BRCA1 Mutation Research Articles

Genomic landscape of early-stage prostate adenocarcinoma in Mexican patients: an exploratory study

BackgroundHealth disparities have been highlighted among patient with prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) due to ethnicity. Mexican men present a more aggressive disease than other patients resulting in less favorable treatment outcome. We aimed to identify the mutational landscape which could help to reduce the health disparities among minority groups and generate the first genomics exploratory study of PRAD in Mexican patients.MethodsParaffin-embedded formalin-fixed tumoral tissue from 20 Mexican patients with early-stage PRAD treated at The Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City from 2017 to 2019 were analyzed. Tumoral DNA was prepared for whole exome sequencing, the resulting files were mapped against h19 using BWA-MEM. Strelka2 and Lancet packages were used to identify single nucleotide variants (SNV) and insertions or deletions. FACETS was used to determine somatic copy number alterations (SCNA). Cancer Genome Interpreter web interface was used to determine the clinical relevance of variants.ResultsPatients were in an early clinical stage and had a mean age of 59.55 years (standard deviation [SD]: 7.1 years) with 90% of them having a Gleason Score of 7. Follow-up time was 48.50 months (SD: 32.77) with recurrences and progression in 30% and 15% of the patients, respectively. NUP98 (20%), CSMD3 (15%) and FAT1 (15%) were the genes most frequently affected by SNV; ARAF (75%) and ZNF419 (70%) were the most frequently affected by losses and gains SNCA’s. One quarter of the patients had mutations useful as biomarkers for the use of PARP inhibitors, they comprise mutations in BRCA, RAD54L and ATM. SBS05, DBS03 and ID08 were the most common mutational signatures present in this cohort. No associations with recurrence or progression were identified.ConclusionsThis pilot study reveals the mutational landscape of early-stage prostate adenocarcinoma in Mexican men, providing a first approach to understand the mutational patterns and actionable mutations in early prostate cancer can inform personalized treatment approaches and reduce the underrepresentation in genomic cancer studies.

Clinical utility of BRCA and ATM mutation status in circulating tumour DNA for treatment selection in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Identification of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) remains a challenge in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). We investigated the utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) profiling in the assessment of BRCA1/2 and ATM mutation status and treatment selection in APC. We analysed clinical and ctDNA data of 702 patients with APC enroled in GOZILA, a ctDNA profiling study using Guardant360. Inactivating BRCA1/2 and ATM mutations were detected in 4.8% (putative germline, 3.7%) and 4.4% (putative germline, 0.9%) of patients, respectively. Objective response (63.2% vs. 16.2%) and PFS (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.93) on platinum-containing chemotherapy were significantly better in patients with putative germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA) mutation than those without. In contrast, putative gBRCA mutation had no impact on the efficacy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. In 2 patients treated with platinum-containing therapy, putative BRCA2 reversion mutations were detected. Three of seven patients with somatic BRCA mutations responded to platinum-containing therapy, while only one of four with putative germline ATM mutations did. One-third of somatic ATM mutations were in genomic loci associated with clonal haematopoiesis. Comprehensive ctDNA profiling provides clinically relevant information regarding HRD status. It can be a practical, convenient option for HRD screening in APC.

Large-scale copy number alterations are enriched for synthetic viability in BRCA1/BRCA2 tumors

BackgroundPathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations contribute to hereditary breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. Paradoxically, bi-allelic inactivation of BRCA1 or BRCA2 (bBRCA1/2) is embryonically lethal and decreases cellular proliferation. The compensatory mechanisms that facilitate oncogenesis in bBRCA1/2 tumors remain unclear.MethodsWe identified recurrent genetic alterations enriched in human bBRCA1/2 tumors and experimentally validated if these improved proliferation in cellular models. We analyzed mutations and copy number alterations (CNAs) in bBRCA1/2 breast and ovarian cancer from the TCGA and ICGC. We used Fisher’s exact test to identify CNAs enriched in bBRCA1/2 tumors compared to control tumors that lacked evidence of homologous recombination deficiency. Genes located in CNA regions enriched in bBRCA1/2 tumors were further screened by gene expression and their effects on proliferation in genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screens. A set of candidate genes was functionally validated with in vitro clonogenic survival and functional assays to validate their influence on proliferation in the setting of bBRCA1/2 mutations.ResultsWe found that bBRCA1/2 tumors harbor recurrent large-scale genomic deletions significantly more frequently than histologically matched controls (n = 238 cytobands in breast and ovarian cancers). Within the deleted regions, we identified 277 BRCA1-related genes and 218 BRCA2-related genes that had reduced expression and increased proliferation in bBRCA1/2 but not in wild-type cells in genome-wide CRISPR screens. In vitro validation of 20 candidate genes with clonogenic proliferation assays validated 9 genes, including RIC8A and ATMIN (ATM-Interacting protein). We identified loss of RIC8A, which occurs frequently in both bBRCA1/2 tumors and is synthetically viable with loss of both BRCA1 and BRCA2. Furthermore, we found that metastatic homologous recombination deficient cancers acquire loss-of-function mutations in RIC8A. Lastly, we identified that RIC8A does not rescue homologous recombination deficiency but may influence mitosis in bBRCA1/2 tumors, potentially leading to increased micronuclei formation.ConclusionsThis study provides a means to solve the tumor suppressor paradox by identifying synthetic viability interactions and causal driver genes affected by large-scale CNAs in human cancers.

Low-dose abiraterone plus Olaparib as a late-line treatment for mCRPC patients without BRCA1/2 mutations: a multicenter retrospective pilot study

Although overall survival data are still premature, the PROpel study found radiological progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of abiraterone and olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, for patients who have not been genetically tested or lack BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCAm), this combination therapy has been questioned as a first-line conventional treatment for mCRPC, mainly due to significant health economics and side effects. In our retrospective study, we found that treatment with low-dose abiraterone plus olaparib as a late-line treatment for mCRPC could lead to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and symptom PFS in selective cases even without BRCAm. The median PSA–PFS was 8 months (IQR: 6.5–11.5), with a median follow-up duration of 39.0 months (IQR: 27.5–64.5). Gene tests were conducted in all patients, identifying non-BRCA mutations through ctDNA testing (24%), tumor tissue testing (12%), or both (64%). Adverse events occurred in 72% of patients, with 16% experiencing Grade ≥ 3 events. Common adverse events included anemia (64%), decreased appetite (48%), and fatigue (25%). Our findings support low-dose abiraterone plus olaparib as a potential option for mCRPC patients without BRCAm, offering manageable safety and efficacy profiles.

Fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors carrying a BRCA1 or 2 genetic mutation : a cross-sectional study

BackgroundFear of cancer recurrence (FCR) affects virtually all patients who have been treated for cancer, to varying degrees. Breast cancer survivors who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation are at high risk of cancer recurrence. No study has yet assessed FCR specifically in this population.ObjectivesThis cross-sectional study, conducted in women who were treated for breast cancer and carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation, aimed to: (1) assess the mean level of FCR and estimate the proportion of patients with clinical levels of FCR; (2) examine the relationships between FCR and selected psychological variables (e.g., avoidance, intolerance to uncertainty) and quality of life; (3) explore whether FCR levels vary as a function of the past preventive treatment received; and (4) to assess the associations between FCR and the presence of decisional conflict or regret regarding the various preventive options.MethodParticipants were recruited through an e-mail sent to an oncogenetic network mailing list (Réseau ROSE). Participants were asked to complete a battery of questionnaires online assessing FCR and other psychological and quality of life variables.ResultsA total of 89 women completed the survey. Most participants had undergone a preventive mastectomy (62.9%) and a preventive salpingo-oophorectomy (75.3%) at the time of the study. The mean Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-severity score was 16.8, which exceeds the clinical cut-off score of 13, and 70.8% of the participants showed a clinical level of FCR. FCR was significantly associated with higher levels of anxiety and depression, and higher avoidance and intolerance of uncertainty, but not with quality of life. No significant difference was observed on the total FCR score between women who had received preventive surgery (mastectomy and/or salpingo-oophorectomy) and those considering it, and those not considering it. The association was significant between higher FRC scores and greater decisional conflicts and regrets about choosing to undergo preventive surgery.ConclusionThese data suggest that FCR is a significant problem for breast cancer survivors carrying a BRCA1/2 genetic mutation, even after undergoing a prophylactic surgery. This highlights the importance of providing these women with specific psychological intervention focusing on FCR.

