Brainstorming Phase Research Articles

Creating a patient reported outcome measure for medication-related quality of life: a concept mapping brainstorming study in Ontario, Canada

Introduction: Persons with mobility limitations generally take multiple medications to manage their conditions; however, healthcare providers across different settings do not currently have a way to measure the impact that medication taking has on patients’ quality of life (QoL). Current tools are limited, narrowly focused on few QoL domains and none focus on persons with mobility limitations. 
 Target Audience: The target audience for our study findings are healthcare providers working with individuals with mobility limitations across different healthcare settings. 
 Who was involved: This study included patient and caregiver partners. They were involved in the grant application, study participant recruitment, data collection, and final data analysis. This study also involved healthcare providers who supported participant recruitment and will be knowledge users, including pharmacists, physicians, and physical therapists. 
 Aims and Methods: The aim of this study was to identify a list of potential items for the creation of a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) from the perspectives of individuals with mobility limitations who take medications. We used a mixed methods concept mapping approach to gather perspectives from across Canada. Here, we report on the results of the qualitative brainstorming phase of the study. Participants created a list of statements reflecting what matters to them about their medications in their everyday life. The statements were de-duplicated and condensed, following which, they were thematically analyzed and mapped onto common quality of life domains. 
 Results: Twenty-two persons with mobility limitations across Canada participated in this study. Six hundred and ninety-four statements were condensed into 80 final statements. The final statements mapped onto common quality of life domains (physical health; mental health; employment/social/leisure activities; daily activities; interactions with providers; navigating the healthcare system; autonomy and decision-making; financial health) indicating a comprehensive list of items for the creation of the PROM. In addition, we identified some mobility limitation specific concepts relating to barriers to physically accessing medications and necessary testing, and to perceived health plan or policy restrictions.
 Learnings for the international audience: Results from this study emphasized the importance of including patient autonomy, decision-making and financial concerns, which are often excluded from other measures related to medication taking and QoL. Additionally, we identified other topics that matter to individuals such as impact on lifestyle activities, patient self-management, ease of access to medications and necessary testing, as well as financial challenges associated with medication taking. 
 Next Steps: The next phases of concept mapping will be conducted, which will identify statements that are important and realistic to individuals with mobility limitations and a final conceptual mapping session. Statements that are rated highly on both scales will inform the development of items for the PROM, which will be validated in future work. In developing and validating a PROM for medication-related QoL, we aim to provide clinicians with an invaluable tool to enhance and monitor clinical care and patient outcomes. We envision this PROM might be used to inform overall medication management.

Concept mapping brainstorming results for improving care transitions for adults with hip fracture in Ontario, Canada

Introduction: Individuals who have experienced a hip fracture often undergo numerous transitions in care between providers and sectors. These transitions are a time of vulnerability with the potential for poor health outcomes and experiences, yet there are limited recommendations on how to improve this care journey for adults with hip fracture.
 Target Audience: The target audience for our study include decision-makers and providers with a hip fracture portfolio, as well as patients who have experienced a hip fracture and their unpaid caregivers. 
 Who was involved: This study included patient and caregiver partners. They were involved in the grant application, study participant recruitment, data collection, and final data analysis. This study also included healthcare provider and decision-maker partners who supported participant recruitment and will be knowledge users. 
 Aims and Methods: The aim of this study was to create a list of actionable recommendations to improve care transitions for individuals with hip fracture from the perspectives of patients, caregivers, providers, and decision-makers. We used a mixed methods concept mapping approach, to gather perspectives from these key stakeholders in Ontario, Canada. Here, we report on the results of the first phase of the concept mapping study. Participants created a list of statements that they felt would improve care transitions for individuals who had experienced a hip fracture. The statements were analyzed inductively and grouped thematically. 
 Results: Thirty-two individuals participated in the brainstorming phase of this study (2 patients, 5 caregivers, 21 providers, 4 decision-makers). They created 887 statements that were condensed by the research team into 72 final statements. The final statements were grouped into seven main themes and were divided into four domains for care transition improvement. The first is the patient-related domain, which encompassed two themes: self-management and self-management-support, and rehabilitation therapy and activities. The second domain is provider-related and includes: healthcare provider skills and communication and trust. The third domain includes two system-related themes: continuity of care and health system efficiencies. The last domain relates to care processes with one theme: transition planning and follow up care. 
 Learnings for the international audience: Previous literature on improving care transitions has had focused primarily on the transfer of information between care providers with little emphasis on the caregiver/patient role. Our results, however, highlight the importance of meaningful patient and caregiver engagement, with active involvement in all aspects of care including the transition process. Further, many statements created by our participants included policies, assessments, and care specific to individuals with hip fracture and cognitive impairment/delirium, emphasizing this as an important area for consideration when aiming to improve care transitions. 
 Next Steps: The next phases of concept mapping will be conducted, which will include statement sorting and rating (importance and priority). A final concept mapping session will be held integrating the qualitative and quantitative data and an opportunity to reflect on the findings with key stakeholders. Statements that are rated highly importance and priority will inform actionable recommendations to improve care transitions for hip fracture.

