Breast-conserving Surgery Research Articles

Future challenges in the surgical treatment of breast cancer – Oncoplastic, prophylactic procedures and reconstructive surgery

AbstractMedical knowledge is doubling faster and faster. Surgeons are highly specialized and must be trained not only in surgery, but also in imaging and oncology to meet the modern requirements of a breast center. This article describes what has changed in the surgical treatment of breast cancer over the past 20 years since the introduction of certified breast centers in Germany, and what could change in the future. Pre- and post-operative conferences have become a central component of the interdisciplinary exchange of information. Every breast-conserving operation must be precisely planned, marked and carried out in a controlled manner. Basic anatomical knowledge is not sufficient enough to perform a prophylactic mastectomy. Implant-based reconstructions change their shape and strength over time and usually lead to follow-up operations. Tissue engineering offers interesting approaches to replace the disadvantages of conventional implants in order to achieve the durability and quality similar to autologous tissue reconstructions.

Dose Deintensified 3-Day Photon, Proton, or Brachytherapy: A Nonrandomized Controlled Partial Breast Irradiation Trial

BackgroundThe optimal approach for partial breast irradiation (PBI) is unknown. We investigated a novel de-intensified 3-fraction PBI regimen for photons, protons, and brachytherapy. MethodsA multicenter nonrandomized controlled trial with primary outcome of adverse cosmesis at 3 years versus pre-PBI. Eligibility criteria were ≥ age 50 years treated with breast-conserving surgery for node-negative estrogen receptor positive (ER+) invasive breast cancer or any ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) measuring ≤ 2.5 cm. Photon and proton PBI were prescribed 21.9 Gy (RBE) and brachytherapy 21 Gy in 3 fractions. Radiotherapy technique and use of adjuvant endocrine therapy was selected at physician and patient discretion. ResultsBetween June 17, 2015 and July 13, 2017, 161 eligible patients were treated with photons (56), protons (49), or brachytherapy (56). Median patient age was 66.8 years. 126 (78.3%) had invasive breast cancer (all ER+) and 35 (21.7%) had DCIS (88.6% ER+). 54.0% of patients with invasive breast cancer and 25.8% of patients with ER+ DCIS initiated and adhered to prescribed endocrine therapy. The proportion of patients with adverse cosmesis (by trained nurse assessment) was 14.5% at baseline, 2.3% at 3 years (difference -12.2%, 95% CI (-100%, -6.4%)). Adverse cosmesis at last-follow-up, with median follow-up 5 years, was 5.7% by nurse assessment, 5.6% by panel assessment of digital photographs, and 5.2% by patient self-report. There were no observed clinically meaningful changes in other patient reported outcomes, and just two grade 2 or higher adverse events, both grade 2, in the brachytherapy cohort. 5-year local recurrence-free and progression-free survival were 98.0% and 95.5%, respectively. There were no local recurrences amongst 60 patients with invasive breast cancer and Ki67 ≤ 13.25%. ConclusionsDe-intensified 3-day PBI provided favorable disease control, tolerability, and cosmetic outcomes, meeting the pre-specified criteria for acceptability. This approach is an attractive option for small node-negative ER+ BC and DCIS patients. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02453737

Preoperative breast MR imaging influences surgical management in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma.

The purpose of the study is to assess the role of preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on the surgical management of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and to evaluate whether breast density and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) influence surgical treatment. This retrospective study was conducted on 56 patients who were diagnosed with ILC between 2014 and 2020. All patients had mammogram and ultrasound. Preoperative MRI was available in 34 patients. Age, menopausal status, breast density, BPE, multifocality/multicentricity and surgical treatment were collected. Mean pathological tumour size was 36.4 mm (range 5-140 mm). Dense breasts had larger tumours compared to non-dense breasts (P = 0.072). Of the 34 patients with MRI, 6 opted for mastectomy. Of the remaining 28 cases, MRI findings upgraded surgery to mastectomy in 54% (15/28) because mammogram/ultrasound underestimated tumour extent in 25% (7/28), or multifocal/multicentric disease was identified in 29% (8/28). Tumour size was underestimated by MRI in 7% (2/28). In the non-MRI subgroup, 64% (14/22) of patients underwent breast-conserving surgery, but 29% of them (4/14) required a second-stage mastectomy due to extensive margin involvement. There was no difference in mastectomy rate between patients with MRI (62%) and without MRI (55%) (P = 0.061). Tumour size correlation between MRI and histopathology demonstrated an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (P < 0.001). Surgical treatment recommendation was not significantly impacted by breast density or BPE. Breast MRI improves surgical management of patients with ILC in providing additional diagnostic information often missed with standard imaging modalities, and without increasing mastectomy rate. Surgical treatment is not impacted by breast density or BPE.

