Box And Block Test Research Articles

Comparison of virtual reality to physical box and blocks on cortical an neuromuscualar activations in young adults

The purpose of this study was to assess the changes in neural activations when performing the box and block test (BBT) in virtual reality (VR) compared to the physical BBT. Young healthy participants performed three trials of the BBT with their left and right hands in both the VR BBT, using VR hand controllers, and physical BBT conditions. Electromyography sensors were placed on the upper extremity of both arms and functional near-infrared spectroscopy was used to measure motor cortex activations throughout each condition. While a reduction in BBT score and increased wrist extensor neuromuscular activity is exhibited during the VR condition, there is no statistical difference in motor cortex activation between the two BBT conditions. This work provides a basis for exploring cortical and neuromuscular responses to VR in patient populations.

A Digital Box and Block Test for Hand Dexterity Measurement: Instrument Validation Study.

The Box and Block Test (BBT) measures unilateral gross manual dexterity and is widely used in clinical settings with a wide range of populations, including older people and clients with neurological disorders. In this study, we present a newly developed digitized version of the BBT, called the digital BBT (dBBT). The physical design is similar to the original BBT, but the dBBT contains digital electronics that automate the test procedure, timing, and score measurement. The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of the dBBT. We performed measurements at 2 time points for 29 healthy participants. BBT and dBBT were used at the first measurement time point, and dBBT was used again at the second measurement time point. Concurrent validity was assessed using the correlation between BBT and dBBT, the paired t test, and the Bland-Altman analysis. Test-retest reliability and interrater reliability were examined using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) by repeated measures with the dBBT within an interval of 10 days. Our results showed moderate concurrent validity (r=0.48, P=.008), moderate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.72, P<.001), a standard error of measurement of 3.1 blocks, and the smallest detectable change at a 95% CI of 8.5 blocks. Interrater reliability was moderate with an ICC of 0.67 (P=.02). The Bland-Altman analysis showed sufficient accuracy of the dBBT in comparison with the conventional BBT. The dBBT can contribute to objectifying the measurement of gross hand dexterity without losing its important characteristics and is simple to implement.

Asymmetric involvement of hands: Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Bimanual Fine Motor Function 2.0 classification in children with cerebral palsy

BackgroundManual functions affect more than a half of children with Cerebral palsy (CP). Asymmetric involvement of hands may also affect unilateral and bilateral activities of daily life. The Bimanual Fine Motor Function version 2.0 (BFMF-2.0) is a unique functional classification that categorizes the capacity of each hand (what the child can do) during bimanual functions. PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BFMF-2.0 in children with CP. Study DesignClinical measurement and cross-sectional study. MethodsThe study included 91 children with CP (56 girls, mean age; 7.41 ± 4.23 years [4–18 years]) and their parents. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), and the Box and Block Test (BBT) were used for construct and concurrent validity. Experienced/inexperienced therapists and parents classified fine motor capacities of the children via live or video-based observation to assess inter-rater reliability. Three weeks later, the children were reclassified for intra-rater reliability. ResultsThe Turkish version of the BFMF-2.0 classification was strongly correlated with the MACS (rho = −0.88, p < 0.001), the QUEST (rho = 0.80, p < 0.001), and the BBT (rho = −0.77, p < 0.001). The inter-rater reliability scores were weak to excellent between the parents and the therapists (via live observation, κw = 0.57) and also between experienced/inexperienced therapists (via live or video-based observation, κw = 0.66–0.79). Intra-rater reliability scores were good to excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC] = 0.87–0.95). ConclusionsThe Turkish version of the BFMF-2.0 classification is valid and reliable and could be applied by experienced and inexperienced therapists via live or video-based observation and by parents via live observation.

