Breath-hold Level Research Articles

Automated review of patient position in DIBH breast hybrid IMRT with EPID images.

Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) is a respiratory-gating technique adopted in radiation therapy to lower cardiac irradiation. When performing DIBH treatments, it is important to have a monitoring system to ensure the patient's breath hold level is stable and reproducible at each fraction. In this retrospective study, we developed a system capable of monitoring DIBH breast treatments by utilizing cine EPID images taken during treatment. Setup error and intrafraction motion were measured for all fractions of 20 left-sided breast patients. All patients were treated with a hybrid static-IMRT technique, with EPID images from the static fields analyzed. Ten patients had open static fields and the other ten patients had static fields partially blocked with the multileaf collimator (MLC). Three image-processing algorithms were evaluated on their ability to accurately measure the chest wall position (CWP) in EPID images. CWP measurements were recorded along a 61-pixel region of interest centered along the midline of the image. The median and standard deviation of the CWP were recorded for each image. The algorithm showing the highest agreement with manual measurements was then used to calculate intrafraction motion and setup error. To measure intrafraction motion, the median CWP of the first EPID frame was compared with that of the subsequent EPID images of the treatment. The maximum difference was recorded as the intrafraction motion. The setup error was calculated as the difference in median CWP between the MV DRR and the first EPID image of the lateral tangential field. The results showed that the most accurate image-processing algorithm can identify the chest wall within 1.2mm on both EPID and MV DRR images, and measures intrafraction motion and setup errors within 1.4mm.

Evaluation of the voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold reproducibility in left-sided breast radiotherapy.

Voluntary deep inspiration breath hold (v-DIBH) reduces cardiac dose during left-sided breast irradiation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reproducibility and variability of breath-hold level (BHL) using breath-hold curves and lateral kV setup images together. A retrospective analysis of 30 left breast cancer patients treated using the v-DIBH technique in our department is performed. The BHL difference is measured from breath hold curves and lateral (LAT) kilo-Voltage (kV) setup images. The planning CT image and the selected treatment fraction data are collected. If the changes in BHL relate to the displacement of various bones in the kV setup, images are assessed. Furthermore, the maximum heart distance inside the treatment field is compared from LAT MV portal images. The median and mean values of the BHL are nearly identical in different fractions (good reproducibility). However, the mean BHL values between planning and all measured fractions are statistically different; 16.3 vs. 20.8 mm for the planning and measured fractions (p < 0.001), which indicates that the variability of BHL is significantly different. While reproducibility testing shows good agreement for inter-fractional breath-hold level, the variability between planning and fractions is relatively poor.

Robustness Evaluation for Proton Therapy with a Spirometry Based Deep Inhalation Breath Hold System

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Deep inhalation breath hold (DIBH) treatment allows for greater sparing of healthy tissue by minimizing target motion due to respiration. However, the breath hold level achieved during simulation and throughout treatment is not perfectly reproducible. DIBH techniques such as spirometry define an allowed variation in the nominal breath hold level to facilitate treatment. This variation represents an uncertainty which must be incorporated into the robust evaluation which is essential in proton therapy treatment planning. The aim of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric impact of this uncertainty for DIBH patients treated with proton therapy using a spirometry system with visual feedback and to determine the ideal clinical workflow to ensure robustness. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> A dedicated workflow involving simulation, treatment planning and quality assurance was developed and implemented in our clinic to assess the potential dosimetric impact of this uncertainty. The workflow involved a multi-scan simulation procedure in which patients were simulated under their nominal breath hold level and two additional breath hold levels at ± 100 mL tidal lung volume with respect to the nominal. This variation was chosen as it represents twice the allowed variation during treatment in order to be conservative. The additional scans were used to assess motion near the target and to determine the best techniques to be used during plan optimization to ensure robustness. In particular a 5 mm motion threshold was used by physics to recommend the use of simultaneous optimization across all three image sets. The final treatment plan was forward calculated on the additional image sets to guarantee robustness. Patient data, including on-treatment imaging and verification CT scans (QA-CT), were analyzed to assess plan robustness for 30 patients treated under this workflow over two years. <h3>Results</h3> Out of 30 DIBH patients treated under this workflow the simultaneous optimization tool was recommended in three cases but ultimately not utilized in planning at MD/dosimetry discretion balancing dose to OARs and robustness. All thirty patients passed the robust evaluation procedure and there were no cases for which QA-CT indicated a need to revise a treatment plan due to a variation in the breath hold level. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Our initial experience indicates that in proton therapy utilizing spirometry based DIBH with visual feedback the uncertainty associated with the variation in breath hold level does not have a significant dosimetric impact on plan robustness. Given these results, the decision was made to reduce the workload and simplify the workflow by eliminating the additional scans and utilizing a single breath hold level during simulation.

