Body Radiation Therapy For Patients Research Articles

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, single-arm, multi-center study

Centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is difficult to be radically resected due to its special location close to major hepatic vessels. Thus, we aimed to assess whether stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can be an effective and safe approach for centrally located HCC. This retrospective study included 172 patients with centrally located HCC who were treated with SBRT. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed as the primary endpoint. Rates of progression-free survival (PFS), local control, intrahepatic relapse, extrahepatic metastasis and toxicities were analyzed as secondary endpoints. The OS rates of 1-, 3-, and 5-year were 97.7%, 86.7%, and 76.3%, respectively. The PFS/local control rates of 1-, 3-, and 5-year were 94.1%/98.2%, 76.8%/94.9%, and 59.3%/92.3%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of intrahepatic relapse/extrahepatic metastases of 1-, 3-, and 5-year were 3.7%/2.9%, 25.0%/7.4%, and 33.3%/9.8%, respectively. Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that patients received BED10 at 100 Gy or more had better OS. Radiation-related adverse events were mild to moderate according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, and no toxicities over grade 3 were observed. Patients with centrally located HCC in our cohort who received SBRT had similar OS and PFS rates compared to those reported in literatures who received surgery with neoadjuvant or adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy. These results indicate that SBRT is an effective and well-tolerated method for patients with centrally located HCC, suggesting that it may serve as a reasonable alternative treatment for these kind of patients.

Standard-of-care systemic therapy with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer (Consolidative Use of Radiotherapy to Block [CURB] oligoprogression): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study

Most patients with metastatic cancer eventually develop resistance to systemic therapy, with some having limited disease progression (ie, oligoprogression). We aimed to assess whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) targeting oligoprogressive sites could improve patient outcomes. We did a phase 2, open-label, randomised controlled trial of SBRT in patients with oligoprogressive metastatic breast cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after having received at least first-line systemic therapy, with oligoprogression defined as five or less progressive lesions on PET-CT or CT. Patients aged 18 years or older were enrolled from a tertiary cancer centre in New York, NY, USA, and six affiliated regional centres in the states of New York and New Jersey, with a 1:1 randomisation between standard of care (standard-of-care group) and SBRT plus standard of care (SBRT group). Randomisation was done with a computer-based algorithm with stratification by number of progressive sites of metastasis, receptor or driver genetic alteration status, primary site, and type of systemic therapy previously received. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, measured up to 12 months. We did a prespecified subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint by disease site. All analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03808662, and is complete. From Jan 1, 2019, to July 31, 2021, 106 patients were randomly assigned to standard of care (n=51; 23 patients with breast cancer and 28 patients with NSCLC) or SBRT plus standard of care (n=55; 24 patients with breast cancer and 31 patients with NSCLC). 16 (34%) of 47 patients with breast cancer had triple-negative disease, and 51 (86%) of 59 patients with NSCLC had no actionable driver mutation. The study was closed to accrual before reaching the targeted sample size, after the primary efficacy endpoint was met during a preplanned interim analysis. The median follow-up was 11·6 months for patients in the standard-of-care group and 12·1 months for patients in the SBRT group. The median progression-free survival was 3·2 months (95% CI 2·0-4·5) for patients in the standard-of-care group versus 7·2 months (4·5-10·0) for patients in the SBRT group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53, 95% CI 0·35-0·81; p=0·0035). The median progression-free survival was higher for patients with NSCLC in the SBRT group than for those with NSCLC in the standard-of-care group (10·0 months [7·2-not reached] vs 2·2 months [95% CI 2·0-4·5]; HR 0·41, 95% CI 0·22-0·75; p=0·0039), but no difference was found for patients with breast cancer (4·4 months [2·5-8·7] vs 4·2 months [1·8-5·5]; 0·78, 0·43-1·43; p=0·43). Grade 2 or worse adverse events occurred in 21 (41%) patients in the standard-of-care group and 34 (62%) patients in the SBRT group. Nine (16%) patients in the SBRT group had grade 2 or worse toxicities related to SBRT, including gastrointestinal reflux disease, pain exacerbation, radiation pneumonitis, brachial plexopathy, and low blood counts. The trial showed that progression-free survival was increased in the SBRT plus standard-of-care group compared with standard of care only. Oligoprogression in patients with metastatic NSCLC could be effectively treated with SBRT plus standard of care, leading to more than a four-times increase in progression-free survival compared with standard of care only. By contrast, no benefit was observed in patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer. Further studies to validate these findings and understand the differential benefits are warranted. National Cancer Institute.

