Breast Cancer Center Research Articles

European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists/Advanced Breast Cancer Global Alliance quality indicators for metastatic breast cancer care

AimsImprovement in the care of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) can only occur if the adequate quality of care is implemented and verified, including access to multidisciplinary, specialised care given in accordance with high-quality guidelines. To this purpose, European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists and the Advanced Breast Cancer Global Alliance joined efforts to develop the first set of quality indicators (QI) specifically for MBC that should be routinely measured and evaluated to ensure that breast cancer centres meet the required standards. MethodsA working group of multidisciplinary European experts in breast cancer met to discuss each identified QI, reporting the definition, the minimum and target standard for breast cancer centres to achieve, and the motivation for selection. The level of evidence was determined according to the short version of the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality classification. ResultsQI to measure access to and involvement in multidisciplinary and supportive care, appropriate pathological characterisation of disease, systemic therapies and radiotherapy were developed with the consensus of the working group. ConclusionsThis is the first effort of a multistep project that aims to have QI for MBC routinely measured and evaluated to ensure that breast cancer centres achieve mandated standards in the care of patients with metastatic disease.

Abstract P6-05-34: Depression and Psychological Distress in Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract Introduction: Patients with breast cancer are at increased risk for depression and suicide compared to the general population. Breast cancer is unique among other cancers in that some treatments aim to decrease levels of estrogen, a hormone that is intricately linked to mood regulation. The trauma of diagnosis, invasive treatments, and hormone dysregulation all possibly contribute to poor mental health outcomes. Understanding risk factors associated with depression and distress are important for timely interventions. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of breast cancer patients seen at Froedtert & MCW Cancer Center Breast Care Clinic between 2019 and 2020. The present study had two aims. The primary aim was to identify breast cancer patient populations at increased risk of depression and psychological distress. Patient populations were distinguished by tumor pathology, patient demographics, and types of treatment interventions. The secondary aim was to identify demographic and clinical variables associated with changes in self-reported distress and depression. Univariate and multivariate analysis of demographic and clinical variables was performed in relation to Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) and The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer scores. Results: Data from 197 patients was analyzed. Patients with a history of depression scored significantly higher on distress screening (mean= 4.4  3.0, p=0.004) versus patients without psychiatric history (mean 2.8  2.9). Patients under 50 years old reported higher levels of distress than patients over 70 years old (p=0.031, beta= -1.0). Self-reported distress declined significantly with increased time from initial diagnosis (p=0.043; p=0.006 at 2 years). Distress was significantly higher prior to initiation of radiation versus during and immediately following therapy (p=0.028). A history of depression, younger age, passage of time, and temporal relationship to radiation treatment were not associated with significant differences in self-reported depression on multivariate analysis. Distress and depression screening scores were not significantly impacted by surgery or chemotherapy (p=0.5; p=0.11 respectively). Conclusion: Patients with a known history of depression and age less than 50 reported significantly higher levels of distress but not depression associated with diagnosis of breast cancer. Distress exhibited a greater downward trend than depression following initiation of oncologic intervention. The results of this study indicate that breast cancer patients are susceptible to significant fluctuations in psychological distress. In contrast, clinically relevant depression screening scores were less frequent and less subject to deviation. Table 1. Multivariate analysis. Citation Format: Kelly R. Cotchett, Adam H. Kelly, Aniko Szabo, Yee Chung Cheng, Sailaja Kamaraju, Christopher Chitambar, Lyndsey Wallace, Lubna N. Chaudhary, John Burfeind. Depression and Psychological Distress in Breast Cancer Patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-05-34.

