Esophageal Body Research Articles

Natural airway as an alternative to intubation for pediatric endoscopic esophageal foreign body removal: A retrospective cohort study of 326 patients.

Anesthesia is required for endoscopic removal of esophageal foreign bodies (EFBs) in children. Historically, endotracheal intubation has been the de facto gold standard for airway management in these cases. However, as more elective endoscopic procedures are now performed under propofol sedation with natural airway, there has been a move toward using similar Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) for select patients who require endoscopic removal of an EFB. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we compared endoscopic EFB removal with either MAC or endotracheal intubation. Descriptive statistics summarized factors stratified by initial choice of airway technique, including intra- and postanesthesia complications and the frequency of mid-procedure conversion to endotracheal intubation in those initially managed with MAC. To demonstrate the magnitude of associations between these factors and the anesthesiologist's choice of airway technique, univariable Firth logistic and quantile regressions were used to estimate odds ratios (95% CI) and beta coefficients (95% CI). From the initial search, 326 patients were identified. Among them, 23% (n = 75) were planned for intubation and 77% (n = 251) were planned for MAC. Three patients (0.9%) who were initially planned for MAC required conversion to endotracheal intubation after induction. Two (0.6%) of these children were admitted to the hospital after the procedure and treated for ongoing airway reactivity. No patient experienced reflux of gastric contents to the mouth or dislodgement of the foreign body to the airway, and no patient required administration of vasoactive medications or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Patients had higher odds that the anesthesiologist chose to utilize MAC if the foreign body was a coin (OR, 3.3; CI, 1.9-5.7, p < .001) or if their fasting time was >6 h. Median total operating time was 15 min greater in intubated patients (11 vs. 26 min, p < .001). This study demonstrates that MAC may be considered for select pediatric patients undergoing endoscopic removal of EFB, especially those who have ingested coins, who do not have reactive airways, who have fasted for >6 h, and in whom the endoscopic procedure is expected to be short and uncomplicated. Prospective multi-site studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Saliva Production and Esophageal Motility Influence Esophageal Acid Clearance Related toPost-reflux Swallow-Induced Peristaltic Wave.

The post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) brings salivary bicarbonate to neutralize residual distal esophageal mucosal acidification. To determine if reduced saliva production and esophageal body hypomotility would compromise PSPW-induced pH recovery in the distal esophagus. In this multicenter retrospective cross-sectional study, patients with confirmed Sjogren's syndrome and scleroderma/mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) who underwent high resolution manometry (HRM) and ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring off antisecretory therapy were retrospectively identified. Patients without these disorders undergoing HRM and pH-impedance monitoring for GERD symptoms were identified from the same time-period. Acid exposure time, numbers of reflux episodes and PSPW, pH recovery with PSPW, and HRM metrics were extracted. Univariate comparisons and multivariable analysis were performed to determine predictors of pH recovery with PSPW. Among Sjogren's syndrome (n = 34), scleroderma/MCTD (n = 14), and comparison patients with reflux symptoms (n = 96), the scleroderma/MCTD group had significantly higher AET, higher prevalence of hypomotility, lower detected reflux episodes, and very low numbers of PSPW (p ≤ 0.004 compared to other groups). There was no difference in pH-impedance metrics between Sjogren's syndrome, and comparison patients (p ≥ 0.481). Proportions with complete pH recovery with PSPW was lower in Sjogren's patients compared to comparison reflux patients (p = 0.009), predominantly in subsets with hypomotility (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, diagnosis of Sjogren's syndrome, scleroderma/MCTD or neither (p = 0.014) and esophageal hypomotility (p = 0.024) independently predicted lack of complete pH recovery with PSPW, while higher total reflux episodes trended (p = 0.051). Saliva production and motor function are both important in PSPW related pH recovery.

Effect of esophageal body recoil on clinical outcomes in non-spastic achalasia.

