Melanoma Brain Metastases Research Articles

Real-world data on melanoma brain metastases and survival outcome.

Novel medical therapies have revolutionized outcome for patients with melanoma. However, patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) still have poor survival. Data are limited as these patients are generally excluded from clinical trials, wherefore real-world data on clinical outcome may support evidence-based treatment choices for patients with MBM. Patients diagnosed with MBM between 2008 and 2020 were included retrospectively. Patient characteristics, treatment, and outcome data were recorded from The Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database, pathology registries, electronic patient files, and radiation plans. Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies and the combination of BRAF/MEK-inhibitors were introduced in Denmark in 2015, and the cohort was split accordingly for comparison. A total of 527 patients were identified; 148 underwent surgical excision of MBM, 167 had stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 270 received whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), and 343 received systemic therapies. Median overall survival (mOS) for patients diagnosed with MBM before and after 2015 was 4.4 and 7.6 months, respectively. Patients receiving surgical excision as first choice of treatment had the best mOS of 10.9 months, whereas patients receiving WBRT had the worst outcome (mOS, 3.4 months). Postoperative SRS did not improve survival or local control after surgical excision of brain metastases. Of the 40 patients alive >3 years after diagnosis of MBM, 80% received immunotherapy at some point after diagnosis. Patients with meningeal carcinosis did not benefit from treatment with CPI. Outcome for patients with MBM has significantly improved after 2015, but long-term survivors are rare. Most patients alive >3 years after diagnosis of MBM received immunotherapy.

Anti-tumor treatment and healthcare consumption near death in the era of novel treatment options for patients with melanoma brain metastases

BackgroundEffective systemic treatments have revolutionized the management of patients with metastatic melanoma, including those with brain metastases. The extent to which these treatments influence disease trajectories close to death is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to gain insight into provided treatments and healthcare consumption during the last 3 months of life in patients with melanoma brain metastases.MethodsRetrospective, single-center study, including consecutive patients with melanoma brain metastases diagnosed between June-2015 and June-2018, referred to the medical oncologist, and died before November-2019. Patient and tumor characteristics, anti-tumor treatments, healthcare consumption, presence of neurological symptoms, and do-not-resuscitate status were extracted from medical charts.Results100 patients were included. A BRAF-mutation was present in 66 patients. Systemic anti-tumor therapy was given to 72% of patients during the last 3 months of life, 34% in the last month, and 6% in the last week. Patients with a BRAF-mutation more frequently received systemic treatment during the last 3 (85% vs. 47%) and last month (42% vs. 18%) of life than patients without a BRAF-mutation. Furthermore, patients receiving systemic treatment were more likely to visit the emergency room (ER, 75% vs. 36%) and be hospitalized (75% vs. 36%) than those who did not.ConclusionThe majority of patients with melanoma brain metastases received anti-tumor treatment during the last 3 months of life. ER visits and hospitalizations occurred more often in patients on anti-tumor treatment. Further research is warranted to examine the impact of anti-tumor treatments close to death on symptom burden and care satisfaction.

Neurooncological Challenges in Relapsing Intracranial Melanoma Metastases: A Case Report

Introduction: Treatment of melanoma brain metastases (MBM) is a complex interdisciplinary challenge. Relapsing MBMs pose an extra challenge due to limited therapeutic options and higher complication rate. Multiple surgical interventions and radiation can be indicated in the case of intracranial relapse with extracranial disease control under oncological therapy e.g., immunotherapy. Case Presentation: Here, we report on a 37-year-old female patient with stage IV metastatic melanoma, who underwent six neurosurgical procedures, including five tumor resections, and three courses of different irradiation protocols in 26 months, all while receiving multiple regimens of immunotherapy. Throughout the different therapies, the patient showed varying neurological deficits, including facial nerve palsy, hemiparesis and reduction of cognitive function. The patient died due to symptoms related to leptomeningeal spread of the tumor. Conclusion: With this case, we want to share our experience with multiple neurosurgical interventions and repeated brain irradiation procedures in a patient with relapsing MBM. Neurosurgical interventions contributed to symptom relief, saved steroids and potentially prolonged survival. Therefore, based on the events of this case, repeated surgery could be considered for progressive brain metastases.

