Acoustic Emission (AE) is a well established NDT method which is used more and more for continuous monitoring, heading towards SHM. Today, AE sensors in the field are tested with a pencil lead break test (Hsu-Nielsen source), which requires manual interaction. Sensors are replaced if the sensitivity is too low. However, since the test is performed on the monitored structure, the structure itself may influence the test. Therefore, a detailed check of the sensor in the lab, according to SE02 and ISO 24543, is done afterwards. An automated solution, that can test AE sensors in the field, without human interaction, that needs minimal additional hardware would benefit AE based monitoring systems. The electromechanical impedance (EMI) spectrum is mostly used for local damage detection with piezoelectric transducers. In the past it has been shown that the EMI spectrum can also be used to enable automated self-diagnostic capabilities in the low frequency spectrum (Park et al., 2004) and in the higher frequency regime (Mueller, 2017) including the eigenfrequencies of the transducers. The usage of EMI for AE sensors can, thorough research in this matter provided, solve the issues mentioned above. This work presents results of EMI spectrum analysis of two sets of 12 and 17 sensors, respectively, with different levels of damage from pressure vessel burst tests. The results are compared to that of a face-2-face inspection, which is an established method of verification in the lab according to ISO 24543. It is shown that the EMI spectrum is capable of similar self-diagnostic capabilities. Thus, combining the advantages of global monitoring with AE sensors, while providing a remote and automatic method of self-diagnostic of AE sensors at any point with minimal additional hardware and software requirements.
Read full abstract