Breast Cancer Patients In Germany Research Articles

Cost consequence model of the MammaPrint (70-gene signature) and 21-gene signature in patients with primary HR+HER2-, N1 early-stage breast cancer in Germany.

534 Background: The MammaPrint 70-gene and Oncotype DX 21-gene signatures serve to stratify breast cancer tumors, distinguishing between those with low or high risk of distant metastasis. Patients with a low genomic risk tumor have the option to avoid overtreatment by omitting chemotherapy and minimize associated toxicities. This analysis evaluates the economic impact of implementing MammaPrint, Oncotype DX (ODx), or no gene signature testing for patients with HR+ HER2- early breast cancer with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes (N1) in Germany. Methods: We constructed a cost-consequence model to assess the budget implications of MammaPrint, ODx, and not employing a gene signature, considering both the healthcare payers and societal perspective. The model focuses on patients with HR+/HER2-/N1 breast tumors who, in the absence of a gene expression analysis, would receive chemotherapy in 63% of cases according to the data of the certified breast cancers in Germany. Input data were sourced from MINDACT, RxPONDER, literature, the EBM, the DRG system. The healthcare payer perspective covers testing, direct/indirect costs of chemotherapy, and disease recurrence costs. The societal perspective adds transport costs and productivity losses to these. Results: A projected 9,207 HR+/HER2-/N1 breast cancer patients were candidates for genomic testing. In MINDACT, patients were classified as MammaPrint Low Risk in 73% of cases, and in RxPONDER 83% of patients were categorized as ODx Low Risk (RS 0-25). The model demonstrated per patient savings from a healthcare payer perspective of €3.766 for MammaPrint and €900 for ODx compared to not using any gene signature for N1 breast cancer patients in Germany. Importantly, the savings are even more substantial from a societal perspective, reaching €11.815 for MammaPrint and €11.243 for ODx. When limiting the population to women >50 years, similar results were observed with per patient savings from a payer perspective of €3.766 and €1.549, and from a societal perspective of €9.826 and €9.349, for MammaPrint and ODx, respectively. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that personalized treatment planning with genomic testing for breast cancer with HR+/HER2-/LN1 breast cancer, leads to a reduction in chemotherapy use and associated costs in Germany. Although MammaPrint designates a smaller proportion of genomically high risk patients compared to ODx, MammaPrint Low Risk patients without chemotherapy demonstrate higher survival outcomes. Consequently, any increased chemotherapy costs are offset by lower testing and distant recurrence expenses, making MammaPrint a cost-conscious option.

Statistical analysis plan for the PRO B study: open-label, superiority randomised controlled trial of alarm-based patient-reported outcome monitoring in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundWith an increasing collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in oncological patients, there is still a lack of standardised strategies on how to interpret and use these data in patient care. Prior research has shown support for the use of digital PRO monitoring together with alarm systems to notify clinicians when the PRO values are deteriorating. This system has demonstrated advantages in improving HRQoL and increasing survival rates among oncology patients. Hence, we designed the PRO B study, a superiority multi-centre randomised controlled trial, to investigate the effects of alarm-based monitoring in metastatic breast cancer patients in Germany. The study protocol for the PRO B study was published in September 2021, and this manuscript describes a formal statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the PRO B study to improve the transparency and quality of this trial.Methods and designThe trial aimed to recruit 1000 patients with metastatic breast cancer. However, as of the completion of recruitment on June 15, 2023, we have successfully enrolled 924 patients from 52 breast cancer centres. Patients were 1:1 stratified randomised to the intervention and control groups. App-based PRO questionnaires are sent weekly to the intervention group and every 3 months to the control group. Only patients in the intervention group trigger an alarm if their PRO scores deteriorate, and they are subsequently contacted by the local care team within 48 h. The primary outcome is the fatigue score at 6 months, and secondary outcomes are other HRQoL and overall survival. Evaluation of the superiority of the intervention will be done using a linear mixed model with random intercepts for study centres.ConclusionThis detailed SAP defines the main components of the statistical analysis for the PRO B study to assist the statistician and prevent bias in selecting analysis and reporting findings. Version 1 of the SAP was finalised on January 18, 2024.Trial registrationDRKS (German Clinical Trials Register) DRKS00024015. Registered on February 15, 2021.

