Salthe (1969), Salthe and Duellman (1973), and Salthe and Mecham (1974) generalized the published data on body size of the females, clutch size, ovum size, and reproductive mode of various amphibian species. For example, they recognized a positive interspecific correlation between ovum size and female body size in frogs within a given reproductive mode and a negative correlation between clutch size and ovum size regardless of differences in reproductive mode. Since these relationships of body size, clutch size, and ovum size should have been established during the evolutionary process as one of the adaptive features in each species, it is an interesting problem to examine whether the same sort of relationships are also found within each species. The data on which the above studies were based were from a large literature, and close examination of this literature reveals several defects for drawing relevant conclusions on the relationships of these parameters within as well as between species. There are only a few papers describing precise number and size of eggs from individual females, and, in most papers, the statistics are obtained from indirect methods. For instance, Tilley (1968) counted the number of follicles larger than 1 mm as the clutch size of five desmognathine salamanders, Bruce (1969) estimated the clutch size of four plethodontid salamanders from the yolked oocytes in the ovary, and Inger and Bacon (1968) determined the number of eggs of six Bornean frogs from the ratio of left ovary volume to 50 eggs removed from it. All these investigations were based on the preserved specimens. Only two papers deal with live animals. H6nig (1966) counted and measured the eggs obtained by spontaneous ovulation from the common frog, Rana temporaria, and Pettus and Angleton (1967) made the same kind of observations on eggs obtained by induced ovulation from the chorus frog, Pseudacris triseriata. The former study is obviously superior to the others in that it deals with weight, instead of length or volume, of females and eggs, although no correlation coefficient nor regression is given. Because the reproductive cost to the female of a given species should be expressed in terms of weight relationships, the weight parameters are more pertinent than the length or volume parameters. Since the intraspecific relationships between the reproductive parameters probably precede the interspecific relationships (Salthe and Duellman, 1973), comparative analyses on relationships both within and between species are critical for elucidating the adaptive evolution of reproductive strategies. From this point of view, the quantitative relationships among the weight parameters of eggs and adult females of 12 amphibian species from Japan were examined.