Despite the established efficacy of achalasia treatments on symptomatic outcomes, there are limited data evaluating the treatment effect on esophageal dilatation. This study aimed to assess the effect achalasia treatment on esophageal dilatation and the effect of esophageal width reduction ("recoil") on clinical outcomes. Patients with type I or type II achalasia that completed high-resolution manometry (HRM), functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP), and timed barium esophagram (TBE) pre and post treatment were included. Esophageal width was measured using TBE. Focused subgroup analysis was performed on patients with normal posttreatment EGJ opening on FLIP. Good clinical outcomes were defined as barium column height of <5 cm at 5 min and Eckardt Score ≤3. Sixty-nine patients (41% type I and 59% type II) were included. Esophageal width decreased from pre to post treatment mean (SD) 4.2 (1.3) cm-2.8 (1.2) cm; p < 0.01. In the normal post treatment EGJ opening subgroup, esophageal width was less in patients with good TBE outcome compared to poor outcome mean (SD) 2.2 (0.7) cm versus 3.2 (1.4) cm (p < 0.01), but did not differ in good versus poor symptomatic outcome groups. Esophageal width recoil >25% posttreatment was associated with a greater rate of good TBE outcome (71% vs. 50%, p = 0.04) and good symptomatic outcome (88% vs. 50%; p = 0.04). Esophageal recoil was associated with good achalasia treatment outcome in patients without posttreatment EGJ obstruction. This suggests that mechanical properties of the esophageal wall, likely associated with tissue remodeling, play a role in clinical outcomes following achalasia treatment.

Does the presence of an esophageal motor disorder influence the response to anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for refractory GERD?

Introduction The prevalence of esophageal motor disorders (EMD) in PPI-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is substantial. However, limited data exist on their impact on the efficacy of endoscopic treatments like anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS). This study aimed to evaluate the influence of EMD on ARMS efficacy in patients with PPI-refractory GERD. Method This single-center retrospective study enrolled patients with refractory GERD treated with ARMS-b (anti-reflux mucosectomy band-ligation). High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) was conducted before the procedure to identify EMD presence. The primary endpoint was treatment efficacy, defined as >50% improvement in GERD-HRQL score at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included PPI intake, symptom control, ARMS complications, and overall patient satisfaction at 12 months. Results The study included 65 patients, with 41 (63.1%) showing EMD on HREM. Treatment efficacy was achieved by 33.8% (22) of patients, with 8 without EMD, 11 having isolated LES hypotonia, and 3 with both LES hypotonia and esophageal body motor disorder. No significant differences were observed between patients with and without EMD regarding the primary endpoint, PPI use, symptom control, or complications. Dysphagia developed in 52.3% (34) within 6 months, leading to esophageal dilatation in 15.3% (10). Two patients experienced acute hemorrhage, and one had perforation. Conclusion The presence of esophageal motor disorders does not seem to impact ARMS response, suggesting the technique’s consideration in this population. Larger studies are essential for confirming these results and exploring treatment response and post-operative predictors.

Vascular covered stent and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for Aortoesophageal fistula caused by esophageal fishbone: a case report

BackgroundAortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare condition characterized by communication between the aorta and esophagus. AEF caused by an esophageal foreign body is even rare, and there is currently no recommended standard treatment protocol. We report a case of delayed aortic rupture after the endoscopic removal of a fish bone, which was successfully treated with a combined approach of vascular stenting and thoracic surgery.Case presentationA 33-year-old man presented to the hospital after experiencing chest discomfort for 3 days following the accidental ingestion of a fish bone. Under endoscopic guidance, the fish bone was successfully removed, and the patient was subsequently admitted for medical therapy. On the fourth postoperative day, the patient suddenly developed hematemesis, and chest computed tomography angiography revealed the presence of an AEF. This necessitated urgent intervention; hence, thoracic surgery was performed and a vascular-covered stent was placed. Following the surgical procedure, the patient received active medical treatment, recovered well, and was successfully discharged from the hospital.ConclusionsIn patients with esophageal perforation caused by foreign bodies, hospitalization for observation, computed tomography angiography examination, early use of antibiotics, and careful assessment of aortic damage are advised. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair and esophageal rupture repair may have benefits for the treatment of AEF.