Neratinib as Extended Adjuvant Treatment of HER2-Positive/HR-Positive Early Breast Cancer Patients in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: Interim Results of the Prospective, Observational ELEANOR Study

Introduction: Prognosis of patients diagnosed with HER2+ early breast cancer (eBC) has substantially improved, but distant recurrences impacting quality of life and survival still occur. One treatment option for extended adjuvant treatment of patients with HER2+/HR+ eBC is neratinib, available in Europe for patients who completed adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy within 1 year. The ELEANOR study is investigating the real-world use of neratinib in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Results from an interim analysis of the first 200 patients observed for ≥3 months are reported. Methods: The primary objective of this prospective, multicenter, observational study is to assess patient adherence to neratinib (defined as the percentage of patients taking neratinib on ≥75% prescribed days). Secondary objectives are patient characteristics and treatment outcomes. Results: At cut-off (May 2, 2022), a total of 202 patients had been observed for ≥3 months, with neratinib treatment documented for 187 patients (median age: 53.0 years; 67.9% at increased risk of disease recurrence). In total, 151 (80.7%) patients had received prior neoadjuvant treatment; of these, 82 (54.3%) patients achieved a pathologically complete response. Neratinib was initiated at a median 3.6 months after trastuzumab-based treatment, with 36.4% starting at a dose <240 mg/day. Treatment is ongoing for 46.0% of patients, with median treatment duration of 11.2 (interquartile range 0.9–12.0) months. Diarrhea was the most common adverse event (78.6% any grade, 20.3% grade ≥3); pharmacologic prophylaxis was used in 85.6% of patients. Conclusions: The pattern of anti-HER2 pretreatment observed reflected the current treatment for HER2+/HR+ eBC in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. These interim results suggest that neratinib as an extended adjuvant is a feasible option after various anti-HER2 pretreatments and that its tolerability can be managed and improved with proactive diarrhea management.

A nested case-control study on radiation dose-response for cardiac events in breast cancer patients in Germany

BackgroundPrevious studies with the majority of breast cancer (BC) patients treated up to 2000 provided evidence that radiation dose to the heart from radiotherapy (RT) was linearly associated with increasing risk for long-term cardiac disease. RT techniques changed substantially over time. This study aimed to investigate the dose-dependent cardiac risk in German BC patients treated with more contemporary RT. MethodsIn a cohort of 11,982 BC patients diagnosed in 1998–2008, we identified 494 women treated with 3D-conformal RT who subsequently developed a cardiac event. Within a nested case-control approach, these cases were matched to 988 controls. Controls were patients without a cardiac event after RT until the index date of the corresponding case. Separate multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to assess the association of radiation to the complete heart and to the left anterior heart wall (LAHW) with cardiac events. ResultsMean dose to the heart for cases with left-sided BC was 4.27 Gy and 1.64 Gy for cases with right-sided BC. For controls, corresponding values were 4.31 Gy and 1.66 Gy, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) per 1 Gy increase in dose to the complete heart was 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94–1.05, P = .72). The OR per 1 Gy increase in LAHW dose was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98–1.01, P = .68). ConclusionsContrary to previous studies, our study provided no evidence that radiation dose to the heart from 3D-conformal RT for BC patients treated between 1998 and 2008 was associated with risk of cardiac events.

Is patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences associated with their fear of progression?

Previous studies found that some breast cancer patients in Germany are invited to participate in a multidisciplinary tumor conference (MTC) during the discussion of their own case. MTCs are regular meetings of a treatment team in which the diagnosis and treatment plan of cancer patients are discussed. Psychological consequences concerning the patients' participation in an MTC have not been examined yet. This study examines the association between patients' participation in MTC and patients' fear of progression (FoP). This analysis is part of a larger project named "Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences in Breast Cancer Care" (PINTU) which is a multicenter observational mixed-methods study. The study was conducted in six breast and gynecological cancer centers in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Data were collected from 2018 to 2020 by patient survey at three time points. Patients with (n=81) and without (n=120) MTC participation were compared. FoP was measured with a 12-item short form of the FoP Questionnaire (FoP-Q-SF) at all three measurement time points. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, a one-way repeated variance analysis (ANOVA), and a one-way repeated ANCOVA using the propensity score as a covariate. Data of n=201 patients were included in the analysis. In general, FoP scores decreased in both groups from T0 to T2 (F=36.539, p<0.001, η2 =0.155). Non-participating patients did not differ with regard to their FoP from patients who participated in an MTC before and after participation. The results of AN(C)OVA revealed no significant effects concerning the influence of patient participation in an MTC on FoP (F=0.014, p=0.907, η2 = <0.001 and (F=0.013, p=0.909, η2 = <0.001). Since the FoP is not influenced by participation, the findings do not support recommendations for or against patient participation in an MTC. Further research should focus on the question of which patient groups might benefit from participation in an MTC with regard to which outcome variables.

