Donation After Brain Death Research Articles

Machine Perfusion or Straight to Transplant? Predictive Value of Flavin Mononucleotide Levels in Flush Solution of Human Liver Allograft.

This study examined the predictive value of Flavin Mononucleotide (FMN) levels in the flush solution used during cold storage of donor livers on outcomes post-transplantation. Static cold storage for liver grafts induces hypoxia with subsequent impaired mitochondrial function and Flavin Mononucleotide (FMN) release upon reperfusion. This study enrolled 62 recipients who received whole liver grafts from donation after brain death (n=50) and circulatory death donors (n=12) between June 2022 and July 2023. FMN concentrations were measured in flush solutions on the back-table. ROC-curve analysis identified an FMN level cut-off for graft survival. Post-transplant outcomes were examined according to FMN levels. FMN level was significantly associated with graft survival, with an area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.858 (95%CI: 0.754-0.963, P<0.001), outperforming the donor risk index (AUC 0.571, 95%CI: 0.227-0.915, P=0.686). The study cohort was divided into low-FMN (<37.5ng/mL, n=40) and high-FMN groups (≥37.5ng/mL, n=22). The low-FMN group had superior one-year graft survival compared with the high-FMN group (100% vs. 77%, P=0.003). Levels of transaminases within 7 days post-transplant were significantly higher in the high-FMN group (P=0.003). The high-FMN group developed acute rejections (41% vs. 15%, P=0.023) and early allograft dysfunction (50% vs. 20%, P=0.014) more frequently. Median comprehensive complication index in the high-FMN group was significantly higher (54 [interquartile range, 40-78] vs. 42 [interquartile range, 28-52], P=0.017). The FMN level measured in donor livers' cold storage flush solution is a valid biomarker to predict post-transplant outcomes. Liver grafts with high FMN levels may benefit from machine perfusion to improve outcomes.

Promising Results of Kidney Transplantation From Donors Following Euthanasia During 10-Year Follow-Up: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

The outcome of kidneys transplanted following organ donation after euthanasia (ODE) remains unclear. This study analyzed all kidney transplantations in the Netherlands from January 2012 to December 2021, comparing the outcomes following ODE, donation after circulatory death (DCD-III), and donation after brain death (DBD). 9,208 kidney transplantations were performed: 148 ODE, 2118 DCD-III, and 1845 DBD. Initial graft function was compared between these categories. Immediate graft function, delayed graft function and primary non-function in ODE kidney recipients were 76%, 22%, and 2%, respectively, 47%, 50% and 3% in DCD-III kidney recipients and 73%, 25%, and 2% in DBD kidney recipients (overall p-value: p < 0.001). The number of kidneys transplanted over a median follow-up period of 4.0 years (IQR 2.0-6.6), was 1810, including 72 ODE, 958 DCD-III and 780 DBD kidneys. In this period, 213 grafts (11.8%) failed [7 grafts (9.7%) from ODE donors, 93 grafts (9.7%) from DCD-III donors, and 113 grafts (14.5%) from DBD donors]. Kidneys transplanted after euthanasia have a good immediate graft function, a comparable longitudinal 10years eGFR, and similar graft failure hazard to kidneys from DCD-III and DBD. Kidney transplantation following ODE is a valuable and safe contribution to the donor pool.

Outcomes of Multiorgan Heart Transplant Between Donation After Circulatory Death and Brain Death.

There is insufficient data on the outcomes of donation after circulatory death (DCD) multiorgan transplant that includes heart. The primary objective of this study is to compare the overall survival outcomes of DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) multiorgan transplants. We identified all heart transplant patients from 2019 to June of 2023 using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Database who also received an additional organ (kidney, liver, and lungs). A total of 1,844 DBD and 91 DCD multiorgan transplants occurred within the study period, the majority being combined heart-kidney transplantation. More patients were listed at a higher status in the DBD group (p < 0.05) and were in the intensive care unit (ICU) before transplant (p < 0.05). Despite the higher ischemia time in the DCD group (p < 0.05), the overall unmatched survival did not differ between the two groups (p < 0.05). Within the heart-kidney transplants, the overall survival between DBD and DCD heart-kidney transplants did not differ in either unmatched or matched groups (unmatched p = 0.5, matched p = 0.5). In conclusion, the data on the outcomes of DCD multiorgan transplants are limited. Still, our analysis of the currently available data suggests that the overall survival is comparable in the DCD multiorgan transplants.

