Chemotherapy For Breast Cancer Research Articles

An optimised patient-derived explant platform for breast cancer reflects clinical responses to chemotherapy and antibody-directed therapy

Breast Cancer is the most common cancer among women globally. Despite significant improvements in overall survival, many tumours are refractory to therapy and so novel approaches are required to improve patient outcomes. We have evaluated patient-derived explants (PDEs) as a novel preclinical platform for breast cancer (BC) and implemented cutting-edge digital pathology and multi-immunofluorescent approaches for investigating biomarker changes in both tumour and stromal areas at endpoint. Short-term culture of intact fragments of BCs as PDEs retained an intact immune microenvironment, and tumour architecture was augmented by the inclusion of autologous serum in the culture media. Cell death/proliferation responses to FET chemotherapy in BC-PDEs correlated significantly with BC patient progression-free survival (p = 0.012 and p = 0.0041, respectively) and cell death responses to the HER2 antibody therapy trastuzumab correlated significantly with HER2 status (p = 0.018). These studies show that the PDE platform combined with digital pathology is a robust preclinical approach for informing clinical responses to chemotherapy and antibody-directed therapies in breast cancer. Furthermore, since BC-PDEs retain an intact tumour architecture over the short-term, they facilitate the preclinical testing of anti-cancer agents targeting the tumour microenvironment.

Time to surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer and its impact on survival in a middle-income country.

e12640 Background: The time to surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer and its impact on survival has not been sufficiently evaluated in low- or middle-income countries. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact on overall survival in a cancer hospital in Guayaquil, Ecuador. Methods: This is a retrospective study carried out at the SOLCA Guayaquil Hospital in Ecuador from January 2009 to December 2011. The inclusion criteria were women ≥18 years old, diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in stages II and III, who were treated with NACT followed by surgery. The data were collected from clinical records; those with incomplete data were excluded, and the variables age, stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and pathological response were included. Survival was grouped into <8 and ≥8 weeks for the comparative analysis. Survival time was calculated from diagnosis by biopsy until death; A p-value of ˂0.05 was taken as significant; The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for overall survival, then the groups were compared by Log Rank, and the influence of the covariates was estimated in the Cox regression model. The data were analyzed in an SPSS v29 statistical program. Results: 200 patients were identified, 195 of whom had all the information for the analysis. The median time between the end of NACT and surgery was 7.57 weeks (range, 2.43-29.14 weeks). In the < 8 and ≥ 8 weeks group, there were 111 and 84 patients, respectively. The clinical characteristics are described in the Table. The median overall survival in the entire cohort was 8.32 years (CI: 6.68-9.96), and for the < 8 and ≥ 8 weeks groups, it was 10.0 and 6.56 years, respectively, with a Log-Rank of 0.031. The follow-up (median) of the entire cohort was 7.54 years (range 0.63 – 10.99 years). The multivariate Cox regression showed that LVI, HR: 2.35 p<0.001; clinical stage III (II vs III), HR: 2.47 p<0.001; residual disease (pathological complete response vs residual disease), HR: 2.70 p=0.012; age ≤ 50 years (≤ 50 years vs > 50 years), HR: 1.69 p=0.011; were factors that statistically contributed to worse survival, however, the time between the end of NACT and surgery < 8 and ≥ 8 weeks (p = 0.07) had no statistical impact on survival. Nonetheless, a numerical trend towards better survival was noted in the < 8 week group. Conclusions: The delay in time to surgery after NACT had a negative trend in survival, although it was not statistically significant, which may be due to the small sample size. [Table: see text]

Efficacy and biomarker analysis of carboplatin plus taxanes neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: A prospective multicenter cohort study.

e12619 Background: The efficacy and survival data of carboplatin plus taxane (anthracycline-free) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) was lack of a large-sample study. The predictive biomarker of efficacy based on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) whole-methylome sequencing (WMS) has not been reported yet. Methods: The prospective multi-center cohort study was conducted in four hospitals of Chinabetween 2016 and 2023. Stage II-III TNBC patients were enrolled to receive NAC of carboplatin (AUC 5) every 3 weeks or carboplatin (AUC 4) every 2 weeks plus taxane(standard dose) for 4-6 cycles. Primary study endpoint were pathological complete response (pCR) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Plasma samples were prospectively collected at baseline (T1) and after NAC(T2). Chromosomal aneuploidy of featured fragments (CAFF),fragment size index (FSI) and methylation density score (MD) of cfDNA were detected with WMS. Results: A total of 267 patients were included in the study. The median age was 49 years, 156 patients (58.4%) were stage III disease. 147 patients (55.1%) received the triweekly NAC. 263 patients underwent breast surgery after NAC and 106 patients (40.3%) achieved pCR. The pCR were similar in biweekly or triweekly groups (39.8% vs 40.7%, P=0.89). The 3-year RFS and overall survival (OS) were 77.9%, 87.6%, respectively. Patients who achieved pCR had a significant better RFS (95.5%) and OS (97.7%) than those non-pCR (76.6%, P<0.001; 81.2%, P<0.001). A total of 66 patients with 120 plasma samples (64 samples at T1, 56 samples at T2) were included in WMS analysis. Patients with CAFF, FSI or MD positive at T1 had a higher tumor burden (stage III or cN2-3, all P values <0.05). The proportion of patients with FSI negative at T2 was significantly higher in pCR group compared to non-pCR(86.2% vs 59.3%, P=0.034). There is a similar tendency in patients with CAFF negative. Patients with MD positive at T1 was significantly associated with poor RFS compared to MD negative (HR = 7.36, 95% CI: 0.93-58.75, Log-rank P=0.028). A linear SVM model based on FSI, CAFF, combining with immune cell (effector memory CD8 T cells, immature B cells) and clinical features was developed to predict pCR, with AUC = 0.90 for training dataset and AUC = 0.86 for testing data. Conclusions: Our large-sample study further confirmed that carboplatin plus taxanes (anthracycline-free) NAC in TNBC is an effective option with clinical applicability. Biomarkers based on cfDNA WMS may offer some predictive and prognostic value which needed to be further investigated.

