Breast Lesions In Women Research Articles

Assessment Of Ultrasound Versus Mammography In Detecting Breast Lesions In Women Aged 40‐60: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Assessment Of Ultrasound Versus Mammography In Detecting Breast Lesions In Women Aged 40‐60: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Cytological and Histopathological Correlation of Patterns of Breast Lesions in Women above 18 Years at a Tertiary Care Government Teaching Hospital in Jaipur

Cytological and Histopathological Correlation of Patterns of Breast Lesions in Women above 18 Years at a Tertiary Care Government Teaching Hospital in Jaipur

Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Distinguishing Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions

Objective: The study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis in diagnosing malignant and benign lesions, keeping histopathology as the gold standard.Study Design: Cross-sectional study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was carried out at the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, POF th th Hospital, Wah Cantt, Pakistan over a period of six months from 11th July 2021 to 11th January 2022.Methods: A total of 200 women presenting with suspicion of breast malignancy were selected consecutively from the outpatient department, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis(DBT) was performed, followed by a biopsy of the specimen to confirm the findings on histopathology. Results: The average age of the sample was 48.3 + 7.1 years, ranging between 35 and 60 years. Palpable breast lump was recorded in 44.5%, pain in 33%, and nipple discharge in 35.5%. Family history of breast Ca was present in 25.5. On Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT), 58.5% of lesions were labeled as malignant, while 53.5% were labeled as malignant on follow-up histopathology. On applying the formulae for calculation, the sensitivity of DBT was found to be 86% and specificity 73.1%. The positive predictive value of the DBT is 78.6%, and the negative predictive value is 81.9%.Conclusion: In conclusion, Digital Breast Tomosynthesisis a significantly sensitive and specific tool for detecting malignant breast lesions in women suspected of breast carcinoma.How to cite this: Afzal K, Gul N, Mehmood K, Jawwad S, Iqbal B. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Distinguishing Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions. Life and Science. 2024; 5(1): 3-8. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.416

Modern Methods of Imaging of Breast Neoplasms (Literature Review)

High incidence of breast cancer is unchanged; therefore, it is relevant to study the possibilities of modern radiological methods for the diagnostics of breast cancer at an early stage. The purpose of the study was to analyze current trends of breast cancer diagnostics at early stages by modern imaging methods according to the literature. The systematic search was performed for reviews and meta-analyses in RSCI, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science databases, published from 2012 to 2022, on breast cancer diagnostics using the keywords: breast cancer, mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography, positron emission computed tomography, computed tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, ultrasound, ultrasound tomosynthesis, magnetic resonance imaging. Out of 100 publications published over the past 10 years, 48 were included in the presented review. The existing methods of diagnosing breast cancer have certain advantages and disadvantages relative to each other, the consideration of which is necessary when drawing up a plan of clarifying diagnostic measures, including women with high breast density. Promising methods of diagnosing breast cancer at an early stage — digital tomosynthesis, ultrasound tomosynthesis, dual-energy spectral contrast mammography, short MRI protocol are new and could be optimize the approach to the diagnosis of breast lesions in women with high breast density. This poorly studied methods require further research to optimize the breast cancer-screening algorithm, improve the indicators of early detection of breast cancer and increase economic efficiency.

Abstract P6-05-11: Active surveillance versus conventional treatment in low-risk DCIS; women’s preferences in the LORD trial

