Board Of Surgery Research Articles

Update on Educational Resources and Evaluation Tools for Orthopaedic Surgery Residents.

Innovations in orthopaedic resident educational resources and evaluation tools are essential to ensuring appropriate training and ultimately the graduation of competent orthopaedic surgeons. In recent years, there have been several advancements in comprehensive educational platforms within orthopaedic surgery. Orthobullets PASS, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Clinical Classroom, and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery Resident Orthopaedic Core Knowledge each have their own unique advantages in preparation for the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination and American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery board certification examinations. In addition, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones 2.0 and the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Knowledge Skills Behavior program each provide objective assessment of resident core competencies. Understanding and using these new platforms will help orthopaedic residents, faculty, residency programs, and program leadership to best train and evaluate their residents.

Early findings and strategies for successful implementation of SIMPL workplace-based assessments within vascular surgery residency and fellowship programs

ObjectiveAs medical education systems increasingly move toward competency-based training, it is important to understand the tools available to assess competency and how these tools are utilized. The Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning (SIMPL) offers a smart phone-based assessment system that supports workplace-based assessment of residents’ and fellows’ operative autonomy, performance, and case complexity. The purpose of this study was to characterize implementation of the SIMPL app within vascular surgery integrated residency (0+5) and fellowship (5+2) training programs. MethodsSIMPL operative ratings recorded between 2018 and 2022 were collected from all participating vascular surgery training institutions (n = 9 institutions with 5+2 and 0+5 programs; n = 4 institutions with 5+2 program only). The characteristics of programs, trainees, faculty, and SIMPL operative assessments were evaluated using descriptive statistics. ResultsOperative assessments were completed for 2457 cases by 85 attendings and 86 trainees, totaling 4615 unique operative assessment ratings. Attendings included dictated feedback in 52% of assessments. Senior-level residents received more assessments than junior-level residents (postgraduate year [PGY]1-3, n = 439; PGY4-5, n = 551). Performance ratings demonstrated increases from junior to senior trainees for both resident and fellow cohorts with “performance-ready” or “exceptional performance” ratings increasing by nearly two-fold for PGY1 to PGY5 residents (28.1% vs 40.6%), and from first- to second-year fellows (PGY6, 46.7%; PGY7, 60.3%). Similar gains in autonomy were demonstrated as trainees progressed through training. Senior residents were more frequently granted autonomy with “supervision only” than junior residents (PGY1, 8.7%; PGY5, 21.6%). “Supervision only” autonomy ratings were granted to 21.8% of graduating fellows. Assessment data included a greater proportion of complex cases for senior compared with junior fellows (PGY6, 20.9% vs PGY7, 26.5%). Program Directors felt that faculty and trainee buy-in were the main barriers to implementation of the SIMPL assessment app. ConclusionsThis is the first description of the SIMPL app as an operative assessment tool within vascular surgery that has been successfully implemented in both residency and fellowship programs. The assessment data demonstrates expected progressive gains in trainees’ autonomy and performance, as well as increasing case complexity, across PGY years. Given the selection of SIMPL as the assessment platform for required American Board of Surgery and Vascular Surgery Board Entrustable Professional Activities assessments, understanding facilitators and barriers to implementation of workplace-based assessments using this app is imperative, particularly as we move toward competency-based medical education.

A Novel Do-It-Yourself Approach to Simulating Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Surgery.

