Breaks In Yeast Research Articles

The Chromatin Landscape around DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Yeast and Its Influence on DNA Repair Pathway Choice

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are harmful DNA lesions, which elicit catastrophic consequences for genome stability if not properly repaired. DSBs can be repaired by either non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). The choice between these two pathways depends on which proteins bind to the DSB ends and how their action is regulated. NHEJ initiates with the binding of the Ku complex to the DNA ends, while HR is initiated by the nucleolytic degradation of the 5'-ended DNA strands, which requires several DNA nucleases/helicases and generates single-stranded DNA overhangs. DSB repair occurs within a precisely organized chromatin environment, where the DNA is wrapped around histone octamers to form the nucleosomes. Nucleosomes impose a barrier to the DNA end processing and repair machinery. Chromatin organization around a DSB is modified to allow proper DSB repair either by the removal of entire nucleosomes, thanks to the action of chromatin remodeling factors, or by post-translational modifications of histones, thus increasing chromatin flexibility and the accessibility of repair enzymes to the DNA. Here, we review histone post-translational modifications occurring around a DSB in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their role in DSB repair, with particular attention to DSB repair pathway choice.

When the Ends Justify the Means: Regulation of Telomere Addition at Double-Strand Breaks in Yeast.

Telomeres, repetitive sequences located at the ends of most eukaryotic chromosomes, provide a mechanism to replenish terminal sequences lost during DNA replication, limit nucleolytic resection, and protect chromosome ends from engaging in double-strand break (DSB) repair. The ribonucleoprotein telomerase contains an RNA subunit that serves as the template for the synthesis of telomeric DNA. While telomere elongation is typically primed by a 3′ overhang at existing chromosome ends, telomerase can act upon internal non-telomeric sequences. Such de novo telomere addition can be programmed (for example, during chromosome fragmentation in ciliated protozoa) or can occur spontaneously in response to a chromosome break. Telomerase action at a DSB can interfere with conservative mechanisms of DNA repair and results in loss of distal sequences but may prevent additional nucleolytic resection and/or chromosome rearrangement through formation of a functional telomere (termed “chromosome healing”). Here, we review studies of spontaneous and induced DSBs in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae that shed light on mechanisms that negatively regulate de novo telomere addition, in particular how the cell prevents telomerase action at DSBs while facilitating elongation of critically short telomeres. Much of our understanding comes from the use of perfect artificial telomeric tracts to “seed” de novo telomere addition. However, endogenous sequences that are enriched in thymine and guanine nucleotides on one strand (TG-rich) but do not perfectly match the telomere consensus sequence can also stimulate unusually high frequencies of telomere formation following a DSB. These observations suggest that some internal sites may fully or partially escape mechanisms that normally negatively regulate de novo telomere addition.

Emerging non-canonical roles for the Rad51-Rad52 interaction in response to double-strand breaks in yeast.

DNA double-strand break repair allows cells to survive both exogenous and endogenous insults to the genome. In yeast, the recombinases Rad51 and Rad52 are central to multiple forms of homology-dependent repair. Classically, Rad51 and Rad52 are thought to act cooperatively, with formation of the functional Rad51 nucleofilament facilitated by the mediator function of Rad52. Several studies have now identified functions for the interaction between Rad51 and Rad52 that are independent of the mediator function of Rad52 and affect a seemingly diverse array of functions in de novo telomere addition, global chromosome mobility following DNA damage, Rad51 nucleofilament stability, checkpoint adaptation, and microhomology-mediated chromosome rearrangements. Here, we review these functions with an emphasis on our recent discovery that the Rad51-Rad52 interaction influences the probability of de novo telomere addition at sites preferentially targeted by telomerase following a double-strand break (DSB). We present data addressing the prevalence of sites within the yeast genome that are capable of stimulating de novo telomere addition following a DSB and speculate about the potential role such sites may play in genome stability.

