Bridge Principle Research Articles

Pencil drawn meter bridge

Abstract This study investigates the application of a Wheatstone bridge, specifically through the utilization of a meter bridge constructed on chart paper using pencil graphite. Employing the Wheatstone bridge principle, this study aims to achieve precise measurements of an unknown resistance. Results indicate an error margin between measured and calculated values of less than 10%, highlighting the efficiency and accuracy of this approach. The demonstrated effectiveness of the meter bridge serves as an educational resource, particularly beneficial for K-12 students, providing practical understanding and hands-on experience with the meter bridge concept. This research contributes to enhancing STEAM education by offering a tangible and accessible tool for teaching electrical circuit principles.

Can a dialetheist stay regular?

For a dialetheist, it is rational to believe that true contradictions exist. However, we argue that a dialetheist faces a complex dilemma given some bridge principles for rational beliefs that connect possibility and probability, including the so-called ‘Regularity Principle’. Either her belief is not doxastically possible even for her, or she must assign positive credence to the proposition that dialetheia exists. The former makes her belief prima facie self-defeating. The latter seems to compel her to choose between several more fine-grained options, each of which seems undesirable for a regular and rational probability theory. It is unclear how a dialetheist would stay rationally regular, so we pose this challenge, seeking a response from a dialetheist.

Honoring Family: Using parent partner expertise to strengthen a child welfare coaching program

Increasingly, the child welfare system is acknowledging the importance of incorporating parent voice and expertise into changes in child welfare practice, policy, and research; however, there is limited knowledge on how to incorporate parents’ expertise into program-level change. This study sought input from parent partners on the shared principles of a statewide coaching program for child welfare supervisors. Two focus groups were conducted, an initial focus group (n = 17) and a member checking focus group (n = 14). Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings included three key themes: (a) understand parent context, (b) activate engagement, and (c) bridge principles and practice. Strategies for incorporating parent partner input into the coaching program are discussed.

Enhancing Trustworthiness and Interoperability of Electronic Voting Systems through Blockchain Bridges

Decentralized applications leveraging blockchain technology are gaining widespread adoption within the decentralized applications ecosystem. Interoperability, a fundamental concept facilitating seamless data and processing power exchange across diverse blockchain networks, is paramount in this context. The primary objective of this paper is to explore the transformative potential of "blockchain bridges" in facilitating secure and transparent electronic voting processes across multiple blockchain networks. The study employs a comprehensive analysis of various approaches, including atomic exchanges, sidechains, cross-chain bridges, token wrappers, and interledger protocols. The selection of a specific method is guided by the unique requirements and privacy considerations of the electronic voting use case. The application of two distinct blockchains serves as a practical demonstration, illustrating the principles of blockchain bridges in real-world scenarios. The research reveals that blockchain bridges not only streamline the exchange of data between diverse blockchain networks but also establish a dual decentralization paradigm. This paradigm enables the creation of openly maintained, purpose-specific, decentralized ledgers for electronic voting. The integration of blockchain bridges significantly reduces the risk of fraud, instilling greater confidence in the accuracy of election results. Thus, by presenting a comprehensive array of approaches and emphasizing their practical application, this research contributes to advancing the understanding and implementation of blockchain technology in the critical domain of electronic voting. Doi: 10.28991/HIJ-2023-04-04-04 Full Text: PDF

The normative role of logic for reasoning

This paper advocates for the normative role of logic in reasoning. I offer a response, anchored in an externalist perspective, to two fronts of attack against the normativity thesis, namely Harman’s sceptical challenge and the accusation of naturalistic fallacy. On the one hand, I rework dialogical bridge principles and show that such principles satisfy adequacy criteria to deal with Harman’s challenge. On the other hand, I argue that it is possible to derive normative consequences from logical facts. This is because argumentative interactions among agents involve the acceptance of constitutive rules that entail obligations. Hence, since logical rules can be seen as constitutive of the social practice of reasoning, they create prescriptions for reasoning. Bridge principles make those obligations and prohibitions explicit.

A Scarless Method for Correcting Tanzer Group IIB-Constricted Ear Without Cartilage Grafting.