Surgical outcomes and complications: a study comparing oncoplastic surgery and lumpectomy

Surgical outcomes and complications: a study comparing oncoplastic surgery and lumpectomy

Improving quality of breast conservative surgery for lower quadrants cancer in small and medium sized breasts: Crescent technique versus J mammoplasty.

For medium/small size breast, breast conserving surgery (BCS) is usually associated to poor cosmetic results. The objective of the study is to evaluate oncological safety and cosmetic results comparing the "Crescent" and the "J" mammoplasty technique and to develop an algorithm for the treatment of breast cancer located in lower quadrants in medium/small breast. We retrospectively analysed all consecutive patients who underwent a "J" mammoplasty or a "Crescent" technique at AUSL IRCCS Reggio Emilia between 2016 and 2021. Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, the first group including 29 "Crescent" technique procedures and the second one including 29 patients who underwent the "J" mammoplasty technique. Oncological safety and surgical minor and major complications were evaluated. Aesthetic results were evaluated by two senior breast surgeons, independently, at least 6 months after radiotherapy (RT). At follow-up of 36 months, no recurrences and no major complications were observed in both groups. Minor complications were observed in two (6.9%) "J" group cases and in six (20.7%) "Crescent" ones (P<0.05). The 96.6% of "Crescent" and the 73.5% of "J" cases were judged excellent/good. One (3.4%) "Crescent" was judged fair versus six (20.7%) "J" mammoplasty. Two (6.9%) "J" cases were judged poor, requiring ipsilateral re-operation. When a favourable ratio between tumor size and breast volume is present, BCS can be performed for tumors located in the lower quadrants. Evaluating patients' anthropometric characteristics, skin involvement and tumor features is the key to select the right technique and to obtain both great cosmetic result and low rate of complications.

COMPARATIVE RADIATION DOSIMETRY OF WHOLE BREAST RADIOTHERAPY USING IMRT AND VMAT TECHNIQUES IN LEFT SIDED BREAST CANCER PATIENTS AFTER BREAST CONSERVING SURGERY

Background:The radiotherapy of left sided breast cancers is mandatory and integral part of treatment and challenging because of surrounding critical structures posing increased risk of complications. The main objective of this study was to quantify doses toorgan at risk(OARs) including left lung, heart, contralateral breast, spinal cord, and planning target volume (PTV) using different radiation techniques like Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)&amp;volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and comparison of radiation dosimetry. Methods: A prospective study of 30 patients of left sided breast cancer who had undergone Breast Conservative Surgery (BCS) and chemotherapy was done for adjuvant radiation. For every patient radiation planning was done by two different techniques IMRT and VMAT. Then the comparison of radiation dosimetry parameters was done for all the techniques including the parameters like PTV coverage, doses to OAR like heart, left lung, contralateral breast and spinal cord and head of humerus. The Homogenity Index (HI) were calculated. Result: The Mean age of the patient was 46.7 years. When comparing the doses delivered in IMRT and VMAT Technique for left sided breast cancer post breast conservation surgery there was significant difference in PTV Breast and axilla V95 Gy. It was 96.2±1.9% (IMRT) vs 94.8±1.71% (VMAT), (p=0.004). However significant sparing of Organs at Risk was seen. With ipsilateral lung dose mean V5 Gy was 77.86± 9.68% (IMRT) v/s 83.04± 9.86 % (VMAT), (p=0.0446). Also mean V30 Gy was 14.6±4.82% with IMRT vs 16.54±5.86% with VMAT, (p=0.0169). Heart mean dose was 8.8±1.49 Gy with IMRT and 10.98±3.7 Gy with VMAT, (p=0.0227). Further V30 Gy for Heart was 4.61±3.8% with IMRT and 6.72±4.0% with VMAT, (p=0.0132).No significant difference was seen with IMRT and VMAT technique for contralateral lung, contralateral breast and spinal cord. Conclusion: In treatment of patients with radiation with left breast cancer patients post BCS using IMRT and VMAT technique it is seen significant dose reduction with IMRT Technique for ipsilateral lung and Heart as compared to VMAT technique. Significant V95 coverage for PTV Breast and axilla with IMRT as compared to VMAT. Hence in our Study IMRT technique was found to be superior for better sparing of Organ at risk and better PTV coverage.