A Global Experience of Donation after Circulatory Death for Pediatric Lung Transplantation.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) lung transplantation has increased, but there is limited data in children. We sought to characterize the international experience of pediatric DCD lung transplant (LT) in comparison to donation after brain death (DBD) to address extreme donor organ shortages in children needing LT. Using the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry, 1453 children (<18yo) LT recipients from January 2004 to June 2018 were identified: 34 (3%) were DCD and 1419 (97%) were DBD recipients. Post-transplant outcomes were compared between groups. Propensity score method was used to derive matched cohorts and were compared between groups. DCD and DBD recipients were of similar age, with cystic fibrosis being the most frequent indication for LT in both groups (64.5% vs. 57.5%, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated similar survival between DCD and DBD cohorts, whereas propensity score-matched recipients also identified similar post-transplant survival in both groups (P=0.098). Secondary analysis found that DCD LT recipients had a longer post-transplant length of hospital stay (unmatched cohorts: 36.5d vs. 20d, p=0.022; matched cohort: 26d vs. 19d, p=0.016), and shorter time to acute cellular rejection (ACR) (unmatched cohorts: 248d vs. 560d, p=0.039; matched cohorts: 248d vs. 1650d,p=0.059). Due to DCD being a key contributor to the increasing number of lung transplants being performed worldwide, the results of this analysis support this organ donation approach in children requiring LT, which would increase access to donor organs. The identification of a potential shorter time to ACR needs further exploration as more DCD pediatric LTs are performed.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ameliorate hepatic injury in brain death rat donors with hemodynamic instability.

Donation after brain death (DBD) serves as the primary source for liver transplantation. However, livers obtained through DBD often incur damage due to unstable hemodynamics, potentially impacting transplantation outcomes. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) emerges as an optimal technique for donor liver retrieval and has found application in clinical settings. Despite its clinical implementation, the precise mechanisms through which ECMO enhances liver functions remain elusive. This study aims to investigate the mechanisms underlying how ECMO ameliorates liver function in brain-dead donors. We randomly assigned 18 male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (350 ± 50 g) into three groups: Con (n = 6), DBD-assisted drug (n = 6), and DBD-assisted ECMO (n = 6). After 3 h of ECMO, the rats were sacrificed. We assessed and compared changes in heart rate, blood pressure, cumulative liver damage (evaluated through HE and TUNEL staining), serum levels of AST and ALT, alterations in serum oxidative stress factors (MDA, H2O2, SOD, and 8-OHdG), and serum concentrations of related inflammatory factors (interleukin [IL]-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) among rats in the Con, DBD-assisted drug, and DBD-assisted ECMO groups. Subsequently, we established a rat orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) model and transplanted livers obtained through the aforementioned methods. The post-transplantation status of the livers was observed. After 3 h of brain death, liver injury worsened, accompanied by a significant increase in serum transaminases, inflammatory responses, oxidative stress, and TUNEL staining. Strikingly, ECMO not only stabilized hemodynamics after DBD but also mitigated liver damage, leading to an alleviated status post liver transplantation. ECMO stabilizes hemodynamics, attenuates inflammatory responses and oxidative stress, thereby enhancing the quality of liver grafts for transplantation.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 activation attenuates inflammation and oxidative stress in brain death donor followed by rat lung transplantation

Brain death (BD) provides most of the donor organs destined for lung transplantation (LTx). However, the organs may be affected by inflammatory and oxidative processes. Based on this, we hypothesize that the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) activation can reduce the lung injury associated with LTx. 3 h after BD induction, rats were injected with saline (BD group) or an ACE2 activator (ACE2a group; 15 mg/kg-1) and kept on mechanical ventilation for additional 3 h. A third group included a control ventilation (Control group) prior to transplant. After BD protocol, left LTx were performed, followed by 2 h-reperfusion. ACE2 activation was associated with better oxygenation after BD management (p = 0.01), attenuating edema (p = 0.05) followed by the reduction in tissue resistance (p = 0.01) and increase of respiratory compliance (p = 0.02). Nrf2 expression was also upregulated in the ACE2a group (p = 0.03). After transplantation, ACE2a group showed lower levels of TNF-α (p = 0.02), IL-6 (p = 0.001), IL-1β (p = 0.01), ROS (p = 0.004) and MDA (p = 0.002), in addition to higher CAT activity (p = 0.04). In conclusion, our study suggests that ACE2 activation improves anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity in a model of LTx.

