Germline Mutations In BRCA1 Research Articles

Germline BRCA testing in pancreatic cancer: improving awareness, timing, turnaround, and uptake.

Prognosis is generally poor for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, patients with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations (gBRCAm) may benefit from first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and maintenance therapy with the poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib following at least 16 weeks of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy without disease progression. Germline breast cancer gene (BRCA) testing is therefore important to ensure that patients receive the most effective treatment. In addition, testing for other DNA damage response gene mutations beyond gBRCAm may also guide treatment decisions. However, clinical pathways for genetic testing are often suboptimal, leading to delays in treatment initiation or missed opportunities for personalized therapy. Barriers to testing include low rates of referral and uptake, delays to referral and slow result turnaround times, cost, and biopsy and assay limitations if somatic testing is performed, leading to the requirement for subsequent dedicated germline testing. Low rates of referral may result from lack of awareness among physicians of the clinical value of testing, coupled with low confidence in interpreting test results and poor availability of genetic counseling services. Among patients, barriers to uptake may include similar lack of awareness of the clinical value of testing, anxiety regarding the implications of test results, lack of insurance coverage, fear of negative insurance implications, and socioeconomic factors. Potential solutions include innovative approaches to testing pathways, including 'mainstreaming' of testing in which BRCA tests are routinely arranged by the treating oncologist, with the involvement of genetic counselors if a patient is found to have a gBRCAm. More recently, the utility of multigene panel analyses has also been explored. Access to genetic counseling may also be improved through initiatives such as having a genetic counseling appointment for all new patient visits and telemedicine approaches, including the use of telephone consultations or DVD-assisted counseling. Educational programs will also be beneficial, and cost effectiveness is likely to improve as the number of targeted treatments increases and when the earlier detection of tumors in family members following cascade testing is considered.

PARP Inhibitors in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer: From Scientific Rationale to Clinical Development.

Prostate cancer (PC) treatment has reached a milestone with the introduction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) induce breaks in single-stranded and/or double-stranded DNA, resulting in synthetic lethality in cancer cells lacking functional homologous recombination genes. Around 20% to 25% of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer harbor mutations in DNA damage repair genes, either somatic or germline. The success of PARPi in these patients has prompted studies exploring its potential in tumors classified as "BRCAness," which refers to tumors without germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Additionally, there is a proposed connection between androgen receptor signaling and synthetic lethality of PARPi. The inclusion of genetic mutation tests in the treatment algorithm for PC is a significant step towards precision and personalized medicine, marking a first in the field. The objectives of this review encompass understanding the mechanism of action of PARPi in both monotherapy and combination therapy, exploring patient selection criteria, discussing pivotal studies that led to its approval, and offering future prospects. However, numerous unanswered questions remain, including the identification of the patient population that could benefit most from PARPi, determining whether to use PARPi as monotherapy or in combination, and finding the optimal timing of PARPi administration in advanced or localized disease. To address these questions, several ongoing clinical trials are being conducted.

High grade acinic cell carcinoma of the breast with clear cytoplasm mimics clear cell carcinoma in a BRCA1 mutation carrier: a case report and review of the literature on the molecular analysis.

Acinic cell carcinoma of the breast is an extremely rare tumor. To the best of our knowledge, only one case is reported to have bilateral tumors and had both BRCA1 and TP53 mutation. Herein, we report another case of acinic cell carcinoma of the breast in a 29-years-old female carrying germline BRCA1 and TP53 mutation, and the tumor showed a complex combination of histological features which had not only the reported common features such as diffuse infiltrative small acinar or glandular structures mixed with solid nests, but also the uncommon widespread clear cells, high grade tumor cells. The immunohistochemical profile of the tumor cells was strongly positive for lysozyme and triple negative for ER, PR, HER2. Although she had bilateral high grade breast cancers, this patient refused postoperative adjuvant therapy this time and has been doing well in the past 12 months. As a rare form of triple-negative breast cancer with a relatively not so bad prognosis, more reports are needed to understand its biological characteristics.