Estimating benefit from dose dense adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer in the PANTHER randomized phase 3 trial.

521 Background: Adjuvant dose dense chemotherapy for early breast cancer improves patient outcomes across all subgroups compared with standard interval treatment. However, the effect of dose dense treatment based on individual patient risk and over time, and the performance of the PREDICT model at this setting are not well-studied. Methods: This is an exploratory analysis from the phase 3 PANTHER trial (NCT00798070) that compared adjuvant sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel (D) administered in either tailored dose dense (tDD EC/D, every 2 weeks) or standard interval schedule (FEC/D, every 3 weeks) to patients with high-risk resected early breast cancer. Dose tailoring in the experimental arm was performed according to a predefined algorithm based on hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity. We evaluated the performance of PREDICT in terms of calibration and discrimination in the entire cohort and subgroups of interest, conducted a subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) analysis and observed the relative treatment effect over time. Results: The intention-to-treat population consists of n=2003 randomized patients. Median follow-up was 10.3 years (interquartile range, 9.1 – 10.5 years). PREDICT consistently underestimated 5-year (absolute difference 1.4%) and 10-year overall survival (absolute difference 6.6%) in the entire population and across all subgroups, but mostly so in the highest risk patients where the difference between observed and predicted 10-year survival reached 20.4% for patients with tumors larger than 5 cm. Discriminatory accuracy was lower for 10-year than for 5-year survival (AUC 0.728 and 0.786, respectively), although the difference in model performance between the two treatment groups was small. In STEPP analysis, absolute benefit from tDD EC/D in the primary endpoint of breast cancer relapse free survival was stable across risk-defined overlapping subpopulations and ranged from 3.8% in the lowest risk patients to 3.6% in the highest risk ones. There was no evidence of differential treatment effect through time (pinteraction >0.1 for all time-to-event endpoints). Conclusions: In this largely node-positive population, PREDICT consistently overestimated risk for death in all patient subgroups. We could not reliably identify any subgroup not benefiting from dose dense treatment, which should be the standard of care for primary resected high-risk breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT00798070 .

Benefit of perioperative chemotherapy in the patients with loco-regional recurrence of HR-positive HER2-negative breast cancer: A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study.

526 Background: Loco-regional recurrence (LRR) in breast cancer (BC) is addressed with multimodal treatment, yet the prognosis remains unfavorable. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for the hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+HER2-) subtype of BC is controversial. Methods: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study under the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. This study focused on patients without distant metastasis who developed HR+HER2- ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) or other LRR (oLRR) including recurrence in skin, chest wall, or regional lymph nodes. The patients received curative surgery for LRR between 2014 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups: the chemotherapy group and no chemotherapy group before/after LRR. We performed a Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) between the two groups. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using propensity score (PS) matching and IPTW. Results: A total of 967 patients were registered from 41 institutions, and 958 patients concordant with inclusion criteria were analyzed. There were 509 patients (53%) of only IBTR and 449 patients (47%) of oLRR. Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 235 patients (25%), while 722 (75%) did not receive it. Compared to the no-chemotherapy group, the chemotherapy group included a higher number of patients aged 41-60, oLRR, and recurrences during adjuvant endocrine therapy. At a median follow-up of 5.2 years (Interquartile range: 4.1-6.5), the 5-year iDFS rate was 75.4% (95% CI: 72.4-78.2). Multivariate analysis showed an improvement in iDFS for the chemotherapy group (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49-0.99, p = 0.045). Sensitivity analysis also consistently suggested the effectiveness of chemotherapy (PS matching HR 0.76, IPTW HR 0.75). In the subgroup analysis, the chemotherapy group showed more significant iDFS improvement in cases with oLRR, recurrences during adjuvant endocrine therapy for primary BC, and those without perioperative chemotherapy for primary BC. Conclusions: Our study showed improvement in iDFS in patients who received perioperative chemotherapy for HR+HER2- LRR. This improvement was particularly notable in patients with oLRR, recurrences during adjuvant endocrine therapy, and those without perioperative chemotherapy for primary BC. [Table: see text]

