Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Research Articles

Enhancing Perioperative Outcomes of Pancreatic Surgery with Wearable Augmented Reality Assistance System: A Matched-Pair Analysis

Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the safety of the first wearable augmented reality assistance system (ARAS) specifically designed for pancreatic surgery and its impact on perioperative outcomes. Background: Pancreatic surgery remains highly complex and is associated with a high rate of perioperative complications. ARAS, as an intraoperative assistance system, has the potential to reduce these complications. Methods: This prospective, single-center study included 20 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery using ARAS. These patients were matched in a 1:3 ratio with 60 patients from our retrospective data who underwent standard pancreatic resection. Matching variables were selected based on factors associated with poor intraoperative outcomes. Results: A higher proportion of patients in the ARAS group were diagnosed with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (20.0% vs 6.7%, P = 0.085). Additionally, more patients in the ARAS group required arterial resection compared with the control group (15.0% vs 0.0%, P = 0.002). Nevertheless, the ARAS group had a significantly shorter operative time (246 vs 299 minutes, P = 0.004) and required significantly fewer intraoperative blood transfusions (0.0 ± 0.0 vs 0.5 ± 1.4 units, P = 0.014). None of the patients in the ARAS group had positive resection margins (0.0% vs 20.0%, P = 0.045). Furthermore, patients in the ARAS group experienced a significantly shorter hospital stay (13.8 ± 6.6 vs 17.9 ± 8.2 days, P = 0.046). Conclusions: ARAS is a safe and effective assistance system for pancreatic surgery, offering superior perioperative outcomes compared with standard procedures.

The Oncological Stress Test of Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review in Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Therapy Compared to Upfront Resection Approach for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, increasingly diagnosed in the United States, has a disheartening initial resection rate of 15%. Neoadjuvant therapy, particularly FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based regimens, is gaining favor for its potential to improve resectability rates and achieving microscopically negative margins (R0) in borderline resectable cases, marked by intricate arterial or venous involvement. Despite surgery being the sole curative approach, actual benefit of neoadjuvant therapy remains debatable. This study scrutinizes current literature on oncological outcomes post-resection of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. A MEDLINE/PubMed search was conducted to systematically compare oncological outcomes of patients treated with either neoadjuvant therapy with intent of curative resection or an "upfront resection" approach. A total of 1293 studies were initially screened and 30 were included (n = 1714) in this analysis. All studies included data on outcomes of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma being treated with neoadjuvant therapy (n = 1387) or a resection-first approach (n = 356). Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy underwent resection 52% of the time, achieving negative margins of 43% (n = 601). Approximately 77% of patients who received an upfront resection underwent a successful resection, with 39% achieving negative margins. Neoadjuvant therapy remains marginally efficacious in treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, as patients undergo an operation and successful resection less often when treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Rates of curative resection are comparable, despite neoadjuvant therapy being a primary recommendation in borderline resectable cases and employed more often than upfront resection. Upfront resection may offer improved resection rates by intention-to-treat, which can provide more patients with paths to curative resection.

Values of apparent diffusion coefficient in pancreatic cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy

BackgroundTo investigate the values of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the treatment response evaluation in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).MethodsThis study included 103 NAT patients with histologically proven PC. ADC maps were generated using monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging (b values: 50, 800 s/mm2). Tumors’ minimum, maximum, and mean ADCs were measured and compared pre- and post-NAT. Variations in ADC values measured between pre- and post-NAT completion for NAT methods (chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy), tumor locations (head/neck, body/tail), tumor regression grade (TRG) levels (0–2, 3), N stages (N0, N1/N2) and tumor resection margin status (R0, R1), were further analyzed.ResultsThe minimum, maximum, and mean ADC values all increased dramatically after NAT, rising from 23.4 to 25.4% (all p < 0.001): mean (average: 1.626 × 10− 3 mm2/s vs. 1.315 × 10− 3 mm2/s), minimum (median: 1.274 × 10− 3 mm2/s vs. 1.034 × 10− 3 mm2/s), and maximum (average: 1.981 × 10− 3 mm2/s vs. 1.580 × 10− 3 mm2/s). The ADCs between the subgroups of all the criteria under investigation did not differ significantly for the minimum, maximum, or mean values pre- or post-NAT (P = 0.08 to 1.00). In the patients with borderline resectable PC (n = 47), the rate of tumor size changes after NAT was correlated with the pre-NAT mean ADC values (Spearman’s coefficient: 0.288, P = 0.049).ConclusionsThe ADC values of PC increased significantly following NAT; however, the percentage increases failed to provide any predictive value for the resection margin status or TRG levels.