Recommended first-line management of brain metastases from melanoma: A multicenter survey of clinical practice

BackgroundRadiotherapy (RT) and surgery (Sx) are effective in treating brain metastases. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown activity against asymptomatic melanoma brain metastases (MBM). BRAF/MEK inhibitors can be used to treat BRAF V600 mutation positive (BRAF+) MBM. MethodWe conducted an international survey among experts from medical oncology (MO), clinical oncology (CO), radiation oncology (RO), and neurosurgery (NS) about treatment recommendations for patients with asymptomatic BRAF+ or BRAF mutation negative (BRAF−) MBM. Eighteen specific clinical scenarios were presented and a total of 267 responses were collected. Answers were grouped and compared using Fisher’s exact test. ResultsIn most MBM scenarios, survey respondents, regardless of specialty, favored RT in addition to systemic therapy. However, for patients with BRAF+ MBM, MO and CO were significantly more likely than RO and NS to recommend BRAF/MEK inhibitors alone, without the addition of RT, including the majority of MO (51%) for patients with 1–3 MBM, all <2 cm. Likewise, for BRAF− MBM, MO and CO more commonly recommended single or dual agent ICI only and dual agent ICI therapy alone was the most common recommendation from MO or CO for MBM <2 cm. When at least 1 of 3 MBM (BRAF+ or BRAF−) was >2 cm, upfront Sx was recommended by all groups with the exception that MO and RO recommended RT for BRAF− MBM. ConclusionsIn most clinical settings involving asymptomatic MBM, experts recommended RT in addition to systemic therapy. However, recommendations varied significantly according to specialty, with MO and CO more commonly recommending dual systemic therapy alone for up to 9 BRAF− MBM <2 cm.

Malignant Melanoma-Derived Exosomes Induce Endothelial Damage and Glial Activation on a Human BBB Chip Model.

Malignant melanoma is a type of highly aggressive tumor, which has a strong ability to metastasize to brain, and 60–70% of patients die from the spread of the tumor into the central nervous system. Exosomes are a type of nano-sized vesicle secreted by most living cells, and accumulated studies have reported that they play crucial roles in brain tumor metastasis, such as breast cancer and lung cancer. However, it is unclear whether exosomes also participate in the brain metastasis of malignant melanoma. Here, we established a human blood–brain barrier (BBB) model by co-culturing human brain microvascular endothelial cells, astrocytes and microglial cells under a biomimetic condition, and used this model to explore the potential roles of exosomes derived from malignant melanoma in modulating BBB integrity. Our findings showed that malignant melanoma-derived exosomes disrupted BBB integrity and induced glial activation on the BBB chip. Transcriptome analyses revealed dys-regulation of autophagy and immune responses following tumor exosome treatment. These studies indicated malignant melanoma cells might modulate BBB integrity via exosomes, and verified the feasibility of a BBB chip as an ideal platform for studies of brain metastasis of tumors in vitro.

Surgical and anatomic factors predict development of leptomeningeal disease in patients with melanoma brain metastases.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of systemic malignancy, of which there is an unclear etiology. The aim of this study is to determine if surgical or anatomic factors can predict LMD in patients with metastatic melanoma. A retrospective chart review was performed of 1162 patients treated at single institution for melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Patients with fewer than 3 months follow-up or lacking appropriate imaging were excluded. Demographic information, surgical, and anatomic data were collected. Eight hundred and twenty-seven patients were included in the final review. On multivariate analysis for the entire cohort, female gender, dural-based and intraventricular metastasis, and tumor bordering CSF spaces were associated with increased risk of LMD. Surgical resection was not significant for risk of LMD. On multivariate analysis of patients who have undergone surgical resection of a metastatic tumor, dural-based and intraventricular metastasis, ventricular entry during surgery, and metastasis in the infratentorial space were associated with increased risk of LMD. On multivariate analysis of patients who did not undergo surgery, chemotherapy after initial diagnosis and metastasis bordering CSF spaces were associated with increased risk of LMD. In a single-institution cohort of MBM, we found that surgical resection alone did not result in an increased risk of LMD. Anatomical factors such as dural-based and intraventricular metastasis were significant for developing LMD, as well as entry into a CSF space during surgical resection. These data suggest a strong correlation between anatomic location and tumor cell seeding in relation to the development of LMD.

