Breast Cancer Risk Management Research Articles

Breast Cancer Risk and Management in the Endocrine Clinic: A Comprehensive Review.

This review seeks to provide endocrine clinicians with a comprehensive analysis of breast cancer risk, diagnostic modalities and management strategies in women with endocrine disorders, with particular emphasis on the influence of metabolic factors such as diabetes and obesity, and the role of Menopausal Hormone Therapy (MHT). The review examines a spectrum of endocrine disorders commonly encountered in clinical practice, including Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Types 1 (MEN1), 2 (MEN2) and 4 (MEN4), Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL), Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma (PPGL), Acromegaly, Hyperprolactinaemia, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH), Turner Syndrome, alongside metabolic conditions such as diabetes and obesity and the effects of MHT. The review critically appraises each disorder's association with breast cancer risk, screening implications and therapeutic management. This analysis focuses on women with the aforementioned endocrine and metabolic disorders, assessing their specific breast cancer risk profiles, informed by the latest clinical evidence and molecular insights. The review comprehensively evaluates current evidence-based approaches to screening, diagnostic accuracy and treatment in this patient cohort. Emphasis is placed on the metabolic derangements, hormonal influences and genetic predispositions that modulate breast cancer risk, providing disorder-specific recommendations for individualised care. The findings indicate a significantly elevated breast cancer risk in patients with MEN1, necessitating early initiation of MRI screening by age 40. In MEN2, emerging evidence suggests that combining RET inhibitors with endocrine therapy may yield clinical benefits, although further research is needed to validate this approach. The breast cancer risk associated with MEN4 and VHL syndromes, while documented, remains less well-characterised, requiring further investigation. Diabetes and obesity are confirmed as major modifiable risk factors, particularly in postmenopausal women, where hyperinsulinemia and metabolic dysfunction contribute to increased incidence and poorer outcomes, notably in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The role of MHT, particularly combined oestrogen-progestogen therapy, is strongly associated with increased breast cancer risk, particularly for hormone receptor-positive malignancies, necessitating cautious use and personalised treatment planning. In contrast, oestrogen-only MHT appears to confer a reduced risk in women post-hysterectomy. For patients with PCOS, CAH and Turner Syndrome, while definitive evidence of elevated breast cancer risk is lacking, individualised screening strategies and careful hormone therapy management remain essential due to the complex interplay of hormonal and metabolic factors. The review highlights the need for personalised breast cancer screening and management protocols in women with endocrine and metabolic disorders. For high-risk groups such as MEN1 patients, early initiation of MRI screening is warranted. In women with diabetes and obesity, targeted interventions addressing hyperinsulinemia and metabolic dysfunction are critical to mitigating their increased cancer risk. The association between MHT and breast cancer underscores the importance of individualised risk stratification in hormone therapy administration, particularly in women with predisposing genetic or endocrine conditions. Enhanced surveillance tailored to the unique risk profiles of endocrine disorder patients will facilitate early detection and improve clinical outcomes. However, further large-scale studies are necessary to refine these associations and develop robust, evidence-based guidelines.

Evaluating the performance of the BOADICEA model in predicting 10-year breast cancer risks in UK Biobank.

The BOADICEA model predicts breast cancer risk using cancer family history, epidemiological and genetic data. We evaluated its validity in a large prospective cohort. We assessed model calibration, discrimination and risk classification ability in 217,885 women (6,838 incident breast cancers) aged 40-70 years old of self-reported White ethnicity with no previous cancer from the UK Biobank. Age-specific risk classification was assessed using relative risk (RR) thresholds equivalent to the absolute lifetime risk categories of < 17%, 17-30% and ≥30%, recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. We predicted 10-year risks using BOADICEA v.6 considering cancer family history, questionnaire-based risk factors, a 313-SNP polygenic score and pathogenic variants. Mammographic density data were not available. The PRS was the most discriminative risk factor (AUC=0.65). Discrimination was highest when considering all risk factors (AUC=0.66). The model was well calibrated overall (E/O=0.99, 95%CI=0.97-1.02; calibration slope=0.99, 95%CI:0.99-1.00), and in deciles of predicted risks. Discrimination was similar in women younger and older than 50 years. There was some underprediction in women under age 50 (E/O=0.89, 95%CI=0.84-0.94; calibration slope=0.96, 95%CI:0.94-0.97), which was explained by the higher breast cancer incidence in UK Biobank than the UK population incidence in this age group. The model classified 87.2%, 11.4% and 1.4% of women in RR categories <1.6, 1.6-3.1 and ≥3.1, identifying 25.6% of incident breast cancer cases in category RR ≥ 1.6. BOADICEA, implemented in CanRisk (www.canrisk.org), provides valid 10-year breast cancer risk which can facilitate risk-stratified screening and personalized breast cancer risk management.