The Relationship between Treatment Response and Overall Survival in Borderline, Non-Resectable and Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX.

Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-recommended treatment for patients with borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) involves a combination of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and the curative surgical resection of the tumor. This study seeks to identify the clinical, radiological, laboratory, and pathologic predictors that can anticipate the oncological outcomes of patients. Methods: In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone curative surgical resection for BRPC, LAPC, or resectable disease with high-risk features after receiving neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX at two institutions. We evaluated by means of multivariate analysis whether clinical and laboratory response, tumor markers, radiological response, and pathologic tumor response grade correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: The study enrolled a total of 70 patients with BRPC, LAPC, and resectable disease with high-risk features who underwent resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Age above 65 years and fewer than nine cycles of chemotherapy (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.4-12.0; p-value 0.007); locally advanced tumors after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) (OR 7.0; 95% CI 1.9-25.7; p-value 0.003); and lymph node disease and histological tumor regression grade 2 and 3 (OR 4.3; 95% CI 0.9-19.2; p-value 0.05) were risk factors linked to adverse OS and DFS. The median OS and DFS were 33 (22-43.9) months and 16.5 (11.3-21.6) months, respectively. Conclusions: Classification as a LA tumor after NAT was the only preoperative radiological factor that predicted adverse survival in patients undergoing curative surgery after NAT. Other clinical, biochemical, and radiological measures of response were not found to predict OS. Patient age, the cumulative administration of more than eight cycles of chemotherapy, and a significant pathological response were associated with better OS. The results of this study are important for treatment decision-making and prognostication in patients with BRPC and LAPC.

LBA62 Preoperative modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) with or without chemoradiation (CRT) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC): Results from the randomized phase II trial PANDAS/PRODIGE 44

LBA62 Preoperative modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) with or without chemoradiation (CRT) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC): Results from the randomized phase II trial PANDAS/PRODIGE 44

1514P A prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, evaluator-blinded, feasibility clinical trial for efficacy and safety of a non-tissue destructive compact focused ultrasound system with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

1514P A prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, evaluator-blinded, feasibility clinical trial for efficacy and safety of a non-tissue destructive compact focused ultrasound system with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

Evaluating surgeon communication of pancreatic cancer prognosis using the VitalTalk ADAPT framework.

Few data exist to guide optimal communication practices for surgical oncologists. VitalTalk, an evidence-based communication skills training model for clinicians, offers the five-step ADAPT tool for discussing prognosis. This study aimed to characterize surgeon communication of pancreatic cancer prognosis using VitalTalk's ADAPT framework. Contemporaneous audio recordings from 12 initial surgeon-patient encounters for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were transcribed. Directed qualitative content analysis based on ADAPT (Ask, Discover, Anticipate, Provide, and Track) was used to deductively code transcripts. All encounters contained at least one ADAPT step while only one (8%) incorporated four or five steps. Surgeons provided prognostic information (Provide) in all but one encounter (92%); most was qualitative and clustered into themes: serious illness, surgical candidacy, prognostic ambiguity, and cancer recurrence. Surgeons elicited understanding (Ask), requested information preferences (Discover), anticipated ambivalence (Anticipate), and responded to emotion (Track) in a minority of encounters (25%-42%); of 15 patient emotional cues, six were not addressed by surgeons. During an initial encounter for pancreatic cancer, surgeons focus heavily on providing information but omit critical prognostic communication steps. Future studies are needed to investigate if surgeon training in palliative care-based communicationis feasible and impacts patient-perceived quality of communication.

Prognostic Impact of a Decrease in Serum Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Levels After Preoperative Therapy for 4 Months or More for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Abutting Major Arteries.