Disease-specific survival outcomes for patients after locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: observational cohort study.

Breast-conserving surgery alone, breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiation treatment, and mastectomy are guideline-concordant treatments for ductal carcinoma in situ. The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes between these treatment options. A stratified random sample of patients diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ between 2008 and 2014 was selected from 1330 sites in the USA. Data on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up were abstracted by local cancer registrars. Population-averaged marginal estimates of disease-specific survival and overall survival for breast-conserving surgery alone, breast-conserving surgery with radiation treatment, and mastectomy were obtained by combining sampling and overlap weights. A total of 18 442 women were included, with a median follow-up of 67.8 (interquartile range 46.1-93.5) months. A total of 35 women died from breast cancer, at a median age of 62 (interquartile range 50-74) years. Population-averaged 8-year rates of disease-specific survival were 99.6% or higher for all treatment groups, with no significant differences between groups (breast-conserving surgery alone versus breast-conserving surgery with radiation treatment, HR 1.19 (95% c.i. 0.29 to 4.85); and mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery with radiation treatment, HR 1.74 (95% c.i. 0.53 to 5.72). There was no difference in overall survival between the patients who underwent a mastectomy and the patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery with radiation treatment (HR 1.09 (95% c.i. 0.83 to 1.43)). Patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery alone had lower overall survival compared with the patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery with radiation treatment (HR 1.29 (95% c.i. 1.00 to 1.67)). This survival difference vanished for all but one subgroup, namely patients less than 65 years (HR 1.86 (95% c.i. 1.15 to 3.00)). There was no statistically significant difference in disease-specific survival between women operated with breast-conserving surgery alone, breast-conserving surgery with radiation treatment, or mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ. Given the low absolute risk of disease-specific mortality, these results provide confidence in offering individualized locoregional treatment without fear of compromising survival.

Increasing opportunities for breast-conserving therapy in multiple ipsilateral breast cancer: Dutch nationwide study.

An increasing number of breast cancer patients undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS), but multiple ipsilateral breast cancer (MIBC) is still considered a relative contraindication for breast conservation. This study provides an update on trends in the surgical management for MIBC over a 10-year period. Nationwide data from the Netherlands Cancer Registration of all patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 2011 and 2021 were analysed. The primary outcomes of this study were the incidence of MIBC and the trend in breast surgery type among patients between 2011 and 2021. Secondary outcomes were the positive resection margin rates in patients treated with BCS, the proportion of patients requiring re-excision and overall survival. In total, 114 433 patients (83%) with unifocal breast cancer and 23 932 patients (17%) with MIBC were identified. The incidence of MIBC was stable (17%) over the years. Overall BCS rates, both primary and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, increased in MIBC from 29% in 2011 to 41% in 2021. Re-excision was performed in 1348 patients (n = 8455, 16%). The 5-year OS estimate for patients with MIBC treated with BCS was 93%. The pathological complete response (pCR) in MIBC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by mastectomy was 23%. The breast conservation rate in MIBC has increased over the last decade. In addition, 23% of MIBC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by mastectomy achieved a pCR. This suggests increasing opportunities for even more BCS in MIBC.