Accuracy and potential improvements of surface-guided breast cancer radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath-hold with daily image-guidance

Objective. Radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) reduces the heart dose. Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) can guide the DIBH, but the accuracy is subject to variations in the chest wall position relative to the patient surface. Approach. In this study, ten left-sided breast cancer patients received DIBH radiotherapy with tangential fields in 15–18 fractions. After initial SGRT setup in free breathing an orthogonal MV/kV image pair was acquired during SGRT-guided breath-hold. The couch was corrected to align the chest wall during another breath-hold, and a new SGRT reference surface was acquired for the gating. The chest wall position error during treatment was determined from continuous cine MV images in the imager direction perpendicular to the cranio-caudal direction. A treatment error budget was made with individual contributions from the online registration of the setup MV image, the difference in breath-hold level between setup imaging and SGRT reference surface acquisition, the SGRT level during treatment, and intra-fraction shifts of the chest wall relative to the SGRT reference surface. In addition to the original setup protocol (Scenario A), SGRT was also simulated with better integration of image-guidance by capturing either the new reference surface (Scenario B) or the SGRT positional signal (Scenario C) simultaneously with the setup MV image, and accounting for the image-guided couch correction by shifting the SGRT reference surface digitally. Main results. In general, the external SGRT signal correlated well with the internal chest wall position error (correlation coefficient >0.7 for 75% of field deliveries), but external-to-internal target position offsets above 2 mm occasionally occurred (13% of fractions). The PTV margin required to account for the treatment error was 3.5 mm (Scenario A), 3.4 mm (B), and 3.1 mm (C). Significance. Further integration of SGRT with image-guidance may improve treatment accuracy and workflow although the current study did not show large accuracy improvements of scenario B and C compared to scenario A.

Patient setup accuracy in DIBH radiotherapy of breast cancer with lymph node inclusion using surface tracking and image guidance.

Studying setup accuracy in breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node inclusion in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) after patient setup with surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Breast cancer patients (N = 51) were treated (50 Gy in 25 fractions) with axillary lymph nodes within the planning target volume (PTV). Patient setup was initiated with tattoos and lasers, and further adjusted with SGRT. The DIBH guidance was based on SGRT. Orthogonal and/or tangential imaging was analyzed for residual position errors of bony landmarks, the breath-hold level (BHL), the skin outline, and the heart; and setup margins were calculated for the PTV. The calculated PTV margins were 4.3 to 6.3 and 2.8 to 4.6 mm before and after orthogonal imaging, respectively. The residual errors of the heart were 3.6 ± 2.2 mm and 2.5 ± 2.4 mm before and 3.0 ± 2.5 and 2.9 ± 2.3 mm after orthogonal imaging in the combined anterior-posterior/lateral and the cranio-caudal directions, respectively, in tangential images. The humeral head did not benefit from daily IGRT, but SGRT guided it to the correct location. We presented a slightly complicated but highly accurate workflow for DIBH treatments. The residual position errors after both SGRT and IGRT were excellent compared to previous literature. With well-planned SGRT, IGRT brings only slight improvements to systematic accuracy. However, with the calculated PTV margins and the number of outliers, imaging cannot be omitted despite SGRT, unless the PTV margins are re-evaluated.