Feasibility of fast, four-dimensional computed tomography-based O-ring LINAC plans for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with poor performance status

PurposeWe aimed to retrospectively analyzed the feasibility of fast four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT)-based O-ring LINAC treatment for patients with an average respiratory amplitude was< 0.5 cm and who cannot endure long treatment times due to poor performance status in lung 4D-stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).MethodsThis study included data of 38 patients who received lung 4D-SBRT and had average respiratory amplitude< 0.5 cm in the full phase. C-arm LINAC plans were based on 4DCT data obtained at phase values ranging from 20–70% using a C-arm LINAC. O-ring LINAC plans were retrospectively established based on 4DCT data obtained at phase values of 0–90% using an O-ring LINAC. The conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and gradient measurement of the planning target volumes (PTV) were analyzed to compare dosimetric data between C-arm LINAC and O-ring LINAC plans. Organs at risk were analyzed in accordance with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0915 protocol. Treatment delivery time and total monitor units were analyzed to compare the efficiency of treatment delivery. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P< 0.05).ResultsFor the PTV, there was no significant difference in the CI or HI between C-arm LINAC and O-ring LINAC plans. For organs-at-risk, all plans met the criteria for dose constraint. There was a significant difference between C-arm LINAC and O-ring LINAC plans except in the spinal cord. Treatment delivery time was 92% longer for C-arm LINAC plans than for O-ring LINAC plans. The total MU value for C-arm LINAC plans was 9.6% higher than that for O-ring LINAC plans.ConclusionWe verified the feasibility of fast 4DCT-based O-ring LINAC treatment for patients with average respiratory amplitude< 0.5 cm and who cannot endure long treatment times due to poor performance status in lung 4D-SBRT.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fiducial Placement for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

Accurate delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to pancreatic tumors relies on successful EUS-guided placement of fiducial markers. The aim of this study is to report the technical feasibility and safety of EUS-guided fiducial placement and to evaluate the characteristics and technical benefit of SBRT in a cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). A retrospective chart review was performed for all (n = 82) PC patients referred for EUS-guided fiducial placement by a single endosonographer at a tertiary cancer center. Data regarding EUS-related technical details, SBRT characteristics, adverse events, and continuous visibility of fiducials were recorded and analyzed. Most patients included in the study had either locally advanced disease (32 patients, 39%) or borderline resectable disease (29 patients, 35%). Eighty-two PC patients underwent the placement of 230 fiducial markers under EUS guidance. The technical success rate of the fiducial placement was 98%. No immediate EUS-related adverse events were reported. The average time to the simulation CT after fiducial placement was 3.1 days. Of the 216 fiducial markers used for the SBRT delivery, 202 fiducial markers were visible on both the simulation CT and the cone beam CT scan. A median dose of 40cGY was given to all the patients in five fractions. Of these, 41% of the patients reported no SBRT-related toxicities during the follow-up. Fatigue and nausea were the most reported SBRT-related toxicities, which were seen in 35% of the patients post-SBRT. Our results demonstrate that EUS-guided fiducial placement is safe and effective in target volume delineation, facilitating SBRT delivery in PC patients. Further clinical trials are needed to determine the SBRT-related survival benefits in patients with pancreatic cancer.

A phase I study of the combination of atezolizumab, tiragolumab, and stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with metastatic multiorgan cancer

