Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System Category Research Articles

The application of computer-aided diagnosis in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System ultrasound training for residents-a randomized controlled study.

The consistency of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification among experienced radiologists is different, which is difficult for inexperienced radiologists to master. This study aims to explore the value of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) (AI-SONIC breast automatic detection system) in the BI-RADS training for residents. A total of 12 residents who participated in the first year and the second year of standardized resident training in Ningbo No. 2 Hospital from May 2020 to May 2021 were randomly divided into 3 groups (Group 1, Group 2, Group 3) for BI-RADS training. They were asked to complete 2 tests and questionnaires at the beginning and end of the training. After the first test, the educational materials were given to the residents and reviewed during the breast imaging training month. Group 1 studied independently, Group 2 studied with CAD, and Group 3 was taught face-to-face by experts. The test scores and ultrasonographic descriptors of the residents were evaluated and compared with those of the radiology specialists. The trainees' confidence and recognition degree of CAD were investigated by questionnaire. There was no statistical significance in the scores of residents in the first test among the 3 groups (P=0.637). After training and learning, the scores of all 3 groups of residents were improved in the second test (P=0.006). Group 2 (52±7.30) and Group 3 (54±5.16) scored significantly higher than Group 1 (38±3.65). The consistency of ultrasonographic descriptors and final assessments between the residents and senior radiologists were improved (κ3 > κ2 > κ1), with κ2 and κ3 >0.4 (moderately consistent with experts), and κ1 =0.225 (fairly agreed with experts). The results of the questionnaire showed that the trainees had increased confidence in BI-RADS classification, especially Group 2 (1.5 to 3.5) and Group 3 (1.25 to 3.75). All trainees agreed that CAD was helpful for BI-RADS learning (Likert scale score: 4.75 out of 5) and were willing to use CAD as an aid (4.5, max. 5). The AI-SONIC breast automatic detection system can help residents to quickly master BI-RADS, improve the consistency between residents and experts, and help to improve the confidence of residents in the classification of BI-RADS, which may have potential value in the BI-RADS training for radiology residents. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400081672).

Investigation of imaging features in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of benign and malignant breast lesions

PurposeThis study aimed to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using gadobutrol for differentiating benign breast lesions from malignant ones. Moreover, this study sought to address the limitations of current imaging techniques and criteria based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).Materials and MethodsIn a multicenter retrospective study conducted in Japan, 200 women were included, comprising 100 with benign lesions and 100 with malignant lesions, all classified under BI-RADS categories 3 and 4. The MRI protocol included 3D fast gradient echo T1- weighted images with fat suppression, with gadobutrol as the contrast agent. The analysis involved evaluating patient and lesion characteristics, including age, size, location, fibroglandular tissue, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), signal intensity, and the findings of mass and non-mass enhancement. In this study, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, along with decision tree analysis, to identify significant predictors for the classification of lesions.ResultsDifferences in lesion characteristics were identified, which may influence malignancy risk. The multivariate logistic regression model revealed age, lesion location, shape, and signal intensity as significant predictors of malignancy. Decision tree analysis identified additional diagnostic factors, including lesion margin and BPE level. The decision tree models demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with the logistic regression model showing an area under the curve of 0.925 for masses and 0.829 for non-mass enhancements.ConclusionThis study underscores the importance of integrating patient age, lesion location, and BPE level into the BI-RADS criteria to improve the differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions. This approach could minimize unnecessary biopsies and enhance clinical decision-making in breast cancer diagnostics, highlighting the effectiveness of gadobutrol in breast MRI evaluations.

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System evaluation of breast lesions improved with virtual touch tissue imaging average grayscale values.

