Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to compare the image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values, and scan time between readout-segmented echo planar imaging (rs-EPI) and simultaneous multislice (SMS) rs-EPI sequences. MethodsA total of 80 consecutive women who underwent breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were included, and two rs-EPI DWI sequences with and without SMS were acquired and compared. Qualitative analysis involved three radiologists independently scoring image quality and radiologist preference. For quantitative comparison, the radiologists independently measured the ADC values in patients, while SNR, CNR, and ADC values were measured on a phantom. ResultsThe acquisition time was 5:47 min for rs-EPI and 3:20 min for SMS rs-EPI. In terms of image quality, scores were similar between rs-EPI and SMS rs-EPI sequences in the pooled data set, with the exception of skin-line distinction (p = 0.001) and background noise (p < 0.001). All radiologists considered SMS rs-EPI as equal or superior to rs-EPI in more than 70 % of cases. SMS rs-EPI demonstrated significantly higher ADC values than rs-EPI by all radiologists (p ≤ 0.002). For the phantom measurement, ADC (SMS: 1.26 ± 0.68 and RS: 1.26 ± 0.68, p = 0.198), SNR (SMS: 540.6 ± 342.1 and RS: 558.8 ± 523.2, p = 0.927), and CNR (SMS: 235.5 ± 38.9 and RS: 252.8 ± 108.0, p = 0.784) values did not significantly differ between the two sequences. ConclusionSMS rs-EPI exhibited comparable image quality and similar ADC, SNR, and CNR values to rs-EPI while reducing the scan time by 42%.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.