Bowel Screening Research Articles

Emotional Barriers to Bowel Screening in Italy: Scale psychometric properties and effects on screening attendance.

To assess a three-factor version of the Emotional Barriers to Bowel Screening (EBBS) scale; analyze the scale's psychometric properties; and investigate the associations of fecal disgust, embarrassment, and fear with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening avoidance. Retrospective design: We asked participants to rate negative emotions associated with CRC screenings as well as whether they had ever attended a fecal occult blood test. 268 Italian adults aged 45-74 years. negative emotions, screening knowledge, CRC risk perception, demographic and background data, and hypothetical medical help-seeking. Confirmatory factor analyses, correlations, logistic regressions. The EBBS scale is a multidimensional instrument and, at least where fecal tests are of interest, can be used without the insertion disgust subscale. The analyzed negative emotions were negatively correlated with screening attendance and positively correlated with intention to delay seeking medical help. However, logistic regression models showed that, of the three analyzed emotions, fear about outcome was the only significant predictor of screening behavior and delaying medical care. Further studies can adopt the version of the EBBS scale that is most suitable for their research contexts. Interventions must be designed to reassure patients.

O53 Faecal immunochemical testing: cost effective way stratifying symptomatic patients for urgent straight to test investigation

Abstract Introduction Quantitative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) offers the opportunity to stratify symptomatic ‘high risk’ colorectal patients for further investigation. Method FIT was introduced in primary care to stratify ‘high risk’ symptomatic patients aged 60 years and above with a change in bowel habit to determine whether an urgent straight to test (STT) CT colonography (CTC) was indicated. All FIT tests were analysed in a national bowel screening hub using the OC-Sensor platform. A result of ≥ 4 μgHb/gFaeces, was used as the cut-off. All FIT results were cross referenced with a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer registry to determine the colorectal cancer detection rate (CRC). Data was analysed from February 2018-December 2019. Result The mean number of total CTC performed per month pre-FIT was 240 (range 185–278) and reduced to 217 (range 183–264) post-implementation (P < 0.05). The number referred under the STT pathway was 167 (range 119–209) reducing to 131 (range 91–153) (P < 0.05), however there was a corresponding rise in the number of non-STT referrals from outpatients 73 (range 44–105) to 85 (range 60–111) (P < 0.05). Conclusion FIT has the potential to reduce the burden on secondary care investigations to exclude bowel cancer. Our experience has shown that a conservative FIT level of < 4ug/ml has reduced numbers of STT referrals by 22%. Take-home Message FIT can be used for symptomatic patients with a change in bowel habits to stratify the need for further investigations. Post-implementation, FIT has reduced STT referral rates and reduced the burden placed on secondary care.

COVID-19 and cancer screening in Scotland: A national and coordinated approach to minimising harm

Screening is an important component of cancer control internationally. In Scotland, the National Health Service Scotland provides screening programmes for cervical, bowel and breast cancers. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the suspension of these programmes in March 2020. We describe the integrated approach to managing the impact of the pandemic on cancer screening programmes in Scotland throughout 2020. We outline the policy context and decision-making process leading to suspension, and the criteria and framework informing the subsequent, staggered, restart in subsequent months.The decision to suspend screening services in order to protect screening invitees and staff, and manage NHS capacity, was made after review of numbers of screening participants likely to be affected, and the potential number of delayed cancer diagnoses. Restart principles and a detailed route map plan were developed for each programme, seeking to ensure broad consistency of approach across the programmes and nationally. Early data indicates bowel, breast and cervical screening participation has increased since restart. Primary care has had to adapt to new infection prevention control measures for delivery of cervical screening. Cancer charities provided cancer intelligence and policy briefs to national bodies and Scottish Government, as well as supporting the public, patients and screening invitees through information and awareness campaigns.Emerging from the pandemic, there is recognition of the need and the opportunity to transform and renew both cancer and screening services in Scotland, and in particular to address long-standing workforce capacity problems through innovation and investment, and to continue to prioritise addressing health inequalities.

