Bridge To Transplantation Research Articles

Local therapy in glioma: An evolving paradigm from history to horizons (Review).

Despite the implementation of multimodal treatments after surgery, glioblastoma (GBM) remains an incurable disease, posing a significant challenge in neuro-oncology. In this clinical setting, local therapy (LT), a developing paradigm, has received significant interest over time due to its potential to overcome the drawbacks of conventional therapy options for GBM. The present review aimed to trace the historical development, highlight contemporary advances and provide insights into the future horizons of LT in GBM management. In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols criteria, a systematic review of the literature on the role of LT in GBM management was conducted. A total of 2,467 potentially relevant articles were found and, after removal of duplicates, 2,007 studies were screened by title and abstract (Cohen's κ coefficient=0.92). Overall, it emerged that 15, 10 and 6 clinical studies explored the clinical efficiency of intraoperative local treatment modalities, local radiotherapy and local immunotherapy, respectively. GBM recurrences occur within 2 cm of the radiation field in 80% of cases, emphasizing the significant influence of local factors on recurrence. This highlights the urgent requirement for LT strategies. In total, three primary reasons have thus led to the development of numerous LT solutions in recent decades: i) Intratumoral implants allow the blood-brain barrier to be bypassed, resulting in limited systemic toxicity; ii) LT facilitates bridging therapy between surgery and standard treatments; and iii) given the complexity of GBM, targeting multiple components of the tumor microenvironment through ligands specific to various elements could have a synergistic effect in treatments. Considering the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of GBM, the disease prognosis could be significantly improved by a combination of therapeutic strategies in the era of precision medicine.

The Evolving Role of Bridging Therapy during CAR-T Therapy.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has gained wide used across an array of hematologic malignancies. Though CAR T therapy has changed outcomes in the treatment of many malignancies its administration can be complicated by delays related to patient-related factors, social barriers, or insurance issues. Because of the lengthy process required to treat a patient with CAR T-cells, bridging therapy (BT), administered after leukapheresis but prior to CAR T infusion, has become an important component of safely administering CAR T therapy. Here we review data supporting the use of BT, factors to consider in patient selection, and types of available BT and rationale for choosing amongst them.

Canadian Rheumatology Association Living Guidelines for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Update #2.

We have updated the Canadian Rheumatology Association (CRA) guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with 3 recommendations for the use of glucocorticoids (GCs). The recommendations address the use of short-term GCs for RA flares or as bridging therapy when disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are initiated or changed, and the use of long-term GCs as adjuncts to DMARDs.

Antiplatelet Therapy and Platelet Activity Testing for Neurointerventional Procedures

The management of antiplatelet medications in neurointerventional procedures remains a subject of considerable variability and debate. This review article explores the diverse clinical practices and the impact of different antiplatelet regimens and platelet activity testing on patient outcomes in neurointerventional treatments. While much of the evidence around antiplatelet therapies largely stems from randomized trials in cardiac and peripheral vascular diseases, their application in neurointerventional settings requires nuanced consideration. Various assays exist to assess individual platelet function, yet the optimal assay, thresholds, and agents remain uncertain due to interpatient variability in medication responsiveness. Expert consensus groups have attempted to standardize antiplatelet management, which is summarized for elective and emergent neurointerventional procedures. Clopidogrel, a commonly used antiplatelet, faces challenges such as genetic variability in metabolism and drug–drug interactions, impacting its effectiveness. Other agents, such as ticagrelor and prasugrel, offer alternatives with different mechanisms of action and potential advantages. Additionally, short‐acting intravenous P2Y 12 inhibitors, such as cangrelor, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors provide options for acute bridging therapy in neurointerventional cases. Despite advancements, significant gaps persist in understanding the optimal antiplatelet management for neurovascular procedures. While platelet function testing is commonly used, its clinical utility and standardization remain an area of investigation. This review underscores the need for further multicenter studies to delineate best practices and optimize patient outcomes in neurointerventional settings.

Clinical outcomes of HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device support with a Bridge to Transplant vs a Destination Therapy strategy: a single-centre retrospective cohort.

