BRAF Gene Fusions Research Articles

Update on Superficial Spindle Cell Mesenchymal Tumors in Children.

The diagnosis of cutaneous and subcutaneous spindle cell neoplasms in children is often challenging and has potential therapeutic and prognostic implications. Although correctly diagnosing dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and infantile fibrosarcoma is paramount, pathologists should not ignore a number of diagnostic pitfalls linked to mostly rare tumors with completely different clinical outcomes. In the last decade, a spectrum of novel entities has been described; information from molecular biology has helped to shape this new landscape for spindle cell tumors. Here, we review the most noteworthy neoplasms in this spectrum, with a focus on their histological similarities: fibroblastic connective tissue nevus, medallion-like dermal dendrocyte hamartoma, or plaque-like CD34-positive dermal fibroma, which share features with fibrous hamartoma of infancy; lipofibromatosis and lipofibromatosis-like neural tumor; and plexiform myofibroblastoma, a recently described neoplasm that should be distinguished from plexiform fibrohistiocytic tumor. These tumors also have genetic similarities, particularly gene rearrangements involving NTRK3 or NTRK1. These genetic features are not only essential for the differential diagnosis of infantile fibrosarcoma but are also of diagnostic value for lipofibromatosis-like neural tumors. The more recently described RET, RAF1, and BRAF gene fusions are also discussed.

BRAF fusions in pediatric histiocytic neoplasms define distinct therapeutic responsiveness to RAF paradox breakers.

Pediatric histiocytic neoplasms are hematopoietic disorders frequently driven by the BRAF-V600E mutation. Here, we identified two BRAF gene fusions (novel MTAP-BRAF and MS4A6A-BRAF) in two aggressive histiocytic neoplasms. In contrast to previously described BRAF fusions, MTAP-BRAF and MS4A6A-BRAF do not respond to the paradox breaker RAF inhibitor (RAFi) PLX8394 due to stable fusion dimerization mediated by the N-terminal fusion partners. This highlights a significant and clinically relevant shift from the current dogma that BRAF-fusions respond similarly to BRAF-inhibitors. As an alternative, we show suppression of fusion-driven oncogenic growth with the pan-RAFi LY3009120 and MEK inhibition.

Molecular Heterogeneity of High Grade Colorectal Adenocarcinoma.

Simple SummaryDue to its low frequency, high grade colorectal carcinomas (HG-CRCs) are underrepresented in molecular series. We intended to further characterize the pathological and molecular features of these tumors. In addition, morphologically different areas when present, were analyzed separately to study tumor heterogeneity. We found that most (72.5%) of HG-CRCs showed mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency. MMR status conditioned the frequency and the clonality of the molecular alterations found. Thus, whereas BRAF mutations and gene fusions were observed only in MMR deficient (MMRd) tumors, TP53, KRAS, and gene amplifications predominated in MMR proficient (MMRp) tumors. In MMRp tumors, gene amplification was a mechanism of progression, whereas the accumulation of mutations in genes of different pathways such as NOTCH, MMR or PIK3CA was involved in the clonal diversity of MMRd HG-CRC. In summary, intertumor and intratumor molecular heterogeneity in HG-CRCs is mainly due to MMR status.High grade colorectal carcinomas (HG-CRCs), which comprise 15% of colorectal carcinomas, are underrepresented in reported molecular studies. Clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of 40 HG-CRCs are described. Moreover, glandular and solid areas of 25 tumors were separately analyzed. The expression of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6, p53, E-cadherin, CDX2, CK20, CD8, PDL1, PAN-TRK, c-MET, SMARCB1, ARID1A, SMARCA2, and SMARCA4 was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Promoter MLH1 methylation was analyzed in tumors with MLH1/PMS2 loss. Next-generation sequencing was used to screen 161 genes for hotspot mutations, copy number variations and gene fusions. In this series, 72.5% of HG-CRCs showed mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). MMR deficient tumor and MMR proficient (MMRp) tumors showed striking molecular differences. Thus, whereas BRAF mutations were only observed in MMRd tumors, mutations in KRAS and TP53 were more frequent in MMR proficient tumors. Moreover, gene fusions (NTRK1 and MET) were detected only in MMRd tumors, whereas gene amplification (MYC, CCND1 and EGFR) predominated in MMRp/TP53-mutated tumors. Loss of expression of proteins involved in chromatin remodeling, such as ARID1A, was observed only in MMRd HG-CRCs, which also showed more frequently PD-L1 expression and a higher number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. The separate analysis of glandular and solid areas indicated that the clonal or subclonal nature of the molecular alterations also depended on MMR status. Mutations in genes such as TP53 and KRAS were always clonal in MMRp-CRCs but occurred as subclonal events in MMRd-CRCs. Gene amplification was implicated in the progression of MMRp tumors, but not in MMRd tumors, in which clonal diversity was due to accumulation of mutations in genes of different pathways such as NOTCH, MMR, or PIK3CA. In summary, intertumor and intratumor molecular heterogeneity in HG-CRCs is mainly due to MMR status.