Early breast cancer diagnosis is of great clinical importance for selecting treatment options, improving prognosis, and enhancing the quality of patients' survival. We investigated the value of virtual touch tissue imaging average grayscale values (VAGV) helper Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) in diagnosing breast malignancy. We retrospectively analyzed 141 breast tumors in 134 patients. All breast lesions were diagnosed pathologically by biopsy or surgical excision. All patients first underwent conventional ultrasound (US) followed by virtual touch tissue imaging (VTI). The measurement of the VAGV of the lesion was performed by Image J software. BI-RADS classification was performed for each lesion according to the US. We performed a two-by-two comparison of the diagnostic values of VAGV, BI-RADS, and BI-RADS+VAGV. VAGV was lower in malignant tumors than in benign ones (35.82 ± 13.39 versus 73.58 ± 42.69, P< 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value, sensitivity, and specificity of VAGV was 0.834, 84.09%, and 69.07%, respectively. Among BI-RADS, VAGV, and BI-RADS+VAGV, BI-RADS+VAGV had the highest AUC (0.926 versus 0.882, P= 0.0066; 0.926 versus 0.834, P= 0.0012). There was perfect agreement between the two radiologists using VAGV (ICC= 0.9796) and substantial agreement using BI-RADS (Kappa= 0.725). Our study shows that VAGV can accurately diagnose breast cancer. VAGV effectively improves the diagnostic performance of BI-RADS.

Classification of multi-feature fusion ultrasound images of breast tumor within category 4 using convolutional neural networks.

Breast tumor is a fatal threat to the health of women. Ultrasound (US) is a common and economical method for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category 4 has the highest false-positive value of about 30% among five categories. The classification task in BI-RADS category 4 is challenging and has not been fully studied. This work aimed to use convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for breast tumor classification using B-mode images in category 4 to overcome the dependence on operator and artifacts. Additionally, this work intends to take full advantage of morphological and textural features in breast tumor US images to improve classification accuracy. First, original US images coming directly from the hospital were cropped and resized. In 1385 B-mode US BI-RADS category 4 images, the biopsy eliminated 503 samples of benign tumor and left 882 of malignant. Then, K-means clustering algorithm and entropy of sliding windows of US images were conducted. Considering the diversity of different characteristic information of malignant and benign represented by original B-mode images, K-means clustering images and entropy images, they are fused in a three-channel form multi-feature fusion images dataset. The training, validation, and test sets are 969, 277, and 139. With transfer learning, 11 CNN models including DenseNet and ResNet were investigated. Finally, by comparing accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under curve (AUC) of the results, models which had better performance were selected. The normality of data was assessed by Shapiro-Wilk test. DeLong test and independent t-test were used to evaluate the significant difference of AUC and other values. False discovery rate was utilized to ultimately evaluate the advantages of CNN with highest evaluation metrics. In addition, the study of anti-log compression was conducted but no improvement has shown in CNNs classification results. With multi-feature fusion images, DenseNet121 has highest accuracy of 80.22±1.45% compared to other CNNs, precision of 77.97±2.89% and AUC of 0.82±0.01. Multi-feature fusion improved accuracy of DenseNet121 by 1.87% from classification of original B-mode images (p<0.05). The CNNs with multi-feature fusion show a good potential of reducing the false-positive rate within category 4. The work illustrated that CNNs and fusion images have the potential to reduce false-positive rate in breast tumor within US BI-RADS category 4, and make the diagnosis of category 4 breast tumors to be more accurate and precise.

Classification of BI-RADS using convolutional neural network and effecientNet-B7

From its development, image processing technology has become increasingly complex, such as detecting cancer in an image. In this context, the American College of Radiology (ACR) has developed a standard format and terminology called the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). The aim of this research is to determine whether CNN can classify BI-RADS types (C1, C2, C3, C4), the best model, and the classification results of BI-RADS types on mammograms using CNN, and the best values for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision. Google Colaboratory and machine learning libraries were used in this research to create machine learning for BI-RADS classification. Then, a dataset from Kaggle titled "Mini-DDSM: Mammography-based Automatic Age Estimation" by Lekamlage et al., from the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), Kyoto, Japan, was utilized. Based on the research, an accuracy of 85.9% was achieved for Category 1 classification. Category 2 classification attained an accuracy of 77.9%. The accuracy for Category 3 classification was 81.4%, and for Category 4, it reached 90.8%.

Unenhanced Breast MRI With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection: Effects of Training on Performance and Agreement of Subspecialty Radiologists.