Abstract P6-02-05: Prevalence of non-BRCA germline pathogenic variants in Mexican women with breast cancer referred for genetic cancer risk assessment

Abstract Background: The prevalence of germline pathogenic variants in Mexican women with breast cancer who met the reference criteria for genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) has been previously reported as close to 20%. However, information regarding the spectrum of gPVs in genes other than BRCA in this population is limited. Methods: This prospective study included Mexican women who were diagnosed with BC and met international criteria for GCRA. Participants were enrolled in the Clinical Cancer Genomics Community Research Network (CCGCRN) registry and at two referral breast cancer centers in Mexico, the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City and at the Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Monterrey. Participants underwent multigene panel testing (MGPT) for 37 cancer susceptibility genes. For this analysis, only the results of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in the index cases were reported. The demographic and molecular characteristics of the variants are described here. Results: From August 2017 to September 2021, 1020 Mexican women with BC underwent MGPT, with a median age at diagnosis of 41 y (range 20-86), of whom 206 (20.2%) were carriers. 208 gPVs were identified with BRCA1/2 representing 70% (145/208) of the gPVs (BRCA1 n=89, BRCA2 n=56). 63 (30%) of gPVs were identified in genes other than BRCA (CHEK2 n=21, PALB2 n=13, TP53 n=7, RAD51C n=5, ATM n=4, NF1 n=3, PTEN n=2, MUTYH homozygous n=2, RAD50 n=1, BRIP1 n=1, CDH1 n=1, NBN n=1, MSH2 n=1 and MSH6 n=1). The recurrent variants previously proposed as founders in the Hispanic population were frequent among those identified in their respective genes: CHEK2 c.707T>C 81% (17/21), PALB2 c.2167_2168delAT 46% (6/13) and BRCA1 del(exons 9-12) 18% (16/89). As a group, the 4 most frequent genes where gPVs were identified (BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 and PALB2) represented 86% (179/208) of the positive results. Conclusion: Among the variants identified in this population of Mexican women with BC, the proportion of gPVs in genes other than BRCA was significant (about 1 out of 3 pts), which justifies the use of MGPT in the assessment of our population. However, a tailored panel (sequencing of BRCA1/BRCA2/CHEK2/PALB2 and MLPA for BRCA1) could be proposed in areas of Mexico with limited medical resources, including the analysis of other genes in selected patients according to clinical suspicion and family history of cancer. Citation Format: Yanin Chavarri-Guerra, Cynthia Villareal Garza, Jose Luis Rodriguez-Olivares, Dione Aguilar-y Mendez, Gregorio Quintero-Beulo, Francisco Gutierrez-Delgado, Josef Herzog, Stephen Gruber. Prevalence of non-BRCA germline pathogenic variants in Mexican women with breast cancer referred for genetic cancer risk assessment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-02-05.

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI for breast cancer staging: detection of additional malignant lesions not seen on conventional imaging

BackgroundContrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is more available than MRI for breast cancer staging but may not be as sensitive in assessing disease extent. We compared CEM and MRI in this setting.MethodsFifty-nine women with invasive breast cancer underwent preoperative CEM and MRI. Independent pairs of radiologists read CEM studies (after reviewing a 9-case set prior to study commencement) and MRI studies (with between 5 and 25 years of experience in breast imaging). Additional lesions were assigned National Breast Cancer Centre (NBCC) scores. Positive lesions (graded NBCC ≥ 3) likely to influence surgical management underwent ultrasound and/or needle biopsy. True-positive lesions were positive on imaging and pathology (invasive or in situ). False-positive lesions were positive on imaging but negative on pathology (high-risk or benign) or follow-up. False-negative lesions were negative on imaging (NBCC < 3 or not identified) but positive on pathology.ResultsThe 59 women had 68 biopsy-proven malignant lesions detected on mammography/ultrasound, of which MRI demonstrated 66 (97%) and CEM 67 (99%) (p = 1.000). Forty-one additional lesions were detected in 29 patients: six of 41 (15%) on CEM only, 23/41 (56%) on MRI only, 12/41 (29%) on both; CEM detected 1/6 and MRI 6/6 malignant additional lesions (p = 0.063), with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 1/13 (8%) and 6/26 (23%) (p = 0.276).ConclusionsWhile MRI and CEM were both highly sensitive for lesions detected at mammography/ultrasound, CEM may not be as sensitive as MRI in detecting additional otherwise occult foci of malignancy.Trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN 12613000684729

Shared-Decision-Making Experiences in Breast Cancer Care with and without Patient Participation in Multidisciplinary Tumor Conferences: A Mixed-Methods-Study.