Frequency of DNA end joining in trans is not determined by the predamage spatial proximity of double-strand breaks in yeast

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are serious genomic insults that can lead to chromosomal rearrangements if repaired incorrectly. To gain insight into the nuclear mechanisms contributing to these rearrangements, we developed an assay in yeast to measure cis (same site) vs. trans (different site) repair for the majority process of precise nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). In the assay, the HO endonuclease gene is placed between two HO cut sites such that HO expression is self-terminated upon induction. We further placed an additional cut site in various genomic loci such that NHEJ in trans led to expression of a LEU2 reporter gene. Consistent with prior reports, cis NHEJ was more efficient than trans NHEJ. However, unlike homologous recombination, where spatial distance between a single DSB and donor locus was previously shown to correlate with repair efficiency, trans NHEJ frequency remained essentially constant regardless of the position of the two DSB loci, even when they were on the same chromosome or when two trans repair events were put in competition. Repair of similar DSBs via single-strand annealing of short terminal direct repeats showed substantially higher repair efficiency and trans repair frequency, but still without a strong correlation of trans repair to genomic position. Our results support a model in which yeast cells mobilize, and perhaps compartmentalize, multiple DSBs in a manner that no longer reflects the predamage position of two broken loci.

Processing of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Yeast.

Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) intermediates are essential for homology-dependent repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and for the DNA damage response. Here we describe methods routinely used to identify ssDNA intermediates formed by end processing of site-specific DSBs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These methods have been applied in other model systems and human cell lines, and are useful tools to gain insight into the enzymes that process DSBs and how they are regulated.

Rif1 maintains telomeres and mediates DNA repair by encasing DNA ends.

In yeast, Rif1 is part of the telosome, where it inhibits telomerase and checkpoint signaling at chromosome ends. In mammalian cells, Rif1 is not telomeric, but it suppresses DNA end resection at chromosomal breaks, promoting repair by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). Here, we describe crystal structures for the uncharacterized and conserved ∼125-kDa N-terminal domain of Rif1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Rif1-NTD), revealing an α-helical fold shaped like a shepherd's crook. We identify a high-affinity DNA-binding site in the Rif1-NTD that fully encases DNA as a head-to-tail dimer. Engagement of the Rif1-NTD with telomeres proved essential for checkpoint control and telomere length regulation. Unexpectedly, Rif1-NTD also promoted NHEJ at DNA breaks in yeast, revealing a conserved role of Rif1 in DNA repair. We propose that tight associations between the Rif1-NTD and DNA gate access of processing factors to DNA ends, enabling Rif1 to mediate diverse telomere maintenance and DNA repair functions.

Recombination revealed by mapping tails

Cell Division Meiosis is a specialized double cell division that generates haploid gametes from diploid parent cells. Meiotic recombination between homologous chromosomes ensures the proper segregation of chromosomes to the daughter cells. Mimitou et al. carried out a genome-wide survey of resection of the ends of DNA double strand breaks in yeast. Resection generates single-stranded tails that are vital for meiotic recombination. The Tel1 kinase promoted initiation of resection. Nucleosomes, which normally package DNA, needed to be disassembled to allow rapid and efficient resection. Science, this issue p. [40][1] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aak9704

A global view of meiotic double-strand break end resection.

DNA double-strand breaks that initiate meiotic recombination are exonucleolytically processed. This 5'→3' resection is a central, conserved feature of recombination but remains poorly understood. To address this lack, we mapped resection endpoints genome-wide at high resolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Full-length resection requires Exo1 exonuclease and the DSB-responsive kinase Tel1, but not Sgs1 helicase. Tel1 also promotes efficient and timely resection initiation. Resection endpoints display pronounced heterogeneity between genomic loci that reflects a tendency for nucleosomes to block Exo1, yet Exo1 also appears to digest chromatin with high processivity and at rates similar to naked DNA in vitro. This paradox points to nucleosome destabilization or eviction as a defining feature of the meiotic resection landscape.