Multiplicity of benign breast disease lesions and breast cancer risk in African American women.

The risk of developing subsequent breast cancer is higher in women diagnosed with benign breast disease (BBD) but these studies were primarily performed in non-Hispanic white populations. Still, these estimates have been used to inform breast cancer risk models that are being used clinically across all racial and ethnic groups. Given the high breast cancer mortality rates among African American (AA) women, it is critical to study BBD in this population, to ensure the risk models that include this information perform adequately. This study utilized data from AA women who underwent benign breast biopsies at a hospital served by the University Pathology Group in Detroit, Michigan, from 1998 to 2010. Patients were followed for subsequent breast cancers through the population-based Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System (MDCSS). BBD lesion scores were assigned to represent the severity or extent of benign breast lesions, with higher scores indicating a greater number of distinct lesion types. Of 3,461 eligible AA women with BBD in the cohort, 6.88% (n=238) subsequently developed breast cancer. Examined individually, six of the eleven lesions (apocrine metaplasia, ductal hyperplasia, lobular hyperplasia, intraductal papilloma, sclerosing adenosis, columnar alterations and radial scars) were significantly associated with increased risk of breast cancer after adjustment for age and year of biopsy and were further considered in multiple lesion models. For every different type of benign breast lesion, subsequent risk of breast cancer increased by 25% (RR=1.25, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.42) after adjustment for age at biopsy and proliferative versus non-proliferative disease. In summary, this study affirms the increased breast cancer risk in AA women with BBD, particularly in those with multiple lesions. These findings have implications for the management of breast cancer risk in millions of women affected by BBD, a high risk group that could benefit from personalized surveillance and risk reduction strategies.

Cost-Effectiveness of Gene-Specific Prevention Strategies for Ovarian and Breast Cancer

Pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 cancer susceptibility genes (CSGs) confer an increased ovarian cancer (OC) risk, with BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D PVs also conferring an elevated breast cancer (BC) risk. Risk-reducing surgery, medical prevention, and BC surveillance offer the opportunity to prevent cancers and deaths, but their cost-effectiveness for individual CSGs remains poorly addressed. To estimate the cost-effectiveness of prevention strategies for OC and BC among individuals carrying PVs in the previously listed CSGs. In this economic evaluation, a decision-analytic Markov model evaluated the cost-effectiveness of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and, where relevant, risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) compared with nonsurgical interventions (including BC surveillance and medical prevention for increased BC risk) from December 1, 2022, to August 31, 2023. The analysis took a UK payer perspective with a lifetime horizon. The simulated cohort consisted of women aged 30 years who carried BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, or BRIP1 PVs. Appropriate sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed. CSG-specific interventions, including RRSO at age 35 to 50 years with or without BC surveillance and medical prevention (ie, tamoxifen or anastrozole) from age 30 or 40 years, RRM at age 30 to 40 years, both RRSO and RRM, BC surveillance and medical prevention, or no intervention. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. OC and BC cases and deaths were estimated. In the simulated cohort of women aged 30 years with no cancer, undergoing both RRSO and RRM was most cost-effective for individuals carrying BRCA1 (RRM at age 30 years; RRSO at age 35 years), BRCA2 (RRM at age 35 years; RRSO at age 40 years), and PALB2 (RRM at age 40 years; RRSO at age 45 years) PVs. The corresponding ICERs were -£1942/QALY (-$2680/QALY), -£89/QALY (-$123/QALY), and £2381/QALY ($3286/QALY), respectively. RRSO at age 45 years was cost-effective for RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 PV carriers compared with nonsurgical strategies. The corresponding ICERs were £962/QALY ($1328/QALY), £771/QALY ($1064/QALY), and £2355/QALY ($3250/QALY), respectively. The most cost-effective preventive strategy per 1000 PV carriers could prevent 923 OC and BC cases and 302 deaths among those carrying BRCA1; 686 OC and BC cases and 170 deaths for BRCA2; 464 OC and BC cases and 130 deaths for PALB2; 102 OC cases and 64 deaths for RAD51C; 118 OC cases and 76 deaths for RAD51D; and 55 OC cases and 37 deaths for BRIP1. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated both RRSO and RRM were most cost-effective in 96.5%, 89.2%, and 84.8% of simulations for BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 PVs, respectively, while RRSO was cost-effective in approximately 100% of simulations for RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 PVs. In this cost-effectiveness study, RRSO with or without RRM at varying optimal ages was cost-effective compared with nonsurgical strategies for individuals who carried BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, or BRIP1 PVs. These findings support personalizing risk-reducing surgery and guideline recommendations for individual CSG-specific OC and BC risk management.

