Bowel Endometriosis Research Articles

Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Endometriosis: Diagnosis and Clinical Characteristics

Background/Objectives: Endometriosis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) share some epidemiological, clinical and pathogenetic features. A differential diagnosis between pelvic endometriosis and IBD may be challenging, even for expert clinicians. In the present review, we aimed to summarize the currently available data regarding the relationship between endometriosis and IBD and their possible association. Methods: The PubMed and Scopus database were considered, by searching the following terms: “Crohn’s Disease”, “Ulcerative Colitis”, “Endometriosis”, “Adenomyosis”, and “Inflammatory Bowel Disease”, individually or combined. Full-text papers published in English with no date restriction were considered. Results: Few studies have researched the possible association between endometriosis and IBD. Both conditions are characterized by chronic recurrent symptoms, which may be shared (abdominal pain, fatigue, infertility, menstrual irregularities, diarrhea, constipation). Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) can cause bowel symptoms. In a large Danish study, a 50% increased risk of IBD was observed in women with endometriosis. A missed diagnosis of endometriosis and an increased risk of endometriosis has been reported in IBD. Current evidence does not support an association between endometriosis and IBD characteristics. However, IBD may be associated with DIE, characterized by pelvic symptoms (dyschezia, dyspareunia). Preliminary observations suggest an increased IBD risk in patients with endometriosis treated with hormonal therapy. Conclusions: Current findings suggest that a careful search is needed for concomitant endometriosis in subgroups of patients with IBD showing compatible symptoms and vice versa. A multidisciplinary approach including dedicated gastroenterologists and gynecologists is required for a proper search for IBD and endometriosis in subgroups of patients. This approach may avoid diagnostic delays or overtreatments for these conditions.

Conservative Management of Bowel Endometriosis: Cross-Sectional Analysis for Assessing Clinical Outcomes and Quality-of-Life

Background/Objectives: Bowel endometriosis (BE) is characterized by the presence of endometrial-like tissue within the muscular layer of the bowel wall. When BE does not result in the severe obstruction to fecal transit and in the absence of (sub)occlusive symptoms, the decision to perform surgery can be challenging, as intestinal procedures are associated with higher complication rates and long-term bowel dysfunction. This cross-sectional study aims to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) in patients with BE who avoided surgery, as well as to investigate the impact of the characteristics of BE nodules on the QoL and intestinal function. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted involving 580 patients with BE who did not undergo surgery but were treated conservatively with medical therapy or expectant management between January 2017 and August 2022. The diagnosis of BE was established through transvaginal ultrasound and confirmed via double contrast barium enema. After at least one year of follow-up, the QoL and intestinal function were assessed using the Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) questionnaire and the Bowel Endometriosis Symptom (BENS) score, while pain symptoms were quantified with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS 0–10). Statistical analyses were performed to explore potential associations between the QoL and the characteristics of BE nodules (size, location, and evidence of stenosis), as well as the type and duration of medical therapy. Results: Patients with BE reported a satisfactory overall QoL, with a mean EHP-5 score of 105.42 ± 99.98 points and a VAS score below three across all pain domains. They did not demonstrate significant impairment in bowel function, as indicated by a mean BENS score of 4.89 ± 5.28 points. Notably, patients receiving medical therapy exhibited a better QoL compared to those not receiving treatment (p < 0.05), with the exception of postmenopausal patients, who reported the highest QoL overall (p < 0.05). Among the characteristics of BE, nodule location significantly impacted the QoL and symptom intensity, with low (rectal or rectosigmoid) nodules less tolerated compared to sigmoid nodules, particularly regarding non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP), dyschezia, and psychological impact on daily life (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Women can effectively manage BE conservatively in the absence of (sub)occlusive symptoms, even when large nodules are present, causing significant radiological stenosis. The characteristics of BE nodules do not significantly affect the QoL or symptom intensity; however, the location of BE nodules is a crucial factor negatively influencing these outcomes. Medical therapy may confer a beneficial impact on patients of reproductive age with BE, but its use should be carefully considered for those approaching menopause, weighing the risks and benefits.