Real-world outcomes with the HeartMate3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) depending on whether it's a bridge to transplantation (BTT) or destination therapy (DT) are poorly studied. We aimed to compare the profile and clinical outcomes of patients supported with HeartMate3 according to a BTT or a DT pre-implantation strategy. All patients consecutively implanted with HeartMate3 at our centre (University Hospital of Lausanne, Switzerland) in 2015-2022 were analysed in a retrospective observational study. Indications for HeartMate3 implantation were advanced heart failure despite optimal medical treatment. Patients were treated with a vitamin K antagonist anticoagulant combined with antiplatelet therapy after HeartMate 3 implantation and were followed up monthly at our institution. Among 71 patients implanted with HeartMate3 between 2015 and 2022, 51 (71.8%) were implanted as a BTT and 20 (28.2%) as DT. Their median age was 58 (IQR: 52-69) years and 84% of patients were classified as INTERMACS profiles 2-4. The median follow-up duration was 18.3 (IQR: 7.5-33.9) months. Patients in the DT group were older than those in the BTT group (p <0.001) and had more chronic renal failure (p <0.001). They also had a lower 5-year survival rate (mean ± standard error: 87.3 ± 5.6% vs 49.4 ± 15.1%)and more adverse events such as renal dysfunction requiring temporary perioperative dialysis (p = 0.08) or bleeding (p = 0.06). Although patients supported with HeartMate3 have favourable survival, those with LVAD-DT have poorer outcomes. There is a need to better select patients eligible for LVAD-DT in order to limit the burden of adverse events and improve their prognosis.

Functional Outcome and Hemorrhage Rates After Bridging Therapy With Tenecteplase or Alteplase in Patients With Large Ischemic Core.

IV tenecteplase is an alternative to alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke. Little data are available on its use in patients with large ischemic core. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of both thrombolytics in this population. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with anterior circulation LVO strokes and diffusion-weighed imaging Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (DWI-ASPECTS) ≤5 treated with tenecteplase or alteplase before MT from the TETRIS (tenecteplase) and ETIS (alteplase) French multicenter registries. Primary outcome was reduced disability at 3 months (ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin scale [mRS]). Safety outcomes were 3-month mortality, parenchymal hematoma (PH), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). We used propensity score overlap weighting to reduce baseline differences between treatment groups. We analyzed 647 patients (tenecteplase: n = 194; alteplase: n = 453; inclusion period 2015-2022). Median (interquartile range) age was 71 (57-81) years, with NIH Stroke Scale score 19 (16-22), DWI-ASPECTS 4 (3-5), and last seen well-to-IV thrombolysis and puncture times 165 minutes (130-226) and 260 minutes (203-349), respectively. After MT, the successful reperfusion rate was 83.1%. After propensity score overlap weighting, all baseline variables were well balanced between both treatment groups. Compared with patients treated with alteplase, patients treated with tenecteplase had better 3-month mRS (common odds ratio [OR] for reduced disability: 1.37, 1.01-1.87, p = 0.046) and lower 3-month mortality (OR 0.52, 0.33-0.81, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between thrombolytics for PH (OR 0.84, 0.55-1.30, p = 0.44) and sICH incidence (OR 0.70, 0.42-1.18, p = 0.18). Our data are encouraging regarding the efficacy and reassuring regarding the safety of tenecteplase compared with that of alteplase in bridging therapy for patients with LVO strokes and a large ischemic core in routine clinical care. These results support its consideration as an alternative to alteplase in bridging therapy for patients with large ischemic cores. NCT03776877 (ETIS registry) and NCT05534360 (TETRIS registry). This study provides Class III evidence that patients with anterior circulation LVO stroke and DWI-ASPECTS ≤5 treated with tenecteplase vs alteplase before MT experienced better functional outcomes and lower mortality at 3 months.

A single-day polychemotherapy regimen with proteasome inhibitor combinations for relapsed/refractory myeloma in the era of novel therapies.