Bowel health and screening: evaluating a peer-led educational intervention for people with learning disabilities

Bowel health and screening: evaluating a peer-led educational intervention for people with learning disabilities

A 10-Year Evaluation of Short-Term Outcomes After Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Surgery: a Dutch Population-Based Study

BackgroundSynchronous colorectal cancer (CRC) has been associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality rates compared to solitary CRC. The influence of improved CRC care and introduction of screening on these outcomes remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate time trends in incidence, population characteristics, and short-term outcomes of synchronous CRC patients at the population level over a 10-year time period. MethodsData of all patients that underwent resection for primary CRC were extracted from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (2010–2019). Analyses were stratified for solitary and synchronous colon and rectal cancer. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with pathological and surgical outcomes. ResultsAmong 100,474 patients, 3.1% underwent surgery for synchronous CRC. A screening-related decrease for surgically treated left-sided solitary and synchronous colon cancer and a temporary increase for exclusively right-sided colon cancer were observed. Synchronous CRC patients had higher rates of complicated postoperative course, failure to rescue, and mortality. Bilateral synchronous colon cancer was more often treated with subtotal colectomy (25.4%) and demonstrated higher rates of surgical complications, reinterventions, prolonged hospital stay, and mortality than other synchronous tumor locations. DiscussionNational bowel screening resulted in contradictory effects on surgical resections for synchronous CRCs depending on sidedness. Bilateral synchronous colon cancer required more often extended resection resulting in significantly worse outcomes than other synchronous tumor locations. Identification of low volume, high complex CRC subpopulations is relevant for individualized care and has implications for case-mix correction and benchmarking in clinical auditing.

The inflammatory microenvironment in screen-detected premaligant adenomatous polyps: early results from the integrated technologies for improved polyp surveillance (INCISE) project.

Around 40% of patients who attend colonoscopy following a positive stool screening test have adenomatous polyps. Identifying which patients have a higher propensity for malignant transformation is currently poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the type and intensity of inflammatory infiltrate differ between screen-detected adenomas with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and low-grade dysplasia (LGD). A representative sample of 207 polyps from 134 individuals were included from a database of all patients with adenomas detected through the first round of the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (April 2009-April 2011). Inflammatory cell phenotype infiltrate was assessed by immunohistochemistry for CD3+, CD8+, CD45+ and CD68+ in a semi-quantitative manner at 20× resolution. Immune-cell infiltrate was graded as absent, weak, moderate or strong. Patient and polyp characteristics and inflammatory infiltrate were then compared between HGD and LGD polyps. CD3+ infiltrate was significantly higher in HGD polyps compared to LGD polyps (74 vs. 69%; P < 0.05). CD8+ infiltrate was significantly higher in HGD polyps compared to LGD polyps (36 vs. 13%; P < 0.001) whereas CD45+ infiltrate was not significantly different (69 vs. 64%; P = 0.401). There was no significant difference in CD68+ infiltrate (P = 0.540) or total inflammatory cell infiltrate (calculated from CD3+ and CD68+) (P = 0.226). This study reports an increase in CD3+ and CD8+ infiltrate in HGD colonic adenomas when compared to LGD adenomas. It may therefore have a use in the prognostic stratification and treatment of dysplastic polyps.

Development and user-testing of a brief decision aid for aspirin as a preventive approach alongside colorectal cancer screening