Genetic Counseling, Screening and Risk-Reducing Surgery in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA Mutations: Unmet Needs in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Worldwide genetic counseling practices are variable and often not reported in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We present the follow-up genetic counseling, breast screening, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in a cohort of study patients with either BRCA pathogenic mutations or BRCA variant of unknown significance (VUS). Chart review and phone calls for the collection of information. Out of a cohort of 250 patients, 14 had deleterious mutations and 31 had a VUS, of whom 19 had primary early breast cancer. We collected information about genetic counseling, screening, CPM and RRSO. Fourteen patients with deleterious mutations (7 BRCA1 and 7 BRCA2) and 19 patients with VUS mutations (20 VUS, 4 BRCA1, 16 BRCA2; 1 patient had both) were surveyed. Of 14 patients with deleterious BRCA mutations, 57.14% (8/14 patients) received genetic counseling from their oncologist. Subsequently 85.71% (12/14) are undergoing mammography screening and 35.71% (5/14) breast screening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Furthermore, 50% of them underwent CPM and 57.14% underwent RRSO. Of 19 patients with VUS mutations, 10.5% received genetic counseling from their oncologist; 78.9% were undergoing regular screening mammogram and 31.5% were undergoing breast MRI; one patient underwent CPM and two patients RRSO. Within three years from knowing they have a mutation, 50% of patients with germline BRCA mutations had undergone CPM and 60% RRSO, the majority of them had screening mammography surveillance but only 50% had screening MRI. Follow-up of patients with VUS with mammography was 78% but MRI was only 31%. Lack of MRI surveillance reflects both limited resources and insufficient counseling. Genetic counseling was done by medical oncologists, which reflects a trend in LMIC. Our Data shows the importance of the need for professional genetic counselors and optimal surveillance in Lebanon and other LMICs.

Ovarian cancer onset across different BRCA mutation types: a view to a more tailored approach for BRCA mutated patients

ObjectiveTo evaluate the role of different specific types of germline breast cancer susceptibility BRCA mutations on the age of onset of high grade serous ovarian cancer.MethodsThis was a multicenter, international,...

Pathologic complete response following FOLFIRINOX and olaparib treatment for hepatic metastasized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with a germline BRCA mutation.

A 47-year-old female who was previously treated for BRCA1 germline mutant breast cancer presented with increasing back pain. Radiological and pathological investigations led to the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with multiple hepatic metastases. Serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were highly elevated at 14,784 U/mL (normal, < 37 U/mL). After nine cycles of FOLFIRINOX treatment, radiological findings revealed remarkable shrinkage of the primary pancreatic tumor, disappearance of hepatic metastases, and normalized levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels. Because of increased neuropathy following FOLFIRINOX treatment, the patient was switched to maintenance olaparib treatment. Ten months later, her radiological response and normalized carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were stable. After staging laparoscopy, the patient underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy as a conversion surgery. Histopathological examination revealed no signs of residual adenocarcinoma in the resected pancreatic specimens, which was diagnosed as a pathological complete response. The patient recovered without complications. Adjuvant olaparib treatment was administered with no signs of recurrence at 7 months after surgery. In conclusion, a pathologic complete response after FOLFIRINOX and olaparib maintenance treatment in hepatic metastasized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is extremely rare. These bridging treatments may contribute to increased surgical resection rates and improved survival rates.

All HER2-negative breast cancer patients need gBRCA testing: cost-effectiveness and clinical benefits