BackgroundImmunotherapy targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is a standard of care in a number of metastatic malignancies, but less than a fifth of patients are expected to respond to ICIs (Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors). In a clinical trial, combining the anti-TIGIT (T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains) Mab (monoclonal antibody) tiragolumab with atezolizumab improved outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer. In preclinical models, SBRT (Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy) could increase expression levels of the inhibitory co-receptors TIGIT and PD-L1. We aim to assess the combination of tiragolumab with atezolizumab and SBRT in metastatic, previously treated by ICIs, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, bladder cancer, and renal cell cancer.MethodsThis phase I study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05259319) will assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of atezolizumab with tiragolumab and stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with histologically proven metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell cancer, bladder cancer, and head and neck cancer previously treated. First part: 2 different schedules of SBRT in association with a fixed dose of atezolizumab and tiragolumab will be investigated only with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients (cohort 1). The expansion cohorts phase will be a multicentric, open-label study at the recommended scheme of administration and enroll additional patients with metastatic bladder cancer, renal cell cancer, and head and neck cancer (cohort 2, 3 and 4). Patients will be treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, intercurrent conditions that preclude continuation of treatment, or patient refusal in the absence of progression or intolerance. The primary endpoint of the first phase is the safety of the combination in a sequential or concomitant scheme and to determine the expansion cohorts phase recommended scheme of administration. The primary endpoint of phase II is to evaluate the efficacy of tiragolumab + atezolizumab + SBRT in terms of 6-month PFS (Progression-Free Survival). Ancillary analyses will be performed with peripheral and intratumoral immune biomarker assessments.Trial registrationThis study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05259319, since February 28th, 2022.

EP07.01-23 Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Patients with Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Inoperable

EP07.01-23 Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Patients with Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Inoperable

957P Interim report of Notable-HCC: A phase Ib study of neoadjuvant PD-1 with stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

957P Interim report of Notable-HCC: A phase Ib study of neoadjuvant PD-1 with stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

The Feasibility of Fast, Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Based O-Ring Linac Plans for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Poor Performance Status

As patients with poor performance status cannot endure long treatment times, it can lead to unplanned and prolonged radiation treatment or discontinuation of treatment. Moreover, prolonged radiation treatment appears to negatively affect survival for patients. We aimed to verify the feasibility of fast 4DCT-based O-ring linear accelerator (LINAC) treatment in lung 4D stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). This study included data of 38 patients who received lung 4D-SBRT. Gating20-70% plans were based on 4DCT data obtained at phase values ranging from 20-70% using a C-arm LINAC. Non-GatingFB plans were retrospectively established based on 4DCT data obtained at phase values of 0-90% using an O-ring LINAC. The prescribed dose of 4,800 cGy was delivered to PTV in four fractions. The conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and gradient measurement (GM) of the PTV were analyzed to compare dosimetric data between Gating20-70% and Non-GatingFB plans. Organs at risks (OARs) were analyzed in accordance with the RTOG 0915 protocol. Treatment delivery time and total monitor units (MU) were analyzed to compare the efficiency of treatment delivery. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p<0.05). For the PTV, there was no significant difference in the CI or HI between Gating20-70% and Non-GatingFB plans (CI: 1.337±0.137, 1.335±0.174, HI: 0.939±0.015, 0.939±0.016, all at p>0.05). However, there was a significant difference in GM between Gating20-70% and Non-GatingFB plan (1.528±0.206 cm, 1.381±0.222 cm, p<0.001). For OARs, all plans met the criteria for dose constraint. There was a significant difference between Gating20-70% and Non-GatingFB plans except in the spinal cord. In particular, D1000cc and D1500cc values for the ipsilateral lung for Gating20-70% plans were 31.6% and 59.9% lower than those for Non-GatingFB plans (D1000cc: 50.780±132.061 cGy, 34.755±102.480 cGy, p<0.001, D1500cc: 6.641±14.598 cGy, 2.666±7.926 cGy, p<0.001). Treatment delivery time was 92% longer for Gating20-70% plans than for Non-GatingFB plans (5.0±0.4 min, 9.6±3.3 min, p = 0.043). The total MU value for Gating20-70% plans was 9.6% higher than that for Non-GatingFB plans (3665.8±230.7, 4016±236.9, p = 0.039). When compared to OARs both plans were acceptable per RTOG-0915 protocol, but significant differences were between Non-GatingFB and Gating20-70% plans. However, treatment delivery time of Non-GatingFB plans decreased by 47.9% than Gating20-70% plans. We verified the feasibility of fast 4DCT-based O-ring LINAC treatment for patients who cannot endure long treatment times due to poor performance status in lung 4D-SBRT. In further study, we will analyze dosimetric differences and treatment delivery efficiency considering tumor motion according to tumor location.

