Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Research Articles

Orthobiologic therapies delay the need for hip arthroplasty in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head: A systematic review and survival analysis.

The aim of this systematic review and survival analysis was to quantify the benefits of orthobiologic augmentation therapies for the treatment of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head and identify the most effective approach to delay the need for total hip arthroplasty (THA). A systematic review of the literature was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane on clinical studies on orthobiologic therapies used alone or as an augmentation to core decompression or other procedures to address hip AVN. A qualitative analysis of the different biological therapies applied was performed. Afterward, the results of these procedures were quantitatively analysed to document their survivorship from THA compared to treatment groups without orthobiologics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for all studies and then by categorising orthobiologics into treatment subgroups. A total of 106 studies were included (4505 patients). Different orthobiologic approaches have been evaluated: cell-based therapies including bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), or other bioactive molecules applied in the osteonecrotic area or as intra-arterial injections. The survival analysis at 120 months documented a higher (p < 0.0005) cumulative survivorship with orthobiologics (69.4%) compared to controls (48.5%). The superiority was shown specifically for BMAC (p < 0.0005), BM-MSCs (p < 0.0005), intra-arterial (p < 0.0005) and PRP (p = 0.011) approaches, but the direct comparison of these approaches with their controls confirmed benefits only for BMAC (p < 0.0005). This systematic review and survival analysis demonstrated that orthobiologics have the potential to improve survivorship in patients affected by hip AVN. In particular, the specific analysis of different orthobiologic products supported relevant benefits for BMAC augmentation in terms of survival from the need for THA, while no clear benefits were confirmed for other orthobiologics. Level III.

Management of knee osteoarthritis using bone marrow aspirate concentrate: a systematic review.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common degenerative joint condition and a major cause of disability in the general population. Recent published literature identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Orthobiological therapies try to regenerate articular cartilage and stop the progression of the degenerative lesion. Intra-articular injections of biological derivates have been increasingly used in the last decade. The indications for the use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) are still unclear. We systematically reviewed the current literature on BMAC in the management of knee OA, giving an update on the current indications for the selection of the ideal patient and the preparations and efficacy of BMAC compared to other biological alternatives. BMAC is a valuable source of mesenchymal stem cells, offering potential benefits in attenuating the inflammatory pathway associated with knee OA. Intra-articular injection of BMAC has shown effectiveness in clinical trials improving functional outcomes of knee OA patients. The superiority of BMAC over other orthobiological treatments cannot be assessed because of conflicting results.

One-Step Cartilage Repair of Full-Thickness Knee Chondral Lesions Using a Hyaluronic Acid-Based Scaffold Embedded With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: Long-term Outcomes After Mean Follow-up Duration of 14 Years.

One-step cell-based techniques of cartilage repair that lead to restoration of durable chondral tissue and long-term maintenance of joint function are cost-effective and ideal for routine use. To examine the long-term clinical outcomes, after a mean follow-up duration of 14 years, of cartilage repair in the knee using a hyaluronic acid-based scaffold in association with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (HA-BMAC) and to evaluate the effect of age, lesion characteristics, and associated treatments on the outcome of this cartilage repair method. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Patients were followed prospectively for a mean duration of 14.0 years after undergoing treatment of knee full-thickness articular cartilage injury using HA-BMAC. Clinical evaluation consisted of the patient-reported scoring tools of the visual analog scale and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, which were completed preoperatively and at the time of final follow-up. A total of 26 patients with a mean age of 48.3 years (17 male, 9 female) and median chondral lesion size of 6.6 cm2 (range, 1-27 cm2) were followed prospectively. There were 3 treatment failures, and 1 patient who underwent medial compartment unicompartmental arthroplasty 12 years after HA-BMAC treatment of patellar chondral injury. Of the 22 remaining patients, after a mean final follow-up duration of 14.0 years (range, 12-16 years), the median visual analog scale score of 0.6 was significantly decreased from the preoperative median score of 5.0 (P < .001). The median Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain (92), Symptoms (86), Activities of Daily Living (96), Sports (85), and Quality of Life (88) subscale values were all increased compared with the preoperative scores (P≤ .001). There was no correlation of clinical outcome score and body mass index. One-step cartilage repair of full-thickness chondral defects in the knee using an HA-BMAC led to successful long-term clinical outcomes and maintenance of joint junction after a mean follow-up duration of 14 years. Long-term clinical success in active, nonobese patients has been uniformly demonstrated across a wide range of patient ages and lesion types, including cases of multicompartment involvement, treatment of associated conditions, and large or bipolar chondral lesions.