Early Renal Outcomes Following Heart Transplantation Using Organs Procured After Circulatory Death.

Transplantation using hearts obtained through donation after circulatory death (DCD) is increasing, but data on recipient renal outcomes are limited. Patients at a single institution who underwent heart transplantation using organs procured through DCD or donation after brain death (DBD) from April 2016 to August 2022 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Hemodynamic measures were collected via right heart catheterization performed 1 week after transplantation. Posttransplantation renal outcomes included estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 16 weeks, and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal replacement therapy within 1 week. The analysis included 225 patients (55 recipients of DCD). Baseline characteristics were comparable between recipients of DCD and DBD. Renal outcomes within 1 week posttransplantation in recipients of DCD were similar to recipients of DBD, including percent change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (-37.9% [-58.6 to -6.2] versus -31.9% [-52.4 to -9.9]; P=0.91), incidence of AKI (47.3% versus 46.5%; P>0.99) and incidence of renal replacement therapy (3.6% versus 4.7%; P>0.99). Recipients of DCD with AKI within 1 week ("early AKI") did not recover to baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (75.8 [60.2-91.3] mL/min per 1.73 m2) by week 16 (59.3 [46.9-73.6] mL/min per 1.73 m2; P=0.002), whereas recipients without early AKI exhibited comparable estimated glomerular filtration rate to baseline by week 4 (84.5 [70.8-98.5] mL/min per 1.73 m2; P=0.084). Similar trends were observed in recipients of DBD. Recipients of DCD demonstrated similar renal outcomes compared with recipients of DBD, supporting the ongoing use of DCD transplantation. Early AKI was associated with persistent renal dysfunction for recipients of both DCD and DBD.

Outcomes of donation after circulatory death (DCD) and ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) lung transplantation

BackgroundDonation after circulatory death (DCD) and ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) have been adopted to expand the donor pool in lung transplantation, but outcomes data have been conflicting. This study explores mid-term outcomes of DCD lung transplantation in the modern era, with a focus on EVLP and risk factors for graft failure. MethodsThe United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for adult lung transplants from 1/1/2015 to 3/1/2023. Loss to follow-up, multiorgan and prior lung transplants were excluded. DCD vs DBD (donation after brain death) lung transplants were compared, with subgroup analysis +/- EVLP. Outcomes were survival and postoperative complications. Overall survival was analyzed separately for an early era (2015-2018) and modern era (2019-2023). ResultsThe study included 1103 DCD (221 with EVLP, and 882 without) and 17973 donation after brain death (DBD) lung transplants (524 with EVLP, and 17449 without). Median follow-up was 3 years. DCD donors were less likely to be CDC high risk (19.3% vs 24.1%, p<0.001), have purulence on bronchoscopy (13.3% vs 18.3%, p<0.001) or infiltrates on chest x-ray (66.7% vs 67.8%, p=0.013). EVLP was more likely to be used for DCD transplants (20.0% vs 2.9%, p<0.001).After transplant, DCD recipients were more likely to be reintubated (24.3% vs 18.5%, p<0.001) and require ECMO within 72 hours (14.9% vs 7.8%, p<0.001), and DCD donation was an independent risk factor for these complications on multivariable logistic regression. Overall survival did not differ significantly between DCD and DBD transplants on adjusted survival analysis in the early or modern era (p=0.774 and p=0.468 respectively). On multivariable Cox regression, DCD and EVLP were not independent risk factors for mortality.On subgroup analysis, the DCD+EVLP cohort had significantly worse survival in the modern era, which remained significant after adjusting for donor and recipient factors (p=0.005). EVLP was an independent risk factor for graft failure in the DCD cohort (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.00-1.77, p=0.047), but did not significantly affect DBD graft survival (p=0.870). Risk factors for graft failure and mortality in the DCD+EVLP cohort included pulmonary hypertension (HR 77.5, 95% CI 6.15-979, p<0.001), transfusion prior to transplant (HR 2.60, 95% CI 1.07-6.31, p=0.035), elevated creatinine (HR 2.82, 95% CI 1.34-5.90, p=0.006), and higher allocation score (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, p=0.017) ConclusionStudy findings suggest increased risks of mortality and perioperative complications following transplantation with DCD lungs that have undergone EVLP. DCD lung transplantation without EVLP confers equivalent survival but with some increase in perioperative complications. Further investigation and careful recipient selection is warranted to optimize the use of these extended criteria donors in the modern era.

Abdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion after Donation after Circulatory Death Improves Pancreatic Islet Isolation Yield

Abdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion (aNRP) is an in-situ normothermic oxygenated donor perfusion technique before procurement during controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) procedures and allows for organ quality evaluation. There are few data on the effect of aNRP on pancreatic islet isolation and subsequent transplantation outcomes. We aim to evaluate the impact of aNRP on cDCD pancreatic islet isolation and transplantation.A retrospective analysis was performed on pancreatic islet isolation outcomes from aNRP, cDCD, and Donation after Brain death (DBD) pancreases. Isolations were compared to previous donor age (60-75) matched isolations. Islet function was asses by a dynamic Glucose Stimulated Insulin Secretion (dGSIS).Donor baseline characteristics did not differ among groups. Isolations from aNRP pancreases (471,739 IEQ [655,435 – 244,851]) yielded more islets compared to cDCD (218,750 IEQ [375,951 – 112,364, p<0.01) and to DBD (206,522 IEQ [385,544 – 142,446, p=0.03) pancreases. dGSIS tests in seven aNRP islet preparations showed a mean stimulation index of 4.91, indicating good functionality. Bilirubin and alanine aminotransferase during aNRP correlated with islet yield (r2=0.685, p=0.002; r2=0.491, p=0.016 respectively).Islet isolation after aNRP in cDCD donors results in a high islet yield with viable functional islets. aNRP could increase the utilization of pancreases for islet transplantation.

Delayed Graft Function Equally Worsens Early Outcomes in Kidney Recipients from Donation after Circulatory Death vs. Brain Death Donors

Delayed Graft Function Equally Worsens Early Outcomes in Kidney Recipients from Donation after Circulatory Death vs. Brain Death Donors

Post-transplant renal anemia: a call to action from a national study in routine clinical practice.

Post-transplant anemia is a prevalent yet often overlooked condition that poses significant risks. Current guidelines consider the same treatment recommendations and goals for these patients as for chronic kidney disease patients not on dialysis. Previous reports demonstrated a lack of awareness and suboptimal management, indicating a pressing need for improvement. We therefore wanted to update the information on post-transplant anemia. We aimed to describe the present state of anemia management, goals and adherence to guidelines within a representative sample of the kidney transplant (KTx) population. We designed a retrospective nationwide multicenter study including outpatients from eight KTx hospitals. Nephrologists gathered data from electronic medical records encompassing demographics, comorbidities, KTx characteristics and immunosuppressive therapy, and information pertaining to anemia management (laboratory values, previously prescribed treatments and subsequent adjustments). The European statement on the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines was the reference for definitions, drug prescriptions and targets. Anemia occurring within the initial 6 months post-transplantation was classified as early onset. We included 297 patients with post-transplant anemia aged 62.8 years (standard deviation 13.6), 60% of whom were male. They had received a graft from cardiac death or brain death donors (61.6% and 31.1%, respectively) a median of 2.5 years (0.5-8.7) before. Among them 77% (n=228) were classified as having late post-transplant anemia, characterized by a higher prevalence of microcytic and iron deficiency anemia. A total of 158 patients were on erythropoietic-stimulating agents (ESAs) treatment, yet surprisingly 110 of them lacked iron supplementation. Notably, 44 patients had an indication for iron supplementation and among them, 30 exhibited absolute iron deficiency. Out of the 158 patients receiving ESAs, only 39 surpassed the limit for the ESA resistance index, indicating poor response. This resistance was more frequent among patients with early post-transplant anemia (26.1% vs 9.2%). We have identified iron profile, early post-transplant anemia and estimated glomerular filtration rate as factors associated with the highest risk of resistance. We found that hemoglobin targets are individualized upwards in post-transplant anemia. In this setting, iron therapy continues to be underutilized, especially intravenous, and iron deficiency and prior events (blood transfusion or hospital admission) explain most of the hyporesponsiveness to ESA. This highlights missed opportunities for precise prescription targeting and adherence to established guidelines, suggesting a need for improved management strategies in post-transplant anemia patients.