Rectosigmoid Endometriosis Causing Large Bowel Obstruction.

Large bowel obstruction is most commonly due to colorectal carcinoma, diverticular disease or volvulus. Rare causes of large bowel obstruction like endometriosis may occur in premenopausal women and diagnosis of large bowel endometriosis can be challenging to confirm preoperatively. Hence, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for rare causes of large bowel obstruction like endometriosis. This may require complete surgical resection of the involved bowel to eliminate the risk of local recurrence.

Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Women Treated for Bowel Endometriosis: A Seven-Year Single-Centre Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

Background/Objectives: Deep infiltrating endometriosis has been linked to worsened maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, reports regarding bowel endometriosis are still scanty. We aimed to evaluate pregnancy, delivery, and newborn adverse outcomes in women after laparoscopic-assisted surgery for bowel endometriosis. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary-care university hospital. From January 2015 to December 2021, pregnant women who were diagnosed and treated for bowel endometriosis were matched using a 1:3 ratio with pregnant women with no history of endometriosis. Patients were matched using the Cox proportional hazards model to determine parity, age, BMI and gestational age-adjusted relative risk (aRR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Co-primary outcomes were the incidence of labor abnormalities and cesarean section (CS) rate. Co-secondary outcomes were incidence of complications related to pregnancy, delivery, and newborn. Results: A total of 71 pregnancies among women treated for bowel endometriosis and 213 from healthy controls were included. Patients requiring IVF/ET for getting pregnant were in the bowel endometriosis group relative to controls (43.7% vs. 11.7%; p < 0.001). Increased risk of labor abnormalities was present for bowel endometriosis relative to controls (21.1% vs. 17.4%; p = 0.040; aRR 1.39 [95% CI 1.06–2.05]). Risk of non-cephalic fetal presentation (14.1% vs. 6.1%; p = 0.016; aRR 3.08 [95% CI 2.03–4.68]), CS rate (43.7% vs. 24.9%; p = 0.003; aRR 1.75 [95% CI 1.23–2.49]), and emergent CS rate (19.7% vs. 8.5%; p = 0.009; aRR 2.21 [95% CI 1.55–3.16]) were significantly higher in women treated for colorectal endometriosis compared with controls. Moreover, placenta previa (9.9% vs. 0.0%; p < 0.001; aRR 21.82 [95% CI 2.19–116.40]), second-trimester hemorrhage (5.6% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.017; aRR 6.00 [95% CI 1.12–32.06]), postpartum hemorrhage (15.5% vs. 3.3%; p < 0.001; aRR 4.71 [95% CI 1.90–11.70]), and the need for transfusion during labor (5.6% vs. 0.5%; p = 0.004; aRR 12.00 [95% CI 1.36–105.60]) were increased in treatments vs. controls. Concerning neonatal outcomes, an increased risk for neonatal intensive care unit admission was seen in postsurgical endometriotic women relative to healthy controls (26.0% vs. 6.9%; p < 0.001; aRR 3.75 [2.04–3.86]). Conclusions: Women treated for bowel endometriosis seem more exposed to adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes relative to healthy controls. However, additional prospective and comparative studies are needed to validate the available evidence.

Total Laparoscopic Segmental Resection with Transanal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction for Treatment of Colorectal Endometriosis: Descriptive Analysis from the TrEnd Study Database