Volume of Disease as a Predictor for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Melanoma Brain Metastases Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Immune Checkpoint Therapy.

Purpose/ObjectivesClinical trials of anti-Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA-4) therapies have demonstrated a clinical benefit with low rates of neurologic adverse events in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs). While the combined effect of these immunotherapies (ITs) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has yielded impressive results with regard to local control (LC) and overall survival (OS), it has also been associated with increased rates of radiation necrosis (RN) compared to historical series of SRS alone. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with IT in combination with SRS to report on predictors of clinical outcomes.Materials and MethodsPatients were included if they had MBMs treated with SRS within 1 year of receiving anti-PD-1 and/or CTLA-4 therapy. Clinical outcomes including OS, LC, intracranial death (ID), and RN were correlated with type and timing of IT with SRS, radiation dose, total volume, and size and number of lesions treated.ResultsTwenty-nine patients with 171 MBMs were treated between May 2012 and May 2018. Patients had a median of 5 lesions treated (median volume of 6.5 cm3) over a median of 2 courses of SRS. The median dose was 21 Gy. Most patients were treated with ipilimumab (n = 13) or nivolumab-ipilimumab (n = 10). Most patients underwent SRS concurrently or within 3 months of receiving immunotherapy (n = 21). Two-year OS and LC were 54.4% and 85.5%, respectively. In addition, 14% of patients developed RN; however, only 4.7% of the total treated lesions developed RN. The median time to development of RN was 9.5 months. Patients with an aggregate tumor volume >6.5 cm3 were found to be at increased risk of ID (p = 0.05) and RN (p = 0.03). There was no difference in OS, ID, or RN with regard to type of IT, timing of SRS and IT, number of SRS courses, SRS dose, or number of cumulative lesions treated.ConclusionsIn our series, patients treated with SRS and IT for MBMs had excellent rates of OS and LC; however, patients with an aggregate tumor volume >6.5 cm3 were found to be at increased risk of ID and RN. Given the efficacy of combined anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 therapy for MBM management, further study of optimal selection criteria for the addition of SRS is warranted.

Radiomics for the noninvasive prediction of the BRAF mutation status in patients with melanoma brain metastases.

The BRAF V600E mutation is present in approximately 50% of patients with melanoma brain metastases and an important prerequisite for response to targeted therapies, particularly BRAF inhibitors. As heterogeneity in terms of BRAF mutation status may occur in melanoma patients, a wild-type extracranial primary tumor does not necessarily rule out a targetable mutation in brain metastases using BRAF inhibitors. We evaluated the potential of MRI radiomics for a noninvasive prediction of the intracranial BRAF mutation status. Fifty-nine patients with melanoma brain metastases from two university brain tumor centers (group 1, 45 patients; group 2, 14 patients) underwent tumor resection with subsequent genetic analysis of the intracranial BRAF mutation status. Preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI was manually segmented and analyzed. Group 1 was used for model training and validation, group 2 for model testing. After radiomics feature extraction, a test-retest analysis was performed to identify robust features prior to feature selection. Finally, the best performing radiomics model was applied to the test data. Diagnostic performances were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Twenty-two of 45 patients (49%) in group 1, and 8 of 14 patients (57%) in group 2 had an intracranial BRAF V600E mutation. A linear support vector machine classifier using a six-parameter radiomics signature yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.92 (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 88%) in the test data. The developed radiomics classifier allows a noninvasive prediction of the intracranial BRAF V600E mutation status in patients with melanoma brain metastases with high diagnostic performance.

Leptomeningeal disease and brain control after postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery with or without immunotherapy for resected brain metastases

PurposeImmunotherapy has shown activity in patients with brain metastases (BM) and leptomeningeal disease (LMD). We have evaluated LMD and intraparenchymal control rates for patients with resected BM receiving postoperative stereotactic...

Emergent immunotherapy approaches for brain metastases.

