BRAF Mutations In Patients Research Articles

Early onset MSI-H colon cancer with MLH1 promoter methylation, is there a genetic predisposition?

BackgroundTo investigate the etiology of MLH1 promoter methylation in mismatch repair (MMR) mutation-negative early onset MSI-H colon cancer. As this type of colon cancer is associated with high ages, young patients bearing this type of malignancy are rare and could provide additional insight into the etiology of sporadic MSI-H colon cancer.MethodsWe studied a set of 46 MSI-H colon tumors cases with MLH1 promoter methylation which was enriched for patients with an age of onset below 50 years (n = 13). Tumors were tested for CIMP marker methylation and mutations linked to methylation: BRAF, KRAS, GADD45A and the MLH1 -93G>A polymorphism. When available, normal colon and leukocyte DNA was tested for GADD45A mutations and germline MLH1 methylation. SNP array analysis was performed on a subset of tumors.ResultsWe identified two cases (33 and 60 years) with MLH1 germline promoter methylation. BRAF mutations were less frequent in colon cancer patients below 50 years relative to patients above 50 years (p-value: 0.044). CIMP-high was infrequent and related to BRAF mutations in patients below 50 years. In comparison with published controls the G>A polymorphism was associated with our cohort. Although similar distribution of the pathogenic A allele was observed in the patients with an age of onset above and below 50 years, the significance for the association was lost for the group under 50 years. GADD45A sequencing yielded an unclassified variant. Tumors from both age groups showed infrequent copy number changes and loss-of-heterozygosity.ConclusionSomatic or germline GADD45A mutations did not explain sporadic MSI-H colon cancer. Although germline MLH1 methylation was found in two individuals, locus-specific somatic MLH1 hypermethylation explained the majority of sporadic early onset MSI-H colon cancer cases. Our data do not suggest an intrinsic tendency for CpG island hypermethylation in these early onset MSI-H tumors other than through somatic mutation of BRAF.

Prognostic and predictive value of TOPK stratified by KRAS and BRAF gene alterations in sporadic, hereditary and metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Background:Our aim was to investigate the prognostic and predictive value of the oncogenic MAPKK-like protein T-cell-originated protein kinase (TOPK) stratified by KRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with sporadic, hereditary and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with anti-EGFR therapy.Methods:Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for TOPK was performed on four study groups. Group 1 included two subgroups of 543 and 501 sporadic CRC patients used to test the reliability of TOPK expression by IHC. In Group 2, representing an additional 222 sporadic CRCs, the prognostic effect of TOPK stratified by KRAS and BRAF was assessed. The prognostic effect of TOPK was further analysed in Group 3, representing 71 hereditary Lynch syndrome-associated CRC patients. In Group 4, the predictive and prognostic value of TOPK was analysed on 45 metastatic patients treated with cetuximab or panitumumab stratified by KRAS and BRAF gene status.Results:In both sporadic CRC subgroups (Group 1), associations of diffuse TOPK expression with clinicopathological features were reproducible. Molecular analysis of sporadic CRCs in Group 2 showed that diffuse TOPK expression was associated with KRAS and BRAF mutations (p<0.001) and with poor outcome in patients with either mutation in univariate and multivariate analysis (P=0.017). In hereditary patients (Group 3), diffuse TOPK was linked to advanced pT stage. In metastatic patients treated with anti-EGFR therapy (Group 4), diffuse TOPK expression was linked to dismal outcome despite objective response to treatment (P=0.01).Conclusions:TOPK expression is an unfavourable prognostic indicator in sporadic patients with KRAS or BRAF mutations and also in patients with metastatic disease experiencing a response to anti-EGFR therapies. The inhibition of TOPK, which could benefit 30–40% of CRC patients, may represent a new avenue of investigation for targeted therapy.

KRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy

Background and purpose KRAS and BRAF are mutated in 35% and 10% of colorectal cancers, respectively. However, data specifically for locally advanced rectal cancers are scarce, and the frequency of KRAS mutations in codons 61 and 146 remains to be established. Materials and methods DNA was isolated from pre-therapeutic biopsies of 94 patients who were treated within two phase-III clinical trials receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Mutation status of KRAS exons 1–3 and BRAF exon 15 was established using the ABI PRISM Big Dye Sequencing Kit and subsequently correlated with clinical parameters. Results Overall, KRAS was mutated in 45 patients (48%). Twenty-nine mutations (64%) were located in codon 12, 10 mutations (22%) in codon 13, and 3 mutations (7%) in codons 61 and 146. No V600E BRAF mutation was detected. The presence of KRAS mutations was correlated neither with tumor response or lymph node status after preoperative chemoradiotherapy nor with overall survival or disease-free survival. When KRAS exon 1 mutations were separated based on the amino-acid exchange, we again failed to detect significant correlations ( p = 0.052). However, G12V mutations appeared to be associated with higher rates of tumor regression than G13D mutations ( p = 0.012). Conclusion We are the first to report the mutation status of KRAS and BRAF in pre-therapeutic biopsies from locally advanced rectal cancers. The high number of KRAS mutations in codons 61 and 146 emphasizes the importance to expand current mutation analyses, whereas BRAF mutations are not relevant for rectal carcinogenesis. Although the KRAS mutation status was not correlated with response, the subtle difference between G12V and G13D mutations warrants analysis of a larger patient population.