ObjectiveTo report our 3-year institutional experience of total laparoscopic (TL) segmental sigmoid colon/rectal resection for treatment of bowel endometriosis (BE). DesignThe TrEnd trial is a single-institutional retrospective/prospective study conducted with the aim of systematically collecting data from consecutive patients undergoing segmental colorectal resection for BE. This paper reports the outcomes of patients undergoing intracorporeal anastomosis and transanal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) from this database. Primary endpoints were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this approach in terms of complications, conversion to conventional technique/open surgery, endometriosis-free bowel resection margins, recurrence. Secondary endpoints were to assess intraoperative blood loss, operating time, gastrointestinal function recovery, duration of hospital stay, and reproductive outcomes. SettingMalzoni Research Hospital, Avellino, Italy. ParticipantsOnly patients undergoing TL colorectal resection with transanal NOSE were included in the present analysis. Patients were considered noneligible if they had received concomitant hysterectomy and/or transvaginal NOSE. InterventionsResults presented here are descriptive. ResultsEighty-one patients were included in the present analysis. Postoperative severe complications occurred in 3.7%. No cases of intraoperative complications or conversion to conventional technique/open surgery occurred. Final pathology showed endometriosis-free resection margins in all colorectal specimens. After a median follow-up of 21 months, all patients were free from BE. Median blood loss was 20 mL. Median length of surgery was 160 minutes. Median hospital length of stay was 3 days. All patients achieved the first passage of flatus on postoperative day 1. Median time to first defecation was 4 days. Twenty-six patients attempted to conceive. Nine of them were pregnant and 2 gave birth to a healthy child. ConclusionThis study represents the main experience on TL segmental colorectal resection for BE treatment. The observed optimal outcomes seem to recommend further studies to assess safety and efficacy of said surgical technique in women with BE.Clinical trial registry name:ClinicalTrials.gov.

Assessment of Education and Management of Endometriosis Among Colorectal Surgeons and Residents

Study ObjectiveA To identify the type of endometriosis education and surgical training colorectal surgery residents are exposed to during training. b To determine the current surgical management of endometriosis among recently graduated colorectal surgeons and their level of comfort. DesignA qualitative cross-sectional study was performed. An anonymous questionnaire was emailed to colorectal surgery residents of 2023 and recent graduates for completion. Data was then extracted and analyzed from REDCap. A chi-square test was performed on the primary outcome variables. SettingA REDCap electronic survey was administered through email to each participant. PatientsAll colorectal surgery residents in 2023 and recent graduates from Colon and Rectal Surgery subspecialty from 2012 to 2022. InterventionsA 17-item anonymous questionnaire was sent via email through REDCap. Measurements and Main ResultsThe survey was completed by 70 participants. Most respondents (58.5%) did not receive formal education on bowel endometriosis. Forty percent of participants (28/70) did not feel they received adequate training for surgical management of bowel endometriosis. In terms of surgical exposure, 3.8% (2) responded they had been involved in >15 bowel endometriosis cases and 18 (25.7%) had been exposed to 1–5 cases during colorectal training. Factors that predicted feeling adequately trained in managing endometriosis included formal endometriosis education (OR 4.70, 95% CI 1.37−16.12, p-value .027) and surgical exposure during training (OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.18–16.26, p-value .014). Additionally, the number of cases exposed during training is highly correlated with feeling adequately trained. ConclusionMore than half of colorectal surgeons did not receive formal education on bowel endometriosis and the majority had only been exposed to 1–5 cases during their colorectal training. An overwhelming majority were interested in further education. This study highlights opportunities for improvement in the exposure to education and surgical management of endometriosis among colorectal surgery trainees.

Lesion size and location in deep infiltrating bowel endometriosis: Correlation with gastrointestinal dysfunction and pain.

