The clinical usefulness of once weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists, dulaglutide (D) and semaglutide (S), on domestically approved doses in Japan, was assessed by the multicenter RCT to compare the efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of D at a dose of 0.75mg and S at a dose of 0.25-1.0mg in patients with type 2 diabetes. The study protocol was approved by the IRB of Kawasaki Medical School (No.5276-01). A total 120 patients eligible for the criteria with HbA1c of 7% or more were randomly assigned to groups D and S (D:S = 59:61), and 107 subjects completed the trial for 24 weeks (D:S=53:54). Backgrounds of 107 subjects were age 62.7 ± 10.7 years, disease duration 13.9 ± 7.4 years, BMI 29.3 ± 5.9 kg/m2, HbA1c 8.0 ± 0.6%. There were no differences in these parameters between 2 groups. Dose of S was escalated by 4 weeks from 0.25mg to adequate dose for each, and average dose was 0.63±0.24mg. The primary endpoint was the difference of HbA1c level between 2 groups at 24 weeks. The HbA1c level at 24 weeks was significantly lower in S than D (D: 8.1±0.6→7.4±0.8 vs S: 7.9±0.5→ 6.7±0.5%, p<0.0001). Reduction in BMI and VFA levels were also more significant in S (D vs. S), BMI: 29.2→28.8 vs. 29.4→28.1 kg/m2, VFA: 174.5→164.6 vs. 175.8→153.2cm2, respectively (p< 0.05). The achievement rate of HbA1c <7% was higher in S (D vs S; 30.8% vs 70.4%, p<0.0001). The parameters such as LDL-C, ALT, γGTP, and apo B/A1 were decreased, and the L/S ratio was increased only in S. Compared the changes in L/S ratio less than 0.9 at baseline, which is diagnosed as NAFLD by CT, between two groups, the ratio was significantly elevated only in the S, but not in D at 24weeks. Gastrointestinal symptoms were observed in 13.2% of D and 46.3% of S (p<0.01). DTR-QoL scores related to pain and gastrointestinal symptoms were superior in D. This prospective trial demonstrated that S has more pronounced effects on glucose and BMI lowering, as well as a reduction in liver fat percentage and visceral fat area. Disclosure T. Kimura: Speaker's Bureau; Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho, Kowa Research Institute, Inc., Taisho Pharmaceutical Holdings Co., Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Sanofi, MSD Life Science Foundation, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Novo Nordisk. Y. Katakura: Speaker's Bureau; Abbott. M. Shimoda: Speaker's Bureau; Sanofi, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kowa Company, Ltd., Novo Nordisk, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Taisho Pharmaceutical Holdings Co., Ltd., MSD Life Science Foundation, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. F. Kawasaki: None. M. Yamabe: Speaker's Bureau; Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc., Kowa Company, Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Terumo Corporation. F. Tatsumi: Speaker's Bureau; Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Kowa Company, Ltd., Novo Nordisk. M. Matsuki: None. Y. Iwamoto: Speaker's Bureau; Kowa Company, Ltd. T. Anno: None. Y. Fushimi: None. S. Kamei: None. Y. Kimura: None. J. Sanada: Speaker's Bureau; Lilly, Kowa Company, Ltd. Y. Hirata: None. S. Nakanishi: Speaker's Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Taisho Pharmaceutical Holdings Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo, Kowa Company, Ltd., Abbott, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. T. Mune: None. K. Kaku: Speaker's Bureau; Astellas Pharma Inc., Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc., Kowa Company, Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. Advisory Panel; Novo Nordisk. Consultant; Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho. Speaker's Bureau; Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. H. Kaneto: Research Support; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc. Speaker's Bureau; Lilly, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd. Research Support; Abbott.
Read full abstract