Does basic information concerning nutrition improve the information needs of breast cancer patients? An evaluation

PurposeInternational and national studies have shown unmet information needs regarding nutrition in breast cancer patients. An intervention study has examined the question of the extent to which a fact sheet on the topic of nutrition is suitable to cover the need for information of breast cancer patients.MethodThe fact sheet with basic information on nutrition was distributed in 21 intervention breast care centres in 2017. The use of the fact sheets was evaluated in a quasi-experimental design as part of the annual breast cancer patients’ survey of the University of Cologne. The breast cancer patients considered were being treated with primary breast carcinoma in a hospital in North Rhine-Westphalia. A multilevel analysis was carried out in order to quantify the effect of the intervention.ResultsUnmet information needs are experienced more by younger and non-native German-speaking patients. With regard to education, patients without a graduation and a high grade of education express more unmet information needs. The multilevel analysis showed that patients who were treated at an intervention site and therefore possibly received the fact sheet have a significantly higher chance of their information needs being met (OR = 1.45; p ≤ 0.05).ConclusionThe intervention study showed that a fact sheet with basic information on nutrition is a possible instrument to satisfy the information needs of breast cancer patients and therefore reduce unmet information needs regarding nutrition. This intervention study is a pragmatic example on how to reduce unmet information needs among breast cancer patients in Germany.

Survivors of primary breast cancer 5years after surgery: follow-up care, long-term problems, and treatment regrets. Results of the prospective BRENDA II-study.

This study aims to answer the questions where breast cancer patients in Germany receive follow-up care (with what types of doctors) and what are the long-term problems and treatment regrets of breast cancer patients. In the prospective multicenter cohort study BRENDA II ("Breast Cancer under Evidence-Based Guidelines"), 456 patients with primary breast cancer were sampled consecutively over a period of 4 years (2009-2012) and contacted again 5years after surgery. Long-term problems were elicited on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ('not at all') to 3 ('very much'). 82% of the patients receive follow-up (FU) at the private practice gynecologist. In 22%, the initial treating hospital is involved in the FU, and in 20% the general practitioner does this (multiple answers possible). Long-term problems attributed to the treatment were most often related to endocrine therapy (mean 1.29) and to chemotherapy (mean 0.94). Most of the patients were happy to have had radiotherapy (95%). For chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and antibody therapy, the satisfaction for the treatment decision was 87%, 87%, and 84% respectively. Among patients who reported they regretted having undergone a recommended treatment, it was most often for endocrine therapy (5%) and chemotherapy (4%). In Germany, different specialists are involved in the patients' FU care for BC. The detection of long-term problems due to BC treatment is an essential part of FU care.

Waiting time, communication quality, and patient satisfaction: An analysis of moderating influences on the relationship between perceived waiting time and the satisfaction of breast cancer patients during their inpatient stay

ObjectiveWaiting time has been consistently found to be a significant predictor of patient dissatisfaction. The aim of this study is to examine whether positive communication experiences with health care providers could moderate the negative relationship between waiting time and patient satisfaction. MethodsData from a sample of 4626 breast cancer patients in Germany during their inpatient stay were analyzed. Multilevel logistic regression models were estimated in order to examine whether health literacy-sensitive communication (HL-COM) moderates the negative effects of perceived long waiting times on satisfaction. The models were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical information and personality. ResultsPatients who perceived long waiting times were significantly less likely to be satisfied with treatment and with their hospital. Among patients who experienced high HL-COM, the negative relationship between perceived waiting time and satisfaction disappeared, with minimal differences in satisfaction between those who perceived waiting long and those who did not. ConclusionWhile waiting time persists as a significant predictor of satisfaction, this study finds that positive communication experiences with health care providers could potentially alleviate negative effects of long waiting time. Practice implicationsAlong with the ongoing efforts to reduce waiting time, the improvement of health literacy-sensitive communication could be instrumental in patients’ overall inpatient assessment.