In 2008, the American Board of Surgery required residents to pass a laparoscopic fundamentals examination to sit for the boards. As such, minimally invasive surgery became the newest addition as a requisite skill for surgical trainees. To assist in preparing trainees for future surgery, simulation devices have been integrated into training programs to develop proficiency with laparoscopic and arthroscopic techniques. While effective, one of the biggest obstacles to accessing these devices is the thousands of dollars required for the equipment. Many commercial and do-it-yourself (DIY) iterations of low-cost, portable, laparoscopic simulators have been described to address this. While the price point ranges from 300 to 400 dollars, these DIY simulators primarily utilize webcams, iPhones, and tablet cameras in a fixed position. This presents an inherent limitation in the simulator's accuracy as current laparoscopy surgery utilizes camera motion. This study presents a novel DIY simulator that portrays a more realistic view of the operative field using camera motion and positioning, costing approximately 200 dollars. This proposed simulator uses a Universal Serial Bus (USB) endoscope with interchangeable side mirrors. We inserted an endoscope with built-in light-emitting diode (LED) lights into a seamless stainless tube for the laparoscope and attached it to a computer for configuration. To simulate the abdominal cavity, holes were drilled into a ½ torso hollow mannequin at the standard port locations for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and rubber grommets were inserted into the drilled holes. Trocars were constructed using cross-linked polyethylene (PEX) tubing and #8 rubber stoppers. By creating a more affordable and easily constructed model, acquiring laparoscopic skills is more accessible. Simulators are becoming an essential part of medical training. Affordable simulators like ours allow trainees to develop their laparoscopic skill set at their own pace and convenience. More research into this can potentially lead to increased exposure to more accurate simulators and facilitate more accessible training for performing minimally invasive surgery in any surgical specialty.

European Board of Hand Surgery (EBHS) Examination Questions.

European Board of Hand Surgery (EBHS) Examination Questions.

5. Evolving Practices in Rhytidectomy: A 16-year Review of Continuous Certification Tracer Data from the American Board Of Plastic Surgery

5. Evolving Practices in Rhytidectomy: A 16-year Review of Continuous Certification Tracer Data from the American Board Of Plastic Surgery

Predictive factors of first-time failure on the American Board of Colorectal Surgery certifying and qualifying examinations

Objective To discover if first-attempt failure of the American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery (ABCRS) board examination is associated with surgical training or personal demographic characteristics. Methods Current colon and rectal surgery program directors in the United States were contacted via email. Deidentified records of trainees from 2011 to 2019 were requested. Analysis was performed to identify associations between individual risk factors and failure on the ABCRS board examination on the first attempt. Results Seven programs contributed data, totaling 67 trainees. The overall first-time pass rate was 88% (n = 59). Several variables demonstrated potential for association, including Colon and Rectal Surgery In-Training Examination (CARSITE) percentile (74.5 vs 68.0, P = 0.09), number of major cases in colorectal residency (245.0 vs 219.2, P = 0.16), >5 publications during colorectal residency (75.0% vs 25.0%, P = 0.19), and first-time passage of the American Board of Surgery certifying examination (92.5% vs 7.5%, P = 0.18). Conclusion The ABCRS board examination is a high-stakes test, and training program factors may be predictive of failure. Although several factors showed potential for association, none reached statistical significance. Our hope is that by increasing our data set, we will identify statistically significant associations that can potentially benefit future trainees in colon and rectal surgery.

The position of the Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery

The position of the Vascular Surgery Board of the American Board of Surgery

Practice Patterns in Primary Breast Augmentation: A 16-Year Review of Continuous Certification Tracer Data from the American Board of Plastic Surgery.

As part of the continuous certification process, the American Board of Plastic Surgery collects case data for specific tracer procedures in aesthetic surgery to assess practice improvement by the diplomates. These case-based data provide valuable information on national trends in clinical practice. The current study was performed to analyze practice patterns in aesthetic primary breast augmentation. Breast augmentation tracer data were reviewed from 2005 to 2021 and grouped into an early cohort (EC), from 2005 through 2014, and a recent cohort (RC), from 2015 through 2021. Fisher exact tests and two-sample t tests compared demographic characteristics of the patients, surgical techniques, and complication rates. Patients in the RC were slightly older (34 versus 35 years; P < 0.001), more likely to have ptosis greater than 22 cm (20% versus 23%; P < 0.0001), less likely to smoke (12% versus 8%; P < 0.0001), and less likely to undergo a preoperative mammogram (29% versus 24%; P < 0.0001). From a technical standpoint, inframammary incisions have become more common (68% versus 80%; P < 0.0001), whereas periareolar incision use has decreased (24% versus 14%; P < 0.0001). Submuscular plane placement has increased (22% versus 56%; P < 0.0001), while subglandular placement has decreased (19% versus 7%; P < 0.0001). Silicone implants are most popular (58% versus 82%; P < 0.0001). Textured implant use increased from 2011 (2%) to 2016 (16%), followed by a sharp decline to 0% by 2021. Trends follow U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals and warnings. This study highlights evolving trends in aesthetic breast augmentation over the past 16 years. The most common technique remains a smooth silicone prosthesis placed in the subpectoral plane through an inframammary incision.