Background: This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors after pancreatectomy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer abutting major arteries (BR-A).Methods: We retrospectively investigated relationship between preoperative and intraoperative variables and overall survival (OS) through univariate and multivariate analyses. The cut-off points of preoperative therapy duration and response rates of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels after preoperative therapy were determined through a minimum P-value approach using the log-rank test for OS. Overall survival was compared among patients stratified according to the independent prognostic factors and the presence or absence of pancreatectomy.Results: After pretreatment, 17 patients underwent pancreatectomy and four patients continued chemotherapy without surgery. Multivariate analysis in 17 resected BR-A patients demonstrated decreased serum CA19-9 levels and preoperative therapy duration of ≥4 months were the independent prognostic factors [hazard ratio (HR) 0.01; P = 0.002, HR 0.13; P = 0.02]. Patients who underwent surgery with decreased serum CA19-9 levels after preoperative therapy of ≥4 months had a significantly better prognosis than those without one or both of independent prognostic factors and those who did not undergo surgery (median survival time: not estimated, 23.3 months, 10.5 months, and 10.8 months; P = 0.02, P = 0.004, and P = 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the prognosis did not significantly differ between the patients who underwent surgery without meeting either one or both criteria and those without surgery.Conclusions: Preoperative therapy duration of ≥4 months and decreased serum CA19-9 levels are independent prognostic factors among BR-A patients.

Effect of Radiotherapy in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Pancreatic cancer is a malignant tumor with poor prognosis and bad curative effect. Previous studies did not confirm the role of radiotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). By reviewing new findings reported in recent years, we conducted this study to evaluate the survival impact by comparing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with chemotherapy alone. Methods PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting median overall survival (OS) in patients with BRPC or LAPC treated with neoadjuvant treatment. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) or disease-free survival (DFS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) and R0 resection rate. Results A total of eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. OS (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.91, I2 = 61.7%) and PFS/DFS/RFS (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.91, I2 = 52.3%) are both favored CRT. Although R0 resection rate was increased in CRT group, significant survival benefit of radiotherapy was found in LAPC and low resection rate subgroup in stratification analysis. Regression analysis showed that only tumor resectability was associated with OS. Conclusion For patients with LAPC and who are unlikely to receive resection, neoadjuvant radiotherapy appears to improve OS and PFS/DFS/RFS.

Prognostic impact of aberrant right hepatic artery involvement in patients with pancreatic cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of aberrant right hepatic artery (A-RHA) involvement in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). This study enrolled 474 patients who underwent upfront pancreatectomy or neoadjuvant treatment for resectable (R) or borderline resectable (BR) PC from four institutions. The patients were divided into three groups: A-RHA involvement group (n = 12), patients who had sole A-RHA involvement without major arterial involvement; BR-A group (n = 104), patients who had major arterial involvement; R/BR-PV group (n = 358), others. All patients in the A-RHA involvement group underwent margin-negative resection. The median overall survival of the entire cohort in the A-RHA involvement, R/BR-PV, and BR-A groups was 41.2, 33.5, and 25.2 months, respectively. Although survival in the R/BR-PV group was significantly more favorable than that in the BR-A group (p = 0.0003), no significant difference was observed between the A-RHA involvement group and the R/BR-PV (p = 0.7332) and BR-A (p = 0.1485) groups. The prognosis of patients with PC and sole A-RHA involvement was comparable to that of patients with R/BR-PV.

A striking elevation of CA19-9 after preoperative therapy negates prognostic benefit from radical surgery in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

Identifying patients who can be spared nonbeneficial surgery is crucial, as pancreatic cancer surgery is highly invasive, with substantial negative effects on quality of life. The study objective was to investigate a useful indicator of patients who do not gain prognostic benefit from radical surgery after neoadjuvant therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. We compared factors among 609 patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy during 2005-2019. Patients were divided into a poor-prognosis group (no surgery or postresection recurrence within a year) and a good-prognosis group (no recurrence or recurrence >1year after resection). Patients who experience a recurrence within a year of resection (poor-prognosis group) did no better than patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and progressed but never made it to surgery. The value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy was the most significant indicator to predict the poor prognosis group and the elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (>200 U/mL) identified only poor prognosis group with high specificity of 96.6%. The overall survival of patients with more than 200 of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy was significantly very poor and their 2-year survival rate was only 41.4%. A striking elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after neoadjuvant therapy for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is a good indicator of poor prognosis. Patients with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 >200 U/mL after neoadjuvant therapy should not undergo radical surgery.

