--Many ripe fruits contain chemicals that presumably protect them against attacks by frugivores that do not disperse seeds. These secondary metabolites may be generally toxic, representing an evolutionary compromise between defense from pathogens and attraction of seed dispersers (the General Toxicity hypothesis). Alternatively, they may be nontoxic to seed dispersers and simultaneously to vertebrate frugivores that do not disperse seeds (the Directed Toxicity hypothesis). To tease apart these hypotheses, we tested whether consumption of artificial fruit agar by captive Cedar Waxwings (Bombycilla cedrorum) was reduced by the presence of c•-solamargine, a glycoalkaloid common in solanaceous fruits. We recorded consumption of three artificial fruit types differing in c•solamargine concentration and a control fruit that lacked c•-solamargine. Waxwings were strongly and equally deterred by all concentrations of c•-solamargine. These concentrations, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3% wet mass, are commonly found in some Solanum fruits. In a second trial, we addressed another hypothesis, the Nutrient-Toxin Titration hypothesis, which predicts that the deterrent effects of c•-solamargine can be overridden by highly nutritious fruit pulp. We offered waxwings three types of artificial fruits that varied in nutrient concentration but not in c•-solamargine concentration. Nutrient content had no effect on consumption when c•-solamargine was present. In summary, our results are inconsistent with both the Directed Toxicity and the Nutrient-Toxin Titration hypotheses. Received 24 June 1996, accepted 27 August 1997. BIRDS ARE PRIMARY CONSUMERS of fruits and dispersers of seeds. At one interface of this mutualistic interaction is the match between the nutritional requirements of birds and the chemical content of fruits (Martinez del Rio and Restrepo 1993). Nutrients of particular interest to researchers have been lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates (Martinez del Rio et al. 1989, Worthington 1989, Karasov and Levey 1990, Levey and Grajal 1991, Place and Stiles 1991, Witmer 1994, Afik and Karasov 1995). Largely overlooked are secondary metabolites, which promise to yield new insights for studies of fruit-frugivore interactions, as they have for studies of plant-herbivore interactions (Cipollini and Levey 1997b). For example, some secondary metabolites in ripe fruit pulp are paradoxical because they appear to deter fruit consumption-and hence seed dispersal--by seed-dispersing birds (Herrera 1982, Cipollini and Levey 1997c). How can their presence be explained in the context of mutualism? Here, we use Cedar Waxwings (Bombycilla cedrorum) to test two • E-mail: dlevey@zoo.ufl.edu 2 Present address: Department of Biology, 430 Berry College, Rome, Georgia, 30149, USA sets of hypotheses, formally proposed by Cipollini and Levey (1997c), that address the evolutionary significance of fruit secondary metabolites. The Directed Toxicity hypothesis tates that secondary metabolites in ripe fruit are to vertebrate frugivores that do not disperse seeds but are not to those that disperse seeds (Janzen 1975). This hypothesis gains credence from observations that seed-dispersing birds consume a wide range of toxic fruit (Martin et al. 1951, Kear 1968, Heiser 1969, Herrera 1982, Jordano 1987) and appear to be broadly tolerant of naturally occurring toxins (Herrera 1985). Alternatively, the General Toxicity hypothesis posits that secondary metabolites are repellent o all frugivores, regardless of how they treat seeds (Cipollini and Levey 1997c). This hypothesis is bolstered by studies concluding that variation in behavior and morphology among frugivores cannot account for variation in fruit traits (Herrera 1992, Jordano 1995, Tamboia et al. 1996). The Nutrient-Toxin Titration and Removal Rate hypotheses focus on interspecific variation among plants and the possible interactions of nutrient content, secondary chemistry, mi-
Read full abstract