Recommendation of adjuvant trastuzumab treatment in HER-2-positive breast cancer patients: insights from quality indicator data collected in certified breast cancer centers in Germany, Italy, Austria, and Switzerland.

In 2003, a certification system was introduced to ensure high standards of oncological care in breast cancer patients in Germany. Certified breast cancer centers (BCCs) must fulfill specific requirements including quality indicators (QI) derived from the clinical guidelines that are evaluated in annual audits. When target values for QIs are not fulfilled, centers need to give explanations. We analyzed data from BCCs for a selected indicator: the recommendation of trastuzumab for patients with early HER-2-positive invasive breast cancer. We investigated explanations given in cases when trastuzumab was not recommended to see whether this was justified. Patient data from 274 BCCs treating 53,777 primary cases in 2015 were analyzed using descriptive statistics. In the 274 BCC sites, 5700 primary patients with early HER-2-positive breast cancer were treated in 2015. 128 sites (46.7%) did not reach the target value of 95% trastuzumab recommendation and thus had to give explanations. In these 128 sites, 2663 primary HER-2-positive breast cancer patients were treated, 343 (12.9%) of whom did not receive a recommendation for adjuvant trastuzumab treatment. All 128 sites delivered explanations. Overall, 450 explanations were given, allowing multiple explanations for single patients. No explanation was given for 8 of the 343 patients (2.3%). The most common given explanation was multi-/comorbidity (45.5%). The analysis suggests thorough decision-making when quality indicator target values for a trastuzumab recommendation were not fulfilled. Our data do not provide information on whether such decisions have an impact on treatment outcome for these patients.

Autologous Lipotransfer - Daily Therapeutic Practice in Breast Cancer: An Intergroup Analysis Encompassing NOGGO, WSG, GBG, AWO Gyn and DGPRÄC

Background: Autologous fat transfer in breast reconstruction has become increasingly important in breast reconstructive surgery. Although the indication to obtain fat, the various operative procedures, and the risks for the patient have been addressed in a large number of studies, detailed information on the everyday use of autologous lipotransfer in breast units in Germany is still lacking. Methods: The objective of the study was to obtain primary data on the use of autologous lipotransfer to treat breast cancer patients in Germany and to determine measures for quality assurance in the daily practice. An online questionnaire concerning breast cancer and lipofilling was sent to specialists in gynecology and plastic surgery. Results: Two-thirds of the specialists who responded to the questionnaire use autologous lipotransfer for breast reconstruction and did not report an increase of local recurrence following lipotransfer. There were only small differences between gynecologists and plastic surgeons regarding the procedure and indication for lipotransfer. The method is highly accepted by patients and physicians, and both gynecologists and plastic surgeons rated the improvement achieved through lipofilling as ‘high'. Conclusions: The lack of randomized controlled data, especially in high-risk patients, demonstrates the necessity for a registry study on this topic. Our survey describes, in detail, the indications for lipofilling as well as its appropriate application in breast cancer patients in Germany and may thereby reduce the present therapeutic uncertainties.

Budget impact analysis of gene expression tests to aid therapy decisions for breast cancer patients in Germany

ObjectivesMany women with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer may not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Gene expression tests can reduce chemotherapy over- and undertreatment by providing prognostic information on the likelihood of recurrence and, with Oncotype DX, predictive information on chemotherapy benefit. These tests are currently not reimbursed by German healthcare payers. An analysis was conducted to evaluate the budget impact of gene expression tests in Germany. Materials and methodsCosts of gene expression tests and medical and non-medical costs associated with treatment were assessed from healthcare payer and societal perspectives. Costs were estimated from data collected at a university hospital and were combined with decision impact data for Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, Prosigna and EndoPredict (EPclin). Changes in chemotherapy use and budget impact were evaluated over 1 year for 20,000 women. ResultsChemotherapy was associated with substantial annual costs of EUR 19,003 and EUR 84,412 per therapy from the healthcare payer and societal perspective, respectively. Compared with standard care, only Oncotype DX was associated with cost savings to healthcare payers and society (EUR 5.9 million and EUR 253 million, respectively). Scenario analysis showed that both women at high clinical but low genomic risk and low clinical but high genomic risk were important contributors to costs. ConclusionsOncotype DX was the only gene expression test that was estimated to reduce costs versus standard care in Germany. The reimbursement of Oncotype DX testing in standard clinical practice in Germany should be considered.