LGG-28. NOVEL BRAF INTRAGENIC DELETION IN A GLIOMA: A CASE REPORT OF A PEDIATRIC PATIENT

BACKGROUNDNumerous variant BRAF genetic alterations have been associated with malignancies. BRAF activating fusions/mutations are frequently present in low grade gliomas. BRAF intragenic deletions have been reported in melanoma, but have not previously been reported in gliomas.OBJECTIVETo report a BRAF intragenic deletion in a pediatric patient with recurrent low-grade glioma.RESULTSA 3-year-old female underwent a complete resection of a posterior fossa pilocytic astrocytoma. She had recurrences at age 4, and then at age 9; pathology was consistent with pilocytic astrocytoma. Microarray analysis on sample from the first recurrence showed one region of loss encompassing 86 Kbp within the BRAF gene. The deletion breakpoints are within intron 1 and 9, resulting in loss of exons 2 through 9, inclusive. This has been previously described melanoma, but appears to be a novel finding in glioma. It is hypothesized that, since the loss retains the kinase and ATP binding pocket domains but deletes the N-terminal conserved region 1 and 2 (CR1, CR2) of the BRAF gene, it is likely functionally similar to the loss and activation resulting from the more usually described KIAA1549 and BRAF gene fusion.CONCLUSIONThis is the first BRAF intragenic deletion involving exons 2–9 reported in a glioma. Although 86kbp is small using whole genome microarray technology, it is large using sequencing strategies, and a targeted sequencing approach to investigate the BRAF gene would not readily identify this deletion. It is speculated that the deletion may be under ascertained in the pediatric population.

Integrated DNA and RNA sequencing reveals targetable alterations in metastatic pediatric papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Pediatric papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is clinically and biologically distinct from adult PTC. We sequenced a cohort of clinically annotated pediatric PTC cases enriched for high-risk tumors to identify genetic alterations of relevance for diagnosis and therapy. Tumor DNA and RNA were extracted from FFPE tissue and subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS) library preparation using a custom 124-gene hybridization capture panel and the 75-gene Archer Oncology Research Panel, respectively. NGS libraries were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq. Thirty-six pediatric PTC cases were analyzed. Metastases were frequently observed to cervical lymph nodes (29/36, 81%), with pulmonary metastases less commonly found (10/36, 28%). Relapsed or refractory disease occurred in 18 patients (18/36, 50%). DNA sequencing revealed targetable mutations in 8 of 31 tumors tested (26%), most commonly BRAF p.V600E (n=6). RNA sequencing identified targetable fusions in 13 of 25 tumors tested (52%): RET (n=8), NTRK3 (n=4), and BRAF. Mutually exclusive targetable alterations were discovered in 15 of the 20 tumors (75%) with both DNA and RNA analyzed. Fusion-positive PTC was associated with multifocal disease, higher tumor staging, and higher American Thyroid Association risk levels. Both BRAF V600E mutations and gene fusions were correlated with the presence of cervical metastases. Targetable alterations were identified in 75% of pediatric PTC cases with both DNA and RNA evaluated. Inclusion of RNA sequencing for detection of fusion genes is critical for evaluation of these tumors. Patients with fusion-positive tumors were more likely to have features of high-risk disease.

Abstract 632: Novel BRAF gene fusions in pediatric histiocytic neoplasms respond differentially to RAF targeted therapies based on dimerization profiles

