonide was used as primary treatment at onset of IMC in 56.5% patients, as well as a bridging therapy from systemic corticosteroids in 33.3%. Less than half of the patients (44.9%) required additional therapies such as biologics or fecal microbiota transplant. Additionally, 75.3% of patients achieved full remission of IMC and 24.6% had a recurrence of IMC. ICI was resumed in 31.9% of patients and 17.4% received other forms of cancer therapies. Budesonide may be an effective strategy to treat and prevent the recurrence of IMC. The remission rates observed in our analysis with budesonide alone are comparable to systemic corticosteroids. Patients that require an extended duration of steroid exposure and those with moderate to severe colitis may benefit from budesonide given its lower risk of infection and complications. Furthermore, we observe that budesonide may serve as a successful bridge from systemic corticosteroids with subsequent biologic treatment. Larger prospective studies are necessary to determine the role of budesonide as well as its safety profile.

Impact of cladribine, cytarabine, and G-CSF (CLAG) as a bridging therapy prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

The combination of cladribine, cytarabine, and G-CSF (CLAG) has exhibited robust synergistic anti-leukemia activity as an induction therapy (IT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the impact of CLAG as a bridging therapy (BT) administered between IT and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML remains uncertain. In this retrospective study, we examined the efficacy of CLAG as a transitional strategy prior to allo-HSCT in R/R AML. We included 234 patients with R/R AML who received the modified busulfan plus cyclophosphamide conditioning regimen for allo-HSCT in our center during the past 6years, performed a propensity-score matching analysis, partitioned them into four distinct cohorts, and further integrated them into the CLAG group and non-CLAG group based on response to IT and utilization of CLAG. Our cohorts encompassed 12 patients in Cohort A (modified composite complete remission (mCRc) after IT, CLAG), 31 in Cohort B (mCRc after IT, non-CLAG), 35 in Cohort C (non-complete remission (non-CR) after IT, CLAG), and 80 in Cohort D (non-CR after IT, non-CLAG). Intriguingly, among patients with non-CR status, the administration of CLAG correlated with a notably statistically diminished risk of relapse and improved survival at 2-year follow-up (Cohort C vs. Cohort D). Employing CLAG as a BT prior to allo-HSCT demonstrates substantial effectiveness, a relative degree of safety, and manageable toxicity in selected R/R AML cases.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Before Liver Transplantation May Increase the Risk of Rejection: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) represent a major breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy. Several molecules have shown efficacy in HCC and are increasingly used as a bridging therapy before liver transplantation. Initial reports have raised concern about severe rejections in patients following ICI therapy. Aims This meta-analysis assesses the risk of neoadjuvant ICI therapy before liver transplantation. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase for studies including all patients treated with ICI therapy before liver transplantation from a given center. A random-effects model was applied to pooled results with a priori determined subgroup analyses. Results Eight studies published during the past three years fulfilled all inclusion criteria. All studies are noncomparative case series, one prospective, and seven retrospective. Studies included 52 patients who received various PD1 inhibitors between 1 and 253 days prior to liver transplantation. Patients treated with an ICI ahead of transplantation demonstrated an overall relative risk (RR) of 2.5 [95% CI: 1.4-3.8] for an acute rejection event. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis showed that patients who received PD1 inhibitors up to 30 days (RR 7.2 [95% CI: 4.9-10.5]) or between 30 and 60 days (RR 7.2 [95% CI: 5.1-10.3]) prior to liver transplantation suffered a higher rejection risk than patients with a “washout period” beyond 60 days (RR 1.8 [95% CI: 0.6-4.9]). The ICI, age, and underlying etiology were insignificant for RR in their subgroup analysis. Conclusion PD1 inhibitors within two months of liver transplantation may significantly elevate rejection risk. This meta-analysis provides valuable insights to inform clinical decision-making. Nevertheless, future trials remain imperative to establish definitive guidelines.

Blinatumomab Bridge Therapy for Mitigating Chemotoxicity in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blinatumomab Bridge Therapy for Mitigating Chemotoxicity in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell infusion for large B-cell lymphoma in complete remission: a center for international blood and marrow transplant research analysis.