Sequencing Spo11 Oligonucleotides for Mapping Meiotic DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Yeast.

Meiosis is a specialized form of cell division resulting in reproductive cells with a reduced, usually haploid, genome complement. A key step after premeiotic DNA replication is the occurrence of homologous recombination at multiple places throughout the genome, initiated with the formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) catalyzed by the topoisomerase-like protein Spo11. DSBs are distributed non-randomly in genomes, and understanding the mechanisms that shape this distribution is important for understanding how meiotic recombination influences heredity and genome evolution. Several methods exist for mapping where Spo11 acts. Of these, sequencing of Spo11-associated oligonucleotides (Spo11 oligos) is the most precise, specifying the locations of DNA breaks to the base pair. In this chapter we detail the steps involved in Spo11-oligo mapping in the SK1 strain of budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, from harvesting cells of highly synchronous meiotic cultures, through preparation of sequencing libraries, to the mapping pipeline used for processing the data.

A region in the dystrophin gene major hot spot harbors a cluster of deletion breakpoints and generates double‐strand breaks in yeast

Deletions within the dystrophin gene (DMD) account for >70% of mutations leading to Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies (DMD and BMD). Deletion breakpoints were reported to be scattered within regions that also represent meiotic recombination hot spots. Recent studies indicates that deletion junctions arise from nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), a major pathway for repairing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in mammals. Here we show that a region in intron 47 (i.e., a major deletion hot spot in the DMD gene) generates DSBs during meiosis in yeast and harbors a cluster of previously sequenced deletion breaks. Mapping of breakpoints in 26 BMD/DMD patients indicated that the frequency of breakpoint occurrence around this region is 3-fold higher than expected by chance. These findings suggest that DSBs mediate deletion formation in intron 47 and possibly account for the high frequency of meiotic recombination in the region. Statistical analysis indicated the presence of at least one other breakpoint cluster in intron 47. Taken together, these results suggest that the primary events in deletion formation occur within discrete regions and that the scattered breakpoint distribution reflects both a variable degree of DSB end processing and the availability of a small (compared to the huge regions involved) deletion junction sample.

Cohesins and breaks in yeast

A protein that holds DNA together is also needed to break it apart. Chad Ellermeier and Gerald Smith (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA) show that the DNA glue cohesin regulates meiotic double-strand break (DSB) formation and recombination in fission yeast. The cohesins that hold sister chromatids together during meiosis, called Rec8 and Rec11, are early arrivals on chromosomes during premeiotic replication. They provide a binding site for Rec10, which is a main component of linear elements—fission yeast's version of synaptonemal complexes. Ellermeier and Smith found that deletion of Rec8 and Rec11 caused region-specific decreases in DSB formation and recombination. Loss of Rec10 blocked breakage and recombination throughout the genome. The team thinks the widespread problems in Rec10 occur because it must be present to bring in the enzyme that actually clips the DNA, called Rec12. Rec8 and Rec11, by contrast, are not evenly distributed over the meiotic chromosomes, and thus their absence only causes intermittent problems. “It is surprising that cohesins, which hold sister chromatids together, are so important in recombination,” says Smith, “because cross-overs occur between homologues.” But the ordered loading process explains the puzzle. Cohesins are the first to load onto the meiotic chromosomes and must be there for the rest of the events to follow. Reference: Ellermeier, C., and G.R. Smith. 2005. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. doi:10.1073pnas.0504805102. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Repair of cellular radiation damage in space under microgravity conditions

The influence of microgravity on the repair of x-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks was studied in the temperature-conditional repair mutant rad54-3 of diploid yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cells were exposed on the ground and kept at a low temperature until microgravity conditions were achieved. In orbit, they were incubated at the permissive temperature to allow repair. Before re-entry they were again cooled down and kept at a low temperature until final analysis. The experiment, which was flown on the shuttle Atlantis on flight STS-76 (SMM-03), showed that repair of pre-formed DNA double-strand breaks in yeast is not impaired by microgravity.

