and Realistic Codes In general, the more restricted the artistic style, the narrower the range of vocabulary and the more simple and rigid the syntactical rules. For example, consider color as a basic unit of artistic 191 This content downloaded from 157.55.39.112 on Wed, 07 Sep 2016 04:53:27 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 192 Sociological Theory vocabulary. A painting in a more restricted style would be composed of a narrower range of colors, with less variation in hue and intensity and less mixing of colors. In effect, all the options of using color would be restrained, limited, or restricted. Similarly, the application of paint, itself a syntactical device, would be simplified. Brushstrokes as a means of expressive communication would be reduced or removed, and in extreme cases the human hand could be eliminated altogether, being replaced by mechanical techniques such as silk-screening or by collage, in which found objects replace images drawn by the artist. In general, the more vocabulary is reduced and the more syntax is simplified, the more abstract the art. This is almost of necessity. A narrower range of artistic materials makes it difficult to accurately replicate a realistic image. Thus abstract art tends to be a more restricted code, and conversely realism tends to be a more elaborated code. By definition, realism spells things out in full, and it therefore requires a full range of color, shape, form, line, and so on to realistically reproduce an image. It is simply difficult to paint anything very realistically with just a few abstract gestures. Linguistically, realism contains more of its meaning within its own internal structure than does abstraction, which is a more context-dependent form of communication. For instance, a realist painting of a bowl of fruit is just what it appears to be, as opposed to, say, an abstract expressionist painting, which in principle could be mistaken for spilled paint or a child's scribbles. Without mastering the skills of drawing and painting-that is, without utilizing the vocabulary and syntax of art-one could not paint a realist portrait or seascape. But one could drip paint on a canvas a laJackson Pollock or dabble pigment in expressive gestures like any other abstract expressionist. I am not speaking of esthetic quality but simply of whether some paint is defined as art or as a mistake or child's play. As a general rule, the more minimal and abstract the painting, the more alternative interpretations become possible. Is a drip of paint a drip of paint or art? This may seem trivial, but it must be remembered that much of the minimal and conceptual art of the 1960s involved art objects that were stacks of railroad ties, mounds of dirt, pieces of cloth, piles of scrap metal, or assorted found objects stacked, piled, or flung on museum floors. These art objects readily lent themselves to being defined as something other This content downloaded from 157.55.39.112 on Wed, 07 Sep 2016 04:53:27 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms The Semantic Equation than art, if they were not encased in supplemental art theorizing that gave them their distinctly artistic significance. The important theoretical point is that in and of itself a drip of paint cannot signify its appropriate classification. It does not contain enough internal meaning to denote its status, as it does not employ enough variation in vocabulary and syntax to internally generate context-free meaning the way, say, the painted vase of flowers can. At least that is a painting. Whether it is good or bad is a moral evaluation, which is secondary to its factual classification as art. This importance of context, not only for interpreting art but, more fundamentally, for the very definition of art, suggests a theoretical connection between restricted codes and more solidary groups. Art, like all languages, not only appears in a social context but is a part of that very context. A restricted code is filled in and decoded by the commonly held assumptions of the group. More important, an intelligible restricted code, in speech or art, could not appear without assumptions provided by the broader group