BackgroundSeveral epidemiological and cohort studies suggest that regular low-dose aspirin use independently reduces the long-term incidence and risk of colorectal cancer deaths by approximately 20%. However, there are also risks to aspirin use, mainly gastrointestinal bleeding and haemorrhagic stroke. Making informed decisions depends on the ability to understand and weigh up benefits and risks of available options. A decision aid to support people to consider aspirin therapy alongside participation in the NHS bowel cancer screening programme may have an additional impact on colorectal cancer prevention. This study aims to develop and user-test a brief decision aid about aspirin to enable informed decision-making for colorectal screening-eligible members of the public.MethodsWe undertook a qualitative study to develop an aspirin decision aid leaflet to support bowel screening responders in deciding whether to take aspirin to reduce their risk of colorectal cancer. The iterative development process involved two focus groups with public members aged 60–74 years (n = 14) and interviews with clinicians (n = 10). Interviews (n = 11) were used to evaluate its utility for decision-making. Analysis was conducted using a framework approach.ResultsOverall, participants found the decision aid acceptable and useful to facilitate decision-making. They expressed a need for individualised risk information, more detail about the potential risks of aspirin, and preferred risk information presented in pictograms when offered different options. Implementation pathways were discussed, including the possibility of involving different clinicians in the process such as GPs and/or community pharmacists. A range of potentially effective timepoints for sending out the decision aid were identified.ConclusionAn acceptable and usable decision aid was developed to support decisions about aspirin use to prevent colorectal cancer.

Enhancing the identification of anal incontinence in women of reproductive age

Anal incontinence is an unpredictable and debilitating condition that can significantly reduce quality of life. Symptoms include the involuntary loss of solid and/or liquid stool, flatus incontinence and rectal urgency. Pregnancy and childbirth are two major factors that increase the risk of anal incontinence in women of reproductive age. Women at high risk of anal incontinence include those with a known history of the condition and those who have experienced severe perineal trauma, particularly after injury to the anal sphincters (third-degree and fourth-degree tears). Routine screening for anal incontinence of women in high-risk groups during pregnancy and after childbirth appears to be limited in clinical practice. This article discusses the potential benefits of screening for anal incontinence, outlines the factors that inhibit and enable screening, describes current bowel screening tools and their limitations, and explores how the identification of anal incontinence in women of reproductive age could be improved.

Healthy lifestyles, genetic modifiers, and colorectal cancer risk: a prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank

Both genetic and lifestyle factors play an etiologic role in colorectal cancer (CRC). We evaluated potential gene-environment interactions in CRC risk. We used data from 346,297 participants in the UK Biobank cohort. Healthy lifestyle scores (HLSs) were constructed using 8 lifestyle factors, primarily according to the American Cancer Society guidelines, and were categorized into unhealthy, intermediate, and healthy groups. A polygenic risk score (PRS) was created using 95 genetic risk variants identified by genome-wide association studies of CRC and was categorized by tertile. Cox models were used to estimate the HRs and 95% CIs of CRC risk associated with the HLS and PRS. During a median follow-up of 5.8 y, 2066 incident cases of CRC were identified. Healthier HLSs were associated with reduced risk of CRC in a dose-response manner. The risk reduction was more apparent among those with high PRS (HRhealthy vs. unhealthy HLS1: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.79 for men and 0.71; 0.58, 0.85 for men and women combined) than those with low PRS. Although no multiplicative interactions were identified, the HLS1 and PRS showed a significant additive interaction (P=0.02 for all participants combined, 0.04 for men). In analyses including all participants, the adjusted CRC cumulative risk from age 40 to 75 y was 6.40% for those with high PRS/unhealthy HLS1, with a relative excess risk due to interaction of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.06, 1.10), compared with 2.09% among those with low PRS/healthy HLS1. This pattern was more apparent among those who reported not having received any bowel screening before baseline. Although the observational nature of the study precludes proof of causality, our findings suggest that individuals with a high genetic susceptibility could benefit more substantially than those with a low genetic risk from lifestyle modification in reducing CRC risk.

Barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria: A qualitative study.

Issue addressedPopulation cancer screening rates are around 50% for the general population and even lower in rural areas. This study aimed to explore knowledge, attitudes, behaviours, motivators and barriers to breast, bowel and cervical screening participation in under‐screened men and women.MethodsWe used a qualitative research design. Focus groups were segmented by age, sex and screening participation. Participants were under‐screened in at least one of the cancer screening programs, with separate groups for each of the programs. The discussion guides were designed around the Health Belief Model and group discussions were coded using a thematic content analysis approach.ResultsFourteen focus groups were held with 80 participants. Key themes were that the concept of cancer screening was not well understood, a low priority for preventive health behaviours, issues relating to local general practitioners (GP) and screening was unpleasant, embarrassing and/or inconvenient. A key determinant of participation in cancer screening was exposure to prompts to action, and it was evident that participants often required multiple prompts before they took action.ConclusionsOpportunities that develop attitudes to health that place disease prevention as a high priority; improve understanding of the benefit of screening in terms of early detection and treatment; improve GP availability and the patient‐practitioner relationship; and the development of messages for each of the screening programs should be further explored as factors that may influence rural population screening rates.So what?Addressing health attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, health practitioner and test‐related barriers and improving messaging may increase cancer screening participation in under‐screened rural populations.