Abstract Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a potential precursor to breast cancer. Its incidence has increased multifold with the introduction of breast cancer screening and makes for 20% of all malignant breast lesions in women. DCIS has the potential to progress into invasive breast cancer. However, the majority of DCIS lesions are indolent and will never progress during the patient’s lifetime. Consequently, there is a growing concern of overdiagnosis and overtreatment for women with DCIS. The LORD trial is a non-randomized, patient preference trial comparing active surveillance to conventional treatment (i.e., breast conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy or mastectomy). The primary outcome of this trial is the percentage of women without an occurrence of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer after 10 years of follow up. Within the patient preference design, women are free to opt for either treatment arm. In addition to active surveillance of the DCIS, quality of life (QOL) of women included in the LORD trial is also actively monitored. The aims of this study were to: a) describe the distribution of participants within the treatment arms, b) identify women’s motives to opt for their preferred treatment arm, and c) assess factors associated with a preference for either treatment arm. Methods: Data from the baseline patient QOL questionnaire was collected. This questionnaire was completed after the women’s diagnosis and first consultation with their physician. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the distribution in both treatment arms. Thematic analyses were used to describe self-reported reasons for treatment selection derived from the open-ended question about treatment preference. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations between the patient characteristics and their preferred treatment arm. Results: In total 384 women completed the baseline questionnaire, of which 376 entered their final treatment decision. Of these women, 287 (76%) opted for active surveillance and 89 (24%) for conventional treatment. Most frequently cited reason for opting for active surveillance was that treatment was not yet necessary (55%). Also, patients’ reasons for preferring active surveillance alluded to a high level of trust in the active surveillance plan (24%) and that disease progression could be picked up and treated in a timely manner (14%). Furthermore, 11% of patients cited the advice of their healthcare professional as a reason for opting for active surveillance and 8% cited reasons relating to altruism. Most reported reasons for opting for the conventional treatment arm were avoiding unnecessary risks (26%), avoiding cancer worry (18%), the notion that what doesn’t belong, should be removed from the body (18%) and a need for closure (13%). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, high level of education (OR 2.17; 95%CI 1.09-4.38) and higher knowledge score (OR 1.8; 95%CI 1.07-3.02) were associated with a preference for conventional treatment. Furthermore, women opting for active surveillance more often reported the decision to be a shared decision between them and their healthcare professional (OR 2.30; 95%CI 1.18-4.47) compared to women who chose conventional treatment, who more often reported decision-making to be patient-driven. Age and tolerance of uncertainty were not significantly associated with treatment preference. Conclusion: The LORD trial is the first to actively offer women with low-risk DCIS a choice between conventional treatment and active surveillance. Within this trial, most women opt for active surveillance, even though clinical guidelines still recommend treatment for all women with DCIS. Women with low-risk DCIS report high levels of trust in their physicians and the safety of active surveillance. Their preferences also highlight the necessity to proof that de-escalating treatment of low-risk DCIS is safe. Citation Format: Renée S. Schmitz, Ellen G. Engelhardt, Miranda A. Gerritsma, Carine M. Sondermeijer, Sena Alaeikhanehshir, Ellen Verschuur, Marja van Oirsouw, Julia Houtzager, Rosalie Griffioen, Nina Bijker, Ritse M. Mann, Frederieke van Duijnhoven, Jelle Wesseling, Eveline Bleiker. Active surveillance versus conventional treatment in low-risk DCIS; women’s preferences in the LORD trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-05-11.

Spectrum of histopathological patterns of breast lesions in a tertiary care hospital

Background: Breast lesions are areas of abnormal breast tissue. It is estimated that 20% of women develop breast lesions. Breast lesions are either benign or malignant. Breast carcinomas are the most common cause of deaths in women accounting for 10.6% deaths in India, 6.9% deaths per year globally. Aims and Objectives: To study various histopathological patterns of breast lesions in women admitted in Government General Hospital. Materials and Methods: It is a prospective study in the department of pathology, Government General Hospital, Nizamabad, from December 2020 to July 2022. Grossing was done and details noted, tissue bits were processed and sections were stained with conventional H and E Staining. Results: Out of 70 cases of breast lesions, 55 (78.5%) are benign breast lesions and 15 (21.5%) are malignant breast lesions. Fibroadenoma is the most common breast lesion accounting for 33 cases, that is, 60 %, followed by fibrocystic diseases (21.8%). Infiltrating ductal carcinoma of No Special Type is the most common malignant breast lesion accounting for 10 cases, that is, 66.6%. Among invasive breast carcinomas, the majority of cases are Grade II (69%). Conclusion: Study of histopathological patterns of breast lesions plays an important role in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of breast lesions. This study highlighted incidence and pathological characteristics of a wide range of breast lesions.