Clinical Practice Patterns in Abdominoplasty: 16-Year Analysis of Continuous Certification Data from the American Board of Plastic Surgery.

The authors evaluated trends in practice patterns for abdominoplasty based on a 16-year review of tracer data collected by the American Board of Plastic Surgery as part of the continuous certification process. To facilitate comparison of an equal number of patients over time, tracer data from 2005 to 2021 were split into an early cohort (EC) (from 2005 to 2014) and a recent cohort (RC) (from 2015 to 2021). Fisher exact tests and two-sample t tests were used to compare patient demographics, surgical techniques, and complication rates. Data from 8990 abdominoplasties (EC, n = 4740; RC, n = 4250) were analyzed. RC abdominoplasties report a lower rate of complications (RC, 19%; EC, 22%; P < 0.001) and a lower rate of revision surgery (RC 8%; EC, 10%; P < 0.001). This has occurred despite the increased use of abdominal flap liposuction (RC, 25%; EC, 18%; P < 0.001). There has been a decline in the use of wide undermining (81% versus 75%; P < 0.001), vertical plication of the abdomen (89% versus 86%; P < 0.001), and surgical drains (93% versus 89%; P < 0.001). Abdominoplasty surgery is increasingly performed in an outpatient setting, with increased use of chemoprophylaxis for thrombosis prevention. Analysis of these American Board of Plastic Surgery tracer data highlights important trends in clinical practice over the past 16 years. Abdominoplasty continues to be a safe and effective procedure with similar complication and revision rates over the 16-year period.

How Consistent are International Rotations Between Plastic Surgery Training Programs?

All 101 integrated and independent plastic surgery program directors/coordinators were asked to participate. The survey identified the requirements and details of existing international rotations. In total, 57 programs responded (56% response rate) to the survey. An estimated 54% of all programs offered international rotations to their residents, and 94% of these programs obtained institutional approval. Additionally, 69% of these programs have received national approval. Institutional requirements for programs to provide international rotations vary significantly across institutions, which results in disparate experiences for residents and poses potential risks to international partners. This study will help promote transparency regarding international rotation requirements and better equip faculty to enhance international rotations that cater to the needs of the institution, residents, and most importantly, the host countries.

ENTRUST: A Serious Game-Based Virtual Patient Platform to Assess Entrustable Professional Activities in Graduate Medical Education.

As entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are implemented in graduate medical education, there is a great need for tools to efficiently and objectively evaluate clinical competence. Readiness for entrustment in surgery requires not only assessment of technical ability, but also the critical skill of clinical decision-making. We report the development of ENTRUST, a serious game-based, virtual patient case creation and simulation platform to assess trainees' decision-making competence. A case scenario and corresponding scoring algorithm for the Inguinal Hernia EPA was iteratively developed and aligned with the description and essential functions outlined by the American Board of Surgery. In this study we report preliminary feasibility data and validity evidence. In January 2021, the case scenario was deployed and piloted on ENTRUST with 19 participants of varying surgical expertise levels to demonstrate proof of concept and initial validity evidence. Total score, preoperative sub-score, and intraoperative sub-score were analyzed by training level and years of medical experience using Spearman rank correlations. Participants completed a Likert scale user acceptance survey (1=strongly agree to 7=strongly disagree). Median total score and intraoperative mode sub-score were higher with each progressive level of training (rho=0.79, P<.001 and rho=0.69, P=.001, respectively). There were significant correlations between performance and years of medical experience for total score (rho=0.82, P<.001) and intraoperative sub-scores (rho=0.70, P<.001). Participants reported high levels of platform engagement (mean 2.06) and ease of use (mean 1.88). Our study demonstrates feasibility and early validity evidence for ENTRUST as an assessment platform for clinical decision-making.

