Monitoring Of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials Research Articles

Electrophysiological monitoring during basilar aneurysm operation.

Intraoperative brain stem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring was evaluated in 16 patients each undergoing intracranial operation for basilar artery aneurysm. The 16 patients had 18 posterior circulation aneurysms, including 2 patients with 2 aneurysms. Fourteen aneurysms arose from the rostral basilar artery, 2 arose from the midbasilar artery, 1 arose from the vertebrobasilar junction, and 1 arose from the proximal segment of the posterior cerebral artery. Five aneurysms were classified as giant (i.e., greater than 25 mm), and 5 aneurysms were large (i.e., 15 to 25 mm). Ten patients had BAEP and SEP monitoring, 4 had BAEP monitoring only, and 2 had SEP monitoring only. Two patients showed significant abnormalities during operation, including 1 patient with transient changes in the BAEP when the lower pons and the 8th cranial nerve were retracted. Another patient had progressive increases in latency and decreases in amplitude and subsequent loss of the SEP cortical components during a period of intermittent temporary rostral basilar artery occlusion. Wave P13 was also lost during that period. The cortical components as well as Wave P13 returned after circulation was restored. The BAEPs were unchanged in the same patient during the period of temporary basilar artery occlusion. Fourteen patients had no significant abnormalities. There were no consistent changes during the various stages of operation. BAEP and SEP monitoring failed to identify ischemic events in 4 patients with neurological findings of brain stem ischemia immediately after operation (i.e., 25% false-negative studies).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The use of brainstem auditory evoked potentials during posterior fossa surgery as a monitor of brainstem function.

Nine patients with unilateral ponto-cerebellar tumour, one with epidermoid, eight with acoustic neuroma had intraoperative monitoring of the brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) using bilateral scalp recording (Cz-A1 and Cz-A2) and binaural stimulation in order to monitor brainstem function during the surgery. Results were correlated with preoperative and postoperative BAEP findings. There was some intraoperative BAEP change in all the patients. Halothane anaesthesia caused bilateral wave V. prolongation in six patients. Lumbar drainage produced ipsilateral or bilateral wave V. prolongation in three of four patients in whom lumbar drainage was established. Opening the dura produced ipsilateral or bilateral wave V. depression or bilateral prolongation in four patients. Tumour dissection caused BAEP changes in all the patients: bilateral prolongation or depression in five patients, and ipsilateral prolongation and/or depression in six patients, three of them together with bilateral changes. The only patient who had no changes in wave I-IV. but in whom a big wave VI. appeared at the tumour side during removal, had epidermoid tumour. At the end of surgery there was some improvement in all patients, but in two the improvement was not striking: in one BAEP remained flat ipsilaterally, and in other, latency did not improve. All the patients had a good clinical recovery a few days later, but the control BAEP performed from the 3rd-7th postoperative day was not yet completely recovered in four patients. Intraoperative BAEP monitoring can be a useful technique to monitor brainstem function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potential Monitoring during Profound Hypothermia and Circulatory Arrest

The effects of decreased temperature on brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) have been previously described in mild to moderate hypothermia. This report describes BAEP monitoring during profound hypothermia (11°C) and circulatory arrest for repair of an aortic arch aneurysm. Recordings of BAEP were interpretable during cooling to 14°C, and demonstrated increasing interpeak (I-V) latency compatible with prolongation of brain stem conduction time. The changes rapidly returned to normal during rewarming from profound hypothermia, in a fashion similar to that seen after mild hypothermia, and therefore appear to be completely reversible.

Brain stem auditory evoked potentials in posterior circulation surgery.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the use of brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in 10 adult patients with vascular disorders of the posterior circulation that were treated surgically and to compare the BAEPs with the neurological findings. The vascular lesions included basilar artery stenosis in 3 patients, vertebral artery stenosis in 1 patient, brain stem/cerebellar arteriovenous malformation in 2 patients, and basilar artery aneurysm in 4 patients. Measurement of BAEPs were carried out during operation in all cases. Eight patients had BAEPs measured before operation, and 9 patients had BAEPs measured after operation. Repeat postoperative studies were performed in patients with changes in neurological status. In general, BAEP abnormalities correlated with the neurological findings before and after operation. Six patients had normal intraoperative studies. None of them had clinical findings of pontomesencephalic dysfunction after operation. Three patients with significant BAEP abnormalities during operation had neurological findings of pontomedullary ischemia after operation. Transient BAEP changes in 1 patient were thought to be the result of brain stem retraction. The BAEPs were lost in 3 patients who died. The use of BAEP measurement did not lengthen the operative procedures. However, the technique used in this study required 4 to 8 minutes for the accumulation and interpretation of each average, thereby delaying feedback to the surgeon. The results of this study suggest a potential role for BAEP monitoring in identifying brain stem injury during posterior circulation surgery.

Intraoperative monitoring of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials.

Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) were monitored during 545 neurosurgical operations in the cerebellopontine angle. The BAEP were irreversibly obliterated in five patients who required deliberate section of the auditory nerve. Technical difficulties interfered with monitoring in three cases, and three patients had deafness and absent BAEP preoperatively. Reversible alterations in BAEP were seen during 32 operations, with recovery after as long as 177 minutes of virtually complete obliteration. Changes in BAEP were associated with surgical retraction, operative manipulation, positioning of the head and neck for retromastoid craniectomy, and the combination of hypocarbia and moderate hypotension. In 19 cases, waveforms improved after specific interventions made by the surgeon or anesthesiologist because of deteriorating BAEP. In 13 other cases, BAEP recovered after maneuvers not specifically related to the electrophysiological monitoring, most often completion of operative manipulation. Whenever BAEP returned toward normal by the end of anesthesia, even after transient obliteration, hearing was preserved. Irreversible loss of BAEP occurred only when the auditory nerve was deliberately sacrificed. The authors conclude that monitoring of BAEP may help prevent injury to the auditory nerve and brain stem during operations in the cerebellopontine angle.