Tanzer group IIB-constricted ear is described as a deformity of the helix, antihelix, or scapha. Deficiency of the auricular skin and cartilage is a key point in the reconstruction of the cartilaginous framework. Traditionally, the treatment of a constricted ear mainly includes 2 aspects: correction of cartilage deformity and restoration of skin volume deficiency. By mimicking the suspension principle of a cable bridge, our technique only requires adjustment of the spatial directions and mechanical forces between the 2 flaps to achieve an aesthetic effect. The authors were able to avoid harvesting the costal cartilage. The desired ear shape was obtained immediately postoperatively. Therefore, Vaseline gauze was not applied and was modeled along the scapha and antihelix. Expansion of the ear was remarkable in both horizontal and vertical lengths. Our technique causes less damage, less scarring, shorter operation time, fewer complications, faster rehabilitation, and no delays.

The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory: A Methodological Approach

How should political power and influence be allocated in democratic systems? That is, roughly, the core of the boundary problem in democratic theory. As of late, some authors have begun paying increased attention to the methodological aspects of this dispute. This paper attempts to make a twofold contribution to this ‘methodological turn’. On the one hand, it identifies and analyzes five desiderata of a successful principle of democratic inclusion. Any such principle, I argue, must be grounded in a clearly identifiable set of values, must provide a clear standard of inclusion, must specify the relevant modalities of inclusion, must provide sound bridging principles, and must be extensionally adequate. In the first half of the paper, these desiderata are developed and critically scrutinized. On the other hand, I also extract three lessons from the previous discussion. First, that a unique answer to the boundary problem (i.e. one grounded in one single principle) is unlikely. Second, that a satisfactory answer to the boundary problem need not necessarily appeal, as some have argued, to distinctively democratic values. And third, that intuitions about political exclusion (i.e. those requiring or permitting the exclusion of some individuals) should be treated with special caution.

The Transformer Bridge Principle Circuit Using RF Admittance Technology

To investigate the problem of the lag stability of the capacitance value during the level drop of the dirty U-shaped liquid level sensor, the equivalent circuit of the dirty U-shaped liquid level sensor was analyzed, and the transformer bridge’s principle circuit that uses RF admittance technology was designed accordingly. Using the method of controlling a single variable, the measurement accuracy of the circuit was simulated when the dividing capacitance and the regulating capacitance had different values. Then, the right parameter values for the dividing capacitance and the regulating capacitance were found. On this basis, the change of the sensor output capacitance and the change of the length of the attached seawater mixture were controlled separately under the condition of removing the seawater mixture. The simulation outcomes showed that the measurement accuracy was excellent under various situations, validating the transformer principle bridge circuit’s efficacy in minimizing the influence of the output capacitance value’s lag stability.

What the tortoise should do: A knowledge‐first virtue approach to the basing relation

AbstractWhat is it to base a belief on reasons? Existing attempts to give an account of the basing relation encounter a dilemma: either one appeals to some kind of neutral process that does not adequately reflect the way basing is a content‐sensitive first‐personal activity, or one appeals to linking or bridge principles that over‐intellectualize and threaten regress. We explain why this dilemma arises, and diagnose the commitments that are key obstacles to providing a satisfactory account. We explain why they should be rejected anyway, and then offer a new, knowledge‐first virtue epistemological theory of the basing relation that shows how we can substantially theorize about mental processes without these commitments. The resulting view plausibly captures the way in which basing is an inherently mental and content‐sensitive process.

Fetal reduction, moral permissibility and the all or nothing problem

There is an ongoing debate about whether multifetal pregnancy reduction from twins to singletons (2-to-1 MFPR) is morally permissible. By applying the all or nothing problem to the cases of...