To investigate whether reader training improves the performance and agreement of radiologists in interpreting unenhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). A study of 96 breasts (35 cancers, 24 benign, and 37 negative) in 48 asymptomatic women was performed between June 2019 and October 2020. High-resolution DWI with b-values of 0, 800, and 1200 sec/mm² was performed using a 3.0-T system. Sixteen breast radiologists independently reviewed the DWI, apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and T1-weighted MRI scans and recorded the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category for each breast. After a 2-h training session and a 5-month washout period, they re-evaluated the BI-RADS categories. A BI-RADS category of 4 (lesions with at least two suspicious criteria) or 5 (more than two suspicious criteria) was considered positive. The per-breast diagnostic performance of each reader was compared between the first and second reviews. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated using a multi-rater κ analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Before training, the mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 16 readers were 70.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.4-79.9), 90.8% (95% CI: 85.6-94.2), and 83.5% (95% CI: 78.6-87.4), respectively. After training, significant improvements in specificity (95.2%; 95% CI: 90.8-97.5; P = 0.001) and accuracy (85.9%; 95% CI: 80.9-89.8; P = 0.01) were observed, but no difference in sensitivity (69.8%; 95% CI: 58.1-79.4; P = 0.58) was observed. Regarding inter-reader agreement, the κ values were 0.57 (95% CI: 0.52-0.63) before training and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.74) after training, with a difference of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.02-0.18; P = 0.01). The ICC was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69-0.74) before training and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76-0.80) after training (P = 0.002). Brief reader training improved the performance and agreement of interpretations by breast radiologists using unenhanced MRI with DWI.

Characteristics of Suspicious Breast Lesions Visible Only on MR Imaging: Is It Possible to Classify into Immediate Biopsy and Careful Observation Groups?

To investigate the characteristics of suspicious MRI-only visible lesions and to explore the validity of subcategorizing these lesions into the following two groups: lesions that would require immediate biopsy (4Bi) and lesions for which careful clinical follow-up could be recommended (4Fo). A retrospective review of 108 MRI-only visible lesions in 106 patients who were diagnosed as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 between June 2018 and June 2022 at our institution was performed by two radiologists. The breast MR images were evaluated according to BI-RADS and additional MRI descriptors (linear ductal, branching, and apparent diffusion coefficient values). The lesions were categorized by previously reported classification systems, and the positive predictive values (PPVs) for the different categories were determined and compared. Subsequently, a new classification system was developed in this study. The total malignancy rate was 31% (34/108). No significant differences between benign and malignant lesions were identified for focus and mass lesions. For non-mass lesions, linear ductal and heterogeneous internal enhancement suggested a benign lesion (P = 0.0013 and P = 0.023, respectively), and branching internal enhancement suggested malignancy (P = 0.0066). Segmental distribution suggested malignancy (P = 0.0097). However, the PPV of segmental distribution with heterogeneous enhancement was significantly lower than that of category 4 segmental lesions with other enhancement patterns (11% vs. 59%; P = 0.0198).As a new classification, the distribution of focal, linear, and segmental was given a score of 0, 1, or 2, and the internal enhancement of heterogeneous, linear-ductal, clumped, branching, and clustered-ring enhancement was given a score of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. When categorized using a scoring system, a statistically significant difference in PPV was observed between 4Fo (n = 27) and 4Bi (n = 33) (7% vs. 61%, P = 0.000029). The new classification system was found to be highly capable of subcategorizing BI-RADS category 4 MRI-only visible non-mass lesions into 4Fo and 4Bi.

Diagnostic Utility of an Adjusted DWI Lexicon Using Multiple b-values to Evaluate Breast Lesions in Combination with BI-RADS.