Foreign body within the upper esophagus of a patient not consenting to surgical treatment – case report and legal proceedings in light of current case law

&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Patients intentionally inserting foreign bodies into the lumen of their gastrointestinal tract usually aim at achieving certain benefits, such as postponement or avoidance of punishment.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; In view of the ever-increasing number of proceedings (including criminal proceedings) against health care professionals, the authors carried out a review of the available literature on: medical actions undertaken in cases of foreign bodies within the esophagus, current legislation and jurisprudence as practiced in the Republic of Poland within the context of model legal proceedings in cases involving patients raising doubts about being fully conscious and not consenting to necessary treatment.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Case report:&lt;/b&gt; The article presents a case of a patient with an esophageal foreign body who had not consented to the proposed surgical treatment. Doubts as raised within the otorhinolaryngological team with regard to the patient’s state of consciousness were not dispelled as the result of psychiatric consultation. Following a meticulous analysis of the current jurisprudence of the Polish judicial system and obtaining a court’s permission to intervene, the procedure (esophagoscopy with removal of esophageal foreign body) was performed. After exclusion of any life-threatening complications, the patient was transferred to the Psychiatric Department.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; In the current state of the law, performing a procedure to remove a foreign body from the esophagus without prior court approval could qualify as a violation of patient’s rights. In such case, legal liability of the physician would arise regardless of the fact that the patient would have received care in accordance with the current medical knowledge and practice.&lt;/br&gt;

Failure of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Achalasia Cardia—LES-Directed Therapy or Esophageal Body Therapy-Directed Therapy?: A Pictorial High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry (HREM) Case-Based Analysis

AbstractPer-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is one of the main modalities of treatment of achalasia cardia today across subtypes and we are increasingly seeing patients persistent or recurrent symptoms after POEM. An accurate high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) is one of the most important tests that can help us guide the treatment in cases of failure of POEM. HREM can help us direct the therapy. The therapy can be lower esophageal sphincter-directed therapy or esophageal body-directed therapy that can be ascertained using HREM. With this review, we detail the factors associated with failure of POEM, tests that can be utilized for its evaluation, and case-based analysis using HREM in patients of post-POEM failure.

Migrated oesophageal foreign body retrieval with trans cervical approach in a district general hospital of Sri Lanka

A 53-year-old previously healthy patient presentated with an impending airway obstruction due to a retropharyngeal and a para-oesophageal abscess caused by a delayed impacted foreign body,failed retrieval with rigid oesophagosopy. The patient was successfully managed by exploration of the neck with trance cervical approach in a district general hospital setting. Awareness and early referral from primary care setting could have prevented a potentially life threatening complication.

Secondary peristalsis and esophagogastric junction distensibility in symptomatic post-fundoplication patients.

The impact of esophageal dysmotility among patients with post-fundoplication esophageal symptoms is not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate secondary peristalsis and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) opening biomechanics using functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panometry in symptomatic post-fundoplication patients. Eighty-seven adult patients post-fundoplication who completed FLIP for symptomatic esophageal evaluation were included. Secondary peristaltic contractile response (CR) patterns and EGJ opening metrics (EGJ distensibility index (EGJ-DI) and maximum EGJ diameter) were evaluated on FLIP panometry and analyzed against high-resolution manometry (HRM), patient-reported outcomes, and fundoplication condition seen on esophagram and/or endoscopy. FLIP CR patterns included 14 (16%) normal CR, 30 (34%) borderline CR, 28 (32%) impaired/disordered CR, 13 (15%) absent CR, and 2 (2%) spastic reactive CR. Compared with normal and borderline CRs (i.e., CR patterns with distinct, antegrade peristalsis), patients with impaired/disordered and absent CRs demonstrated significantly greater time since fundoplication (2.4 (0.6-6.8) vs. 8.9 (2.6-14.5) years; p = 0.002), greater esophageal body width on esophagram (n = 50; 2.3 (2.0-2.8) vs. 2.9 (2.4-3.6) cm; p = 0.013), and lower EGJ-DI (4.3 (2.7-5.4) vs. 2.6 (1.7-3.7) mm2/mmHg; p = 0.001). Intact fundoplications had significantly higher rates of normal CRs compared to anatomically abnormal (i.e., tight, disrupted, slipped, herniated) fundoplications (9 (28%) vs. 5 (9%); p = 0.032), but there were no differences in EGJ-DI or EGJ maximum diameter. Symptomatic post-fundoplication patients were characterized by frequent abnormal secondary peristalsis after fundoplication, potentially worsening with time after fundoplication or related to EGJ outflow resistance.