Abstract Introduction: Pediatric histiocytic neoplasms are clonal hematopoietic disorders driven by mutations activating the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, such as BRAF- V600E. In non-BRAFV600E cases, we investigated alternative MAPK mutations and found two novel BRAF gene fusions. We have previously shown effective targeting of BRAF fusions (KIAA1549-BRAF) in pediatric low-grade gliomas (PLGGs) with paradox breaker RAF inhibitor (RAFi), PLX8394 and MEK inhibitors (MEKi). Here, we investigate the distinct responsiveness of novel BRAF fusions to RAFi therapies and explore the mechanistic basis of such differential responses compared to other BRAF fusions. Method: Two histiocytic patient tumors were analyzed using the CHOP Comprehensive Next- Gen Sequencing Solid Tumor Panel and a targeted RNA-seq panel for 106 fusion partner genes. Novel BRAF fusions identified were sub-cloned to create heterologous cell models. Immunoblotting of serum starved cells measured MAPK and PI3K pathway activation and soft agar assay tested for oncogenic phenotypes driven by BRAF fusions, along with response to PLX8394, LY3009120 (pan-RAF dimer inhibitor), and MEKi. Co-immunoprecipitation assays using Myc- and Flag-tagged BRAF fusion constructs assessed dimerization profiles, with or without inhibitors. Result: In the two M- and L-type histiocytic neoplasms assessed, we found novel and rare BRAF gene fusions, MTAP-BRAF and MS4A6A-BRAF, respectively. Both BRAF fusions activated the MAPK/ PI3K pathways and showed homo- and hetero-dimerization with BRAF and the respective N-terminal fusion partner. Compared to common BRAF fusions, MTAP-BRAF and MS4A6A- BRAF did not respond to PLX8394 due to no disruption of active fusion homo- and hetero-dimers, which was in turn was due to the untargeted, stable dimerization mediated by the N-terminal fusion partners. Conversely, we observed robust suppression with LY3009120 that bound fusion dimers and kept them in an inactivate confirmation. MEKi selumetinib and trametinib also suppressed fusion driven signaling and oncogenic phenotypes. Conclusion: We show that novel MTAP-BRAF and MS4A6A-BRAF fusions, found in histiocytic tumors, do not respond to RAFi PLX8394 but are targeted by LY3009120 or MEKi. Our finding that PLX8394 does not disrupt MTAP-BRAF or MS4A6A-BRAF dimerization due to contribution of N-terminal partners defines a novel paradigm for the distinct mechanisms sought by BRAF fusions in response to RAFi therapy. We show potent suppression of these mechanistically distinct BRAF fusions with MEKi or LY3009120 which function independent of vulnerability to fusion dimerization. Overall, this study highlights the unique and differential biology hijacked by BRAF fusions in response to RAFi and further warrants detailed mechanistic classification of BRAF fusions based on their responsiveness to targeted agents. Citation Format: Payal Jain, Lea F. Surrey, Joshua Straka, Pierre Russo, Richard Womer, Marilyn Li, Phillip B. Storm, Angela J. Waanders, Michael Hogarty, Jennifer Picarsic, Adam C. Resnick. Novel BRAF gene fusions in pediatric histiocytic neoplasms respond differentially to RAF targeted therapies based on dimerization profiles [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 632.

Molecular testing on bronchial washings for the diagnosis and predictive assessment of lung cancer.

Cytopathological analyses of bronchial washings (BWs) collected during fibre‐optic bronchoscopy are often inconclusive for lung cancer diagnosis. To address this issue, we assessed the suitability of conducting molecular analyses on BWs, with the aim to improve the diagnosis and outcome prediction of lung cancer. The methylation status of RASSF1A, CDH1, DLC1 and PRPH was analysed in BW samples from 91 lung cancer patients and 31 controls, using a novel two‐colour droplet digital methylation‐specific PCR (ddMSP) technique. Mutations in ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, KRAS, MAP2K1, MET, NRAS, PIK3CA, ROS1 and TP53 and gene fusions of ALK, RET and ROS1 were also investigated, using next‐generation sequencing on 73 lung cancer patients and 14 tumour‐free individuals. Our four‐gene methylation panel had significant diagnostic power, with 97% sensitivity and 74% specificity (relative risk, 7.3; odds ratio, 6.1; 95% confidence interval, 12.7–127). In contrast, gene mutation analysis had a remarkable value for predictive, but not for diagnostic, purposes. Actionable mutations in EGFR, HER2 and ROS1 as well as in other cancer genes (KRAS, PIK3CA and TP53) were detected. Concordance with gene mutations uncovered in tumour biopsies was higher than 90%. In addition, bronchial‐washing analyses permitted complete patient coverage and the detection of additional actionable mutations. In conclusion, BWs are a useful material on which to perform molecular tests based on gene panels: aberrant gene methylation and mutation analyses could be performed as approaches accompanying current diagnostic and predictive assays during the initial workup phase. This study establishes the grounds for further prospective investigation.