Lesion Dosimetry for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Combined with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Oligometastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

A single-institution prospective pilot clinical trial was performed to demonstrate the feasibility of combining [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Methods: Six patients with 9 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive oligometastases received 2 cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RPT followed by SBRT. After the first intravenous infusion of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (7.46 ± 0.15 GBq), patients underwent SPECT/CT at 3.2 ± 0.5, 23.9 ± 0.4, and 87.4 ± 12.0 h. Voxel-based dosimetry was performed with calibration factors (11.7 counts per second/MBq) and recovery coefficients derived from in-house phantom experiments. Lesions were segmented on baseline PSMA PET/CT (50% SUVmax). After a second cycle of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (44 ± 3 d; 7.50 ± 0.10 GBq) and an interim PSMA PET/CT scan, SBRT (27 Gy in 3 fractions) was delivered to all PSMA-avid oligometastatic sites, followed by post-PSMA PET/CT. RPT and SBRT voxelwise dose maps were scaled (α/β = 3 Gy; repair half-time, 1.5 h) to calculate the biologically effective dose (BED). Results: All patients completed the combination therapy without complications. No grade 3+ toxicities were noted. The median of the lesion SUVmax as measured on PSMA PET was 16.8 (interquartile range [IQR], 11.6) (baseline), 6.2 (IQR, 2.7) (interim), and 2.9 (IQR, 1.4) (post). PET-derived lesion volumes were 0.4-1.7 cm3 The median lesion-absorbed dose (AD) from the first cycle of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RPT (ADRPT) was 27.7 Gy (range, 8.3-58.2 Gy; corresponding to 3.7 Gy/GBq, range, 1.1-7.7 Gy/GBq), whereas the median lesion AD from SBRT was 28.1 Gy (range, 26.7-28.8 Gy). Spearman rank correlation, ρ, was 0.90 between the baseline lesion PET SUVmax and SPECT SUVmax (P = 0.005), 0.74 (P = 0.046) between the baseline PET SUVmax and the lesion ADRPT, and -0.81 (P = 0.022) between the lesion ADRPT and the percent change in PET SUVmax (baseline to interim). The median for the lesion BED from RPT and SBRT was 159 Gy (range, 124-219 Gy). ρ between the BED from RPT and SBRT and the percent change in PET SUVmax (baseline to post) was -0.88 (P = 0.007). Two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RPT contributed approximately 40% to the maximum BED from RPT and SBRT. Conclusion: Lesional dosimetry in patients with oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer undergoing [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RPT followed by SBRT is feasible. Combined RPT and SBRT may provide an efficient method to maximize the delivery of meaningful doses to oligometastatic disease while addressing potential microscopic disease reservoirs and limiting the dose exposure to normal tissues.

Checkpoint Inhibitors in Combination With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 have improved the outcome for many cancer types, the majority of patients fails to respond to ICI monotherapy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy has the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio of ICIs. To assess the addition of radiotherapy to ICIs compared with ICI monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. This open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial was conducted in 5 Belgian hospitals and enrolled participants between March 2018 and October 2020. Patients 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, or non-small cell lung carcinoma were eligible. A total of 99 patients were randomly assigned to either the control arm (n = 52) or the experimental arm (n = 47). Of those, 3 patients (1 in the control arm vs 2 in the experimental arm) withdrew consent and thus were not included in the analysis. Data analyses were performed between April 2022 and March 2023. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive anti-PD-1/PD-1 ligand 1 ICIs alone as per standard of care (control arm) or combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy 3 × 8 gray to a maximum of 3 lesions prior to the second or third ICI cycle, depending on the frequency of administration (experimental arm). Randomization was stratified according to tumor histologic findings and disease burden (3 and fewer or more than 3 cancer lesions). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) as per immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Key secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, local control rate, and toxic effects. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, while safety was evaluated in the as-treated population. Among 96 patients included in the analysis (mean age, 66 years; 76 [79%] female), 72 (75%) had more than 3 tumor lesions and 65 (68%) had received at least 1 previous line of systemic treatment at time of inclusion. Seven patients allocated to the experimental arm did not complete the study-prescribed radiotherapy course due to early disease progression (n = 5) or intercurrent illness (n = 2). With a median (range) follow-up of 12.5 (0.7-46.2) months, median PFS was 2.8 months in the control arm compared with 4.4 months in the experimental arm (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.58-1.53; P = .82). Between the control and experimental arms, no improvement in median OS was observed (11.0 vs 14.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.48-1.41; P = .47), and objective response rate was not statistically significantly different (22% vs 27%; P = .56), despite a local control rate of 75% in irradiated patients. Acute treatment-related toxic effects of any grade and grade 3 or higher occurred in 79% and 18% of patients in the control arm vs 78% and 18% in the experimental arm, respectively. No grade 5 adverse events occurred. This phase 2 randomized clinical trial demonstrated that while safe, adding subablative stereotactic radiotherapy of a limited number of metastatic lesions to ICI monotherapy failed to show improvement in PFS or OS. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03511391.