Assessment High-Risk Breast Cancer in Older Patients: A Comparative Analysis of PREDICT Scores and TAILORx Risk Categorization.

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between PREDICT tool overall survival (OS) scores and high-risk patients according to TAILORx risk categorization in elderly hormone reseptor (HR) positive human epidermal growth factor negative early breast-cancer patients. We conducted a retrospective study, extracting data from medical records of 64 patients diagnosed with breast cancer. A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who had Oncotype Dx Recurrence Scores across five medical centers between 2017 and 2022. PREDICT scores were defined as calculated 10-year OS rates via PREDICT tool. The median age of the patients was 67, with a range between 65-75 years. Low-risk patients had a slightly higher two PREDICT scores compared to high-risk patients (78% vs. 73%), (81% vs. 77%), which were statistically significant. The progesterone receptor (PR) level was significantly lower in the high-risk group (3.5% vs. 80%). A unit decrease in the PREDICT scores was associated with a 11% increase in the odds of being in the high-risk group. However, these effects weren't statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. A unit decrease in the PR level was significantly associated with increased odds (by 5% in the multivariate analysis) of being in the high-risk group. Our study underscores the importance of using a combination of tools, including the PREDICT tool, PR levels, and TAILORx risk categorization, for a comprehensive risk assessment in these patients, especially in the older population. Accurate risk assessment is crucial for tailoring the treatment and optimizing outcomes in this vulnerable population. Future studies are warranted to further validate these findings in larger cohorts and to explore additional biomarkers and genomic signatures that may aid in the risk assessment and management of breast cancer in older patients.

Breast cancer risk associated with missense variants in BRCA2.

10501 Background: Greater than 90% of missense variants in BRCA2 are classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). In addition, among the few known missense pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA2, breast cancer risk has been reported to be lower compared to pathogenic truncating variants (PTVs) (Li et al., 2022) . Herein, we aim to reclassify several missense variants in BRCA2 and investigate the associated breast cancer risk. Methods: A total of 450 BRCA2 missense variants in the C-terminal DNA binding domain (DBD) were evaluated for functional effect utilizing a previously validated homology-directed DNA double-strand repair (HDR) assay. The results of the functional evaluation along with clinical, structural, and in-silico data were applied to the rules-based ACMG/AMP criteria for variant classification to identify pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants and benign/likely benign (B/LB) variants. A pooled case-control analysis was performed comparing the frequency of reclassified P/LP missense variants among 82,372 women with breast cancer within the Ambry Genetics database as cases and 174,167 unaffected women within gnomAD, CARRIERS, and BRIDGES datasets as controls to evaluate associated breast cancer risk. Separate case-control analysis and comparisons with BRCA2 DBD PTVs, exon 11 PTVs, and known missense PV standards in ENIGMA were also performed. Results: From the 450 missense variants in the DBD, 137 (30.4%) were noted to be functionally deleterious and 313 (69.6%) were functionally neutral by the HDR assay. Incorporation of the functional and other data into an ACMG/AMP model led to the reclassification of 439 (97.6%) variants, with 131 as P/LP and 308 as B/LB variants. In a pooled case-control analysis, reclassified BRCA2 missense P/LP variants were associated with clinically significant increased risks of breast cancer (Odds Ratio (OR):5.6, 95%CI:3.9–8.0), whereas B/LB missense variants were not (OR:1.1, 95%CI:1.1–1.2). Similarly elevated risks of breast cancer were observed for BRCA2 PTVs in the DBD (OR:6.8, 95%CI:5.1–9.0) and missense PV standards in ENIGMA (OR:7.8, 95%CI:4.1–14.7). However, PTVs in exon 11 of BRCA2 were associated with a lower risk of breast cancer (OR:4.4, 95%CI:3.8–4.9) compared to PTVs in DBD, confirming the ovarian cancer cluster region effect in BRCA2. Conclusions: The study demonstrates that the HDR functional assay in conjunction with other clinical and genomic data can be a powerful tool that can aid in the reclassification of &gt; 95% of missense variants in BRCA2. In addition, missense PVs in DBD were noted to have a similarly elevated risk of breast cancer as PTVs. The reclassification of the BRCA2 missense VUS and identification of associated breast cancer risk in this study will significantly influence breast cancer risk assessment and management strategies among carriers of these missense variants.

Polygenic risk score calibration and association with breast cancer in diverse ancestries.

