Abstract Lately, the remarkable progress in knowledge and treatment of cardiovascular diseases has been significantly impacting society's morbidity and mortality. However, the burden of coronary artery disease (CAD) remains non-negligible. In addition, as a consequence of demographic changes, age, as a non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factor, makes it increasingly important to focus on the elderly. Up to one-fifth of patients with CAD have a chronic total occlusion (CTO) of a coronary artery, defined as a lesion with 100% stenosis and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0 that exists for more than 3 months. There is current evidence that successful CTO-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with clinical benefits. However, elderly patients are currently underrepresented in CTO-PCI randomized controlled trials and registries, and its clinical impact and safety in this group of patients are still debated. This study aims to characterise patients submitted to CTO-PCI and compare the baseline characteristics, coronary intervention features, intraprocedural complications and in-hospital mortality between patients younger and older than 75. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients submitted to a CTO-PCI, included in the Portuguese Registry on Interventional Cardiology between January 2019 and December 2022. Comparison tests between groups for parametric and non-parametric variables were performed. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 353 patients who underwent CTO-PCI were analysed, 271 (76.8%) with 18 to 74 years old (group 1) and 82 (23.2%) with 75 or more years old (group 2). Table 1 shows the most important baseline characteristics, with similar features for both groups except body mass index and smoking habits. Table 2 demonstrates the differences between the groups regarding PCI, with the left main and left anterior descending arteries being more treated among older patients and the right coronary artery in younger patients. Complete coronary revascularization and procedure success rate did not differ significantly between groups (p-value=0.19 and p-value=0.59, respectively). Finally, table 3 presents the main intra-procedural and in-hospital complications, with a significant difference only for occlusion of the side branch, occurring in 2 patients aged over 75 years (p-value=0.01). In conclusion, in our registry, the elderly presents a high success rate in the complete recanalization of CTO lesions, comparable to the group under 75 years of age. However, the presence of side branch occlusion was higher in older patients, without other significant differences in intraprocedural and in-hospital complications, including mortality. Further studies including a large sample and follow-up analysis would be essential to better understand the rate of risks related to PCI-CTO potentially associated with the complexity and comorbidities of the elderly.Table 1Table 2 and 3