Correction to ‘A new bridge principle for the normativity of logic’

Correction to ‘A new bridge principle for the normativity of logic’

How to derive ethically appropriate recommendations for action? A methodology for applied ethics

Researchers in applied ethics, and some areas of bioethics particularly, aim to develop concrete and appropriate recommendations for action in morally relevant real-world situations. When proceeding from more abstract levels of ethical reasoning to such concrete recommendations, however, even with regard to the very same normative principle or norm, it seems possible to develop divergent or even contradictory recommendations for action regarding a certain situation. This may give the impression that such recommendations would be arbitrary and, hence, not well justified. Against this background, we, first, aim at showing that ethical recommendations for action, although being contingent in some sense, are not arbitrary if developed appropriately. For this purpose, we examine two types of contingencies arising in applied ethics reasoning based on recent examples of recommendations for action in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. In doing so, we refer to a three-step model of ethical reasoning towards recommendations for actions. This, however, leaves open the question of how applied ethics may cope with contingent recommendations for action. Therefore, in a second step, we analyze the role of bridge principles for developing ethically appropriate recommendations for action, i.e., principles which connect normative claims with relevant empirical information to justify certain recommendations for action in a given morally relevant situation. Finally, we discuss some implications for reasoning and reporting in empirically informed ethics.

Automatization of Weight and Height Measurement Using Ultrasonic Sensors HC-SR04 and Load Cell Based on Arduino UNO at Integrated Services Posts (Posyandu)

An automatic instrument for measuring weight and height has been realized using the HC-SR04 Ultrasonic Sensor and Arduino Uno-based load cell. This study aims to facilitate the weight and height measurement system to make data collection more efficient and accessible. The instrument is assembled by a frame made of PVC pipe to form a 112 cm high pole. The instrument's top is mounted with an Ultrasonic Sensor to detect height. At the bottom of the instrument, there are four load cells which are assembled with the principle of Wheatstone bridge and then connected to the HX711 module as a signal amplifier to the Arduino to detect weight. The measurement results are displayed on the LCD and the application interface created with Microsoft Visual Studio. The results showed that the instrument could measure and display the results of measuring weight and height well. The error value and accuracy of the Ultrasonic Sensor are 1.09% and 98.913%, respectively. The error values and load cell accuracy were obtained at 1.4% and 98.6%.

A simple solution to the collapse argument for logical pluralism

ABSTRACT Many philosophers have argued that logical pluralism is not compatible with the normativity of logic. They developed different versions of the collapse argument: if two logics are correct, then the weaker one will be normatively irrelevant. In this paper, I argue that the collapse argument is based on a controversial premise: the assumption that every logic can be characterized by the same bridge principle. I provide a solution to the collapse argument based on the modification of this premise, maintaining both logical pluralism and the normativity of logic.

A new bridge principle for the normativity of logic

AbstractLogic appears to be normative for rational belief. The thesis of the normativity of logic holds that indeed logic has such a normative status. Gilbert Harman has questioned it, thereby giving rise to what has been called “Harman's skeptical challenge”. MacFarlane has clarified that in order to answer this challenge and support the normativity of logic, one needs a “bridge principle” that appropriately connects logical entailments and norms for belief, as well as relevant desiderata for the evaluation of candidate bridge principles. Steinberger has identified a list of desiderata, on the basis of which he has proposed his own bridge principle and shown the inadequacy of previous proposals. This paper argues that Steinberger's list is in need of revision and his principle is unsatisfactory, and then puts forward a revised list of desiderata and a new bridge principle in support of the normativity of logic.

Bridge Principles and Epistemic Norms

Is logic normative for belief? A standard approach to answering this question has been to investigate bridge principles relating claims of logical consequence to norms for belief. Although the question is naturally an epistemic one, bridge principles have typically been investigated in isolation from epistemic debates over the correct norms for belief. In this paper we tackle the question of whether logic is normative for belief by proposing a Kripkean model theory accounting for the interaction between logical, doxastic, epistemic and deontic notions and using this model theory to show which bridge principles are implied by epistemic norms that we have independent reason to accept, for example, the knowledge norm and the truth norm. We propose a preliminary theory of the interaction between logical, doxastic, epistemic and deontic notions that has among its commitments bridge principles expressing how logic is normative for belief. We also show how our framework suggests that logic is exceptionally normative.

The Bridged Digital Artery Perforator Flap as an Alternative Reconstructive Option for Dorsal Digital or Toe Soft Tissue Defects.