10505 Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have been shown to substantially improve breast cancer (BC) risk prediction when incorporated into traditional risk assessment models. However, PRS developed primarily in women of European ancestry have shown poor performance when applied to non-European populations. We previously described development and validation of a multiple-ancestry PRS (MA-PRS) that is based on individual ancestral genetic composition. MA-PRS has been incorporated into the Tyrer-Cuzick model for use in clinical practice and has been shown to provide independent value to the model. Here, we describe performance of the MA-PRS in a large cohort of women from diverse ancestral backgrounds. Methods: The study cohort included 203,586 patients who were referred for hereditary cancer testing and negative for pathogenic variants in genes associated with BC. MA-PRS was calculated as previously described based on 149 SNPs (93 BC and 56 ancestry-informative). Association of MA-PRS with invasive BC status (affected vs unaffected) was analyzed using logistic regression adjusted for personal and family cancer history, age, and ancestry. Calibration was assessed by examining the MA-PRS distribution within unaffected patients, and through goodness-of-fit tests. All analyses were conducted within the full cohort and within ancestral subpopulations. Odds ratios (ORs) are reported per standard deviation. Results: One-fifth (43,782/203,586, 21.5%) of patients were diagnosed with invasive BC, and 60,657 (29.8%) of patients reported BC in a first degree relative. The MA-PRS distribution was centered around zero among unaffected patients overall and within each subpopulation. MA-PRS significantly improved BC risk prediction over clinical factors in the full cohort (OR = 1.43, 95% CI:1.41-1.44) and within each ancestral subpopulation (Table). The strongest associations were observed in Ashkenazi Jewish (OR = 1.56, 95% CI:1.39-1.76) and South Asian (OR = 1.49,95% CI: 1.23-1.81) populations. The top decile of the MA-PRS consistently identified patients with two-fold increased risk of developing BC. Goodness-of-fit tests showed that the MA-PRS was well calibrated and predicted BC risk accurately in the tails of the distribution for both European and non-European women. Conclusions: The breast cancer MA-PRS based on genetic ancestral composition is well-calibrated and strongly associated with BC in all tested ancestral populations. Incorporation of PRS adds independent information to risk models and supports equitable access to personalized BC risk management. [Table: see text]

Impact of risk-reducing mastectomy on quality of life of women with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

10623 Background: Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) is a common strategy for managing breast cancer (BC) risk in women with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). Data on uptake and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in LFS are limited and often extrapolated from BRCA scenario, despite the lack of evidence on survival benefits in LFS. This study evaluated RRM uptake and its impact on HRQoL in women with LFS. Methods: TP53 PV female carriers from a Brazilian LFS cohort from January 2012 to December 2022 were eligible. After informed consent, 90 women reported oncological status, uptake of RRM, and completed BREAST-Q questionnaire. Scores were compared among different BC risk management strategies and minimal important difference (MID) of ≥ 4 was described. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify surgical factors related to HRQoL outcomes. Results: 71.7% (n=33) of women diagnosed with unilateral BC (n=46) underwent contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) at a median age of 39 years. Among unaffected BC women (n=44), 36.3% underwent bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) at a median age of 36 years. CRRM was associated with lower scores for psychosocial (64[±19] vs 93[±21], p=.05) and physical well-being (72[±16] vs 92[±18], p=.001). BRRM women had lower physical well-being scores (72[±19] vs 92[±13], p=.003). MID associated with worst HRQoL outcomes were seen in all four domains on CRRM women and on satisfaction with breasts and physical well-being of BRRM patients (table). Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) presented better psychosocial (74[±20] vs 52[±19], p=.04) and sexual well-being (60[±20] vs 46[±20], p=.05) when compared to skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) on CRRM patients and with higher sexual well-being (60[±20] vs 46[±20], p=.05) on BRRM patients. Women with BRRM &gt; 2 years had better physical well-being (83[±14] vs 56 [±12], p&lt;.001). There were no significant differences in scores of women with age £35 years at the time of BRRM, although MID ≥ 4 was observed on psychosocial and sexual well-being and satisfaction with breasts: -23.0, -14.4, and -20.0, respectively. Conclusions: We observed high rates of RRM in LFS women and those were associated with worse outcomes on breast HRQoL in comparison to surveillance. The potential benefits and harms of RRM should be carefully discussed with patients before performing it, especially in LFS women where the survival benefits of these interventions remain uncertain. [Table: see text]

Male breast cancer risk associated with pathogenic variants in genes other than BRCA1/2: an Italian case-control study