Esophageal body adaptation to Nissen fundoplication: Increased esophagogastric outflow resistance yields delayed and sustained peristaltic contractions without increased amplitude.

Improvement in lower esophageal sphincter (LES) competency after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is well established, yet esophageal body physiology data are limited. We aimed to describe the impact of LNF on whole esophagus physiology using standard and novel manometric characteristics. A cohort of patients with an intact fundoplication without herniation and no postoperative dysphagia were selected and underwent esophageal manometry at one-year after surgery. Pre- and post-operative manometry files were reanalyzed using standard and novel manometric characteristics and compared. A total of 95 patients were included in this study. At 16.1 (8.7) months LNF increased LES overall and abdominal length and resting pressure (p < 0.0001). Outflow resistance (IRP) increased [5.8 (3-11) to 11.1 (9-15), p < 0.0001] with a 95th percentile of 20 mmHg in this cohort of dysphagia-free patients. Distal contractile integral (DCI) also increased [1177.0 (667-2139) to 1321.1 (783-2895), p = 0.002], yet contractile amplitude was unchanged (p = 0.158). There were direct correlations between pre- and post-operative DCI [R: 0.727 (0.62-0.81), p < 0.0001] and postoperative DCI and postoperative IRP [R: 0.347 (0.16-0.51), p = 0.0006]. Contractile front velocity [3.5 (3-4) to 3.2 (3-4), p = 0.0013] was slower, while distal latency [6.7 (6-8) to 7.4 (7-9), p < 0.0001], the interval from swallow onset to proximal smooth muscle initiation [4.0 (4-5) to 4.4 (4-5), p = 0.0002], and the interval from swallow onset to point when the peristaltic wave meets the LES [9.4 (8-10) to 10.3 (9-12), p < 0.0001] were longer. Esophageal length [21.9 (19-24) to 23.2 (21-25), p < 0.0001] and transition zone (TZ) length [2.2 (1-3) to 2.5 (1-4), p = 0.004] were longer. Bolus clearance was inversely correlated with TZ length (p = 0.0002) and time from swallow onset to proximal smooth muscle initiation (p < 0.0001). Bolus clearance and UES characteristics were unchanged (p > 0.05). Increased outflow resistance after LNF required an increased DCI. However, this increased contractile vigor was achieved through sustained, not stronger, peristaltic contractions. Increased esophageal length was associated with increased TZ and delayed initiation of smooth muscle contractions.

Pediatric Esophageal Foreign Bodies: The Role of Socioeconomic Status in Ingestion Patterns.

Pediatric esophageal foreign bodies (EFBs) are common and can result in serious complications. Little is known about the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) on EFB ingestion in children. The goal was to study SES as a risk factor for dangerous foreign body ingestion and in-hospital complications in children. This was a retrospective cohort study of children presenting to a tertiary care pediatric hospital with an esophageal foreign body from 2010 to 2021. SES was assessed for each patient by linking their postal code to the Ontario Marginalization Index to determine a quintile score across four dimensions of deprivation: residential instability, material deprivation, dependency, and ethnic concentration. Dangerous EFBs were defined as magnets, batteries, sharp objects, or bones. In-hospital complications included: intensive care unit admission, prolonged length of stay, and postoperative sequelae. A total of 680 patients were included. Dangerous EFB ingestion was higher for children with increased residential instability (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.6) and increased material deprivation (OR, 2.2; CI, 1.9-2.8), which was similarly true for odds of complications. Odds of dangerous EFB ingestion were higher in older children (OR, 1.1; CI, 1.0-1.1) and odds of complications were higher in children with comorbidities (OR, 1.1; CI, 1.0-1.3). Higher levels of housing instability and material deprivation are associated with dangerous EFB ingestion and complications related to EFB ingestion. These findings emphasize the role that SES plays on child health outcomes and the need for initiatives to mitigate these disparities. 3 Laryngoscope, 134:2945-2953, 2024.

