One-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic simulations have been performed to study cold layer formation in a magnetized target fusion system with an inverse Z-pinch target plasma. Three phases of cold layer evolution has been identified. During the early compression phase, when liner velocities were not high, formation of a “classical” cold layer is observed, with monotonically increasing plasma densities and decreasing temperatures as the liner is approached. During the main compression phase, lasting until close to peak compression, magnetic flux leakage from the plasma to the liner is not important. The cold layer is then characterized by monotonically decreasing plasma temperature, density, and thermal conductivity. This has practical significance, since it would tend to reduce thermal losses to the liner. During the late compression and burn phases, magnetic flux leakage into the liner becomes important. This phase is characterized by a rapid increase in density and a rapid decrease in magnetic field and temperature toward the liner. This yields significantly higher values of thermal conductivity than in the bulk plasma, leading to enhanced thermal losses. During the first two phases, the entire plasma is magnetically confined. During the last phase, the cold layer changes to a wall-confined mode, while the bulk plasma continues to be magnetically confined. This is a major difference from earlier assumptions about wall confinement of such plasmas. These results show that the Kadomtsev stability parameter exceeds unity in the cold layer during the second and third phases, which may be an indication of instability. The choice of the transport model has a significant effect upon plasma evolution and the plasma lifetime. Classical transport yields plasma density levels near the liner that are significantly higher, sometimes by orders of magnitude, than those yielded by Bohm transport. During the main compression phase, Bohm diffusivity yields a lower lifetime, as expected. During the early compression phase, however, the classical lifetime is unexpectedly below the Bohm value. A physical explanation has been provided for these trends.
Read full abstract