Single preoperative radiation therapy with delayed surgery for low-risk breast cancer: Oncologic outcome, toxicity and cosmesis of the SPORT-DS phase I trial

BackgroundA novel approach using single-fraction preoperative partial breast irradiation (PBI) for low-risk breast cancer is under study. We sought to investigate the rate of pathologic response (pR), toxicities and cosmetic results related to this new treatment strategy. MethodsWomen of 65 years or older with stage I unifocal luminal A breast cancer were eligible for inclusion in this phase I prospective trial. Patients received a single 20 Gy dose of PBI followed by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) 3 months later. The primary endpoint was the pR rate, and the secondary endpoints were radiation therapy-related toxicity and cosmetic results. ResultsThirteen patients were treated, with a median age of 71. Eleven patients (84.6 %) had pR with a median residual cellularity of 1 % (range: 0–10 %). At median follow-up of 48.5 months, no recurrences or cancer-related deaths were recorded. Acute radiation therapy-related toxicity were limited to grade 1 dermatitis and breast pain. At the 1-year follow-up, there were one grade 2 fat necrosis and two grade 3 toxicities (wound infection and hematoma). Only grade 1 toxicities remained at 2 years, but one grade 2 toxicity (fibrosis/induration) developed by the 3-year follow-up. Three-year patient-reported cosmetic outcomes were good or excellent in 60 % of patients. ConclusionsSingle-fraction preoperative PBI preceding BCS for low-risk breast cancer is feasible, relatively well tolerated and leads to a high level of pR. The 3-month interval after PBI seems to place surgery in a post-radiation inflammatory phase. Further delay between PBI and surgery could improve pR and cosmetic outcome. NCT03917498.

245: Fibrosis and cosmetic outcome after breast conserving therapy with or without oncoplastic surgery

245: Fibrosis and cosmetic outcome after breast conserving therapy with or without oncoplastic surgery

Comparing long-term prognosis following different surgical methods in patients with early stage breast cancer and obesity: a retrospective cohort study in China

ObjectiveBreast-conserving therapy (BCT) includes breast-conserving surgery (BCS) combined with radiation therapy (RT). RT plays a crucial role in improving the prognosis of patients who undergo BCS. However, obesity is a...

Single pre-operative radiation therapy (SPORT-CK) trial for low-risk breast cancer: Early results of a phase 2 study

Background and purposePreoperative partial breast irradiation (PBI) is a novel technique that can be used in patients with early-stage breast cancer with the goal of limiting the irradiated breast volume, toxicity and number of fractions. The aim of this trial is to assess the toxicity, surgical, oncologic and cosmetic outcomes of preoperative PBI. Materials and MethodsIn this single-arm phase II trial, we enrolled women ≥ 60 years, with unifocal low-risk breast invasive ductal carcinoma (cT1N0, grade 1–2, ER+, Her2-). Patients were treated with a single fraction of 20 Gy of preoperative PBI using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Patients then underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) +/- sentinel lymph node biopsy within 72 h of radiation. Primary outcomes were rate of surgical complications and early toxicity. Secondary outcomes were cosmesis at 12 months, chronic toxicity and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. ResultsTwenty-five patients were recruited with a median age of 67 years, and a median follow-up of 60 months. Sentinel biopsy was positive in 1 out of 24 patients (4 %). Two patients received adjuvant RT for close margins or positive lymph nodes. Within the first 90 days, none of the patients had surgical complications; almost all had grade 0 to 1 acute and late RTOG skin toxicity. The cosmetic outcome was rated between good and excellent in all cases by physicians and patients, except for one patient who self-rated her cosmesis as fair as of the third year. There were no recurrences. ConclusionPreoperative single-fraction PBI is a safe and feasible treatment for elderly patients with low-risk early-stage breast cancer, with no surgical complications, very low rates of acute and late radiation toxicity, and excellent cosmetic outcomes. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare preoperative to adjuvant PBI in this patient population.