Synthesis and biological activity of (hydroxymethyl)- and (diethylaminomethyl)benzopsoralens.

Some benzopsoralens, carrying a hydroxymethyl or a diethylaminomethyl group at the 3, 5, 8, and 11 positions, were prepared, and their biological activity was compared with that of 4-(hydroxymethyl)benzopsoralen (BP). 5-(Hydroxymethyl)benzopsoralen (7b), 11-(hydroxymethyl)benzopsoralen (7c), and 11-(diethylaminomethyl)benzopsoralen (8c) induced marked antiproliferative effects in mammalian cells by simple incubation in the dark; this activity appeared to be related to their ability to inhibit topoisomerase II. Benzopsoralens appeared to be more active, especially BP and 7c, upon UVA activation. Compounds carrying a methyl group at the 4 position together with a hydroxymethyl or diethylaminomethyl at the 8 position (7d and 8d, respectively) were also effective, although to a lower extent; instead, a substituent at the 3 position canceled all activity. Benzopsoralens did not induce interstrand cross-links in DNA in vitro, as seen in the induction of cytoplasmic <<petite>> mutations and double-strand breaks in yeast. This behavior is also compatible with their low mutagenic activity in E. coli WP2 and with the absence of any phototoxicity on the skin. For these features, benzopsoralens seem to be interesting potential drugs for PUVA photochemotherapy and photopheresis. The activity shown in the dark is not sufficient for their possible use as antitumor drugs, but it does offer a new model for the study of topoisomerase inhibitors.

Relocalization of Telomeric Ku and SIR Proteins in Response to DNA Strand Breaks in Yeast

Telomeric TG-rich repeats and their associated proteins protect the termini of eukaryotic chromosomes from end-to-end fusions. Associated with the cap structure at yeast telomeres is a subtelomeric domain of heterochromatin, containing the silent information regulator (SIR) complex. The Ku70/80 heterodimer (yKu) is associated both with the chromosome end and with subtelomeric chromatin. Surprisingly, both yKu and the chromatin-associated Rap1 and SIR proteins are released from telomeres in a RAD9-dependent response to DNA damage. yKu is recruited rapidly to double-strand cuts, while low levels of SIR proteins are detected near cleavage sites at later time points. Consistently, yKu- or SIR-deficient strains are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents. The release of yKu from telomeric chromatin may allow efficient scanning of the genome for DNA strand breaks.

DNA annealing by RAD52 protein is stimulated by specific interaction with the complex of replication protein A and single-stranded DNA.

Homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends critically on RAD52 function. In vitro, Rad52 protein preferentially binds single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), mediates annealing of complementary ssDNA, and stimulates Rad51 protein-mediated DNA strand exchange. Replication protein A (RPA) is a ssDNA-binding protein that is also crucial to the recombination process. Herein we report that Rad52 protein effects the annealing of RPA-ssDNA complexes, complexes that are otherwise unable to anneal. The ability of Rad52 protein to promote annealing depends on both the type of ssDNA substrate and ssDNA binding protein. RPA allows, but slows, Rad52 protein-mediated annealing of oligonucleotides. In contrast, RPA is almost essential for annealing of longer plasmid-sized DNA but has little effect on the annealing of poly(dT) and poly(dA), which are relatively long DNA molecules free of secondary structure. These results suggest that one role of RPA in Rad52 protein-mediated annealing is the elimination of DNA secondary structure. However, neither Escherichia coli ssDNA binding protein nor human RPA can substitute in this reaction, indicating that RPA has a second role in this process, a role that requires specific RPA-Rad52 protein interactions. This idea is confirmed by the finding that RPA, which is complexed with nonhomologous ssDNA, inhibits annealing but the human RPA-ssDNA complex does not. Finally, we present a model for the early steps of the repair of double-strand DNA breaks in yeast.