We aimed to investigate the diagnostic feasibility of an adjusted diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lexicon using multiple b values to assess breast lesions according to DWI-based breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). This Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved prospective study included 127 patients with suspected breast cancer. Breast MRI was performed using a 3T scanner. Breast DW images were acquired using five b-values of 0, 200, 800, 1000, and 1500 s/mm2 (5b-value DWI) on 3T MRI. Two readers independently assessed lesion characteristics and normal breast tissue using DWI alone (5b-value DWI and 2b-value DWI with b = 0 and 800 s/mm2) according to DWI-based BI-RADS and in combination with the standard dynamic contrast-enhanced images (combined MRI). Interobserver and intermethod agreements were assessed using kappa statistics. The specificity and sensitivity of lesion classification were evaluated. Ninety-five breast lesions (39 malignant and 56 benign) were evaluated. Interobserver agreement for lesion assessment on 5b-value DWI was very good (k ≥ 0.82) for DWI-based BI-RADS categories, lesion type, and mass characteristics; good (k = 0.75) in breast composition; and moderate (k ≥ 0.44) in background parenchymal signal (BPS) and non-mass distribution. Intermethod agreement between assessments performed using either 5b-value DWI or combined MRI was good-to-moderate (k = 0.52-0.67) for lesion type; moderate (k = 0.49-0.59) for DWI-based BI-RADS category and mass characteristics; and fair (k = 0.25-0.40) for mass shape, BPS, and breast composition. The sensitivity and positive predictive values (PPVs) for 5b-value DWI were 79.5%, 84.6% and 60.8%, 61.1% for each reader, respectively; 74.4%, 74.4% and 63.0%, 61.7% for 2b-value DWI; and 97.4%, 97.4% and 73.1%, 76.0% for combined MRI. The specificity and negative predictive values (NPVs) were 64.3%, 62.5% and 81.8%, 85.4% for 5b-value DWI; 69.6%, 67.9% and 79.6%, 79.2% for 2b-value DWI; and 75.0%, 78.6% and 97.7%, 97.8% for combined MRI. Good observer agreement was observed in the 5b-value DWI. The 5b-value DWI based on multiple b-values might have the potential to complement the 2b-value DWI; however, their diagnostic performance tended to be inferior to that of combined MRI for the characterization of breast tumors.

Are we ready to stratify BI-RADS 4 lesions observed on magnetic resonance imaging? A real-world noninferiority/equivalence analysis.

To demonstrate that positive predictive values (PPVs) for suspicious (category 4) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings that have been stratified are equivalent to those stipulated in the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for mammography and ultrasound. This retrospective analysis of electronic medical records generated between January 4, 2016 and December 29, 2021 provided 365 patients in which 419 suspicious (BI-RADS category 4) findings were subcategorized as BI-RADS 4A, 4B or 4C. Malignant and nonmalignant outcomes were determined by pathologic analyses, follow-up, or both. For each subcategory, the level 2 PPV (PPV2) was calculated and tested for equivalence/noninferiority against the established benchmarks. Of the 419 findings evaluated, 168 (40.1%) were categorized as malignant and 251 (59.9%) were categorized as nonmalignant. The PPV2 for subcategory 4A was 14.2% (95% CI: 9.3-20.4%), whereas it was 41.2% (95% CI: 32.8-49.9%) for subcategory 4B and 77.2% (95% CI: 68.4-84.5%) for subcategory 4C. Multivariate analysis showed a significantly different cancer yield for each subcategory (p < 0.001). We found that stratification of suspicious findings by MRI criteria is feasible, and malignancy probabilities for sub-categories 4B and 4C are equivalent to the values established for the other imaging methods in the BI-RADS. Nevertheless, low suspicion (4A) findings might show slightly higher malignancy rates.

Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Mammographic Detection of Breast Cancer in Saudi Arabian Women

Background: Breast cancer has a 14.8% incidence rate and an 8.5% fatality rate in Saudi Arabia. Mammography is useful for the early detection of breast cancer. Researchers have been developing artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for early breast cancer diagnosis and reducing false-positive mammography results. The aim of this study was to examine the performance and accuracy of an AI system in breast cancer screening among Saudi women. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study that included 378 mammograms collected from 2017 to 2021 from government hospitals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The patients’ demographic and clinical information were collected from files and electronic medical records. The radiologists’ assessments of the mammograms were based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) scores. Follow-up or biopsy reports verified the radiologists’ findings. The MammoScreen system was the AI tool used in this study. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 25. Results: The patients’ mean age was 50.31 years. Most patients had breast density B (42.3%) followed by A (27.2%) and C (25.9%). Most malignant cases were invasive ductal carcinomas (37.3%). Of the 181 cancer cases, 36.9% were BIRADS category V. The area under the curve for the AI detection (0.923; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.893–0.954) was greater than that for the radiologists’ interpretation (0.838; 95% CI, 0.796–0.881). The AI detection agreed with the histopathological result in 167 positive (91.3%) and 182 negative cases (93.3%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the AI system were 92.8%, 91.9%, 91.3%, 93.3%, and 92.3%, respectively. The radiologist’s interpretation agreed with the pathology report in 180 positive (73.8%) and 134 negative cases (100%). Its sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 100%, 67.7%, 73.8%, 100%, and 83.1%, respectively. Conclusions: The AI system tested in this study had better accuracy and diagnostic performance than the radiologists and thus could be used as a support diagnostic tool for breast cancer detection in clinical practice and to reduce false-positive recalls.

Evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and mammographic density as predictors of response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer

Background Response rates vary among breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST). Thus, there is a need for reliable treatment predictors. Evidence suggests tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) predict NAST response. Still, TILs are seldom used clinically as a treatment determinant. Mammographic density (MD) is another potential marker for NAST benefit and its relationship with TILs is unknown. Our aims were to investigate TILs and MD as predictors of NAST response and to study the unexplored relationship between TILs and MD. Material and methods We studied 315 invasive breast carcinomas treated with NAST between 2013 and 2020. Clinicopathological data were retrieved from medical records. The endpoint was defined as pathological complete response (pCR) in the breast. TILs were evaluated in pre-treatment core biopsies and categorized as high (≥10%) or low (<10%). MD was scored (a–d) according to the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) fifth edition. Binary logistic regression and Spearman’s test of correlation were performed using SPSS. Results Out of 315 carcinomas, 136 achieved pCR. 94 carcinomas had high TILs and 215 had low TILs. Six carcinomas had no available TIL data. The number of carcinomas in each BI-RADS category were 37, 122, 112, and 44 for a, b, c, and d, respectively. High TILs were independently associated with pCR (OR: 2.95; 95% CI: 1.59–5.46) compared to low TILs. In the univariable analysis, MD (BI-RADS d vs. a) showed a tendency of higher likelihood for pCR (OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 0.99–5.98). However, the association was non-significant, which is consistent with the result of the multivariable analysis (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 0.78–8.04). We found no correlation between TILs and MD (0.02; p = .80). Conclusion TILs significantly predicted NAST response. We could not define MD as a significant predictor of NAST response. These findings should be further replicated.

Exploring the Relationship Between CD 166 Expression and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Scores in Breast Cancer Patients and Healthy Volunteers.

This research embarked on a crucial endeavor to clarify the connection between levels of CD166 expression and the established Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) grading system. Through a comprehensive exploration of this correlation, the objective was to ascertain if CD166 could function as an additional biomarker, enhancing the predictive effectiveness of the BI-RADS classification. This prospective observational study involved 81 women with histopathologically confirmed early breast tumors and 81 radiologically confirmed healthy breast volunteers. The BI-RADS scores of all the participants included in the study were recorded. Before starting treatment, serum, saliva, and urine samples were collected. The CD166 levels were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The study involved the analysis and comparison of the mean and standard deviations of CD166 expression in serum, saliva, and urine across various BI-RADS categories. Notably, statistically significant differentiation was found (p=0.00) across all samples spanning the spectrum of BI-RADS categories. A progressive rise in CD166 concentration coincides with the increasing gradient of the BI-RADS category, implying a possible link between CD166 and breast cancer progression and severity.

Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence–Based Computer-Aided Detection Software for Automated Breast Ultrasound

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiologists following the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-aided detection software (CAD) in detecting suspicious lesions in automated breast ultrasounds (ABUS). ABUS-detected 262 breast lesions (histopathological verification; January 2020 to December 2022) were included. Two radiologists reviewed the images and assigned a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category. ABUS images were classified as positive or negative using AI-CAD. The BI-RADS category was readjusted in four ways: the radiologists modified the BI-RADS category using the AI results (AI-aided 1), upgraded or downgraded based on AI results (AI-aided 2), only upgraded for positive results (AI-aided 3), or only downgraded for negative results (AI-aided 4). The AI-aided diagnostic performances were compared to radiologists. The AI-CAD-positive and AI-CAD-negative cancer characteristics were compared. For 262 lesions (145 malignant and 117 benign) in 231 women (mean age, 52.2 years), the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of radiologists was 0.870 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.832-0.908). The AUC significantly improved to 0.919 (95% CI, 0.890-0.947; P=0.001) using AI-aided 1, whereas it improved without significance to 0.884 (95% CI, 0.844-0.923), 0.890 (95% CI, 0.852-0.929), and 0.890 (95% CI, 0.853-0.928) using AI-aided 2, 3, and 4, respectively. AI-CAD-negative cancers were smaller, less frequently exhibited retraction phenomenon,and had lower BI-RADS category. Among nonmass lesions, AI-CAD-negative cancers showed no posterior shadowing. AI-CAD implementation significantly improved the radiologists' diagnostic performance and may serve as a valuable diagnostic tool.