This study aimed (1) to analyze patients' perceived shared decision-making (SDM) experiences over 4 weeks between patients participating or not in multidisciplinary tumor conferences (MTCs) and (2) to analyze the association of patients' active participation in and organizational variables of MTCs with patients' perceived SDM experience directly after MTC. From the N=317 patients, this observational study included patient surveys, observations, and audio transcripts from MTCs with (N=82) and without (N=145) patient participation in six breast and gynecologic cancer centers. We performed t tests for within- and between-group comparisons and linear regression with "patients' perceived SDM experiences in MTC" as the dependent variable. Patients' perceived SDM experiences increased at 4 weeks after MTC (p<0.001) with lower perceived SDM experiences for participating versus nonparticipating patients (p<0.001). Linear regression showed that the organizational variable "round table seating arrangement" was significantly associated with higher perceived SDM experiences compared with a theater or U-shape arrangement (beta=-0.38, p=0.043; beta=-0.69, p=0.010) directly after MTC. Results provide first insights into patients' perceived SDM experiences in MTCs. SDM in MTCs is associated with organizational variables of MTCs. A round table seating arrangement in MTCs with patient participation seems important for patients' perceived SDM experiences. The relatively low perceived SDM experiences of participating patients directly after MTC indicates room for improvement, eg concerning patient-centered communication.

Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: should we preserve the pectoral fascia? Protocol of a Dutch double blinded, prospective, randomised controlled pilot study with a within-subject design (PROFAS)

IntroductionBilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) in women with a high risk of developing breast cancer has shown to provide the greatest risk reduction. Many surgical guidelines recommend the removal of the...

Safety and effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in real-world settings: first observations from an interdisciplinary breast cancer centre in Germany.

Sacituzumab govitecan has been recently approved by the USFDA and EMA for the treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). We report real-world safety and effectiveness in patients with mTNBC receiving sacituzumab govitecan treatment at a breast cancer centre in Germany. Data from patients who had received sacituzumab govitecan as treatment for mTNBC, in both de novo and relapsed disease, at the Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany, were collected through institutional records. Data were analysed for safety parameters and survival outcomes and reported using descriptive statistics. Patients (N = 43) received a median (range) of 5 (1-28) cycles of sacituzumab govitecan and were followed up for a median of 12.9 months. The most reported adverse events (AEs) of any grade were alopecia (n = 39; 90.7%), diarrhoea (n = 16; 37.2%), fatigue (n = 15, 34.9%), anaemia (n = 15, 34.9%) and neutropenia (n = 14, 32.6%). AEs ⩾ Grade 3 with the highest incidence were neutropenia (n = 12; 27.9%) and diarrhoea (n = 8; 18.6%). In eight (18.6%) patients, dose of sacituzumab govitecan dose was reduced due to patients' clinical condition prior to commencing treatment; in further 17 (39.5%) patients, sacituzumab govitecan dose had to be reduced or treatment interrupted on account of AEs associated with the drug after treatment had commenced. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were calculated to be 5.0and 13.1 months, respectively. The real-world safety and effectiveness profile of sacituzumab govitecan in patients with mTNBC are in line with clinical trial data. Further studies are required to guide optimal use of sacituzumab govitecan against mTNBC, especially in context of management of accompanying AEs.

Prognostic influences of B-cell lymphoma 2-positive expression on late recurrence in breast cancer.