Effects of a multi-component virtual reality program on motor skills and functional postural control in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy

BackgroundPediatric neurorehabilitation has recently employed virtual reality (VR) technologies as a platform to design and implement novel modalities. AimsTo evaluate the feasibility of a multi-component VR-based program on motor skills and functional postural control for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP). MethodsA single-case-experimental design was conducted on eight children with HCP (12.33 ± 4.71 years and GMFCS= II, I). The VR-based program consisted of 3 sessions per week for four weeks. Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, Functional Reach Test (FRT), Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS), Activities Scale for Kids (ASK), ABILHAND-Kids, and Box and Block Test (BBT) were used to evaluate functional changes. Outcomes and resultsStatistical analysis showed that improvements in functional postural control were significant on at least one balance measure for seven out of eight participants during the intervention phase. For all participants, a significant increase was observed in the BBT scores. Before-after intervention analysis revealed statistically significant improvements in PBS (z = −2.52, p ≤ 0.01), ABILHAND-Kids (z = −2.25, p ≤ 0.01), and ASK (z = −2.38, p ≤ 0.01). Conclusions and implicationsThis study provided early evidence of the effectiveness of the multi-component VR-based program in children with HCP. However, future studies with randomized controlled trial design are needed to evaluate the long-term effects and compare them with conventional rehabilitation practice.

Investigation of the efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper-limb motor recovery in subacute ischemic stroke without cortical involvement: a protocol paper for a multi-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial.

The incidence of stroke is increasing steadily due to factors such as population aging. Approximately 80% of stroke survivors have motor disorders affecting their daily lives. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been reported to maximize functional recovery after stroke along with exercise intervention in upper limb rehabilitation treatment. However, whether rTMS affects the recovery of upper limb function in patients with stroke remains unclear. Therefore, in this trial, we will investigate the efficacy of low-frequency rTMS in patients with subcortical and brainstem ischemic stroke. This study has been designed as a multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of low-frequency rTMS over the contralesional M1 with sham stimulation. Overall, 88 participants will be allocated to the intervention or control group in a 1:1 ratio, with stratification according to their initial upper extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment (UE-FMA) score. The participants will receive either 30 min of real rTMS (intervention group) or sham rTMS (control group), followed by 30 min of occupational therapy for 10 consecutive workdays. All the participants will receive the same amount of rehabilitation therapy throughout the intervention period. Evaluations will be performed at baseline (T0), at the end of treatment (T1), and 4 weeks after the end of treatment (T2), including the box and block test (BBT), UE-FMA, Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index, and NIH Stroke Scale scores, Finger tapping test, Brunnstrom stage, modified Ashworth scale, and grip strength. The primary outcome will be the change in the BBT score between T0 and T2. This study will provide evidence on the efficacy of low-frequency rTMS in motor function recovery of the upper limb in patients with subacute, subcortical, and brainstem ischemic stroke. ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [NCT05535504].

Efficacy of interactive manual dexterity training after stroke: a pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of Dextrain Manipulandum™ training of dexterity components such as force control and independent finger movements, to dose-matched conventional therapy (CT) post-stroke.MethodsA prospective, single-blind, pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted. Chronic-phase post-stroke patients with mild-to-moderate dexterity impairment (Box and Block Test (BBT) > 1) received 12 sessions of Dextrain or CT. Blinded measures were obtained before and after training and at 3-months follow-up. Primary outcome was BBT-change (after–before training). Secondary outcomes included changes in motor impairments, activity limitations and dexterity components. Corticospinal excitability and short intracortical inhibition (SICI) were measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation.ResultsBBT-change after training did not differ between the Dextrain (N = 21) vs CT group (N = 21) (median [IQR] = 5[2–7] vs 4[2–7], respectively; P = 0.36). Gains in BBT were maintained at the 3-month post-training follow-up, with a non-significant trend for enhanced BBT-change in the Dextrain group (median [IQR] = 3[− 1–7.0], P = 0.06). Several secondary outcomes showed significantly larger changes in the Dextrain group: finger tracking precision (mean ± SD = 0.3 ± 0.3N vs − 0.1 ± 0.33N; P < 0.0018), independent finger movements (34.7 ± 25.1 ms vs 7.7 ± 18.5 ms, P = 0.02) and maximal finger tapping speed (8.4 ± 7.1 vs 4.5 ± 4.9, P = 0.045). At follow-up, Dextrain group showed significantly greater improvement in Motor Activity Log (median/IQR = 0.7/0.2–0.8 vs 0.2/0.1–0.6, P = 0.05). Across both groups SICI increased in patients with greater BBT-change (Rho = 0.80, P = 0.006). Comparing Dextrain subgroups with maximal grip force higher/lower than median (61.2%), BBT-change was significantly larger in patients with low vs high grip force (7.5 ± 5.6 vs 2.9 ± 2.8; respectively, P = 0.015).ConclusionsAlthough immediate improvements in gross dexterity post-stroke did not significantly differ between Dextrain training and CT, our findings suggest that Dextrain enhances recovery of several dexterity components and reported hand-use, particularly when motor impairment is moderate (low initial grip force). Findings need to be confirmed in a larger trial.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03934073 (retrospectively registered)

Distinguishing Distinct Neural Systems for Proximal vs Distal Upper Extremity Motor Control After Acute Stroke.