BackgroundThe OlympiA trial demonstrated the benefits of adjuvant usage of olaparib for high-risk patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC) and germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation. This provoked thoughts on the clinical criteria of gBRCA testing. This study aims to estimate the costs and benefits of gBRCA testing and adjuvant olaparib therapy for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hormone-receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative BC in China and the United States of America (USA).MethodsWe used a Markov chain decision tree analytic model to compare three gBRCA screening policies in China and the USA: (1) no gBRCA testing; (2) selected gBRCA testing and (3) universal gBRCA testing for nonmetastatic TNBC and HR-positive HER2-negative BC patients. We modelled the benefit of systemic therapy and risk-reducing surgeries among patients identified with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 and BRCA2.ResultsChanging from the selected gBRCA testing to the universal gBRCA testing in TNBC patients is cost-effective, with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) being 10991.1 and 56518.2 USD/QALY in China and the USA, respectively. Expanding universal gBRCA testing to HR-positive HER2-negative BC and TNBC patients has ICERs of 2023.3 and 16611.1 USD/QALY in China and the USA, respectively.DiscussionBy performing gBRCA testing on all HER2-negative BC patients, adjuvant olaparib can be offered to high-risk patients with a PV in BRCA1 or BRCA2. These patients are also candidates for risk-reducing surgeries, an important aspect of their survivorship care, and these interventions can improve survival outcomes. With the willingness-to-pay thresholds being 31,500.0 and 100,000.0 USD per QALY gained in China and the USA, respectively, universal gBRCA testing is likely cost-effective for all HER2-negative BC patients. This simplified criterion of gBRCA testing for BC is recommended for adoption by current guidelines in China and the USA.

Metastatic colorectal cancer as the primary phenotype in a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patient with Germline BRCA1 mutation: a case report

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome has increased predisposition to breast and/or ovarian cancer, and 24% of families with HBOC were associated with the germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2. Timely diagnosis and identification of mutation carriers is of utmost importance to improve survival benefit and quality of life. Cancers that have been included into screening of BRCA1/2 associated HBOC included prostate and pancreatic cancers etc. In this case, we reported a patient who firstly presented symptoms of CRC and was finally diagnosed as BRCA1 associated HBOC with advanced peritoneal carcinoma. With strategies of cetuximab based treatment and olaparib, and debulking surgeries, she has achieved an overall survival (OS) > 35 months. The aim was to indicate that HBOC might also first present as CRC, and comprehensive next-generation sequencing analysis might be a key complement for screening and diagnose of HBOC.

NGS-based targeted gene mutational profiles in Korean patients with pancreatic cancer

According to molecular profiling studies, a considerable number of patients with pancreatic cancer harbor potentially actionable mutations. However, there are limited relevant data from the Korean population. We assessed the molecular profiles of patients with pancreatic cancer in Korea. This study collected molecular profiling data from patients with pancreatic cancer who visited Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between March 2018 and August 2020. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens were sequenced using a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform. Cancer-associated mutations were analyzed, and potentially actionable mutations were identified. Potentially actionable mutations were classified into “highly actionable” and “modifies options” based on the Know Your Tumor registry study. In total, 87 patients with NGS tumor panel data were identified. Sixty-one patients (70.1%) had metastatic disease at the time of tissue acquisition. Tissues were obtained from the primary tumors and metastatic sites in 41 (47.1%) and 46 (52.9%) patients, respectively. At least one pathogenic mutation was reported in 86 patients (98.9%). The frequencies of four common mutations in our cohort were similar to those in The Cancer Genome Atlas data. Potentially actionable mutations were identified in 27 patients (31.0%). Of these, mutations categorized as highly actionable and modifies options were identified in 12 (13.8%) and 18 patients (20.7%), respectively. The most frequent highly actionable mutations were located in DNA damage response genes, such as BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM (n = 6, 6.9%). Two patients with germline BRCA1 mutations received maintenance poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy. One patient has been receiving maintenance treatment for 18 months while remaining in radiologically complete remission. Mutational profiles using targeted NGS in Korean patients with pancreatic cancer were similar to those in Western patients. The present study supports the clinical potential and possible expanded clinical use of genetic profiling.