B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) has an antiapoptotic role, however, has resulted in it being a powerful favorable prognostic factor in breast cancer. Several studies revealed BCL2 is strongly associated with a lower rate of early recurrence after initial treatment in breast cancer patients, but study of a prolonged effect after 5 years is lacking. We investigated BCL2 as a prognostic factor in breast cancer in comparison to early and late recurrence. We retrieved data from 2,198 patients with primary breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment and adjuvant treatment at the breast cancer center between 2005 and 2015. Each molecular subtype was classified, and Ki-67 and BCL2 were also assessed by immunohistochemistry. BCL2 and the association between molecular subtypes were assessed in early and late recurrences, respectively. Five-year postrecurrence survival and BCL2 were also assessed. The BCL2-positive group was associated with favorable clinicopathologic characteristics. The time to recurrence was significantly longer in the BCL2-positive group (P = 0.035). Late recurrence after 5 years was higher in the BCL2-positive group (P = 0.029). In multivariate survival analysis, tumor size and BCL2-positive expression were the only independent prognostic factors for late recurrence (P = 0.004). In the patients with recurrence, 5-year postrecurrence survival was significantly higher in the BCL2-positive group (P < 0.001). Our result showed that prognosis was better in BCL2-positive patients compared to BCL2-negative patients at late recurrence. We suggested that BCL2 expression could be used as a marker to help determine additional adjuvant therapy or extended hormone therapy in hormone-dependent breast cancer.

CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Advanced HR+/HER2 – Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Data Analysis

Purpose: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy are considered standard-of-care for first-line therapy of patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative, advanced breast cancer (HR+/HER2- ABC). Superiority of combination therapy over endocrine monotherapy has been demonstrated in a multitude of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in phase III and IV. However, RCTs reflect clinical reality only to a limited extent, as narrow inclusion criteria lead to a selected patient collective. Here, we present real-world data (RWD) on CDK4/6i treatment in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC at four certified German university breast cancer centers. Methods: Patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- ABC who were treated in clinical routine with CDK4/6i between November 2016 and December 2020 at four certified German university breast cancer centers (Saarland University Medical Center, University Medical Center Charité Berlin, University Medical Center Bonn, and University Medical Center Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel) were identified and enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were recorded with particular emphasis on CDK4/6i therapy course [progression-free survival (PFS) following treatment initiation, toxicity, dose reduction, therapy discontinuation, prior and subsequent therapy line]. Results: Data from n = 448 patients were evaluated. The mean patient age was 63 (±12) years. Of these patients, n = 165 (36.8%) were primarily metastasized, and n = 283 (63.2%) had secondary metastatic disease. N = 319 patients (71.3%) received palbociclib, n = 114 patients (25.4%) received ribociclib, and n = 15 patients (3.3%) received abemaciclib, respectively. Dose reduction was performed in n = 132 cases (29.5%). N = 57 patients (12.7%) discontinued the treatment with CDK4/6i due to side effects. N = 196 patients (43.8%) experienced disease progression under CDK4/6i treatment. The median PFS was 17 months. Presence of hepatic metastases and prior therapy lines were associated with shorter PFS, whereas estrogen positivity and dose reduction due to toxicity were positively associated with PFS. Presence of bone and lung metastases, progesterone positivity, Ki67 index, grading, BRCA1/2 and PIK3CA mutation status, adjuvant endocrine resistance, and age did not significantly impact on PFS. Conclusion: Our RWD analysis on CDK4/6i treatment in Germany supports data from RCTs regarding both treatment efficacy and safety of CDK4/6i for treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. In comparison to data from the pivotal RCTs, median PFS was lower but within the expected range for RWD, which could result from inclusion of patients with more advanced diseases (i.e., higher therapy lines) to our dataset.

Comparison of Biosimilar Trastuzumab ABP 980 with Reference Trastuzumab in Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-positive Breast Cancer - an Analysis of a Large University Breast Cancer Centre.

Background ABP980 is a biosimilar antibody to reference trastuzumab (RTZ). Aim of the following study is to confirm the similarity of ABP980 and RTZ in terms of clinical efficacy and safety in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) undergoing neoadjuvant trastuzumab-containing chemotherapy in a clinical real-world situation that also includes patients receiving pertuzumab. Methods Patients with HER2-positive EBC, who were treated from 12/2010 to 03/2020 at the Department of Women's Health at Tuebingen University Hospital, Germany, with at least four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (+/- pertuzumab) in combination with ABP980 or RTZ were included in a retrospective analysis. For efficacy analysis patients achieving a pathologic complete remission (pCR = no invasive tumor in breast and lymph nodes) were compared. Safety was evaluated by comparing the number of patients with a decrease in left ventricular function (LVEF) of >10%. Results 124 patients were included of whom 46 (37.1%) have received ABP980 and 77 (62.9%) were treated with RTZ. A pCR was found in 77 patients (62.1%). For patients treated with ABP980 as compared to RTZ, there was no significant difference regarding efficacy (pCR-rates of 60.9% versus 62.8%, p=0.829) or cardiac safety (LVEF decline in 6.5% versus 2.6%, p=0.274). Conclusion Similarity of ABP980 as compared to RTZ was confirmed in a real-world situation, including a large proportion of patients that have also received pertuzumab treatment.