Head and neck cancer treatment outcome priorities: A multi-perspective concept mapping study.

With the increasing focus on patient-centred care, this study sought to understand priorities considered by patients and healthcare providers from their experience with head and neck cancer treatment, and to compare how patients' priorities compare to healthcare providers' priorities. Group concept mapping was used to actively identify priorities from participants (patients and healthcare providers) in two phases. In phase one, participants brainstormed statements reflecting considerations related to their experience with head and neck cancer treatment. In phase two, statements were sorted based on their similarity in theme and rated in terms of their priority. Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis were performed to produce multidimensional maps to visualize the findings. Two-hundred fifty statements were generated by participants in the brainstorming phase, finalized to 94 statements that were included in phase two. From the sorting activity, a two-dimensional map with stress value of 0.2213 was generated, and eight clusters were created to encompass all statements. Timely care, education, and person-centred care were the highest rated priorities for patients and healthcare providers. Overall, there was a strong correlation between patient and healthcare providers' ratings (r = 0.80). Our findings support the complexity of the treatment planning process in head and neck cancer, evident by the complex maps and highly interconnected statements related to the experience of treatment. Implications for improving the quality of care delivered and care experience of head and cancer are discussed.

Key terms and definitions in acute porphyrias: Results of an international Delphi consensus led by the European porphyria network.

Acute porphyrias are a group of rare inherited disorders causing acute neurovisceral attacks. Many terms used frequently in the literature and clinical practice are ambiguous, which can lead to confusion in the way patients are managed, studied, and reported in clinical studies. Agreed definitions are a necessary first step in developing management guidelines and will facilitate communication of results of future clinical research. The Delphi method was used to generate consensus on key terms and definitions in acute porphyria. The process started with a brainstorming phase offered to all members of the European Porphyria Network followed by two Delphi rounds among international experts in the field of porphyria (the Acute Porphyria Expert Panel). A consensus of 75% or more was defined as the agreement threshold. A total of 63 respondents from 26 countries participated in the brainstorming phase, leading to the choice of nine terms and definitions. A total of 34 experts were invited to take part in the Delphi rounds. Seven of the initial nine terms and definitions which entered the first Delphi round achieved the threshold for agreement. Following a second Delphi round, all nine definitions achieved agreement.Agreement on the definitions for nine important terms describing acute porphyrias represents a significant step forward for the porphyria community. It will facilitate more accurate comparison of outcomes among porphyria centres and in clinical trials and provide a strong framework for developing evidence-based clinical guidelines.

Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in thoracic surgery: an international needs assessment.