Ethnic inequalities in older adults bowel cancer awareness: findings from a community survey conducted in an ethnically diverse region in England

BackgroundTo date, research exploring the public’s awareness of bowel cancer has taken place with predominantly white populations. To enhance our understanding of how bowel cancer awareness varies between ethnic groups, and inform the development of targeted interventions, we conducted a questionnaire study across three ethnically diverse regions in Greater London, England.MethodsData were collected using an adapted version of the bowel cancer awareness measure. Eligible adults were individuals, aged 60+ years, who were eligible for screening. Participants were recruited and surveyed, verbally, by staff working at 40 community pharmacies in Northwest London, the Harrow Somali association, and St. Mark’s Bowel Cancer Screening Centre. Associations between risk factor, symptom and screening awareness scores and ethnicity were assessed using multivariate regression.Results1013 adults, aged 60+ years, completed the questionnaire; half were of a Black, Asian or Minority ethnic group background (n = 507; 50.0%). Participants recognised a mean average of 4.27 of 9 symptoms and 3.99 of 10 risk factors. Symptom awareness was significantly lower among all ethnic minority groups (all p’s < 0.05), while risk factor awareness was lower for Afro-Caribbean and Somali adults, specifically (both p’s < 0.05). One in three adults (n = 722; 29.7%) did not know there is a Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Bowel screening awareness was particularly low among Afro-Caribbean and Somali adults (both p’s < 0.05).ConclusionAwareness of bowel cancer symptoms, risk factors and screening varies by ethnicity. Interventions should be targeted towards specific groups for whom awareness of screening and risk factors is low.

Knowledge and experience of cancer prevention and screening among Gypsies, Roma and Travellers: a participatory qualitative study

BackgroundThe incidence of cancer is increasing worldwide, which has led to greater public health focus on primary prevention. Ethnic minorities have lower awareness of cancer risk factors and services, and are at greater risk of cancer mortality. While Gypsies, Roma and Travellers have poor health outcomes even in comparison with other ethnic minorities, little is known about how they view and enact primary prevention. This study takes a participatory approach to explore knowledge and experience of cancer prevention and screening in these communities.MethodsPeer researchers conducted interviews (n = 37) and a focus group (n = 4) with a purposive sample of community members in Wales and South-West England. Participants self-identified as Roma (from Slovakia and Romania) or as Gypsies, Travellers or Showpeople (here described as Gypsy/Travellers). A third of the sample were Roma, and a quarter male, with ages ranging from 18 to 77 years. Data were collected from October 2018 to March 2019.ResultsWomen and men knew that lifestyle factors, such as healthy diet, stopping smoking, drinking less alcohol and using sun protection, contribute to cancer risk reduction. However, there was a widespread lack of confidence in the effectiveness of these measures, particularly in relation to smoking. Traditional cultural beliefs were shared by Roma and Gypsy/Travellers, but did not necessarily affect the behaviour of individuals. Most women participated in cervical and breast screening but few Gypsy/Traveller men would engage with bowel screening, which conflicted with community ideals of stoical masculinity. Roma participants described language barriers to screening, with confusion about differences in timing and eligibility between the UK and Slovakian programmes; this led some to access screening abroad.ConclusionThis study provides new knowledge about how Gypsies, Roma and Travellers keep healthy and prevent disease, giving insights into similarities and differences between ages, sexes and communities. These culturally distinct and high-need ethnic minorities have specific needs in relation to cancer prevention and screening, which merit targeted and acceptable health promotion to reduce health inequalities.