PCAB (prednisone, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, carmustine) is a single-day regimen previously used for induction and now in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We retrospectively analysed the outcomes of 85 patients from five Australian centres. These included 30 patients (35.3%) who received PCAB with one additional agent (bortezomib most frequently). Median age of the patients was 65 years (37-80), with a median of four (1-8) prior lines of therapy. ORR was 37% (CR 4.9%). Median progression free survival and overall survival were 4.4 months (95% CI 3.5-6.7) and 7.4 months (95% CI 6.4-10.2), respectively. Extramedullary disease (EMD) was associated with shorter survival. Grade 3 or 4 cytopenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 76.2% and 39.1%, respectively, with six (7.1%) treatment-related mortalities. Median inpatient stay was 3.3 days/28-day cycle (IQR 0.6-13), and for patients who died, a median of 20.2% of days alive were spent inpatient (IQR 6.4-39.1%). Three patients were successfully bridged to CAR T-cell therapy using PCAB, despite being penta-exposed and having EMD. PCAB may be considered as a useful salvage therapy amongst other polychemotherapy regimens in late relapse. Further studies is warranted to investigate and define its role as a bridging therapy to novel therapeutics.

A Multicenter Real-life Prospective Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel Toxicity and Outcomes in Large B-cell Lymphomas.

This real-world prospective observational study across 21 Italian centers (CART-SIE) compares axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) outcomes in 485 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma with baseline characteristics matched by stabilized inverse propensity score weighting. Axi-cel versus tisa-cel had higher all-grade cytokine release syndrome (78.6% vs. 89.3%, P = 0.0017) and neurotoxicity (9.9% vs. 32.2%, P < 0.0001) but also superior progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year (46.5% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.0009). Even among patients who failed bridging therapy, axi-cel PFS was superior to tisa-cel (37.5% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.0059). Differences in overall survival and high-grade immune toxicities were not significant. The CAR-HEMATOTOX score not only predicted hematologic toxicity but also 1-year survival outcomes (51.5% in CAR-HEMATOTOX high vs. 77.2% in CAR-HEMATOTOX low, P < 0.0001). Twenty patients developed second primary malignancies, including two cases of T-cell neoplasms. These findings enable more informed selection of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, balancing bridging, safety, and efficacy considerations for individual patients. Significance: The findings of this study on 485 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with commercial axi-cel and tisa-cel indicate axi-cel's superior PFS after propensity score weighting. The predictive utility of CAR-HEMATOTOX in assessing not only toxicity but also outcomes across both CAR T-cell products may guide future risk-stratified management strategies.

Long-term posttransplant survival outcome following bridging locoregional therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liver transplantation (LT) is essential due to its curative efficacy, but liver-graft shortages have limited its widespread application. Bridging locoregional therapy (LRT) before LT has been performed to prevent tumor progression, and a recent literature review revealed that it is associated with a nonsignificant trend toward better survival outcomes. However, much more information on bridging therapy has become available since then. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the posttransplant survival and HCC recurrence between patients with and without pretransplant bridging LRT. Studies were identified in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library. Two independent researchers screened titles and full articles, extracted relevant data, and conducted a parametric survival analysis. Out of 4794 studies, 18 cohort studies were eligible. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 93.1%, 85.0%, and 79.1% for those in the bridging LRT group, while they were 91.8%, 81.1%, and 75.5% for those who did not receive LRT, respectively. There were no differences in overall survival between these groups (HR 0.90; 0.78-1.05, P = 0.17). Interestingly, we discovered that bridging therapy helped prolong survival significantly in a high-risk population with a long waiting time (HR 0.76; 0.60-0.96, P = 0.02). Unfortunately, bridging LRT did not improve disease-free survival (HR 0.98; 0.86-1.11, P = 0.70). The results indicate that bridging LRT does not generally change post-LT outcomes. However, bridging LRT can significantly improve survival in patients with a long waiting time for LT.