To identify and prioritize technical procedures for simulation-based training to be integrated into the thoracic surgical curriculum. A 3-round Delphi survey was conducted from February 2022 to June 2022 among 34 key opinion leaders in thoracic surgery from 14 countries worldwide. The 1st round was a brainstorming phase to identify technical procedures that a newly qualified thoracic surgeon should be able to perform. All the suggested procedures were categorized, qualitatively analysed and sent to the 2nd round. The second round investigated: the frequency of the identified procedure at each institution, the number of thoracic surgeons that should be able to perform these procedures, the degree of risk to the patient if the procedure is performed by a non-competent thoracic surgeon and the feasibility of simulation-based education. In the 3rd round, elimination and re-ranking of the procedures from the 2nd round were performed. Response rates in the 3 iterative rounds were 80% (28 out of 34), 89% (25 out of 28) and 100% (25 out of 25) in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd round, respectively. Seventeen technical procedures were included for simulation-based training in the final prioritized list. The top 5 procedures were Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) lobectomy, VATS segmentectomy, VATS mediastinal lymph node dissection, diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery port placement, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery docking and undocking. The prioritized list of procedures represents a consensus of key thoracic surgeons worldwide. These procedures are suitable for simulation-based training and should be integrated in the thoracic surgical curriculum.

The Problem Faced by Freshmen Students of English Education Department In Writing English Paragraph

This research is aimed to reveal new students’ obstacle in doing paragraph writing; from the pre-writing activity, writing process and also editing. Descriptive qualitative was done to conduct this research. The researchers used interview to collect data and also to verify the result of the data by doing observation on student’s work in writing process. After the results revealed, it is hoped that they are useful for teachers and also students to know the problem they probably face in paragraph writing teaching and also learning, therefore they can anticipate the problem and find solution to those obstacles. The result of this research shows that the students face difficulties in determining topic, main idea, and also the rest of content, grammatical error, vocabulary difficulty, making brainstorming phase, forgot or confused to determine conclusion, punctuation, translation and coherence problem, mistake in language (sentence structure, spelling and word choice).

Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of patient-centered care in cardiogenetics: a Delphi study among ERN GUARD-heart members.

Current clinical practice regarding inherited cardiac conditions has a biomedical focus, while psychological and social expertize and capacity are often lacking. As patient-centered care entails a multidisciplinary approach, the present study (a) explores barriers and facilitators of implementing patient-centered care in cardiogenetics and (b) contrasts various stakeholder viewpoints and perceived influence. We performed a three-round modified Delphi study using the input of a virtual expert panel comprising 25 medical professionals, 9 psychosocial professionals working in cardiogenetics, and 6 patient representatives. In round 1, the brainstorming phase and workshop breakout sessions were transcribed verbatim, coded and processed into unique statements listed as barriers and facilitators. In round 2, we asked the expert panel to validate, add or revise the list of barriers and facilitators. In round 3, the most relevant barriers and facilitators were ranked in importance. The experts identified 6 barriers dispersed across various levels of implementation. Having a blind spot for the patient perspective was of the highest importance, while the lack of multidisciplinary communication was ranked the lowest. We selected 9 facilitators: 2 were workflow related, 5 advocated various aspects of increased multidisciplinarity, and 2 suggested improvements in patient communication. This study revealed health system and organizational barriers and facilitators predominantly in implementing patient-centered care and only some patient-level factors. Some barriers and facilitators may be addressed easily (e.g., improving communication), while others may prove more complicated (e.g., biomedical thinking). Close interdisciplinary collaboration seems to be needed to implement PCC in cardiogenetics successfully.

Developing Priorities to Alleviate the Long-Term Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Women Engaged in Diabetes Research, Education, and Care: A Concept Mapping Study.

The aim of this study was to develop priorities through stakeholder engagement to alleviate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the professional careers of women engaged in diabetes research, education, and care. This study used concept mapping, a mixed-methods, multistep process, to generate a conceptual map of recommendations through the following steps: 1) identify stakeholders and develop the focus prompt, 2) generate ideas through brainstorming, 3) structure ideas through sorting and rating on priority and likelihood, 4) analyze the data and create a cluster map, and 5) interpret and use results. Fifty-two participants completed the brainstorming phase, and 24 participated in sorting and rating. The final concept map included seven clusters. Those rated as highest priority were to ensure supportive workplace culture (μ = 4.43); promote practices to achieve gender parity in hiring, workload, and promotion (μ = 4.37); and increase funding opportunities and allow extensions (μ = 4.36). This study identified recommendations for institutions to better support women engaged in diabetes-related work to alleviate the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their careers. Some areas were rated as high in priority and high in likelihood, such as ensuring a supportive workplace culture. In contrast, family-friendly benefits and policies were rated as high in priority but low in likelihood of being implemented; these may take more effort to address, including coordinated efforts within institutions (e.g., women's academic networks) and professional societies to promote standards and programs that advance gender equity in medicine.