Pamiparib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer with germline BRCA mutations: a phase II study

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of pamiparib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) breast cancer, with deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCA1/2 m).MethodsIn this open-label, phase II, multicenter study in China (NCT03575065), patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC cohort) or hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2− breast cancer (HR+/HER2− cohort) and ≤ 2 prior lines of chemotherapy received pamiparib 60 mg orally twice daily in 28-day, continuous cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1) by independent review committee.ResultsIn total, 88 patients were enrolled (TNBC cohort: 62; HR+/HER2− cohort: 26). Median age was 45.5 (range: 27–67) years, and 60 patients (68.2%) had received 1 or 2 prior lines of chemotherapy; 42 patients (47.7%) had previously received platinum chemotherapy. In the TNBC cohort, ORR was 38.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.4–52.3) and median duration of response (DoR) was 7.0 months (95% CI 3.9–not estimable). In the HR+/HER2− cohort, ORR was 61.9% (95% CI 38.4–81.9) and median DoR was 7.5 months (95% CI 5.6–14.8). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-related TEAEs, and ≥ Grade 3 TEAEs were hematologic (including anemia, decreased neutrophil count, and decreased white blood cell count). Overall, 64.8% of patients had TEAEs leading to dose reduction and 2.3% had TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation.ConclusionPamiparib showed encouraging efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in patients with locally advanced and metastatic HER2− breast cancer with gBRCA1/2 m.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03575065; July 2, 2018.

PP121 Comparison of genomic and transcriptional homologous recombination deficiency assays in breast cancer patients with germline BRCA mutations

PP121 Comparison of genomic and transcriptional homologous recombination deficiency assays in breast cancer patients with germline BRCA mutations

CTIM-02. TIP: PHASE I/II STUDY OF STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY WITH CONCURRENT OLAPARIB FOLLOWED BY ADJUVANT DURVALUMAB AND PHYSICIAN’S CHOICE SYSTEMIC THERAPY IN SUBJECTS WITH BREAST CANCER BRAIN METASTASES

Abstract BACKGROUND Despite progress in the treatment of brain metastasis (BrM) for HER2+ breast cancer (BC), outcomes for patients with HER2-negative BC BrM remain poor. Current standard of care consists of local therapies, including surgery and radiotherapy, followed by systemic therapy. Preclinical studies show inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) are effective with radiation therapy as a DNA damage response inhibitor. Triple negative BC (TNBC) has higher rates of homologous recombination deficiency compared to other BC subtypes, and together with HER2-negative, BRCA-mutated BC would be particularly sensitive to PARP inhibition. PARP inhibition also shows promising efficacy combined with immunotherapy in patients with germline BRCA-mutant and metastatic TNBC in clinical trials (MEDIOLA, TOPACIO). In addition, immunotherapy with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is associated with favorable intracranial control and survival in patients with BrM. We hypothesize that this biologically-rational combination will enhance local control of SRS-treated BrM through synergy with PARP inhibition, while controlling micrometastatic disease in the brain and extracranial sites via potentiation of the immune response. METHOD We are conducting a multi-institution, Phase I/II trial of SRS plus olaparib, followed by durvalumab (with physician’s choice systemic therapy), for patients with TNBC (any BRCA status) or HER2-negative with BRCA-mutated (germline or somatic) BC BrM [NCT04711824]. The primary objectives are to evaluate safety and tolerability (Phase I) and determine intracranial disease control at 6 months (Phase II) of this treatment combination. Secondary objectives include determining clinical activity via intracranial and global progression-free survival, overall survival, and intracranial and extracranial response rate. Exploratory objectives will assess potential biomarkers of treatment response, including changes in circulating tumor cells and DNA in blood and cerebrospinal fluid, germline and tumor mutations in DNA repair pathway genes, and PD-L1 expression, as well as quality of life and patient-reported outcomes. A surgical sub-study will evaluate olaparib concentration/distribution in resected BrM.