Use of complementary and integrative medicine among German breast cancer patients: predictors and implications for patient care within the PRAEGNANT study network.

The present study aims to analyze a cohort of advanced breast cancer patients in Germany to assess their interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and patient's use of most frequent CAM methods. Based on the PREGNANT real-time breast cancer registry which is a multicenter study in Germany, questionnaires of 580 patients with advanced breast cancer were evaluated. The implemented questionnaire for CAM asked for general interest in CAM and for patient's use of different CAM methods at present and in the past. The interest and application of CAM were analyzed for association with patients' characteristics such as tumor, patient, and therapy characteristics. In total, 436 out of 580 (75%) patients claimed to be interested in CAM. Further, interest in CAM is significantly correlated with younger age and absence of metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Multivariate analysis confirmed the patient's age and distant disease status at the time of diagnosis as related to interest in CAM. A total of 56.4% of patients applied any CAM method in the past. Moreover, with increasing lines of therapies, the more frequent use of CAM was observed. Hereby, praying, vitamin supplements, and other food supplements were most frequently applied. Our data demonstrate high overall interest and frequent use of CAM in advanced breast cancer patients supporting a strong demand of breast cancer patients for complementary counseling and treatments additional to the established cancer therapies. It is indispensable to implement counseling and evidence-based complementary treatments into clinical routine of cancer centers and to adapt postgraduate medical education, respectively.

P216 - Oncotype DX® Breast Recurrence ScoreTM (RS) distribution in primary breast cancer patients in Germany

P216 - Oncotype DX® Breast Recurrence ScoreTM (RS) distribution in primary breast cancer patients in Germany

Importance of durational hormone therapy in breast cancer patients in Germany: Retrospective database analysis.

1603 Background: The ATLAS trial demonstrated an additional benefit in the extension of treatment of breast cancer patients from 5 to 10 years. However, the longer therapy requires good compliance ...

Adherence in tamoxifen therapy after conversion to a rebate pharmaceutical in breast cancer patients in Germany

The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of therapy discontinuation in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen with and without conversion to a rebate pharmaceutical (tamoxifen) and to analyze the negative consequences of rebate contracts on the compliance of breast cancer patients among gynecologist and general practitioner practices in Germany. This retrospective analysis was performed using the IMS Disease Analyzer® database. Women with a diagnosis of breast cancer and first time prescription of tamoxifen in the time from January 2008 until December 2011 were selected. Main outcome measure was the incident the hormone treatment discontinuation rates within 3 years after index date. Treatment discontinuation of tamoxifen was defined as 90 days without this or alternative hormonal therapy (aromatase inhibitors) during that time. In total, 3,620 patients were included in the persistence analysis. 1,712 (47.3%) patients were converted to a rebate product. Within 3 years of follow-up, the discontinuation rates increased to 51.5% for switched patients and 46.3% for patients without switch (p < 0.01). Hazard ratios for 3-year risk of tamoxifen therapy discontinuation were adjusted for age, sex, gynecologist care, patient and physician's residency, baseline co-morbidities (osteoporosis, diabetes, depression and thrombosis, side effects). These analyses comprised a significantly increased risk for treatment discontinuation for patients who were switched to a rebate pharmaceutical compared to patients without conversion to a rebate pharmaceutical (HR: 1.27, CI: 1.05 - 1.53, p = 0.014). This analysis underlines an association between the initiation of rebate contracts and a negative impact on the compliance of breast cancer patients on an adjuvant hormonal treatment The impact of rebate contracts on the health of patients and the health care costs should be evaluated in further therapeutic fields through additional research projects. *both authors contributed equally to the manuscript.