Abstract IA25: Modeling cancer in the CRISPR era

Abstract Chromosomal rearrangements are common cancer-associated mutations that often result in the generation of therapeutically actionable gene fusions. Unfortunately, until recently this class of mutations has proved challenging to recapitulate using conventional gene-targeting methods. To overcome this limitation, we have recently developed a CRISPR-based strategy to model a broad range of chromosomal rearrangements, including inversions, deletions, translocations, and tandem duplications (Maddalo et al., 2014). Since this strategy can be used to induce the desired chromosomal rearrangement in somatic cells—ex vivo or directly in vivo—of adult animals, it enables the rapid and cost-effective generation of novel mouse models of human cancer. As proof of concept, we have applied this strategy to generate a novel model of EML4-ALK driven lung adenocarcinoma, and to show that a novel gene fusion observed in a few human gliomas is a potent oncogenic driver and therapeutic target (Cook et al., 2017; Maddalo et al., 2014; Ventura, Dow, 2018). In my presentation, I will discuss how my group is using these novel technologies, as well as conventional gene-targeting methods, to recapitulate the genetic complexity of human cancers in vivo. I will present new and unpublished models of pediatric brain cancers driven by BRAF gene fusions we have recently generated using in vivo and ex vivo CRISPR-mediated chromosomal engineering and show how we are using these models to test novel therapeutic strategies and to gain insights into the molecular pathogenesis of human cancers.

Diverse BRAF Gene Fusions Confer Resistance to EGFR-Targeted Therapy via Differential Modulation of BRAF Activity.

Fusion genes can be oncogenic drivers in a variety of cancer types and represent potential targets for targeted therapy. The BRAF gene is frequently involved in oncogenic gene fusions, with fusion frequencies of 0.2%-3% throughout different cancers. However, BRAF fusions rarely occur in the same gene configuration, potentially challenging personalized therapy design. In particular, the impact of the wide variety of fusion partners on the oncogenic role of BRAF during tumor growth and drug response is unknown. Here, we used patient-derived colorectal cancer organoids to functionally characterize and cross-compare BRAF fusions containing various partner genes (AGAP3, DLG1, and TRIM24) with respect to cellular behavior, downstream signaling activation, and response to targeted therapies. We demonstrate that 5' fusion partners mainly promote canonical oncogenic BRAF activity by replacing the auto-inhibitory N-terminal region. In addition, the 5' partner of BRAF fusions influences their subcellular localization and intracellular signaling capacity, revealing distinct subsets of affected signaling pathways and altered gene expression. Presence of the different BRAF fusions resulted in varying sensitivities to combinatorial inhibition of MEK and the EGF receptor family. However, all BRAF fusions conveyed resistance to targeted monotherapy against the EGF receptor family, suggesting that BRAF fusions should be screened alongside other MAPK pathway alterations to identify patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to exclude from anti-EGFR-targeted treatment. IMPLICATIONS: Although intracellular signaling and sensitivity to targeted therapies of BRAF fusion genes are influenced by their 5' fusion partner, we show that all investigated BRAF fusions confer resistance to clinically relevant EGFR inhibition.

Deep sequencing of myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma.

Myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma (MIFS) has recurrent genetic features in the form of a translocation t(1;10)(p22-31;q24-25), BRAF gene fusions, and/or an amplicon in 3p11-12 including the VGLL3 gene. The breakpoints on chromosomes 1 and 10 in the t(1;10) cluster in or near the TGFBR3 and OGA genes, respectively. We here used a combination of deep sequencing of the genome (WGS), captured sequences (Cap-seq), and transcriptome (RNA-seq) and genomic arrays to investigate the molecular outcome of the t(1;10) and the VGLL3 amplicon, as well as to assess the spectrum of other recurrent genomic features in MIFS. Apart from a ROBO1-BRAF chimera in a t(1;10)-negative MIFS-like tumor, no fusion gene was found at RNA-seq. This was in line with WGS and Cap-seq results, revealing variable breakpoints in chromosomes 1 and 10 and genomic breakpoints that should not yield functional fusion transcripts. The most common genomic rearrangements were breakpoints in or around the OGA, NPM3, and FGF8 genes in chromosome band 10q24, and loss of 1p11-p21 and 10q26-qter (all simultaneously present in 6/7 MIFS); a breakpoint in or near TGFBR3 in chromosome 1 was found in four of these tumors. Amplification and overexpression of VGLL3 was a consistent feature in MIFS and MIFS-like tumors with amplicons in 3p11-12. The significant molecular genetic outcome of the recurrent t(1;10) could be loss of genetic material from 1p and 10q. Other recurrent genomic imbalances in MIFS, such as homozygous loss of CDKN2A and 3p- and 13q-deletions, are shared with other sarcomas, suggesting overlapping pathogenetic pathways.