Impact of breath-hold level on positional error aligned by stent/Lipiodol in Hepatobiliary radiotherapy with breath-hold respiratory control

BackgroundRespiratory motion management with breath hold for patients with hepatobiliary cancers remain a challenge in the precise positioning for radiotherapy. We compared different image-guided alignment markers for estimating positional errors, and investigated the factors associated with positional errors under breath-hold control.MethodsSpirometric motion management system (SDX) for breath holds was used in 44 patients with hepatobiliary tumor. Among them, 28 patients had a stent or embolized materials (lipiodol) as alignment markers. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and kV-orthogonal images were compared for accuracy between different alignment references. Breath-hold level (BHL) was practiced, and BHL variation (ΔBHL) was defined as the standard deviation in differences between actual BHLs and baseline BHL. Mean BHL, ΔBHL, and body-related factors were analyzed for the association with positional errors.ResultsUsing the reference CBCT, the correlations of positional errors were significantly higher in those with stent/lipiodol than when the vertebral bone was used for alignment in three dimensions. Patients with mean BHL > 1.4 L were significantly taller (167.6 cm vs. 161.6 cm, p = 0.03) and heavier (67.1 kg vs. 57.4 kg, p = 0.02), and had different positional error in the craniocaudal direction (− 0.26 cm [caudally] vs. + 0.09 cm [cranially], p = 0.01) than those with mean BHL < 1.4 L. Positional errors were similar for patients with ΔBHL< 0.03 L and > 0.03 L.ConclusionUnder rigorous breath-hold respiratory control, BHL correlated with body weight and height. With more accurate alignment reference by stent/lipiodol, actual BHL but not breath-hold variation was associated with craniocaudal positional errors.

Stability and reproducibility of 6013 deep inspiration breath-holds in left-sided breast cancer

PurposePatients with left-sided breast cancer frequently receive deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy to reduce the risk of cardiac side effects. The aim of the present study was to analyze intra-breath-hold stability and inter-fraction breath-hold reproducibility in clinical practice.Material and methodsOverall, we analyzed 103 patients receiving left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy using a surface-guided DIBH technique. During each treatment session the vertical motion of the patient was continuously measured by a surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) system and automated gating control (beam on/off) was performed using an audio-visual patient feedback system. Dose delivery was automatically triggered when the tracking point was within a predefined gating window. Intra-breath-hold stability and inter-fraction reproducibility across all fractions of the entire treatment course were analyzed per patient.ResultsIn the present series, 6013 breath-holds during beam-on time were analyzed. The mean amplitude of the gating window from the baseline breathing curve (maximum expiration during free breathing) was 15.8 mm (95%-confidence interval: [8.5–30.6] mm) and had a width of 3.5 mm (95%-CI: [2–4.3] mm). As a measure of intra-breath-hold stability, the median standard deviation of the breath-hold level during DIBH was 0.3 mm (95%-CI: [0.1–0.9] mm). Similarly, the median absolute intra-breath-hold linear amplitude deviation was 0.4 mm (95%-CI: [0.01–2.1] mm). Reproducibility testing showed good inter-fractional reliability, as the maximum difference in the breathing amplitudes in all patients and all fractions were 1.3 mm on average (95%-CI: [0.5–2.6] mm).ConclusionThe clinical integration of an optical surface scanner enables a stable and reliable DIBH treatment delivery during SGRT for left-sided breast cancer in clinical routine.

Preliminary evaluation of Time-of-flight (ToF) imaging system for monitoring DIBH radiotherapy

The study focusses on evaluation of a Time-of-flight (ToF) camera for monitoring breath-hold (BH) level during voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy (vDIBH-RT). A commercial Argos 3D P330 ToF camera (Bluetechnix, Austria) was used to provide the distance of the patient imaged based on the light reflected from the illuminated surface. A volunteer was recruited in this study to preliminary evaluate the performance of the ToF camera for optical surface imaging. The vDIBH-RT was simulated by instructing the patient to perform DIBH for 15 seconds during ToF imaging. A small region was selected on the image of the patient’s chest surface, mid-way between the nipples. 200 consecutive ToF images of the selected area were captured during the DIBH. Imaging was repeated during free breathing (FB). These were performed for two times (representing fractions) to evaluate the inter-fraction variability. MATLAB (MathWork, Natick, MA) was used to calculate the average distance and standard deviation (SD) across each set of images acquired during a DIBH representing the BH level and BH stability, respectively. The inter-fraction variability defined as the difference between fraction-1 and fraction-2 was 4.5 mm ± 0.86. The BH stability for both sessions were within 1 mm. The distance measured during free breathing shows traces similar to the respiratory pattern obtained when using spirometry system. In conclusion, the ToF camera has potential in monitoring BH during DIBH-RT for breast cancer.

