Brain Angiotensin Research Articles

Angiotensin II in the brain and the autonomic control of the kidney

The kidney plays a central role in ensuring cardiovascular homeostasis, in that it functions to ensure that the variation in fluid intake is matched to that lost through normal everyday metabolism. The autonomic nervous system, via the renal sympathetic nerves, allows kidney function to be adjusted dynamically in response to changes in sensory information arising from the cardiovascular system, the soma, viscera and the higher cortical centres. At the level of the kidney, the sympathetic nerves innervate the vascular and tubular components, thereby regulating renal haemodynamics and fluid reabsorption. The processing of sensory information by the central nervous system involves nuclei associated with cardiovascular control and it is these nuclei which are influenced by angiotensin II generated locally in the brain. The angiotensin II appears to act in a neuromodulatory fashion or as a neurotransmitter. There is now sound evidence that the baroreflex control of sympathetic outflow to the kidney, at least, is under tonic inhibitory control by brain angiotensin II, which also facilitates the impact of the somatosensory system in mediating sympatho-excitation. The significance of brain angiotensin II in mediating reflex activation of the sympathetic nerves from other sensory systems has not yet been defined and needs to be resolved. Interestingly, it may be that deficits in the production of brain angiotensin II at these nuclei could contribute in part to the genesis of hypertension.

Angiotensin II Attenuates Synaptic GABA Release and Excites Paraventricular-Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Output Neurons

The hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) neurons regulate sympathetic outflow through projections to the spinal cord and rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM). Although the PVN-RVLM pathway is important for the action of brain angiotensin II (Ang II) on autonomic control, the cellular mechanisms involved are not fully known. In this study, we examined the effect of Ang II on the excitability and synaptic inputs to RVLM-projecting PVN neurons. PVN neurons were retrogradely labeled by FluoSpheres injected into the RVLM of rats. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were performed on labeled PVN neurons in brain slices. Ang II significantly increased the firing rate of PVN neurons from 3.63 +/- 0.65 to 6.10 +/- 0.75 Hz (P < 0.05, n = 9), and such an effect was eliminated by an AT(1) receptor antagonist, losartan. Furthermore, inclusion of a G protein inhibitor, guanosine 5'-O-(2-thiodiphosphate, in the pipette internal solution did not alter the excitatory effect of Ang II on labeled PVN neurons. Application of 0.5 to 5 microM Ang II significantly decreased the amplitude of evoked GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in a dose-dependent manner. Also, 2 microM Ang II significantly decreased the frequency of miniature IPSCs (mIPSCs) from 3.89 +/- 0.84 to 2.06 +/- 0.45 Hz (P < 0.05, n = 11), but did not change the amplitude and decay time constant of mIPSCs. By contrast, Ang II had no significant effect on glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic currents at the concentrations that inhibited IPSCs. In addition, Ang II failed to excite PVN neurons in the presence of bicuculline. Collectively, this study provides important new information that Ang II excites RVLM-projecting PVN neurons through attenuation of GABAergic synaptic inputs.

Anti-stress and anti-anxiety effects of centrally acting angiotensin II AT 1 receptor antagonists

The brain and the peripheral (hormonal) angiotensin II systems are stimulated during stress. Activation of brain angiotensin II AT 1 receptors is required for the stress-induced hormone secretion, including CRH, ACTH, corticoids and vasopressin, and for stimulation of the central sympathetic activity. Long-term peripheral administration of the angiotensin II AT 1 antagonist candesartan blocks not only peripheral but also brain AT 1 receptors, prevents the hormonal and sympathoadrenal response to isolation stress and prevents the formation of stress-induced gastric ulcers. The mechanisms responsible for the prevention of stress-induced ulcers by the AT 1 receptor antagonist include protection from the stress-induced ischemia and inflammation (neutrophil infiltration and increase in ICAM-1 and TNF-α) in the gastric mucosa and a partial blockade of the stress-induced sympathoadrenal stimulation, while the protective effect of the glucocorticoid release during stress is maintained. AT 1 receptor antagonism prevents the stress-induced decrease in cortical CRH 1 and benzodiazepine binding and is anxiolytic. Blockade of brain angiotensin II AT 1 receptors offers a novel therapeutic opportunity for the treatment of anxiety and other stress-related disorders.