Feasibility of precision cancer medicine in advanced gynaecologic cancers

Abstract Background Advanced gynecologic cancers have a poor prognosis and constitute a major challenge for adequate treatment strategies. By analyzing and targeting molecular alterations, precision cancer medicine (PCM) may be a viable option for the treatment of advanced gynecologic cancers. Methods In this single center, real-world retrospective analysis of our PCM platform, we describe the molecular profiling of 72 patients diagnosed with different types of metastasized BTC. Tumor samples of the patients were examined by a 162-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and RNA fusion panel. Results In total, we identified 209 molecular aberrations in 72 patients. The ten most frequently alterations were TP53 (n = 42), KRAS (n = 14), PIK3CA (n = 11), PIK3R1 (n = 9), ATR (n = 8), PTEN (n = 8), BRCA1 (n = 6), NF1 (n = 4), NOTCH1 (n = 4), POLE (n = 4) that make up together over half of the molecular alterations (52.6%). BRAF mutations and gene fusions each were observed in two patients. 21 patients were found to have only one mutation and 44 patients had more than one mutation. No mutations were detected in 7 patients. IHC detected expression of p-mTOR and EGFR in 58 and 53 patients, respectively. In over two-thirds (n = 51) of the 72 patients, a targeted therapy was suggested, based on the identified genetic mutations. The most frequently recommended specific treatment was the combination of everolimus with exemestan (n = 19). The median turnaround time from biopsy to discussion in our multidisciplinary tumor board was 20 days. The median turnaround time from biopsy to therapy initiation was 26 days. Conclusions Based on our observations, it seems that PCM might be a feasible treatment approach for advanced gynecologic cancers with limited treatment options. Legal entity responsible for the study Medical University of Vienna. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure H. Taghizadeh: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Pilocytic astrocytomas: BRAFV600E and BRAF fusion expression patterns in pediatric and adult age groups

Pilocytic astrocytomas (PCAs) are characterized by two dominant molecular alterations of the BRAF gene, i.e., BRAFV600E mutation and KIAA1549-BRAF fusions which show a differential pattern of frequency across different age-groups. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of 358 (pediatric 276 and adult 82) consecutive PCAs were evaluated for BRAFV600E mutation by Sanger sequencing and KIAA1549:BRAF fusion transcripts (KIAA1549:BRAF 16-9, KIAA1549:BRAF 15-9, and KIAA1549:BRAF 16-11) by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, which were correlated with different clinicopathological features. BRAFV600E mutation was detected in 8.9% pediatric and 9.75% adult PCAs, whereas 41.1% and 25.7% of pediatric and adult cases showed KIAA1549-BRAF fusions respectively. BRAFV600E did not show any statistically significant correlation with any of the clinical parameters (age, location, and gender). KIAA1549:BRAF fusions showed a significant statistical association with the pediatric age group and cerebellar location. KIAA1549-BRAF 16-9 was the commonest variant and was predominantly associated with cerebellar location than non-cerebellar whereas fusion variant 15-9 negatively correlated with cerebellar locations. The present study showed overall frequency of53.5% and 37.3% BRAF alterations in pediatric and adult PCA cases respectively. BRAF fusion in PCA cases showed a different distribution pattern across age groups and locations; while no such differential pattern was observed for BRAFV600E.

Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis of myxofibrosarcoma

Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is a common adult soft tissue sarcoma characterized by an infiltrative growth pattern and a high local recurrence rate. Here we report the genetic and epigenetic landscape of MFS based on the results of whole-exome sequencing (N = 41), RNA sequencing (N = 29), and methylation analysis (N = 41), using 41 MFSs as a discovery set, and subsequent targeted sequencing of 140 genes in the entire cohort of 99 MFSs and 17 MFSs' data from TCGA. Fourteen driver genes are identified, including potentially actionable therapeutic targets seen in 37% of cases. There are frequent alterations in p53 signaling (51%) and cell cycle checkpoint genes (43%). Other conceivably actionable driver genes including ATRX, JAK1, NF1, NTRK1, and novel oncogenic BRAF fusion gene are identified. Methylation patterns cluster into three subtypes associated with unique combinations of driver mutations, clinical outcomes, and immune cell compositions. Our results provide a valuable genomic resource to enable the design of precision medicine for MFS.