Impact of Breath-Hold Level but Not Variation on Positional Shift in Hepatobiliary Radiotherapy with Breath-Hold Respiratory Control

Respiratory motion management for patients with hepatobiliary cancers remains a challenge in the positioning precision for radiotherapy. Breath-hold technique provides more accurate treatment, but the procedure demands much coordination of body exercise. This study was aimed to investigate whether the breath-hold stability or body-related factors determined the positional shifts in patients undergoing radiotherapy under a rigorous breath-hold control. Spirometric motion management system (SDXTM) which comprises spirometer with video goggles for the voluntary breath hold was used in a total of 59 patients with hepatobiliary cancers undergoing radiotherapy. Among them, 31 patients were excluded for no intrahepatic markers as the alignment references. The remaining 28 patients with either stent or embolized materials were included in this study. The deep-inspiration breath-hold level (BHL) was practiced to determine baseline BHL at simulation. The rigorous protocol required each breath-hold deviation within 0.1 liter (L) of baseline BHL during radiotherapy. The BHL variation (ΔBHL) was defined as the standard deviation of differences between actual BHLs and baseline BHL. Mean BHL was defined as the average of each patient’s BHLs in treatment. Patients were divided into two groups by mean BHL or ΔBHL to compare the positional shifts. The kV-orthogonal images by on-board imaging system were analyzed for the positional shifts with biliary stent or embolizing lipiodol close to the tumor in anterior-posterior (AP), cranial-caudal (CC), and right-left (RL) directions. Body weight and height of patients were measured on the simulation day. Patients using SDX system maintained a median breath-hold duration of 30 seconds (range: 25-40) and a median BHL of 1.39 L (range: 0.76-2.08). Under the rigorous protocol for breath-hold precision, the positional shifts between the two groups by ΔBHL (<0.03 or >0.03) showed no significant difference in all directions (AP: -0.026 cm vs -0.07 cm, p=0.66; CC: -0.067 cm vs -0.102 cm, p=0.81; RL: 0.048 cm vs 0.033 cm, p＝0.88). In contrast, the comparison between patients with small (<1.4 L) and large mean BHL (>1.4 L) revealed the significant differences in height (161.6 cm vs 167.6 cm, p=0.03), weight (57.4 kg vs 67.1 kg, p=0.02), and the positional shift in CC direction (+0.09 cm [cranially] vs -0.26 cm [caudally], p=0.01). Actual BHL but not breath-hold precision (variation) was associated with the positional errors under rigorous breath-hold protocol. Patients with lower body weight and height had smaller BHL and the cranial positional shift, significantly different from patients with larger BHL and caudal shift. The findings indicate body-specific BHL plays a more crucial role in positional error with SDXTM system.

Respiratory level tracking with visual biofeedback for consistent breath-hold level with potential application in image-guided interventions

BackgroundTo present and evaluate a new respiratory level biofeedback system that aids the patient to return to a consistent breath-hold level with potential application in image-guided interventions.MethodsThe study was approved by the local ethics committee and written informed consent was waived. Respiratory motion was recorded in eight healthy volunteers in the supine and prone positions, using a depth camera that measures the mean distance to thorax, abdomen and back. Volunteers were provided with real-time visual biofeedback on a screen, as a ball moving up and down with respiratory motion. For validation purposes, a conversion factor from mean distance (in mm) to relative lung volume (in mL) was determined using spirometry. Subsequently, without spirometry, volunteers were given breathing instructions and were asked to return to their initial breath-hold level at expiration ten times, in both positions, with and without visual biofeedback. For both positions, the median and interquartile range (IQR) of the absolute error in lung volume from initial breath-hold were determined with and without biofeedback and compared using Wilcoxon signed rank tests.ResultsWithout visual biofeedback, the median difference from initial breath-hold was 124.6 mL (IQR 55.7–259.7 mL) for the supine position and 156.3 mL (IQR 90.9–334.7 mL) for the prone position. With the biofeedback, the difference was significantly decreased to 32.7 mL (IQR 12.8–59.6 mL) (p < 0.001) and 22.3 mL (IQR 7.7–47.0 mL) (p < 0.001), respectively.ConclusionsThe use of a depth camera to provide visual biofeedback increased the reproducibility of breath-hold expiration level in healthy volunteers, with a potential to eliminate targeting errors caused by respiratory movement during lung image-guided procedures.