Osteochondral Lesion of Talus: Role of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate and Microfracture—What Does the Current Literature Say?

Osteochondral Lesion of Talus: Role of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate and Microfracture—What Does the Current Literature Say?

Surgical Applications for Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate

Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) is an autologous orthobiologic agent that may be of benefit in specific surgical scenarios. Composed of elements isolated from bone marrow, including mesenchymal stromal cells, bone marrow–derived platelets, red and white blood cells, and hematopoietic precursors, BMAC has gained appeal for its potential to slow the progression of chondral degeneration, improve function, and provide symptomatic relief. BMAC is typically prepared during the final stages of a surgical procedure, beginning with bone marrow aspirate harvested from the iliac crest, distal femur, body of the ilium, or proximal humerus and then centrifuged to yield concentrated marrow cells. In a published technique for BMAC use in arthroscopic acetabular labral repair, 120 mL of BMA is harvested from the body of the ilium and then centrifuged to yield approximately 4 to 6 mL of BMAC. The biologic activity of BMAC is 2-fold: (1) mesenchymal stromal cells are pluripotent stem cells that stimulate a robust tissue response for cartilage repair through their potential to differentiate into chondrocytes that induce chondrogenesis, and (2) bone marrow–derived platelets produce growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines that promote collagen synthesis, wound healing, and suppression of proinflammatory cytokines. To date, BMAC has shown promise as an efficacious adjuvant therapy. When comparing patient outcomes, studies have found that patients receiving BMAC achieved lower rates of revision rotator cuff repair, higher functional outcome scores following arthroscopic acetabular labral repair, and significant reductions in pain levels in the context of knee cartilage defects. These findings, however, must be interpreted with caution, as there remains a paucity of randomized controlled trials investigating the mid- and long-term efficacy of BMAC. Overall, as treatments for patients with both progressive chondral degeneration and acute orthopaedic injuries continue to evolve, BMAC serves as promising orthobiologic therapy to improve outcomes.

Olecranon Stress Fracture Treated with Headless Compression Screws and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Augmentation: A Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature

Olecranon Stress Fracture Treated with Headless Compression Screws and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Augmentation: A Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature

A Comparison of Functional Outcomes in Rotator Cuff Repairs Using Adjunctive Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate vs. Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate With Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Regenerative medicine, specifically bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), has become a novel adjunct that orthopedic surgeons have started to use with surgical rotator cuff repairs (RCR). Thus, we are conducting this systematic review to determine if either RCRs with BMAC alone or with BMAC and PRP result in superior functional outcomes. We conducted a comprehensive search using five databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane. After duplicates were removed, 1205 studies were screened by title and abstract using Rayyan, resulting in three included studies (one BMAC with PRP and two BMAC only). Only studies that reported functional outcomes using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score and the University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score were included. Changes in assessment scores from baseline to follow-up evaluation were quantified using the effect size and used in the meta-analysis for each group. Interpretation of treatment efficacy was represented using Cohen's d. The effect size of BMAC with PRP (Cohen's d = 2.19) was not significantly different (p = 0.76) from that of BMAC alone (Cohen's d = 2.35). Between-group differences in functional outcomes were Cohen's d = 0.16, which was not significant. Given the lack of superiority and the small sample size, more research is required before a conclusion can be drawn as to the benefits of combining PRP with BMAC for RCR. If functional outcomes are the same, using BMAC alone as an adjunct may be optimal to reduce resources used and cost. Future studies should be conducted with a larger pool as our primary limitation is that only three studies were included.

Effect of Cellular Dosage of Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate on the Radiological Outcomes in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study.