Implementing and sustaining a breast cancer prospective surveillance rehabilitation program: an institutional perspective.

The prospective surveillance model (PSM) is an evidence-based rehabilitation care delivery model that facilitates functional screening and intervention for individuals undergoing cancer treatment. While PSM is empirically validated and feasible in practice, implementation into cancer care delivery has languished. The purpose of this manuscript is to characterize the barriers and facilitators to implementing PSM in a breast cancer center and to share policy and process outcomes that have sustained the model in practice. The PSM implementation was undertaken as a quality improvement initiative of our cancer center. We retrospectively assessed barriers to implementation and define those according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Implementation strategies are defined based on the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) taxonomy. Breast center policy changes and stakeholder-reported process improvement outcomes at the clinic and system level are described. PSM implementation facilitation was driven primarily by adapting the model to align with the cancer center workflow, engaging interdisciplinary stakeholders as program champions, enhancing knowledge and awareness among cancer care providers, and changing infrastructure to support the model. System and clinic-level policy and process changes included the development of clinical pathways, EHR order sets and automated referrals, new staffing models, and adapted clinical workflows. Our report provides insight on implementing the PSM at a single institution in a cancer care delivery setting. Successful implementation strategies addressed individual, clinic, and system-level barriers and facilitated process and policy changes that have enabled PSM sustainment. Improving integration of rehabilitation services into oncology care has significant implications for survivorship care by enhancing proactive management of functional morbidity. Improving integration of rehabilitation services into oncology care has significant implications for survivorship careby enhancing proactive management of functional morbidity.

Development of Predictive Models for Survival among Women with Breast Cancer in Malaysia.

Prediction of survival probabilities based on models developed by other countries has shown inconsistent findings among Malaysian patients. This study aimed to develop predictive models for survival among women with breast cancer in Malaysia. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients who were diagnosed between 2012 and 2016 in seven breast cancer centres, where their survival status was followed until 31 December 2021. A total of 13 predictors were selected to model five-year survival probabilities by applying Cox proportional hazards (PH), artificial neural networks (ANN), and decision tree (DT) classification analysis. The random-split dataset strategy was used to develop and measure the models' performance. Among 1006 patients, the majority were Malay, with ductal carcinoma, hormone-sensitive, HER2-negative, at T2-, N1-stage, without metastasis, received surgery and chemotherapy. The estimated five-year survival rate was 60.5% (95% CI: 57.6, 63.6). For Cox PH, the c-index was 0.82 for model derivation and 0.81 for validation. The model was well-calibrated. The Cox PH model outperformed the DT and ANN models in most performance indices, with the Cox PH model having the highest accuracy of 0.841. The accuracies of the DT and ANN models were 0.811 and 0.821, respectively. The Cox PH model is more useful for survival prediction in this study's setting.

Impact of cavity shaving on residual tumor rates in patients with primary invasive carcinoma and carcinoma in situ in breast conserving surgery