Ten-year outcomes of targeted axillary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

600 Background: When pathological complete response (pCR) is achieved in node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), identifying traces of the previous lesion becomes challenging which makes accurate surgery difficult. We conducted targeted axillary surgery (TAS) in node-positive breast cancer after NAC, which involves accurately targeting the lymph nodes where metastasis occurred and performing surgery using a less extensive method. The 10-year outcomes were compared with those of patients who underwent conventional axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 235 patients with cT1-3N1-2 breast cancer who received NAC from 2012 to 2017. In this cohort, 78 patients underwent TAS only, and 157 underwent conventional ALND, including 31 patients who initially received TAS followed by additional ALND. Oncologic results, including locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), were assessed over a 10-year follow-up period. Survival outcomes for all patients and each subtype were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival methods. Results: The TAS group had significantly more postmenopausal patients (p=0.022), and the most common type of breast cancer was invasive ductal carcinoma [TAS: 75 (96.2%); ALND: 157 (100.0%)]. There was no statistical difference in the T stage and the number of lymph nodes suspected of metastasis at diagnosis (p=0.062, 0.985). Mastectomy was performed in 60.3% of patients in the TAS group and 93.0% in the ALND group (p<0.001), and 68 (87.2%) of the TAS group and 41 (26.1%) of the ALND group received additional axillary radiotherapy (p=0.019). There was no significant difference in oncologic outcomes between the TAS and ALND groups in all patients (LRFS, p=0.673; DMFS, p=0.729; OS, p=0.396) and based on subtypes, including hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-positive, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In the HR-positive breast cancer group, the TAS and ALND groups showed very similar trends (LRFS, p=0.954; DMFS, p=0.993; OS, p=0.617). In HER2-positive breast cancer, although not statistically significant, the survival outcomes were better in the TAS group than in the ALND group (LRFS, p=0.967; DMFS, p=0.999; OS, p=0.423). However, the OS in the TAS group for TNBC was lower than that in the ALND group, though not significantly (LRFS, p=0.411; DMFS, p=0.697; OS, p=0.210). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that TAS is comparable to ALND in terms of 10-year oncological outcomes across different types of node-positive breast cancer, suggesting its potential as a viable alternative. However, further research focusing on patient quality of life and postoperative complications is essential to establish TAS as a superior surgical option to ALND.

Impact of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy permanence on patients' preference to discontinue chemotherapy.

12046 Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) diminishes patients’ functional ability and quality of life; approximately 40% of patients experience CIPN symptoms 3 years after treatment. Due to the absence of effective CIPN treatments, ASCO guidelines recommend discontinuing chemotherapy in patients experiencing intolerable CIPN symptoms. Little is known about patient’s preference to continue or discontinue chemotherapy when experiencing CIPN, and whether the potential permanence of CIPN symptoms affects this decision. The objective of this prospective observational study was to determine the effect of CIPN symptom permanence on patients’ preference to discontinue chemotherapy. Methods: Patients receiving taxane and/or platinum chemotherapy for breast or colorectal cancer were enrolled in a prospective observational clinical study. Patients reported their CIPN severity using the EORTC CIPN20 patient-reported outcome questionnaire at the start of each treatment cycle. At the same time, patients were asked if they would prefer to continue or discontinue chemotherapy treatment under the hypothetical scenario that their current CIPN symptoms would be temporary or permanent. A generalized linear mixed effects model was used to determine the effect of CIPN severity, permanence, and other clinical variables on a patient’s decision to discontinue (vs. continue) chemotherapy treatment. Results: A total of 66 patients completed data collection at least one time, of whom 55 (83%) had breast cancer, 12 (18%) had metastatic disease, and 52 (79%) received a taxane. The odds a patient would prefer to discontinue chemotherapy treatment if their CIPN symptoms would be permanent (vs. temporary) were nearly 30 times greater (odds ratio (OR)=30.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 15.73-57.79, p<0.001, Table). There was a statistical trend toward preferring to discontinue chemotherapy treatment as CIPN symptom severity increased (OR=1.09, 95% CI: 1.00-1.19, p=0.063). Conclusions: The potential for CIPN symptoms to be permanent has a huge effect on whether patients want to continue or discontinue chemotherapy treatment. Additional data is needed on the incidence and predictors of permanent CIPN. More importantly, shared decision-making tools that convey the risk of permanent CIPN, and the potential risk of discontinuing chemotherapy treatment, are needed to facilitate patient-centered treatment decisions so that each patient with cancer achieves their personal treatment goals. [Table: see text]

Pathological complete response rate to anthracycline versus non−anthracycline based chemotherapy regimens in localized and regional HER2 neu positive breast cancer.