Development of a Quality Management Model and Self-assessment Questionnaire for Hybrid Health Care: Concept Mapping Study.

BackgroundWorking with eHealth requires health care organizations to make structural changes in the way they work. Organizational structure and process must be adjusted to provide high-quality care. This study is a follow-up study of a systematic literature review on optimally organizing hybrid health care (eHealth and face to face) using the Donabedian Structure-Process-Outcome (SPO) framework to translate the findings into a modus operandi for health care organizations.ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop an SPO-based quality assessment model for organizing hybrid health care using an accompanying self-assessment questionnaire. Health care organizations can use this model and a questionnaire to manage and improve their hybrid health care.MethodsConcept mapping was used to enrich and validate evidence-based knowledge from a literature review using practice-based knowledge from experts. First, brainstorming was conducted. The participants listed all the factors that contributed to the effective organization of hybrid health care and the associated outcomes. Data from the brainstorming phase were combined with data from the literature study, and duplicates were removed. Next, the participants rated the factors on importance and measurability and grouped them into clusters. Finally, using multivariate statistical analysis (multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis) and group interpretation, an SPO-based quality management model and an accompanying questionnaire were constructed.ResultsAll participants (n=39) were familiar with eHealth and were health care professionals, managers, researchers, patients, or eHealth suppliers. The brainstorming and literature review resulted in a list of 314 factors. After removing the duplicates, 78 factors remained. Using multivariate statistical analyses and group interpretations, a quality management model and questionnaire incorporating 8 clusters and 33 factors were developed. The 8 clusters included the following: Vision, strategy, and organization; Quality information technology infrastructure and systems; Quality eHealth application; Providing support to health care professionals; Skills, knowledge, and attitude of health care professionals; Attentiveness to the patient; Patient outcomes; and Learning system. The SPO categories were positioned as overarching themes to emphasize the interrelations between the clusters. Finally, a proposal was made to use the self-assessment questionnaire in practice, allowing measurement of the quality of each factor.ConclusionsThe quality of hybrid care is determined by organizational, technological, process, and personal factors. The 33 most important factors were clustered in a quality management model and self-assessment questionnaire called the Hybrid Health Care Quality Assessment. The model visualizes the interrelations between the factors. Using a questionnaire, each factor can be assessed to determine how effectively it is organized and developed over time. Health care organizations can use the Hybrid Health Care Quality Assessment to identify improvement opportunities for solid and sustainable hybrid health care.

The knowledge and skills needed to perform intestinal ultrasound for inflammatory bowel diseases-an international Delphi consensus survey.

SummaryBackgroundIntestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non‐invasive modality for monitoring disease activity in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). IUS training currently lacks well‐defined standards and international consensus on competency criteria. Aim: To achieve international consensus on what competencies should be expected from a newly certified IUS practitioner.MethodsA three‐round, iterative Delphi process was conducted among 54 IUS experts from 17 countries. Round 1 was a brainstorming phase with an open‐ended question to identify the knowledge and skills that experts believe a newly certified IUS practitioner should possess. The experts' suggestions were then organised into statements by a Steering Committee. In round 2, the experts commented upon and rated the statements, which were revised accordingly. In round 3, the experts rated the revised statements. Statements meeting the pre‐defined consensus criterion of at least 70% agreement were included in the final list of statements.ResultsIn total, 858 items were suggested by the experts in the first round. Based on these suggestions, 55 statements were organised into three categories: knowledge, technical skills and interpretation skills. After the second round, 53 revised statements remained. After the final round, a total of 41 statements had achieved consensus.ConclusionsWe established international, expert consensus on the knowledge and skills that should be expected from newly certified IUS practitioners. These consensus statements are the first step towards mastery learning for IUS training. Educators can utilise these statements to design training programmes and evaluate the competencies of trainees before they engage in independent practice.