The USP1 Inhibitor KSQ-4279 Overcomes PARP Inhibitor Resistance in Homologous Recombination-Deficient Tumors.

Defects in DNA repair pathways play a pivotal role in tumor evolution and resistance to therapy. At the same time, they create vulnerabilities that render tumors dependent on the remaining DNA repair processes. This phenomenon is exemplified by the clinical activity of PARP inhibitors in tumors with homologous recombination (HR) repair defects, such as tumors with inactivating mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. However, the development of resistance to PARP inhibitors in BRCA-mutant tumors represents a high unmet clinical need. In this study, we identified deubiquitinase ubiquitin-specific peptidase-1 (USP1) as a critical dependency in tumors with BRCA mutations or other forms of HR deficiency and developed KSQ-4279, the first potent and selective USP1 inhibitor to enter clinical testing. The combination of KSQ-4279 with a PARP inhibitor was well tolerated and induced durable tumor regression across several patient-derived PARP-resistant models. These findings indicate that USP1 inhibitors represent a promising therapeutic strategy for overcoming PARP inhibitor resistance in patients with BRCA-mutant/HR-deficient tumors and support continued testing in clinical trials. Significance: KSQ-4279 is a potent and selective inhibitor of USP1 that induces regression of PARP inhibitor-resistant tumors when dosed in combination with PARP inhibitors, addressing an unmet clinical need for BRCA-mutant tumors.

Immunotherapy Prior to a Liver Transplant: Literature Review and a Case Report of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With BRCA1 Mutation

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality worldwide. The effectiveness of its standard treatment in some cases remains poor.We report a case of a patient with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C cryptogenic HCC whose life duration was 26 months after diagnosis.A 46-year-old woman, a former smoker, presented with elevated alpha-fetoprotein and a left liver lobe mass diagnosed as HCC. Pulmonary nodules (presumably metastatic) were previously found and remained stable. The left lobe of the liver was resected. Intrahepatic recurrence developed 1.5 months later. Lenvatinib+pembrolizumab therapy was prescribed and later switched to olaparib following the detection of somatic and germline BRCA1 mutation. The patient underwent a liver transplant and was prescribed a combination of tacrolimus and everolimus, later supplemented with extracorporeal photopheresis. Pulmonary nodules that were found to be metastases were treated with radiation therapy. A lethal outcome occurred 21.3 months after the transplant.The first literature review related to this case report discusses the problem of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy prior to a liver transplant. More than 100 patients have been described in 40 articles and 113 patients, in 2 multicenter studies. Although 16.7%-27.7% of patients developed rejection, such approach may be effective in downstaging the disease.