CD19 CAR T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is commonly administered to patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL), but salvage or bridging therapy can sometimes lead to a complete response (CR) prior to infusion. Limited studies have assessed the outcomes of patients infused in CR. A total of 134 patients with LBCL in CR prior to CAR-T infusion were identified from the CIBMTR registry, with median prior lines of therapy of 3 (range 2-9). At two years post-infusion, the probability of progression-free survival was 43.5% (95% CI 34.4-52.8) and the probability of overall survival was 63.8% (95% CI 54.4-72.6). The cumulative incidence rates of non-relapse mortality and relapse/progression at two years were 9.2% (95% CI 4.5-15.4) and 47.3% (95% CI 38.2-56.6), respectively. The rate of grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were 2.2% and 8.2%, respectively. In summary, CAR-T in heavily pretreated patients with LBCL who are in CR following two or more lines of prior therapy demonstrate that a subset of patients may remain free of progression at two years. Additionally, the toxicity profile was impressive with very low rates of grade 3 CRS and ICANS.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin as a bridging therapy to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with refractory/relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Inotuzumab ozogamicin as a bridging therapy to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with refractory/relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Abstract PO1-17-10: Impact of COVID19 on neoadjuvant endocrine therapy use in breast cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is associated with similar response rates as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC), with less toxicity. While gene expression assays such as the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) have led to decreased chemotherapy use in early HR+/HER2- BC, NET is often underutilized. In 2020, the COVID19 pandemic led to disruption in oncologic care, including cancellation of surgeries. Guidelines for BC management during the pandemic recommended NET for HR+/HER2- BC patients unable to obtain surgery due to pandemic restrictions. We evaluated NET use in 2020, compared to NET use in prior years. Methods: Female pts with nonmetastatic HR+/HER2- BC diagnosed between 2016 and 2020 were identified from the 2004-2020 National Cancer Database (NCDB). Annual number of pts receiving NET, and duration of use, were compared between years, and characteristics of pts treated with and without NET were evaluated within and across years, using Chi-squared test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. Results: 554,733 pts met inclusion criteria; 84.50% white, 9.19% Black, 4.06% Asian; 5.88% Hispanic. 25,553 (4.61%) pts received NET. Annual NET use increased slightly between 2016 and 2018 [3.25% vs 3.49% (p=0.021) vs 3.89% (p &amp;lt; 0.0001)], remained stable in 2019 (3.98%), and then increased to 8.67% in 2020 (p &amp;lt; 0.0001). Median duration of NET remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2019 [74 days (d), 68d, 73d and 61d, 2016-2019] but declined in 2020 (56d, p&amp;lt; 0.0001 for 2020 vs 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019). Older age and greater comorbidities were associated with NET use in all years (p &amp;lt; 0.0001). No racial association with NET use was seen in 2016-2018, but Black race was associated with greater NET use in 2019 (p=0.0122) and 2020 (p &amp;lt; 0.0001). Lobular histology, moderate grade, larger tumor size, and node involvement were associated with increased NET use in all years (p &amp;lt; 0.0001). Progesterone receptor positivity (PR+) and lower Ki67 were associated with NET use in 2020 (p=0.0007 and p&amp;lt; 0.0001), but not prior. Median tumor size for pts receiving NET was smaller in 2020 (16mm) compared with prior years (22, 23, 22, and 21mm for 2016-2019, p&amp;lt; 0.0001). Annual RS use increased for all pts between 2016 (34.59%) and 2020 (43.47%). RS use in NET pts was stable in 2016 (27.79%) and 2017 (27.54%), with modest increase in 2018 (29.56%; p 0.094, 2016 vs 2018, p=0.045, 2017 vs 2018), and then increased annually in 2019 (33.28%, p=0.0001) and 2020 (40.64%, p&amp;lt; 0.0001). Median RS was higher in pts receiving NET than in pts who did not in 2016-2019 (p=0.0078, 0.0003, 0.0271, and &amp;lt; 0.0001), but was similar in 2020 (RS=16; IQR 11, 22). Conclusions: Frequency of NET administration more than doubled in 2020, but duration was shorter than in prior years, possibly due to use of NET as “bridging therapy” due to COVID19 restrictions. Black race was associated with receipt of NET in 2020, possibly reflecting disparate impact of COVID19 on Black communities. NET use in 2020 was also associated with smaller tumor size, lower Ki67, and greater likelihood of PR+ disease than in prior years. Use of RS to guide NET increased annually, beginning in 2018. Association of NET with older age, greater comorbidities, higher stage, moderate grade, and lobular histology were seen in all years. Citation Format: Della Makower, Jaeun Choi, Susan Fineberg. Impact of COVID19 on neoadjuvant endocrine therapy use in breast cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-17-10.

Novel insights into the management of rheumatoid arthritis: one year in review 2024.

New evidence from 2023 has slightly shifted some perspectives on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Glucocorticoids have reaffirmed their role as bridging therapy, while novel studies on JAK inhibitors have examined efficacy, mechanism of action, and their potential in high-risk populations, bolstering our understanding with real-world data.Additionally, among treatment strategies, achieving low disease activity has emerged as comparable to achieving remission in the long term, and new insights have been gained regarding tapering both biological and conventional synthetic DMARDs. Furthermore, novel approaches have been proposed for managing difficult-to-treat RA and pre-RA. In this paper, the reviewers aim to present the most relevant studies published during the last year in the field of RA management.