Knee osteoarthritis(KOA), a chronic degenerative disease, significantly impairs quality of life due to pain and mobility limitations. Traditional treatments focus on symptom management without addressing the underlying disease progression, leading to a growing interest in regenerative medicine approaches. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), rich in mesenchymal stem cells and growth factors, has shown potential for cartilage repair and symptom relief in KOA. Despite promising outcomes, the optimal BMAC dosage for knee OA treatment remains undetermined. This study aims to evaluate the radiological outcomes of varying BMAC dosages in knee OA treatment. This prospective controlled dose-escalation study involved 75 patients with early-stage knee OA, categorized into three groups based on BMAC dosage administered 10x106 cells (low-dose group), 50×106 cells (medium-dose group), or 100x106 cells (high-dose group). All the patients underwent a single intra-articular injection of BMAC and were monitored over a year. The primary outcomes include magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART 2.0) score to assess the cartilage. We noted significant improvement in the overall MOCART score (p=0.027) and subchondral change sub-score (p=0.048) and defect filling sub-score (p=0.025) in the medium- and high-dose cohorts compared to the low-dose cohort at 1year follow-up. Although we noted positive correlation between the clinical and radiological outcome (r=0.43), we did not find any significant different in the clinical outcome between the treatment groups. BMAC for OA knee resulted in significant improvement in the radiological scores compared to the baseline. Medium and high doses of BMAC result in significantly higher radiological scores compared to low-dose BMAC at 1year. However, the radiological improvement did not translate into functional improvement, irrespective of the dosage administered at 1year. Further research is necessary on the long-term outcomes to understand and optimize the dosing strategy based on clinico-radiological results.

Autologous Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate (BMAC) Therapy for Primary Knee Osteoarthritis-An Observational and Dose Escalation Study.

Anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties maximize the therapeutic potential of bone marrow aspiration concentrate (BMAC) in osteoarthritis (OA) knee. There is a lack of studies to standardize the treatment procedure to make the studies done across various centers comparable to understand the lacunae better and develop further the deficiency in our understanding of BMAC for OA knee. We aimed to assess the degree of pain relief, functional outcome, and cartilage thickness with different doses of BMAC in primary OA knee. A single-centered prospective observational study was conducted with 80 patients of OA knee who were divided into 4 groups where group A (n = 20), group B (n = 20), group C (n = 20), and group D (n = 20) received intra-articular 1, 2, 5million BMAC cells per kg body weight, and intra-articular saline, respectively. All patients were followed up with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores both pre and post-procedurally at 1, 3, 6, and 12months follow-up. The study found no significant differences in demographics or co-morbidities across four participant groups (A, B, C, D). However, clinical outcomes varied markedly: Groups B and C showed significant improvements in pain perception (VAS scores), knee function, and quality of life (KOOS and WOMAC scores), while Group A showed marginal or non-significant changes, and Group D exhibited no significant improvements. These findings suggest that treatments in Groups B and C reached the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, significantly enhancing patient-reported outcomes. A dose of 2million BMAC cells per kg body weight for knee OA serves as the better regenerative modality of choice in cartilage regeneration. With our dose-escalation study, we would be able to standardize the treatment procedure and enable global comparison of the treatment method across various regions of the world.

Core Decompression with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Implantation in Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head with a Minimum of 2-year Follow-up - A Pilot Study.

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), resulting from impaired blood supply to the head of the femur, presents a significant challenge to clinicians due to its debilitating nature. Conservative treatment often offers insufficient pain relief and debilitating functional outcomes which necessitate alternative therapies. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), a potent orthobiologics and rich in mesenchymal stromal cells and growth factors, holds good promise as the minimally invasive procedure for ONFH. With the preceding research suggesting clinical and functional efficacy, we assessed the therapeutic effectiveness of BMAC in ONFH management in joint preservation. A prospective cohort study was conducted with 20 patients suffering from ONFH who failed to respond to 6 months of conservative treatment. A uniform surgical procedure was performed by a single surgeon, involving bone marrow extraction from the anterior iliac crest and subsequent processing into an 8-10 mL of BMAC concentrate. The BMAC was then injected into the implanted into the decompressed femoral head. The post-operative protocol comprised weight-bearing mobilization, physiotherapy, and a 4-week NSAID-free regimen. Outcome measures included pain scores, hip function, knee symptoms, sports activities, patient satisfaction, and recommendation of the procedure. Of the 20 patients suffering from ONFH, primarily the left side, most of whom were at stage 2b, significant pain reduction and functional improvement were observed over 24 months. The mean pain score decreased from 9.00 to 3.55, while the hip function score increased from 46.12 to 88.60. However, some patients encountered complications such as symptom recurrence (5%), disease progression (10%), and persistent pain (5%). Core decompression with BMAC implantation emerges as a promising, effective, and safe treatment for ONFH with better costeffectiveness and minimal side effects, making it a feasible treatment alternative.