The classic and singular pattern of distal greater than proximal upper extremity motor deficits after acute stroke does not account for the distinct structural and functional organization of circuits for proximal and distal motor control in the healthy CNS. We hypothesized that separate proximal and distal upper extremity clinical syndromes after acute stroke could be distinguished and that patterns of neuroanatomical injury leading to these 2 syndromes would reflect their distinct organization in the intact CNS. Proximal and distal components of motor impairment (upper extremity Fugl-Meyer score) and strength (Shoulder Abduction Finger Extension score) were assessed in consecutively recruited patients within 7 days of acute stroke. Partial correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship between proximal and distal motor scores. Functional outcomes including the Box and Blocks Test (BBT), Barthel Index (BI), and modified Rankin scale (mRS) were examined in relation to proximal vs distal motor patterns of deficit. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping was used to identify regions of injury associated with proximal vs distal upper extremity motor deficits. A total of 141 consecutive patients (49% female) were assessed 4.0 ± 1.6 (mean ± SD) days after stroke onset. Separate proximal and distal upper extremity motor components were distinguishable after acute stroke (p = 0.002). A pattern of proximal more than distal injury (i.e., relatively preserved distal motor control) was not rare, observed in 23% of acute stroke patients. Patients with relatively preserved distal motor control, even after controlling for total extent of deficit, had better outcomes in the first week and at 90 days poststroke (BBT, ρ = 0.51, p < 0.001; BI, ρ = 0.41, p < 0.001; mRS, ρ = 0.38, p < 0.001). Deficits in proximal motor control were associated with widespread injury to subcortical white and gray matter, while deficits in distal motor control were associated with injury restricted to the posterior aspect of the precentral gyrus, consistent with the organization of proximal vs distal neural circuits in the healthy CNS. These results highlight that proximal and distal upper extremity motor systems can be selectively injured by acute stroke, with dissociable deficits and functional consequences. Our findings emphasize how disruption of distinct motor systems can contribute to separable components of poststroke upper extremity hemiparesis.

A computer-vision based hand rehabilitation assessment suite

Post-stroke patients very commonly present upper limb deficits, while their rehabilitation comprises regular monitoring and kinematic assessments to evaluate motor recovery. The Box and Block Test (BBT), as well as the Sollerman Hand function Test (SHT), are two of the most used and recommended tools to objectively measure upper limb dexterity, in addition to evaluating the rehabilitation of fine motor skills in patients. However, the tests themselves require the use of very specific equipment, along with the physical attendance of a therapist, making the whole procedure time consuming and clinic dependent. This paper proposes a computer vision hand rehabilitation assessment suite, which stands as a virtual alternative to the real-world scenarios. Our application integrates all the original tests’ guidelines and procedures into an interactive computer vision experience that utilizes bleeding edge technologies such as MediaPipe Hands for hand and finger tracking. This innovative tool requires neither any additional computer peripherals (smart gloves, VR headsets) nor any kind of extra physical equipment (wooden box, blocks), but works instead with just a mid-range PC and a camera. Our system can be deployed in residential spaces via modern 5G/6G or FTTx networks, and the test results can be sent remotely to any physician or rehabilitation expert. Finally, we shortly discuss some technical issues of our approach, as well as present some future directions regarding our tool’s score normalization and feature expansion.