Cervical screening attendance and cervical cancer risk among women who have sex with women.

ObjectivesTo describe cervical cancer screening participation among women who have sex exclusively with women (WSEW) and women who have sex with women and men (WSWM) compared with women who have sex exclusively with men (WSEM), and women who have never had sex and compare this with bowel (colorectal) and breast screening participation. To explore whether there is evidence of differential stage 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN3) or cervical cancer risk.MethodsWe describe cervical, bowel and breast cancer screening uptake in age groups eligible for the national screening programmes, prevalent CIN3 and cervical cancer at baseline, and incident CIN3 and cervical cancer at five years follow-up, among 218,674 women in UK Biobank, a cohort of healthy volunteers from the UK.ResultsCompared with WSEM, in adjusted analysis [odds ratio (95% confidence interval)], WSEW 0.10 (0.08–0.13), WSWM 0.73 (0.58–0.91), and women who have never had sex 0.02 (0.01–0.02) were less likely to report ever having attended cervical screening. There were no differences when considering bowel cancer screening uptake (p = 0.61). For breast cancer screening, attendance was lower among WSWM 0.79 (0.68 to 0.91) and women who have never had sex 0.47 (0.29–0.58), compared with WSEM. There were incident and prevalent cases of both CIN3 and cervical cancer among WSEW and WSWM. Compared with WSEM with a single male partner, among WSEW there was a twofold increase in CIN3 1.91 (1.01 to 3.59); among WSWM with only one male partner, this was 2.25 (1.19 to 4.24).ConclusionsThese findings highlight the importance of improving uptake of cervical screening among all women who have sex with women and breast screening among WSWM and women who have never had sex.

Exploring the Barriers Toward Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Literature Review

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of death worldwide. Bowel cancer screening helps prevent colon cancer by early detection of polyps, leading to efficient treatment and reduced mortality. Within Qatar, primary health facilities promote bowel screening by using the faecal occult blood test. However, the popularity and use of this test is still low. Aim: The aim of this literature review is to explore barriers related to colorectal cancer bowel screening using the faecal occult blood test in primary health care settings to facilitate colorectal cancer screening in Qatar. Method: Cronin’s five step framework for literature reviews was utilized for this paper. This review included nine articles that were peer-reviewed and published between 2009 and 2019. The nine articles were appraised by using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. This tool has separate criteria to assess the quality of the qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies. Result: Three main barriers to bowel cancer screening included knowledge deficit, personal beliefs and organizational barriers. Conclusion: The main barriers are related to the patients’ lack of knowledge and personal beliefs. Overcoming these barriers is essential to raising awareness about this issue among all nurses, physicians, and patients. It is necessary to involve stakeholders in order to mitigate barriers. Developing educational activities for healthcare professionals will provide information that they can share with patients to encourage screening and decrease the fear of the test. Developing a pamphlet to increase patient awareness will also encourage screening and work toward decreasing fear. Key words: faecal occult blood test, faecal immunochemical test, barriers

Referrals for surgical removal of polyps since the introduction of a colorectal cancer screening programme.

Implementation of the Dutch national bowel screening programme in 2014 led to an increased rate of detection of polyps. In general, polyps should be removed endoscopically. However, if the size and location of the polyp make endoscopic removal technically difficult, or if there is a suspicion for early (T1) cancer, surgery is the preferred method for removal. An increasing number of these patients are being treated with minimally invasive surgical procedures instead of segmental resection. The aim of this study was to assess the number of referrals for surgery and the type of surgery for polyps since the introduction of the Dutch national bowel screening programme. A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients who underwent surgery for colorectal polyps between January 2012 and December 2017 were included. Patients with histologically proven carcinoma prior to surgery were excluded. Primary outcomes were the number and type of surgical procedures for polyps. A total of 164 patients were included. An annual increase in procedures for colorectal polyps was observed, from 18 patients in 2012 to 36 patients in 2017. All the procedures before implementation of the screening programme were segmental resections, and 58.8% of the patients underwent organ-preserving surgery after implementation of the screening. The overall complication rate of organ-preserving surgery was 16.3%, compared with 44.3% for segmental resections (P=0.001). Overall, invasive colorectal cancer was encountered in 23.8% of cases. The number of referrals for surgical resection of colorectal polyps has doubled since the introduction of the Dutch national bowel screening programme with a substantial shift towards organ-preserving techniques.