CNSC-37. ATYPICAL GERMLINE MUTATIONS AND PRIMARY CNS TUMORS: A SINGLE-CENTER CASE SERIES AND LITERATURE REVIEW

Abstract A growing spectrum of germline mutations and their association with primary CNS tumors has been described over the last decade. These germline mutations are implicated in regulation of DNA integrity and repair, telomere maintenance, and cell cycle regulation resulting in aberrant cellular proliferation and immune surveillance evasion. To date, there are no well-defined guidelines for primary CNS tumor surveillance for these patients. Moreover, the exact role of traditional chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiation is unclear. We present a single-institution case series of adult patients with primary CNS tumors with atypical germline mutations and literature review. The most common germline mutations encountered involved heterozygous mutations of one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes (MSH2, PMS2, MLH1). All patients developed high-grade gliomas defined as astrocytoma or glioblastoma WHO grade 4 based on the WHO 2021 classification. Germline mutations involving RAD51C, POT1, IDH1/2, MutyH, NTHL1, PALB2, and CHEK2 were associated with gliomas of variable grades and molecular subtypes. Non-glial tumors, including atypical rhabdoid tumors, medulloblastomas, hemangioblastomas, and meningiomas were found in association with germline SMARCB1, ATM, BRCA1, and CHEK2 mutations respectively. Review of the existing literature and knowledge obtained from our case series suggests several important concepts: (1) there is an increased risk of both glioma and non-glial tumor types in several atypical germline mutations, (2) multiple risk genes or variants of unknown significance likely contribute to primary brain tumor formation, (3) germline MMR mutations associated with high-grade glioma may be MMR gene-specific with potential increased risk of resistance and/or disease progression in the presence of alkylating agents such as temozolomide, (4) several germline mutations may increase risk of secondary tumor development after radiation, and (5) the role of screening for atypical germline mutations and subsequent disease surveillance remain unanswered.

BRCA mutation carriers suffering from ovarian cancer as a model for treatment decision in higher lines - Place for platinum reinduction.

Ovarian carcinoma is a malignancy with the highest mortality among gynecological cancers. Mutations in BRCA1/2 genes are believed to be a favorable prognostic factor and that, in general, the biological behavior of ovarian cancer in BRCA-positive individuals differs from others. However, some clinically relevant issues (i.e., prediction of response to chemotherapy and treatment of platinum-resistant BRCA-positive patients) remain unclear. (1) The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of germline BRCA mutations in unselected recurrent ovarian cancer patient population, (2) analyze whether biological behavior of BRCA-positive tumors differs from others, and (3) analyze the effect of platinum reinduction in platinum-resistant BRCA-positive patients. This was a single-institution retrospective analysis. Consecutive recurrent ovarian cancer patients from years 2012 to 2020 were included; their BRCA1/2 mutational status was analyzed and correlated with progression-free survival (PFS), type of treatment, and response to treatment. Statistical significance of differences between and among patients was tested for continuous variables by the Mann-Whitney U-test or the Kruskal-Wallis test; a maximum likelihood Chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Two hundred and forty-three recurrent ovarian cancer patients were included. The median follow-up was 37 months. Pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene was found in 18.1% of patients. There was no difference in PFS comparing BRCA-positive to BRCA-negative patients (median PFS: 10.2 vs. 10.1 months, P = 0.874); there was a difference in PFS comparing BRCA-negative versus BRCA-positive platinum-sensitive patients (9.4 vs. 14.3 months, P = 0.002). BRCA-positive platinum-resistant patients reinduced with platinum achieved a median PFS of 8 months (compared to those receiving nonplatinum treatment, median PFS: 4 months, P = 0.062). Germline BRCA mutations are not exclusive to platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients; even in platinum-resistant patients, mutation can be detected. We found no difference in PFS for platinum-sensitive BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative patients. Platinum reinduction may be considered for BRCA-positive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients to prolong PFS. Even these data describe only a small population, it supports the clinical practice of platinum-based chemotherapy use in platinum-resistant BRCA-positive patients.

Overview on population screening for carriers with germline BRCA mutation in China.