Brain metastases from solid tumors are increasing in incidence, especially as outcomes of systemic therapies continue to extend patients’ overall survival. The long-held notion that the brain is an immune sanctuary has now been largely refuted with increasing evidence that immunotherapy can induce durable responses in brain metastases. Single agent immune checkpoint inhibition with anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 antibodies induces durable responses in 15%–20% in melanoma brain metastases as long as patients are asymptomatic and do not require corticosteroids. The combination of anti-CTLA4 with anti-PD-1 antibodies induces an intracranial response in over 50% of asymptomatic melanoma patients, and much lower rate of otherwise durable responses (20%) in symptomatic patients or those on steroids. Data in other cancers, such as renal cell carcinoma, are accumulating indicating a role for immunotherapy. Emerging immunotherapy approaches will have to focus on increasing response rates, decreasing toxicity, and decreasing steroid dependency. The path to those advances will have to include a better understanding of the mechanisms of response and resistance to immunotherapy in brain metastases, the use of novel agents such as anti-LAG3 checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapy (oncogene directed or TKIs), and possibly surgery and SRS to improve the outcomes of patients with brain metastases.

Targeted therapy strategies for melanoma brain metastasis.

Melanoma is the most aggressive of the common forms of skin cancer. Metastasis to the central nervous system is one of the most common and deadly complications of this disease. Historically, melanoma patients with brain metastases had a median survival of less than 6 months. However, outcomes of melanoma patients have markedly improved over the last decade due to new therapeutic approaches, including immune and targeted therapies. Targeted therapies leverage the high rate of driver mutations in this disease, which result in the activation of multiple key signaling pathways. The RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway is activated in the majority of cutaneous melanomas, most commonly by point mutations in the Braf serine-threonine kinase. While most early targeted therapy studies excluded melanoma patients with brain metastases, subsequent studies have shown that BRAF inhibitors, now generally given concurrently with MEK inhibitors, achieve high rates of tumor response and disease control in Braf-mutant melanoma brain metastases (MBMs). Unfortunately, the duration of these responses is generally relatively short- and shorter than is observed in extracranial metastases. This review will summarize current data regarding the safety and efficacy of targeted therapies for MBMs and discuss rational combinatorial strategies that may improve outcomes further.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastases: dose-size response relationship in the era of immunotherapy.

Purpose/Objective(s)To determine, for intact melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), whether planning parameter peripheral dose per lesion diameter (PDLDm, Gy/mm) and lesion control (LC) differs with versus without immunotherapy (IO).Materials/MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients with intact MBM treated with SRS from 2008 to 2019. Cox-frailty models were constructed to include confounders selected by penalized Cox regression models with a LASSO selector. Interaction effect testing was used to determine whether a significant effect between IO and PDLDm could be demonstrated with respect to LC.ResultsThe study cohort comprised 67 patients with 244 MBMs treated with SRS (30 patients with 122 lesions treated with both SRS and IO) were included. The logarithm of PDLDm was selected as a predictor of LC (HR 0.307, 95% CI 0.098–0.441), adjusting for IO receipt (HR 0.363, 95% CI 0.108–1.224). Interaction effect testing demonstrated a differential effect of PDLDm by IO receipt, with respect to LC (p = 0.048). Twelve-month LC rates for a 7.5 mm lesion receiving SRS (18 Gy) with IO versus without IO were 87.8% (95% CI 69.0–98.3%) versus 79.8% (95% CI 55.1–93.8%) respectively.ConclusionPDLDm predicted LC in patients with small MBMs treated with single-fraction SRS. We found a differential effect of dose per lesion size and LC by immunotherapy receipt. Future studies are needed to determine whether lower doses of single-fraction SRS afford similarly effective LC for patients with small MBMs receiving immunotherapy.

Cabozantinib Is Effective in Melanoma Brain Metastasis Cell Lines and Affects Key Signaling Pathways.

Melanomas have a high potential to metastasize to the brain. Recent advances in targeted therapies and immunotherapies have changed the therapeutical landscape of extracranial melanomas. However, few patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) respond effectively to these treatments and new therapeutic strategies are needed. Cabozantinib is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor, already approved for the treatment of non-skin-related cancers. The drug targets several of the proteins that are known to be dysregulated in melanomas. The anti-tumor activity of cabozantinib was investigated using three human MBM cell lines. Cabozantinib treatment decreased the viability of all cell lines both when grown in monolayer cultures and as tumor spheroids. The in vitro cell migration was also inhibited and apoptosis was induced by cabozantinib. The phosphorylated RTKs p-PDGF-Rα, p-IGF-1R, p-MERTK and p-DDR1 were found to be downregulated in the p-RTK array of the MBM cells after cabozantinib treatment. Western blot validated these results and showed that cabozantinib treatment inhibited p-Akt and p-MEK 1/2. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the therapeutic potential of cabozantinib for patients with MBM.