P287 The knowledge and skills needed to perform intestinal ultrasound – An international Delphi consensus survey

Abstract Background Intestinal Ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive modality for monitoring disease activity in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). IUS training currently lacks well-defined standards and international consensus on IUS competency criteria. Hence, the aim of this study was to achieve international consensus on what competencies should be expected from a newly certified IUS practitioner. Methods A three-round iterative Delphi process was conducted among 54 IUS experts from across 17 countries. Round 1 was a brainstorming phase with an open-ended question to identify the knowledge and skills that the experts believed a newly certified IUS practitioner should have. The experts’ suggestions were summarised and organised into statements by a Steering Committee. Round 2 allowed the experts to provide comments and to rate the statements on a five-point Likert scale by level of agreement, i.e., how much they agreed or disagreed that a newly certified IUS practitioner should have a specific knowledge or skill. Statements were revised based on the comments and ratings from the experts. In round 3, the experts re-rated the revised statements. Statements achieving the pre-defined consensus-criterion (at least 70% agreement) were included in the final list of consensus statements. Results 858 items were suggested by the experts in first round. Based on the suggested items, 55 statements were summarised and organised into three categories; knowledge, technical skills and interpretation skills. After the second round, two statements were merged and one statement was excluded, leaving 53 revised statements. After the third and final Delphi round, a total of 41 statements were included in the final list of consensus statements. Conclusion We established an international consensus on the knowledge and skills that should be expected from a newly certified IUS practitioner. The inception of these consensus statements is the first step in the process of developing training standards. Educators can utilize these consensus statements to guide them in designing training programs and in evaluating the competencies of trainees before they engage in independent practice.

Influences on HPV vaccination across levels of the social ecological model: perspectives from state level stakeholders

ABSTRACT Nationally, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates fall short of the Healthy People 2020 goal of 80% completion. Although strategies to increase these rates exist, low rates persist. We used concept mapping with state-level stakeholders to better understand barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination. Concept mapping is a participatory research process in which respondents brainstorm ideas to a prompt and then sort ideas into piles. We present results of the brainstorming phase. We recruited participants identified by researchers’ professional connections (n = 134) via e-mail invitations from five states (Iowa, South Dakota, Minnesota, Oregon, and Washington) working in adolescent health, sexual health, cancer prevention and control, or immunization. Using Concept Systems’ online software we solicited participants’ beliefs about what factors have the greatest influence on HPV vaccination rates in their states. From the original sample 58.2% (n = 78) of participants completed the brainstorming activity and generated 372 statements, our team removed duplicates and edited statements for clarity, which resulted in 172 statements. We coded statements using the Social Ecological Model (SEM) to understand at what level factors affecting HPV vaccination are occurring. There were 53 statements at the individual level, 22 at the interpersonal level, 21 in community, 51 in organizational, and 25 in policy. Our results suggest that a tiered approach, utilizing multi-level interventions instead of focusing on only one level may have the most benefit. Moreover, the policy-level influences identified by participants may be difficult to modify, thus efforts should focus on implementing evidence-based interventions to have the most meaningful impact.

Practitioners' perspectives on ethical issues within the treatment of eating disorders: Results from a concept mapping study.