Presence of deep infiltrating bowel endometriosis (DE) is associated with occurrence of dyschezia and gastrointestinal symptoms. The degree of the disease, the lesion length, and the location, that is, lesion-to-anal-verge distance (LAVD) of DE, as well as the severity of the symptoms appear to be correlated. Nevertheless, it is not yet known to what extent the size and LAVD of bowel DE influence the severity of gastrointestinal symptoms. The present study aims to evaluate a possible correlation of lesion location (LAVD) and size (according to the #Enzian classification) with preoperative symptoms. In this prospective study, premenopausal patients with histologically confirmed DE undergoing modified limited nerve-vessel sparing rectal segmental bowel resection or full-thickness discoid resection were evaluated. Extent of endometriosis was defined according to the #Enzian classification during surgery. The primary outcome measure was the correlation between lesion size and location with the GI function impairment reflected by presurgical lower anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores; the secondary outcome was differences in presurgical numeric rating scale pain scores of dyschezia, dyspareunia, and dysmenorrhea as well as the impact of concomitant DE of other locations on symptom intensity. Of 162 consecutive patients, 151 were included in the final analysis. No significant correlation was observed between lesion size (#Enzian compartments C1/C2/C3) or LAVD and GI dysfunction reflected by LARS-like symptoms (p = 0.314 and p = 0.185, respectively) or pain symptoms (dyschezia, p = 0.440; dyspareunia, p = 0.136; and dysmenorrhea p = 0.221). Furthermore, no significant correlation was observed between lesion size and GI dysfunction when merging two severity grades (#Enzian compartments C1 plus C2 vs. C3; p = 0.611). In addition, LAVD did not affect the degree of dyschezia (p = 0.892), dyspareunia (p = 0.395), or dysmenorrhea (p = 0.705). Finally, the presence of concomitant DE lesions infiltrating the vagina/rectovaginal space (#Enzian compartment A) and/or sacrouterine ligaments/parametrium (#Enzian compartment B) did not alter the severity of preoperative dyschezia (p = 0.493) or dysmenorrhea (p = 0.128) but showed a trend toward affecting gastrointestinal function (p = 0.078) and was significantly associated with dyspareunia (p = 0.035). In present study, we could not find a correlation between colorectal DE lesion size and location (LAVD) and gastrointestinal function impairment or intensity of dyschezia and dysmenorrhea. Additional involvement of vagina/rectovaginal space (#Enzian compartment A) and/or sacrouterine ligaments/parametrium (#Enzian compartment B) exerts a significant impact on the degree of dyspareunia in women with colorectal DE.

Intraoperative transvaginal ultrasound to standardize bowel endometriosis shaving

To study the use of intraoperative transvaginal ultrasound after bowel endometriosis shaving. Stepwise demonstration with a narrated video footage of preoperative and intraoperative ultrasound to evaluate the extent of an endometriotic rectal nodule. Lausanne University Hospital and Geneva University Hospital. Two women with symptomatic endometriosis rectal lesion. Preoperative transvaginal ultrasound was performed to measure the rectal nodule. After completing bowel shaving, the surgeon conducted both clinical and sonographic evaluations of the rectal wall. Clinically, this was performed using laparoscopic grasping forceps and sonographically with a transvaginal probe after filling the pelvis with saline solution. Assessment of the rectal wall for residual disease after bowel shaving and evaluation of the necessity for additional bowel resection. After sonographic evaluation of the rectal wall, the surgeon decided in both patients to perform a discoid resection because of the presence of a residual rectal disease despite thorough bowel shaving. Intraoperative transvaginal ultrasound after bowel endometriosis shaving is a promising technique that is safe, reproducible, and efficient. It aids surgeons in accurately assessing the extent of excision of deep rectosigmoid infiltrating endometriosis and determining the necessity of additional bowel resection to reduce recurrence risk. Moreover, intraoperative ultrasound provides precise measurements of residual nodules, enabling differentiation between persistent, recurrent, or new lesions during follow-up.

Surgical Treatment of Patients with Endometriosis in the Certified Endometriosis Centers of the DACH Region - A Subanalysis of the Quality Assurance Study QS ENDO pilot.