Angiotensin III as Well as Angiotensin II Regulates Water Flow through Aquaporins in a Clam Worm

Angiotensin III has been reported to exist in various animals and tissues. The physiological role, however, is still unclear except that brain angiotensin III is a central regulator of vasopressin release. In this study, angiotensin III as well as angiotensin II enhanced an increase in body weight of clam worms of Perinereis sp. under a hypo-osmotic condition and suppressed a decrease in body weight under a hyper-osmotic condition. When clam worms were treated with tetrachloroaurate (III) after angiotensin-treatment, these enhancing and suppressive effects of the angiotensins under hypo- and hyper-osmotic conditions were inhibited. In contrast, when clam worms were pretreated with tetrachloroaurate (III) before angiotensin-treatment, these effects of angiotensins were not inhibited. Since tetrachloroaurate (III) is a representative blocker of aquaporins, these results indicate that angiotensin III as well as angiotensin II regulates water flow through aquaporins in clam worms.

Angiotensin type 1 receptor blockage improves ischemic injury following transient focal cerebral ischemia

Following cerebral ischemia, i.v. infusion of angiotensin II increases cerebral edema and mortality. Angiotensin type 1 receptor blockage should therefore improve acute cerebral ischemia. Left middle cerebral artery occlusion (120 min) followed by reperfusion was performed with the thread method under halothane anesthesia in Sprague-Dawley rats. Olmesartan (angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker; 0.01 or 0.1μmol/kg/h) was infused i.p. for 7 days following middle cerebral artery occlusion followed by reperfusion. Stroke index score, infarct volume, specific gravity, and brain angiotensin II and matrix metalloproteinases were quantified in the ischemic and non-ischemic hemispheres. Olmesartan treatment improved stroke index score, infarct volume, and cerebral edema in our cerebral ischemia model. In particular, stroke index score, infarct volume, and cerebral edema were reduced even with a low dose of olmesartan that did not decrease blood pressure. Paralleling these effects on cerebral ischemia, olmesartan treatment also reduced the reactive upregulation in brain angiotensin II, matrix metalloproteinase-2, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase in the ischemic area. Angiotensin type 1 receptor stimulation may be one of the important factors that cause cerebral edema following cerebral ischemia, and that its inhibition may be of therapeutic advantage in cerebral ischemia.

Influence of brain angiotensin on thermoregulation and hydromineral balance during pregnancy in rats

During mammalian pregnancy, body temperature decreases and there are changes in fluid and electrolyte balance. Angiotensin signaling mechanisms in the brain have been shown to influence thermoregulation and body fluid balance in the nonpregnant state. We hypothesized that brain angiotensin is also implicated in adjusting these physiological systems in the pregnant rat. We compared core temperature and fluid regulation in three groups of pregnant rats: untreated rats, rats receiving continuous infusion of an AT(1) antagonist candesartan (5 microg.kg(-1).day(-1)) into a lateral cerebral ventricle to block brain AT(1) receptors, and rats receiving vehicle [artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF)] vehicle. Untreated and aCSF-treated rats showed a decrease in colonic temperature (-0.5 and -0.8 degrees C respectively) by day 20 of gestation. However, rats treated with candesartan had increased colonic temperature compared with baseline (+0.9 degrees C), and their temperature was significantly higher on days 7 (P < 0.05), 17 (P < 0.05), and 20 (P < 0.001) compared with the other groups (aCSF and untreated). Daily food and water intakes and body weight were not different between the three groups. Similarly, litter sizes and pup weights were equal in all groups. Finally, the expected decreases in plasma Na(+) and osmolality during pregnancy were equivalent in all groups. This study suggests that brain angiotensin mediates the progressive decrease in body temperature that occurs during pregnancy. However, the changes in fluid balance associated with pregnancy are not dependent on brain angiotensin.

Oral administration of an AT 1 receptor antagonist prevents the central effects of angiotensin II in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Peripheral and brain angiotensin II AT 1 receptor blockade decreases high blood pressure, stress, and neuronal injury. To clarify the effects of long-term brain Ang II receptor blockade, the AT 1 blocker, candesartan, was orally administered to spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) for 40 days, followed by intraventricular injection of 25 ng of Ang II. Before Ang II injection, AT 1 receptor blockade normalized blood pressure and decreased plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and corticosterone. After central administration of excess Ang II, the reduction of ACTH and corticosterone release induced by AT 1 receptor blockade no longer occurred. Central Ang II administration to vehicle-treated SHRs further increased blood pressure, provoked drinking, increased tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) mRNA expression in the locus coeruleus, and stimulated sympathoadrenal catecholamine release. Pretreatment with the AT 1 receptor antagonist eliminated Ang II-induced increases in blood pressure, water intake, and sympathoadrenal catecholamine release; inhibited peripheral and brain AT 1 receptors; increased AT 2 receptor binding in the locus coeruleus, inferior olive, and adrenal cortex; and decreased AT 2 receptor binding in the adrenal medulla. Inhibition of brain AT 1 receptors correlated with decreased TH transcription in the locus coeruleus, indicating a decreased central sympathetic drive. This, and the diminished adrenomedullary AT 1 and AT 2 receptor stimulation, result in decreased sympathoadrenomedullary stimulation. Oral administration of AT 1 antagonists can effectively block central actions of Ang II, regulating blood pressure and reaction to stress, and selectively and differentially modulating sympathoadrenal response and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal stimulation produced by brain Ang II—effects of potential therapeutic importance.