Dorsal digital soft tissue defects are considered among the most challenging to reconstruct. Numerous treatment options are proposed, including advancement flaps, antegrade, retrograde flow flaps, adipofascial flaps, and digital artery perforator flaps. However, the optimal treatment remains controversial. The concept of the "bridge principle," consisting of the indirect transfer of the flap to the defect area through a muscular bridge, has recently introduced by authors for medial canthal reconstruction. The aim of the study was to examine the feasibility of its application in digital reconstruction for dorsal defects and the development of a new flap. The utilization of the dorsal subcutaneous adipofascial digital or toe tissue as a "bridge" led to description and development of bridged digital artery perforator flaps as an alternative treatment of such defects. From November 2017 to September 2019, a series of 14 patients (mean age of 57.1 years) suffered from dorsal digital or toe soft tissue defects of different dimensions and sustained reconstruction with this new technique. Twelve digits and 2 toes have been concerned. The mean size of the defects was 1.3 × 1.1 cm. All flaps survived without a sign of venous congestion. No functional digital or toe problems were observed during the follow-up period (mean of 11.6 months). Minor wound dehiscence presented in 2 cases (2 of 14 [14.3%]) and a transient skin swelling around the flap in 1. A new concept was introduced to resolve a challenging problem. Initial outcomes are very encouraging. These flaps could be a valuable and reliable reconstructive option.

Empirical Research and Recommendations for Moral Action: A Plea for the Transparent Reporting of Bridge Principles in Public Health Research

Abstract Academic publications of empirical public health research often entail recommendations for moral action that address practitioners and policy makers. These recommendations are regularly based on implicit moral judgments with the underlying reasons not explicitly stated. In this paper, we elaborate on the moral relevance of such judgments and the need to explain them in order to account for academic argumentation. We argue for an explicit reporting of bridge principles to increase the transparency of the reporting of public health research. The reporting of bridge principles can inform readers, support them in understanding the relationship between empirical and normative claims in a specific paper, and may pave new ways for the rigorous reporting of empirical research that has moral implications. Furthermore, it can be used to classify studies to systematically address the justification for their argumentation.

Optimum Design and Test of a Novel Bionic Electronic Stethoscope based on the Cruciform Microcantilever with Leaf Microelectromechanical Systems Structure

AbstractThis paper proposes a heart sound sensing structure and system by combining the traditional auscultation structure and human‐like ear eardrum gas–solid coupling sound conduction process. This system is based on the lever pickup mechanism of eardrum vibration and the traditional stethoscope pickup amplification, microelectromechanical system (MEMS) technology, and the detection principle of piezoresistive and Wheatstone bridge. The optimal size and process parameters of the biomimetic sensor structure are given through theoretical calculation and numerical simulation on Comsol and SRIM. Computer numerical control, 3D printing, MEMS technology, and 3D heterogeneous integration technology are used to complete the precise processing and encapsulation of the proposed structure. After the performance tests, results show that the optimal structure can collect directional signals, with a bandwidth from 10 Hz to 1 kHz, which can effectively cover the range of the heart frequency. The signal‐to‐noise ratio is improved by 2.3 dB compared with the 3M stethoscope. An electrocardiogram and phonocardiogram synchronization detection system is developed with this structure. The structure and system can be effectively applied to the high‐quality collection and intelligent recognition of heart sound data sets. The recognition accuracy can reach 98.5%. It is highly effective for early screening and intelligent diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases.

The Aleph and Other Alleged Mereological Curiosities

Standard principles of mereology, such as the transitivity and asymmetry of proper parthood, have been questioned, using various multi-location scenarios. The most famous of these is Borges’s Aleph, although the literature is rife with other examples that allegedly show that some mereological principle is at odds with some form of multi-location. However, the scenarios only support this conclusion given various bridge principles that link location to parthood. I argue that the bridge principles that guarantee the desired conclusion are controversial partly because they give the wrong result in other situations, in particular cases of co-location. Moreover, less controversial bridge principles do not provide an incompatibility result between standard mereological principles and multi-location. Hence, multi-location does not threaten any standard mereological principles.