Local disease control after stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms: a cohort study

Background Neuroendocrine neoplasms represent a diverse group of malignancies. Anatomic origin, histology and aggressiveness vary extensively, from low-grade tumours with an indolent prognosis to highly aggressive conditions with poor outcome. Surgery, with a curative intent, is the standard of treatment when possible. Other treatment regimens include local treatment, or systemic therapy. The role of radiotherapy in treating neuroendocrine neoplasms is not yet established, but studies indicate that a high rate of local control can be achieved by high-dose radiotherapy. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is high dose of radiation delivered to a small volume. We aimed to investigate the one-year local control rate of SBRT in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. Material and Methods Patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms treated with SBRT between 2003 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. Patient characteristics and SBRT-details were collected by review of patient records and the radiotherapy planning charts. All types except for small cell lung cancer and brain metastases were allowed. The prescribed dose was 45–67.8 Gy in three fractions. Progression, both within the target-site and in other sites, was determined based on existing imaging reports. One-year local control rate and systemic control rate was calculated. Descriptive analyses of local response duration, progression-free survival and overall survival were performed. Results Twenty-one patients were included. The one-year local control rate was 94%. Four of the patients had local progression. All patients receiving SBRT towards their primary tumour (n = 11) had a bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasm, and a one-year local control rate of 100%. In patients treated at a metastatic target, 80% developed systemic progression but the local control remained high. Conclusion Our study suggests that SBRT may offer a feasible and effective treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms in selected cases. SBRT provides long-term local stability and may be useful in treating patients with localised disease not fit for surgery.

THU-151 - Efficacy and tolerability of stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

THU-151 - Efficacy and tolerability of stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

First in class TLR7/8 agonist BDB001 combined with atezolizumab and stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Results from the AGADIR study.

4153 Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is refractory to immune checkpoint inhibitors such as PD1/PDL1 antagonists. Investigating alternative immunotherapeutic approaches is a crucial need for this devastating disease. The potent immunostimulatory effects of Toll-like receptor (TLRs) have spurred efforts aimed at the development of TLR agonists as new immune-oncology agents. Radiation therapy combined with TLRs agonists has been shown to enhance antitumor immunity in the preclinical setting. Methods: AGADIR is a multi-cohort, phase 2, multicenter, open-label study investigating the novel TLR 7/8 agonist BDB001 combined with atezolizumab and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with advanced cancers. Cohort A enrolled patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. BDB001 was administered IV at the dose of 0.75 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1, 2, and 3. Then from cycle 4 on day 1 every 3 weeks. Atezolizumab was given at the dose of 1200 mg every 3 weeks. SBRT of at least one metastatic lesion was started at least one week after the first administration of atezolizumab and at the latest before the Cycle 2 Day 1. The primary endpoint is disease control rate defined as the proportion of participants with complete response, partial response or stable disease, as per adapted RECIST v1.1, observed within 24 weeks of treatment onset. Secondary endpoints include objective response, progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. All patients underwent sequential blood and tissue sampling for translational studies. Results: Between July 2021, and June 2022, 32 pts were enrolled in 3 centers (14 male, 18 female). Median age was 64 years (range 38 – 78). Median number of previous treatment lines was 1 (range 1 – 5). The most common treatment related adverse events were grade 1/2 asthenia, chills and fever. No death was related to the treatment. Among the 21 patients for whom central review was performed at the time of this writing, best tumor response was confirmed partial response, stable disease and progressive disease in 2 (9.5%), 6 (28.5%) and 13 (62.0%) patients respectively. The disease control rate was 38.0% (95%CI 18.1-61.5). Conclusions: The AGADIR study met its first endpoint for disease control rate in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Efficacy data on the whole cohort of patients and full biomarkers analyses will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03915678 .