Development of a nomogram-based model combining intra- and peritumoral ultrasound radiomics with clinical features for differentiating benign from malignant in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3-5 nodules.

The differences in benign and malignant breast tumors are not only within the nodules but also involve changes in the surrounding tissues. Radiomics can reveal many details that are not discernible to the naked eye. This study aimed to distinguish between benign and malignant breast nodules using an ultrasound-based intra- and peritumoral radiomics model. This study retrospectively collected the information from 379 patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3-5 nodules and clear pathological diagnosis of breast nodules screened by routine ultrasound examination in the Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Shanghai Jiao Tong University from January 2017 to December 2022. The largest dimension of the lesion on the 2D ultrasound image was selected to outline the area of interest which was conformally and outwardly expanded automatically by 5 mm to extract intra- and peritumor radiomics features. The included cases were randomly divided into training sets and test sets in a ratio of 7:3. The optimal features of the included models were retained by statistical and machine learning methods of dimensionality reduction, and logistic regression was used as the classifier to build an intratumoral model and a combined intratumoral-peritumoral radiomics model, respectively; through single-factor and multifactor logistic regression, the optimal features that could predict benign and malignant breast tumors were screened. The clinical and imaging models were established by selecting independent risk factors as clinical and imaging features through univariate and multifactorial logistic regression. Among 379 BI-RADS category 3-5 breast nodules, there were 124 malignant nodules and 255 benign nodules; patients were aged 14 to 88 (46.22±15.51) years, and the age differences, radiomics score, and mass diameter between the training and test sets were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The intra- and peritumor radiomics model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.840 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.766-0.914] in the test set. The model with intra- and peritumoral ultrasound radiomics features combined with clinical features had an AUC value of 0.960 (95% CI: 0.920-0.999). The nomogram, developed using intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics features combined with clinical risk features, demonstrated superior performance in distinguishing between benign and malignant BI-RADS 3-5 lesions.

Diagnostic value of shear wave elastography combined with super microvascular imaging for BI-RADS 3-5 nodules.

To investigate the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE) and super microvascular imaging (SMI) integrated with the traditional ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) classification in differentiating between benign and malignant breast nodules. For analysis, 88 patients with 110 breast nodules assessed as BI-RADS 3-5 by conventional ultrasound were selected. SWE and SMI evaluations were conducted separately, and all nodules were verified as benign or malignant ones by pathology. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted after obtaining quantitative parameters of different shear waves of nodules, including maximum (Emax), mean (Emean), minimum (Emin) Young's modulus, modulus standard deviation (SD), and modulus ratio (Eratio). The best cut-off value, specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for diagnosing malignant nodules employing Emax were obtained, and the diagnostic value of combining Emax and BI-RADS classification was compared. SMI graded nodule based on the Alder blood flow grading standard, whereas the BI-RADS classification was based on microvascular morphology. We assessed the diagnostic value of SMI for breast nodules and investigated the diagnostic efficacy of SWE combined with SMI in differentiating benign and malignant breast nodules with BI-RADS classification 3-5. The adjusted the BI-RADS classification using SMI and SWE technologies promoted the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of discriminating benign and malignant breast nodules (P < 0.05). The combination of traditional ultrasound BI-RADS classification with SWE and SMI technologies offered high sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV for identifying benign and malignant breast lesions. Moreover, combining SWE and SMI technologies with the adjusted BI-RADS classificationhad the best diagnostic efficacy for distinguishing benign and malignant breast nodules with BI-RADS 3-5. The combination of SWE and SMI with the adjusted BI-RADS classification is a promising diagnostic method for differentiating benign and malignant breast nodules.

Problem Solving MRI to Reduce False-Positive Biopsy Related to Breast US: Conductivity vs. DWI vs. Abbreviated Contrast-Enhanced MRI.