BackgroundSeveral international studies reported relatively high re-excision rates due to residual tumor in breast conserving surgery (BCS). Cavity shaving (CS) is a surgical strategy to reduce re-excision rates. This study aimed to investigate the effect of circumferential cavity shaving during BCS to reduce residual tumor.Material and MethodsA total of 591 patients with early invasive carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the breast (ICD-10, C50 or D05) who were diagnosed between 01/01/2017 and 31/12/2019 and underwent BCS in a certified breast cancer center of the University Regensburg were analyzed regarding surgical excision methods. Patients with CS during BCS and patients with targeted re-excision in a specific direction depending on the result of intraoperative mammography or sonography during BCS were compared. The risk of pathologic residual tumor (R1) was compared between both groups by means of a multivariable binary logistic regression model to determine if there is a benefit of a certain surgical method to avoid a second intervention for re-excision. We adjusted for age, tumor size, nodal status, histologic type, surgeon, breast side, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Results80 (n = 13.54%) patients had CS and 511 (n = 86.46%) had a targeted re-excision in a specific direction during BCS according to intraoperative mammography or sonography. After comparing both techniques in a multivariable regression model, there was no significant difference regarding risk of residual tumor (p = 0.738) in the total cohort. However, CS showed a tendency to be favorable regarding rates of residual tumor in patients with invasive breast cancer between 60 and 70 years (p = 0.072) and smaller T1-tumors (p = 0.057) compared to targeted intraoperative re-excision following mammographic or sonographic assessment.ConclusionCS showed a tendency to reduce residual tumor compared to the standard technique of intraoperative re-excision in specific subgroups, although no statistical significance was reached. Further studies are needed to overcome potential limitations like surgeon-based bias and missing standardized definitions of CS to reduce residual tumor rates.

Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Service in Sparsely Populated Western Pomerania.

The German Consortium Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC) consists of 23 academic centers striving to provide high-quality regional care for affected individuals and healthy at-risk family members. According to the standard operating procedures defined by the GC-HBOC, a Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center was implemented at the University Medicine Greifswald over a four-year period from 2018 to 2021, despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Genetic analyses were performed in a total of 658 individuals, including 41 males, which paved the way to local annual risk-adapted breast cancer surveillance for 91 women and prophylactic surgery for 34 women in 2021. Our experience in the North Eastern part of Germany demonstrates that it is possible to establish a high-risk breast and ovarian cancer service even in a sparsely populated region. Major facilitators are the interdisciplinary collaboration of dedicated local experts, the support of the GC-HBOC, fruitful clinical and scientific cooperations and the use of technical improvements. As a blueprint, our project report may help to further expand the network of specialized and knowledge-generating care for HBOC families.

Correlation of CT-data derived from multiparametric dual-layer CT-maps with immunohistochemical biomarkers in invasive breast carcinomas

ObjectiveTo examine the correlation of quantitative measurements from material decomposition maps calculated from dual-layer CT (DLCT)-image datasets with immunohistochemical biomarkers of invasive breast carcinomas. Material and MethodsAll patients at the University Breast Cancer Center who underwent a clinically indicated dual-layer CT-scan for staging of invasive ductal breast carcinoma from 01/2016 to 07/2020 were prospectively included. Iodine concentration maps and maps of the effective atomic numbers (Zeffective) were reconstructed from the image datasets. ROI-based evaluations of the index tumors and predefined references tissues for normalization were performed semi-automatically in identical anatomical positions using dedicated evaluation software. Statistical analysis was essentially descriptive using Spearmańs rank correlation and (multivariable) partial correlation. ResultsBivariate showed statistically significant correlations of iodine contents (r = -0.154/-0.202/0.180, p = 0.039/0.006/0.015), and Zeffective-values (r = -0.158/-0.199/0.179, p = 0.034/0.007/0.016) for all 184 carcinomas and the subgroup of 168 invasive ductal carcinomas. The results were confirmed by multivariate analyses with “age”, “diameter” and “ACR-grade” as possible confounders. Normalization of the measured target values with those in the aorta confirmed significant correlations of iodine content and Zeffective compared to Estrogen (r = 0.174, p = 0.019), Progesteron (r = 0.168/0.177, p = 0.024/0.017), and HER2 receptor expression (r = -0.222/-0.184, p = 0.003/0.013). All CT-parameters showed significant correlations with immunohistochemical subtyping (r = 0.191/0.192, p = 0.010). ConclusionsOur preliminary results indicate that iodine content and Zeffective-values derived from DLCT-examinations correlate with hormone receptor expression in invasive breast carcinomas. Assignments to benign entities already seam feasible in clinical routine CT-diagnostics. After further investigations iodine content and Zeffective may be translated as diagnostical and prognostical biomarkers into clinical routine in the long term.