Treating patients with eating disorders (EDs) is associated with an array of ethical concerns, including balancing patients' health and autonomy, access to care, and use of harm-reduction versus recovery-oriented treatment models. The primary aim of the current study is to gain a better understanding of ethical issues faced by ED practitioners by using a concept mapping, or Q-sort, approach. A total of 12 practitioners completed the brainstorming phase and generated statements regarding ethical issues they faced while treating patients with EDs. A subsequent 38 practitioners completed a sorting task, where they created and labeled piles, into which they grouped each statement. Of those 38 participants, 30 rated both the frequency with which they encountered each ethical issue and its impact on patient care. A total of six clusters emerged: Insufficient Level of Care, Lack of Evidence-Based Practice, Insurance Barriers, Family Involvement, Patient Autonomy, and Limited Access to Expertise. Lack of Evidence-Based Practice, Insurance Barriers, and Insufficient Level of Care was the most frequent problem faced by ED practitioners, whereas Insurance Barriers and Patient Autonomy had the greatest impact. Findings outline frequent and impactful areas of ethical concern that arise when treating patients diagnosed with EDs. Practitioners most commonly reported that patient- and insurance-driven factors limited patient access to appropriate care. Regulations supporting the provision of evidence-based care should be emphasized in public health policy and advocacy efforts, given their impact in limiting the delivery of adequate patient care.

Consensus on technical procedures in radiology to include in simulation-based training for residents: a European-wide needs assessment.

To identify and prioritize technical procedures for simulation-based training that should be part of the education of residents in radiology. This European-wide needs assessment study used a modified Delphi technique to gather consensus from different key education stakeholders in the field. The first round was a brainstorming phase to identify all procedures that a newly specialized radiologist should potentially be able to do. In the second round, each procedure was explored for the need for simulation training; the participants determined frequency, number of radiologists performing the procedure, impact on patient comfort and safety, and feasibility of simulation. The result of this round was sent back to the participants for final evaluation and prioritization. Seventy-one key education stakeholders from 27 European countries agreed to participate and were actively involved in the Delphi process: response rates were 72% and 82% in the second and third round, respectively. From 831 suggested procedures in the first round, these were grouped and categorized into 34 procedures that were pre-prioritized in the second round according to the need for simulation-based training. In the third round, 8 procedures were eliminated resulting in final inclusion of 26 procedures. Ultrasound procedures were highly ranked including basic skills such as probe handling; abdominal ultrasound; and ultrasound of kidneys, retroperitoneum, intestines, and scrotum. The prioritized list of procedures represents a consensus document decided upon by educational stakeholders in radiology across Europe. These procedures are suitable for simulation and should be an integral part of the education of radiologists. • The 26 identified procedures are listed according to priority and should be included as an integral part of simulation-based training curricula of radiologists across Europe. • This needs assessment is only the first step towards developing standardized simulation-based training programs that support the harmonization of education and training across Europe.

Patient and caregiver experience in the transition from hospital to home - brainstorming results from group concept mapping: a patient-oriented study.

Improving the quality of care for patients who return home after a hospital stay is an international priority; however, few jurisdictions have engaged broadly with patients and caregivers to understand what most affects their experience transitioning home. We performed Ontario-wide group concept mapping, beginning with a brainstorming phase, to understand patient and caregiver priorities in the transition. We used group concept mapping to engage patients and caregivers who had lived experience transitioning from hospital to home in Ontario in the previous 3 years. We report on the first phase, brainstorming, conducted over 10 weeks beginning Jan. 11, 2018 via an online survey or facilitated group discussion. Participants responded to a single focal prompt: "When leaving the hospital for home, some thing(s) that affected the experience were: ____." The study team identified recurrent concepts and overarching themes. Patients and caregivers informed the study design, recruitment and data interpretation. In all, 665 people (263 patients [39.5%], 352 caregivers [52.9%] and 50 people who were both patient and caregiver [7.5%]) participated in brainstorming online, and 71 people participated in 1 of 8 group discussions. Participants identified 6 key areas affecting their experience of transition from hospital to home: home and community care, the discharge process, medical follow-up after discharge, medications, patient and caregiver education, and the kindness and caring of the health care team in hospital. Most notable were challenges with the timeliness, sufficiency, reliability and consistency of publicly funded home care services. Patients and caregivers from across Ontario noted a range of issues affecting their experience transitioning from hospital to home, particularly the quality and sufficiency of publicly funded home care. Our findings will be used to inform a provincial quality standard on the transition from hospital to home.