While breast ultrasound (US) is a useful tool for diagnosing breast masses, it can entail false-positive biopsy results because of some overlapping features between benign and malignant breast masses and subjective interpretation. To evaluate the performance of conductivity imaging for reducing false-positive biopsy results related to breast US, as compared to diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and abbreviated MRI consisting of one pre- and one post-contrast T1-weighted imaging. Prospective. Seventy-nine women (median age, 44 years) with 86 Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 masses as detected by breast US. 3-T, T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence, DWI, and abbreviated contrast-enhanced MRI (T1-weighted gradient echo sequence). US-guided biopsy (reference standard) was obtained on the same day as MRI. The maximum and mean conductivity parameters from whole and single regions of interest (ROIs) were measured. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were obtained from an area with the lowest signal within a lesion on the ADC map. The performance of conductivity, ADC, and abbreviated MRI for reducing false-positive biopsies was evaluated using the following criteria: lowest conductivity and highest ADC values among malignant breast lesions and BI-RADS categories 2 or 3 on abbreviated MRI. One conductivity parameter with the maximum area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristics was selected. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. US-guided biopsy revealed 65 benign lesions and 21 malignant lesions. The mean conductivity parameter of the single ROI method was selected (AUC = 0.74). Considering conductivity (≤0.10 S/m), ADC (≥1.60 × 10-3 mm2 /sec), and BI-RADS categories 2 or 3 reduced false-positive biopsies by 23% (15 of 65), 38% (25 of 65), and 43% (28 of 65), respectively, without missing malignant lesions. Conductivity imaging may show lower performance than DWI and abbreviated MRI in reducing unnecessary biopsies. 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

The value of MRI for downgrading of breast suspicious lesions detected on ultrasound

BackgroundMost of suspicious lesions classified as breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 4A and 4B categories on ultrasound (US) were benign, resulting in unnecessary biopsies. MRI has a high sensitivity to detect breast cancer and high negative predictive value (NPV) to exclude malignancy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of breast MRI for downgrading of suspicious lesions with BI-RADS 4A and 4B categories on US.MethodsPatients who underwent breast MRI for suspicious lesions classified as 4A and 4B categories were included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists were aware of the details of suspicious lesions detected on US and evaluated MR images. MRI BI-RADS categories were given by consensus on the basis on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Pathological results and imaging follow-up at least 12 months were used as a reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), NPV and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for MRI findings.ResultsOne sixty seven patients with 186 lesions (US 4A category: 145, US 4B category: 41) consisted of the study cohort. The malignancy rate was 34.9% (65/186). On MRI, all malignancies showed true-positive results and 92.6% (112/121) benign lesions were correctly diagnosed. MRI increased PPV from 34.9% (65/186) to 87.8% (65/74) and reduced the false-positive biopsies by 92.6% (112/121). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of MRI were 100% (95% CI: 94.5%-100%), 92.6% (95% CI: 86.3%-96.5%), 87.8% (95% CI: 78.2%-94.3%) and 100% (95% CI: 96.8%-100%), respectively. 2.2% (4/186) of suspicious lesions were additionally detected on MRI, 75% (3/4) of which were malignant.ConclusionMRI could downgrade suspicious lesions classified as BI-RADS 4A and 4B categories on US and avoided unnecessary benign biopsies without missing malignancy. Additional suspicious lesions detected on MRI needed further work-up.

Comparative accuracy of sonography, mammography and the BI-RADS characterization of breast masses among adult women at Mulago Hospital, Uganda