A FISH assay efficiently screens for BRAF gene rearrangements in pancreatic acinar-type neoplasms

Approximately 1–2% of pancreatic neoplasms are acinar cell carcinomas. Recently, BRAF gene rearrangements were identified in over 20% of acinar-type neoplasms, which included both pure acinar cell carcinomas and mixed carcinomas with acinar differentiation, using next-generation sequencing-based platforms, providing a potential therapeutic target for patients with these neoplasms. Thus, it is clinically important to develop a rapid, cost- and material-efficient assay to screen for BRAF gene fusions in pancreatic acinar-type neoplasms. We developed a dual color, break-apart FISH assay to detect BRAF gene rearrangements in these neoplasms and evaluated its performance in comparison to next-generation sequencing-based studies. A blinded BRAF rearrangement FISH investigation was performed on 31 acinar-type neoplasms that had been studied previously by next-generation sequencing-based analysis as well as on 18 additional acinar-type neoplasms that were accrued over the past 2 years. In total, BRAF fusions were identified in 12/49 (24%) acinar-type neoplasms by FISH. BRAF fusion partners were uncovered by using targeted next-generation sequencing studies in 11 FISH-positive cases that had sufficient material for next-generation sequencing studies. SND1 was the most frequent fusion partner involved in BRAF-fusion acinar-type neoplasms (50%), followed by HERPUD1 (18%). No BRAF fusions were identified by next-generation sequencing in any of the FISH-negative cases investigated. FISH analysis showed that BRAF rearrangements were diffusely present across tumor-rich areas in BRAF-fusion acinar-type neoplasms, which is consistent with an oncogenic driver alteration pattern. Thus, we demonstrated that, in comparison to targeted next-generation sequencing-based technologies, the FISH assay is highly sensitive and specific as well as time- and cost-efficient in the detection of BRAF fusions in acinar-type neoplasms. The FISH assay can be easily implemented in diagnostic settings to identify acinar-type neoplasms patients potentially suitable for targeted therapy to inhibit MAPK pathway activity.

Recurrent BRAF Gene Fusions in a Subset of Pediatric Spindle Cell Sarcomas: Expanding the Genetic Spectrum of Tumors With Overlapping Features With Infantile Fibrosarcoma.

Infantile fibrosarcomas (IFS) represent a distinct group of soft tissue tumors occurring in patients under 2 years of age and most commonly involving the extremities. Most IFS show recurrent ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusions, sensitivity to chemotherapy, and an overall favorable clinical outcome. However, outside these well-defined pathologic features, no studies have investigated IFS lacking ETV6-NTRK3 fusions, or tumors with the morphology resembling IFS in older children. This study was triggered by the identification of a novel SEPT7-BRAF fusion in an unclassified retroperitoneal spindle cell sarcoma in a 16-year-old female by targeted RNA sequencing. Fluorescence in situ hybridization screening of 9 additional tumors with similar phenotype and lacking ETV6-NTRK3 identified 4 additional cases with BRAF gene rearrangements in the pelvic cavity (n=2), paraspinal region (n=1), and thigh (n=1) of young children (0 to 3 y old). Histologically, 4 cases including the index case shared a fascicular growth of packed monomorphic spindle cells, with uniform nuclei and fine chromatin, and a dilated branching vasculature; while the remaining case was composed of compact cellular sheets of short spindle to ovoid cells. In addition, a minor small blue round cell component was present in 1 case. Mitotic activity ranged from 1 to 9/10 high power fields. Immunohistochemical stains were nonspecific, with only focal smooth muscle actin staining demonstrated in 3 cases tested. Of the remaining 5 BRAF negative cases, further RNA sequencing identified 1 case with EML4-NTRK3 in an 1-year-old boy with a foot IFS, and a second case with TPM3-NTRK1 fusion in a 7-week-old infant with a retroperitoneal lesion. Our findings of recurrent BRAF gene rearrangements in tumors showing morphologic overlap with IFS expand the genetic spectrum of fusion-positive spindle cell sarcomas, to include unusual presentations, such as older children and adolescents and predilection for axial location, thereby opening new opportunities for kinase-targeted therapeutic intervention.

Overcoming resistance to single-agent therapy for oncogenic BRAF gene fusions via combinatorial targeting of MAPK and PI3K/mTOR signaling pathways.