Introduction After puberty, at least 10% of all women and girls suffer from endometriosis. Surgery is useful for both the diagnosis and therapy. To date, quality indicators for the surgical treatment of endometriosis are lacking. QS ENDO aims to record the quality of care provided in the DACH region and to introduce quality indicators for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. In the first phase of the study, QS ENDO real, the reality of care was recorded using a questionnaire. The second phase, QS ENDO pilot, investigated the treatment of patients who underwent surgery in certified endometriosis centers in a defined time-period. Material and Methods The surgical data of 10 patients from each of the 44 endometriosis centers in the DACH region was recorded using an online tool. Collected data included the approach used, the endometriosis phenotype, a description of the surgical site, resection status, histological confirmation, the use of a classification, and any complications. All operations were carried out in October 2016 as the defined time-period. The surgical approaches used were compared with the recommendations in the current guidelines. Results The data of 435 patients with a median age of 34years were evaluated. 315 (72.4%) were nulliparous. 120patients had given birth to at least one child and 42.5% (51) of them had delivered their child by caesarean section. About 50% of all patients also had deep infiltrating endometriosis in addition to ovarian endometriosis, and the median NAS score was 7.5. With regards to the surgical treatment, endometriomas were completely resected in 81% (94) of patients. 87.3% of patients underwent resection of peritoneal endometriosis. Forty-one patients had a hysterectomy, with a total hysterectomy carried out in 26 (63.4%) and a supracervical hysterectomy in 15 (36.6%) patients. Of the 59 patients with bowel endometriosis, half had segmental resection and half had shaving of the anterior rectal wall. Complications requiring revision occurred in 0.9% of cases. Conclusion The surgical procedures carried out in the certified endometriosis centers of the DACH region are largely in line with the recommendations for appropriate surgical approaches in the current standard guidelines.

(039) DIVERSITY OF CAUSES OF DYSPAREUNIA IN REAL CLINICAL PRACTICE IN THE OUTPATIENT GYNECOLOGY DEPARTMENT

Abstract Introduction Dyspareunia is a women's sexual health problem that still often goes undiagnosed, despite its high prevalence and negative impact on sexual, marital and psychological well-being. Genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD) refers to significant pain and difficulty with penetrative sex that lasts for at least six months and might be caused by various diseases alone and their combinations. Objective Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine the contribution of different conditions to the total number of patients who applied for a primary appointment for GPPPD. Methods Women who agreed to participate in the study were presenting complaints on painful intercourse or inability to have intercourse for more than 6 months. Patients underwent a gynecological examination consisted of inspection, Q-tip testing, pelvic floor muscle testing and bimanual palpation in the lithotomy position (if it was possible). Diagnoses were documented according to the International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision World Health Organization guidelines. Pain was assessed via the McGill Pain Questionnaire and a visual analogue scale. Assessment of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction was based on an International Continence Society report on the terminology for pelvic floor muscle assessment. Vulvar pain conditions were classified based on the consensus vulvar pain terminology committee of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease, the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health, and International Pelvic Pain Society. Statistical analyses were performed by SPSS Statistics. Results The average age of the examined women was 30,63±0,69 years. As a cause of GPPPD vaginismus and dyspareunia were diagnosed in 19.31 and 80.69 % respectively. Predominant cause of dyspareunia was pelvic floor muscles dysfunction (66,19%) which was combined with other pathologies (scar deformity of the perineum, endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain, candidiasis, etc.) in 20 cases. The percentage of women diagnosed with endometriosis without the formation of central pain mechanisms was 11.36%. The overlapping chronic pain conditions such as migraine, interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, endometriosis and vulvodynia were diagnosed in 21.13% patients with dyspareunia. Dyspareunia due to vaginal atrophy associated with lactation, combined oral contraception use and menopause was diagnosed in 4 patients (2.82%, 1.41% and 1.41%, respectively). Scar changes of the perineum due to traumatic delivery or episiotomy amounted to 4.23%. Lichen planus was diagnosed in one patient (1.41%). Vulvodynia was diagnosed in 8 patients with dyspareunia (11.26%) and was associated with pelvic floor tension myalgia and pelvic floor myofascial pain syndrome in 75% of cases. Conclusions GPPPD can be caused by various conditions with significant involvement of the pelvic floor muscles in the process of pain formation. Taking into account the risk of overlapping chronic pain conditions, a multidisciplinary approach is required in the treatment of this group of patients. Disclosure No.

Surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis: an updated review.