e12632 Background: Debate over the need of anthracycline as part of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-neu early breast cancer was addressed in many trials with results favoring similar outcomes with or without anthracycline. This was not adopted fully in Saudi Arabia because of concern regarding ethnic differences in response to treatment. We conducted this retrospective analysis to evaluate if there is any difference in pathological complete response rate (PCR) in patients with early HER2-neu positive breast cancer depending on neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Methods: Patients with HER2-neu positive early breast cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare (JHAH) facility between the year 2018 and 2022 were all evaluated for pathological subtype, HER2-neu status and type of neoadjuvant chemotherapy administered. Pathological response status was evaluated in all patients and PCR was measured to see if there was any difference depending on the use of anthracycline (AC) or non-anthracycline (non-AC) based chemotherapy regimen. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, clinical stage, treatments and outcomes were collected via JHAH’s oncology registry. Categorical variables are reported as frequencies and percentages. The association between chemotherapy regimen AC vs non-AC based and PCR was analyzed using Fisher Exact Test. p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were conducted using JMP version 15. Results: In this study 59 HER2-neu positive early breast cancer patients were identified. We examined their clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. Median age was 57. The most prevalent histology was invasive carcinoma of no special type (79.66%), Estrogen receptor positivity was observed in 72.88% of patients, while progesterone receptor positivity was seen in 62.71% of cases. Majority of patients were alive (96.61%) at the time of data collection. There was no significant difference in clinical stage in both groups. The association between chemotherapy type and pathological response was assessed. Among patients receiving AC chemotherapy (n=29), 55.17% achieved PCR, while for patients receiving Non-AC chemotherapy (n=30), the PCR rate was 50%. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.8). Conclusions: In our cohort of HER-neu positive early breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant therapy there seems to be no significant difference in PCR with AC or Non-AC based chemotherapy regimens. This is concordant with the international trends.

Deep learning-based quantitative assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides in triple-negative breast cancer: A prognostic study.

553 Background: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are pivotal in predicting responses to preoperative chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Yet, their clinical adoption as a diagnostic marker is limited by the challenge of achieving high accuracy with objective measures. This study introduces a novel AI-based method to quantitatively assess stromal TILs within the tumor bed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides, examining their correlation with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: In this study, 68 cases of breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis at the time of resection were selected from a total of 3,902 resections conducted between 2002 and 2016. We then developed an AI-based model to detect the epithelium and lymphocytes (CD3/CD20) from H&E-stained slides. This model was trained using annotated datasets, which included 26,509 images of the epithelium and 12,273 images of lymphocytes. The tumor bed areas were precisely defined by pathologists. Subsequently, the AI model identified epithelial and lymphocyte regions within these predefined areas. The TILs score was then calculated as the ratio of the lymphocyte area to the total stromal area within the tumor bed, excluding the epithelial areas identified by the AI model. Finally, we assessed the prognostic significance of the TILs score for DFS and OS through ROC analysis and log-rank tests. Results: ROC analysis identified an optimal TILs score threshold of 0.0042 for both DFS and OS, with an AUC of 0.743 (95% CI, 0.622-0.864) for DFS and 0.686 (95% CI, 0.559-0.812) for OS. This threshold significantly stratified patients into groups with distinct DFS and OS outcomes (P=0.003 and P=0.008, respectively). Conclusions: AI quantification of TILs offers a promising prognostic tool in triple-negative breast cancer, enhancing the objectivity and clinical utility of pathological analyses. Accurate TILs measurement could revolutionize prognostication and treatment planning.

A propensity-matched cohort study of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.

e13134 Background: Preferred neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) regimens for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) include anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane-based chemotherapy. This study compared the efficacy, safety and biomarker exploration of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for early-stage TNBC. Methods: This study included 2 cohorts with different NAT regimens, matched (2:1) according to age, clinical T and N stage, and Ki-67 status. Patients in the immune combination chemotherapy (NIC) cohort were recruited from a phase II clinical trial (NCT04676997). NIC patients received intravenous camrelizumab at a dose of 200mg and simultaneous chemotherapy consisted of platinum-free drugs, or platinum containing drugs. Patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cohort regimen comprised 4 cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, and 4 cycles of epirubicin (90 mg/m2, d1, q2w) + cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2, d1, q2w). The indicators of this study include pCR, breast pCR (bpCR), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) rate, breast conserving surgery (BCS) rate and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) analysis of gene expression profiling. Results: Of 252 eligible patients, 162 patients were identified in the analysis after propensity score matching (PSM). Compared with NAC alone, the addition of camrelizumab brought higher pCR rates (64.81% versus 37.04%, p<0.05), ALND rates (38.89% versus 12.96%, p<0.05) and comparable BCS rates (20.37% versus 15.74%, p<0.05). Gene expression analysis was performed on tumor tissue samples from 12 patients receiving NAC and 16 patients receiving NIC before and after NAT. The results showed that the TIME status of the NIC and NAC groups before treatment was basically the same. Moreover, we respectively compared the TIME status of patients with pCR and non_pCR in NIC and NAC before NAT. The results found that there were 9 significantly different signatures (p<0.05) between pCR and non_pCR patients in the NIC group, and 1 signature (p<0.05) in the NAC group, respectively. Notably, we found 8 signatures (B Cells, CD8 T Cells, TIS, IFN Gamma, Lymphoid, T Cell, APM, Immunoproteasome), that were scored significantly higher only in pCR patients in the NIC group compared with non-pCR patients, and 8 signatures could promote response to immunotherapy. The common difference signature between the two groups is Treg cells. Conclusions: In patients with early-stage TNBC, neoadjuvant treatment with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved pCR with an acceptable safety profile. Differences in TIME may affect response to treatment regimens. Future validation in prospective randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes is needed. Clinical trial information: NCT04676997 .