The History of Women Leaders in Colon and Rectal Surgery.

Women started to enter the specialty of colon and rectal surgery in the early 1970s. However, it was rare for a woman to hold a leadership position in the specialty before 2000. Since then, considerable progress has been made, although the percentage of women leaders does not yet approach the percentage of women in the field. This article focuses on the history of women in leadership positions in the American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery, the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Research Foundation, and the Association of Program Directors in Colon and Rectal Surgery as well the Diseases of the Colon and Rectum and academic departments. Early women leaders shared some common attributes that have contributed to their success. This article reviews some barriers to increasing the number of women in leadership positions; most will be reviewed in other sections in this issue.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 and the Yale Response: A Semistructured Interview Study on Plastic Surgery Resident Education and Departmental Adaptation to the Lockdown.

Sooner-than-expected progression to statewide lockdown at the height of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic left minimal time for medical specialty boards, including The American Board of Plastic Surgery, to issue guidance for their respective programs. As a result, programs were tasked with developing creative alternatives to their standard resident curricula and department schedules. To capture attending and resident experience of the coronavirus disease 2019 lockdown in narrative form and to understand what specific changes enacted to maintain adequate education should be considered for continuation after the pandemic's conclusion. Qualitative, semistructured interviews of residents, fellows, and faculty of the Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery during 2019 to 2020 academic year were conducted on the following topics: (1) general reflection on lockdown, (2) resident maintenance of daily logs, (3) multi-institutional collaborative lectures, (4) modified didactic curriculum, (5) virtual 3-dimensional craniofacial planning sessions, (6) maintenance of department camaraderie, and (7) effect on preparation to become a surgeon. Twenty interviews (response rate 77%) were conducted between October 2020 and February 2021. Of residents, 100% felt observing the craniofacial planning sessions was beneficial, with many explicitly noting it provided a unique perspective into the surgeon's thought process behind planned manipulations, to which they usually are not privy. Of residents, 100% felt confident at the time of the interview that the lockdown would have no lasting effects on their preparation to become a surgeon. Rapid changes enacted at Yale enabled resident training to advance, and documentation of the success of these changes can inform future curriculum design.

Operative Autonomy in a Gender-Balanced Cohort of Surgical Trainees.

Gender inequity continues to be a major focus of improvements within surgical education. Female trainees are fewer and experience reduced quality of surgical training. Prior studies have demonstrated that surgical autonomy for female trainees in a range of surgical disciplines is less than that of male trainees. As a unique example among Australasian specialty training boards, the New Zealand Board of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery has boasted a gender-balanced cohort of surgical trainees since 2013. The authors sought to examine the effect of gender on surgical autonomy in a cohort of trainees where gender balance has been achieved. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken. Anonymized logbook data for New Zealand plastic surgery trainees were analyzed, for the study period, consisting of rotations from December of 2013 to June of 2020. Self-reported levels of trainee supervision were compared against gender. Outcomes were tested using multivariate analysis. Thirty-eight trainees were included in the study (58% female), with a total of 81,178 cases recorded over the 6.5-year study period. No overall statistically significant difference in surgical autonomy was identified when analyzed by gender. Male and female trainees showed similar trends of increasing surgical autonomy throughout the course of surgical training. In a cohort of surgical trainees that has reached gender balance, the negative impact of gender on surgical autonomy was not identified. These findings suggest that where women make up an equal proportion of trainees, the implicit gender bias within surgical training may be ameliorated.

Plastic Surgery Roles in Wound Centers in the Northeastern United States.