P136] The correlation of infrared reflecting marker movement and lung expansion with deep inspiration breath-hold technique for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy

Purpose This study was to quantify the correlation of the infrared reflecting marker movement and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) lung expansions by setting the infrared reflecting marker below the xiphoid process on the abdominal wall. Methods Ten patients with left breast cancer post operation underwent free-breathing (FB) and DIBH computed tomography (CT) using infrared reflecting marker on the abdominal wall. Therapists coached patient breathing maneuvers before CT scans. The breath-hold level (BHL) was recorded by infrared reflecting marker in the anteroposterior (AP) direction by Real-time Position Management system (RPM) system during CT procedure. Lung diameter in AP direction on both free-breathing (FB) and DIBH images were measured at 4 levels: half upper, upper border of heart, half lower and diaphragm levels of lung. The first CT slice with visible lung tissue and diaphragm level were identified for lung diameter in superioinferior (SI) direction corresponding Z values (slice position). Pearson correlation test was used to examine the correlation significance among BHL, lung AP diameter, lung SI diameter, heart dose, and left lung dose. Results The BHL had strongly positive correlation with lung expansion in SI direction (Pearson correlation r = 0.770). When BHL increased 1.0 cm, the lung expansion in SI direction increased 2.6 cm. Also, moderately positive correlation was revealed between BHL and total lung volume (Pearson correlation r = 0.596). When BHL increased 1.0 cm, the total lung volume increased 414.1c.c. Heart mean dose and maximum dose were strongly negative correlated to BHL according to inverse square law. Weak or no correlation was noted between BHL and lung expansion in AP direction at 4 levels (Pearson correlation r = 0.318, 0.009, −0.105 and −0.238). DIBH plans had lower heart dose (2.64 vs. 1.32 Gy; P = 0.005) and ipsilateral lung V20 (%) relative volume (13.6 vs. 10.9 %; P = 0.007) than FB plans as previous studies. Conclusions Setting infrared reflecting marker below the xiphoid process on the abdominal wall is sufficient for DIBH technique to detect lung expansion in SI direction and decrease the heart dose significantly. Patient couching before CT scans is recommended.

Deep inspiration breath hold level variability and deformation in locoregional breast irradiation

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric effect of breath hold level variability and deformation on breast, chest wall, internal mammary chain (IMC) nodes, and heart. Methods and materialsLeft-sided post-lumpectomy (n = 12) and postmastectomy (n = 3) patients underwent deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and exhale breath hold (EBH) computed tomography (CT) scans. Forward-planned locoregional breast plans were created on the DIBH scan. Two effects were modeled assuming no setup uncertainties: residual motion within the gating window and systematically shallow breath hold levels (BHLs). Real-time position management (RPM) was used to monitor BHL at simulation and during treatment. The RPM data were scaled to simulate BHL variation within symmetric gating window widths of ±1, 3, 5, and 7 mm; the dosimetric impact of this motion was simulated in the treatment planning system. Systematically “shallow” BHL errors were modeled using deformable image registration to map the patient trajectory from DIBH to EBH (n = 12). The deformable vector fields were scaled to produce synthetic CT scans modeling patient position during breath holds 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm shallower than simulator BHL. The original treatment plans were applied to the synthetic CTs and dose was recalculated. ResultsAcceptable plan quality was maintained for most patients with motion within gating windows up to ±7 mm. Patients with shallow median BHLs experienced loss of coverage at simulated gating windows ±5 mm or larger. At systematic 3 mm shallow BHL error, 4/12 patients had clinical target volume IMC V80% < 99%; this increased to 11/12 patients at 5 mm. Change in heart dose from systematic BHL errors was negligible. ConclusionsMotion within gating windows has minimal dosimetric impact for most BHL variability; however, loss of IMC coverage can occur even for small gating windows when BHLs are systematically shallow. This can be mitigated by restricting lower BHL tolerances or accounting for known uncertainties in planning.