Pilot evaluation of portable scalp cooling for chemotherapy-associated alopecia in early-stage breast cancer.

12141 Background: Chemotherapy-induced alopecia significantly impacts quality of life (QOL). First-generation scalp cooling systems PAXMAN and Dignicap, while effective in reducing alopecia, are not universally adopted due to their lack of portability. Amma is a second-generation, portable and battery-powered scalp cooling system that offers the opportunity for widespread clinical usage by allowing self-administration and mobility. Here, we report first-in-human outcomes of Amma in a preliminary cohort receiving curative-intent taxane-based chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Methods: We conducted a pilot clinical trial (NCT05508984) of the Amma system at Providence Cancer Institute in Oregon. Key inclusion criteria included: no baseline alopecia [Dean’s scale 0], intent to receive 4-6 cycles of taxane-based, anthracycline-sparing therapy, willingness to participate in quality-of-life questionnaires, and serial scalp photography. The primary outcome was the feasibility of Amma devices for adoption within the clinic ascertained by patient reported outcomes (PRO) and provider feedback. The secondary outcome was efficacy defined as the proportion of subjects achieving < 50% hair loss [Dean’s scale 0-2] at 30 days post-treatment, and tolerability assessed by common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). Results: 14 participants were enrolled and evaluable from 9/2022-1/2024. Participants received docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC x 4, n=10) or weekly paclitaxel/trastuzumab+/- pertuzumab (TH(P), n=4). 93% of participants (n=13/14) successfully completed treatment. One participant discontinued scalp cooling prematurely. Primary efficacy endpoint of <50% hair loss was achieved in 64% participants (n=9/14, [95% CI: 0.39, 0.89]) (TC: n=5/10; TH(P): n=4/4). On the validated “Was it Worth It?” questionnaire, 92% reported the treatment “worthwhile”, 85% would repeat participation, and 100% would recommend it to others. After treatment, 93% reported a similar or increased QOL with participation and 71% deemed the experience “better than expected”, paralleling PRO outcomes from previously published trials using first-generation cooling devices. Provider feedback was favorable regarding feasibility of treatment. Conclusions: Scalp cooling with the portable Amma system was both feasible and effective in this pilot study. Point estimates of efficacy were like those reported for PAXMAN (Dean’s 0-2: 50%) and DigniCap (66%). A follow-up clinical trial is planned with a primary outcome of efficacy in patients receiving taxane-based chemotherapy (NCT06215469, PI: Rugo). Clinical trial information: NCT05508984 .

Preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy with acupuncture, a multinational parallel randomized controlled trials project (PACT).

TPS12156 Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a significant challenge for patients (pts) with breast cancer treated with taxanes and platinum compounds. CIPN severely affects quality of life, leading to paresthesia and pain, and often results in dose modifications and discontinuation of treatment. Although preliminary trials suggest the effectiveness of acupuncture in managing existing symptoms of CIPN, the use of acupuncture to prevent CIPN is not well studied. Prior studies provide inconclusive results, underscoring the need for more rigorous investigation. We designed an international study, PACT, to evaluate the impact of acupuncture on the prevention of CIPN in breast cancer pts who undergo adjuvant or neoadjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy. Methods: PACT is a coordinated multi-national study consisting of three parallel randomized trials in USA, China, and South Korea, using the same inclusion/exclusion criteria, randomization, interventions, and validated measures. PACT is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture in preventing CIPN in pts undergoing taxane-based chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Participants include pts with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer without preexisting neuropathy, scheduled for adjuvant or neoadjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy. Target enrollment is 140 pts from three sites: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (USA) (n=100), Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine (China) (n = 20) and the Daegu Catholic University Medical Center (South Korea) (n=20), randomized (1:1) to the acupuncture arm or a control. The acupuncture arm receives a standardized protocol of 1-2 sessions per week for 12 weeks (total of 14 sessions). The control arm receives relaxation exercises with nature scenery videos for 14 sessions. The follow-up period for both arms is 12 weeks. Main measures include The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CIPN20, QLQ-30 and Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) CIPN items. The primary outcome measure is the change in CIPN severity, assessed using the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 sensory subscale, between baseline and week 12, with secondary outcomes including occurrence of CIPN and maximum CIPN scores, pain, sleep quality, and overall quality of life. A planned pooled analysis of individual patient data will be performed. The ethics review committee of each site has approved the study. Today, 89 (64%) of the planned 140 participants have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT05528263 , ChiCTR2200066714, KCT0008470.