Effect of task-based bilateral arm training on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveUpper limb recovery is a crucial component of stroke rehabilitation aimed to maximize functional activities and reduce disability. Using both arms post stroke is essential to carry out many functional activities but the evidence on bilateral arm training (BAT) is understudied. To investigate the evidence for efficacy of task-based BAT on upper limb recovery, function, and participation post stroke. MethodsWe included 13 randomized controlled trials, and methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tool and the PEDro scale. The outcome measures such as Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), Box and Block Test (BBT), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) were synthesized and analysed based on ICF. ResultsWhen comparing BAT with control group, BAT showed improvement in the pooled standard mean difference (SMD) of FMA-UE (SMD= 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.12 to 1.12, p = 0.01; I2=83%). The control group showed significant improvement in MAL-QOM (SMD= -0.10, 95%CI, -0.77 to 0.58, p = 0.78; I2=89%). Compared to conventional group, BAT showed a significant improvement in BBT (SMD= 0.52, 95%CI, 0.04 to 1.00, p = 0.03; I2=0%). When compared with BAT, unimanual training yielded a significant improvement (SMD= -0.60, 95%CI, -0.98 to -0.22, p = 0.002; I2=0%) in MAL-QOM. In real-life participation, the control group showed improvement in SIS (SMD= -0.17, 95% (CI), -0.70 to 0.37, p = 0.54; I2=48%) over BAT. ConclusionsTask-based BAT appears to improve upper limb motor function post stroke. The benefits of task-based BAT on activity performance and participation in real life are not statistically significant.

The Benefits of Combining Mixed Virtual Reality Exergaming with Occupational Therapy for Upper Extremity Dexterity

Virtual Reality (VR) is expanding worldwide in education, training, gaming, and healthcare to achieve distinct outcomes. This paper aimed to identify to what extent physiotherapy based on mixed VR technology and occupational therapy serves the functionality of healthy subjects’ upper extremities; it also analyzed the benefits of this protocol for therapy guidelines in hand dexterity re-habilitation. Fifteen VR exergames and occupational therapy sessions were performed for 60 min in three weeks with a sample of sixteen people. The Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test Scale (JTHFTS), Nine-Hole Peg test (9 Hole), Box and Blocks Test (BBT), and Timed Functional Test for the Arm and Shoulder (TFAST) were used for pre and post-therapy assessment. Linear regression was used to identify healthy subjects’ main tasks, predicting upper extremity dexterity. The results of pre- and post-exercise assessments suggested significant improvements for both upper extremities, dominant and non-dominant. BBT, the nine-hole peg test, and FAST showed significant differences in pre- and post-therapy, favoring prophylactical exercises. Hence, in the linear regression results for the dominant hand, five models emerged as potential predictors for upper extremity agility. The capacity to pick up large light objects seemed to bring the most critical influence on hand dexterity. However, regarding the non-dominant hand, the results suggested that writing ability was the most potent predictor of dexterity. In this respect, the protocol used in this research can be used as a guideline for further upper extremity dexterity training since VR exergames combined with occupational therapy can bring essential contributions to upper limb proprioception and dexterity functioning.

Independence and upper extremity functioning after spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study

Upper extremity functioning is important for achieving independence in activities of daily living (ADL). A better understanding of relationships between different aspects of independence in ADL after spinal cord injury (SCI) and upper extremity functioning is required to guide rehabilitation practices. To determine which aspects of independence in ADL are correlated with upper extremity functioning in individuals with cervical or thoracic SCI. A total of 25 adults (mean age 58.4 years, 72% men) with established cervical or thoracic SCI were recruited. Independence in ADL was assessed by Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-III) and upper extremity functioning by kinematic measures (movement time, smoothness, and wrist angle during drinking task), grip strength, Upper Extremity Motor and Sensory Score, Box and Block Test (BBT), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Upper Extremity Basic Data Set (ISCI-Hand and ISCI-Shoulder). Spearman correlation coefficients were used for data analyses. The SCIM-self-care subscale, particularly the feeding and dressing items, correlated moderately (r ≥ 0.5) with movement time and smoothness, grip strength, ARAT, BBT, and ISCI-Hand. The SCIM-respiration/sphincter subscale and the SCIM-mobility showed very low and low correlations with upper extremity assessments. However, at item level, respiration and bed/wheelchair mobility showed moderate correlations. Independence in self-care as domain and feeding/dressing, respiration and bed/wheelchair mobility as separate items were dependent on upper extremity functioning in individuals with cervical or thoracic SCI. Movement time and smoothness along with BBT, grip strength, ARAT, and ISCI-Hand can be used as indicators of independence in ADL. These findings can provide guidance to clinical practice in selection of upper extremity assessments in the context for ADL in individuals with SCI.

Transcutaneous Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined with Robotic Exoskeleton Rehabilitation for the Upper Limbs in Subjects with Cervical SCI: Clinical Trial.