Cytomorphological patterns of breast lesions among women with palpable breast lumps attending select teaching and referral hospitals in Kenya: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

breast lumps account for a greater number of lesions in women attending surgical clinics in the developing world. Breast cancer which mostly presents as a breast lump is the leading cancer in Kenya, with an incidence of 12.5%. The study aims to describe the patterns of breast lesions in women presenting with palpable breast lumps in two major referral hospitals in Kenya. seven hundred and sixty-eight study participants with palpable lumps underwent fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Sociodemographic data were captured using structured questionnaires. The FNAC materials were evaluated using the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System (IACYS) and the lesions were classified into five-tier categories. Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize qualitative variables. of 768 smears, 84.8% (n=651) were adequate for evaluation while 15.2% (n=117) were inadequate. Neoplastic lesions comprised 84.5% (n=550) and non-neoplastic 15.5% (n=101). Benign lesions accounted for 83.6% of the lesions followed by breast carcinoma (10.4%). Ductal carcinoma comprised 98.5% of cancerous lesions. The age group most affected with ductal carcinoma and suspicious lesions was 20-34 years (37.3% and 55.6% respectively). Fibroadenoma formed the bulk of the benign lesions identified (44.1%). Suspicious of malignancy was 4.1% (n=27). The age group with the most lesions (47.5%) was 20-34 years. a wide spectrum of breast lesions was established. Such include inflammatory, atypical, benign, suspicious of malignancy, and malignant lesions. Fibroadenoma was a common lesion diagnosed. The age group most affected by malignant lesions was 16-49 years, necessitating enhanced screening of women with breast lumps in our setups.

Automated breast ultrasound: A comparison study with handheld ultrasound in detection and characterization of lesions in mammographically dense breast

Background: Although mammography is a powerful screening tool in detection of early breast cancer, it is imperfect, particularly for women with dense breast, which have a higher risk to develop cancer and decrease the sensitivity of mammogram, Automated breast ultrasound is a recently introduced ultrasonography technique, developed with the purpose to standardize breast ultrasonography and overcome some limitations of handheld ultrasound, this study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Automated breast ultrasound and compare it with handheld ultrasound in the detection and characterization of breast lesions in women with dense breasts. Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Automated breast ultrasound and compare it with hand held ultrasound in detection and characterization of breast lesions in women with dense breast. Subjects and Methods: A prospective observational study conducted at Oncology Teaching Hospital during the period of ten months from 1st of February till 1st of December 2020. Included 62 women with dense breasts on diagnostic mammograms. All women underwent technician performed automated breast ultrasound and radiologist performed handheld ultrasound for both breasts. All suspicious lesions with selected probably benign lesions underwent biopsy, handheld ultrasound detected 48 masses (67.6%), 15 of them (21.1%) were cystic, automated breast ultrasound detected 54 masses (76.1%); 20 of them (28.2%) were cystic. The sensitivity of handheld ultrasound was=87.5%, Specificity=58.8%, the sensitivity of automated breast ultrasound was=93.8%, Specificity=70.6%. Conclusion: Automated breast ultrasound is an effective modality to detect occult breast lesion in women with dense breasts, automated breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound have a reliable agreement in detection and characterization of breast lesions with higher accuracy of automated breast ultrasound in the evaluation of malignant lesions.