Enhanced Artificial Intelligence Methods for Liver Steatosis Assessment Using Machine Learning and Color Image Processing: Liver Color Project.

The use of livers with significant steatosis is associated with worse transplantation outcomes. Brain death donor liver acceptance is mostly based on subjective surgeon assessment of liver appearance, since steatotic livers acquire a yellowish tone. The aim of this study was to develop a rapid, robust, accurate, and cost-effective method to assess liver steatosis. From June 1, 2018, to November 30, 2023, photographs and tru-cut needle biopsies were taken from adult brain death donor livers at a single university hospital for the study. All the liver photographs were taken by smartphones then color calibrated, segmented, and divided into patches. Color and texture features were then extracted and used as input, and the machine learning method was applied. This is a collaborative project between Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Barcelona MedTech, Pompeu Fabra University, and is referred to as LiverColor. A total of 192 livers (362 photographs and 7240 patches) were included. When setting a macrosteatosis threshold of 30%, the best results were obtained using the random forest classifier, achieving an AUROC = 0.74, with 85% accuracy. Machine learning coupled with liver texture and color analysis of photographs taken with smartphones provides excellent accuracy for determining liver steatosis.

Kidney Transplant Outcome Following Donation After Euthanasia.

In the Netherlands, organ donation after euthanasia (donation after circulatory death type V [DCD-V]) has been increasingly performed since 2012. However, the outcomes of DCD-V kidney grafts have not been thoroughly investigated. It is critical to assess the outcomes of these kidney grafts to ascertain whether DCD-V is a safe and valuable way to increase the kidney donor pool. To investigate the outcomes of DCD-V kidney transplantation and compare them with outcomes of kidney transplantation after circulatory death after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (DCD type III [DCD-III]) and donation after brain death (DBD). A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the database from the Dutch Transplant Foundation. All kidney transplants in the Netherlands between January 2012 (start of the euthanasia program) and July 2023 were included. Follow-up was obtained through 5 years after transplantation. Data analysis was performed from November 2023 until February 2024. Kidney transplantation with a DCD-V graft compared with DCD-III and DBD grafts. The primary outcome was death-censored graft survival until 5 years after transplantation. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), permanent nonfunction (PNF), serum creatinine concentration, and patient survival until 5 years after kidney transplantation. A total of 145 DCD-V kidney transplants were compared with 1936 DCD-III and 1255 DBD kidney transplants. Median (IQR) recipient age was 59 (46-66) years in the DCD-V cohort, compared with 61 (50-68) years in the DCD-III cohort and 61 (50-68) years in the DBD cohort. The incidence of DGF with DCD-V kidney transplants (26%) was significantly less than that with DCD-III kidney transplants (49%; P < .001) and similar to that with DBD kidney transplants (22%; P = .46). PNF occurrence with DCD-V kidneys (6%) was similar to that with DCD-III kidneys (6%; P = .79) and higher than in DBD kidneys (4%; P < .001). There was no difference in 5-year death-censored graft survival between DCD-V grafts (82%) and DCD-III (86%; P = .99) or DBD (84%; P = .99) grafts. There was no difference in 5-year patient survival between DCD-V kidney transplants (69%) and DCD-III (76%; P = .45) or DBD (73%; P = .74) kidney transplants. A propensity score analysis was performed to match the DCD-V and DCD-III cohort, showing results similar to those of the unmatched cohort. This study found that DCD-V kidney transplantation yielded a lower incidence of DGF compared with DCD-III kidney transplantation and yielded long-term results similar to those of DCD-III and DBD kidney transplantation. The findings suggest that DCD-V is a safe and valuable way to increase the kidney donor pool.