(1) Background: Restoring arm and hand function is a priority for individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) for independence and quality of life. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) promotes the upper extremity (UE) motor function when applied at the cervical region. The aim of the study was to determine the effects of cervical tSCS, combined with an exoskeleton, on motor strength and functionality of UE in subjects with cSCI. (2) Methods: twenty-two subjects participated in the randomized mix of parallel-group and crossover clinical trial, consisting of an intervention group (n = 15; tSCS exoskeleton) and a control group (n = 14; exoskeleton). The assessment was carried out at baseline, after the last session, and two weeks after the last session. We assessed graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility, and prehension (GRASSP), box and block test (BBT), spinal cord independence measure III (SCIM-III), maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), ASIA impairment scale (AIS), and WhoQol-Bref; (3) Results: GRASSP, BBT, SCIM III, cylindrical grip force and AIS motor score showed significant improvement in both groups (p ≤ 0.05), however, it was significantly higher in the intervention group than the control group for GRASSP strength, and GRASSP prehension ability (p ≤ 0.05); (4) Conclusion: our findings show potential advantages of the combination of cervical tSCS with an exoskeleton to optimize the outcome for UE.

Automatic Cube Counting System for the Box and Blocks Test Using Proximity Sensors: Development and Validation

The Box and Blocks Test (BBT) is a widely used outcome measure for manual dexterity assessments in neurological rehabilitation. The BBT score is based on the maximum number of cubes that a person is able to displace during a 60s time window. In this paper, a low-cost instrumented system to automatically obtain the number of cubes using proximity sensors is presented. For that purpose, the central partition of the BBT was sensorized, aiming to minimise the employed sensors and minimally alter the physical BBT box. The counting system, connected to the mobile app, allows for the self-administration of the test as users only need to follow the presented instructions. Firstly, the methodology used to automate the test scoring is presented, including the sensors’ description and the prototype design. Then, the obtained success rate in cube counting is shown, with an average of 98% in trials with five healthy users. Finally, the conclusions and future work are shown. The results support the use of automated methods for upper limb assessment, providing more objective results and additional information about user performance.

Action Observation Therapy for Arm Recovery after Stroke: A Preliminary Investigation on a Novel Protocol with EEG Monitoring

This preliminary study introduces a novel action observation therapy (AOT) protocol associated with electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring to be used in the future as a rehabilitation strategy for the upper limb in patients with subacute stroke. To provide initial evidence on the usefulness of this method, we compared the outcome of 11 patients who received daily AOT for three weeks with that of patients who undertook two other approaches recently investigated by our group, namely intensive conventional therapy (ICT), and robot-assisted therapy combined with functional electrical stimulation (RAT-FES). The three rehabilitative interventions showed similar arm motor recovery as indexed by Fugl-Meyer's assessment of the upper extremity (FMA_UE) and box and block test (BBT). The improvement in the FMA_UE was yet more favourable in patients with mild/moderate motor impairments who received AOT, in contrast with patients carrying similar disabilities who received the other two treatments. This suggests that AOT might be more effective in this subgroup of patients, perhaps because the integrity of their mirror neurons system (MNS) was more preserved, as indexed by EEG recording from central electrodes during action observation. In conclusion, AOT may reveal an effective rehabilitative tool in patients with subacute stroke; the EEG evaluation of MNS integrity may help to select patients who could maximally benefit from this intervention.

Perception of effort and the allocation of physical resources: A generalization to upper-limb motor tasks.

The perception of effort (PE) is widely used to prescribe and monitor exercise during locomotor and resistance tasks. The present study examines the validity of PE to prescribe and monitor exercise during upper-limb motor tasks under various loads and speed requirements. Forty participants volunteered in two experiments. In experiment 1, we used four PE intensities to prescribe exercise on a modified version of the box and block test (BBT) and a pointing task. We investigated the possibility of monitoring the exercise intensity by tracking changes in PE rating in response to three different tempos or additional weights. Experiment 2 replicated the possibility of prescribing the exercise with the PE intensity during the BBT and explored the impact of additional weights on performance and PE during the standardized version of the BBT. Muscle activation, heart rate, and respiratory frequencies were recorded. In experiment 1, increasing the PE intensity to prescribe exercise induced an increased performance between each intensity. Increasing task difficulty with faster movement tempo and adding weight on the forearm increased the rating of PE. Experiment 2 replicated the possibility to use PE intensity for exercise prescription during the BBT. When completing the BBT with an additional weight on the forearm, participants maintained performance at the cost of a higher PE. In both experiments, changes in PE were associated with changes in muscle activation. Our results suggest that PE is a valid tool to prescribe and monitor exercise during upper-limb motor tasks.