Carriers with BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants are associated with a high risk of breast and ovarian cancers (also pancreatic and prostate cancers). While the spectrum on germline BRCA mutations among the Chinese population shows ethnic specificity, the identification of carriers with germline BRCA mutation before cancer onset is the most effective approach to protect them. This review focused on the current status of BRCA1/2 screening, the surveillance and prevention measures, and discussed the issues and potential impact of BRCA1/2 population screening in China. We conducted literature research on databases PubMed and Google Scholar, as well as Chinese databases CNKI and Wangfang Med Online database (up to 31 March 2022). Latest publications on germline BRCA1/2 prevalence, spectrum, genetic screening as well as carrier counseling, surveillance and prevention were captured where available. While overall 15,256 records were retrieved, 72 publications using germline BRCA1/2 testing were finally retained for further analyses. Germline BRCA1/2 mutations are common in Chinese patients with hereditary breast, ovarian, prostate and pancreatic cancers. Within previous studies, a unique BRCA mutation spectrum in China was revealed. Next-generation sequencing panel was considered as the most common method for BRCA1/2 screening. Regular surveillance and preventive surgeries were tailored to carriers with mutated-BRCA1/2. We recommend that all Chinese diagnosed with breast, ovarian, pancreatic or prostate cancers and also healthy family members, shall undergo BRCA1/2 gene test to provide risk assessment. Subsequently, timely preventive measures for mutation carriers are recommended after authentic genetic counseling.

Clinico-pathological and Molecular Features of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma: Association with BRCA2 Mutation

Abstract Introduction/Objective Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) is a rare neoplasm of exocrine epithelial origin and accounts to &amp;lt;1% of primary neoplasms of pancreas. Methods/Case Report The cases diagnosed as ACC were retrieved from Pathology data base between January 2010 to July 2021. A retrospective review of clinical, pathological, molecular findings along with follow up was performed. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Eight patients with resection specimens were identified over a period of 11 years. Median age of diagnosis was 74.5 yrs with M: F ratio of 3:1 and size range of 1.8 to 10.9 cm. The tumor was located in body/tail (5) and head of pancreas (3). Immunohistochemical stains for BCL10 and trypsin were utilized in 4 cases. One patient had lymph node metastasis and two patients had liver metastasis at the time of presentation. One patient presented with lipase hypersecretion syndrome. Four cases (50%) had pT3 stage. Follow-up period was available in 7 patients and ranged from 1-3 yrs, of which 3 died within 2 yrs of surgery while 4 patients were disease free. Three patients (35%) were found to have germline (1) and somatic BRCA2 mutations (2). These patients received platinum- based chemotherapy and were free from recurrence upon follow-up of 3 yrs. Conclusion Pancreatic ACC is a rare entity. In our study, 35% (3/8) cases were associated with somatic/germline BRCA2 mutations. Our results suggest that patients with ACC should undergo genetic testing for BRCA 1/2 mutations. This would not only enable treatment of these patients with specific targeted therapies, but also aid in screening of their families.

Survival and Chemosensitivity in Advanced High Grade Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients with and without a BRCA Germline Mutation: More Evidence for Shifting the Paradigm towards Complete Surgical Cytoreduction.

Background and Objectives: Approximately 10-15% of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cases are related to BRCA germline mutations. Better survival rates and increased chemosensitivity are reported in patients with a BRCA 1/2 germline mutation. However, the FIGO stage and histopathological entity may have been confounding factors. This study aimed to compare chemotherapy response and survival between patients with and without a BRCA 1/2 germline mutation in advanced HGSOC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Materials and Methods: A cohort of BRCA-tested advanced HGSOC patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery following NACT was analyzed for chemotherapy response and survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy served as a vehicle to assess chemotherapy response on biochemical (CA125), histopathological (CRS), biological (dissemination), and surgical (residual disease) levels. Univariate and multivariate analyses for chemotherapy response and survival were utilized. Results: Thirty-nine out of 168 patients had a BRCA ½ germline mutation. No differences in histopathological chemotherapy response between the patients with and without a BRCA ½ germline mutation were observed. Survival in the groups of patients was comparable Irrespective of the BRCA status, CRS 2 and 3 (HR 7.496, 95% CI 2.523-22.27, p &lt; 0.001 & HR 4.069, 95% CI 1.388-11.93, p = 0.011), and complete surgical cytoreduction (p = 0.017) were independent parameters for a favored overall survival. Conclusions: HGSOC patients with or without BRCA ½ germline mutations, who had cytoreductive surgery, showed comparable chemotherapy responses and subsequent survival. Irrespective of BRCA status, advanced-stage HGSOC patients have a superior prognosis with complete surgical cytoreduction and good histopathological response to chemotherapy.