NIMG-04. PREDICTING THE BRAF MUTATIONAL STATUS IN PATIENTS WITH MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES USING RADIOMICS - A BICENTRIC STUDY

Abstract BACKGROUND The BRAF V600E mutation is present in approximately 50% of patients with melanoma and is an important prerequisite for a response to targeted therapies such as BRAF inhibitors. In the majority of patients, the BRAF mutational status is based on the analysis of tissue samples from the extracranial primary tumor only. Since the extracranial and intracranial BRAF mutational status may be discrepant, the additional information on the BRAF mutational status of melanoma brain metastases would be of clinical value, e.g., for the prediction of response to targeted therapies. Here, we evaluated the potential of MRI radiomics for the determination of the intracranial BRAF mutational status in patients with melanoma brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-nine patients with melanoma brain metastases from two university hospitals (group 1, 45 patients; group 2, 14 patients) were operated with subsequent genetic analysis of the intracranial BRAF mutational status. All patients underwent structural MRI preoperatively. Areas of contrast enhancement were manually segmented and analyzed. Group 1 was used for model training and validation, group 2 for model testing. After image preprocessing and radiomics feature extraction, a test-retest analysis was performed to identify robust features prior to feature selection. Finally, the best performing radiomics model was applied to the test data. Diagnostic performances were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. RESULTS Twenty-two patients (49%) in group 1, and 6 patients (43%) in group 2 had an intrametastatic BRAF V600E mutation. Using the best performing six parameter radiomics signature, a linear support vector machine classifier yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.92 (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 88%) in the test data. CONCLUSION The developed radiomics classifier allows a non-invasive prediction of the intracranial BRAF V600E mutational status in patients with melanoma brain metastases and may be of value for treatment decisions.

NCMP-03. ANATOMIC AND SURGICAL FACTORS PREDICT DEVELOPMENT OF LEPTOMENINGEAL DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC MELANOMA

Abstract Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of systemic malignancy, portending a poor prognosis with an estimated median survival of 4-6 weeks if left untreated. Several reports have suggested surgical resection as a potential causative factor. Herein, we explore if surgical and anatomical factors are correlated with development of LMD in patients with melanoma brain metastases. METHODS: Patients treated at our institution between 1999-2019 for primary melanoma with brain metastasis were compiled into a database based on ICD9/10 coding. 1,079 patients with melanoma brain metastases and appropriate imaging were identified, and 834 patients with a minimum of 3 months’ follow up were included. Patients were dichotomized by development of LMD or lack thereof, and categorized into an overall cohort, and surgical and non-surgical cohorts. Anatomic factors and ventricular access during surgery were investigated as possible correlative factors for the development of LMD. RESULTS: In the overall cohort, female gender(p=0.033), presence of dural metastasis(p=0.018), presence of periventricular lesions(p&amp;lt; .001), presence of intraventricular lesions(p&amp;lt; .001), and ventricular access during surgery(p&amp;lt; .001) were significantly associated with LMD. Patients undergoing surgery, or those undergoing surgery without ventricular access, were not at higher risk of LMD. On multivariate analysis, female gender(p=.033), presence of periventricular lesions (p&amp;lt; .001), presence of intraventricular lesions(p&amp;lt; .002), and presence of dural metastasis(p=0.032) were significantly associated with development of LMD. In patients who had surgery, iatrogenic ventricular access(p&amp;lt; .001) was significantly correlated with LMD. In the group of patients without surgery, those with periventricular lesions had significantly higher odds of LMD(p&amp;lt; .001). CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective cohort of patients with melanoma metastatic to the brain, surgical intervention does not increase odds of LMD; however, iatrogenic access to the CSF space during surgery is highly correlated with LMD development. Anatomic contact with the CSF space predicts LMD regardless of surgical status.