Optimal timing of surgery after neoadjuvant treatment in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is standard for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). However, consensus is lacking on the optimal surgical timing for patients with BRPC undergoing NAT. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing NAT for BRPC and suggest optimal resection timing. Prospectively collected data for 282 patients with BRPC between January 2007 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 164 patients who underwent NAT followed by surgery, 45 for chemotherapy only, and 73 for upfront surgery. Among them, 150 patients who underwent R0 or R1 resection following NAT were investigated to identify prognostic factors. Patients receiving NAT followed by surgery showed the best survival (median overall survival [OS]; NAT followed by surgery vs. upfront surgery vs. chemotherapy only; 35 vs. 23 vs. 16 months). In the NAT group, 54 (36.0%) patients received less than 3 months of NAT, 68 (45.3%) received ≥3, <6 months, and 28 (18.7%) received longer than 6 months. Patients receiving ≥3 months of NAT showed an improved OS compared to <3 months (median; not reached vs. 27 months). In the FOLFIRINOX group, patients who received more than eight FOLFIRINOX cycles showed a good prognosis (<6 vs. 6-7 vs. ≥8 cycles; median survival, 26 vs. 41 months vs. not-reached). However, >12 cycles did not carry a survival benefit compared to 8-11 cycles. The optimal resection timing following NAT is once a patient undergoes at least 3 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or at least eight FOLFIRINOX cycles.

Postoperative Adverse Events Following Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgery for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer in a Phase 2 Clinical Trial (Alliance A021501).

Postoperative adverse events (AEs) in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PC) treated with neoadjuvant therapy and pancreatectomy in the national cooperative group setting have not been previously characterized. We conducted a preplanned secondary analysis of patients enrolled on the Alliance A021501 clinical trial to quantify perioperative AE rates. The A021501 phase 2 trial randomized patients with BR-PC to receive 8 doses of mFOLFIRINOX (Arm 1) or 7 doses of mFOLFIRINOX and hypofractionated radiotherapy (Arm 2), followed by pancreatectomy (December 31, 2016 to May 31, 2019). Adverse events were assessed 90 days after pancreatectomy. Of 126 enrolled patients, 51 (40%) underwent pancreatectomy (n = 32, Arm 1; n = 19, Arm 2) at 28 institutions. Five (10%) patients required reoperation within 90 days; 56% of patients (n = 27/48) experienced at least one grade 3 or higher AE (50% vs. 67%, p = 0.37). Ninety-day mortality was 2.0%. Readmission was less frequent in Arm 1 (16% vs. 42%, p = 0.05), but there were no differences between study arms in rates of reoperation (13% vs. 5%), pancreatic fistula or intra-abdominal abscess requiring drainage (9% vs. 16%), or wound infection (6% vs. 16%). Pancreatic fistula or intra-abdominal abscess requiring drainage was associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy (p = 0.012). No difference in overall survival was observed based on occurrence of postoperative AEs (hazard ratio = 1.1; 95% confidence interval 0.5-2.6). In this multicenter study, rates of postoperative AEs were consistent with those previously reported. Multimodality trials of preoperative therapy for BR-PC may be performed in the cooperative group setting with careful quality assurance and safety monitoring. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02839343.

Prognostic model for resected borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

The current AJCC 8th has been reported to have a poor ability to predict the prognosis in patients with resected borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and locally advanced pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study was aimed to develop an improved prognostic model by incorporating pathology and parameters of biologic response (BR). A retrospective cohort study was conducted including patients who underwent curative-intent surgery following chemotherapy. We developed a modified ypT staging system and incorporated the BR, involving normalization of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and reduction in the maximum standardized uptake value simultaneously after chemotherapy. The prognostic performance of the current pathologic system, modified pathologic system, and newly developed system incorporating pathology and BR were compared. In this study, 171 patients underwent surgery following chemotherapy. The modified T stage, which unified ypT2 and ypT3, demonstrated improved prognostic performance than the current staging system (area under the curve: 0.706 vs. 0.661). Biologic unresponsiveness was an independent prognostic factor for worse survival (hazard ratio 2.31, 95% confidence interval 1.50-3.55, P<0.001). The modified pathology with BR system demonstrated the highest discriminative ability in predicting 5-year overall survival than the current pathologic system (area under the curve: 0.785 vs. 0.661, P=0.010) and modified pathologic staging system (area under the curve: 0.785 vs. 0.706, P=0.002). The prognostic model, incorporating modified ypT staging and elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels and maximum standardized uptake value simultaneously, demonstrated improved results in predicting oncologic outcomes for patients who underwent surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Artificial Intelligence-based Segmentation of Residual Pancreatic Cancer in Resection Specimens Following Neoadjuvant Treatment (ISGPP-2): International Improvement and Validation Study.