Surgical Management and Its Impact on Adjuvant Treatment in Recurrent Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Breast cancer (BC) recurrence, defined as the reappearance of cancer in the ipsilateral breast after primary treatment, poses significant challenges in clinical management. Despite advances in treatment, recurrence rates persist, ranging from 0.6 to 1.5% annually, reaching 10-15% at 20 years. This study aims to analyze the surgical and oncological characteristics of patients with BC recurrence. Methods: This retrospective study includes 56 patients diagnosed with recurrent BC between October 2018 and April 2022. Data were collected from a prospectively maintained surgical database. A descriptive analysis was performed on the initial BC, and the recurrence, including surgical complications, was classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. The success rates of selective sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsies and aberrant drainages were assessed based on previous surgeries. Results: The cohort included 55 females and 1 male, with a median age of 65.3 years. The mean time to BC recurrence was 11.5 years. Among them, 26.8% underwent breast-conserving surgery, 41.1% had a mastectomy, 21.4% had a mastectomy with reconstruction, and 10.7% had an excision over a previous mastectomy. An SLN biopsy was performed in 78.6% of cases, with higher success rates in those without a previous axillary lymph node dissection (85.7% vs. 63.2%). Aberrant drainage was more frequent in patients with a previous ALND (44.4% vs. 20%). The median follow-up was 41.3 months, with 10.7% experiencing a second recurrence. Conclusions: Repeat breast-conserving surgery with re-irradiation for ipsilateral recurrence is feasible and does not significantly increase complications. SLN biopsy is valuable for restaging and tailoring adjuvant therapies, with ALND not being necessary if re-SLN biopsy shows no drainage. The management of aberrant drainage remains controversial.

Intraoperative radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) offers more convenience compared to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) following breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer. This study describes the implementation of IORT at a metropolitan academic cancer center. Demographics, tumor characteristics, margin status, adjunct EBRT, and cosmetic results were retrospectively analyzed in patients undergoing BCS with IORT. IORT consists of 20 gray delivered to the partial mastectomy cavity. From 2015 to 2020, 171 patients (65.5% African American) were included. Histologically, 104 (60.8%) patients had invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), while 67 (39%) patients had DCIS only. Seventeen (15.9%) patients with IDC and 12 (8.6%) patients with DCIS had positive margins. There were 15 ipsilateral breast recurrences (8.8%) and three patients (20%) developed systemic disease. Twenty-five patients (14.6%) underwent adjuvant EBRT. The local recurrence-free survival at 60 months from date of IORT was 89.4% (95% CI 82.7%-93.6%). For overall survival (OS), 168 (98.2%) patients were alive at a median follow-up of 51.4 months, and three total deaths were recorded. IORT is a highly desirable and convenient alternative to EBRT for early-stage breast cancer especially for patients with poor compliance. IORT has an acceptable ipsilateral recurrence while not precluding adjunct EBRT based upon the final pathologic report.

Sequential Moderate Hypofractionated Boost in Breast Cancer Patients: A Monoinstitutional Analysis of Late Side Effects.

In breast cancer (BC) patients who have received breast-conserving surgery, moderate hypofractionation is standard of care for whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI). On the other hand, the fractionation schedule for the boost is less well defined. A previous prospective study of our group aimed at evaluating acute and late cutaneous and subcutaneous side effects related to a sequential hypofractionated boost (HB) in patients who had received HF-WBI. The present study aimed at evaluating late side effects at a longer follow-up. From 2014 to 2015, 219 BC patients received moderate HF-WBI (42.4 Gy in 16 fractions) at the Radiation Oncology Section of the University of Perugia. Patients with negative prognostic factors received a HB (2.65 Gy for 4 or 5 fractions). Late side effects were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Univariate and multivariate analyses estimated predictive factors for late toxicity. Median follow-up was 8.6 years (range=6.7-9.6). One hundred and sixty-five patients were evaluable in the present analysis; HB was administered to 47.3% of them. Late cutaneous and subcutaneous side effects occurred in 26/165 patients (15.8%); and all were G1. In univariate analysis ≥10 excised lymph nodes and HB administration emerged as risk factors for late side effects (p=0.003 and p=0.041, respectively). In multivariate analysis only ≥10 excised lymph nodes were confirmed as a risk factor for side effects (OR=3.431; 95%CI=1.209-9.737). HB after HF-WBI was safe and well-tolerated, even at a long-term follow-up; consequently, it can be used in routine practice.

