Breast Diffusion-weighted Imaging Research Articles

Fat-signal suppression in breast diffusion-weighted imaging: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.

Fat-signal suppression is essential for breast diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (or diffusion-weighted MRI, DWI) as the very low diffusion coefficient of fat tends to decrease absolute diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Among several methods, the STIR (short-tau inversion recovery) method is a popular approach, but signal suppression/attenuation is not specific to fat contrary to other methods such as SPAIR (spectral adiabatic (or attenuated) inversion recovery). This article focuses on those two techniques to illustrate the importance of appropriate fat suppression in breast DWI, briefly presenting the pros and cons of both approaches. We show here through simulation and data acquired in a dedicated breast DWI phantom made of vials with water and various concentrations of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) how ADC values obtained with STIR DWI may be biased toward tissue componentswith the longest T1 values: ADC values obtained with STIR fat suppression may be over/underestimated depending on the T1 and ADC profile within tissues. This bias is also illustrated in twoclinical examples. Fat-specific methods should be preferred over STIR for fat-signal suppression in breast DWI, such as SPAIR which also provides a higher sensitivity than STIR for lesion detection. One should remain aware, however, that efficient fat-signal suppression with SPAIR requires good B0 shimming to avoid ADC underestimation from residual fat contamination. The spectral adiabatic (or attenuated) inversion recovery (SPAIR) method should be preferred over short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) for fat suppression in breast DWI. Fat-signal suppression is essential for breast DWI; the SPAIR method is recommended. Short-tau inversion recovery (STIR)is not specific to fat; as a result, SNR is decreased and ADC values may be over- or underestimated. The STIR fat-suppression method must not be used after the injection of gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Stability of Radiomic Features against Variations in Lesion Segmentations Computed on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps of Breast Lesions.

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) combined with radiomics can aid in the differentiation of breast lesions. Segmentation characteristics, however, might influence radiomic features. To evaluate feature stability, we implemented a standardized pipeline featuring shifts and shape variations of the underlying segmentations. A total of 103 patients were retrospectively included in this IRB-approved study after multiparametric diagnostic breast 3T MRI with a spin-echo diffusion-weighted sequence with echoplanar readout (b-values: 50, 750 and 1500 s/mm2). Lesion segmentations underwent shifts and shape variations, with >100 radiomic features extracted from apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for each variation. These features were then compared and ranked based on their stability, measured by the Overall Concordance Correlation Coefficient (OCCC) and Dynamic Range (DR). Results showed variation in feature robustness to segmentation changes. The most stable features, excluding shape-related features, were FO (Mean, Median, RootMeanSquared), GLDM (DependenceNonUniformity), GLRLM (RunLengthNonUniformity), and GLSZM (SizeZoneNonUniformity), which all had OCCC and DR > 0.95 for both shifting and resizing the segmentation. Perimeter, MajorAxisLength, MaximumDiameter, PixelSurface, MeshSurface, and MinorAxisLength were the most stable features in the Shape category with OCCC and DR > 0.95 for resizing. Considering the variability in radiomic feature stability against segmentation variations is relevant when interpreting radiomic analysis of breast DWI data.

Effect of Phase Encoding Direction on Image Quality in Single-Shot EPI Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Breast.

In breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), distortion and physiologic artifacts affect clinical interpretation. Image quality can be optimized by addressing the effect of phase encoding (PE) direction on these artifacts. To compare distortion artifacts in breast DWI acquired with different PE directions and polarities, and to discuss their clinical implications. Prospective. Eleven healthy volunteers (median age: 47 years old; range: 22-74 years old) and a breast phantom. Single-shot echo planar DWI and three-dimensional fast gradient echo sequences at 3 T. All DWI data were acquired with left-right, right-left, posterior-anterior, and anterior-posterior PE directions. In phantom data, displacement magnitude was evaluated by comparing the location of landmarks in anatomical and DWI images. Three breast radiologists (5, 17, and 23 years of experience) assessed the presence or absence of physiologic artifacts in volunteers' DWI datasets and indicated their PE-direction preference. Analysis of variance with post-hoc tests were used to assess differences in displacement magnitude across DWI datasets and observers. A binomial test and a chi-squared test were used to evaluateif each in vivo DWI dataset had an equal probability (25%) of being preferred by radiologists. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated using Gwet's AC1 agreement coefficient. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. In the phantom study, median displacement was the significantly largest in posterior-anterior data. While the displacement in the anterior-posterior and left-right data were equivalent (P = 0.545). In the in vivo data, there were no physiological artifacts observed in any dataset, regardless of PE direction. In the reader study, there was a significant preference for the posterior-anterior datasets which were selected 94% of the time. There was good agreement between readers (0.936). This study showed the impact of PE direction on distortion artifacts in breast DWI. In healthy volunteers, the posterior-to-anterior PE direction was preferred by readers. 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Accelerating acquisition of readout-segmented echo planar imaging (rs-EPI) with a simultaneous multislice (SMS) technique for diffusion-weighted (DW) breast MRI: Evaluation of image quality factors

PurposeThis study aims to compare the image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values, and scan time between readout-segmented echo planar imaging (rs-EPI) and simultaneous multislice (SMS) rs-EPI sequences. MethodsA total of 80 consecutive women who underwent breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were included, and two rs-EPI DWI sequences with and without SMS were acquired and compared. Qualitative analysis involved three radiologists independently scoring image quality and radiologist preference. For quantitative comparison, the radiologists independently measured the ADC values in patients, while SNR, CNR, and ADC values were measured on a phantom. ResultsThe acquisition time was 5:47 min for rs-EPI and 3:20 min for SMS rs-EPI. In terms of image quality, scores were similar between rs-EPI and SMS rs-EPI sequences in the pooled data set, with the exception of skin-line distinction (p = 0.001) and background noise (p < 0.001). All radiologists considered SMS rs-EPI as equal or superior to rs-EPI in more than 70 % of cases. SMS rs-EPI demonstrated significantly higher ADC values than rs-EPI by all radiologists (p ≤ 0.002). For the phantom measurement, ADC (SMS: 1.26 ± 0.68 and RS: 1.26 ± 0.68, p = 0.198), SNR (SMS: 540.6 ± 342.1 and RS: 558.8 ± 523.2, p = 0.927), and CNR (SMS: 235.5 ± 38.9 and RS: 252.8 ± 108.0, p = 0.784) values did not significantly differ between the two sequences. ConclusionSMS rs-EPI exhibited comparable image quality and similar ADC, SNR, and CNR values to rs-EPI while reducing the scan time by 42%.

Deep Learning k-Space-to-Image Reconstruction Facilitates High Spatial Resolution and Scan Time Reduction in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Breast MRI.

For time-consuming diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the breast, deep learning-based imaging acceleration appears particularly promising. To investigate a combined k-space-to-image reconstruction approach for scan time reduction and improved spatial resolution in breast DWI. Retrospective. 133 women (age 49.7 ± 12.1 years) underwent multiparametric breast MRI. 3.0T/T2 turbo spin echo, T1 3D gradient echo, DWI (800 and 1600 sec/mm2). DWI data were retrospectively processed using deep learning-based k-space-to-image reconstruction (DL-DWI) and an additional super-resolution algorithm (SRDL-DWI). In addition to signal-to-noise ratio and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) comparisons among standard, DL- and SRDL-DWI, a range of quantitative similarity (e.g., structural similarity index [SSIM]) and error metrics (e.g., normalized root mean square error [NRMSE], symmetric mean absolute percent error [SMAPE], log accuracy error [LOGAC]) was calculated to analyze structural variations. Subjective image evaluation was performed independently by three radiologists on a seven-point rating scale. Friedman's rank-based analysis of variance with Bonferroni-corrected pairwise post-hoc tests. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Both DL- and SRDL-DWI allowed for a 39% reduction in simulated scan time over standard DWI (5 vs. 3 minutes). The highest image quality ratings were assigned to SRDL-DWI with good interreader agreement (ICC 0.834; 95% confidence interval 0.818-0.848). Irrespective of b-value, both standard and DL-DWI produced superior SNR compared to SRDL-DWI. ADC values were slightly higher in SRDL-DWI (+0.5%) and DL-DWI (+3.4%) than in standard DWI. Structural similarity was excellent between DL-/SRDL-DWI and standard DWI for either b value (SSIM ≥ 0.86). Calculation of error metrics (NRMSE ≤ 0.05, SMAPE ≤ 0.02, and LOGAC ≤ 0.04) supported the assumption of low voxel-wise error. Deep learning-based k-space-to-image reconstruction reduces simulated scan time of breast DWI by 39% without influencing structural similarity. Additionally, super-resolution interpolation allows for substantial improvement of subjective image quality. 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Breast DWI Analyzed Before and After Gadolinium Contrast Administration-An Intrapatient Analysis on 1.5 T and 3.0 T.