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Pain: A Scoping Review.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an emerging biological intervention for osteoarthritis (OA), yet the outcomes remain uncertain. The purpose of this study was to review current literature regarding the use of PRP for knee and hip OA. Recent systematic reviews have found significant clinical improvements in outcomes after the administration of PRP compared to hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with knee OA. One of these reviews included bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) as a comparison group and found no significant differences in outcomes between PRP and BMAC. Currently, the literature is lacking on whether leukocyte-rich or leukocyte-poor PRP is superior in patients with knee OA. The literature on PRP for hip OA has not provided consistent results as it has for the knee. Two recent systematic reviews evaluated RCTs for patients undergoing treatment with either PRP or HA for hip OA and found no significant differences in clinical outcomes between groups at final follow-up. Current literature regarding the association between OA grade and PRP efficacy has found varying results. The use of PRP injections in the treatment of knee OA appears to be favorable, resulting in clinically comparable or superior outcomes compared to other injection treatments. However, the clinical efficacy of PRP injections in hip OA is far less consistent. Evidence is lacking to suggest that the presence of leukocytes significantly influences clinical outcomes. Further randomized controlled trials on larger cohorts, with longer follow-up, and with comparable formulations are required before recommendations can be made regarding use of PRP for hip OA, the effect of leukocyte concentration, and clinical efficacy based on OA grade.

Comparative single-cell transcriptional and proteomic atlas of clinical-grade injectable mesenchymal source tissues.

Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (ADSVF) are the most marketed stem cell therapies to treat a variety of conditions in the general population and elite athletes. Both tissues have been used interchangeably clinically even though their detailed composition, heterogeneity, and mechanisms of action have neither been rigorously inventoried nor compared. This lack of information has prevented investigations into ideal dosages and has facilitated anecdata and misinformation. Here, we analyzed single-cell transcriptomes, proteomes, and flow cytometry profiles from paired clinical-grade BMAC and ADSVF. This comparative transcriptional atlas challenges the prevalent notion that there is one therapeutic cell type present in both tissues. We also provide data of surface markers that may enable isolation and investigation of cell (sub)populations. Furthermore, the proteome atlas highlights intertissue and interpatient heterogeneity of injected proteins with potentially regenerative or immunomodulatory capacities. An interactive webtool is available online.

T cells and macrophages jointly modulate osteogenesis of mesenchymal stromal cells.