A playwriting technique to engage on a shared reflective enquiry about the social sustainability of robotization and artificial intelligence

This work was developed to implement and apply a theatre playwriting technique for an art-based research in the domain of social sustainability of artificial intelligence and robotization. The use of artistic media, instead of the prevalent technical and normative approaches to sustainability, allows to develop a reflective aesthetic enquiry, supporting a “learning by heart”, that should parallel analytical thinking. First, some key methodological elements to be applied to the playwriting process were defined. In particular, the process of interactive meaning-making among researchers, the multisensory knowing as forms of expression of the self and creativity and the experience of action. Moreover, the integration scientific knowledge, the communication of complexity and the focus of feelings, as element of authenticity, were considered. The methodological elements were integrated into the writing process of “The Wizard of RobOz”, inspired by Baum’s novel, “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz”. The play focused on human identity, in contrast to robot identity. Feelings (altruism and love) emerged as the core of good choices. The contrast between human and non-human agents, was, then, resolved considering the importance of design in obtaining a good integration between the two worlds. The topic of the play is relevant at societal level, due to the foreseen transition to a “society 5.0”, where humans and non-human agents will have to be integrated. The evaluation phase showed that a coherent and structure story was generated though the fixed technique. However, the perceived authenticity and resonance evaluation should be implemented with further work. The focus on social sustainability of robotization and AI constituted a novelty with respect to previous works, which only investigated the technological application of robots to theatre. the use of a scientific literature review to support the brainstorming phase served to implement the integration between science and art. Another element of innovation was the use of professional performers, instead than scientists. In parallel, this play allowed to apply an open source robot design, building and programming for theatrical purpose. The large participation of public to the representation showed the potentiality to transfer this playwriting technique into the domains of new education and communication projects. However, it would be recommended to integrate, within the research and meaning-making process, the other dimensions of sustainability, as well as a relevant presence of ethical reasoning.

Promoting interdisciplinary research to respond to public health crises: The response of the Columbia University CTSA to the opioid crisis.

Effectively addressing public health crises requires dynamic and nimble interdisciplinary collaborations across the translational spectrum, from bench to clinic to community. The Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program hubs are uniquely suited to facilitate interdisciplinary collaborations across universities and academic medical centers. This paper describes the activities at the Columbia University CTSA Program hub to address a current public health crisis, the opioid epidemic. Columbia's CTSA Program hub led a three-phase approach, based on the Conceptual Model of Transdisciplinary Scientific Collaboration as described by Stokols et al.: (1) a university-wide planning and brainstorming phase to identify key leaders across many domains who are influential in addressing the opioid epidemic, (2) a campus-wide and community outreach to identify all interested parties, and (3) ongoing targeted support for collaboration development. Preliminary metrics of success are interdisciplinary collaborations and grant funding. We describe recent examples of how interdisciplinary collaboration, academic-community partnership, and pilot funding contributed to the development and funding of innovative interdisciplinary research, including the New York site of the HEALing Communities initiative. The processes are now being used to support interdisciplinary approaches for other translational public health issues.

Identifying Technical Procedures in Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology That Should Be Integrated in a Simulation-Based Curriculum: A National General Needs Assessment in Denmark.