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is gaining popularity as an addition to standard dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. Although adding diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to the standard protocol design would require increased scanning-time, implementation during the contrast-enhanced phase could offer a multiparametric MRI protocol without any additional scanning time. However, gadolinium within a region of interest (ROI) might affect assessments of DWI. This study aims to determine if acquiring DWI postcontrast, incorporated in an abbreviated MRI protocol, would statistically significantly affect lesion classification. In addition, the effect of postcontrast DWI on breast parenchyma was studied. Screening or preoperative MRIs (1.5 T/3 T) were included for this study. Diffusion-weighted imaging was acquired with single-shot spin echo-echo planar imaging before and at approximately 2 minutes after gadoterate meglumine injection. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) based on 2-dimensional ROIs of fibroglandular tissue, as well as benign and malignant lesions at 1.5 T/3.0 T, were compared with a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Diffusivity levels were compared between precontrast and postcontrast DWI with weighted κ. An overall P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. No significant changes were observed in ADC mean after contrast administration in 21 patients with 37 ROI of healthy fibroglandular tissue and in the 93 patients with 93 (malignant and benign) lesions. This effect remained after stratification on B 0 . In 18% of all lesions, a diffusion level shift was observed, with an overall weighted κ of 0.75. This study supports incorporating DWI at 2 minutes postcontrast when ADC is calculated based on b150-b800 with 15 mL 0.5 M gadoterate meglumine in an abbreviated multiparametric MRI protocol without requiring extra scan time.

Novel deep-learning-based diffusion weighted imaging sequence in 1.5 T breast MRI

PurposeThis study aimed to assess the technical feasibility, the impact on image quality, and the acquisition time (TA) of a new deep-learning-based reconstruction algorithm in diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MethodsRetrospective analysis of 55 female patients who underwent breast DWI at 1.5 T. Raw data were reconstructed using a deep-learning (DL) reconstruction algorithm on a subset of the acquired averages, therefore a reduction of TA. Clinically used standard DWI sequence (DWIStd) and the DL-reconstructed images (DWIDL) were compared. Two radiologists rated the image quality of b800 and ADC images, using a Likert-scale from 1 to 5 with 5 being considered perfect image quality. Signal intensities were measured by placing a region of interest (ROI) at the same position in both sequences. ResultsTA was reduced by 40 % in DWIDL, compared to DWIStd, DWIDL improved noise and sharpness while maintaining contrast, the level of artifacts, and diagnostic confidence. There were no differences regarding the signal intensity values of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), (p = 0.955), b50-values (p = 0.070) and b800-values (p = 0.415) comparing standard and DL-imaging. Lesion assessment showed no differences regarding the number of lesions in ADC and DWI (both p = 1.000) and regarding the lesion diameter in DWI (p = 0.961;0.972) and ADC (p = 0.961;0.972). ConclusionsThe novel deep-learning-based reconstruction algorithm significantly reduces TA in breast DWI, while improving sharpness, reducing noise, and maintaining a comparable level of image quality, artifacts, contrast, and diagnostic confidence. DWIDL does not influence the quantifiable parameters.

An Unenhanced Breast MRI Protocol Based on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: A Retrospective Single-Center Study on High-Risk Population for Breast Cancer.