Approximately 5%-10% of fractures go on to delayed healing and nonunion, posing significant clinical, economic, and social challenges. Current treatment methods involving open bone harvesting and grafting are associated with considerable pain and potential morbidity at the donor site. Hence, there is growing interest in minimally invasive approaches such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), which contains mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), macrophages (Mφ), and T cells. However, the use of cultured or activated cells for treatment is not yet FDA-approved in the United States, necessitating further exploration of optimal cell types and proportions for effective bone formation. As our understanding of osteoimmunology advances, it has become apparent that factors from anti-inflammatory Mφ (M2) promote bone formation by MSCs. Additionally, M2 Mφ promote T helper 2 (Th2) cells and Treg cells, both of which enhance bone formation. In this study, we investigated the interactions among MSCs, Mφ, and T cells in bone formation and explored the potential of subsets of BMAC. Coculture experiments were conducted using primary MSCs, Mφ, and CD4+ T cells at specific ratios. Our results indicate that nonactivated T cells had no direct influence on osteogenesis by MSCs, while coculturing MSCs with Mφ and T cells at a ratio of 1:5:10 positively impacted bone formation. Furthermore, higher numbers of T cells led to increased M2 polarization and a higher proportion of Th2 cells in the early stages of coculture. These findings suggest the potential for enhancing bone formation by adjusting immune and mesenchymal cell ratios in BMAC. By understanding the interactions and effects of immune cells on bone formation, we can develop more effective strategies and protocols for treating bone defects and nonunions. Further studies are needed to investigate these interactions in vivo and explore additional factors influencing MSC-based therapies.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Augmentation With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate, Demineralized Bone Matrix, and Suture Tape Shows No Difference in Outcomes—But Faster Functional Recovery—Versus Non-augmented Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PurposeTo compare outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), demineralized bone matrix (DBM), and suture tape augmentation (STA) vs. ACLR without biologic augmentation or STA. MethodsA prospective randomized controlled trial at a single institution was performed to compare ACLR with BMAC, DBM, and STA (Group A) vs. ACLR without biologic or STA (Group NA). One hundred patients were required. Skeletally mature patients <25 years old received quadriceps tendon autografts, while patients ≥25 years old received allograft ACLR with an all-inside technique. Concomitant meniscal pathologies were included. Primary outcomes compared were range-of-motion (ROM), limb symmetry, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Secondary outcomes included radiographic outcomes and surgical complications. Univariate and mixed-model regression analysis were used to compare outcomes. ResultsFifty-nine patients were included (Group A: 29 patients, 11 females, 38%; Group NA: 30 patients, 15 females, 50%). Early range-of-motion at 6 weeks (125° vs 109° flexion, p<0.0001) and limb symmetry testing at 12 weeks (80.6 % vs. 36.7% [Delta 43.9%], p<0.001) were significantly improved in Group A. At two years, International Knee Documentation (IKDC) scores were similar (91.1 ± 12.7 vs. 85.3 ± 10.8, p=0.109). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS) Quality of Life (QOL) scores were significantly enhanced in Group A (85.2 ± 20.9 vs. 72.1 ± 20.4, p=0.042). Twenty-two patients (12 Group A, 10 Group NA) underwent CT scans at 6-months to compare bone tunnel healing. Overall, the mean increase in bone tunnel diameter was significantly smaller in Group A vs. NA. No difference in graft re-ruptures or re-operations was observed. Seven of 59 patients (11.9%) underwent re-operation for stiffness (A: 3 (10%) vs. NA: 4 (13%), p=1.0). ConclusionThere were no differences in IKDC scores between groups at 2-year follow-up. Functional outcomes including early range-of-motion and limb symmetry were significantly improved in patients who received ACLR with BMAC, DBM, and STA. ACLRACLR.ACLR

Poster 284: The Effect of Pressurized Carbon Dioxide Lavage on Osteochondral Allograft Preparation: A Comparative Study

Objectives: Osteochondral allografts (OCA) transplantation is often utilized for treating osteochondral lesions of the knee due to limited cartilage regenerative capabilities. The use of concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA) has gained traction as a method to enhance OCA incorporation and healing. Pulse lavage and pressurized carbon dioxide lavage are cleaning methods used during OCA preparation to rid native marrow elements and improve graft porosity, but their isolated and combined effects are not fully understood. This study aimed to assess the impact of incorporating pressurized carbon dioxide lavage as an adjunct to pulse lavage during OCA preparation. Our hypothesis was that adding pressurized carbon dioxide lavage would enhance the OCA absorption capacity for liquid-based materials like cBMA. Methods: OCA plugs were harvested from medial hemi-condyles. The plugs were divided into two groups: one group underwent pulse lavage alone, and the other group underwent pulse lavage followed by pressurized carbon dioxide lavage (sequential group). The plugs were weighed before and after each cleaning step and a liquid dye solution with consistency similar to cBMA was added by dripping over the cancellous portion of the graft. Next, the liquid content was determined by centrifugation and spectrophotometry. Results were analyzed statistically. Results: Thirty-four OCA plugs with a 14 to 18 mm diameter were harvested. After the cleaning phase, the sequential group showed a significant weight reduction of 107 ± 21.92% (p &lt; 0.0001) and subsequent weight gain of 96.32 ± 18.99% (p &lt; 0.0001) after the cleaning and dye-dripping procedures. In contrast, the pulse lavage-only group exhibited minimal weight loss and a small weight gain of 10.55 ± 3.86% after the dye-dripping procedure. Conclusions: Adding pressurized carbon dioxide lavage to reduce marrow elements and improve graft porosity significantly improved the OCA cleaning process and created more vacant space enhancing OCA absorption capacity for orthobiologic agents such as cBMA. The study findings highlight the potential of incorporating pressurized carbon dioxide lavage as an adjunct to pulse lavage during OCA preparation. These findings may contribute to the surgical procedure of incorporating cBMA or other orthobiologics to promote the integration and healing of OCA plugs.