This review aims to summarize recent literature on the surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis. The last decade has seen a surge in the number of studies on bowel endometriosis, with a focus on preoperative evaluation, perioperative management, surgical approach, and surgical outcomes. Many of these studies have originated from large-volume referral centers with varying surgical approaches and philosophies. Colorectal surgery for endometriosis seems to have a positive impact on patient symptoms, quality of life, and fertility. However, these benefits must be weighed against a significant risk of postoperative complications and the potential for long-term bowel or bladder dysfunction, especially for more radical procedures involving the lower rectum. Importantly, most studies regarding surgical technique and outcomes have been limited by their observational design. The surgical management of bowel endometriosis is complex and should be approached by a multidisciplinary team. Methodical preoperative evaluation, including appropriate imaging, is vital for surgical planning and patient counseling. The decision to perform a more conservative or radical excision is nuanced and remains an area of controversy. High quality studies in the form of multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed before clear recommendations can be made.

Postoperative Reproductive Outcomes in Patients with Endometriosis-Associated Infertility: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Objectives: Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease known to contribute to infertility. Laparoscopic excision of endometriotic lesions represents a standard treatment modality for symptomatic women. Our study aims to assess the potential benefits of laparoscopic excision of endometriosis in patients experiencing infertility associated with the condition, as well as to define the clinical factors that may impact the cumulative pregnancy rate. Design: In this retrospective analysis, a total of 102 patients with endometriosis-related infertility were enrolled. Materials, Setting, Methods: All participants underwent reproductive surgery and were then categorized into two groups: those who conceived were assigned to group A, while those who did not were assigned to group B. The correlation between clinical factors and pregnancy rate was assessed using the log-rank test, and both univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted utilizing the Cox regression model. Results: The median age of the patients was 33.5 years, with a median follow-up duration of 70 months. Throughout the study period, 71 patients (69.6%) conceived (group A), while the remaining 31 patients (30.4%) did not conceive (group B), irrespective of the use of Assisted-Reproduction Technologies. The Cox regression model revealed that factors such as the duration of infertility, presence of deep infiltrating endometriosis, bowel endometriosis, rASRM stages, pelvic adhesions, and recurrent disease negatively impacted postoperative conception rates. Conversely, complete excision and coagulation of endometriotic lesions, as well as ablation of ovarian endometriomas, emerged as independent positive predictive factors for postoperative clinical pregnancy. Limitations: Limitations of this study is retrospective design of the study, as well as a small number of patients. Conclusions: Complete excision of endometriosis during reproductive surgery may yield a positive effect and optimize the likelihood of pregnancy in patients with endometriosis-related infertility.

A 24-Months Follow-Up Study of Individuals With Endometriosis Using Transvaginal Ultrasound

Study ObjectiveTo investigate the progression of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) using transvaginal ultrasound surveillance of patients undergoing conservative management. DesignRetrospective single cohort. SettingAustralian tertiary university hospital Patients122 women with endometriosis proven on transvaginal ultrasound who had not undergone surgical management. InterventionsThe progression of endometriosis lesions demonstrated on transvaginal ultrasound in women receiving conservative management over the course of 24 months. Measurements and Main Results122 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All women had two ultrasounds that were performed at least 6 months apart. The median follow up time was 490.5 days (255.4 - 725.6). At second scan, 22% (95% CI: 15-30%) of cohort experienced an increase in the number of endometriosis nodules compared to first scan, with 51% (95% CI: 42-60%) remaining static while 27% (95% CI: 19-35%) experienced a decrease. While there was no statistically significant difference in the volumes of uterosacral ligament, retro cervical and bowel endometriosis, endometrioma volumes were significantly lower at second scan (Median = 3.24 mL, IQR = 0.6 - 16.87) as compared to the first scan (Median = 7.41 mL, IQR = 2.04 - 28.95), p<0.001. ConclusionIndividuals with deep infiltrating endometriosis are unlikely to see significant disease progression over time. Both surgical and non-surgical interventions are effective in managing endometriosis in terms of endometriotic nodule size and number, as measured by ultrasound.