Digital breast tomosynthesis-based peritumoral radiomics approaches in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)-based radiomics in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions in women. METHODS A total of 185 patients who underwent DBT scans were enrolled between December 2017 and June 2019. The features of handcrafted and deep learning-based radiomics were extracted from the tumoral and peritumoral regions with different radial dilation distances outside the tumor. A 3-step method was used to select discriminative features and develop the radiomics signature. Discriminative clinical factors were identified by univariate logistic regression. The clinical fac- tors with P < .05 were used to build a clinical model with multivariate logistic regression. The radiomics nomogram was developed by integrating the radiomics signature and discriminative clinical factors. Discriminative performance of the radiomics signature, clinical model, nomo- gram, and breast imaging reporting and data system assessment were evaluated and compared with the receiver operating characteristic and decision curves analysis (DCA). RESULTS A total of 2 handcrafted and 2 deep features were identified as the most discriminative features from the peritumoral regions with 2 mm dilation distances and used to develop the radiomics signature. The nomogram incorporating the radiomics signature, age, and menstruation status showed the best discriminative performance with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.980 (95% CI, 0.960 to 1.000; sensitivity =0.970, specificity =0.946) in the training cohort and 0.985 (95% CI, 0.960 to 1.000; sensitivity = 0.909, specificity = 0.966) in the validation cohort. DCA con- firmed the potential clinical usefulness of our nomogram. CONCLUSION Our results illustrate that the radiomics nomogram integrating the DBT imaging features and clinical factors (age and menstruation status) can be considered as a useful tool in aiding the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Shear-Wave Elastography for Breast Lesion Characterization in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of 2-D shear-wave elastography (SWE) for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions in women with abnormal findings on mammography. Included in this review are studies of diagnostic accuracy published before June 2021 using 2-D SWE to evaluate female breast lesions. Included studies were required to include at least 50 lesions, report quantitative shear-wave speed (SWS) thresholds, and include a reference standard of either biopsy or 2-year stability. Included studies used the mean, maximum, minimum, or SD of SWS for classification. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Ovid-MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed. Bias and applicability of the studies were assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. A hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model was used to arrive at the summary statistics. Eighty-seven prospective and retrospective studies were included, encompassing 17,810 women (mean age 42.3 ± 10.4 years) with 19,043 lesions (7,623 malignant). Summary sensitivities and specificities, respectively, were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.88) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.88) for mean SWS, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.85) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.90) for the maximum, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74-0.93) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69-0.89) for the minimum, and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77-0.86) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91) for the SD. Alternatively, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.94), 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.94), 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.96), and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.88-0.94), respectively. This review demonstrates the discriminative power of SWE in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Using the resulting likelihood ratios, SWE may prove beneficial in downgrading BI-RADS® 4a or upgrading BI-RADS 3 lesions. However, current society guidelines do not provide definitive recommendations regarding the use of SWE and its counterpart strain elastography (SE). Comparison with our results suggests that SE alone or a combination of SE and SWE may provide better diagnostic performance than SWE alone and serve as an adjunct to current diagnostic techniques.

Prevalence of different breast lesions in women of southern Punjab, Pakistan, characterized on high-resolution ultrasound and mammography

BackgroundThe aim of the study is to characterize the breast lesions on high-resolution Ultrasound and digital mammography to find the patterns and prevalence of different breast lesions in different age groups of our population.ResultsThis prospective study was conducted at a breast care clinic of a tertiary care hospital from Jan 2018 to Dec 2019. Patients with breast-related complaints were enrolled. Patients under the 35 years of age were evaluated on High-Resolution Ultrasound (HR-USG) and those over 35 years of age on digital Mammography. Any lesion on digital mammography was characterized on HR-USG. Fine Needle Aspiration (FNAC) and Trucut biopsy was done where pathological correlation required. Data of all enrolled patients were recorded and analyzed. Patients with known cases of carcinoma breast on follow-up were excluded from the study. Total 6850 patients enrolled in our breast care clinic during study period. 5111 were above the age of 35 years while 1739 were under the age of 35 years. No lesion could be found in 3915 patients and were reported normal. 2935 patients were found to have different breast lesions. The frequency of different lesions was different in both age groups. The overall frequency of lesions was as malignancy 16.2%, benign lesions including Fibroadenoma, simple cysts, Lipoma and Galactocele 16%, inflammatory lesions including abscess 7.86% and Duct Ectasia 2.75%.ConclusionsIn developing countries where mass screening programs are deficient, Breast Care clinics in tertiary care hospitals have a noteworthy role in early detection of breast cancer and other breast lesions.

Does contrast-enhanced mammography have an impact on the detection of cancer in patients with risk of developing breast cancer?

BackgroundContrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has been discovered to be more sensitive and specific than two-dimensional full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in both screening and diagnostic settings. The aim of the study was to assess the additive role of CEM in the detection and characterization of breast lesions in women with increased risk of developing breast cancer. This prospective study included 283 female patients with increased risk of developing breast cancer (i.e., positive family history of breast cancer, personal history of breast cancer, and heterogeneously dense mammary parenchyma) coming for either screening (n = 127/283 (49.1%)) or diagnostic (n = 156/283 (55.1%)) purpose. All patients had FFDM and CEM done, and the findings were evaluated independently; final Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BIRADS) classification was given for each modality. Results were then compared with histopathology or ultrasound findings with routine follow-up for normal and typically benign findings.ResultsIn this study, 283 women with mean age of 48 were enrolled. Among the studied cases regardless to a specific risk factor, 15/283 (5.3%) were diagnosed as normal, 13/283 (4.6%) as inflammatory lesions, 72/283(25.4%) as benign lesions, 6/283 (2.1%) as benign precancerous lesions, and 177/283 (62.5%) as malignant. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the CEM were 92.7 and 71.43 %, respectively, while FFDM were 80.90 and 59.05%, respectively.ConclusionContrast-enhanced mammography is a valuable screening and diagnostic imaging modality in patients with increased risk of developing breast cancer with diagnostic indices higher than mammography resulting in a significantly higher cancer detection rate.

Breast lesions in women under 25\u2009years: radiologic-pathologic correlation

BackgroundThe majority of breast lesions in women under 25 years are being benign. Imaging is important for diagnosis and selecting patients for further procedures. Although malignancy is rare in this group of patients, suspected lesions must be biopsied. Imaging is very important in the selection of patients for radiological intervention. Understanding of the clinical, pathologic, and imaging features allows the radiologist to guide proper management of these patients. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of different breast lesions in symptomatic women under 25 years and the value of radiological imaging in the diagnosis.ResultsThis was a retrospective study; a total number of 250 cases with breast lumps under 25 years of age were registered in the PACKS of our institution in the period from January 01, 2017 to December 31, 2018. Two hundred three cases coped with our inclusion criteria that include available histopathological results either by biopsy or after surgery based on their referring physicians decision. Our exclusion criteria were those cases (47) with definite BIRADS 2 lesions with no available pathology reports. Ultrasonography was done to all patients (203 cases) and MRI was performed to 26 cases. All cases were histologically verified; their findings were reviewed and compared to radiological findings.A total of 203 symptomatic breast lesions were received at the radiological department in women under 25 years; there were 115 (56.7%) benign, 85 (41.9%) cystic, and 3 (1.5%) malignant lumps. The commonest benign lesion was fibroadenoma (104 cases, 51.2%) and all the malignant lesions were invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (3 cases, 1.47%). The p value is > 0.05, so there were no differences between examination using the ultrasonography and the MRI imaging compared to histopathological results.ConclusionsMost breast lesions in young women are benign. Ultrasonography is an essential first imaging modality in the diagnosis of women under 25 years with breast lesions.

Breast Lesions in Women Aged Younger than 30 Years: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management.

Women aged younger than 30 years frequently present with palpable breast lesions, breast pain, and nipple discharge. Diagnostic work-up often results in benign findings, including a variety of benign solid masses, infectious or inflammatory conditions, pregnancy- or lactation-related abnormalities, and normal variants. While rare, breast cancer can occur within this demographic, and it is often more advanced and aggressive than in older women. Other rare tumors can present within this patient demographic, including primary sarcoma of the breast and granular cell tumors. A knowledge of the clinical presentation, diagnostic approach, and management of this spectrum of pathologic entities is crucial to ensure optimal and cost-effective care within this patient demographic.

How can additional ultrasonography screening improve the detection of occult breast cancer in women with dense breasts?

PurposeAlthough mammography is a gold standard for breast cancer screening, the number of cancers that cannot be detected with mammography is substantial, especially in dense-breast (DB) women. Breast sonography can be a useful and powerful screening tool in these cases. The aim of this study is to assess the application of whole-breast sonography in the evaluation of breast lesions in women with DB tissue and estimate its accuracy in comparison with mammography.Material and methodsA total of 207 asymptomatic DB women participated in this study. The breast tissue density was assessed using ACR BI-RADS. Patients underwent high-resolution ultrasonography of the breast in addition to physical examination and mammography. Different risk factors were also assessed.Results152 of 207 (73.4%) cases who had mammography performed had DB, and 55 (26.6%) cases had very dense breasts (very DBs). None of the cases had a positive history of malignancy, while 19% of them had a positive history of breast cancer in first- or second-degree relatives.ConclusionsAll findings were higher in cases with DB compared to very DBs except for fibroadenoma, which was detected more in cases with very DBs. Our study showed that the prevalence of different breast lesions had a significant relationship with the density of the breast. In our study, 48.3% of the cases were diagnosed with a lesion in their sonography result, although 81.0% of them were benign lesions, and the other 19.0% needed follow-up or biopsy evaluation. A substantial number of mammographically occult breast lesions, either benign or malignant, could be detected by ultrasound in DB tissue.