Effect of chronic stress on the cardiac baroreflex in the post-weanling rat

There is increasing evidence that early life stressors may program blood pressure control mechanisms such that the risk for cardiovascular disease in later life is increased. In the present investigation, the effect of repeated restraint/heat stress during the two-week period immediately after weaning on baroreflex function was determined and the contribution of brain angiotensin II (ANG II) to the changes was assessed in young, conscious, freely moving Sprague Dawley rats. In rats two weeks post weaning, basal MAP was significantly higher and basal HR significantly lower than rats tested immediately after weaning. This change in the operating point of HR was not accompanied by any changes in baroreflex function. Treatment with chronic icv infusion of losartan, an AT1 receptor antagonist, during the two-week period prevented the changes in basal MAP and HR. Chronic stress during the two weeks post weaning, whether due to surgical implantation of icv cannulae or due to restraint/heat stress, significantly shifted the set-point of the baroreflex function to a higher pressure. Chronic icv infusion of losartan during the period prevented these effects (at least in the case of stress due to the presence of icv cannulae) suggesting a role for brain ANG II in the change. Changes in the expression of CRH mRNA in the paraventricular nucleus could not explain the stress-related change in baroreflex function. If the rightward shift in the baroreflex persists into adulthood, it could increase the susceptibility to cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension.

Brain angiotensin II, an important stress hormone: regulatory sites and therapeutic opportunities.

The presence of a brain Angiotensin II (Ang II) system, separated from and physiologically integrated with the peripheral, circulating renin-angiotensin system, is firmly established. Ang II is made in the brain and activates specific brain AT(1) receptors to regulate thirst and fluid metabolism. Some AT(1) receptors are located outside the blood-brain barrier and are sensitive to brain and circulating Ang II. Other AT(1) receptors, located inside the blood-brain barrier, respond to stimulation by Ang II of brain origin. AT(1) receptors in the subfornical organ, the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN), and the median eminence are involved in the regulation of the stress response. In particular, AT(1) receptors in the PVN are under glucocorticoid control and regulate corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) formation and release. In the PVN, restraint elicits a fast increase in AT(1) receptor mRNA expression. The expression of paraventricular AT(1) receptors is increased during repeated restraint and after 24 h of isolation stress, and their stimulation is essential for the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation, the hallmark of the stress response. Peripheral administration of an AT(1) receptor antagonist blocks peripheral and brain AT(1) receptors, prevents the sympathoadrenal and hormonal response to isolation stress, and prevents the gastric stress ulcers that are a characteristic consequence of cold-restraint stress. This evidence indicates that pharmacologic inhibition of the peripheral and brain Ang II system by AT(1) receptor blockade has a place in the prevention and treatment of stress-related disorders.

Angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockade decreases brain artery inflammation in a stress-prone rat strain.

The spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) are a genetically hypertensive strain with vulnerability to brain ischemia and stress. In SHR, the brain Angiotensin II (Ang II) system is chronically stimulated, resulting in brain artery remodeling and inflammation. Pretreatment with Ang II AT(1) receptor antagonists protects from brain ischemia and prevents the hormonal and sympathoadrenal response to stress. In addition, the anti-inflammatory effects of AT(1) receptor antagonists are partially responsible for preventing the development of stress-induced gastric ulcers. We asked whether AT(1) receptor antagonists could exert anti-inflammatory effects in the brain vasculature as a mechanism for their protective effects against ischemia. As determined by immunohistochemistry, long-term inhibition of brain AT(1) receptors by peripheral administration of the AT(1) receptor antagonist candesartan (0.3 mg/kg/day for 28 days) normalized the pathologic remodeling, decreased expression of the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and the number of associated macrophages, and normalized the endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression in cerebral vessels of SHR. The anti-inflammatory effects of AT(1) receptor antagonists may be an important mechanism for protection against ischemia and could participate in the anti-stress properties of this class of compounds.