Health state utility differed systematically in breast cancer patients between the EORTC QLU-C10D and the PROMIS Preference Score

Background and ObjectivesThe EORTC Quality of Life Utility Core 10 Dimensions (QLU-C10D) and the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Preference Score (PROPr) are new health state utility (HSU) scores for quality-adjusted life years in cost-effectiveness analyses. Both are expected to measure HSU more comprehensively than existing measures in cancer patients by including cancer-related health domains such as fatigue. The aim of this study is to compare both scores in a sample of breast cancer patients. MethodsWe collected QLU-C10D and PROPr from 291 patients 90 days after treatment in the outpatient clinic of the breast cancer center at Charité - University Medicine Berlin between June 2018 and April 2021. We assessed both scores’ convergent and known-groups validity, agreement, and ceiling and floor effects. ResultsThe mean QLU-C10D score [0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69–0.74] and the mean PROPr score (0.43, 95% CI 0.41–0.46) differed systematically (0.28, 95% CI 0.27–0.30) and showed fair agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.46, 95% CI 0.32–0.57). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79–0.86). Both scores showed similar discrimination across known groups of age, treatment, cancer stage, marital status, and education. The QLU-C10D showed relevant ceiling effects. ConclusionQLU-C10D and PROPr measure HSU differently as a result of different utility models. The choice between QLU-C10D and PROPr should be informed by context, population, disease, and treatment.

Optimized process quality in certified breast centers through adherence to stringent diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms effects of structural as well as socio-demographic factors on start of therapy

PurposeAn increasing incidence of breast cancer can be observed worldwide. Since a delay of therapy can have a negative impact on prognosis, timely cancer care is an important quality indicator. By receiving treatment at a certified breast cancer center, the patient has the best chance of treatment in accordance with guidelines and the best prognosis. The identification of risk factors for a delay of therapy is of central importance and should be the basis for a continuous optimization of treatment at breast cancer centers.MethodsThis retrospective study included women with breast cancer (primary diagnosis, relapse, or secondary malignancy) at the University Hospital Würzburg in 2019 and 2020. Data were retrieved from patients’ records. Correlations and regression analyses were performed to detect potential risk factors for treatment delay.ResultsPatients who received the histological confirmation of breast cancer at an external institution experienced a later therapy start than those patients who received the histological confirmation at the University Hospital Würzburg itself. (35.7 vs. 32.2 days). The interval between histological confirmation and the first consultation at the University Hospital Würzburg correlated statistically significant with age, distress and distance to the hospital.ConclusionPatients with an in-house diagnosis of breast cancer are treated more quickly than those whose diagnosis was confirmed in an external institution. We identified factors such as increased age, greater distance to the hospital as well as increased distress to prolong the time until start of oncological treatment. Intensified patient care should be offered to these subgroups.

Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences in breast and gynecological cancer care: How patient-centered is the communication?

Patients' participation is part of patient-centeredness, but it is so far unclear whether providers in multidisciplinary tumor conferences (MTCs) with patient participation communicate in a patient-centered way. Our aim is to explore (a) to what extent providers ask questions to breast and gynecological cancer patients during case discussion in MTCs, (b) how providers respond to patients' expressions of emotions during case discussions, and (c) which patient- and context-related characteristics and responses are associated with patients' trust in the treatment team after the case discussion. This observational study included survey data and audio recordings of MTCs with patient participation at three breast and gynecological cancer centers. Providers' questions to patients and responses to patients' emotional expressions were coded using the Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences. The response can be explicitly or non-explicitly related to the emotion and space-reducing or space-providing. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine associations between providers' responses, patient- and context-related characteristics, and patients' trust in the treatment team after the case discussion. We analyzed 82 case discussions (77 breast, 5 breast and gynecological cancer patients). Providers asked a total of 646 questions, of which 86% were polar (yes/no). Providers gave 303 responses to a total of 230 emotional expressions by patients. Non-explicit responses were associated with more trust when they were space-providing, but with less trust when space-reducing. The frequency of providers' closed questions and space-reducing responses to emotions shows that patient-centered communication rarely takes place in MTCs with patient participation.