Adherence to tamoxifen therapy after conversion to a discount pharmaceutical in breast cancer patients in Germany

Adherence to tamoxifen therapy after conversion to a discount pharmaceutical in breast cancer patients in Germany

Are there changes in characteristics and therapy of young patients with early-onset breast cancer in Germany over the last decade?

The objective of the study is to investigate recent changes in patient characteristics and treatment procedures of young breast cancer patients over the last 10 years in Germany. The study describes the data of 518 patients who were treated adjuvantly between 2008 and 2011 and participated in a resident mother-child program for rehabilitation (cohort II). The data includes TNM-categories, biology of tumor and therapies. This population is compared to a cohort of 535 patients, who were treated between 2002 and 2006 (cohort I). Characteristics and treatment of cohort II are compared with a normally age distributed cohort. 51.5 % of the patients in cohort II were diagnosed with tumor category pT1, 36.9 % pT2, 4.4 % pT3 and 1.2 % pT4. 3.3 % had merely DCIS. 58.1 % of the patients were pN0, 28.4 % pN1 and 13.5 % had a more intense manifestation of lymph nodes. 45.8 % of the tumors showed a grading classified as G3, 69.3 % were estrogen and progesterone hormone receptor positive and 21.8 % Her2 positive. 24.5 % of the examined patients showed a triple negative carcinoma. 66.2 % of the patients with pT1 or pT2 underwent breast-conserving surgery. Overall 19.2 % of the women received mastectomy only and 17.4 % received mastectomy with subsequent reconstruction. 98.6 % of the patients received axillary surgery, 87.6 % chemotherapy. Overall, 21.0 % of the patients received their chemotherapy in connection with clinical studies. 88.0 % of the patients with hormone receptor positive tumors received endocrine therapy, 25.5 % of them with GnRH-analogs. In comparison with cohort I the tumors in cohort II were detected with a higher proportion of negative lymph nodes (48.8 %/58.1 %, p = 0.008) and G1 grading (4.9/5.6 %, p = 0.001). On the other hand the percentage of triple negative tumors increased from 21.0 % to 24.5 % (p = 0.018). Operative therapy has adjusted to a more moderate way. Breast-conserving therapy with pT1 and pT2 increases from 57.3 % to 66.2 % (p = 0.006), sentinel lymph node biopsy only from 24.5 % to 47.5 % (p[Symbol: see text]0.001) over the years. The percentages of chemotherapy, radiation, endocrine therapy and antibody therapy with positive receptor have stayed stable over the last decade. Comparing cohort II with a normally age distributed group (DMP II 2007-2009) the young patients have still a much lower portion of negative lymph nodes (58.1 %/67.9 %) and positive hormone receptor status (69.3 %/85.1 %). The percentage of a high grading G3 is 45.8 % in cohort II versus 24.7 % in DMP II. The portion of breast-conserving therapy with pT1 is with 68.9 versus 82.2 % still comparatively low. Young patients received more axillary surgery (98.6 %/81.5 %) but less endocrine therapy with hormone receptor positive tumors (93.3 %/94.7 %). Young breast cancer patients in Germany can still be regarded as a special group. Although tumors are now more often detected before reaching the lymph nodes than 10 years ago, an even bigger percentage is triple negative. Operative treatment has improved to a less aggressive way. Still operative and medical treatments have to be chosen after very careful evaluation.

Characteristics and therapy of premenopausal patients with early-onset breast cancer in Germany