Assessing olaparib efficacy in U.S. Veterans with metastatic prostate cancer utilizing a time-indifferent g-rate method ideal for real-world analyses

We aimed to assess real-world efficacy of the PARP inhibitor, olaparib, in US Veterans with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) by leveraging the national data repository and evaluate a novel approach to assess treatment efficacy in tumors considered rare or harboring rare mutations. Included Veterans had 1) mPC with somatic or germline alterations/mutations in genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR), 2) received olaparib monotherapy as well as a novel hormonal therapy/androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (NHT/ARPI), and/or chemotherapy, and 3) estimable rates of tumor growth (g-rate) using PSA values obtained while receiving treatment. Previous work has shown an excellent inverse correlation of g-rate with survival. Using g-rate, we determined tumor doubling time (DT) and DT ratios (DT on olaparib/DT on prior medication). We postulated that a DT ratio≥ 1 was associated with benefit. We identified 139 Veterans, including 42 Black males with tumors harboring mutations/alterations in HRR genes who received olaparib: BRCA2 (50), ATM (32), BRCA1 (10), other mutations (47). 62/139 (45%) of all and 21/42 (50%) of Black Veterans had DT ratios ≥1, including 31, 10, 2, and 19 with BRCA2, ATM, BRCA1, and other mutations, respectively (p=0.006). Median survival with DT ratios ≥1 was superior, being 24.5 vs. 11.4 months for DT ratio <1 (p=0.01, HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.85). Benefit from olaparib, defined as DT ratio ≥1, was not observed for germline status, starting PSA value, number of prior therapies, or immediate prior therapy. Compared to matched cohorts, tumors in the olaparib cohort had shorter DTs with enzalutamide in first line (367 vs. 884 days; p=0.0043). Using equations indifferent to timing of assessments ideal for real-world efficacy analyses, we showed DT ratio ≥1 representing slower tumor growth on olaparib relative to the prior therapy correlates with improved survival. Olaparib efficacy in Veterans with mPC harboring mutations/alterations in HRR genes emulates clinical trial results. Black men had comparable results. Compared to matched cohorts, in first line, enzalutamide was less efficacious in tumors harboring mutations/alterations in HRR genes. American Society of Clinical Oncology Conquer Cancer Foundation (ASCO CCF), the Blavatnik Family Foundation and the Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF).

Management of BRCA-associated breast cancer patients in low and middle-income countries: a review.

Breast cancer poses a significant global health challenge, with higher incidence rates in developed countries. However, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) suffer from higher mortality rates due to various factors, including limited screening programs, delayed diagnosis and inadequate access to healthcare and advanced treatments. Approximately 5%-10% of breast cancer cases stem from germline mutations in BRCA-1/2 genes. A positive BRCA1/2 status obtained through genetic testing significantly influences surgical and medical treatment decisions. Therefore, genetic counseling, proper surveillance and customized interventions for BRCA1/2 carriers are essential to maximizing the benefits of monitoring, chemoprevention and risk-reducing surgeries for breast and ovarian cancers. Identification of BRCA mutations also impacts treatment strategies, leading to the integration of chemotherapeutic agents like platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors. However, implementing these advanced treatment guidelines in LMICs with complex, fragmented and underfunded healthcare systems presents numerous challenges. In this review, we explore the current status and obstacles associated with managing BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer in LMICs.

Real-world data on the prevalence of BRCA1/2 and HRR gene mutations in patients with primary and metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

PurposeThis study seeks to contribute real-world data on the prevalence of BRCA1/2 and HRR gene mutations in prostate cancer.MethodsWe compiled sequencing data of 197 cases of primary and metastatic prostate cancer, in which HRR mutation analysis was performed upon clinical request within the last 5 years. All cases were analyzed using a targeted NGS BRCAness multigene panel, including 8 HRR genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDK12, CHEK2, FANCA, HDAC2, PALB2).ResultsOur findings reveal a prevalence of potentially targetable mutations based on FDA criteria of 20.8%, which is comparable to the literature. However, the frequency of targetable BRCA2 mutations within our cohort was lower than reported for mCRPC and ATM and CHEK2 mutations were more prevalent instead. Thus, while 20.8% (n = 38) of the cases meet the criteria for olaparib treatment per FDA approval, only 4.9% (n = 9) align with the eligibility criteria according to the EMA approval.ConclusionThis study offers valuable real-world insights into the landscape of BRCA1/2 and HRR gene mutations and the practical clinical management of HRR gene testing in prostate cancer, contributing to a better understanding of patient eligibility for PARPi treatment.