NCMP-21. IMMUNE-RELATED ACUTE MOTOR AXONAL NEUROPATHY: A SMALL CASE SERIES AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Abstract BACKGROUND Immunotherapy revolutionized cancer treatment in the past decade, with a significant increased survival in patients with solid tumors. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been associated with a growing number of neurotoxicities, some of which can be fatal if not recognized and treated promptly. Some of these neurotoxicities include very uncommon syndromes like Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy (AMAN). Herein we present four oncological cases of patients who underwent immunotherapy and developed AMAN. METHODS Four patients were diagnosed with immune-related AMAN between 2017 and 2000 at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center. Patients were treated with standard of care. RESULTS We describe four oncological patients who developed a motor axonal neuropathy (i.e., AMAN) confirmed on nerve conduction studies following 2 cycles of immunotherapy, including a 28 year old woman with melanoma brain metastasis and a 50 year old woman with renal cell carcinoma both treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab, a 32 year old man with Hodgkin lymphoma who was treated with nivolumab and brentuximab, and a 77 year old woman with renal urothelial cancer who was treated with pembrolizumab and cabozantinib. All four patients were promptly recognized as having immune-related neurotoxicity (irNs), were promptly treated (i.e., high dose steroids +/- IVIG +/- other immunomodulators), and significantly improved and have remained stable. CONCLUSION This is the first case series of patients with AMAN following two cycles of immunotherapy, who were successfully treated. It is crucial to develop a better understanding of irNs, including those rare conditions that are difficult to diagnose and treat, as the utilization of these immunomodulating therapies continues to expand to include other solid malignancies. Neurologists should be involved early on in any case of suspected irN to assist in the management of these complicated patients and a swift work up should be initiated for timely diagnosis and treatment.

Genomic and Transcriptomic Profiling of Brain Metastases.

Simple SummaryBrain metastases (BM) are the most common brain tumors in adults and are the main cause of cancer-associated death. Omics analysis of BM will allow for a better understanding of metastatic progression, prognosis and therapeutic targeting. In this study, BM samples underwent comprehensive molecular profiling with genomics and transcriptomics. Mutational signatures suggested that most mutations were gained prior to metastasis. A novel copy number event centered around the MCL1 gene was found in 75% of all samples. Transcriptomics revealed that melanoma BM formed a distinct cluster in comparison to other subtypes. Poor survival correlated to self-identified black race and absence of radiation treatment but not molecular profiles. These data identify potential new drivers of brain metastatic progression, implicate that melanoma BM are distinctive and likely responsive to unique therapies, and further investigation of sociodemographic and clinical features are needed in BM cohorts.Brain metastases (BM) are the most common brain tumors in adults occurring in up to 40% of all cancer patients. Multi-omics approaches allow for understanding molecular mechanisms and identification of markers with prognostic significance. In this study, we profile 130 BM using genomics and transcriptomics and correlate molecular characteristics to clinical parameters. The most common tumor origins for BM were lung (40%) followed by melanoma (21%) and breast (15%). Melanoma and lung BMs contained more deleterious mutations than other subtypes (p < 0.001). Mutational signatures suggested that the bulk of the mutations were gained before metastasis. A novel copy number event centered around the MCL1 gene was found in 75% of all samples, suggesting a broader role in promoting metastasis. Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis of transcriptional signatures available in 65 samples based on the hallmarks of cancer revealed four distinct clusters. Melanoma samples formed a distinctive cluster in comparison to other BM subtypes. Characteristics of molecular profiles did not correlate with survival. However, patients with self-identified black race or those who did not receive radiation correlated with poor survival. These data identify potential new drivers of brain metastatic progression. Our data also suggest further investigation of sociodemographic and clinical features is needed in BM cohorts.

Value of screening and follow-up brain MRI scans in patients with metastatic melanoma.