The Brussels Breast Surgery Fellowship | A Three-Month Experience in Advancing Skills in Breast Surgery.

The Brussels Breast Surgery Fellowship at Brussels University Hospital offers a unique 3-month clinical immersion in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. Under the guidance of fellowship director Prof. Moustapha Hamdi and his esteemed colleagues, the fellow is exposed to a high volume and wide breadth of cases spanning autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction, oncoplastic surgery, breast reduction and mastopexy, implant augmentation, revision breast surgery, and fat grafting. The multidisciplinary team approach, involving close collaboration with breast surgeons, provides valuable experience in oncoplastic planning and execution. In addition to time in the operating theater, the fellow gains knowledge through outpatient clinics, didactic teaching sessions, and clinical research opportunities leveraging the department's extensive prospective database. As the 2023 fellowship awardee, I had the privilege of learning directly from Prof. Dr. Moustapha Hamdi and participating in over 130 cases across the reconstructive and aesthetic spectrum. Unique features of the fellowship included exposure to lymphedema surgery utilizing the Symani robotic system, advanced techniques like the internal bra, volume distribution mastopexies, observation of private aesthetic clinic cases, and optional participation in academic workshops. This fellowship represents an outstanding opportunity to refine one's skills in breast surgery and microsurgery while experiencing the rich culture of Belgium.

Overtreatment and Undertreatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Older Women: Evaluating the POWER Trial

IntroductionRadiation therapy (RT) omission is acceptable in older women with early-stage estrogen receptor + breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). However, RT rates in this population remain high, causing concern for overtreatment. Conversely, patients who omit RT and do not complete a course of AET are at risk of undertreatment. In the Pre-Operative Window of Endocrine Therapy to Inform Radiation Therapy Decisions (POWER) trial, participants receive 90 days of preoperative endocrine therapy to assess tolerance before deciding about RT. This study aimed to determine the rates of undertreatment and overtreatment institutionally and among POWER trial participants. MethodsData were retrospectively collected from medical records of women aged ≥ 65 years diagnosed with invasive, estrogen receptor +/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- breast cancer, ≤ 3 cm, who had BCS between 2012 and 2022. Patients were categorized as undertreated (BCS alone), overtreated (BCS + RT + AET), or appropriately treated (BCS + RT or BCS + AET). ResultsThe cohort included 478 patients, of whom 62 (12.97%) were undertreated, 202 (42.26%) were overtreated, and 214 (44.77%) were appropriately treated. Appropriately treated patients were more likely to be aged 70-79 years (P < 0.0001) and have high health literacy (P = 0.0003). Of the 37 patients (7.71%) in the POWER trial, more were appropriately treated than patients not in the POWER trial (81.1% versus 44.8%) (P < 0.0001). ConclusionsDespite long-standing guideline changes, RT utilization remains high. This study highlights how a novel patient-centered approach to guide adjuvant therapy decisions may increase the number of appropriately treated patients.

Risk Factors for Positive Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer-Retrospective Analysis.

The primary objective of this study was to identify preoperative factors that could be associated with positive resection margins. We also tried to analyze the local recurrence and overall survival in patients who received conservative treatment for early-stage breast cancer and correlate these parameters with preoperative factors. A retrospective examination was conducted on the medical records and pathological reports of 143 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer in our department from 2009 to 2017. Postoperative outcomes were assessed through phone contact and statistical analyses, including GraphPad Prism, and Fisher's exact test, the Chi-square test, and the log-rank test were employed. The results revealed positive resection margins in 7.69% (11 cases) of the 143 patients, with an overall mortality rate of 16.66% for those with positive margins and 6.59% for those with negative margins. Statistical analysis indicated no significant differences in the overall (p = 0.5) or specific (p = 0.53) survival between the positive and negative margin groups. The positive margins were significantly associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.0001) and the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (p = 0.01). Among the analyzed factors, two out of sixteen were significantly linked to positive resection margins in BCS, emphasizing their importance in surgical management planning for early-stage breast cancer.