Technical Note: Issues related to external marker block placement for deep inspiration breath hold breast radiotherapy

It has been suggested that the Real-time Position Management (RPM) marker block should be placed directly on the breast or sternum to verify deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) level for breast radiotherapy. We explore three potential issues with this practice: (a) surface dose effect of placing the marker block in the primary beam; (b) effect of marker block tilt on the accuracy of the RPM system; and (c) correlation between marker block positions on the patient surface and internal chest wall position. (a) The surface dose under the two-, four-, and six-dot marker blocks was measured at incident angles of 0° and 30°; (b) the motion amplitude detected when using the two- and six-dot marker blocks was recorded for block tilts from 0° to 60° about the RPM camera line of sight; (c) the correlation between median displacement of the chest wall and median displacement of the surface contour between breath holds was investigated for superior, middle, and inferior block positions using contours extracted from portal images of eight left-sided breast cancer patients. (a) The marker blocks increased the surface dose for a 6 MV direct field by 48.2-52.2% of Dmax ; (b) at lateral tilts greater than 10°, the two-dot marker block overestimated the motion amplitude; however, the six-dot marker block amplitude remained accurate up to 60°; (c) the whole, superior, and middle surface positions were strongly correlated with chest wall displacement (R2 = 0.83; R2 = 0.90; R2 = 0.83), whereas the inferior position was moderately correlated (R2 = 0.36). The RPM marker block can be placed on the breast for DIBH treatments; however, caution should be used regarding surface dose effects. The two-dot marker block should not be used for block tilts beyond 20°. Marker block placement at a middle or superior position on the breast results in the strongest correlation with chest wall position.

Opposite Impact of Breath Hold Level and Variation on Position Shifts in Liver Radiation Therapy With Deep-Inspiration Breath Hold Technique

Opposite Impact of Breath Hold Level and Variation on Position Shifts in Liver Radiation Therapy With Deep-Inspiration Breath Hold Technique

Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath-hold for breast radiotherapy.

A low‐resource visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold (VM‐DIBH) technique was successfully implemented in our clinic to reduce cardiac dose in left‐sided breast radiotherapy. In this study, we retrospectively characterized the chest wall and heart positioning accuracy of VM‐DIBH using cine portal images from 42 patients. Central chest wall position from field edge and in‐field maximum heart distance (MHD) were manually measured on cine images and compared to the planned positions based on the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). An in‐house program was designed to measure left anterior descending artery (LAD) and chest wall separation on the planning DIBH CT scan with respect to breath‐hold level (BHL) during simulation to determine a minimum BHL for VM‐DIBH eligibility. Systematic and random setup uncertainties of 3.0 mm and 2.6 mm, respectively, were found for VM‐DIBH treatment from the chest wall measurements. Intrabeam breath‐hold stability was found to be good, with over 96% of delivered fields within 3 mm. Average treatment MHD was significantly larger for those patients where some of the heart was planned in the field compared to patients whose heart was completely shielded in the plan (p < 0.001). No evidence for a minimum BHL was found, suggesting that all patients who can tolerate DIBH may yield a benefit from it.PACS number(s): 87.53.Jw, 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D‐

Improving the reproducibility of voluntary deep inspiration breath hold technique during adjuvant left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy

Background: Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) of left-sided breast cancer (LSBC) with voluntary deep inspiration breath hold (vDIBH) technique reduces the cardiac dose. In this study, the effect of marker block position and the efficacy of breath hold level (BHL) correction based on lateral kV setup images are evaluated to improve the daily reproducibility. Material and methods: A total of 148 consecutive LSBC patients treated with vDIBH RT were included in this study. The real-time position management (RPM) marker block was placed on the abdominal wall in 63 patients (group A) and on the sternum in 85 patients (group S). Acquired 900 (group A) + 1040 (group S) orthogonal image pairs were retrospectively analyzed. The actual BHL was determined from the lateral kV images. The height of the BHL gating window in RPM was corrected if errors of the actual BHL exceeded 4 mm. Setup margins were calculated for the chest wall and for bony surrogates of the lymph node regions. Results: The sternal marker block reduced the random residual errors in the actual BHL (p < 0.05). The BHL correction was required for 26/63 patients in group A and for 26/85 patients in group S. Correction of the BHL window significantly reduced both the systematic and the random residual error in both groups. In patients with lymph node irradiation, the effect of both marker placement and BHL window correction was significant in the superior-inferior direction. Correction of the BHL reduced the mean cardiac dose by 0.5 Gy (p < 0.01) in group A and 0.6 Gy (p < 0.05) in group S. Conclusions: Reproducibility of the BHL can be improved by placing the marker block on the sternum and correcting the height of the BHL window based on lateral kV setup images. Acquisition of lateral kV images in the first 3 fractions and once a week during RT is recommended.

Cardiac dosimetric evaluation of deep inspiration breath-hold level variances using computed tomography scans generated from deformable image registration displacement vectors

There is a reduction in cardiac dose for left-sided breast radiotherapy during treatment with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) when compared with treatment with free breathing (FB). Various levels of DIBH may occur for different treatment fractions. Dosimetric effects due to this and other motions are a major component of uncertainty in radiotherapy in this setting. Recent developments in deformable registration techniques allow displacement vectors between various temporal and spatial patient representations to be digitally quantified. We propose a method to evaluate the dosimetric effect to the heart from variable reproducibility of DIBH by using deformable registration to create new anatomical computed tomography (CT) scans. From deformable registration, 3-dimensional deformation vectors are generated with FB and DIBH. The obtained deformation vectors are scaled to 75%, 90%, and 110% and are applied to the reference image to create new CT scans at these inspirational levels. The scans are then imported into the treatment planning system and dose calculations are performed. The average mean dose to the heart was 2.5Gy (0.7 to 9.6Gy) at FB, 1.2Gy (0.6 to 3.8Gy, p < 0.001) at 75% inspiration, 1.1Gy (0.6 to 3.1Gy, p = 0.004) at 90% inspiration, 1.0Gy (0.6 to 3.0Gy) at 100% inspiration or DIBH, and 1.0Gy (0.6 to 2.8Gy, p = 0.019) at 110% inspiration. The average mean dose to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was 19.9Gy (2.4 to 46.4Gy), 8.6Gy (2.0 to 43.8Gy, p < 0.001), 7.2Gy (1.9 to 40.1Gy, p = 0.035), 6.5Gy (1.8 to 34.7Gy), and 5.3Gy (1.5 to 31.5Gy, p < 0.001), correspondingly. This novel method enables numerous anatomical situations to be mimicked and quantifies the dosimetric effect they have on a treatment plan.

Determination of the optimal matching position for setup images and minimal setup margins in adjuvant radiotherapy of breast and lymph nodes treated in voluntary deep inhalation breath-hold.

BackgroundAdjuvant radiotherapy (RT) of left-sided breast cancer is increasingly performed in voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold (vDIBH). The aim of this study was to estimate the reproducibility of breath-hold level (BHL) and to find optimal bony landmarks for matching of orthogonal setup images to minimise setup margins.Methods1067 sets of images with an orthogonal setup and tangential field from 67 patients were retrospectively analysed. Residual position errors were determined in the tangential treatment field images for different matches of the setup images. Variation of patient posture and BHL were analysed for position errors of the vertebrae, clavicula, ribs and sternum in the setup and tangential field images. The BHL was controlled with a Varian RPM® system. Setup margins were calculated using the van Herk’s formula. Patients who underwent lymph node irradiation were also investigated.ResultsFor the breast alone, the midway compromise of the ribs and sternum was the best general choice for matching of the setup images. The required margins were 6.5 mm and 5.3 mm in superior-inferior (SI) and lateral/anterior-posterior (LAT/AP) directions, respectively. With the individually optimised image matching position also including the vertebrae, slightly smaller margins of 6.0 mm and 4.8 mm were achieved, respectively. With the individually optimised match, margins of 7.5 mm and 10.8 mm should be used in LAT and SI directions, respectively, for the lymph node regions. These margins were considered too large. The reproducibility of the BHL was within 5 mm in the AP direction for 75% of patients.ConclusionsThe smallest setup margins were obtained when the matching position of the setup images was individually optimised for each patient. Optimal match for the breast alone is not optimal for the lymph node region, and, therefore, a threshold of 5 mm was introduced for residual position errors of the sternum, upper vertebrae, clavicula and chest wall to retain minimal setup margins of 5 mm. Because random interfraction variation in patient posture was large, we recommend daily online image guidance. The BHL should be verified with image guidance.