This study aimed to investigate the use of contrast-free magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an innovative screening method for detecting breast cancer in high-risk asymptomatic women. Specifically, the researchers evaluated the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in this population. MR images from asymptomatic women, carriers of a germline mutation in either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene, collected in a single center from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. A radiologist with experience in breast imaging (R1) and a radiology resident (R2) independently evaluated DWI/ADC maps and, in case of doubts, T2-WI. The standard of reference was the pathological diagnosis through biopsy or surgery, or ≥1 year of clinical and radiological follow-up. Diagnostic performances were calculated for both readers with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa (κ) statistics. Out of 313 women, 145 women were included (49.5 ± 12 years), totaling 344 breast MRIs with DWI/ADC maps. The per-exam cancer prevalence was 11/344 (3.2%). The sensitivity was 8/11 (73%; 95% CI: 46-99%) for R1 and 7/11 (64%; 95% CI: 35-92%) for R2. The specificity was 301/333 (90%; 95% CI: 87-94%) for both readers. The diagnostic accuracy was 90% for both readers. R1 recalled 40/344 exams (11.6%) and R2 recalled 39/344 exams (11.3%). Inter-reader reproducibility between readers was in moderate agreement (κ = 0.43). In female carriers of a BRCA1/2 mutation, breast DWI supplemented with T2-WI allowed breast cancer detection with high sensitivity and specificity by a radiologist with extensive experience in breast imaging, which is comparable to other screening tests. The findings suggest that DWI and T2-WI have the potential to serve as a stand-alone method for unenhanced breast MRI screening in a selected population, opening up new perspectives for prospective trials.

Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility of Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Quantitative Parameters: Readout-Segmented vs. Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging.

The recommended technique for breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquisitions is not sufficiently standardized in clinical practice. To investigate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of DWI measurements, diffusion-kurtosis imaging (DKI) parameters, and image quality evaluation in breast lesions between single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI). Prospective. A total of 295 women with 209 malignant and 86 benign breast lesions. A 3-T; fat-saturated T2-weighted MR imaging (T2WI); multi-b-value DWI with both ss-EPI and rs-EPI readouts; T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusion (MD), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured for each lesion on ss-EPI and rs-EPI, respectively. Image quality was visually evaluated regarding image sharpness, geometric distortion, lesion conspicuity, visualization of anatomic structures, and overall quality. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed twice with a time interval of 2 weeks. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility wereevaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV), and Bland-Altman plots. MK, MD, and ADC quantitative parameters for breast lesions showed excellent intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility, with ICCs >0.75 and wCV values ranging from 2.51% to 7.08% for both sequences. The wCV values in both intraobserver and interobserver measurements were higher in the ss-EPI sequence (3.63%-7.08%) than that of the rs-EPI sequence (2.51%-3.62%). The wCV values differed in subgroups with different histopathological types of lesions, breast density, lesion morphology, and lesion sizes, respectively. Furthermore, rs-EPI (ICCs, 0.76-0.97; wCV values, 2.41%-6.04%) had better intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility than ss-EPI (ICCs, 0.54-0.90; wCV values, 6.18%-13.69%) with regard to image quality. Compared to the ss-EPI, the rs-EPI sequence showed higher intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility for quantitative diffusion-related parameters and image quality assessments measured in breast DWI and DKI. 2. Stage 2.

Diagnostic value of multiple b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in discriminating the malignant from benign breast lesions

ObjectiveThe conventional breast Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was subtly influenced by microcirculation owing to the insufficient selection of the b values. However, the multiparameter derived from multiple b-value exhibits more reliable image quality and maximize the diagnostic accuracy. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of stand-alone parameter or in combination with multiparameter derived from multiple b-value DWI in differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions.MethodsA total of forty-one patients diagnosed with benign breast tumor and thirty-eight patients with malignant breast tumor underwent DWI using thirteen b values and other MRI functional sequence at 3.0 T magnetic resonance. Data were accepted mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential, aquaporins (AQP) model analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of quantitative parameter or multiparametric combination. The Youden index, sensitivity and specificity were used to assess the optimal diagnostic model. T-test, logistic regression analysis, and Z-test were used. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultThe ADCavg, ADCmax, f, and α value of the malignant group were lower than the benign group, while the ADCfast value was higher instead. The ADCmin, ADCslow, DDC and ADCAQP showed no statistical significance. The combination (ADCavg-ADCfast) yielded the largest area under curve (AUC = 0.807) with sensitivity (68.42%), specificity (87.8%) and highest Youden index, indicating that multiparametric combination (ADCavg-ADCfast) was validated to be a useful model in differentiating the benign from breast malignant lesion.ConclusionThe current study based on the multiple b-value diffusion model demonstrated quantitatively multiparametric combination (ADCavg-ADCfast) exhibited the optimal diagnostic efficacy to differentiate malignant from benign breast lesions, suggesting that multiparameter would be a promising non-invasiveness to diagnose breast lesions.