Escalation and De-Escalation of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Early Breast Cancer: Strategies for Risk-Adapted Optimization.

Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) is recommended after breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy (with risk factors). Consideration of pros and cons, including potential side effects, demands the optimization of adjuvant RT and a risk-adapted approach. There is clear de-escalation in fractionation-hypofractionation should be considered standard. For selected low-risk situations, PBI only or even the omission of RT might be appropriate. In contrast, tendencies toward escalating RT are obvious. Preoperative RT seems attractive for patients in whom breast reconstruction is planned or for defining the tumor location more precisely with the potential of giving ablative doses. Dose escalation by a (simultaneous integrated) boost or the combination with new compounds/systemic treatments may increase antitumor efficacy but also toxicity. Despite low evidence, RT for oligometastatic disease is becoming increasingly popular. The omission of axillary dissection in node-positive disease led to an escalation of regional RT. Studies are ongoing to test if any axillary treatment can be omitted and which oligometastatic patients do really benefit from RT. Besides technical improvements, the incorporation of molecular risk profiles and also the response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy have the potential to optimize the decision-making concerning if and how local and/or regional RT should be administered.

Radiofrequency as a method of localizing impalpable breast lesions

BackgroundThe incidence of early stage breast cancer has risen as a result of increased detection of non-palpable tumors through the implementation of screening programs and greater public awareness. Performing breast-conserving surgery can be challenging due to the need for accurate localization of non-palpable breast lesions, particularly given the logistical difficulties associated with wire localization. After implementing a new technique for localizing non-palpable breast lesions (LOCalizerTM Radiofrequency identification TAG-Hologic®), a radiofrequency identification tag localization device manufactured by Hologic, Inc. in Marlborough, MA, was launched in 2017, our objective was to investigate its impact on surgical outcomes, whether there was an increase in re-excision rates for positive margins and whether the attainment of clear margins was dependent on the exact positioning of the RFID device. MethodA single-center single-arm interventional study, data were gathered both in a forward-looking manner for 1 year (prospectively) and by looking back at past records for 1 year (retrospectively) for a total period of two years. Individuals who were diagnosed with non-palpable breast lesions, as confirmed by histological analysis, or invasive breast cancer and who were scheduled to undergo breast-conserving surgery were eligible for inclusion in the study. The RFID (Radiofrequency Identification) method was used to localize the lesions prior to surgery. Either with a mammogram or ultrasound scan position of the Tag was recorded, including the distance of the lesion from the center of the lesion and the lesion depth from the skin in millimeters. The rate of re-excision was documented and examined in relation to the parameters mentioned above. ResultsTwo hundred and twenty RFID Tags were inserted in two hundred and seventeen (three patient had bilateral tags insertion), patients aged between 30 and 85 had a localizer Tag inserted between Oct 2020 and Oct 2022. Three patients had non-palpable breast lesions in both breasts. Fourteen were inserted under stereotactic guidance and two hundred and six under ultrasound guidance. Ten patients subsequently had wire insertion also due to Tag position. Of 210 procedures, RFIF Tags within the lesion was seen in hundred and sixty patients (76.19 %). An additional 50 procedures were performed using the RFID Tag system, which were not directly related to the lesion but were deemed appropriate to proceed with.Out of a total of 220 procedures, positive margins were observed in 38 cases (17.27 %). Among these cases, eleven (28.94 %) involved the use of the RFID Tag system, not within the lesion but adjacent to it (within 15 mm surrounding the lesion). ConclusionRFID is a good alternative to wire localization of non-palpable breast lesions. Re-excision rates are higher in patients with Tag outside the lesion compared to those with Tag within the lesion.