Impact of the introduction of a new policy of direct faecal immunochemical home screening test provision in a national bowel screening programme, both during and outside of advertising campaigns

BackgroundBowelScreen, The National Bowel Screening Programme in Ireland, offers free colorectal screening to persons aged 60-69 through a home Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit. 40.2% uptake in the first screening round was below the programme standard (≥50.0%). To improve uptake, an intervention saw FIT kits sent directly to previously screened clients rather than by the usual invitation process comprising a letter of invitation followed by a FIT kit if requested. The intervention proved successful and was fully implemented into the programme for subsequent clients. Despite the improved uptake it was noted over time that the unsatisfactory FIT rate was approaching the programme standard (≤3%). The aim of this study is to compare uptake by two invite methods occurring contemporaneously alongside advertising and to compare unsatisfactory rates before and after full FIT-Direct implementation. MethodsPercentage uptake and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each invite method before and after advertising and compared using two-proportion z-tests. Rate ratios and 95% CI compared the unsatisfactory FIT rate before and after full-FIT Direct implementation. ResultsUptake was significantly higher amongst FIT-Direct compared with Usual-Invite clients during (91.0% vs 84.9%, p < 0.0001) and outside advertising (93.8% vs 85.3%, p < 0.0001). The unsatisfactory FIT rate was 2.3 times higher (95% CI: 1.84-2.92, p < 0.0001) after full FIT-Direct implementation compared with before. ConclusionsThe FIT-Direct intervention had an overall positive effect on uptake. After adjusting for advertising, uptake of FIT was higher outside advertising periods. Monitoring of the unsatisfactory rate is ongoing; a communication enhancement strategy may be required should this persist.

The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)\u2014a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundThere is currently no existing evidence on the effects of personalised risk information on uptake of colonoscopy following first line screening for colorectal cancer. This study aimed to measure the impact of providing risk information based on faecal haemoglobin concentration to allow a fully informed choice around whether or not to undergo colonoscopy.MethodsTwo thousand seven hundred sixty-seven participants from the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme (SBoSP) database, who had not recently been invited for screening, were randomised to receive one of three types of hypothetical risk information materials: (1) numerical risk information (risk categories of one in 40, one in 1600 and one in 3500), (2) categorical risk information (highest, moderate and lowest risk), or (3) positive screening result letter (control group). The primary outcome was the impact of the risk materials on intention to undergo colonoscopy, to allow comparison with the current colonoscopy uptake of 77% for those with a positive screening result in the SBoSP. Secondary outcomes were knowledge, attitudes and emotional responses to the materials.ResultsFour hundred thirty-four (15.7%) agreed to participate with 100 from the numerical risk group (69.0%), 104 from the categorical risk group (72.2%) and 104 from the control group (71.7%) returning completed materials. Intention to undergo colonoscopy was highest in the highest risk groups for the numerical and categorical study arms (96.8% and 95.3%, respectively), but even in the lowest risk groups was > 50% (58.1% and 60.7%, respectively). Adequate knowledge of colorectal screening and the risks and benefits of colonoscopy was found in ≥ 98% of participants in all three arms. All participants reported that they found the information easy-to-understand. 19.1%, 24.0% and 29.6% of those in the numerical, categorical and control group, respectively, reported that they found the information distressing (p > 0.05).ConclusionsApplying the risk categories to existing SBoSP data shows that if all participants were offered an informed choice to have colonoscopy, over two thirds of participants would intend to have the test. Equating to an increase in the number of screening colonoscopies from approx. 14,000 to 400,000 per annum, this would place an unmanageable demand on colonoscopy services, with a very small proportion of cancers and pre-cancers detected. However, the response to the materials were very positive, suggesting that providing risk information to those in lowest and moderate risk groups along with advice that colonoscopy is not currently recommended may be an option. Future research would be required to examine actual uptake.Trial registrationDate applied 1 December 2017 ISRCTN number 14254582.