The differential impact of early graft dysfunction in kidney donation after brain death and after circulatory death: Insights from the Dutch National Transplant Registry

Kidneys donated after circulatory death (DCD) perform similarly to kidneys donated after brain death (DBD). However, the respective incidences of delayed graft function (DGF) differ. This questions the donor type-specific impact of early graft function on long-term outcomes. Using competing risk and Cox-regression analysis, we compared death-censored graft loss between types of early graft function: DGF (temporary dialysis dependency started within 7 days after transplantation), slow graft function (3-day plasma creatinine decline less than 10% per day), and immediate graft function. In 1061 DBD and 1605 DCD graft recipients (January 2014 until January 2023), graft survival was similar. DGF was associated with death-censored graft loss in DBD and DCD (adjusted hazard ratios: DGF in DBD: 1.79 [1.04-2.91], P = .027, DGF in DCD: 1.84 [1.18-2.87], P = .008; Reference: no DGF). Slow graft function was associated with death-censored graft loss in DBD, but not significantly in DCD (adjusted hazard ratios DBD: 2.82 (1.34-5.93), P = .007, and DCD: 1.54 (0.72-3.35), P = .262; Reference: immediate graft function). Early graft dysfunction has a differential impact on graft outcome in DBD and DCD. The differences between DBD and DCD should be accounted for in research and the clinic.

Transplantation Outcomes in Hepatitis C Virus-Positive Donor Hearts After Circulatory Death

Although the use of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive hearts has been shown to be safe and effective among donors with donation after brain death (DBD), it remains unknown whether such organs recovered after circulatory death (DCD) have similar outcomes. In contradistinction to recovery from DBD using cold static organ storage, DCD procurement processes typically use normothermic-perfusion transport strategies that necessitate the use of a large volume of donor blood and involve exposure to temperatures oscillating between cold to dominantly normothermic conditions. We performed a retrospective analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry data in the United States and found that clinical outcomes do not differ with respect to rates of treated allograft rejection, early and 1-year survival. Ideally, the organ-recovery source should not result in a bias in organ-offer acceptance from HCV-positive donors, although long-term outcome data are yet unavailable.

P.088: Basic study of brain death donor organ transplant.

P.088: Basic study of brain death donor organ transplant.

Retrospective Evaluation of Patients Diagnosed with Brain Death in the Intensive Care Unit: A 10-year Single Center Analysis

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the demographic characteristics, clinical features, timing of the diagnosis of brain death, and factors associated with organ donation in patients diagnosed as brain dead in the intensive care unit in the last decade. Method: Between 01.01.2015-01.06.2024, the age, gender, intensive care unit hospitalization diagnoses, the day of intensive care unit hospitalization, blood groups, the number of patients diagnosed with brain death by years, the number of patients diagnosed with brain death, the number of patients who became donors, laboratory values on the day of intensive care unit hospitalization and the day of brain death diagnosis, the reasons why families did not accept organ donation were recorded from the patients' files and hospital information system. Results: A total of 59 patients were included in the study. Of the patients, 32 (54.24%) were female and 27 (45.76%) were male. The age distribution of the patients was seven (11.86%) aged 0-17 years, 29 (49.15%) aged 18-64 years, and 23 (38.98%) aged 65 years and older. The most common intensive care unit hospitalization diagnoses were intracerebral hemorrhage (35.59%), subarachnoid hemorrhage (16.95%), and CVA (13.56%). Although brain death was diagnosed in 83.05% of the patients in the first seven days, it was diagnosed in an average of 4.81 days in all patients. When the laboratory values between the day of admission to the intensive care unit and the day of brain death were diagnosed, a statistically significant difference was found in Na+, Cl-, K+, AST, BUN, and creatinine values (p0.05). Among the reasons for not accepting organ donation, familial reasons were the highest, with 79.66%. Conclusion: In order to increase the number of organ donations, it is important to raise public awareness and increase the level of knowledge of families about organ donation. Patients with poor neurological prognosis with hospitalization diagnoses such as intracranial hemorrhage, CVA, and Post CPR should be closely monitored for brain death and potential donors.

Expanding Horizons in Cardiac Transplant: Efficacy and Outcomes of Circulatory and Brain Death Donor Hearts in a Newly Implemented Cardiac Transplant Program with Limited Donor Accessibility and a Literature Review.