Improving intra-fractional target position accuracy using a 3D surface surrogate for left breast irradiation using the respiratory-gated deep-inspiration breath-hold technique.

PurposeTo evaluate the use of 3D optical surface imaging as a surrogate for respiratory gated deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) for left breast irradiation.Material and MethodsPatients with left-sided breast cancer treated with lumpectomy or mastectomy were selected as candidates for DIBH treatment for their external beam radiation therapy. Treatment plans were created on both free breathing (FB) and DIBH computed tomography (CT) simulation scans to determine dosimetric benefits from DIBH. The Real-time Position Management (RPM) system was used to acquire patient's breathing trace during DIBH CT acquisition and treatment delivery. The reference 3D surface models from FB and DIBH CT scans were generated and transferred to the “AlignRT” system for patient positioning and real-time treatment monitoring. MV Cine images were acquired during treatment for each beam as quality assurance for intra-fractional position verification. The chest wall excursions measured on these images were used to define the actual target position during treatment, and to investigate the accuracy and reproducibility of RPM and AlignRT.ResultsReduction in heart dose can be achieved using DIBH for left breast/chest wall radiation. RPM was shown to have inferior correlation with the actual target position, as determined by the MV Cine imaging. Therefore, RPM alone may not be an adequate surrogate in defining the breath-hold level. Alternatively, the AlignRT surface imaging demonstrated a superior correlation with the actual target positioning during DIBH. Both the vertical and magnitude real-time deltas (RTDs) reported by AlignRT can be used as the gating parameter, with a recommended threshold of ±3 mm and 5 mm, respectively.ConclusionThe RPM system alone may not be sufficient for the required level of accuracy in left-sided breast/CW DIBH treatments. The 3D surface imaging can be used to ensure patient setup and monitor inter- and intra- fractional motions. Furthermore, the target position accuracy during DIBH treatment can be improved by AlignRT as a superior surrogate, in addition to the RPM system.

Lowering heart rate with an optimised breathing protocol for prospectively ECG-triggered CT coronary angiography

The aim was to prospectively characterise the effect of the level of breath-hold on heart rate in CT coronary angiography (CTCA) with prospective electrocardiogram (ECG) triggering and its impact on coronary artery attenuation. 260 patients (86 women; mean age 59 ± 11 years) underwent 64-slice CTCA using prospective ECG triggering. Prior to CTCA, heart rates were recorded during 15 s of breath-hold at three different levels of inspiration (normal, intermediate and deep). The inspiration level with the lowest heart rate was chosen for actual CTCA scanning. Coronary artery attenuation was measured, and the presence of backflow of contrast material into the inferior vena cava (as an indicator of increased intrathoracic pressure) was recorded. The mean heart rate at breath-hold was significantly different for the three inspiration levels (normal, 60 ± 8 bpm; intermediate, 59 ± 8 bpm; deep, 57 ± 7 bpm; p<0.001). The maximum heart rate reduction in each patient at breath-hold averaged 5.3 ± 5.1 bpm, and was observed at a normal inspiration depth in 23 (9%) patients, at an intermediate inspiration depth in 102 (39%) patients and at deep inspiration in 135 (52%) patients. Overall, there was no association between the level of breath-hold and coronary vessel attenuation (p-value was not significant). However, the backflow of contrast material into the inferior vena cava (n = 26) was found predominantly at deep inspiration levels (p<0.001), and, when it occurred, it was associated with reduced coronary attenuation compared with patients with no backflow (p<0.05). The breath-hold level to best reduce heart rate for CTCA should be individually assessed prior to scanning because a mean heart rate reduction of 5 bpm can be achieved.