Association of circulating CD103+ T cells with major pathological response in a randomized phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant durvalumab with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

8550 Background: We previously reported results of a randomized phase 2 study, demonstrating a higher rate of major pathological response to durvalumab in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) compared to durvalumab alone in patients with localized (stage I-IIIA) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Biomarkers of response in NSCLC are poorly understood. To address this, we evaluated sequentially collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from study participants to identify easily accessible biomarkers associated with major pathological responses. Methods: PBMCs were obtained from study participants at defined pre-treatment, peri-operative, and post-operative timepoints. We performed 25-marker spectral flow cytometric analysis of the T cell compartment in these samples and used dimensionality reduction and clustering programs to identify populations of interest. Results: Our analysis of these samples revealed populations of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with hallmarks of prior antigen exposure and tissue residency (CD103+, CCR7-, CD45RA-), suggesting tumor-experienced T cells circulating into the blood. Greater pre-treatment frequency of these T cell populations was associated with major pathological responses to neoadjuvant therapy. This observation was consistent when evaluating patients with major pathological responses across both treatment arms, and within the durvalumab plus SBRT group, where we had enough patients with major pathological responses. Maturation of disease-free survival data from this trial will enable us to evaluate the association of these biomarkers with long-term survival. Conclusions: Together, these data reveal an unexpected population of T cells in the peripheral blood with features of tissue-residency, which are associated with major pathological responses, and suggest that re-circulation of tumor-experienced T cells may represent a predictive biomarker for neoadjuvant treatment of NSCLC.

CT-based radiomics prediction of complete response after stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with lung metastases.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is akey treatment modality for lung cancer patients. This study aims to develop amachine learning-based prediction model of complete response for lung oligometastatic cancer patients undergoing SBRT. CT images of 80pulmonary oligometastases from 56patients treated with SBRT were analyzed. The gross tumor volumes (GTV) were contoured on CT images. Patients that achieved complete response (CR) at 4months were defined as responders. For each GTV, 107radiomic features were extracted using the Pyradiomics software. The concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) between the region of interest (ROI)-based radiomics features obtained by the two segmentations were calculated. Pairwise feature interdependencies were evaluated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. The association of clinical variables and radiomics features with CR was evaluated with univariate logistic regression. Two supervised machine learning models, the logistic regression (LR) and the classification and regression tree analysis (CART), were trained to predict CR. The models were cross-validated using afive-fold cross-validation. The performance of models was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and class-specific accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-measure evaluation metrics. Complete response was associated with four radiomics features, namely the surface to volume ratio (SVR; p = 0.003), the skewness (Skew; p = 0.027), the correlation (Corr; p = 0.024), and the grey normalized level uniformity (GNLU; p = 0.015). No significant relationship between clinical parameters and CR was found. In the validation set, the developed LR and CART machine learning models had an accuracy, precision, and recall of 0.644 and 0.750, 0.644 and 0.651, and 0.635 and 0.754, respectively. The area under the curve for CR prediction was 0.707 and 0.753 for the LR and CART models, respectively. This analysis demonstrates that radiomics features obtained from pretreatment CT could predict complete response of lung oligometastases following SBRT.

Safety and clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition and stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with spine metastasis.

Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has revolutionized the treatment of patients with many tumor histologies. Simultaneously, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) provides excellent local control (LC) and plays an important role in the management of spine metastasis. Promising preclinical work suggests the potential therapeutic benefit of combining SBRT with ICI therapy, but the safety profile of combined therapy is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the toxicity profile associated with ICI in patients receiving SBRT and, secondarily, whether ICI administration sequence with respect to SBRT affects LC or overall survival (OS) outcomes. The authors retrospectively reviewed patients with spine metastasis treated with SBRT at an academic center. Patients who received ICI at any point during their disease course were compared to those with the same primary tumor types who did not receive ICI by using Cox proportional hazards analyses. Primary outcomes were long-term sequelae, including radiation-induced spinal cord myelopathy, esophageal stricture, and bowel obstruction. Secondarily, models were created to evaluate OS and LC in the cohort. Two hundred forty patients who received SBRT to 299 spine metastases were included in this study. The most common primary tumor types were non-small cell lung cancer (n = 59 [24.6%]) and renal cell carcinoma (n = 55 [22.9%]). One hundred eight patients received at least 1 dose of ICI, with the most common regimen being single-agent anti-PD-1 (n = 80 [74.1%]), followed by combination CTLA-4/PD-1 inhibitors (n = 19 [17.6%]). Three patients experienced long-term radiation-induced sequelae: 2 had esophageal stricture and 1 had bowel obstruction. No patients developed radiation-induced myelopathy. There was no association between receipt of ICI and development of any of these adverse events (p > 0.9). Similarly, ICI was not significantly associated with either LC (p = 0.3) or OS (p = 0.6). In the entire cohort, patients who received ICI prior to beginning SBRT had worse median survival, but ICI sequence with respect to SBRT was not significantly prognostic of either LC (p > 0.3) or OS (p > 0.07); instead, baseline performance status was most predictive of OS (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07-1.78, p = 0.012). Treatment regimens that combine ICIs before, concurrent with, and after SBRT for spine metastases are safe, with minimal risk for increased rates of long-term toxicity.