(1) Background: Cardiac donation after circulatory death (DCD) is an emerging paradigm in organ transplantation. However, this technique is recent and has only been implemented by highly experienced centers. This study compares the characteristics and outcomes of thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TANRP) and static cold-storage DCD and traditional donation after brain death (DBD) cardiac transplants (CT) in a newly stablished transplant program with restricted donor availability. (2) Method: We performed a retrospective, single-center study of all adult patients who underwent a CT between November 2019 and December 2023, with a follow-up conducted until August 2024. Data were retrieved from medical records. A review of the current literature on DCD CT was conducted to provide a broader context for our findings. The primary outcome was survival at 6 months after transplantation. (3) Results: During the study period, 76 adults (median age 56 years [IQR: 50-63 years]) underwent CT, and 12 (16%) were DCD donors. DCD donors had a similar age (46 vs. 47 years, p = 0.727), were mostly male (92%), and one patient had left ventricular dysfunction during the intraoperative DCD process. There were no significant differences in recipients' characteristics. Survival was similar in the DCD group compared to DBD at 6 months (100 vs. 94%) and 12 months post-CT survival (92% vs. 94%), p = 0.82. There was no primary graft dysfunction in the DCD group (9% in DBD, p = 0.581). The median total hospital stay was longer in the DCD group (46 vs. 21 days, p = 0.021). An increase of 150% in transplantation activity due to DCD was estimated. (4) Conclusions: In a new CT program that utilized older donors and included recipients with similar illnesses and comorbidities, comparable outcomes between DCD and DBD hearts were observed. DCD was rapidly incorporated into the transplant activity, demonstrating an expedited learning curve and significantly increasing the availability of donor hearts.

Benefits of Living Over Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in Elderly Recipients. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of a Large European Registry Cohort.

Although kidney transplantation from living donors (LD) offers better long-term results than from deceased donors (DD), elderly recipients are less likely to receive LD transplants than younger ones. We analyzed renal transplant outcomes from LD versus DD in elderly recipients with a propensity-matched score. This retrospective, observational study included the first single kidney transplants in recipients aged ≥65years from two European registry cohorts (2013-2020, n = 4,257). Recipients of LD (n = 408), brain death donors (BDD, n = 3,072), and controlled cardiocirculatory death donors (cDCD, n = 777) were matched for donor and recipient age, sex, dialysis time and recipient diabetes. Major graft and patient outcomes were investigated. Unmatched analyses showed that LD recipients were more likely to be transplanted preemptively and had shorter dialysis times than any DD type. The propensity score matched Cox's regression analysis between LD and BDD (387-pairs) and LD and cDCD (259-pairs) revealing a higher hazard ratio for graft failure with BDD (2.19 [95% CI: 1.16-4.15], p = 0.016) and cDCD (3.38 [95% CI: 1.79-6.39], p < 0.001). One-year eGFR was higher in LD transplants than in BDD and cDCD recipients. In elderly recipients, LD transplantation offers superior graft survival and renal function compared to BDD or cDCD. This strategy should be further promoted to improve transplant outcomes.

Impact of Warm Ischemia Time on Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplant Outcomes.

Efforts to address the shortage of donor organs include increasing the use of renal allografts from donors after circulatory death (DCD). While warm ischemia time (WIT) is thought to be an important factor in DCD kidney evaluation, few studies have compared the relationship between WIT and DCD kidney outcomes, and WIT acceptance practices remain variable. We conducted a single-center retrospective review of all adult patients who underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation from 2000 to 2021. We evaluated the impact of varied functional warm ischemia time (fWIT) in controlled DCD donors by comparing donor and recipient characteristics and posttransplant outcomes between high fWIT (>60min), low fWIT (≤60min), and kidneys transplanted from donors after brain death (DBD). Two thousand eight hundred eleven patients were identified, 638 received low fWIT DCD, 93 received high fWIT DCD, and 2080 received DBD kidneys. There was no significant difference in 5-year graft survival between the DCD low fWIT, high fWIT, and DBD groups, with 84%, 83%, and 83% of grafts functioning, respectively. Five-year patient survival was 91% in the low fWIT group, 92% in the high fWIT group, and 90% in the DBD group. An increase in kidney donor risk index (KDRI) (HR 3.37, 95% CI=2.1-5.7) and high CIT compared to low CIT (HR 2.12, 95% CI=1.4-3.1) have higher hazard ratios for 1-year graft failure. Increased acceptance of kidneys from selected DCD donors with prolonged fWIT may present an opportunity to increase kidney utilization while preserving outcomes. Our group specifically prioritizes the use of kidneys from younger donors, with lower KDPI, and without acute kidney injury, or risk factors for underlying chronic kidney disease.