The objective of the study is to investigate what kind of tumors young, premenopausal breast cancer patients in Germany show at diagnosis and how they are treated adjuvantly in comparison with a normally distributed cohort. The study describes the data of 535 patients who were treated adjuvantly between 2002 and 2006 and participated in a resident mother-child program for rehabilitation (Groemitz cohort). The data includes TNM categories, biology of tumor and therapies. This population is being compared to an age-heterogeneous cohort from the state of Schleswig-Holstein and the DMP-report of the state of North Rhine-Westphalia. 45.8 % of the patients were diagnosed with tumor category pT1, 37 % pT2, 7.3 % pT3 and 1.9 % pT4. 5 % had merely DCIS. 48.8 % of the patients were pN0, 31.4 % pN1 and 17.4 % had a more intense manifestation of lymph nodes. 43.5 % of the tumors showed a grading classified as G3, 64.3 % were estrogen and progesterone hormone receptor positive and 26.2 % Her2 positive. 21 % of the examined cohort members/patients showed a triple negative carcinoma. 59.1 % of the patients with pT1 underwent breast-conserving surgery, 56.1 % of those with pT2 and 25.6 % of those with pT3. Overall 31.0 % of the women received mastectomy and 14.8 % received mastectomy with subsequent reconstruction. 97.6 % of the patients received axillary surgery, 89.9 % chemotherapy. Overall 23.7 % of the patients received their treatment in connection with clinical studies. 95.3 % of the patients with hormone receptor positive tumor received endocrine therapy, 61.3 % of them with GnRH-analogs. In comparison with the OVIS and DMP cohorts patients of the Groemitz cohort were on average 20 years younger. Their tumors were of bigger size and had more often reached the axillary lymph nodes (pN0 48.8 % Groemitz/62.0 % OVIS/66.7 % DMP). The hormone receptor status was more often negative (35.7/16.6/16.5 %) and tumor grading higher (G3 43.5/29.0/28.5 %). Surgery was more extensive even with small tumors (breast conserving surgery with tumor stage pT1 59.1/81.2/77.6 %) and axillary surgery was performed more often in the young collective (97.6/89.3/62.5 %). More patients of the young collective received chemotherapy (89.9/58.4 %/unknown) and more patients of the young collective with hormone receptor positive tumor received endocrine therapy (95.3/77.4/90.6 %). Our study shows that young breast cancer patients in Germany can be regarded as a special group. At the time of diagnosis the tumor has frequently reached a more advanced stage, and carcinomas are more aggressive. Operative and medical treatment will often be more aggressive.

Patient delay and stage of diagnosis among breast cancer patients in Germany – a population based study

Early diagnosis is a tenet in oncology and should enable early treatment with the expectation of improved outcome. Extent and determinants of patient delay of diagnosis in breast cancer patients and its impact on stage of disease were examined in a population based study among female breast cancer patients in Germany. Two hundred and eighty-seven women, aged 18 to 80 years with newly diagnosed invasive symptomatic breast cancer, were interviewed with respect to the diagnostic process. Patient delay was defined as time from onset of first symptoms to first consultation of a doctor. Median patient delay was 16 days among symptomatic patients. Eighteen per cent of all breast cancer patients waited longer than 3 months before consulting a physician. Long patient delay was associated with old age, history of a benign mastopathy, obesity, and indices of health behaviour such as not knowing a gynaecologist for out-patient care and non-participation in general health screening examinations. A strong association between patient delay and stage at diagnosis was observed for poorly differentiated tumours. These results suggest that at risk groups for delaying consultation can be identified and that a substantial proportion of late stage diagnoses of poorly differentiated breast cancer cases could be avoided if all patients with breast cancer symptoms would present to a doctor within 1 month.

Patient delay and stage of diagnosis among breast cancer patients in Germany -- a population based study.

Early diagnosis is a tenet in oncology and should enable early treatment with the expectation of improved outcome. Extent and determinants of patient delay of diagnosis in breast cancer patients and its impact on stage of disease were examined in a population based study among female breast cancer patients in Germany. Two hundred and eighty-seven women, aged 18 to 80 years with newly diagnosed invasive symptomatic breast cancer, were interviewed with respect to the diagnostic process. Patient delay was defined as time from onset of first symptoms to first consultation of a doctor. Median patient delay was 16 days among symptomatic patients. Eighteen per cent of all breast cancer patients waited longer than 3 months before consulting a physician. Long patient delay was associated with old age, history of a benign mastopathy, obesity, and indices of health behaviour such as not knowing a gynaecologist for out-patient care and non-participation in general health screening examinations. A strong association between patient delay and stage at diagnosis was observed for poorly differentiated tumours. These results suggest that at risk groups for delaying consultation can be identified and that a substantial proportion of late stage diagnoses of poorly differentiated breast cancer cases could be avoided if all patients with breast cancer symptoms would present to a doctor within 1 month.British Journal of Cancer (2002) 86, 1034–1040. DOI: 10.1038/sj/bjc/6600209 www.bjcancer.com© 2002 Cancer Research UK