Wound care is a substantial industry costing nearly $19 billion USD, and dedicated wound care centers play a critical role via a multidisciplinary team-based approach. At the same time, plastic surgeons are often considered experts in evaluation and management of wounds, particularly chronic and complex wounds. However, the extent of direct involvement of plastic surgeons in wound care centers is unclear. In this study, we sought to evaluate the presence of plastic surgeons and other specialties in wound care centers across all Northeastern states Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, West Virginia, and Vermont. A comprehensive list of wound care clinics in northeastern United States was obtained from the Healogics website. For each site, information was gathered via website listings, including number of providers and the professional certification/specialization for each provider. Providers were those with qualifications including Doctor of Medicine (MD), Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO), Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT), Doctor of Podiatric Medicine (DPM), Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA), Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner (CRNP), Physician Associate (PA), and Physical Therapist (PT). A total of 118 Healogics wound care clinics and 492 providers were located across 14 northeastern states including District of Columbia. After researching each location, updated in November 2022, plastic surgeons were only 3.7% (18 of 492) providers employed. Specialties such as internal medicine (90 of 492 [18%]), general surgery (76 of 492 [15%]), podiatry (68 of 292 [13.8% ]), and other midlevel providers such as nurse practitioners (35 of 492 [7.1%]) were more frequently employed over plastic surgery. All plastic surgeons were board certified the American Board of Plastic Surgery. Wound care requires collaboration between specialties, with significant repercussions on health care costs and patient outcomes. Plastic surgery provides unique surgical services for the healing of wounds, and the natural expectation would be that plastic surgery should be heavily involved at wound care centers. However, the data do not reflect significant involvement at an official level. Further studies will investigate causes and the societal, financial, and patient impacts of this lack of direct engagement. Although many plastic surgeons may not desire the majority of their practice to be wound care management, it stands to reason that some affiliation, at least for patient awareness and referral, may be warranted.

European Board of Hand Surgery (EBHS) Examination Questions.

European Board of Hand Surgery (EBHS) Examination Questions.

A 16-Year Review of Clinical Practice Patterns in Liposuction Based on Continuous Certification by the American Board of Plastic Surgery.

The American Board of Plastic Surgery has collected data on cosmetic surgery tracers as part of the Continuous Certification process since 2005. The current study was performed to analyze evolving trends in liposuction from the American Board of Plastic Surgery database. Tracer data from 2005 through 2021 were reviewed and grouped into an early cohort (EC) (2005-2014) and a recent cohort (RC) (2015-2021). Fisher exact tests and two-sample t tests were used to compare patient demographics, techniques, and complications. A total of 2810 suction-assisted liposuction cases were included (1150 EC, 1660 RC). In-office procedures increased (36% EC versus 41% RC). The use of general anesthesia remained the same (63% EC versus 62% RC). The use of power-assisted liposuction increased (24% EC versus 40% RC) and use of ultrasound-assisted liposuction decreased (5% versus 2%). With respect to body areas treated, liposuction of the abdomen (64% EC versus 69% RC), flanks (60% EC versus 64% RC), and back (22% EC versus 34% RC) increased; treatments of thighs (36% EC versus 23% RC), and knees (8% EC versus 5% RC) decreased. Intraoperative position changes are more common (30% EC versus 37% RC), as is liposuction of multiple areas in one case (28% EC versus 36% RC). The volume of lipoaspirate also increased (1150 cc EC versus 1660 cc RC). This study highlights evolving trends in liposuction over 16 years. Liposuction is becoming more common as an outpatient procedure performed concomitantly with other procedures. Despite multiple emerging technologies, the popularity of power-assisted liposuction is increasing. Although adverse events have not significantly increased with these changes, the authors stress careful preoperative evaluation of patients to identify factors that increase the risk of complications.

Current Practices and Trends in Midface Rejuvenation.