BackgroundGermline pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/2 genes are associated with breast cancer (BC) risk in both women and men. Multigene panel testing is being increasingly used for BC risk assessment, allowing the identification of PVs in genes other than BRCA1/2. While data on actionable PVs in other cancer susceptibility genes are now available in female BC, reliable data are still lacking in male BC (MBC). This study aimed to provide the patterns, prevalence and risk estimates associated with PVs in non-BRCA1/2 genes for MBC in order to improve BC prevention for male patients. MethodsWe performed a large case-control study in the Italian population, including 767 BRCA1/2-negative MBCs and 1349 male controls, all screened using a custom 50 cancer gene panel. ResultsPVs in genes other than BRCA1/2 were significantly more frequent in MBCs compared with controls (4.8% vs 1.8%, respectively) and associated with a threefold increased MBC risk (OR: 3.48, 95% CI: 1.88–6.44; p < 0.0001). PV carriers were more likely to have personal (p = 0.03) and family (p = 0.02) history of cancers, not limited to BC. PALB2 PVs were associated with a sevenfold increased MBC risk (OR: 7.28, 95% CI: 1.17–45.52; p = 0.034), and ATM PVs with a fivefold increased MBC risk (OR: 4.79, 95% CI: 1.12–20.56; p = 0.035). ConclusionsThis study highlights the role of PALB2 and ATM PVs in MBC susceptibility and provides risk estimates at population level. These data may help in the implementation of multigene panel testing in MBC patients and inform gender-specific BC risk management and decision making for patients and their families.

Abstract P6-02-13: Expanding the reach of germline genetic testing: Use of web-based risk assessment to inform medical management amongst patients at breast and imaging centers

Abstract Background Developing an effective approach to the identification of individuals at increased cancer risk is key to preventing and/or providing early diagnosis of cancer. However, outside of targeted genetics clinics, under identification of individuals with hereditary cancer risk is well recognized, due in part to ever evolving complexity of germline genetic testing criteria and lack of systematic framework to perform robust risk assessment on all patients. In contrast, breast and imaging centers are ideally positioned to maximize the impact of positive genetic test results due to immediate availability of surveillance and diagnostic tools. Here we present data from breast and imaging centers using a patient-facing digital platform offered universally to all patients before their scheduled appointment designed to collect personal and family health information and assess cancer risk and genetic testing eligibility based on current guidelines. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients in breast and imaging centers who used a web-based risk stratification tool before standard ambulatory appointments to assess their lifetime risk for breast cancer based on the Tyrer-Cuzick (version 8.0) risk algorithm and eligibility for National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN®) genetic testing criteria at the time of assessment. Testing criteria included hereditary breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancers, Lynch syndrome, and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Data was pulled for patients seen from June 2020 through May 2022 at participating breast and imaging centers throughout the United States. Outcome measures included percentage of individuals who completed the risk-assessment, met testing criteria, pursued germline genetic testing, received a positive germline result, and/or had a Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk ≥20%. Results A total of 251,492 individuals completed assessments; 250,011 (99%) were females aged 18 years or older. Overall, at the time of assessment 80,814/251,492 (32.1%) met genetic testing criteria and 24.4% (19,694) of those meeting criteria opted to proceed with germline genetic testing. An additional 1,561 individuals who did not meet criteria pursued genetic testing. Of the 18,532 completed genetic tests, 1,507 (8.1%) had positive genetic test results. The majority of positive individuals (93%) met testing criteria. 40.7% (613/1,507) of positive results had an impact on breast cancer risk management options. In addition to individuals identified as high-risk through germline genetic testing evaluations, 13.1% (28,108/214,269) of individuals assessed using the Tyrer-Cuzick algorithm had ≥20% lifetime risk of breast cancer and met the threshold for modified medical management. Conclusion In this study, the web-based assessment tool provided a standardized workflow that enabled individuals interested in receiving cancer risk assessment and germline testing an opportunity to do so. When offered to all patients, this digital platform can offer a scalable opportunity for breast and imaging centers to identify individuals eligible for modified medical management for breast cancer risk and other inherited cancer syndromes, which may ultimately improve the prevention and early treatment of individuals with cancer predisposition. Citation Format: Heather Fecteau, Haley Keller, Carrie Horton, Carrie Milliard, Robert Pilarski, Lukas Lyon, Lily Hoang, Shannon Kieran. Expanding the reach of germline genetic testing: Use of web-based risk assessment to inform medical management amongst patients at breast and imaging centers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-02-13.

The Association Between the Risk of Breast Cancer and Epigallocatechin- 3-Gallate Intake: A Literature Review of a Potential Chemopreventive Agent.