Background Breast cancer is common among Ugandan women and mortality rate is significantly high. Uganda, like many low-income countries, has no national regular mammography screening programme, a gold standard in breast cancer imaging. Breast ultrasound and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification is thus being promoted as a supplemental evaluation tool for breast masses. However, studies on the comparative accuracy of breast sonography, mammography and BI-RADS from low-income settings are limited. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of breast ultrasound, mammography and BI-RADS classification against histology in the evaluation of breast masses among adult women. Methods This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Mulago National Referral Hospital involving women with breast masses. The women underwent breast ultrasound, mammography and needle biopsy for histological analysis. The breast lesions were also evaluated against the BI-RADS characterization criteria. Results Overall, 212 breast masses were evaluated and included in the analysis. Of these, 50% (106) were benign and 50% (106) were malignant. The sensitivity for ultrasound and mammography separately was 68.5% and 72.5% respectively. The sensitivity for ultrasound and mammography combined was 85%. BI-RADS 5 category had the highest sensitivity at 59.9% while the highest specificity was noted among BI-RADS 3 and 5 at 100%. The highest accuracy was noted in the BI-RADS 5 category at 79.9%. Conclusions Findings from this study demonstrate that combining ultrasound and mammography could have a higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy than when these imaging modalities are used independently. In addition, the BI-RADS reporting classification has an optimum positive predictive value and should be promoted to standardize breast imaging reporting.

Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance.

Background Automation bias (the propensity for humans to favor suggestions from automated decision-making systems) is a known source of error in human-machine interactions, but its implications regarding artificial intelligence (AI)-aided mammography reading are unknown. Purpose To determine how automation bias can affect inexperienced, moderately experienced, and very experienced radiologists when reading mammograms with the aid of an artificial intelligence (AI) system. Materials and Methods In this prospective experiment, 27 radiologists read 50 mammograms and provided their Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment assisted by a purported AI system. Mammograms were obtained between January 2017 and December 2019 and were presented in two randomized sets. The first was a training set of 10 mammograms, with the correct BI-RADS category suggested by the AI system. The second was a set of 40 mammograms in which an incorrect BI-RADS category was suggested for 12 mammograms. Reader performance, degree of bias in BI-RADS scoring, perceived accuracy of the AI system, and reader confidence in their own BI-RADS ratings were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and repeated-measures ANOVA followed by post hoc tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests followed by the Dunn post hoc test. Results The percentage of correctly rated mammograms by inexperienced (mean, 79.7% ± 11.7 [SD] vs 19.8% ± 14.0; P < .001; r = 0.93), moderately experienced (mean, 81.3% ± 10.1 vs 24.8% ± 11.6; P < .001; r = 0.96), and very experienced (mean, 82.3% ± 4.2 vs 45.5% ± 9.1; P = .003; r = 0.97) radiologists was significantly impacted by the correctness of the AI prediction of BI-RADS category. Inexperienced radiologists were significantly more likely to follow the suggestions of the purported AI when it incorrectly suggested a higher BI-RADS category than the actual ground truth compared with both moderately (mean degree of bias, 4.0 ± 1.8 vs 2.4 ± 1.5; P = .044; r = 0.46) and very (mean degree of bias, 4.0 ± 1.8 vs 1.2 ± 0.8; P = .009; r = 0.65) experienced readers. Conclusion The results show that inexperienced, moderately experienced, and very experienced radiologists reading mammograms are prone to automation bias when being supported by an AI-based system. This and other effects of human and machine interaction must be considered to ensure safe deployment and accurate diagnostic performance when combining human readers and AI. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Baltzer in this issue.

Combining primary tumor features derived from conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound facilitates the prediction of positive axillary lymph nodes in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 malignant breast lesions.

To determine whether the primary tumor features derived from conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) facilitate the prediction of positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) in breast cancer diagnosed as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4. A total of 240 women with breast cancer who underwent preoperative conventional US, strain elastography, and CEUS between September 2016 and December 2019 were included. The multiple parameters of the primary tumor were obtained, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to predict positive ALNs. Then three prediction models (conventional US features, CEUS features, and the combined features) were developed, and the diagnostic performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curves. On conventional US, the traits of large size and the non-circumscribed margin of the primary tumor were marked as two independent predictors. On CEUS, the features of vessel perforation or distortion and the enhanced range of the primary tumor were marked as two independent predictors for positive ALNs. Three prediction models were then developed: model A (conventional US features), model B (CEUS features), and model C (model A plus B). Model C yielded the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.88] compared with model A (AUC 0.74; 95% CI, 0.68-0.81; P = 0.008) and model B (AUC 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.80; P < 0.001) as per the DeLong test. CEUS, as a non-invasive examination technique, can be used to predict ALN metastasis. Combining conventional US and CEUS may produce favorable predictive accuracy for positive ALNs in BI-RADS category 4 breast cancer.