Is mirror therapy combined with a routine physiotherapy protocol effective for children with obstetrical upper brachial plexus palsy?

Study designRandomized controlled study. IntroductionMirror therapy is a rehabilitation strategy based on the repeated use of the mirror illusion and also one of the treatment choice of brachial plexus injuries. PurposeWe aimed to determine the effects of mirror therapy combined with a routine rehabilitation program on upper limb motor function in children with obstetric brachial plexus injury. MethodsTwenty children with obstetric brachial palsy were included in this study. They were randomly allocated to either control (n = 10) or mirror therapy (n = 10) group. The following clinical tools were used to assess the upper extremity function: Active Movement Scale (AMS), Modified Mallet Scale (MMS), Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Test, Finger Grip Strength (FGSM) Test, Box and Block Test (BBT), Nine Hole Peg Test (9-HPT), and goniometric measurement. Both groups received the same routine physiotherapy program for 8 weeks. The study group underwent mirror therapy in addition to the rehabilitation program. ResultsThe mean age of the study population was 11.35 ± 4.12 years. There was no change in the goniometric values, AMS and MMS scores after the treatment in both groups (p > 0.05), except for the improvement of the wrist extension in the study group (p < 0.05). There was an increase in both HGS and FGS scores in the study group. Only FGS scores improved in the control group after the intervention (p < 0.05). 9-HPT and BBT scores improved in both groups (p < 0.05). All other parameters tested were comparable between the two groups after the treatment. ConclusionsThe results of this study did not show any additional benefits of mirror therapy combined with a rehabilitation protocol compared to routine physiotherapy treatment, but was not adequately powered to do so.

Brain-computer interface combined with mental practice and occupational therapy enhances upper limb motor recovery, activities of daily living, and participation in subacute stroke.

We investigated the effects of brain-computer interface (BCI) combined with mental practice (MP) and occupational therapy (OT) on performance in activities of daily living (ADL) in stroke survivors. Participants were randomized into two groups: experimental (n = 23, BCI controlling a hand exoskeleton combined with MP and OT) and control (n = 21, OT). Subjects were assessed with the functional independence measure (FIM), motor activity log (MAL), amount of use (MAL-AOM), and quality of movement (MAL-QOM). The box and blocks test (BBT) and the Jebsen hand functional test (JHFT) were used for the primary outcome of performance in ADL, while the Fugl-Meyer Assessment was used for the secondary outcome. Exoskeleton activation and the degree of motor imagery (measured as event-related desynchronization) were assessed in the experimental group. For the BCI, the EEG electrodes were placed on the regions of FC3, C3, CP3, FC4, C4, and CP4, according to the international 10-20 EEG system. The exoskeleton was placed on the affected hand. MP was based on functional tasks. OT consisted of ADL training, muscle mobilization, reaching tasks, manipulation and prehension, mirror therapy, and high-frequency therapeutic vibration. The protocol lasted 1 h, five times a week, for 2 weeks. There was a difference between baseline and post-intervention analysis for the experimental group in all evaluations: FIM (p = 0.001, d = 0.56), MAL-AOM (p = 0.001, d = 0.83), MAL-QOM (p = 0.006, d = 0.84), BBT (p = 0.004, d = 0.40), and JHFT (p = 0.001, d = 0.45). Within the experimental group, post-intervention improvements were detected in the degree of motor imagery (p < 0.001) and the amount of exoskeleton activations (p < 0.001). For the control group, differences were detected for MAL-AOM (p = 0.001, d = 0.72), MAL-QOM (p = 0.013, d = 0.50), and BBT (p = 0.005, d = 0.23). Notably, the effect sizes were larger for the experimental group. No differences were detected between groups at post-intervention. BCI combined with MP and OT is a promising tool for promoting sensorimotor recovery of the upper limb and functional independence in subacute post-stroke survivors.