Bracketed Localization in Breast-Conserving Surgery: Indications and Success Rates From a Single, High Volume, Academic Breast Cancer Center.

Bracketed localization is a technique used to help localize lesions for breast-conserving surgery (BCS). To date, there are no guidelines for when bracketed localization should be used in clinical practice. Based on our experience, we aim to provide criteria that should prompt surgeons to consider bracketing. A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent bracketed localization for BCS between 2015 and 2021. Lesion characteristics were recorded including lesion span, number of lesions, histology type on core needle biopsy and surgical specimen, margin status, and need for additional surgery. One hundred and thirteen cases were analyzed. Imaging showed an average lesion span of 5.0-cm. Multifocal lesions represented 45% of cases. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was a histological component in 64% of core needle biopsies and 76% of surgical specimens. Negative margins were achieved in 82% of patients on the first excision. Additional surgery was performed in 17% of patients. Invasive lobular carcinoma had the highest additional surgery rate at 23%. Negative margins with BCS were achieved in 96% of cases, including those with successful re-excision. This descriptive study shows that bracketed localization was most often employed for patients with large lesion spans, multifocality, and a DCIS or invasive lobular component. While these characteristics are typically associated with higher rates of positive margins, our cohort's rate of additional surgery was comparable to the national average for all BCS operations. These results argue that surgeon utilization of bracketed localization may be beneficial in these clinical scenarios.

The impact of a ransomware cyber attack on a breast cancer center.

e13620 Background: On the 14th of May 2021 the Irish Health Service Executive (HSE) was the victim of a “Conti” ransomware attack. The HSE is a nationwide organization providing Ireland’s public health service, consisting of approximately 4000 locations and more than 70,000 connected devices. The study aim is to quantify the impact of the cyber attack by examining the effect on the Breast Cancer services at Cork University Hospital 1 of 8 national cancer centres &amp; 1 of 54 HSE acute hospitals. Methods: New patient referrals through the weekly Breast cancer MDT meeting were used as the study nidus. Patient referrals &amp; key performance indexes for a period of 4 weeks prior, during &amp; after the attack were examined. Time was the key metric examined. Results: The attack triggered a Critical Incident Protocol, resulting in the switching off of all HSE IT systems at national level. Disruption to patient care &amp; operations within the HSE was immediate &amp; without warning. Initially encrypted messaging groups were established to facilitate communication &amp; paper based tracking &amp; data management logs were created. Diagnostics, scheduling &amp; radiotherapy services were most severely affected. The attack resulted in the immediate shut down of the hospitals radiotherapy department with all new treatments transferred off site to a private facility, ongoing treatments delayed, replanned or rescheduled. The effect on the radiology department was catastrophic, all outpatient &amp; non-urgent scans were cancelled. Digital report &amp; image stores were unavailable. Historic imaging &amp; ongoing emergency imaging was unavailable. Taking 7 months to restore impacted data storage &amp; to ensure accurate capture of all reports for examinations during the cyber downtime. The average time from surgery to completed pathology went from 7.04 to 15.03 &amp; 11.8 days in the 4 weeks prior, during &amp; after the attack respectively. Services that were least impacted during the IT outage were those that relied on paper records including chemotherapy administration. The average time from biopsy report to up front surgery decreased from 21.75 to 17 &amp; 14 days in the 4 weeks prior, during &amp; after the attack respectively. Likely due to the increased availability of theatre time, as all non cancer related elective procedures were cancelled. There was little effect on the time from MDT discussion to review by medical oncology, taking an average of 6, 5.7 &amp; 5.8 days in the 4 weeks prior, during &amp; after the attack respectively. The majority of new referrals to the service being seen off site in a satellite clinic &amp; infusion unit that relied on a paper based booking system prior to the attack. Conclusions: The cyber attack had significant disruptive effects lasting months. The impact on patient outcome due to delayed or interrupted treatment will take years to clarify. The attack was facilitated by the presence of multiple, fragmented IT platforms &amp; demonstrated a lack of preparedness in the system which needs to be addressed to prevent recurrence.