Associations of predictive biomarkers, MHC-I and MHC-II, with clinical and molecular features in a diverse breast cancer cohort.

517 Background: The addition of immunotherapy (IO) to chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has improved survival outcomes and recent studies have also shown improvements in pCR rates in early high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer. However, these improvements are not without toxicities and thus there is a critical need for biomarkers to select patients that are most likely to benefit from immunotherapy. MHC-I and tumor-specific MHC-II (tsMHC-II) expression are candidate biomarkers for predicting PD-(L)1 checkpoint inhibition benefit and have previously shown potential for predicting treatment response in multiple tumor types, including breast cancer. However, the existing data were generated from clinical trials with limited racial/ethnic diversity. Here we report associations between MHC-I and MHC-II expression and clinicopathological features in a large, racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer cohort. Methods: We performed multiplexed immunofluorescent tissue-based analysis of participants in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS). Intrinsic subtype and P53 mutant-like status were identified using RNA-based multigene assays. To evaluate MHC-I we ranked all participants based on tumoral MHC-I intensity, with the top 33% categorized as "MHC-IHigh"; MHC-II+ expression on tumor cells was defined as ≥5% of tumor cells. Association between MHC-I/II and clinicopathological features by race was tested using Chi-square test or fisher-exact test and relative frequency difference (RFD) was calculated. Results: This study included 1630 participants (48% Black and 52% non-Black) with Stage I-III breast cancer. Black participants had a higher incidence of TNBC (25% vs. 12.5%, p=<0.001) and Basal-like (29% vs. 14%, p=<0.001) tumors. Basal-like and TP53 mutant tumors were more frequently observed among Black participants with HR+/HER2- tumors (11% vs. 5.5%, p=0.006 for Basal-like; 26% vs. 17%, p=0.003 for p53 mutant-like). While there was a similar distribution of tsMHC-II+ tumors between Black and non-Black participants, the relative frequency of tsMHC-II+ tumors was significantly more common in Black participants with HR+/HER2- breast cancer compared to non-Black participants (7.9% vs. 5%, p=0.04). Moreover, Black participants also were significantly more likely to have MHC-Ihigh tumors (38.9% vs. 28.4%, p=0.01), which, after IHC subtype stratification, was only significant among participants with HR+/HER2- breast cancer (28.2% vs. 22.3%, p=0.02). Conclusions: In this diverse breast cancer cohort, MHC-I and MHC-II expression, candidate predictive biomarkers of IO benefit, were more prevalent in tumors from Black women with HR+/HER2- breast cancer. These results underscore the importance of diverse and equitable clinical trial enrollment in future IO trials, especially in HR+/HER2- breast cancer.

Real-world immune-related adverse events in patients with early triple negative breast cancer who received pembrolizumab.

1099 Background: The addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-522 regimen) in high risk early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has improved clinical outcomes. However, this treatment can result in immune-related adverse events (irAEs) involving any organ and in some cases, life-long toxicities or even death. This retrospective study describes real-world patterns of irAEs in patients (pts) with early TNBC who received pembrolizumab at two academic centers. Methods: We evaluated irAEs in pts with stage II-III TNBC from MD Anderson Cancer Center and Lyndon B Johnson diagnosed between January 2018 and May 2023 who received neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. We excluded those enrolled on clinical trials. We utilized ASCO irAE and CTCAE v5 guidelines for toxicity grading. Logistic regression assessed the effect of clinical variables on irAEs, adjusting for covariates. Results: We identified 233 pts with a median age of 51 ± 12 years; 62% with stage II and 35% with stage III TNBC; 25% were Hispanic/Latino, 21% non-Hispanic Black and 42% were non-Hispanic White. In total, 80 pts (34%) developed 100 separate irAEs (94 with definite and 6 with possible/probable attribution). The most common irAEs were endocrine (52%) followed by gastrointestinal (23%). Grade ≥ 3 irAE occurred in 26 instances, with the most common being gastrointestinal (13 instances). A fatal irAE occurred in 2 pts where both were colitis. A total of 26 irAEs resulted in hospitalization, 45 required systemic steroids, and 15 required additional immunosuppressive therapy. Most (66) irAEs were unresolved at last follow up, although the majority had improved to grade 1 (37/66) and 32 patients discontinued pembrolizumab early due to irAEs. No clinical factor (race, stage, tumor grade, age, body mass index) was associated with development of an irAE. Conclusions: In this real-world diverse population, we identified a similar rate and severity of irAEs as reported in the KEYNOTE-522 trial. Hospitalizations occurred in 26% of irAEs while most developed persistent immune toxicity. Gastrointestinal irAEs were more common compared to KEYNOTE-522 reported data. Research is needed to better predict and mitigate the burden of irAEs and to improve the long-term survivorship care of pts with early TNBC pts who receive pembrolizumab. [Table: see text]