Endoscopic Extraction of an Unusual Foreign Body at the Somine Dolo Hospital in Mopti

The esophagus is the most common site of impaction of an ingested foreign body. The main initial symptom is acute dysphagia; Patients with complete esophageal obstruction produce excessive amounts of saliva and are unable to swallow oral secretions. Complete obstruction can cause pressure necrosis and increases the risk of perforation if present for more than approximately 24 hours. Emergency endoscopy is necessary for sharp objects, disc or button batteries, and any obstruction causing symptoms that suggest complete obstruction. We report through this observation the extraction of an unusual esophageal foreign body at the Sominé Dolo hospital in Mopti. This was a 60-year-old patient, a farmer, with no known medical or surgical history to date, and no particular psychiatric disorder. The accidentally ingested foreign body was a cap from a recycled vinegar bottle. An attempt at extraction in the ENT department was made without success, then subsequently sent to the Hepato-gastroenterology unit. The endoscopic extraction of the foreign body was carried out without incident and the evolution was favorable after the endoscopy procedure.

Incidence of Esophageal Foreign Body and its Complication at Tertiary Care Hospital

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research is to investigate the types of foreign body ingestion in esophagus and its complications in tertiary care hospital. Design: Prospective study Setting and duration: This study was carried out in department of E.N.T and Head and Neck surgery Abbasi Shaheed Hospital from 3rd February 2016 to 30th September 2021. METHODOLOGY: During this period, 305 patients were selected for this study after fulfil the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Male were 177 (58%), male and female ratio was 1.3:1. 162 (53%) patients came with foreign body in esophagus were between the ages of 0-10 years followed by 11-20 years of age 35 (11.4%) cases. Commonest site of foreign body impaction was cricopharynx, noted in 59% patients. Commonest foreign body in esophagus was coin, 122 (40%) cases followed by meat bolus 34 (11%) and bone chip 33 (10.8%). Below 10 years of age, the most common foreign body was coin found in 110 (36%) patients. Above 71 years, denture found in 16 (5.24%) patients. The overall incidence of complications was noted in 17 (5.5%) patients and the most common complication was bruise, 13 (4.2%) patients. In 8 cases (2.6%) bruise was noted in cervical part of esophagus, while in 1 case perforation was noted in thoracic part of esophagus.0.3%. CONCLUSION: Esophageal foreign body is very common in ENT practice especially in children. It can be harmful to children if they swallowed. Foreign body should remove as earliest to prevent complications.

Endoscopic removal of esophageal foreign body and endoscopic closure of its associated perforation with early mediastinitis.

A 55-year-old male swallowed fish bone accidentally and subsequently developed retrosternal pain. He underwent chest computed tomography at his local hospital on October 23, 2023, showing esophageal foreign body with suspected esophageal rupture. One day later, he underwent endoscopy at our department, showing a fish bone penetrated into the esophageal wall. After consultation with cardiothoracic surgeons, endoscopy-guided removal of this foreign body was performed under anesthesia. An esophageal ulcer with a length of 2cm was left with overflowing air bubbles, and was closed by three metal clips. Two days later, retrosternal pain disappeared. A tube was intubated to duodenal distal segment under endoscopy, via which enteral nutritional suspension was given. Then, he was discharged.