Cost-effectiveness of poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-inhibitors for the maintenance treatment after responding to first- and second-line chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer.

The introduction of inhibitors of poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) for the treatment of women with epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC) has radically changed the treatment in maintenance setting after responding to first- and second-line chemotherapy. The aim of this paper was to assess the pharmacological costs of PARP inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib and veliparib) in maintenance treatment after responding to first-line chemotherapy in EOC. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the ratio between the difference of the costs in the intervention and in the control groups (pharmacy costs) and the difference between the effect in the intervention and in the control groups (progression-free survival (PFS)). We have considered the pivotal phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Three different populations were considered: the overall population, patients with germline BRCA mutation (gBRCA) and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) patients non-gBRCA mutation. Three thousand four hundred and twenty patients and 1209 patients were considered in maintenance treatment after responding to first- and second-line chemotherapy in EOC, respectively. At the actual price, the treatment with PARP inhibitors is not cost-effective in maintenance treatment after responding to first-line and second-line chemotherapy in EOC. A reduction in pharmacological costs is mandatory.

Emerging strategies: PARP inhibitors in combination with immune checkpoint blockade in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-associated and triple-negative breast cancer.

Poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor monotherapy in germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-associated metastatic breast cancer is a well-tolerated and an effective therapeutic strategy, however, the durability of response can be limited. Checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis as monotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) have a limited role due to low response rates, but are capable of long, durable responses. Combination PARP inhibition with checkpoint blockade is an emerging area of investigation with potential synergy to produce robust responses with durability. Mechanistically, PARP inhibition activates the stimulator of interferon gene (STING) pathway to promote dendritic cell and T lymphocyte recruitment, increases tumor neoantigens, and upregulates PD-L1 expression to increase the immunogenicity of the tumor and thereby potentially enhance responses to immunotherapy. Several clinical trials have reported early results on PARP inhibitor and PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor combinations. All studies have shown safety and tolerability of this combination regimen. In advanced breast cancer associated with a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, response rates have been high and similar to what is observed with PARP inhibitor monotherapy. Additional follow-up is needed to see if combination with a checkpoint inhibitor can lead to a clinically meaningful extension of durability of response in patients with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. In unselected mTNBC in the 1st-3rd line setting, response rates of combined PARP inhibitor and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have ranged from 18-21%, with higher rates of response among those with alterations in homologous recombination DNA repair pathway genes. Multiple ongoing studies will report additional data on combinations of PARP inhibitors and checkpoint blockade in the future and this combination strategy remains an active area of investigation.

Proteomic signature for detection of high-grade ovarian cancer in germline BRCA mutation carriers.

No current screening methods for high-grade ovarian cancer (HGOC) guarantee effective early detection for high-risk women such as germline BRCA mutation carriers. Therefore, the standard-of-care remains risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) around age 40. Proximal liquid biopsy is a promising source of biomarkers, but sensitivity has not yet qualified for clinical implementation. We aimed to develop a proteomic assay based on proximal liquid biopsy, as a decision support tool for monitoring high-risk population. Ninety Israeli BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers were included in the training set (17 HGOC patients and 73 asymptomatic women), (BEDOCA trial; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03150121). The proteome of the microvesicle fraction of the samples was profiled by mass spectrometry and a classifier was developed using logistic regression. An independent cohort of 98 BRCA mutation carriers was used for validation. Safety information was collected for all women who opted for uterine lavage in a clinic setting. We present a 7-protein diagnostic signature, with AUC >0.97 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% for detecting HGOC. The AUC of the biomarker in the independent validation set was >0.94 and the NPV >99%. The sampling procedure was clinically acceptable, with favorable pain scores and safety. We conclude that the acquisition of Müllerian tract proximal liquid biopsies in women at high-risk for HGOC and the application of the BRCA-specific diagnostic assay demonstrates high sensitivity, specificity, technical feasibility and safety. Similar classifier for an average-risk population is warranted.