BackgroundNovel treatments make long‐term survival possible for subsets of patients with melanoma brain metastases. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may aid in early detection of brain metastases and inform treatment decisions. This study aimed to determine the impact of screening MRI scans in patients with metastatic melanoma and follow‐up MRI scans in patients with melanoma brain metastases.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma or melanoma brain metastases between June 2015 and January 2018. The impact of screening MRI scans was evaluated in the first 2 years after metastatic melanoma diagnosis. The impact of follow‐up MRI scans was examined in the first year after brain metastases diagnosis. The number of MRI scans, scan indications, scan outcomes, and changes in treatment strategy were analyzed.ResultsIn total, 116 patients had no brain metastases at the time of the metastatic melanoma diagnosis. Twenty‐eight of these patients (24%) were subsequently diagnosed with brain metastases. Screening MRI scans detected the brain metastases in 11/28 patients (39%), of which 8 were asymptomatic at diagnosis. In the 96 patients with melanoma brain metastases, treatment strategy changed after 75/168 follow‐up MRI scans (45%). In patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, the number of treatment changes after follow‐up MRI scans was lower when patients had been treated longer.Conclusion(s)Screening MRI scans aid in early detection of melanoma brain metastases, and follow‐up MRI scans inform treatment strategy. In patients with brain metastases responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors, treatment changes were less frequently observed after follow‐up MRI scans. These results can inform the development of brain imaging protocols for patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor sensitive tumors.

Brain Metastases in Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma: Patterns of Care and Clinical Outcomes in the Era of Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) and BRAF inhibitors (BIs) are standard treatments for metastatic melanoma and have intracranial activity against melanoma brain metastases (MBMs). However, optimal use of CPI/BI with radiation therapy (RT) is not well established. This study evaluates the current practice pattern of how these systemic therapies are chosen and combined with either whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for MBMs. The study also examines if upfront SRS+CPI results in superior intracranial control (IC) than upfront SRS without CPI or upfront CPI/BI followed by salvage RT.Patients with MBMs who received their first course of intracranial RT with between 1/2014 and 12/2019 at a tertiary cancer center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with leptomeningeal disease and MBMs from non-cutaneous melanoma were excluded. Prior exposure before MBM diagnosis and concomitant use of CPIs/BIs within 3 months of RT were evaluated. Binary logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of SRS or CPI use. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association with IC, which was calculated from the time of MBM diagnosis to the first intracranial progression after upfront MBM treatment.A total of 123 patients with MBMs with a median age of 61 (IQR: 51-69) were identified, and 55% were BRAF-mutant. There were 75 patients (61%) with 1-4 MBMs, 31 patients (25%) with 5-10 MBMs, and 17 (14%) patients with > 10 MBMs. Before MBM diagnosis, 30% had prior CPI and 18% had prior BI. For the upfront MBM treatment, 64% received SRS (66% with CPI and 23% with BI), 27% received WBRT (42% with CPI and 30% with BI), 9% received upfront CPI/BI. The baseline characteristics were balanced between the patients who received upfront SRS and upfront CPI/BI except patients who received upfront CPI/BI were more likely to have a BRAF mutation (82% vs. 49%, P = 0.04). The median follow-up was 8.7 mo (IQR: 2.8-22) for all patients and 32 mo (IQR: 18-45) for living patients. For patients who received upfront CPI/BI, 73% underwent salvage SRS and 27% with salvage WBRT at a median of 5.7 mos [IQR: 3.0-7.7] after MBM diagnosis. Fewer number of MBMs, higher KPS, and craniotomy were significant predictors of SRS use on multivariable logistic regression. For the upfront SRS cohort, treatment after 2016, BRAF-wild type status, and prior CPI exposure were associated with higher likelihood of concomitant CPI use with SRS. After adjusting for the number of MBMs, upfront SRS+CPI was associated with higher IC than upfront SRS without CPI (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.22-0.84, P = 0.02). Upfront SRS+ CPI also trended towards a higher IC than upfront CPI/BI with salvage RT (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.27-1.1, P = 0.07) after adjusting for the number of MBMs.Upfront SRS with concomitant CPI was the most frequently used approach to treat newly diagnosed favorable MBMs and may yield superior IC than upfront SRS without CPI or upfront CPI/BI.R. Chin: None. K. Chen: None. C.D. Abraham: None. C.G. Robinson: Research Grant; Varian. Consultant; Varian, AstraZeneca, EMD Serono. Advisory Board; Radialogica. Stock Options; Radialogica. S.M. Perkins: I serve on the Medical Advisory Committee for Mevion Medical Systems and receive compensation for this role.; Mevion Medical Systems. T.M. Johanns: None. L.F. Hernandez-Aya: None. J.W. Keller: None. J. Dowling: None. K. Rich: None. M. Chicoine: None. A.H. Kim: None. G.P. Dunn: None. G. Ansstas: None. J. Huang: None.