Esophageal motor abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disorders.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a prevalent condition with multifactorial pathogenesis, involves esophageal motor dysmotility as a key contributing factor to its development. When suspected GERD patients have an inadequate response to proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and normal upper endoscopy results, high-resolution manometry (HRM) is utilized to rule out alternative diagnosis such as achalasia spectrum disorders, rumination, or supragastric belching. At present, HRM continues to provide supportive evidence for diagnosing GERD and determining the appropriate treatment. This review focuses on the existing understanding of the connection between esophageal motor findings and the pathogenesis of GERD, along with the significance of esophageal HRM in managing GERD patients. The International GERD Consensus Working Group introduced a three-step method, assessing the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), esophageal body motility, and contraction reserve with multiple rapid swallow (MRS) maneuvers. Crucial HRM abnormalities in GERD include frequent transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations, disrupted EGJ, and esophageal body hypomotility. Emerging HRM metrics like EGJ-contractile integral and innovative provocative maneuver like straight leg raise have the potential to enhance our understanding of factors contributing to GERD, thereby increasing the value of HRM performed in patients who experience symptoms suspected of GERD.

The Clinical Efficacy, and Long-Term Outcomes Between Pneumatic Dilation and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy in Achalasia.

Introduction: Achalasia is the most well-known motility disorder, characterized by the lack of optimal relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter during swallowing and the absence of peristalsis of the esophageal body. Laparoscopic Heller esocardiomyotomy (LHM) and pneumatic dilation (PD) were the main treatment options for achalasia. Currently, the therapeutic methods are complemented by per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Materials and Methods: we performed a retrospective study, analyzing the data and evolution of 98 patients with achalasia, admited and treated in the General and Esophageal Surgery Clinic of the St. Mary Clinical Hospital-Bucharest between January 2016 and June 2023. The treatment was performed by PD in 25 cases and the majority LHM. The average duration of symptoms in the case of PD was 48 months, and 24 months in LHM. The patients were evaluated before and after the treatment procedures by the Eckardt clinical score and investigations such as timed barium esophagogram (TBO) and esophageal manometry. Results: Although patients had the same Eckardt score before treatment, a statistically significant decrease of the Eckardt score was obtained at the post-therapeutic evaluation after undergoing LHM compared to PD. Recurrence of symptoms was more frequent in the case of PD, requiring another therapeutic intervention. The cost of treatment, as well as the number of hospitalization days were reduced in the case of PD. Conclusions: The treatment of achalasia with LHM is more effective regarding recurrence of symptoms, even if it involves higher costs and a longer hospital stay compared to DP.

Alteraciones de la motilidad esofágica

Esophageal motility disorders (EMD) manifest clinically with the presence of dysphagia and/or chest pain related to swallowing. In order to diagnose it, it is necessary to first rule out organic causes that would explain these symptoms. In recent decades, the development of high-resolution manometry and its use in routine clinical practice has allowed for better characterization of esophageal motility disorders. The diagnostic criteria have been updated in recent years in the Chicago Classification v4.0, which establishes two large groups of motor disorders: those with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) and those with abnormal esophageal body contractility. The treatment of EMDs with EGJOO (the various presentations of achalasia and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction) is aimed at reducing the baseline pressure in this area. Various techniques are available for this, such as pneumatic balloon dilatation, endoscopic (POEM) and surgical myotomy (Heller myotomy), and, less frequently, the use of oral drugs and botulinum toxin injection. In the case of esophageal peristalsis disorders, the goal of treatment is to control symptoms. To do so, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used in patients with associated gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and, in the case of disorders associated with hypercontractility, other drugs such as nitrates or calcium channel blockers and, occasionally, low-dose tricyclic antidepressants may be used.

Presence of esophageal contractility after achalasia treatment is associated with improved esophageal emptying.