Indication and efficacy of injection laryngoplasty for laryngeal clefts - A retrospective cohort study

PurposeLaryngeal cleft (LC) is an anatomical defect of the larynx, where there is a gap (or cleft) between the arytenoids. Milder types can be treated with injection laryngoplasty (IL), involving injection with a filler, resulting in a decreased depth of the cleft and thereby reducing tracheal penetration or aspiration. The effect, however, is temporary. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible indications and the efficacy of IL for LC. MethodsPatients who underwent IL for LC between March 2018 and June 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. The following parameters were studied: incidence of LC symptoms and objective swallowing evaluations before and after IL, the duration of possible symptom improvement, complications, and the number of subsequent suture repairs. ResultsEighty-five patients were included. Before IL, 81 (96 %) patients had symptoms of aspiration during feeding, compared to 41 (54 %) patients after IL (p ≤ 0.001). In 42 (49 %) patients, temporary symptom relief occurred, in 22 (26 %) patients symptoms persisted, in 16 (19 %) patients symptoms decreased permanently. Mild complications such as cough and desaturations in the direct postoperative period occurred. ConclusionThis study shows a statistically significant decrease in the number of parents/caretakers reporting swallowing symptoms after injection laryngoplasty, and a decrease in the average percentage of parents/caretakers reporting various other symptoms. Based on our results, injection laryngoplasty can be recommended as a diagnostic tool in the treatment of laryngeal cleft. Furthermore, it can be used as bridge therapy (i.e. until patients outgrow their symptoms, or until suture repair).

Tenecteplase Is a Better Alternative to Alteplase for Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Receiving Bridging Therapy.

Tenecteplase Is a Better Alternative to Alteplase for Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Receiving Bridging Therapy.

CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-T cells as bridging therapy to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation improves outcome in patients with refractory/relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has been confirmed improving remission rates in refractory patients or relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However, the added benefits of undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) following CAR-T therapy remain a subject of debate. In this research we investigated the efficiency and long-term outcomes of CD19 CAR-T bridging with allo-HSCT in R/R B-ALL patients. A total of 42 patients were brought into the cohort studies. Our findings revealed that patients who appected CAR-T followed by HSCT had a 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of 70 % and a 1-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate of 95 %. Moreover, patients who underwent this combined treatment had higher OS and LFS rates compared to those who received CAR-T therapy alone. In conclusion, the results of this clinical trial provide compelling evidence for the safety and efficacy of using CAR-T therapy as a bridging strategy to allo-HSCT in patients with R/R B-ALL.

Riociguat as bridging therapy to pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a retrospective cohort study.

In operable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients, the utilization of bridging therapy with targeted medications prior to pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) remains a topic of controversy, despite being common in cases of severe hemodynamic impairment. This study aims to assess the impact of riociguat as a bridging therapy on postoperative hemodynamics and outcomes. We conducted a retrospective study involving patients undergoing PEA from December 2016 to November 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the use of riociguat before PEA. Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) following riociguat administration was assessed pre-PEA. Postoperative outcomes, including mortality, complications, and hemodynamics, were compared, employing propensity score matching analysis. Among the patients, 41.8% (n=56) received riociguat as bridging therapy. In patients with PVR ≥800 dynes·sec·cm-5, riociguat resulted in a reduction in PVR {1,207 [974-1,698] vs. 1,125 [928-1,486] dynes·sec·cm-5, P<0.01}, while no significant difference was observed in patients with PVR <800 dynes·sec·cm-5 {641 [474-740] vs. 600 [480-768] dynes·sec·cm-5, P=0.46}. After propensity score matching, each group included 26 patients. The overall perioperative mortality rate was 2.6%. Postoperative PVR {326 [254-398] vs. 361 [290-445] dynes·sec·cm-5, P=0.35} was similar in the riociguat group compared to the control group. The incidence of residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) and other postoperative outcomes were also comparable. The use of riociguat as bridging therapy demonstrated hemodynamic improvement before PEA in patients with high preoperative PVR. However, no additional benefits in postoperative mortality or hemodynamics were observed.