Bowel endometriosis excision – approaches and outcomes

Bowel endometriosis excision – approaches and outcomes

Totally intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis (TICA) versus classical mini-laparotomy for specimen extraction, after segmental bowel resection for deep endometriosis: a single-center experience

PurposeThe surgical approach to bowel endometriosis is still unclear. The aim of the study is to compare TICA to conventional specimen extractions and extra-abdominal insertion of the anvil in terms of both complications and functional outcomes.MethodsThis is a single-center, observational, retrospective study conducted enrolling symptomatic women underwent laparoscopic excision of deep endometriosis with segmental bowel resection between September 2019 and June 2022. Women who underwent TICA were compared to classical technique (CT) in terms of intra- and postoperative complications, moreover, functional outcomes relating to the pelvic organs were assessed using validated questionnaires [Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom (KESS) questionnaire and Gastro-Intestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI)] for bowel function. Pain symptoms were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores.ResultsThe sample included 64 women. TICA was performed on 31.2% (n = 20) of the women, whereas CT was used on 68.8% (n = 44). None of the patients experienced rectovaginal, vesicovaginal, ureteral or vesical fistula, or ureteral stenosis and uroperitoneum, and in no cases was it necessary to reoperate. Regarding the two surgical approaches, no significant difference was observed in terms of complications. As concerns pain symptoms at 6-month follow-up evaluations on stratified data, except for dysuria, all VAS scales reported showed significant reductions between median values, for both surgery interventions. As well, significant improvements were further observed in KESS scores and overall GIQLI. Only the GIQLI evaluation was significantly smaller in the TICA group compared to CT after the 6-month follow-up.ConclusionsWe did not find any significant differences in terms of intra- or post-operative complications compared TICA and CT, but only a slight improvement in the Gastro-Intestinal Quality of Life Index in patients who underwent the CT compared to the TICA technique.

Robotic surgery for bowel endometriosis: a multidisciplinary management of a complex entity

BackgroundBowel endometriosis impacts quality of life. Treatment requires complex surgical procedures with associated morbidity. Precision approach with robotic surgery leads to organ preservation. Bowel endometriosis requires a multidisciplinary management to improve patient outcomes. This study evaluates perioperative outcomes of bowel endometriosis undergoing multidisciplinary planning and robotic surgery.MethodsConsecutive cases of multidisciplinary robotic bowel endometriosis procedures (January 2021–December 2022) were evaluated from a prospectively maintained database in a national endometriosis accredited centre. Patients were managed through a multidisciplinary setting including gynaecologists, colorectal robotic surgeons, and other specialists. Dyschezia (menstrual and non-cyclical) and quality of life were assessed pre- and postoperatively (6 months) through validated questionnaires.ResultsSixty-eight consecutive cases of robotic bowel endometriosis were included. Median age was 35.0 (30.2–42.0) years. Median body mass index was 24.0 (21.0–26.7) kg/m2. Procedures performed were 48 (70.6%) shavings, 11 (16.2%) deep shavings, 3 (4.4%) disc excisions, and 6 (8.8%) segmental resections. One (1.5%) patient required temporary stoma. Median operating time was 150 (120–180) min. There were no conversions/return to theatre postoperatively. Median endometriotic nodule size was 25.0 (15.5–40.0) mm. Two (2.9%) patients developed postoperative complications. Median length of postoperative stay was 2 (2–4) days. Median follow-up was 12 (7–17) months. One (1.5%) patient recurred. Median menstrual dyschezia score improved from 5.0 (2.0–8.0) to 1.0 (0.0–5.7). Median non-cyclical dyschezia significantly improved (p < 0.001) from 1.0 (0.0–5.7) to 0.0 (0.0–2.0). Median quality of life score improved from 52.5 (35.0–70.0) to 74.5 (60.0–80.0).ConclusionsRobotic multidisciplinary approach to bowel endometriosis provides good perioperative outcomes with improvement of dyschezia and quality of life.