According to the latest epidemiological data, breast cancer has recently been the most frequently diagnosed malignancy. To date, a body of evidence has established the involvement of multiple - and frequently interrelated - genetic and environmental factors in the pathogenesis of the disease. Emerging research on cancer prevention has highlighted the deterrence potential of interventions targeting environmental risk factors, particularly diet. In this aspect, the current review reveals the latest scientific results regarding epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) - a catechin most commonly found in green tea, as a potential chemopreventive dietary agent against breast cancer. in vitro studies on EGCG have demonstrated its effect on cell cycle progression and its potential to suppress several intracellular signaling pathways involved in breast cancer pathogenesis. In addition, EGCG possesses specific apoptosis-inducing characteristics that seem to enhance its role as a regulator of cell survival. Preclinical data seem to support using EGCG as an effective adjunct to EGFR-targeting treatments. The authors' appraisal of the literature suggests that although preclinical evidence has documented the anticarcinogenic features of EGCG, limited large-scale epidemiological studies are investigating the consumption of EGCG - containing nutrients in the prevention and management of breast cancer risk. This literature review aims to liaise between preclinical and epidemiological research, surveying the existing evidence and unraveling relevant knowledge gaps.

Prognostic Importance of Nodal Microenvironment beyond Extracapsular Extension in Breast Cancer Outcomes

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Lymph node (LN) involvement and extracapsular extension (ECE) play important roles in breast cancer risk stratification, management, and outcome. Involvement of other axillary tissues (AXT) excised during surgery is often omitted in pathology reports and its prognostic significance is yet to be elucidated. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Medical records of 1,919 breast cancer patients with pathologic lymph nodes treated at our institution from 2000-2019 was retrospectively reviewed. Extensive details of LN involvement are reported by pathologists at our institution and were divided into 4 groups: LN+ only, LN+ECE, LN+AXT without ECE, and LN+ECE+AXT. AXT was defined as the involvement of lymphatic vessels, blood vessels, soft tissue metastasis, matted unspecified masses and combination of any of those forms. The primary endpoint was the impact of AXT on locoregional failure (LRF) defined as recurrence in either breast/chest wall/axilla/supraclavicular fossa, on axillary failure (AF) defined as recurrence in the axilla only and on distant failure (DF) defined as metastasis. Subgroup analysis explored the differences between types of AXT and Cox Hazard models were used. <h3>Results</h3> Among 1,919 patients analyzed, 995 had LN+ only involvement, 534 had LN+ECE, 81 had LN+AXT without ECE, and 309 had LN+ECE+AXT. The overall median follow-up was 6.5 years. The 10 years cumulative incidence of LRF was 5.9%, 6.4%, 11.8% and 10.9% in LN only, LN+ECE, LN+AXT without ECE and LN+ECE+AXT groups, respectively. The 10 years cumulative incidence of AF was 0.92%, 0.83%, 4.1% and 4.4% in LN+ only, LN+ECE, LN+AXT without ECE and LN+ECE+AXT groups, respectively. The 10 years cumulative incidence of DF was 15.7%, 23%, 23.5% and 42.1% in LN+ only, LN+ECE, LN+AXT without ECE and LN+ECE+AXT groups, respectively. On multivariable analysis controlling for number of malignant LN, ECE, tumor biology, grade and size, type of axillary surgery and radiation dose delivered to the draining lymphatics, the presence of other AXT was significantly associated with LRF (HR:2.3, P<0.01), AF (HR:4.7, P<0.01) and DF (HR: 1.4, P=0.02). ECE and number of malignant LN were not associated with LRF and AF, but rather associated with DF (HR:1.4, P=0.009 and HR:1.03, P=0.002, respectively). Delivery of 50 Gy or more to draining lymphatics was associated with better axillary control (HR:0.3, P=0.01) compared to 45 Gy. No significant difference between 45 Gy and 50 Gy to the lymphatics was observed for LRF and DF. Subgroup analysis did not show a difference between the described forms of AXT on LRF and DF. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Pathologic evaluation of the axilla's microenvironment beyond tumor deposits in lymph nodes and ECE is important to ensure adequate local control in the axilla. Given the higher risk of recurrence posed by tumor infiltration into surrounding axillary tissues, delivery of at least 50Gy to lymphatics should be considered. Our findings demonstrate the need for pathology reports to include assessment of the axilla's microenvironment.

Management of ovarian and breast cancer risk in non-BRCA HBOC pathogenic variant carriers in a large California health care system