Risk factors for MACE and bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing surgery: Insights from the bridge trial

IntroductionPatients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing elective procedures are at risk for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) and symptomatic bleeding. We aimed to identify risk factors to guide perioperative risk stratification. MethodsWe conducted a post-hoc analysis of the “Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients who Require Temporary Interruption of Warfarin Therapy for an Elective Invasive Procedure or Surgery” randomized trial. The primary outcomes were MACE and symptomatic bleeding. Our statistical approach encompassed standard univariate analysis, logistic stepwise regression, and Cox regression models. Additional interaction analyses evaluated the interplay between low-molecular-weight heparin bridge therapy and other identified risk factors. ResultsAmong a total of 1,813 participants (mean age 71.6 ± 8.8, 73.3 % male), MACE occurred in 25 (1.4 %) individuals, with pre-procedure clopidogrel use (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 7.73, 95 % CI 2.63-22.72, p < 0.001) and CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 5 (aHR 2.89, 95 % CI 1.26-6.63, p = 0.012) identified as risk factors. Symptomatic bleeding occurred in 57 (3.1 %) individuals, with bridge therapy (aHR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.07-3.19, p = 0.029), renal disease (aHR 2.50, 95 % CI 1.34-4.67, p = 0.004), post-procedure aspirin use (aHR 2.86, 95 % CI 1.66-4.91, p < 0.001), post-procedure nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use excluding aspirin (aHR 3.40, 95 % CI 1.22-9.43, p = 0.019), and major surgery (aHR 3.94, 95 % CI 2.26-6.85, p < 0.001) identified as risk factors. The interactions between risk factors and bridging therapy on MACE and symptomatic bleeding outcomes were not significant (p > 0.05). ConclusionWe identified predictors for MACE and symptomatic bleeding in AF patients undergoing elective procedures. These insights may help guide perioperative decisions to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of bendamustine-containing bridging therapy in R/R LBCL patients receiving CD19 CAR T-cells.

Bridging therapy (BT) after leukapheresis is required in most relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Bendamustine-containing regimens are a potential BT option. We aimed to assess if this agent had a negative impact on CAR-T outcomes when it was administered as BT. We included R/R LBCL patients from six centers who received systemic BT after leukapheresis from February 2019 to September 2022; patients who only received steroids or had pre-apheresis bendamustine exposure were excluded. Patients were dividedinto two BT groups, with and without bendamustine. Separate safety and efficacy analyses were carried out for axi-cel and tisa-cel. Of 243 patients who received BT, bendamustine (benda) was included in 62 (26%). There was a higher rate of BT progressors in the non-benda group (62% vs. 45%, p = 0.02). Concerning CAR-T efficacy, complete responses were comparable for benda versus non-benda BT cohorts with axi-cel (70% vs. 53%, p = 0.12) and tisa-cel (44% vs. 36%, p = 0.70). Also, 12-month progression-free and overall survival were not significantly different between BT groups with axi-cel (56% vs. 43% and 71% vs. 63%) and tisa-cel (25% vs. 26% and 52% vs. 48%); there were no differences when BT response was considered. CAR T-cell expansion for each construct was similar between BT groups. Regarding safety, CRS G ≥3 (6% vs. 6%, p = 0.79), ICANS G ≥3 (15% vs. 17%, p = 0.68), severe infections, and neutropenia post-infusion were comparable among BT regimens. BT with bendamustine-containing regimens is safe for patients requiring disease control during CAR T-cell manufacturing.

Surgical repair of an aortoesophageal fistula after salvage thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a case report

BackgroundAn aortoesophageal fistula can prove to be fatal. Salvage thoracic endovascular aortic repair as a bridging therapy and radical surgery with thoracotomy should be considered while treating aortoesophageal fistula without spontaneous closure. Moreover, it is essential to select a technique that reduces the risk of reinfection. Here we report a rare case of a ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm related to esophageal perforation by a fish bone that led to massive hematemesis and shock, and the surgical treatment of an aortoesophageal fistula that developed after salvage thoracic endovascular aortic repair.Case presentationA 70-year-old Japanese female patient was admitted with hematemesis, thoracic pain, and shock related to esophageal perforation of a ruptured descending aortic aneurysm caused by fish bone aspiration and esophageal perforation 1 month previously. An emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed. Postoperatively, an aortoesophageal fistula that remained open and a food intake-related increase in the inflammatory response was noted. Radical blood-vessel prosthesis implantation and fistula closure were performed. The patient’s postoperative course was favorable and the patient was discharged 22 days after the blood vessel prosthesis implantation.ConclusionSuch a case of rupture of a descending aortic aneurysm related to perforation by a fish bone and an aortoesophageal fistula is considerably rare. Thus, we report the therapeutic strategy of this particular case and review the relevant literature.