Some achalasia patients exhibit esophageal contractile activity on follow-up after treatment, yet its importance remains unclear. We aimed to identify factors associated with presence of contractility after treatment and to assess its impact on timed barium esophagram (TBE) and clinical outcomes. Patients with type I or II achalasia on baseline high-resolution manometry (HRM) who completed HRM, TBE, and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) after treatment were retrospectively identified. Contractility was defined on post-treatment HRM as presence of at least 1 supine swallow with DCI ≥100 mmHg s cm. One hundred twenty-two patients were included (mean age 48 ± 17 years, 50% female). At follow-up evaluation after treatment (54% peroral endoscopic myotomy, 24% pneumatic dilation, 22% laparoscopic Heller myotomy), 61 (50%) patients had contractility on HRM. Patients with contractility (compared to those without) more frequently had type II achalasia (84% vs 57%, p = 0.001) and a post-treatment normal EGJ opening classification on FLIP (69% vs 49%; p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients with post-treatment integrated relaxation pressure <15 mmHg and normal EGJ opening on FLIP (n = 53), those with contractility had a lower median column height on TBE at 1 min (4 vs 7 cm, p = 0.002) and 5 min (0 vs 5 cm, p = 0.001). In patients with "abnormal" EGJ metrics, patients with contractility showed lower symptom scores (median Eckardt score 2 vs 3, p = 0.03). Occurring more frequently in type II achalasia, and if adequate EGJ opening is achieved after treatment, esophageal contractility may contribute to improved esophageal emptying and improved symptoms in non-spastic achalasia. Preservation of esophageal body muscle could improve outcomes in these patients.

Unusual esophageal foreign body: Metal bottle cap

Foreign body of esophagus is frequently an emergency encountered in gastroenter-oogy clinic practice. Endoscopic treatment is effective and safe. Metal bottle cap is rarely swallowed. Metal bottle cap extraction presents a challenge in the manage-ment also, endoscopic treatment should be done quickly since metal bottle cap is quite large and sharp object. Here, we presented a very rare cause foreign body -a metal bottle cap- in the upper esophagus which was extracted using alligator jaw grasping forceps.

Accurate localization and successful treatment of 23 cases of migrating pharynx and cervical esophageal foreign bodies

Objective: To explore clinical features, diagnosis, localization, and therapeutic strategy of migratory pharyngeal and cervical esophageal foreign bodies. Methods: A total 23 cases of pharyngeal and cervical esophageal migratory foreign bodies were admitted between January 2015 and December 2021. There were 14 females and 9 males with the age ranged from 35 to 82 (55.0±12.7)years. In all the cases, esophageal CT was taken to confirm the esophageal foreign body. Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) was performed to locate the foreign body from the horizontal, coronal and sagittal dimensions as well as the corrected reconstructed MPR. According to the location of the foreign body, appropriate surgical method was selected.The symptoms, complications, types of foreign body, positioning, surgical methods, and relevant information were recorded.Data were analyzed using the descriptive method and SPSS 25.0 software. Results: The clinical symptoms of 23 migrating esophageal foreign bodies included pharyngodynia (20/23), foreign body sensation (6/23), hoarsenss (1/23), difficulty in turning neck(1/23), difficulty in opening mouth (1/23), fever (7/23), poor appetite (1/23), and abdominal pain (1/23). The foreign bodies included 19 fish bones, 2 wires, 1 embroidery needle and 1 chicken bone. There were 9 cases (39.1%) of foreign bodies located in extraluminal cervical esophagus, 2 cases (8.7%) of foreign bodies located in the muscular layer of the cervical esophagus and 12 cases (52.2%) of foreign bodies located in pharynx. Twenty-one cases of foreign bodies were removed by cervical lateral incision, in which 11 were removed by cervical lateral incision directly, 10 by the second lateral cervical incision after the foreign bodies were accurately located by MPR and/or corrected MPR, 1 foreign body was removed by incision of the pharyngeal mucosa under suspension laryngoscope, 1 foreign body was removed by tracheoscopy. Compared with patients with intraluminal foreign bodies (n=308) treated in the same period, intake of fishbone [19 (19/23) vs. 133 (82.6% (43.2%, 133/308), OR=7.31] and first visit was more than 24 hours [20(87.0%, 20/23) vs. 77(25.0%, 77/308),OR=17.2] were the significant risk factors of migratory esophageal foreign bodies. Conclusions: MPR and the corrected MPR can accurately locate the migrating pharyngeal and cervical esophageal foreign bodies, by providing more intuitive imaging evidence for doctors, which provide imaging basis for formulation of surgical programs. Foreign bodies in pharyngeal and cervical esophagus need to be treated as soon as possible, otherwise they are easy to migrate, leading lead to serious complications.