Harnessing Institutionally Developed Clinical Targeted Sequencing to Improve Patient Survival in Breast Cancer: A Seven-Year Experience.

Considering the high disease burden and unique features of Asian patients with breast cancer (BC), it is essential to have a comprehensive view of genetic characteristics in this population. An institutional targeted sequencing platform was developed through the Korea Research-Driven Hospitals project and was incorporated into clinical practice. This study explores the use of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and its outcomes in patients with advanced/metastatic BC in the real world. We reviewed the results of NGS tests administered to BC patients using a customized sequencing platform - FiRST Cancer Panel (FCP) - over seven years. We systematically described clinical translation of FCP for precise diagnostics, personalized therapeutic strategies, and unraveling disease pathogenesis. NGS tests were conducted on 548 samples from 522 patients with BC. 97.6% of tested samples harbored at least one pathogenic alteration. The common alterations included mutations in TP53(56.2%), PIK3CA(31.2%), GATA3(13.8%), BRCA2(10.2%), and amplifications of CCND1(10.8%), FGF19(10.0%), and ERBB2(9.5%). NGS analysis of ERBB2 amplification correlated well with HER2 immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. RNA panel analyses found potentially actionable and prognostic fusion genes. FCP effectively screened for potentially germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutation. 10.3% of BC patients received matched therapy guided by NGS, resulting in a significant overall survival advantage (p=0.022), especially for metastatic BCs. . Clinical NGS provided multifaceted benefits, deepening our understanding of the disease, improving diagnostic precision, and paving the way for targeted therapies. The concrete advantages of FCP highlight the importance of multi-gene testing for BC, especially for metastatic conditions.

A Review on Heavy Metals in Ecosystems, Their Sources, Roles, and Impact on Plant Life

The presence of heavy metals (HMs) on Earth is essential to all forms of life. These metals are essential for plant and animal development but can have numerous negative effects on the living environment. In this review, we looked at where HMs come from, why they are harmful, and how they affect plants. Articles indexed in Google Scholar, PubMed, Research Gate, Science Direct, and a few books on heavy metals were consulted for this study. Heavy metals are essential for plant development and growth. According to this analysis, the hazardous effects of HMs are on the rise all throughout the globe, and this trend may be attributed mostly to human activity. Because of its impact on agricultural productivity and environmental changes, soil pollution caused by HMs is among the most crucial elements. Plants have evolved very sophisticated defense systems to deal with these environmental challenges. The threat that HM stress poses to plants has attracted a lot of attention worldwide because it could stunt agriculture’s long-term expansion. In spite of their importance for plants, this study found that HMs pose a significant threat to plant life. The novelty of this review lies in its detailed examination of both the beneficial and detrimental roles of HMs, providing a balanced perspective often overlooked in current literature. The significance of this work is underscored by its potential to inform sustainable agricultural practices and environmental management strategies, as it highlights the delicate balance required to harness the benefits of HMs while mitigating their risks. Despite their necessity for plant development, this review underscores the significant risks HMs pose to plant health and ecosystems.Less than 10 cases have been reported in the literature of the association of germline BRCA1 and Squamous cell Carcinoma – the esophagus. The article focuses on the probable pathogenesis of BRCA1 mutation with non-classic malignancies and the response of Poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARP) inhibitors in such a scenario. We report an unusual manifestation of the BRCA1 gene with second primary oesophageal squamous cell cancer occurring five years later to triple-negative breast cancer.

Reproductive outcomes in women with BRCA 1/2 germline mutations: A retrospective observational study and literature review.