Cosmetic approaches to midface aging are complex and vary in their treatment methodology. The nature of cosmetic surgery limits clinical trial data, forcing surgeons to rely on small studies and professional preferences when choosing an approach. Our study aimed to quantitatively assess national trends in midface rejuvenation practices. We conducted a cross-sectional study consisting of a survey administered through the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons listservs. To evaluate trends, techniques were grouped into 2 categories: minimally invasive (injectable fillers, fat transfer, fat repositioning) or invasive (deep plane facelift, subperiosteal lift, malar/cheek alloplastic implant, bone grafting/bone advancement). Two hundred thirty-two survey responses were received. Of the total respondents, 46.52% were certified by the American Board of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and 48.26% were certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery. Minimally invasive techniques were far more preferred (66.67%) over invasive (33.33%) techniques, with injectable fillers as the most common technique (34.88%), followed by fat transfer (20.93%). Deep plane facelift was preferred over subperiosteal lift (18.60% vs 7.91%, respectively). Surgeons board certified by the American Board of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery were more inclined to perform invasive techniques over those board certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery (P = 0.0427). This study quantitatively assessed national trends in cosmetic approaches to midface aging. Our data suggest that trends among surgeons across the United States have shifted toward favoring minimally invasive techniques over more invasive approaches.

The Advanced Certifying Exam Simulation-Pro assessment instrument: evaluating surgical trainee examsmanship in virtual oral exams.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many educational activities in general surgery residency have shifted to a virtual environment, including the American Board of Surgery (ABS) Certifying Exam. Virtual exams may become the new standard. In response, we developed an evaluation instrument, the ACES-Pro, to assess surgical trainee performance with a focus on examsmanship in virtual oral board examinations. The purpose of this study was two-fold: (1) to assess the utility and validity of the evaluation instrument, and (2) to characterize the unique components of strong examsmanship in the virtual setting, which has distinct challenges when compared to in-person examsmanship. We developed a 15-question evaluation instrument, the ACES-Pro, to assess oral board performance in the virtual environment. Nine attending surgeons viewed four pre-recorded oral board exam scenarios and scored examinees using this instrument. Evaluations were compared to assess for inter-rater reliability. Faculty were also surveyed about their experience using the instrument. Pilot evaluators found the ACES-Pro instrument easy to use and felt it appropriately captured key professionalism metrics of oral board exam performance. We found acceptable inter-rater reliability in the domains of verbal communication, non-verbal communication, and effective use of technology (Guttmann's lambda-2 were 0.796, 0.916, and 0.739, respectively). The ACES-Pro instrument is an assessment with evidence for validity as understood by Kane's framework to evaluate multiple examsmanship domains in the virtual exam setting. Examinees must consider best practices for virtual examsmanship to perform well in this environment. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-023-00107-7.

Trends in Integrated Plastic Surgery Applicant, Resident, and Junior Attending Research Productivity

IntroductionResearch productivity is critical for matching into integrated plastic surgery residency. This study will identify how pre and intraresidency research productivity correlate with resident/junior attending productivity. Materials and methodsRetrospective review from 2006 to 2015 issues of the American Board of Plastic Surgery's Annual Newsletter to Diplomates was performed to identify newly board certified plastic surgeons. Only surgeons from US medical schools matching directly into integrated programs were included. Residency type/length, graduation year from medical school, and publication counts were recorded for each surgeon. Publications were categorized as preresidency, intraresidency, and junior attending (6 y post residency/fellowship training). ResultsSix hundred fifty-five integrated plastic surgery graduates were analyzed. The median number of total publications (preresidency, intraresidency, and junior attending) was 4 (interquartile range [IQR], 1 to 10). Linear regression revealed negligible correlation between preresidency and junior attending publications (r = 0.019, P = 0.002). Total publications and increasing graduation y had a significant correlation of 0.89 (P < 0.001). Graduates of fellowships had significantly increased median total publications compared to those without fellowships (7 IQR, 3 to 18 versus 3 IQR, 1 to 7, respectively, P < 0.001). Dedicated research years during residency were associated with significant (P < 0.001) increases in median total and junior attending publications. Total publications ranged from 3 (IQR, 1 to 6) to 8 (IQR, 7 to 18) for those who completed 5- and 8-y residencies, respectively. ConclusionsIncreased preresidency research productivity is not strongly associated with increased junior attending productivity in integrated plastic surgery. Better markers are completing dedicated research years in residency or fellowship after residency.