Predictors of response and surgical approach after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in receptor-positive/HER2-negative stage II-III breast cancer patients treated in two private cancer care centers in Lima, Peru: Real-world data.

e12659 Background: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) is controversial, its main benefit being to improve the surgical outcome in both breast and axilla. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response to NAC, as well as possible predictors and the type surgery performed after primary treatment. Methods: Observational, retrospective study from a database of 1356 consecutive cases of BC between 2016 and 2022 in two private oncology centers in Lima Metropolitana. There were 726 new cases of hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative BC (53.5%), of which those patients with clinical stage II-III who received NAC were considered (n=122, 16.8 % of luminal HER2-negative). Results: The average age of the sample was 46.6 years (range 25-72) with a predominance of luminal B subtype (60.7%) and clinical stage II disease (51.6%), as well as an average delay time to treatment of 33.9 days. Chemotherapy choice was AC every 3 weeks followed by weekly paclitaxel (98.4%). The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was of 16.4% in the breast, 29.1% in the lymph nodes and 13.9% in both. None of the variables studied (age, histologic grade and type, clinical stage, tumor size, number of nodes, hormone receptors, Ki-67 and HER2 low) were predictors of pCR. According to RECIST criteria, tumor shrinking in the breast occurred in the majority of patients (partial and complete response: 86.1%) and eight out of ten patients achieved a tumor size reduction of more than 50%. The rate of mastectomy was 67.2% and radical axillary dissection, 70.5%. Conclusions: In our cohort, we found a pCR rate similar to that reported in the world literature. No predictors of pCR were found. Despite the high proportion of tumor response at breast and node level, the surgical approach was mostly radical. The multidisciplinary BC committee in our setting should be strengthened in order to make better decisions on the surgical approach for patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative stage II-III BC who receive NAC.

Continuous glucose monitoring and rates of hyperglycemia during chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.

e24134 Background: Diabetes (DM) and hyperglycemia (HG) during chemotherapy increase the risk of treatment-related toxicities. The prevalence of HG and daily patterns of HG over the course of chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) are currently unknown. Methods: We conducted a prospective single-arm pilot study of continuous glucose monitoring in patients with ESBC receiving chemotherapy from 12/2020 – 2/2022. Eligibility criteria included: diagnosis of Stage I-III BC, age ≥18, and planned chemotherapy with concurrent corticosteroid supportive care use. Patients were excluded if they were receiving other systemic corticosteroids or insulin. Patients wore FreeStyle Libre Pro continuous glucose monitoring sensors from the time of chemotherapy initiation (± 7 days) through completion. The sensors detected interstitial glucose levels every 15 minutes and were reapplied by the study team every 2-3 weeks. Primary endpoints were: (1) prevalence of HG, defined as number of patients with ≥1 glucose reading ≥140 mg/dL and (2) among those who developed HG, the proportion of time spent hyperglycemic, defined as number of readings ≥140 mg/dL divided by total number of readings. Key secondary endpoints included prevalence of prediabetes (pre-DM) and diabetes (DM) at baseline and changes in A1c from baseline to weeks 12 and 24. The analysis was stratified by baseline A1c (euglycemia [A1c < 5.7%], pre-DM [A1c 5.7%-6.4%], or DM [A1c ≥6.5% and clinical diagnosis of DM prior to study enrollment]). Results: Among 20 evaluable patients, the median age at baseline was 59 (range 34-78) and median body mass index (BMI) was 29.5 kg/m2 (range 19.5-41.6). The most common chemotherapy regimens included docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (25%), weekly paclitaxel ± trastuzumab (20%), paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (15%), docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (15%), and cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil (15%). All 20 patients developed HG. Of 124,165 total readings, 17% were ≥140 mg/dL and mean glucose was 112.7 mg/dL. At baseline, n = 10 were euglycemic, n = 7 had pre-DM, and n = 3 had DM. By cohort, the proportion of time spent hyperglycemic was 3.9% (euglycemia group), 10% (pre-DM group), and 73.3% (DM group) (p < .0001). Mean glucose values were 95.5 mg/dL (euglycemia group), 104.5 mg/dL (pre-DM group), and 183.0 mg/dL (DM group) (p < .0001). Change in mean A1c from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 varied significantly across groups. Conclusions: Among patients receiving chemotherapy for ESBC, we found evidence of HG in all patients, and the proportion of time spent hyperglycemic during chemotherapy varied significantly by baseline A1c. Further interventions should evaluate the benefits of improved glucose control among patients with baseline A1c > 5.7%. Clinical trial information: NCT04473378 .

Correlation of TILs indices generated by visual review and digital computational algorithm with outcomes from preoperative chemotherapy for TNBC in TBCRC 030.