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become routine in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Pathologists examine pancreatic cancer resection specimens to evaluate the effect of NAT. However, an automated scoring system to objectively quantify residual pancreatic cancer (RPC) is currently lacking. Herein, we developed and validated the first automated segmentation model using artificial intelligence techniques to objectively quantify RPC. Digitized histopathological tissue slides were included from resected pancreatic cancer specimens from 14 centers in 7 countries in Europe, North America, Australia, and Asia. Four different scanner types were used: Philips (56%), Hamamatsu (27%), 3DHistech (10%), and Leica (7%). Regions of interest were annotated and classified as cancer, non-neoplastic pancreatic ducts, and others. A U-Net model was trained to detect RPC. Validation consisted of by-scanner internal-external cross-validation. Overall, 528 unique hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) slides from 528 patients were included. In the individual Philips, Hamamatsu, 3DHistech, and Leica scanner cross-validations, mean F1 scores of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.84), 0.80 (0.78-0.83), 0.76 (0.65-0.78), and 0.71 (0.65-0.78) were achieved, respectively. In the meta-analysis of the cross-validations, the mean F1 score was 0.78 (0.71-0.84). A final model was trained on the entire data set. This ISGPP model is the first segmentation model using artificial intelligence techniques to objectively quantify RPC following NAT. The internally-externally cross-validated model in this study demonstrated robust performance in detecting RPC in specimens. The ISGPP model, now made publically available, enables automated RPC segmentation and forms the basis for objective NAT response evaluation in pancreatic cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy in gastrointestinal cancer treatment

Background. In recent decades, immunotherapy has become a topical area of research in the complex treatment of oncological diseases. A significant achievement in the immunotherapy of oncological diseases was the discovery of immune checkpoint proteins, which are effective inhibitors of the immune response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for the treatment of certain gastrointestinal malignancies. However, the clinical efficacy of ICIs monotherapy remains low. To improve the outcome of treatment, numerous studies are conducted in which immunotherapy is combined with other standard methods of anticancer treatment. Radiation therapy (RT) may enhance the antitumor immune response when combined with ICIs and is worth considering when combined with immunotherapy. The effectiveness of the combined strategy is actively being investigated in clinical trials. Purpose – to highlight the latest achievements in the field of combined use of immunotherapy with ICIs and RT in malignant neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Materials and methods. Data searches for the review were conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The data of works published in 2013-2023 were analyzed and systematized. Results and discussion. The rationality of the combination of RT and immunotherapy was substantiated. The results of the combined use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and immunotherapy with ICIs in patients with resectable esophageal cancer and combined treatment in patients with advanced disease are analyzed. The clinical results of the use of ICIs in combination with RT or CRT in patients with gastric cancer and the combination of ICIs and RT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are presented. The clinical effects of adding ICIs to neoadjuvant RT or CRT in patients with locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and the results of trials of a combined strategy in patients with advanced disease are characterized. The clinical efficacy of the combined approach in locally advanced rectal cancer, which is a routine area of RT application, and in metastatic disease is reviewed. The results of small studies of combined treatment involving patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are presented. Conclusions. Over the past decade, research in the field of immunotherapy for gastrointestinal tumors has increased significantly. Based on the synergistic effects of radiation therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, the combination of these therapeutic approaches is increasingly being tested in gastrointestinal cancer to improve treatment outcomes. Published studies have shown encouraging results with satisfactory toxicity. However, most clinical trials are retrospective, non-comparative phase I/II trials and are limited to a small number of patients. The results of these studies can serve as a basis for conducting multicenter prospective studies with large sample sizes to confirm the effectiveness of combined therapy.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Localized Pancreatic Cancer: Is More Better?