Trajectories of arm recovery early after stroke: an exploratory study using latent class growth analysis

Aim To investigate trajectories of recovery of motor arm function after stroke during inpatient rehabilitation. Materials and methods Data were available from 74 consecutively-admitted stroke survivors receiving inpatient rehabilitation from an inception cohort study. Heterogeneity of arm recovery in the first 4-weeks was investigated using latent class analysis and weekly Box and Block Test (BBT) scores. Optimal number of clusters were determined; characterised and cluster associated factors explored. Results A 4-cluster model was identified, including 19 participants with low baseline arm function and minimal recovery (‘LOWstart/LOWprogress’, 26%), 15 with moderate function and low recovery (‘MODstart/LOWprogress’, 20%), 15 with low function and high recovery (‘LOWstart/HIGHprogress’, 20%), and 25 with moderate function and recovery (‘MODstart/MODprogress’, 34%). Compared to LOWstart/LOWprogress: LOWstart/HIGHprogress presented earlier post-stroke (β, 95%CI) (−4.81 days, −8.94 to −0.69); MODstart/MODprogress had lower modified Rankin Scale scores (−0.74, −1.15 to −0.32); and MODstart/LOWprogress, LOWstart/HIGHprogress and MODstart/MODprogress had higher admission BBT (23.58, 18.82 to 28.34; 4.85, 0.85 to 9.61; 28.02, 23.82 to 32.21), Upper Limb-Motor Assessment Scale (9.60, 7.24 to 11.97; 3.34, 0.97 to 5.70; 10.86, 8.77 to 12.94), Action Research Arm Test (31.09, 22.86 to 39.33; 12.69, 4.46 to 20.93; 38.01, 30.76 to 45.27), and Manual Muscle Test scores (10.64, 7.07 to 14.21; 6.24, 2.67 to 9.81; 11.87, 8.72 to 15.01). Conclusions We found unique patterns of arm recovery with distinct characteristics for each cluster. Better understanding of patterns of arm recovery can guide future models and intervention development. KEY MESSAGES Arm recovery early after stroke follows four distinct trajectories that relate to time post stroke, initial stroke severity and baseline level of motor arm function. Identification of recovery patterns gives insight into the uniqueness of individual’s recovery. This study offers a novel approach on which to build and develop future models of arm recovery.

The Effects of Virtual Reality Mirror Therapy on Movement-Related Cortical Potentials and Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients

The purpose of this study lies in finding out of the effects of virtual reality mirror therapy (VRMT) on excitability of the cerebral cortex and upper extremity function in stroke patients. The subjects were diagnosed as stroke according to criteria to select the research targets. The experimental group (n=12) was applied on general physical therapy included VRMT for 5 times per week in 6 weeks. Bereitschafts potential (BP) and motor potential (MP) of movement-related cortical potential (MRCPs) was applied for evaluation of excitability of the cerebral cortex, the upper extremity function of experimental group was assessed using Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), box and block test (BBT). Results were measured at periods of pre-intervention, post-intervention. The BP mean amplitude showed statistically significant decrease. The MP peak amplitude showed statistically significant increase except for C4. FMA, BBT score showed statistically significant increase. These results were show that VRMT increase excitability of the cerebral cortex and upper extremity function. Accordingly, VRMT would usefully be applicable treatment to improve upper extremity functional recovery in the stroke patients.

What Is the Relationship between Trunk Control Function and Arm Coordination in Adults with Severe-to-Moderate Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy?

Adults with tetraparesis cerebral palsy (i.e., wheelchair users) tend to experience more accelerated ageing, resulting in physical deterioration that increases the impact of the disability, leading to a loss of mobility that interferes with people's daily activities and participation in the community. The aim of this work is to study the relationship between trunk control and the function of the less-affected arm in this population. For this purpose, 41 para-athletes were invited to participate in this study, performing five tests to assess upper limb coordination, two tests to assess manual dexterity [i.e., Box and Block Test (BBT) and Box and Ball Test (BBLT)] and three tests to assess intra-limb coordination in different planes. Trunk control was assessed in both static and dynamic sitting conditions. The results show moderate correlations between static postural control and manual dexterity tests in the BBT (r = -0.553; p = 0.002) and BBLT (r = -0.537; p = 0.004). Large correlations were also found between static postural control and intra-limb tasks in horizontal (r = 0.769; p = 0.001) and vertical movements (r = 0.739; p = 0.009). Better static trunk control is related to a better upper limb function in the sagittal plane. Considerations and implications are explained in the manuscript.