Angiotensin II AT 1 Receptor Blockade Reverses Pathological Hypertrophy and Inflammation in Brain Microvessels of Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) is vulnerable to brain ischemia and stress and exhibits a chronically stimulated brain angiotensin II system, cerebrovascular hypertrophy, and inflammation. Pretreatment with angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists protects from brain ischemia and from stress and prevents the development of stress-induced gastric ulcers in part by reducing inflammation in the gastric mucosa. We studied whether AT1 receptor antagonists could exert antiinflammatory effects in the brain vasculature as a mechanism for their protective effects against ischemia. Ten-week-old SHR and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto male rats received the AT1 receptor antagonist candesartan (0.3 mg/kg per day) or vehicle for 28 days via osmotic minipumps. We studied AT1 receptors, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), and number of macrophages by immunohistochemistry and Western blots. We found increased endothelial AT1 receptor expression of brain microvessels and middle cerebral artery of SHR. Brain AT1 receptor inhibition reversed the pathological vascular hypertrophy, increased and normalized eNOS expression, and decreased ICAM-1 expression and the number of adherent and infiltrating macrophages in cerebral vessels of SHR. The antiinflammatory effects of AT1 receptor antagonists may be an important mechanism in protecting against ischemia.

Neurohumoral mechanism in the natriuretic action of intracerebroventricular administration of renin.

Intracerebroventricular (i.v.t.) administration of renin (R) decreases urinary volume and increases urinary sodium excretion. We investigated whether i.v.t.-R-induced natriuresis could be associated with the release of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), its interaction with renal ANP-A receptors (ANPR-A) and the subsequent increase of urinary cyclic 3-5 guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). In i.v.t. cannulated rats, the left carotid artery was catheterised with PE-50 tubing for blood collection, renin was injected i.v.t. and arterial blood samples were collected at 0, 2, 5, 10 and 15 minutes of injection, and urinary sodium and cGMP excretion at 1-, 3- and 6-hour periods of urine collection. Plasma ANP levels and urinary cGMP were determined by radioimmunoassay, and each urine sample was analysed for sodium concentration using a flame photometer. Our results demonstrate that i.v.t.-R administration increases plasma ANP levels after two minutes of injection and urinary cGMP concentration at 1-, 3- and 6 hour period of urine collection. The natriuretic action induced by i.v.t.-R was blunted by peripheral administration of anantin, an ANPR-A antagonist. We assessed the role of brain angiotensin II (Ang II) AT1-receptors on the i.v.t.-induced antidiuresis, natriuresis and cGMP urinary excretion, the last as an indirect index of ANP secretion. Blockade of brain Ang II AT1-receptors with losartan (LOS; 120 microg/3 microl, i.v.t.), inhibited the antidiuretic action and blocked the increased urinary sodium and cGMP excretion induced by i.v.t.-R (7.14 mGU/5 microl). The increase in urinary cGMP was independent of nitric oxide synthase stimulation, since L-NAME pre-treatment did not alter the renal actions induced by i.v.t.-R. Our results suggest that there is a link between the brain and the kidney. The activation of brain angiotensinergic neurons and stimulation of AT1- receptors may stimulate the release of ANP to the circulation. The released ANP circulates to the kidneys where it acts through renal ANPR-As and the consequent increase in cGMP to produce natriuresis.

Norleucine 1-Angiotensin IV alleviates mecamylamine-induced spatial memory deficits

The brain angiotensin AT 4 receptor subtype has been implicated in cognitive processing. We initially established that intracerebroventricular administration of the nAChR-antagonist mecamylamine (mec) interfered with spatial memory performance in male Sprague–Dawley rats. Next we demonstrated that mec-induced deficits in spatial memory were overcome by the AT 4 receptor-agonist Norleucine 1-Angiotensin IV (Nle 1-Ang IV). Nle 1-Ang IV could not, however, compensate for spatial learning impairments precipitated by both mec and the mAChR-antagonist scopolamine. These findings support the importance of the AT 4 receptor in cognitive processing and suggest that the ability of Nle 1-Ang IV to improve spatial memory deficiencies may be dependant upon the brain cholinergic system.

Stress and angiotensin II: novel therapeutic opportunities.