Bridge Therapy before Liver Transplant for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common primary liver tumor. Orthotopic liver transplant is one of the best treatment options, but its waiting list has to be considered. Bridge therapies have been introduced in order to limit this issue. The aim of this study is to evaluate if bridge therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma can improve overall survival and reduce de-listing. We selected 185 articles. The search was limited to English articles involving only adult patients. These were deduplicated and articles with incomplete text or irrelevant conclusions were excluded. Sorafenib is the standard of care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increases overall survival without any significant drug toxicity. However, its survival benefit is limited. The combination of transarterial chemoembolization + sorafenib, instead, delays tumor progression, although its survival benefit is still uncertain. A few studies have shown that patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization + radiation therapy have similar or even better outcomes than those undergoing transarterial chemoembolization or sorafenib alone for rates of histopathologic complete response (89% had no residual in the explant). Also, the combined therapy of transarterial chemoembolization + radiotherapy + sorafenib was compared to the association of transarterial chemoembolization + radiotherapy and was associated with a better survival rate (24 vs. 17 months). Moreover, immunotherapy revealed new encouraging perspectives. Combination therapies showed the most encouraging results and could become the gold standard as a bridge to transplant for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Abstract PO-007: A phase 1 study of romidepsin, azacitidine, dexamethasone, and lenalidomide (RAdR) for relapsed/refractory T-cell malignancies

Abstract Romidepsin, azacitidine and lenalidomide are all active in T-cell malignancies (TCM) demonstrating single agent objective response rates (ORR) of 20 to 30% (Coiffier 2012; Morschhauser 2013; Dupuis 2022). Combinations of these targeted agents improves the rates of complete response (CR) but have significant toxicity due to indefinite schedules. We hypothesized that use of a multi-targeted therapy regimen such as RAdR given in fixed duration cycles would be safe and effective. We tested escalating doses of lenalidomide (5-20mg) with fixed doses of romidepsin, azacitidine and dexamethasone in a phase 1 study. Patients (pts) first received a 7-day window of lenalidomide for cytokine correlative research followed by six cycles of romidepsin (12mg/m2; days 1 and 10), azacitidine (300mg; days 1-10), dexamethasone (40mg; days 1 and 10), and lenalidomide (5-20mg; days 1-10) in 21-day cycles for up to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of lenalidomide and the primary objective was the overall safety of the regimen. A 3+3 design was used with an additional 9 pts treated at the MTD. 26 pts were enrolled with a median age of 61 years (range, 28-80) including 31% over 65. Eight (31%) pts had PTCL, NOS, 6 (23%) had mycosis fungoides (MF), 5 (19%) had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, and 4 (15%) ATLL. Median prior lines of therapy were 2 (range, 1-8), 31% had received &amp;gt;3 prior lines and 2 patients had received prior allogeneic transplantation. The median number of cycles was 4 (range, &amp;lt;1-6). The most frequent reasons for stopping therapy were progressive disease (38%), completion of planned therapy (27%) and adverse events (23%). The most frequent grade 1-2 non-hematologic adverse events were vomiting (52%), diarrhea (48%) and dysgeusia (48%), and AE grade 3+ included infection (16%) and hypokalemia (16%). Grade 3+ neutropenia occurred in 24% of cycles and both grade 3+ anemia and thrombocytopenia in 12% of cycles. Two DLTs were observed, grade 4 thrombocytopenia at dose level 1 and grade 3 abdominal pain at dose level 2. The MTD of lenalidomide was determined to be 20mg. In evaluable pts (N=21) the ORR was 66% and CR rate was 14%. After a median follow-up of 23 months. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4 months and not reached, respectively. 2-year OS was 53%. Two pts (PTCL, NOS and MF) completed the planned 6 cycles of therapy and remain in remission without consolidation at 30 months. Five pts were successfully bridged to SCT, all of whom remain alive and without progression. In pts treated at the MTD, the ORR was 89% and the CR rate was 22%. The multi-targeted therapy regimen RAdR is safe and can achieve CR after fixed duration in patients with relapsed refractory TCM. Toxicity is predominantly gastrointestinal and hematologic. Most patients do not achieve durable CR with RAdR alone, but it may be effective bridging therapy to consolidation. This study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH and was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov [NCT04447027]. Citation Format: Max Gordon, Milos Miljkovic, Samuel Ng, Rahul Lakhotia, Christopher Melani, Kevin Conlon, James Phelan, Bonita Bryant, Stefania Pittaluga, Elaine Jaffe, Louis Staudt, Wyndham Wilson, Mark Roschewski. A phase 1 study of romidepsin, azacitidine, dexamethasone, and lenalidomide (RAdR) for relapsed/refractory T-cell malignancies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth AACR International Meeting on Advances in Malignant Lymphoma: Maximizing the Basic-Translational Interface for Clinical Application; 2024 Jun 19-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Blood Cancer Discov 2024;5(3_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-007.