To evaluate the reproductive outcomes of patients bearing BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutations. In this retrospective observational cohort study, we assessed data from BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 carriers, analyzing demographics, oncological history, and reproductive outcomes. Statistical analysis compared BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 carriers. A thorough review of the literature was carried out. Fifty-eight patients were included. BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutations were equally distributed. Eighty-nine pregnancies occurred in our series, hesitated in 73 live births and 19 miscarriages. Mean age at first and last pregnancy was 27.8 ± 4.8 and 31.6 ± 4.8 years old. Thirty-nine patients have had at least one live birth (67.2%). Mean number of live births was 1.9 ± 0.6. Live birth rate (LBR) was 81.1% and miscarriage rate was 32.8%. Spontaneous fertility was unaltered, as evidenced by high LBR. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences between BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 carriers. Our results shows that spontaneous reproductive outcomes in BRCA-mutated patients are reassuring. Despite evidence indicating a decrease in ovarian reserve among BRCA patients, this factor seems to not impact spontaneous fertility negatively. Further research is needed, and individuals with BRCA mutations should consider early family planning and fertility preservation in case of partner absence.

Olaparib monotherapy or in combination with abiraterone for treating mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: alone or stronger together?

Prostate cancer has entered the era of precision medicine with the introduction of PARP inhibitors for patients with specific mutations in genes associated with DNA damage repair. Recent studies have shown benefit in combination therapy with PARP inhibitors like olaparib and antiandrogens like abiraterone. This review discusses the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of olaparib as well as the data supporting combination therapy with olaparib and abiraterone. Co-targeting the androgen receptor and PARP pathway has shown clear clinical benefit in the management of patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer and mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and ATM. The benefit in patients without these mutations is less clear, and the benefit of olaparib combination therapy in the management of hormone sensitive disease remains to be seen.

Physician-reported patient involvement and treatment decisions in first-line ovarian cancer in the USA and Europe

ObjectivesReal-world data evaluating how approvals of novel treatment regimens for ovarian cancer have impacted the treatment paradigm, including first-line maintenance, are lacking. This analysis aimed to describe treatment patterns for...

Should Only Patients with BRCA Mutation Be Treated with a Combination of an Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor and a PARP Inhibitor for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer? The Answer Is No

Patients who benefit the most from combinations of an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and a PARP inhibitor are those with a BRCA mutation, but there are certainly patients without BRCA mutations who will benefit from this treatment strategy.

ISGylation enhances dsRNA-induced interferon response and NFκB signaling in fallopian tube epithelial cells

Heritable mutations in BRCA1 associate with increased risk of high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSTOC). Non-genetic risk factors associated with this cancer, which arises from fallopian tube epithelial (FTE) cells, suggests a role for repetitive ovulation wherein FTE cells are exposed to inflammatory signaling molecules within follicular fluid. We previously reported increased NFκB and EGFR signaling in BRCA1-deficient primary FTE cells, with follicular fluid exposure further increasing abundance of interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) transcripts, including the ubiquitin-like protein ISG15 and other ISGylation pathway members. Both NFκB and type I interferon signaling are upregulated by stimulation of cGAS-STING or MDA5 and RIGI pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Since some PRRs and their signal transduction pathway members are ISGylated, we tested the impact of ISG15 and ISGylation on IRF3 and NFκB signaling through cGAS-STING or RIGI and MDA5 activation. Expression of ISG15 or UBA7, the E1-like ISG15 activating enzyme, in immortalized FTE cells was disrupted by CRISPR gene editing. Activation of IRF3 by RIGI or MDA5 but not cGAS-STING was attenuated by loss of either ISG15 or UBA7 and this was reflected by a similar effect on NFκB activation and downstream targets. Loss of ISGylation decreased levels of both MDA5 and RIGI, with knock-down of RIGI but not MDA5, decreasing IRF3 and NFκB activation in parental cells. These finding indicate that ISGylation enhances the ability of dsRNA to activate cytokine release and pro-inflammatory signaling. Further work to explore ISGylation as a target for prevention of HGSTOC in BRCA1 mutation carriers is warranted.

The guidelines for clinical practice for carriers of germline mutations in hereditary breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer predisposition genes BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2 (4.2024).