Pediatric low-grade gliomas (PLGGs) are frequently associated with activating BRAF gene fusions, such as KIAA1549-BRAF, that aberrantly drive the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Although RAF inhibitors (RAFi) have been proven effective in BRAF-V600E mutant tumors, we have previously shown how the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion can be paradoxically activated by RAFi. While newer classes of RAFi, such as PLX8394, have now been shown to inhibit MAPK activation by KIAA1549-BRAF, we sought to identify alternative MAPK pathway targeting strategies using clinically relevant MEK inhibitors (MEKi), along with potential escape mechanisms of acquired resistance to single-agent MAPK pathway therapies. We demonstrate effectiveness of multiple MEKi against diverse BRAF-fusions with novel N-terminal partners, with trametinib being the most potent. However, resistance to MEKi or PLX8394 develops via increased RTK expression causing activation of PI3K/mTOR pathway in BRAF-fusion expressing resistant clones. To circumvent acquired resistance, we show potency of combinatorial targeting with trametinib and everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor (mTORi) against multiple BRAF-fusions. While single-agent mTORi and MEKi PLGG clinical trials are underway, our study provides preclinical rationales for using MEKi and mTORi combinatorial therapy to stave off or prevent emergent drug-resistance in BRAF-fusion driven PLGGs.

CRAF gene fusions in pediatric low-grade gliomas define a distinct drug response based on dimerization profiles

Pediatric low-grade gliomas (PLGGs) are commonly associated with BRAF gene fusions that aberrantly activate the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. This has led to PLGG clinical trials utilizing RAF- and MAPK pathway-targeted therapeutics. Whole-genome profiling of PLGGs has also identified rare gene fusions involving another RAF isoform, CRAF/RAF1, in PLGGs and cancers occuring in adults. Whereas BRAF fusions primarily dysregulate MAPK signaling, the CRAF fusions QKI-RAF1 and SRGAP3-RAF1 aberrantly activate both the MAPK and phosphoinositide-3 kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/mTOR) signaling pathways. Although ATP-competitive, first-generation RAF inhibitors (vemurafenib/PLX4720, RAFi) cause paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway in BRAF-fusion tumors, inhibition can be achieved with ‘paradox breaker’ RAFi, such as PLX8394. Here we report that, unlike BRAF fusions, CRAF fusions are unresponsive to both generations of RAFi, vemurafenib and PLX8394, highlighting a distinct responsiveness of CRAF fusions to clinically relevant RAFi. Whereas PLX8394 decreased BRAF-fusion dimerization, CRAF-fusion dimerization is unaffected primarily because of robust protein–protein interactions mediated by the N-terminal non-kinase fusion partner, such as QKI. The pan-RAF dimer inhibitor, LY3009120, could suppress CRAF-fusion oncogenicity by inhibiting dimer-mediated signaling. In addition, as CRAF fusions activate both the MAPK and PI3K/mTOR signaling pathways, we identify combinatorial inhibition of the MAPK/mTOR pathway as a potential therapeutic strategy for CRAF-fusion-driven tumors. Overall, we define a mechanistic distinction between PLGG-associated BRAF- and CRAF/RAF1 fusions in response to RAFi, highlighting the importance of molecularly classifying PLGG patients for targeted therapy. Furthermore, our study uncovers an important contribution of the non-kinase fusion partner to oncogenesis and potential therapeutic strategies against PLGG-associated CRAF fusions and possibly pan-cancer CRAF fusions.

A Systematic Analysis of Oncogenic Gene Fusions in Primary Colon Cancer.

Genomic rearrangements that give rise to oncogenic gene fusions can offer actionable targets for cancer therapy. Here we present a systematic analysis of oncogenic gene fusions among a clinically well-characterized, prospectively collected set of 278 primary colon cancers spanning diverse tumor stages and clinical outcomes. Gene fusions and somatic genetic variations were identified in fresh frozen clinical specimens by Illumina RNA-sequencing, the STAR fusion gene detection pipeline, and GATK RNA-seq variant calling. We considered gene fusions to be pathogenically relevant when recurrent, producing divergent gene expression (outlier analysis), or as functionally important (e.g., kinase fusions). Overall, 2.5% of all specimens were defined as harboring a relevant gene fusion (kinase fusions 1.8%). Novel configurations of BRAF, NTRK3, and RET gene fusions resulting from chromosomal translocations were identified. An R-spondin fusion was found in only one tumor (0.35%), much less than an earlier reported frequency of 10% in colorectal cancers. We also found a novel fusion involving USP9X-ERAS formed by chromothripsis and leading to high expression of ERAS, a constitutively active RAS protein normally expressed only in embryonic stem cells. This USP9X-ERAS fusion appeared highly oncogenic on the basis of its ability to activate AKT signaling. Oncogenic fusions were identified only in lymph node-negative tumors that lacked BRAF or KRAS mutations. In summary, we identified several novel oncogenic gene fusions in colorectal cancer that may drive malignant development and offer new targets for personalized therapy. Cancer Res; 77(14); 3814-22. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract 4129: Novel oncogenic BRAF fusions and impact on targeted therapies