Abstract A54: Circulating miR-15a, miR-101, and miR-144 to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions in women with BI-RADS 4 mammography

Abstract BI-RADS 4 category reports suspicious breast lesions in mammograms, which have 23-34% chance of malignancy and require core biopsies for diagnosis confirmation. New biomarkers are needed and have been sought to improve diagnose in those patients. Once the human plasma contains a large number of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs), variations in their circulating levels have been associated with pathologic conditions, including cancer. We hypothesized that miRNA circulating level can be used to separate malignant from benign breast lesions in BI-RADS 4 patients. In this context, here we compared the circulating levels of 1,805 miRNAs in cancer patients (BI-RADS 5 or 6 mammography) and controls (BI-RADS 1 or 2 mammography) using miRNome PCR array to identify cancer-associated alterations in circulating miRNA levels. miRNAs with altered circulating levels in cancer patients were validated by qRT-PCR in an independent cohort and then investigated as biomarkers to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions in women with BI-RADS 4 mammography. We identified 12 miRNAs with different circulating levels (&amp;gt;1.5x and a p-value &amp;lt; 0.05) between controls and cancer patients. Altered circulating levels for 3 of these miRNAs (miR-15a, miR-101, and miR-144) were validated in an independent cohort of cancer patients. Next, we investigated the level of those three miRNAs in BI-RADS 4 patients and constructed an artificial neural network to test the capacity of this miRNA circulating profile to detect malignant breast lesions in women with BI-RADS 4 mammography. We found that the circulating levels of miR-15a, miR-101, and miR-144 were efficient to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesion with 92% of accuracy. In this work, we demonstrated how miRNAs circulating levels can be used as biomarkers to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions in women with BI-RADS 4 mammography and concluded that circulating miRNAs can be useful to improve breast cancer diagnosis. Citation Format: Julia Alejandra Pezuk, Thiago Luiz Araujo Miller, José Luiz Barbosa Bevilacqua, Alfredo Carlos Simões Barros, Felipe Eduardo Martins de Andrade, Luiza Freire de Andrade e Macedo, Amanda Natasha Menardo Claro, Anamaria Aranha Camargo, Pedro Alexandre Favoretto Galante, Luiz Fernando Lima Reis. Circulating miR-15a, miR-101, and miR-144 to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions in women with BI-RADS 4 mammography [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR International Conference held in cooperation with the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) on Translational Cancer Medicine; May 4-6, 2017; São Paulo, Brazil. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2018;24(1_Suppl):Abstract nr A54.

Retrospective analysis of the utility of multiparametric MRI for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions in women in China

We explored the utility of time-resolved angiography with interleaved stochastic trajectories dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (TWIST DCE-MRI), readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging- diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (RESOLVE-DWI), and echo-planar imaging- diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (EPI-DWI) for distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions.This retrospective analysis included female patients with breast lesions seen at a single center in China between January 2016 and April 2016. Patients were allocated to a benign or malignant group based on pathologic diagnosis. All patients received routine MRI, RESOLVE-DWI, EPI-DWI, and TWIST DCE-T1WI. Variables measured included quantitative parameters (Ktrans, Kep, and Ve), semiquantitative parameters (rate of contrast enhancement for contrast agent inflow [W-in], rate of contrast decay for contrast agent outflow [W-out], and time-to-peak enhancement after contrast agent injection [TTP]) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for RESOLVE-DWI (ADCr) and EPI-DWI (ADCe). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic utility of each parameter for differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions.A total of 87 patients were included (benign, n = 20; malignant, n = 67). Compared with the benign group, the malignant group had significantly higher Ktrans, Kep and W-in and significantly lower W-out, TTP, ADCe, and ADCr (all P < .05); Ve was not significantly different between groups. RESOLVE-DWI was superior to conventional EPI-DWI at illustrating lesion boundary and morphology, while ADCr was significantly lower than ADCe in all patients. Kep, W-out, ADCr, and ADCe showed the highest diagnostic efficiency (based on AUC value) for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. Combining 3 parameters (Kep, W-out, and ADCr) had a higher diagnostic efficiency (AUC, 0.965) than any individual parameter and distinguished between benign and malignant lesions with high sensitivity (91.0%), specificity (95.0%), and accuracy (91.9%).An index combining Kep, W-out, and ADCr could potentially be used for the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.