PurposeTo describe breast and ovarian cancer risk reduction strategies in the clinical management of women who test positive for non-BRCA hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) pathogenic variants compared to those who test positive for pathogenic BRCA variants or have negative germline panel testing. MethodsExamination of imaging and preventive surgeries in women undergoing HBOC genetic testing from 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2018, with follow up to 03/31/2020 in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. ResultsA total of 13,271 tests which included HBOC genes were identified. Rate of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy after genetic testing were similar for BRCA and the non-BRCA moderate risk ovarian pathogenic variants (PVs) (47.4% vs 54%, p = 0.25). Rates were lower for low risk or unknownrisk non-BRCA PVs (12.8%, p < 0.001, 5.3% (p < 0.001). Rates of surveillance for ovarian cancer with ultrasound and CA 125 in the first year was 63.3% and 64.7% for BRCA PV, 37.5% and 27.1%, for non-BRCA moderate risk PVs and 13.7% and 4.6%, for low-risk PVs. Bilateral mastectomy rates were 19.7% for BRCA PV, 10.1% (p = 0.028) for non-BRCA breast high risk PVs, for moderate risk PVs 7.7% (p < 0.001) and for unknown risk 0.4% (p < 0.001). MRI surveillance rates in the first year similarly were 47.4% for non-BRCA BRCA PV, 43% for breast high risk PV, 39.4% for moderate risk and 4.9% for unknown risk PV. ConclusionSurgical and surveillance strategies are underutilized for HBOC PV, however there is concordance of uptake of preventive strategies with specific risk associated with non-BRCA PVs.

Breast cancer knowledge among health professionals: A pre-post-knowledge-based intervention study.

Breast-cancer-related morbidity and mortality can be reduced by following worldwide-accepted screening guidelines and by appropriate education and training of health professionals on risk identification and screening. The study aimed to determine the significance of educational sessions in improving health professionals' knowledge about breast cancer, particularly screening modalities that can benefit the patients. An interventional study was conducted among 260 health professionals, including medical students, nurses, and allied health professionals. The intervention was an educational session on breast cancer risks and screening guidelines. Health professionals' knowledge about breast cancer risk, presentation, and screening were tested by a structured questionnaire before and after the educational session. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 26. Chi-square was used to identify differences in pre and post-test. P value was considered significant at <0.05. There is a significant difference between pre-session and post-session responses in all areas of knowledge about breast cancer, with much improved outcomes after the educational session. Health professionals lack knowledge about breast cancer risk factors, screening tools, presentation, and management. Regular education sessions improve these knowledge gaps and help early detection and treatment of women at risk of breast cancer.

Assessing Risk and Knowledge of Women on Breast Cancer and Providing Lifestyle Advice for the Management of Breast Cancer Risk

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and is the main cause of cancer mortality among women in the world. Overall, 1 in 28 women is likely to develop breast cancer during her lifetime. Although the mortality rate is decreasing, the incidence is persistently increasing due to urbanization and lifestyle changes. So, there is a need to assess the personal breast cancer risk and increase the knowledge of women on early detection. The present study aims to assess the risk and knowledge of women on breast cancer. The main objective of the study is to identify the women at high risk, to create awareness among women about early screening and detection and to educate lifestyle management to decrease breast cancer risk. A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed during the period of June 2019 to November 2019 in the women attended for mammographic examination. A total of 270 women responded to the study. The results showed that five-year risk is found to be high for 31.1% of women and low for 68.8% of women with a mean of 1.4 and the standard deviation is 1.24. About 14.81% of women were found to have strong lifetime risk and 30.37% of women had average lifetime risk and 54.81% women had usual lifetime risk. The mean lifetime risk of the women is 16.09 and the standard deviation is 10.2. The majority of the participants have low knowledge on breast cancer; BSE, and mammography i.e., 80% of them were lack of knowledge. The mean knowledge score is 6.34 and the standard deviation is 5.45. The women who had high five-year and strong lifetime risk are eligible for breast cancer prevention and management approaches. The women with moderate lifetime risk were advised with regular screening and Breast Self-Examination practices.

Current Practices in the Pathologic Assessment of Breast Tissue in Transmasculine Chest Surgery.

No guidelines exist regarding management of breast tissue for transmasculine and gender-nonconforming individuals. This study aims to investigate the experiences and practices regarding perioperative breast cancer risk management among the American Society of Plastic Surgeons members performing chest masculinization surgery. An anonymous, online, 19-question survey was sent to 2517 U.S.-based American Society of Plastic Surgeons members in October of 2019. A total of 69 responses were analyzed. High-volume surgeons were more likely from academic centers (OR, 4.88; 95 percent CI, 1.67 to 15.22; p = 0.005). Age older than 40 years [ n = 59 (85.5 percent)] and family history of breast cancer in first-degree relatives [ n = 47 (68.1 percent)] or family with a diagnosis before age 40 [ n = 49 (71.0 percent)] were the most common indications for preoperative imaging. Nineteen of the respondents (27.5 percent) routinely excise all macroscopic breast tissue, with 21 (30.4 percent) routinely leaving breast tissue. Fifty-one respondents (73.9 percent) routinely send specimens for pathologic analysis. There was no significant correlation between surgical volume or type of practice and odds of sending specimens for pathologic analysis. High patient costs and patient reluctance [ n = 27 (39.1 percent) and n = 24 (35.3 percent), respectively] were the most often cited barriers for sending specimens for pathologic analysis. Six respondents (8.7 percent) have found malignant or premalignant lesions in masculinizing breast specimens. Large variation was found among surgeons' perioperative management of chest masculinizing surgery patients regarding preoperative cancer screening, pathologic assessment of resected tissue, and postoperative cancer surveillance. Standardization of care and further studies are needed to document risk, incidence, and prevalence of breast cancer in the transmasculine population before and after surgery.