Abstract BRAF mutations are driver events in a number of cancers including thyroid cancer and melanoma. The most common, BRAF V600E, alters normal BRAF protein activity in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway by constitutively activating BRAF and inducing proliferative signaling and tumor growth. Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting tumors with the V600E mutation have been evaluated in clinical trials and are now approved for melanoma. While BRAF missense mutations have been extensively characterized for oncogenic potential and actionability in genomically-guided therapy, BRAF gene fusions have been underappreciated for not only their functional role in cancer but also in differential drug response. More recently, data suggest that alternative approaches may be needed for treatment of patients with BRAF fusion-containing tumors. We have identified two novel BRAF fusions in tumors from patients with papillary thyroid cancer and melanoma. Both fusions result in an in-frame fusion of a novel gene partner at the 5’ end of the fusion, an intact BRAF kinase domain at the 3’ end, and loss of the BRAF auto-inhibitory domain. We hypothesized that these novel BRAF fusions act as oncogenic drivers, and the mechanism of BRAF activation differs from that caused by V600E mutations and may be fusion partner-specific. These fusions have been engineered in the laboratory and tested for tumorigenic potential and functional activity. BRAF fusion expression in non-transformed cells induces colony formation similar to the V600E mutation indicating tumorigenic potential. These BRAF fusions also constitutively activate the MAPK pathway in the absence of stimulation as demonstrated by phosphorylated ERK and MEK proteins. Additionally, BRAF fusion-expressing cells form tumors in vivo similarly to the BRAF V600E-expressing cells. These tumors are highly proliferative as demonstrated by strong Ki67 immunohistochemical staining and display MAPK pathway activation as evidenced by phosphorylated ERK. BRAF fusion-expressing cells have differential sensitivity to MAPK pathway inhibitors compared to cells with the V600E mutation as measured by reduced MAPK signaling. Inhibition of the MAPK pathway is relevant in targeting BRAF fusion-containing cells but may not follow the same paradigm as point mutations. Collectively, our data suggest that BRAF fusions are functional and represent novel therapeutic targets, but may need an alternative approach as compared to tumors with BRAF missense mutations. Citation Format: Sonia C. Dolfi, Ann Silk, Bhavna Paratala, Whitney Petrosky, Srilatha Simhadri, Atul Kulkarni, Shridar Ganesan, Kim M. Hirshfield. Novel oncogenic BRAF fusions and impact on targeted therapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4129. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4129

Engineering and Functional Characterization of Fusion Genes Identifies Novel Oncogenic Drivers of Cancer.

Oncogenic gene fusions drive many human cancers, but tools to more quickly unravel their functional contributions are needed. Here we describe methodology permitting fusion gene construction for functional evaluation. Using this strategy, we engineered the known fusion oncogenes, BCR-ABL1, EML4-ALK, and ETV6-NTRK3, as well as 20 previously uncharacterized fusion genes identified in The Cancer Genome Atlas datasets. In addition to confirming oncogenic activity of the known fusion oncogenes engineered by our construction strategy, we validated five novel fusion genes involving MET, NTRK2, and BRAF kinases that exhibited potent transforming activity and conferred sensitivity to FDA-approved kinase inhibitors. Our fusion construction strategy also enabled domain-function studies of BRAF fusion genes. Our results confirmed other reports that the transforming activity of BRAF fusions results from truncation-mediated loss of inhibitory domains within the N-terminus of the BRAF protein. BRAF mutations residing within this inhibitory region may provide a means for BRAF activation in cancer, therefore we leveraged the modular design of our fusion gene construction methodology to screen N-terminal domain mutations discovered in tumors that are wild-type at the BRAF mutation hotspot, V600. We identified an oncogenic mutation, F247L, whose expression robustly activated the MAPK pathway and sensitized cells to BRAF and MEK inhibitors. When applied broadly, these tools will facilitate rapid fusion gene construction for subsequent functional characterization and translation into personalized treatment strategies. Cancer Res; 77(13); 3502-12. ©2017 AACR.