Simulation-based training is emerging within the orthopaedic field to alleviate the challenges that trainees face such as work-hour restrictions, limited exposure to procedures, and increasing pressures to reduce risk to patients. This training modality has grown increasingly popular over the last 2 decades. However, integration into the curriculum often fails to follow a structured educational plan. The development of simulation-based curricula should follow a structured and stepwise approach that starts with a general needs assessment. This study aimed to identify and prioritize procedures within orthopaedic surgery to be included in a simulation-based curriculum on a national basis. A national needs assessment was conducted using the Delphi method. Ninety-five experts who are involved in the training of orthopaedic surgeons from all orthopaedic departments in Denmark were selected to participate in the assessment. Round 1 was a brainstorming phase to identify technical procedures that are relevant for orthopaedic surgeons in training. Round 2 was performed on a departmental basis; it explored the frequency of procedures, the number of surgeons performing each procedure, the risk and/or discomfort to patients, and the feasibility for simulation-based training to prioritize and eliminate some of the procedures that were determined in round 1. During round 3, the experts eliminated and reprioritized procedures from round 2 to produce a final prioritized list. During the first round, 194 procedures were identified. These were reduced to 62 in round 2, and the final list after round 3 consisted of 33 prioritized procedures that are relevant for simulation-based training in orthopaedic surgery. The response rates were 63 of 95 physicians for round 1, 26 of 26 departments for round 2, and 64 of 97 physicians for round 3. The highest prioritized procedures were basic surgical techniques and principles for osteosynthesis, osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fracture, and surgical exposure of the upper and lower extremities. The prioritized list of technical procedures in orthopaedic surgery that are suitable for simulation-based training can aid in the development of a simulation-based curriculum. This article offers insights into needs assessment and curriculum development of simulation-based training in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology.

Achieving Consensus to Define Curricular Content for Simulation Based Education in Vascular Surgery: A Europe Wide Needs Assessment Initiative

To gather consensus among European educators about technical procedures that should be included in a future simulation based curriculum in vascular surgery. A three round modified Delphi survey was initiated among 189 key opinion leaders (KOL) from 34 countries across Europe who were identified according to their positions in the European Society for Vascular Surgery, the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, and Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes Section and Board of Vascular Surgery. The first round was a brainstorming phase to identify technical procedures that a newly qualified vascular surgeon should be able to perform. The answers were analysed qualitatively. The second round investigated how often the identified procedures are performed, the number of vascular surgeons that should be able to perform these procedures, whether the procedures pose a risk to the patients, and whether simulation based education (SBE) is feasible. In the third round, elimination and re-ranking of procedures were performed. Only procedures that gained more than 70% support were included. An international steering group consisting of open and endovascular surgeons and medical educators governed the process. Response rates in the three rounds were 75% (142/189), 89% (126/142), and 85% (107/126), respectively. In the final prioritised list of 30 technical procedures for SBE, the top five procedures focus on basic open vascular skills, basic endovascular skills, vascular imaging interpretation, femoral endarterectomy, and open peripheral bypass. Twenty-six procedures were eliminated, including peripheral pressure measurement, wound management, open management of complications, major amputations, and highly advanced endovascular skills. The prioritised list of technical procedures from this ESVS supported project could be used to guide planning and development of future SBE programs to meet the needs of vascular surgeons across Europe.

Achieving Consensus to Define Curricular Content for Simulation Based Education in Vascular Surgery: A Europe Wide Needs Assessment Initiative

To gather consensus among European educators about technical procedures that should be included in a future simulation based curriculum in vascular surgery. A three round modified Delphi survey was initiated among 189 key opinion leaders (KOL) from 34 countries across Europe who were identified according to their positions in the European Society for Vascular Surgery, the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, and Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes Section and Board of Vascular Surgery. The first round was a brainstorming phase to identify technical procedures that a newly qualified vascular surgeon should be able to perform. The answers were analysed qualitatively. The second round investigated how often the identified procedures are performed, the number of vascular surgeons that should be able to perform these procedures, whether the procedures pose a risk to the patients, and whether simulation based education (SBE) is feasible. In the third round, elimination and re-ranking of procedures were performed. Only procedures that gained more than 70% support were included. An international steering group consisting of open and endovascular surgeons and medical educators governed the process. Response rates in the three rounds were 75% (142/189), 89% (126/142), and 85% (107/126), respectively. In the final prioritised list of 30 technical procedures for SBE, the top five procedures focus on basic open vascular skills, basic endovascular skills, vascular imaging interpretation, femoral endarterectomy, and open peripheral bypass. Twenty-six procedures were eliminated, including peripheral pressure measurement, wound management, open management of complications, major amputations, and highly advanced endovascular skills. The prioritised list of technical procedures from this ESVS supported project could be used to guide planning and development of future SBE programs to meet the needs of vascular surgeons across Europe.