A case of small intestinal endometriosis with bowel obstruction and perforation

A 47-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with recurring lower abdominal pain persisting for more than 2 weeks. Imaging modalities showed small bowel obstruction caused by a mass lesion in the terminal ileum. Despite undergoing fasting, rehydration, and decompression through an ileus tube, her symptoms persisted. Furthermore, the condition deteriorated on day 4, with the onset of her menstrual period. An emergency surgery was conducted on the 7th day after hospitalization. Surgical observations indicated severe stenosis around the ileocecal valve and ileal perforation approximately 40cm from the oral stricture. As a result, ileocecal resection was performed. Pathological examination revealed endometrial tissue infiltration through the mucosal lamina propria to the ileal subserosa. Thus, the patient was identified with intestinal endometriosis of the ileocecum. Endometriosis of the small bowel is an uncommon condition that eventually causes intractable bowel obstruction. Although preoperative diagnosis is considered challenging, intestinal endometriosis should be included in the differential diagnosis in cases of bowel obstruction in women of childbearing age.

Robotic Management of Recurrent Rectal Endometriosis After Previous Segmental Bowel Resection

To describe the management of recurrent bowel endometriosis after previous colorectal resection. Surgical video article. The local institutional board review was omitted due to the narration of surgical management. Patient consent was obtained. A tertiary referral center. The patient first underwent segmental bowel resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum in the ENDORE randomized controlled trial in 2012 and then received a total hysterectomy in 2018. Five years later, she presented with recurrent nodules in the rectovaginal, left parametrium, and abdominal wall after discontinuing medical suppressive treatment. Laparoscopic management using robotic assistance was employed to complete excision of the rectovaginal nodule. Disc excision was performed to remove rectal infiltration. The procedure started with rectal shaving and excision of vaginal infiltration . A traction stitch was placed over the limits of the rectal shaving area. The general surgeon placed a 28 mm circular anal stapler transanally and performed complete excision of the shaved rectal area. Anastomotic perfusion was checked with indocyanine green. A methylene blue enema test was conducted to rule out anastomotic leakage. Outcomes were favorable, with systematic self-catheterization during 5 postoperative weeks. No specific symptoms were related to the other 2 nodules, which were not removed. Rectal recurrences may occur long after colorectal resection and outside the limits of the previous surgery site. To accurately assess this risk, long-term follow-up of patients is mandatory.. Postoperative medical amenorrhea may play a role in recurrence prevention. Surgical management of recurrences may be challenging and focus on only those nodules responsible for symptoms so as to best preserve the organ's function and reduce postoperative morbidity.

Irritable bowel syndrome and endometriosis: diagnosis, similarities, and nutritional management.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and endometriosis pose significant challenges to affected individuals. IBS, which is a functional gastrointestinal disorder, affects 5-10% of the population, while endometriosis affects 1 in 10 of those assigned female at birth. Despite distinct origins, symptom often overlap, which may lead to misdiagnosis. Diagnosing IBS and endometriosis requires a comprehensive approach. Nutritional management for IBS emphasises self-help strategies, nutritional changes and gut-brain axis modulation. The low FODMAP diet, which reduces the intake of foods containing specific types of carbohydrate, can be effective but requires the support of trained health professionals. For the management of endometriosis, a Mediterranean-style diet rich in antioxidants shows promise. Gastrointestinal symptoms are common with endometriosis and an individualised approach is recommended. Furthermore, vitamin D status assessment is advised. Collaboration between health professionals and dietitians is vital for tailored interventions, to enhance the wellbeing of individuals with IBS or endometriosis. A holistic approach holds promise in symptom management for both conditions.

Appendiceal and bowel endometriosis mimicking acute appendicitis with small bowel obstruction: case report and brief review of the literature

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrium-like tissue outside the uterine cavity. This disease can have a variable presentation with symptoms that range from asymptomatic to non-menstrual pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, bowel symptoms, infertility, among others. We hereby present the case of a 39-year old female that presented to emergency room complaining of abdominal pain in right iliac fossa. Acute appendicitis was suspected, even though CT scan was inconclusive. Diagnostic laparoscopy was scheduled and laparoscopic appendectomy was performed and pathology examination reported acute appendicitis due to appendiceal endometriosis.