Pelvic infections, wound dehiscence, and skin complications occur in patients with complex pelvic trauma and bleeding. We assessed the role of embolization in increasing (or reducing) the incidence of skin and wound complications after embolization. Retrospective review of an institutional trauma database for pelvic fracture patients from Jan 1999 to Dec 2008 identified 4,744 patients Of these, 212 patients (146 males, 62 females, mean age, 42.1 ± 19.0 y; range, 13-88 y) underwent angiography for ongoing pelvic hemorrhage based upon CT imaging, expanding pelvic hematoma at laparotomy, or hemodynamic instability. Injuries included: blunt injuries, 192; crush injuries, 6; penetrating injuries, 10; and other, 4. The mechanisms of injury were similar among embolized and non-embolized groups, (p= 0.53). The injury severity score (ISS) were embolized patients, 31.80 ± 14.1; non-embolized patients, 28.92 ± 12.6, (p=0.08). Lengths of stay were embolized patients 102 ± 20.3; non embolized patients 106 ± 20.0, (p=0.13). Internal iliac artery branch embolization was performed in 104 patients: 78 unilateral, 26 bilateral. 58 patients were treated with gelfoam slurry, 42 with gelfoam and coils, and 4 with coils alone. The incidence of complications was 6/104 (5.8%) in embolized patients compared with 5/108 (4.6%) in the non- embolized cohort (p= 0.77) Embolized patients: wound dehiscences (2), pelvic infection (1), buttock decubiti (2), and postoperative hemorrhage (1). Nonembolized patients: pelvic infections (2) and buttock decubiti (3). Bilateral pelvic embolization was unassociated with increased incidence of complications (p = 0.48). Pelvic embolization is not associated with increased, nor reduced rates of pelvic infection, buttocks decubiti, or wound dehiscences. Bilateral pelvic embolization does not increase risks.