A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the implementation of breast diffusion-weighted imaging in clinical practice.

ObjectivesTo perform a survey among all European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) radiologist members to gather representative data regarding the clinical use of breast DWI.MethodsAn online questionnaire was developed by two board-certified radiologists, reviewed by the EUSOBI board and committees, and finally distributed among EUSOBI active and associated (not based in Europe) radiologist members. The questionnaire included 20 questions pertaining to technical preferences (acquisition time, magnet strength, breast coils, number of b values), clinical indications, imaging evaluation, and reporting. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test of independence, and Fisher’s exact test.ResultsOf 1411 EUSOBI radiologist members, 275/1411 (19.5%) responded. Most (222/275, 81%) reported using DWI as part of their routine protocol. Common indications for DWI include lesion characterization (using an ADC threshold of 1.2–1.3 × 10−3 mm2/s) and prediction of response to chemotherapy. Members most commonly acquire two separate b values (114/217, 53%), with b value = 800 s/mm2 being the preferred value for appraisal among those acquiring more than two b values (71/171, 42%). Most did not use synthetic b values (169/217, 78%). While most mention hindered diffusion in the MRI report (161/213, 76%), only 142/217 (57%) report ADC values.ConclusionThe utilization of DWI in clinical practice among EUSOBI radiologists who responded to the survey is generally in line with international recommendations, with the main application being the differentiation of benign and malignant enhancing lesions, treatment response assessment, and prediction of response to chemotherapy. Report integration of qualitative and quantitative DWI data is not uniform.Key Points • Clinical performance of breast DWI is in good agreement with the current recommendations of the EUSOBI International Breast DWI working group. • Breast DWI applications in clinical practice include the differentiation of benign and malignant enhancing, treatment response assessment, and prediction of response to chemotherapy. • Report integration of DWI results is not uniform. Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08833-0.

Effect of Inter-Reader Variability on Diffusion-Weighted MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements and Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response for Breast Cancer.

This study evaluated the inter-reader agreement of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements performed on breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for assessing treatment response in a multi-center clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer. DWIs from 103 breast cancer patients (mean age: 46 ± 11 years) acquired at baseline and after 3 weeks of treatment were evaluated independently by two readers. Three types of tumor regions of interests (ROIs) were delineated: multiple-slice restricted, single-slice restricted and single-slice tumor ROIs. Compared to tumor ROIs, restricted ROIs were limited to low ADC areas of enhancing tumor only. We found excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ranged from 0.94 to 0.98) for mean ADC. Higher ICCs were observed in multiple-slice restricted ROIs (range: 0.97 to 0.98) than in other two ROI types (both in the range of 0.94 to 0.98). Among the three ROI types, the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were observed for mean ADC of multiple-slice restricted ROIs (0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52–0.79 and 0.67, 95% CI: 0.53–0.81 for Reader 1 and Reader 2, respectively). In conclusion, mean ADC values of multiple-slice restricted ROI showed excellent agreement and similar predictive performance for pathologic complete response between the two readers.