Lack of Correlation between IGFBP7 Expression and BRAF Mutational Status in Melanoma

Lack of Correlation between IGFBP7 Expression and BRAF Mutational Status in Melanoma

SP160 Targeted therapies directed against EML4-ALK translocations and BRAF mutations in patients with lung cancer

SP160 Targeted therapies directed against EML4-ALK translocations and BRAF mutations in patients with lung cancer

1016 Prognostic and predictive significance of BRAF mutation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with 5-fluorouracil-based 1st line chemotherapy

1016 Prognostic and predictive significance of BRAF mutation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with 5-fluorouracil-based 1st line chemotherapy

Associations of dietary methyl donor intake with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and related molecular phenotypes in sporadic colorectal cancer

Intake of dietary factors that serve as methyl group donors may influence promoter hypermethylation in colorectal carcinogenesis. We investigated whether dietary folate, vitamin B2 and vitamin B6, methionine and alcohol were associated with mutL homologue 1 (MLH1) hypermethylation and the related molecular phenotypes of MLH1 protein expression, microsatellite instability (MSI) and BRAF mutations in patients with colorectal carcinomas. Within the Netherlands Cohort Study on diet and cancer (n = 120 852), 648 cases (367 men and 281 women) and 4059 subcohort members were available for data analyses from a follow-up period between 2.3 and 7.3 years after baseline. Gender-specific adjusted incidence rate ratios (RRs) were calculated over categories of dietary intake in case-cohort analyses. The intakes of folate, vitamin B2, methionine and alcohol were not associated with risk of tumors showing MLH1 hypermethylation, those lacking MLH1 protein expression or with MSI. Among men, we observed strong positive associations between folate and BRAF-mutated tumors (RR = 3.04 for the highest versus lowest tertile of intake, P(trend) = 0.03) and between vitamin B6 and tumors showing MLH1 hypermethylation (highest versus lowest tertile: RR = 3.23, P(trend) = 0.03). Among women, the relative risks of tumors with BRAF mutations or MLH1 hypermethylation were also increased in the highest tertiles of folate and vitamin B6 intake, respectively, but these did not reach statistical significance. The positive associations between folate intake and tumors harboring BRAF mutations and between vitamin B6 intake and those showing MLH1 hypermethylation were most pronounced among men and may suggest that these vitamins enhance colorectal cancer risk through genetic as well as epigenetic aberrations.

Distinguishing Costello versus cardio‐facio‐cutaneous syndrome: BRAF mutations in patients with a Costello phenotype

Distinguishing Costello versus cardio‐facio‐cutaneous syndrome: <i>BRAF</i> mutations in patients with a Costello phenotype

BRAF Mutation Predicts a Poorer Clinical Prognosis for Papillary Thyroid Cancer

Use of BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) has the potential to improve risk stratification of this cancer. The objective of the study was to investigate the prognostic value of BRAF mutation in patients with PTC. In a multicenter study of 219 PTC patients, data on their clinicopathological characteristics and clinical courses between 1990 and 2004 were retrospectively collected, and their tumor BRAF mutation status was determined. Associations of BRAF mutation with initial tumor characteristics and subsequent recurrence were analyzed. Relationships between the BRAF mutation status and clinicopathological outcomes, including recurrence, were measured. We found a significant association between BRAF mutation and extrathyroidal invasion (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001), and advanced tumor stage III/IV (P = 0.007) at initial surgery. This association remained significant on multivariate analysis, adjusting for conventional clinicopathological predictors of recurrence excluding the histological PTC subtype, but was lost when the tumor subtype was included in the model. BRAF mutation was also significantly associated with tumor recurrence, 25 vs. 9% with and without mutation, respectively (P = 0.004), during a median of 15 (interquartile range, 3-29) months of follow-up. This association remained significant on multivariate analysis adjusting for conventional clinicopathological predictors of recurrence, even including the PTC subtype (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-14.1; P = 0.03). BRAF mutation was even an independent predictor of recurrence in patients with stage I/II disease, 22 vs. 5% with and without BRAF mutation, respectively (P = 0.002). BRAF mutation was also more frequently associated with absence of tumor I-131 avidity and treatment failure of recurrent disease. In patients with PTC, BRAF mutation is associated with poorer clinicopathological outcomes and independently predicts recurrence. Therefore, BRAF mutation may be a useful molecular marker to assist in risk stratification for patients with PTC.