EPR22-113: Awareness, Utilization, and NCCN Guideline-Adherence to Breast Cancer Risk Management Behavior Among a Community-Based Sample of High-Risk Women

"EPR22-113: Awareness, Utilization, and NCCN Guideline-Adherence to Breast Cancer Risk Management Behavior Among a Community-Based Sample of High-Risk Women" published on 31 Mar 2022 by National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Understanding breast cancer risk factors: is there any mismatch between laywomen perceptions and expert opinions

BackgroundWomen’s perception and knowledge of breast cancer signs, symptoms, and risk factors could be conducive to breast cancer risk management and interventions. The present study aimed to explore Iranian laywomen perceptions and expert opinions regarding breast cancer risk factors.MethodsThis qualitative study was conducted from March to November 2019 in Mashhad, northeast of Iran. Through purposive sampling, 24 laywomen (women with and without BC) and 10 experts of different fields including oncology, surgery, gynecology and reproductive health were selected. Data collection was carried out using semi-structured interviews, which was mainly focused on the participants’ understanding and perception of BC risk factors. The data was analyzed utilizing conventional content analysis developed by Graneheim & Lundman. Components of trustworthiness, including credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability were considered.ResultsThe main category of risk factors, which emerged from the lay participants’ data analysis, were “unhealthy lifestyle and habits” , “hormonal influences”, “environmental exposures”, “Individual susceptibility “and “belief in supernatural powers”. The experts had similar perspectives for certain risk factors, yet not for all. The category of “Individual history of disease” was emerged only from experts’ interviews.ConclusionIn the present study, the lay participants’ perception concerning BC risk factors was found to be a mixture of cultural beliefs and the scientific knowledge dispersed by the media, internet, and health services. Primary prevention approaches, including awareness of breast cancer risk factors, are required for women to make improved health-related choices.

Breast cancer polygenic risk scores: a 12-month prospective study of patient reported outcomes and risk management behavior

To prospectively assess patient reported outcomes and risk management behavior of women choosing to receive (receivers) or decline (decliners) their breast cancer polygenic risk score (PRS). Women either unaffected or affected by breast cancer and from families with no identified pathogenic variant in a breast cancer risk gene were invited to receive their PRS. All participants completed a questionnaire at study enrollment. Receivers completed questionnaires at two weeks and 12 months after receiving their PRS, and decliners a second questionnaire at 12 months post study enrollment. Of the 208 participants, 165 (79%) received their PRS. Among receivers, there were no changes in anxiety or distress following testing. However, compared to women with a low PRS, those with a high PRS reported greater genetic testing-specific distress, perceived risk, decisional regret, and less genetic testing-positive response. At 12 months, breast screening and uptake of risk-reducing strategies were consistent with current Australian guidelines of breast cancer risk management. Reasons for declining PRS included being unable to attend the appointment in person and concerns over potential emotional response. The outcomes of the study provide insight into women's responses to receiving PRS and highlight the issues that need to be addressed in the associated model of genetic counseling.

Using Protection Motivation Theory to Predict Intentions for Breast Cancer Risk Management: Intervention Mechanisms from a Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the direct and indirect effects of a web-based, Protection Motivation Theory (PMT)–informed breast cancer education and decision support tool on intentions for risk-reducing medication and breast MRI among high-risk women. Women with ≥ 1.67% 5-year breast cancer risk (N = 995) were randomized to (1) control or (2) the PMT-informed intervention. Six weeks post-intervention, 924 (93% retention) self-reported PMT constructs and behavioral intentions. Bootstrapped mediations evaluated the direct effect of the intervention on behavioral intentions and the mediating role of PMT constructs. There was no direct intervention effect on intentions for risk-reducing medication or MRI (p’s ≥ 0.12). There were significant indirect effects on risk-reducing medication intentions via perceived risk, self-efficacy, and response efficacy, and on MRI intentions via perceived risk and response efficacy (p’s ≤ 0.04). The PMT-informed intervention effected behavioral intentions via perceived breast cancer risk, self-efficacy, and response efficacy. Future research should extend these findings from intentions to behavior. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03029286 (date of registration: January 24, 2017).