Covalent protein-DNA complexes at the 5' strand termini of meiosis-specific double-strand breaks in yeast.

During meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the first chemical step in homologous recombination is the occurrence of site-specific DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In wild-type cells, these breaks undergo resection of their 5' strand termini to yield molecules with 3' single-stranded tails. We have further characterized the breaks that accumulate in rad50S mutant stains defective in DSB resection. We find that these DSBs are tightly associated with protein via what appears to be a covalent linkage. When genomic DNA is prepared from meiotic rad50S cultures without protease treatment steps, the restriction fragments diagnostic of DSBs selectively partition to the organic-aqueous interphase in phenol extractions and band at lower than normal density in CsCl density gradients. Selective partitioning and decreased buoyant density are abolished if the DNA is treated with proteinase K prior to analysis. Similar results are obtained with sae2-1 mutant strains, which have phenotypes identical to rad50S mutants. The protein is bound specifically to the 5' strand termini of DSBs and is present at both 5' ends in at least a fraction of breaks. The stability of the complex to various protein denaturants and the strand specificity of the attachment are most consistent with a covalent linkage to DSB termini. We propose that the DSB-associated protein is the catalytic subunit of the meiotic recombination initiation nuclease and that it cleaves DNA via a covalent protein-DNA intermediate.

2-Deoxy-d-glucose Inhibits Rejoining of Radiation-induced DNA Double-strand Breaks in Yeast

Effects of 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) on radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (dsb) have been studied under non-growth conditions in a respiratory-deficient strain of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Velocity sedimentation in neutral sucrose gradients was used to measure DNA dsb. Addition of 2-DG to the liquid-holding medium (67 mM phosphate buffer, pH 5, 30 degrees C) at an equimolar concentration with glucose (50 mM) reduced the rate and extent of dsb rejoining. The inhibition of rejoining mediated by 2-DG is reversible for the majority--but not all--of the radiation-induced dsb.

Heavy ion-induced DNA double-strand breaks in yeast.

DNA double-strand break (dsb) induction in diploid yeast was measured by neutral sucrose sedimentation after exposure to very heavy ions with values of linear energy transfer (LET) ranging from about 300 to 11500 ke V/microns. Linear fluence dependencies were found in all cases from which dsb production cross-sections (sigma dsb) could be calculated. Corresponding cross-sections for cell killing (sigma i) were derived from final slopes of survival curves measured in parallel and for the same fluence range. A close correlation was found between sigma i and sigma dsb. It is calculated that over the entire LET range, including 30 MeV electron irradiation, about 22 dsb are induced per lethal event when high exposures are considered.

Role of the CDC8 gene in the repair of single strand breaks in DNA of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

It has been found that the repair of single strand breaks is defective in the DNA replication mutants cdc8-1 and cdc8-3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae both in permissive (23 degrees C) and restrictive conditions (36 degrees C). In permissive conditions we observed a significant delay in single strand break repair in a diploid strain HB7 (cdc8-1/cdc8-1), as compared with the wild-type strain. Under restrictive conditions no repair was observed, but rather degradation of MMS-damaged DNA occurred. It has been also found that the repair of single strand breaks in yeast is inhibited by cycloheximide but not by hydroxyurea.

Double-strand breaks stimulate alternative mechanisms of recombination repair

To test the double-strand break repair model, we used HO nuclease to introduce double-strand breaks at several sites along a yeast chromosome containing duplicated DNA. Depending on the configuration of the double-strand break and recombining markers, different spectra of recombinant products were observed. Different repair kinetics and recombinant products were observed when a double-strand break was introduced in unique or duplicated DNA. The results of this study suggest that double-strand breaks in yeast stimulate recombination by several mechanisms, and we propose an alternative mechanism for double-strand break-induced gene conversion that does not depend on direct participation of the broken ends.