Accelerated Breast Diffusion-weighted Imaging Using Multiband Sensitivity Encoding with the CAIPIRINHA Method: Clinical Experience at 3 T

Purpose To examine the clinical value of multiband (MB) sensitivity encoding (SENSE)-accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for breast imaging by performing quantitative and qualitative comparisons with conventional diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging, or conventional DWI (cDWI). Materials and Methods In this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03607552), women with breast cancer were recruited from July 2018 to July 2019 to undergo additional MB SENSE DWI during clinical 3-T breast MRI examinations. The cDWI and MB SENSE DWI acquisitions were assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Regions of interest were defined for tumorous and normal tissue, and the tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal index (SI) were calculated for both DWI methods. Three readers independently reviewed the two acquisitions side by side and provided relative image quality scores. Tumor ADC, CNR, and SI measures were compared between cDWI and MB SENSE DWI acquisitions by using a paired t test, and reader preferences were evaluated by using the sign test. Results The study included 38 women (median age, 48 years; range, 28-83 years). Overall agreement was good between cDWI and MB SENSE DWI tumor ADC measures (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.87 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.94]), and no differences were evident in the ADC (median, 0.93 × 10-3 mm2/sec vs 0.87 ×10-3 mm2/sec; P = .50), CNR (2.2 vs 2.3; P = .17), or SI (9.2 vs 9.2; P = .23) measurements. The image quality of cDWI and MB SENSE DWI acquisitions were considered equal for 51% of images (58 of 114), whereas MB SENSE DWI was preferred more often than cDWI (37% [42 of 114] vs 12% [14 of 114]; P < .001). The preference for MB SENSE DWI was most often attributed to better fat suppression. Conclusion MB SENSE can be used to accelerate breast DWI acquisition times without compromising the image quality or the fidelity of quantitative ADC measurements. Keywords: MR-Diffusion-weighted Imaging, Breast, Comparative Studies, Technology Assessment Clinical trial registration no. NCT03607552 © RSNA, 2022.

Clinical usefulness of the fast protocol of breast diffusion-weighted imaging using 3T magnetic resonance imaging with a 16-channel breast coil

We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of a fast protocol of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with one excitation using 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a 16-channel breast coil. We analyzed 30 lesions from 27 women between February 2020 and June 2020. The visibility score (from 1 = extremely poor to 5 = excellent) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value between one and four excitations were evaluated by two readers. The image acquisition time was 40 s for one excitation and 1 min 52 s for four excitations. The visibility scores were 4.630 ± 0.718 and 4.267 ± 1.015 for one excitation and 4.730 ± 0.691 and 4.200 ± 1.000 for four excitations by the two readers. There was no significant difference in the visibility (P = 0.184 and P = 0.423), mean ADC value (P = 0.918 and P = 0.417), and minimum ADC value (P = 0.936 and P = 0.443) between one and four excitations by the two readers. Despite the short acquisition time, the visibility score and ADC values of one-excitation DWI were comparable to that with four excitations. Our fast DWI protocol could provide reproducible visibility and ADC value, potentially helping radiologists to efficiently diagnose patients.

Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making.

ObjectivesIn breast diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) protocol standardization, it is recently shown that no breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) method outperformed the others. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of three fixed-size breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) methods based on the reproducibility, accuracy and time-measurement in comparison to the largest oval and manual delineation in breast diffusion weighted imaging data.MethodsThis study is performed with a consecutive dataset of 116 breast lesions (98 malignant) of at least 1.0 cm, scanned in accordance with the EUSOBI breast DWI working group recommendations. Reproducibility of the maximum size manual (BTTS1) and of the maximal size round/oval (BTTS2) methods were compared with three smaller fixed-size circular BTTS methods in the middle of each lesion (BTTS3, 0.12 cm3 volume) and at lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (BTTS4, 0.12 cm3; BTTS5, 0.24 cm3). Mean ADC values, intraclass-correlation-coefficients (ICCs), area under the curve (AUC) and measurement times (sec) of the 5 BTTS methods were assessed by two observers.ResultsExcellent inter- and intra-observer agreement was found for any BTTS (with ICC 0.88–0.92 and 0.92–0.94, respectively). Significant difference in ADCmean between any pair of BTTS methods was shown (p = <0.001–0.009), except for BTTS2 vs. BTTS3 for observer 1 (p = 0.10). AUCs were comparable between BTTS methods, with highest AUC for BTTS2 (0.89–0.91) and lowest for BTTS4 (0.76–0.85). However, as an indicator of clinical feasibility, BTTS2-3 showed shortest measurement times (10–15 sec) compared to BTTS1, 4–5 (19–39 sec).ConclusionThe performance of fixed-size BTTS methods, as a potential tool for clinical decision making, shows equal AUC but shorter ADC measurement time compared to manual or oval whole lesion measurements. The advantage of a fixed size BTTS method is the excellent reproducibility. A central fixed breast tumor tissue volume of 0.12 cm3 is the most feasible method for use in clinical practice.