The Guidelines for Clinical Practice for carriers of pathogenic variants in clinically relevant cancer predisposition genes define the steps of primary and secondary prevention that should be provided to these individuals at high risk of developing hereditary cancer in the Czech Republic. The drafting of the guidelines was organized by the Oncogenetics Working Group of the Society for Medical Genetics and Genomics of J. E. Purkyně Czech Medical Society (SLG ČLS JEP) in cooperation with the representatives of oncology and oncogynecology. The guidelines are based on the current recommendations of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and take into account the capacity of the Czech healthcare system.

Efficacy of a platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge for platinum-sensitive recurrence after PARP inhibitor maintenance

ObjectivePlatinum-free interval (PFI) is the period from the end of platinum-based chemotherapy to the date of recurrence. If the PFI is > 6 months, a platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge is considered; however, its efficacy after poly adenosine 5′-diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy is unknown. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of a platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge after PARP inhibitor therapy. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients with ovarian cancer with a PFI≥6 months with PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy, receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. Duration of PARP inhibitor therapy, best response to subsequent platinum chemotherapy rechallenge, and clinical characteristics were collected from medical records. Tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Correlations were calculated using Spearman’s correlation coefficients. ResultsAmong the 10 included patients, seven (70 %) received PARP inhibitors after primary chemotherapy, and three (30 %) received chemotherapy for platinum-sensitive relapse. One and five patients harbored a germline BRCA1 and BRCA wild-type mutations, respectively, and two had homologous recombination proficiency. The median PFI was 303.5 (182–602) days, and PARP inhibitor therapy duration was 249 (147–570) days. Platinum chemotherapy rechallenge efficacy was complete and partial response and stable disease in one (10 %), six (60 %), and three (30 %) patients, respectively. The longer the duration of PARP inhibitor treatment, better the response to platinum agents (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.284, p = 0.0288). ConclusionPlatinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge is reasonable for patients with platinum-sensitive disease, using the traditional PFI cutoff of 6 months, even when the PFI is obtained with a maintenance PARP inhibitor.

Clinical significance of germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (gBRCA) testing and olaparib as maintenance therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer

BackgroundGermline breast cancer susceptibility gene (gBRCA) mutation in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) is not common in clinical practice. Therefore, factors that efficiently show gBRCA mutations and the real-world outcomes of olaparib maintenance therapy have not been fully established. In the present study, we clarified the indicators for the effective detection of gBRCA mutation and the efficacy and safety of olaparib as maintenance therapy.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 84 patients with PC who underwent gBRCA testing (BRACAnalysis, Myriad Genetics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) at our institute between January 2021 and March 2022. For each patient, clinical data were extracted from medical records.ResultsThe median patient age was 64 y (29–85 y), and 41 patients (48.8%) were male. The gBRCA mutations were identified in 10 (11.9%) patients; two patients had BRCA1 mutation and eight had BRCA2 mutation. All patients with gBRCA mutation had a family history of any cancer, and eight of them had a family history of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC)-related cancer. The gBRCA mutation rate was higher for patients with PC with a family history of HBOC-related cancer compared to that in patients with PC having a family history of other cancers and no family history of cancer (22.9% vs. 4.1%; P = 0.014). In our study, eight out of 10 patients with gBRCA-positive PC received olaparib after platinum-based chemotherapy. The best responses to platinum-based chemotherapy included a complete response in one patient (12.5%) and a partial response in seven patients (87.5%). The median duration of treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy plus olaparib was 17.5 months (8–87 months), and the duration of treatment with olaparib maintenance therapy was 11 months (1–30 months). During olaparib maintenance therapy, three patients showed no disease progression. One of these three patients underwent conversion surgery after receiving olaparib for 12 months.ConclusionsThe gBRCA testing should be considered proactively, especially in patients with PC with a family history of HBOC-related cancer.