Measuring plasma levels of three microRNAs can improve the accuracy for identification of malignant breast lesions in women with BI-RADS 4 mammography

A BI-RADS category of 4 from a mammogram indicates suspicious breast lesions, which require core biopsies for diagnosis and have an approximately one third chance of being malignant. Human plasma contains many circulating microRNAs, and variations in their circulating levels have been associated with pathologies, including cancer. Here, we present a novel methodology to identify malignant breast lesions in women with BI-RADS 4 mammography. First, we used the miRNome array and qRT-PCR to define circulating microRNAs that were differentially represented in blood samples from women with breast tumor (BI-RADS 5 or 6) in comparison to controls (BI-RADS 1 or 2). Next, we used qRT-PCR to quantify the level of this circulating microRNAs in patients with mammograms presenting with BI-RADS category 4. Finally, we developed a machine learning method (Artificial Neural Network - ANN) that receives circulating microRNA levels and automatically classifies BI-RADS 4 breast lesions as malignant or benign. We identified a minimum set of three circulating miRNAs (miR-15a, miR-101 and miR-144) with altered levels in patients with breast cancer. These three miRNAs were quantified in plasma from 60 patients presenting biopsy-proven BI-RADS 4 lesions. Finally, we constructed a very efficient ANN that could correctly classify BI-RADS 4 lesions as malignant or benign with approximately 92.5% accuracy, 95% specificity and 88% sensibility. We believe that our strategy of using circulating microRNA and a machine learning method to classify BI-RADS 4 breast lesions is a non-invasive, non-stressful and valuable complementary approach to core biopsy in women with BI-RADS 4 lesions.

P314 - The value of peroperative radiographic scanning by biovision (FAXITRON®) at operation theatre for localization of breast lesions in women with early breast cancer

P314 - The value of peroperative radiographic scanning by biovision (FAXITRON®) at operation theatre for localization of breast lesions in women with early breast cancer

Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Breast Lesions: Results and Usefulness in a Low Income Country

Background: Core needle biopsy (CNB) under ultrasound guidance is an accepted standard of care for the diagnosis of breast lesions. It is safe, cost-effective and minimally invasive compared with surgical excision. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the CNB’s results regarding the procedure, complications, histopathological findings and their correlation with the imaging data and surgical histopathological findings. Method: A cross-sectional prospective and descriptive study of a consecutive series of ultrasound-guided CNB of breast lesions in women conduced from January 2015 to December 2016 at the Sylvanus Olympio university hospital of Lomé, in Togo. Results: There were 72 CNB performed under ultrasound guidance in women; from which 54 were retained for the study. The mean age was 44.9 years ± 9.8. 11.1% had a family history of breast cancer. Lesions were most often palpable (90.7%). They were located in the left breast in 54.7%. Lesions were categorized probably malignant or malignant (Birads 4 and 5) in 70.4% and probably benign (Birads 3) in 29.6%. Their mean size was 24.8 mm ± 7.6 at ultrasound. There were no major complications during the procedure. One CNB (1.9%) considered inconclusive was repeated. Histologically, invasive ductal carcinoma (61.1%) was the most common lesion. Fifty-three women underwent surgical procedure and histopathological confirmation. Ultrasound-guided CNB had a sensitivity of 97.5%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 92.8%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 98.1%. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (Birads) categorization had a sensitivity of 94.8%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 87.4%, and diagnostic accuracy of 96.2%. Conclusion: Ultrasound guided CNB represent accurate methods for the characterization of breast lesions, with high values of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value. It does not involve a major complication, even in tropical environments.