Short-Term Clinical Results of Single-Injection Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) as a Therapeutic Option/Tool in Knee Osteoarthritis

Short-Term Clinical Results of Single-Injection Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) as a Therapeutic Option/Tool in Knee Osteoarthritis

Effectiveness and Complications of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis of Kellgren-Lawrence Grades II-III.

This study aimed to identify the effectiveness and potential complications on the harvest site and knee of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) treatment of patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grades II-III knee osteoarthritis (OA) over a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. This study retrospectively evaluated data from 231 patients (285 knees) with knee OA treated with BMAC articular injection at a single center from August 2023 to October 2023. The inclusion criteria were a longstanding knee pain unresponsive to conservative treatments for at least 6 weeks with K-L grades II-III OA. The exclusion criteria were age of <40 years or >80 years, previous knee surgery, rheumatological or other systemic disease, malignancy, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, or infections. Bone marrow was aspirated from the anterior iliac crest and concentrated by the single-spin centrifugation technique. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and Knee Society Score were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications associated with harvest and injection sites were evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 7.2 months (range: 6-8 months). The pretreatment VAS pain score decreased from 4.3 to 0.4 points at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). Pretreatment Knee Society knee and function scores were improved from 86.9 to 98.1 (p < 0.05) and from 68.4 to 83.3 points (p < 0.05), respectively. A total of 15 complications (5.3%, 15/285) were observed, including 3 hematomas, 2 numbness, 2 contact dermatitis, and 1 superficial infection in the harvest site and 4 mild and moderate swelling and 3 severe swelling and pain in the injection site. BMAC is a reliable and effective treatment for patients with K-L grades II-III knee OA, but the orthopedic surgeon should consider that bleeding tendency by heparin causes severe joint swelling and pain after intra-articular knee injection.

Increased Cellular Dosage of Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate Does Not Translate to Increased Clinical Effectiveness in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Phase I Dose Escalation Study.

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA), a chronic degenerative disease, significantly impairs quality of life due to pain and mobility limitations. Traditional treatments focus on symptom management without addressing the underlying disease progression, leading to a growing interest in regenerative medicine approaches. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), rich in mesenchymal stem cells and growth factors, has shown potential for cartilage repair and symptom relief in KOA. Despite promising outcomes, the optimal BMAC dosage for knee OA treatment remains undetermined. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of varying BMAC dosages in knee OA treatment. This prospective controlled dose-escalation study involved 75 patients with early-stage knee OA, categorized into three groups based on BMAC dosage administered 10 × 106 cells (low-dose group), 50 × 106 cells (medium-dose group), or 100 × 106 cells (high-dose group). All the patients underwent a single intra-articular injection of BMAC and were monitored over a year. The primary outcomes include Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for joint function recorded at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12months post-intervention. Adverse events were also documented. Significant clinical improvements in VAS and KOOS scores were noted across all groups at all time points compared to the baseline. However, these improvements did not significantly differ between dosage groups throughout the follow-up period. Adverse effects were minimal and primarily consisted of transient post-injection pain and effusion, with no dose-dependent increase in complications. BMAC treatment for knee OA is safe and demonstrates potential for significant pain relief and functional improvement, irrespective of the dosage administered within the tested range. The lack of significant differences among varying dosages suggests a plateau in therapeutic efficacy beyond a certain threshold. Further research is necessary on the long-term outcomes to optimize the dosing strategy.