Angiotensin II was initially described as a hormone of peripheral origin, the active end product of the Renin-Angiotensin System. The subsequent discovery that Angiotensin II was locally formed and selectively regulated in most organs indicated that tissue Angiotensin II systems might play additional important roles. After initial controversy, the presence of an Angiotensin II system in the brain is now universally accepted. Brain Angiotensin II is probably involved in the regulation of many brain functions. Angiotensin II AT1 receptors are localized not only in areas related to the regulation of autonomic and endocrine control, but also in many other areas of the brain involved in emotional, sensory and motor functions. Angiotensin II AT2 receptors are more abundant in brain areas related to sensory and motor control. The roles of brain Angiotensin II appear to be multiple and complex. In addition to a regulatory role in the control of the autonomic and hormone systems, the peptide participates in brain development, sensory processes, cognition and in the regulation of cerebrovascular flow. Recent developments indicate that blockade of the brain Angiotensin II AT1 receptors not only contributes to a significant blood pressure decrease in hypertension, but that simultaneous antagonism of peripheral and brain AT1 receptors reduces the sympathoadrenal and hormonal responses to stress and prevents stress-induced gastric injury. A novel role emerges for the use of peripheral and centrally acting AT1 receptor antagonists as therapeutically advantageous for the treatment of stress-related disorders.

Is there a role for brain angiotensin in the control of food intake?

Is there a role for brain angiotensin in the control of food intake?

Récepteurs de l’angiotensine dans le cerveau et adaptation au stress

In this short review, we hypothesize that the central renin-angiotensin system might participate to the initiation of compensatory responses to a stressor agent. Regulation of the expression of the brain angiotensin receptors might constitute a primary molecular mechanism by which this protecting action would take place. We illustrate this possibility by investigating the expression of the angiotensin type 1 receptor in the hypothalamus in response to systemic and neurogenic stressors.

Body sodium and volume homeostasis.

maintenance of a “milieu interieur,” which allows our cells to function away from the ancient sea, is one of the most important functions of the body. Maintenance of constant extracellular osmolarity and sodium concentration depends on a precise balance between intake and excretion of sodium and

Intracisternal administration of Angiotensin II AT 1 receptor antisense oligodeoxynucleotides protects against cerebral ischemia in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Pharmacological blockade of peripheral and brain Angiotensin II (Ang II) AT 1 receptors protects against brain ischemia. To clarify the protective role of brain AT 1 receptors, we examined the effects of specific antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (AS-ODN) targeted to AT 1 receptor mRNA administered intracisternally to spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), 4 and 7 days before middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion, and we determined the infarct size and tissue swelling 24 h after surgery. A single intracisternal injection of AT 1 mRNA receptor antisense oligodeoxynucleotides reduced systemic blood pressure for 5 days and AT 1 receptor binding for at least 4 days in the area postrema and the nucleus of the solitary tract. A similar injection of scrambled oligodeoxynucleotides (SC-ODN) was without effect. Both blood pressure and AT 1 receptor binding returned to normal 7 days after antisense receptor mRNA administration. Both the infarction size and the tissue swelling after middle cerebral artery occlusion were reduced when the antisense oligodeoxynucleotide was administered 7 days, but not 4 days, before the operation. We conclude that 4 to 5 days of decrease in brain AT 1 receptor binding by a single administration of an AT 1 receptor mRNA oligodeoxynucleotide are sufficient to significantly protect the brain against ischemia resulting from total occlusion of a major cerebral vessel.

Symposium

Symposium

Conversion of brain angiotensin II to angiotensin III is critical for pressor response in rats.

The present investigation measured the relative pressor potencies of intracerebroventricularly infused ANG II, ANG III, and the metabolically resistant analogs d-Asp(1)ANG II and d-Arg(1)ANG III in alert freely moving rats. The stability of these analogs was further facilitated by pretreatment with the specific aminopeptidase A inhibitor EC33 or the aminopeptidase N inhibitor PC18. The results indicate that the maximum elevations in mean arterial pressure (MAP) were very similar for each of these compounds across the dose range 1, 10, and 100 pmol/min during a 5-min infusion period. However, d-Asp(1)ANG II revealed significantly extended durations of pressor effects before return to base level MAP. Pretreatment intracerebroventricular infusion with EC33 blocked the pressor activity induced by the subsequent infusion of d-Asp(1)ANG II, whereas EC33 had no effect on the pressor response to subsequent infusion of d-Arg(1)ANG III. In contrast, pretreatment infusion with PC18 extended the duration of the d-Asp(1)ANG II pressor effect by about two to three times and the duration of d-Arg(1)ANG III's effect by approximately 10 to 15 times. Pretreatment with the specific AT(1) receptor antagonist losartan blocked the pressor responses induced by the subsequent infusion of both analogs indicating that they act via the AT(1) receptor subtype. These results suggest that the brain AT(1) receptor may be designed to preferentially respond to ANG III, and ANG III's importance as a centrally active ligand has been underestimated.