Transarterial embolization is an acceptable bridging therapy to hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignant neoplasm that requires liver transplantation (LT). Despite patients with HCC being prioritized by most organ allocation systems worldwide, they still have to wait for long periods. Locoregional therapies (LRTs) are employed as bridging therapies in patients with HCC awaiting LT. Although largely used in the past, transarterial embolization (TAE) has been replaced by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, the superiority of TACE over TAE has not been consistently shown in the literature. To compare the outcomes of TACE and TAE in patients with HCC awaiting LT. All consecutive patients with HCC awaiting LT between 2011 and 2020 at a single center were included. All patients underwent LRT with either TACE or TAE. Some patients also underwent percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), concomitantly or in different treatment sessions. The choice of LRT for each HCC nodule was determined by a multidisciplinary consensus. The primary outcome was waitlist dropout due to tumor progression, and the secondary outcome was the occurrence of adverse events. In the subset of patients who underwent LT, complete pathological response and post-transplant recurrence-free survival were also assessed. Twelve (18.5%) patients in the TACE group (only TACE and TACE + PEI; n = 65) and 3 (7.9%) patients in the TAE group (only TAE and TAE + PEI; n = 38) dropped out of the waitlist due to tumor progression (P log-rank test = 0.29). Adverse events occurred in 8 (12.3%) and 2 (5.3%) patients in the TACE and TAE groups, respectively (P = 0.316). Forty-eight (73.8%) of the 65 patients in the TACE group and 29 (76.3%) of the 38 patients in the TAE group underwent LT (P = 0.818). Among these patients, complete pathological response was detected in 7 (14.6%) and 9 (31%) patients in the TACE and TAE groups, respectively (P = 0.145). Post-LT, HCC recurred in 9 (18.8%) and 4 (13.8%) patients in the TACE and TAE groups, respectively (P = 0.756). Posttransplant recurrence-free survival was similar between the groups (P log-rank test = 0.71). Dropout rates and posttransplant recurrence-free survival of TAE were similar to those of TACE in patients with HCC. Our study reinforces the hypothesis that TACE is not superior to TAE as a bridging therapy to LT in patients with HCC.

Intravenous methylprednisolone in patients with episodic cluster headache non-responders to oral steroids: results from an observational, interventional, single-center study

Background: Verapamil is the drug of choice in the prophylaxis of episodic cluster headache (ECH), and oral corticosteroids are frequently prescribed as concurrent bridging therapy. Approximately 25% of the patients do not respond to oral treatment. The aim of this study was to assess safety and efficacy of high dose intravenous methylprednisolone (MPD) in ECH patients who had not responded to combined oral therapy with prednisone and verapamil. Methods: Forty-four ECH patients – non responders to oral therapy – were treated with intravenous MPD (500 mg/day for 5 days) and verapamil during cluster headache active periods. No serious adverse event was reported. Results: After 5 days of intravenous therapy, the 24-hour frequency of cluster headache attacks significantly decreased. Sixty-eight percent of patients became headache-free, and 25% experienced a reduction of more than 50% in daily attacks. No clinical benefit was reported in the remaining three patients. Conclusions: Our study shows that intravenous MPD is a safe, effective, and reproducible treatment for ECH patients not responding to oral therapy.