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) poses a significant challenge in oncology due to its advanced stage upon diagnosis and limited treatment options. Surgical resection, the primary curative approach, often results in poor long-term survival rates, leading to the exploration of alternative strategies like neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). While NAT aims to enhance resectability and overall survival, there appears to be potential for improvement, prompting consideration of alternative neoadjuvant strategies integrating full-dose chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in TNT approaches. TNT integrates chemotherapy and radiotherapy prior to surgery, potentially improving margin-negative resection rates and enabling curative resection for locally advanced cases. The lingering question: is more always better? This article categorizes TNT strategies into six main groups based on radiotherapy (RT) techniques: (1) conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT), (2) the Dutch PREOPANC approach, (3) hypofractionated ablative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HFA-IMRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) techniques, which further divide into (4) non-ablative SBRT, (5) nearly ablative SBRT, and (6) adaptive ablative SBRT. A comprehensive analysis of the literature on TNT is provided for both borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), with detailed sections for each.

Protocol digest of a randomized phase III trial comparing S-1-based chemoradiotherapy with/without nivolumab for unresectable locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: JCOG1908E (PENETRATE).

Pancreatic cancer remains a highly lethal disease with a 5-year survival proportion of <10%. Chemoradiotherapy is a treatment option for unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) or borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic cancer, but its efficacy is not sufficient. Induction of the synergistic effect of irradiation and immune checkpoint inhibitors can be an attractive strategy. An open-label randomized phase III trial has been conducted since October 2020 to confirm the superiority of nivolumab plus S-1-based chemoradiotherapy over S-1-based chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with UR-LA or BR pancreatic cancer. A total of 216 patients will be enrolled in 14 institutions within 3.5years. The primary endpoint of the safety run-in part is dose-limiting toxicity, and that of the phase III part is overall survival. This trial was registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCT2080225361 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2080225361).

An Evolving Paradigm in Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Current Strategies and Opportunities for the Future

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), a cancer of the gastrointestinal tract, has been increasing in incidence, with an estimated doubling worldwide over the past two decades. Despite increases in awareness and innovations in genomics and drug discovery, 5-year survival remains low, at only 10%. This is in part owing to the majority of patients being diagnosed at the advanced stage of the disease, in addition to chemotherapy recalcitrant disease. Surgical resection is necessary for a potential cure, however, this is only possible for the 10% of patients who present with resectable disease and potentially for those with borderline resectable disease. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer accounts for approximately 30% of those with PDAC and most of those patients are often precluded from curative intent surgery due to major vascular invasion and local infiltration into peri-pancreatic soft tissue. In cases of locally advanced disease, induction chemotherapy is often used, identifying the subgroup of patients more suited for local treatments and those who may later develop metastases. The treatment regimens used for patients with locally advanced PDAC are often extrapolated from trials involving patients with metastatic disease. In some cases, responses to neoadjuvant therapy have allowed for surgical resection, albeit these aggressive resections were associated with significant morbidity. There is growing interest in identifying the optimal neoadjuvant treatment for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced PDAC (LAPC) in an effort to improve outcomes. Here we review therapeutic strategies for borderline resectable and locally advanced PDAC, with a focus on novel systemic therapy regimens, chemoradiation, and different radiation modalities.

Clinical Outcomes of Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Clinical outcomes of surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have not been investigated for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), despite well-established outcomes in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with LAPC who underwent curative resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma between January 2017 and December 2020. Among 1,358 patients, 260 underwent surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among 356 LAPC patients, 98 (27.5%) and 147 (35.1%) of 418 BRPC patients underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Compared to resectable pancreatic cancer (resectable PC) with upfront surgery, both LAPC and BRPC exhibited higher rates of venous resection (28.6% vs. 49.0% vs. 4.0%), arterial resection (30.6% vs. 6.8% vs. 0.5%) and greater estimated blood loss (260.5 vs. 213.1 vs. 70.4 mL). However, hospital stay, readmission rates, and postoperative pancreatic fistula rates (grade B or C) did not differ significantly between LAPC, BRPC, and resectable PC. Overall and relapse-free survival did not differ significantly between LAPC and BRPC patients. The median overall survival was 37.3 months for LAPC and 37.0 months for BRPC. The median relapse-free survival was 22.7 months for LAPC and 26.0 months for BRPC. Overall survival time and postoperative complications in LAPC patients who underwent curative resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed similar results to those of BRPC patients. Further research is needed to identify specific sub-populations of LAPC patients who benefit most from conversion surgery and to minimize postoperative complications.