BLASTING BMAC: A NOVEL THERAPY TO IMPROVE HEALING IN FUSION SURGERY

IntroductionFusion represents an effective treatment option in patients affected by end-stage arthritis. To minimise the risk of non-union following fusion, biological preparations such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) are commonly used intra-operatively. Mechanotransduction represents an emerging field of research whereby physical stimuli can be used to modulate the behaviour and differentiation of cells. Blast waves (a subtype of shock waves) are one such physical stimulus. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the osteogenic potential of BMAC can be enhanced using a blast wave, and thus improve its efficacy in fusion surgery.MethodsHuman BMAC samples were obtained from three healthy patients and exposed to a single blast wave (peak overpressure= 50psi), before being placed in a suspension of mesenchymal stem cells, to represent the biological environment of the fusion site. Three test groups were used: MSC (the experimental control); MSC + BMAC; MSC + BMAC + blast wave. Calcium mineralisation assays were performed on the MSCs on Day 7 and 14 to assess for osteoblastic transformation.ResultsCalcium mineralisation on Day 7 was significantly increased in the MSC + BMAC group compared to the MSC group (mean percentage change 42.12 vs 0.0, p=0.012). The MSC + BMAC + blast wave group also demonstrated significantly increased levels compared to the MSC + BMAC group (84.56 vs. 42.14, p = 0.039). The difference in calcium mineralisation between the MSC and MSC + BMAC + blast wave groups was strongly significant (0.00 vs. 84.56, p = 0.003).ConclusionExposure of BMAC to a single blast wave enhances its osteogenic potential. This represents a potential novel way to improve healing following fusion surgery and reduce the rates of non-union.

A New Approach to Postoperative Rehabilitation following Mosaicplasty and Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate (BMAC) Augmentation.

Chondral defects in the knee present a significant challenge due to their limited self-healing capacity, often leading to joint degeneration and functional disability. Current treatments, including surgical approaches like mosaicplasty and regenerative therapies such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) augmentation, aim to address these defects and improve patient outcomes. This study conducted a single-center, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment approaches and rehabilitation protocols for chondral defects. Thirty-seven subjects presenting with symptomatic chondral or osteochondral defects (>3 cm2) in the weight-bearing region of the femoral condyle were partitioned into three groups, and underwent mosaicplasty with or without BMAC augmentation, followed by either a 6-week or 12-week rehabilitation program. Group 1 (n = 10) received mosaicplasty combined with BMAC augmentation and engaged in a twelve-week two-phase rehabilitation protocol. Group 2 (n = 15) underwent mosaicplasty alone and participated in the same twelve-week two-phase rehabilitation regimen. Meanwhile, Group 3 (n = 12) underwent mosaicplasty and underwent a shorter six-week one-phase rehabilitation program. Clinical assessments were performed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, goniometry for the knee's range of motion (ROM), manual muscle testing (MMT) for quadricep strength, and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index (WOMAC) for functional evaluation in three test phases. Significant differences in WOMAC scale scores were observed between the three groups at the intermediate (F(2, 34) = 5.24, p < 0.010) and final (F(2, 34) = 111, p < 0.000) stages, with post hoc Tukey tests revealing variations shared among all three groups. The between-group analysis of the VAS scale demonstrated no statistically significant difference initially (F(2, 34) = 0.18, p < 0.982), but significant differences emerged following the intermediate (F(2, 34) = 11.40, p < 0.000) and final assessments (F(2, 34) = 59.87, p < 0.000), with post hoc Tukey tests revealing specific group variations, notably between Group 1 and both Group 2 and Group 3, and also between Group 3 and Group 2. The between-group analysis of quadricep muscle strength using MMT scores revealed no statistically significant differences initially (F(2, 34) = 0.376, p < 0.689) or following the intermediate assessment (F(2, 34) = 2.090, p < 0.139). The one-way ANOVA analysis showed no significant difference in the knee ROM initially (F(2, 34) = 1.037, p < 0.366), but significant differences emerged following intermediate (F(2, 34) = 9.38, p < 0.001) and final assessments (F(2, 34) = 11.60, p < 0.000). Post hoc Tukey tests revealed significant differences between Groups 1 and 2, Groups 1 and 3, and Groups 2 and 3 at intermediate and final assessments. The patients who received BMAC augmentation and completed a 12-week rehabilitation protocol had significantly better outcomes in pain relief, knee function, and ROM when compared to those who did not receive BMAC augmentation or those who completed a shorter rehabilitation period. Our findings suggest that combining mosaicplasty with BMAC augmentation and a comprehensive rehabilitation program can lead to superior clinical outcomes for patients with chondral defects in the knee.