318 Poster - The risk of colorectal cancer associated with BRCA 1 and/or BRCA 2 mutation carriers: systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction: Carriers of the BRCA 1 and/or BRCA 2 mutation incur a lifetime risk of up to 85% for breast cancer and between 20 and 40% for ovarian cancer. Efforts to elucidate the lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer with BRCA carrier mutations have demonstrated conflicting results. Consequently, there are no formal guidelines regarding the necessity for bowel screening for individuals with BRCA 1 and/or BRCA 2 mutations. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine the risk of colorectal cancer associated with BRCA carrier mutations.

Barriers to home bowel screening test in South Asians in the UK

Abstract Background Bowel cancer is common and accounts for 10% of all cancer mortality. Early detection significantly reduces mortality. In the UK, the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme invites adults aged 60-74 years to carry out a home screening test biennially. The national target for test completion is 60%; completion is substantially lower (∼30%) amongst South Asian populations. Our aim was to develop a community-based intervention to increase completion of the home bowel screening test in South Asians. Methods Multi-methods comprising two stages: 1) group and individual interviews with South Asians aged 50-74 years purposively sampled from community groups for maximum variation. Semi-structured interviews based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) investigated determinants of bowel screening completion. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using framework analysis and findings mapped onto the COM-B Behaviour Change Wheel; 2) Co-production of intervention during two workshops with key stakeholders and target population. Results To-date 25 adults recruited of Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnicity with variation in age, gender, first language, faith, and compliance with bowel screening. Key barriers and TDF domains that they mapped to were: - lack of knowledge about bowel cancer and screening; lack of language, literacy and physical ability (skills) to carry out the home test; confidence to carry it out correctly (belief about capabilities); appropriate space and time to carry out the test (environmental context and resources); putting off undertaking the test (memory attention and decision processes); risk perception and fear of cancer (emotions). Enablers were: social influences from peers; goals and motivations. Conclusions Early results suggest an intervention comprising education, persuasion, modelling and enablement functions could increase completion of the home test. Key messages Community engagement and working with community leaders enhanced the success of recruitment. The TDF was a useful framework for identifying barriers to home bowel screening test by South Asians in the South East of England.

Variation in changes in the incidence of colorectal cancer by age and association with screening uptake: an observational study

ObjectivesIn developed countries, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has declined in the over 50 years age group but increased in younger people. We studied CRC incidence by age and the influence of screening uptake.DesignAge-standardised and sex-standardised incidences for CRC from 1997 to 2017 were obtained from the Scottish Cancer Registry (SCR). In addition, linkage between the Scottish Bowel Screening Database and the SCR allowed investigation of any association between screening participation and CRC incidence.SettingScotland and the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme, in which guaiac faecal occult blood test screening was piloted from March 2000 and fully rolled by December 2009.ParticipantsFrom the introduction of screening in 2000 through to 2017, 2 395 172 were invited to participate, of whom 1 487 999 participated at least once.Main outcome measuresIncidence of CRC.ResultsIn the screening age range (50–74 years), CRC incidence peaked at 156.5 cases per 100 000 in 2010 after full roll-out of screening across Scotland but fell to 123.9 per 100 000 in 2017. However, under 50 years, there was a rise from 5.3 cases per 100 000 in 2000 to 6.8 per 100 000 in 2017. When CRC incidence was examined in those who had been offered screening, incidence fell in the participant group more than in the non-participant group after roll-out of screening was complete. Analysis of cumulative incidence demonstrated that CRC incidence in the participant group remained consistently below that of the non-participant from around 7 years of follow-up.ConclusionsThe incidence of CRC in Scotland has declined in the over 50 years age group but increased in younger people. It is likely that population screening has contributed to the reduction in CRC incidence in the over 50 years age group.