Factors Affecting Image Quality and Lesion Evaluability in Breast Diffusion-weighted MRI: Observations from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Multisite Trial (A6702).

The A6702 multisite trial confirmed that apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measures can improve breast MRI accuracy and reduce unnecessary biopsies, but also found that technical issues rendered many lesions non-evaluable on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). This secondary analysis investigated factors affecting lesion evaluability and impact on diagnostic performance. The A6702 protocol was IRB-approved at 10 institutions; participants provided informed consent. In total, 103 women with 142 MRI-detected breast lesions (BI-RADS assessment category 3, 4, or 5) completed the study. DWI was acquired at 1.5T and 3T using a four b-value, echo-planar imaging sequence. Scans were reviewed for multiple quality factors (artifacts, signal-to-noise, misregistration, and fat suppression); lesions were considered non-evaluable if there was low confidence in ADC measurement. Associations of lesion evaluability with imaging and lesion characteristics were determined. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were compared using bootstrapping. Thirty percent (42/142) of lesions were non-evaluable on DWI; 23% (32/142) with image quality issues, 7% (10/142) with conspicuity and/or localization issues. Misregistration was the only factor associated with non-evaluability (P = 0.001). Smaller (≤10 mm) lesions were more commonly non-evaluable than larger lesions (p <0.03), though not significant after multiplicity correction. The AUC for differentiating benign and malignant lesions increased after excluding non-evaluable lesions, from 0.61 (95% CI: 0.50-0.71) to 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.84). Image quality remains a technical challenge in breast DWI, particularly for smaller lesions. Protocol optimization and advanced acquisition and post-processing techniques would help to improve clinical utility.

RUN-UP: Accelerated multishot diffusion-weighted MRI reconstruction using an unrolled network with U-Net as priors.

To accelerate and improve multishot diffusion-weighted MRI reconstruction using deep learning. An unrolled pipeline containing recurrences of model-based gradient updates and neural networks was introduced for accelerating multishot DWI reconstruction with shot-to-shot phase correction. The network was trained to predict results of jointly reconstructed multidirection data using single-direction data as input. In vivo brain and breast experiments were performed for evaluation. The proposed method achieves a reconstruction time of 0.1 second per image, over 100-fold faster than a shot locally low-rank reconstruction. The resultant image quality is comparable to the target from the joint reconstruction with a peak signal-to-noise ratio of 35.3 dB, a normalized root-mean-square error of 0.0177, and a structural similarity index of 0.944. The proposed method also improves upon the locally low-rank reconstruction (2.9 dB higher peak signal-to-noise ratio, 29% lower normalized root-mean-square error, and 0.037 higher structural similarity index). With training data from the brain, this method also generalizes well to breast diffusion-weighted imaging, and fine-tuning further reduces aliasing artifacts. A proposed data-driven approach enables almost real-time reconstruction with improved image quality, which improves the feasibility of multishot DWI in a wide range of clinical and neuroscientific studies.

Diffusion MRI of the breast: Current status and future directions.

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is increasingly being incorporated into routine breast MRI protocols in many institutions worldwide, and there are abundant breast DWI indications ranging from lesion detection and distinguishing malignant from benign tumors to assessing prognostic biomarkers of breast cancer and predicting treatment response. DWI has the potential to serve as a noncontrast MR screening method. Beyond apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping, which is a commonly used quantitative DWI measure, advanced DWI models such as intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), non-Gaussian diffusion MRI, and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) are extensively exploited in this field, allowing the characterization of tissue perfusion and architecture and improving diagnostic accuracy without the use of contrast agents. This review will give a summary of the clinical literature along with future directions. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:70-90.