Outcomes of Immunotherapy (ICI) Alone vs. Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) Alone vs. ICI and SRS Combined in Melanoma Brain Metastasis

Purpose/Objective(s)Melanoma is the third most common cause of metastatic brain tumors. Both Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) and Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) have been used as first line treatment for melanoma brain metastasis (MBM). The efficacy of ICIs alone, SRS alone, or SRS and ICIs combined as treatment is being evaluated. We hypothesize that a combination of SRS and ICIs will lead to an improvement in Overall Survival (OS), when compared to either alone, for patients with MBM.Materials/MethodsPatients with MBM treated at our tertiary care center (2010-2020) with either ICIs, SRS, or both were evaluated. OS was measured from initiation of immunotherapy or SRS of MBM to date of death or last follow up. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine differences in OS.Results368 patients with MBM were included. Of these, 62 were treated with ICIs alone, 151 were treated with SRS alone, and 155 were treated with a combination of ICIs and SRS. For treatment with ICIs alone, the median age at diagnosis was 61 years (Interquartile range (IQR) 26-89), 70% of the patients were male, and 97% were white. For treatment with SRS alone the median age at diagnosis was 59 years (IQR 24-88), 58% of the patients were male, and 100% were white. For ICIs/SRS combination treatment, the median age at diagnosis was 63 years (IQR 23-87), 65% of the patients were male, and 98% were white. Overall Survival for patients treated with ICIs alone, SRS alone, and ICIs/SRS combined had a median of 24.2, 14.5, and 56.1 months and a 2 year rate of 50%, 35%, and 72%, respectively. With ICI treatment alone as a reference, SRS treatment alone had an OS hazard ratio, HR = 1.34 (95% CI = 0.96 – 1.89, P = 0.088), and ICI/SRS combination treatment had an OS hazard ratio, HR = 0.57 (95% CI = 0.40 – 0.81, P = 0.002).ConclusionIn patients with MBM, treatment with both ICIs and SRS was associated with an increase in Overall Survival when compared to treatment with either ICIs alone or SRS alone. Further studies need to be done to control for other patient variables such as KPS/ECOG, number of lesions, and extra-cranial metastasis. Melanoma is the third most common cause of metastatic brain tumors. Both Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) and Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) have been used as first line treatment for melanoma brain metastasis (MBM). The efficacy of ICIs alone, SRS alone, or SRS and ICIs combined as treatment is being evaluated. We hypothesize that a combination of SRS and ICIs will lead to an improvement in Overall Survival (OS), when compared to either alone, for patients with MBM. Patients with MBM treated at our tertiary care center (2010-2020) with either ICIs, SRS, or both were evaluated. OS was measured from initiation of immunotherapy or SRS of MBM to date of death or last follow up. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine differences in OS. 368 patients with MBM were included. Of these, 62 were treated with ICIs alone, 151 were treated with SRS alone, and 155 were treated with a combination of ICIs and SRS. For treatment with ICIs alone, the median age at diagnosis was 61 years (Interquartile range (IQR) 26-89), 70% of the patients were male, and 97% were white. For treatment with SRS alone the median age at diagnosis was 59 years (IQR 24-88), 58% of the patients were male, and 100% were white. For ICIs/SRS combination treatment, the median age at diagnosis was 63 years (IQR 23-87), 65% of the patients were male, and 98% were white. Overall Survival for patients treated with ICIs alone, SRS alone, and ICIs/SRS combined had a median of 24.2, 14.5, and 56.1 months and a 2 year rate of 50%, 35%, and 72%, respectively. With ICI treatment alone as a reference, SRS treatment alone had an OS hazard ratio, HR = 1.34 (95% CI = 0.96 – 1.89, P = 0.088), and ICI/SRS combination treatment had an OS hazard ratio, HR = 0.57 (95% CI = 0.40 – 0.81, P = 0.002). In patients with MBM, treatment with both ICIs and SRS was associated with an increase in Overall Survival when compared to treatment with either ICIs alone or SRS alone. Further studies need to be done to control for other patient variables such as KPS/ECOG, number of lesions, and extra-cranial metastasis.