555 Background: Predictive biomarkers for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) are needed. Stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are prognostic and predictive in TNBC, typically scored by visual examination (VE) of H&E stained slides. Evaluation of image-based surrogate signatures for TILs and other immune profiles by computational assessment (CA) of slides may offer greater precision and more comprehensive assessment of the immune microenvironment. This study was designed to evaluate TILs by VE and CA methods and investigate through blinded assessment the predictive capacity of immune activation. Methods: The phase II study TBCRC 030 randomized patients (pts) with BRCA1/2-proficient stage I-III TNBC to cisplatin (C) or paclitaxel (T) NAC, with primary endpoint response at surgery. TILs were visually scored on a continuous scale by a single experienced pathologist on digitized H&E images of pre-treatment core needle biopsies (CNB). CA used the 4D QPOR platform’s statistical physics and tumor biology based algorithm to quantify cell cycle aberrations and microenvironment dynamics including TILs, immune response (IHI), and combined immune response and cell cycle signature (CmbI) as continuous biomarkers from digitized CNB images. Evaluation of TILs by VE and CA were each correlated with response (RCB 0/1) or non-response (RCB 2/3) to NAC. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC) measures and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the predictive performance of each biomarker. Results: Of 139 evaluable pts, 121 had usable data for TILs by both VE and CA (59 received C, 62 received T). Descriptive statistics for biomarkers by response are shown in the Table. Notably TILs score by VE was significantly predictive of response, as was CA CmbI. TILs by VE had OR 1.86 (95% CI 1.24, 2.87, p=0.031) and AUC 0.69 (95% CI 0.57, 0.66), whereas CA CmbI had OR 1.54 (95% CI 1.00, 2.42, p=0.053) and AUC 0.62 (95% CI 0.51, 0.73). CA TILs and IHI were not predictive of response. TILs by VE predicted response to T (OR 2.91 95% CI 1.56, 6.16, p=0.002) but not C (OR 1.22 95% CI 0.67, 2.18 p=0.49). Conclusions: In this analysis of TBCRC 030, VE of baseline TILs and CA CmbI were predictive of response to NAC for TNBC, however CA did not outperform VE. TILs predicted response to specific chemotherapy. Automated computational evaluation of TILs or the broader immune microenvironment is an emerging field which may allow accurate and reproducible assessment of these important biomarkers. Clinical trial information: NCT01982448 . [Table: see text]

Use of chemotherapy and loco-regional therapy for stage IA triple-negative breast cancer and their association with oncologic outcomes: A cancer registry study.

524 Background: We aimed to evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy and loco-regional therapy for stage IA (pT1, pN0) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in a real-world setting. Methods: We identified patients with pT1, pN0 TNBC diagnosed between 2009 and 2021 within the clinical cancer registry of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier statistics and multivariate Cox regression models (adjusted for age, use of chemotherapy, local therapy (breast conserving therapy [breast conserving surgery + radiotherapy] vs. mastectomy), and tumor histologic subtype). Results: A total of 1191 patients with a median follow-up of 43.8 months were identified: 0.9% (11 of 1191) with pT1mi stage, 10.0% (119 of 1191) with pT1a, 24.0% (286 of 1191) with pT1b, and 65.0% (775 of 1191) with pT1c. Use of adjuvant chemotherapy was 9.1% (1 of 11) in pT1mi stage, 41.2% (49 of 119) in pT1a, 66.8% (191 of 286) in pT1b, and 69.8% (541 of 775) in pT1c. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed no significant influence for the use of adjuvant chemotherapy on OS in pT1a and pT1b patients (for pT1a HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.19 to 8.50, for pT1b HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.30) but for patient age in the pT1b group (HR 4.71, 95% CI 2.26 to 9.8, for age ≥70 vs. <70 years). For pT1c patients, there was significant influence for the use of adjuvant chemotherapy on OS (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.8), for local therapy (HR 0.41, 95% 0.25 to 0.69, for breast conserving therapy vs. mastectomy only), and patient age (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.61 to 3.39 for age ≥70 vs. <70 years). Notably, for pT1c patients aged <70years, local therapy (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.69), in favor of breast conserving therapy) but not use of chemotherapy (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.56-2.19) was associated with OS. Conclusions: This data suggests that OS in stage IA TNBC is strongly influenced by local therapy and patient age, but not use of chemotherapy. Larger studies with longer-term follow-up are welcomed to fully inform this discussion.

A commentary on "Clinical efficacy and biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a experimental single-arm phase II clinical trial pilot study".

A commentary on "Clinical efficacy and biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a experimental single-arm phase II clinical trial pilot study".

Clinical and Pathologic Tumor Response Following Response-guided Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally-advanced Breast Cancer in a Tertiary Hospital Breast Center in the Philippines

Clinical and Pathologic Tumor Response Following Response-guided Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally-advanced Breast Cancer in a Tertiary Hospital Breast Center in the Philippines