Clinical Outcome of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Early-Stage Lung Cancer with Ground-Glass Opacity Predominant Lesions: A Single Institution Experience.

The detection rate of early-stage lung cancer with ground-glass opacity (GGO) has increased, and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been suggested as an alternative to surgery in inoperable patients. However, reports on treatment results are limited. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study to investigate the clinical outcome after SBRT in patients with early-stage lung cancer with GGO-predominant tumor lesions at a single institution. This study included 89 patients with 99 lesions who were treated with SBRT for lung cancer with GGO-predominant lesions that had a consolidation-to-tumor ratio of ≤0.5 at Asan Medical Center between July 2016 and July 2021. A median total dose of 56.0 Gy (range, 48.0-60.0) was delivered using 10.0-15.0 Gy per fraction. The overall follow-up period for the study was median 33.0 months (range, 9.9 to 65.9 months). There was 100% local control with no recurrences in any of the 99 treated lesions. Three patients had regional recurrences outside of the radiation field, and three had distant metastasis. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates were 100.0%, 91.6%, and 82.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that advanced age and a low level of diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide were significantly associated with overall survival. There were no patients with grade ≥3 toxicity. SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for patients with GGO-predominant lung cancer lesions and is likely to be considered as an alternative to surgery.

Selection of fractionation regimens of stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with early stage lung cancer

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer was, is, and will remain the key subject of discussions between radiation oncologists and surgeons. Despite the positive treatment outcomes reported in some large studies on efficacy of the stereotactic radiotherapy, its use instead of surgery may not always be an unconditional decision. However, stereotactic radiotherapy opens new treatment options in patients who are inoperable or refused surgery. This is possibly due to the high accuracy of modern linear accelerators, which allow to reduce the toxicity of radiotherapy and achieve an almost identical overall survival rate compared to surgery.

Predictive model based on DCE-MRI and clinical features for the evaluation of pain response after stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with spinal metastases.

To investigate the correlation of conventional MRI, DCE-MRI and clinical features with pain response after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with spinal metastases and establish a pain response prediction model. Patients with spinal metastases who received SBRT in our hospital from July 2018 to April 2022 consecutively were enrolled. All patients underwent conventional MRI and DCE-MRI before treatment. Pain was assessed before treatment and in the third month after treatment, and the patients were divided into pain-response and no-pain-response groups. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to obtain the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each variable. C-index was used to evaluate the model's discrimination performance. Overall, 112 independent spinal lesions in 89 patients were included. There were 73 (65.2%) and 39 (34.8%) lesions in the pain-response and no-pain-response groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of treated lesions, pretreatment pain score, Karnofsky performance status score, Bilsky grade, and the DCE-MRI quantitative parameter Ktrans were independent predictors of post-SBRT pain response in patients with spinal metastases. The discrimination performance of the prediction model was good; the C index was 0.806 (95% CI: 0.721-0.891), and the corrected C-index was 0.754. Some imaging and clinical features correlated with post-SBRT pain response in patients with spinal metastases. The model based on these characteristics has a good predictive value and can provide valuable information for clinical decision-making. • SBRT can accurately irradiate spinal metastases with ablative doses. • Predicting the post-SBRT pain response has important clinical implications. • The prediction models established based on clinical and MRI features have good performance.

Early outcomes from a phase II randomized trial testing stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients undergoing I line treatment with abiraterone acetate for oligometastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (ARTO trial-NCT03449719)

Early outcomes from a phase II randomized trial testing stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients undergoing I line treatment with abiraterone acetate for oligometastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (ARTO trial-NCT03449719)