Automated deep learning method for whole‐breast segmentation in diffusion‐weighted breast MRI

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MRI plays an increasingly important role in diagnostic applications and developing imaging biomarkers. Automated whole-breast segmentation is an important yet challenging step for quantitative breast imaging analysis. While methods have been developed on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, automatic whole-breast segmentation in breast DWI MRI is still underdeveloped. To develop a deep/transfer learning-based segmentation approach for DWI MRI scans and conduct an extensive study assessment on four imaging datasets from both internal and external sources. Retrospective. In all, 98 patients (144 MRI scans; 11,035 slices) of four different breast MRI datasets from two different institutions. 1.5T scanners with DCE sequence (Dataset 1 and Dataset 2) and DWI sequence. A 3.0T scanner with one external DWI sequence. Deep learning models (UNet and SegNet) and transfer learning were used as segmentation approaches. The main DCE Dataset (4,251 2D slices from 39 patients) was used for pre-training and internal validation, and an unseen DCE Dataset (431 2D slices from 20 patients) was used as an independent test dataset for evaluating the pre-trained DCE models. The main DWI Dataset (6,343 2D slices from 75 MRI scans of 29 patients) was used for transfer learning and internal validation, and an unseen DWI Dataset (10 2D slices from 10 patients) was used for independent evaluation to the fine-tuned models for DWI segmentation. Manual segmentations by three radiologists (>10-year experience) were used to establish the ground truth for assessment. The segmentation performance was measured using the Dice Coefficient (DC) for the agreement between manual expert radiologist's segmentation and algorithm-generated segmentation. The mean value and standard deviation of the DCs were calculated to compare segmentation results from different deep learning models. For the segmentation on the DCE MRI, the average DC of the UNet was 0.92 (cross-validation on the main DCE dataset) and 0.87 (external evaluation on the unseen DCE dataset), both higher than the performance of the SegNet. When segmenting the DWI images by the fine-tuned models, the average DC of the UNet was 0.85 (cross-validation on the main DWI dataset) and 0.72 (external evaluation on the unseen DWI dataset), both outperforming the SegNet on the same datasets. The internal and independent tests show that the deep/transfer learning models can achieve promising segmentation effects validated on DWI data from different institutions and scanner types. Our proposed approach may provide an automated toolkit to help computer-aided quantitative analyses of breast DWI images. 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:635-643.

Diffusion-weighted Imaging of Invasive Breast Cancer: Relationship to Distant Metastasis-free Survival.

Background Combined minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and ADC difference value may improve the diagnostic performance of breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) compared with mean ADC. Purpose To investigate whether ADC parameters at DWI are associated with distant metastasis-free survival in women with invasive breast cancer. Materials and Methods Between 2013 and 2014, 258 consecutive women (mean age ± standard deviation, 50.9 years ± 10.5; age range, 23-85 years) with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer who underwent preoperative MRI with DWI were evaluated. All DWI examinations were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists blinded to clinical information. The mean, minimum, and maximum ADCs were measured by manually placing regions of interest within the lesions, and the ADC difference value (the difference between minimum and maximum ADCs) was calculated to evaluate intratumoral heterogeneity. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the associations between ADC parameters and distant metastasis-free survival after adjustment for clinical-pathologic factors. Results In 25 of the 258 women (9.7%), distant metastasis developed at a median follow-up of 51 months. The ADC difference value was higher in women with distant metastasis than in those without distant metastasis (mean, 0.743 × 10-3 mm2/sec vs 0.566 × 10-3 mm2/sec, respectively; P < .001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that a higher ADC difference value (>0.698 × 10-3 mm2/sec) (hazard ratio [HR], 4.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0, 10.0; P < .001), presence of axillary node metastasis (HR, 3.3; 95% CI: 1.2, 9.3; P = .02), and estrogen receptor negativity (HR, 2.6; 95% CI: 1.2, 5.7; P = .02) were associated with poorer distant metastasis-free survival. Conclusion A higher apparent diffusion coefficient difference value at diffusion-weighted imaging is associated with poorer distant metastasis-free survival of women with invasive breast cancer. © RSNA, 2019 See also the editorial by Taourel in this issue.