Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury Research Articles

Endovascular repair for acute aortic syndrome involving the descending aorta

This review paper delves into the acute aortic syndromes, with a particular focus on those affecting the descending thoracic aorta, including acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD), intramural hematoma (IMH), penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU), blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (bTAI), and ruptured aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta (rDTA). These conditions present with sudden-onset symptoms such as severe chest or back pain, necessitating immediate medical attention. While traditional open surgical repair was historically the mainstay of treatment, advancements in endovascular techniques have revolutionized management approaches. Endovascular treatment offers advantages such as reduced operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay, making it a safer option for high-risk patients. However, it is crucial to carefully evaluate patients for endovascular suitability, considering the potential complications and risks associated with these techniques. This paper aims to provide an updated overview of acute aortic syndromes involving the descending thoracic aorta, analyze available therapeutic options, and review contemporary treatment modalities, shedding light on the technical aspects and considerations guiding clinical decision-making in this complex and life-threatening scenario.

Surgeon-Modified Fenestrated Stent-grafts for Zone 2 Endovascular Repair of Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury: Early and Midterm Results.

Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is a highly fatal surgical emergency and is treated with endovascular procedures. We aimed to analyze and report the early and midterm outcomes of surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-grafts (SMFSG) compared with other conventional endovascular methods in patients with BTAI repaired with zone 2 endovascular surgery. Before and after the study was performed, from January 2015 to January 2020 for a period in which conventional endovascular treatments were used and from January 2020 to January 2023 for the second period in which the SMFSG technique was used. A total of 25 patients who underwent zone 2 endovascular repair for BTAI were included. The patients treated with conventional endovascular methods in the first period, chimney thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) (n=3 patients); Left subclavian artery (LSA)-covered (intentionally total) (n=12 patients) LSA-covered (LSAC) TEVAR; carotid-subclavian bypass TEVAR (n=2 patients) was defined as group 1, and the group of patients treated with SMFSG in the second period was defined as group 2. The primary endpoints of the study were technical success, defined as complete closure of BTAI, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were aortic pathology-related morbidity, mortality, and re-interventions during the follow-up period. The mean age was 42.6±14.3 years, and 21 (84%) of the patients were male. The patients were compared with respect to the proximal landing zone, fluoroscopy time, duration of the procedure, length of intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay, no statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups (p>0.05). The mean follow-up time of patients in group I was 46±9 months, while in group II, it was 14±6 months (p<0.001). While no TEVAR-related complications were detected in group II throughout follow-up, they occurred in 4 patients (28.6%) in group I. TEVAR is the most appropriate treatment for BTAI in the modern era, especially for polytrauma patients with successful outcomes. Intentional coverage of the LSA can be performed, but SMFSG is an effective, economical, rapid, and available technique for endovascular revascularization of the LSA. Altough intentional left subclavian artery coverage is preferred routinely in patients with blunt traumatic aortic injury (in Zone 2) which is a highly fatal surgical emergency, surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-grafts is also effective, economical, rapid and available technique.

Impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair following blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury on blood pressure

BackgroundBlunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs) are associated with a high mortality rate. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the most frequently used surgical strategy in patients with BTAI, as it offers good short- and middle-term results. Previous studies have reported an abnormally high prevalence of hypertension (HT) in these patients. This work aimed to describe the long-term prevalence of HT and provide a comprehensive evaluation of the biomechanical, clinical, and functional factors involved in HT development. MethodsTwenty-six patients treated with TEVAR following BTAI with no history of HT at the time of trauma were enrolled. They were matched with 37 healthy volunteers based on age, sex, and body surface area and underwent a comprehensive follow-up study, including cardiovascular magnetic resonance, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and assessment of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV, a measure of aortic stiffness) and flow-mediated vasodilation. ResultsThe mean patient age was 43.5 ± 12.9 years, and the majority were male (23 of 26; 88.5%). At a mean of 120.2 ± 69.7 months after intervention, 17 patients (65%) presented with HT, 14 (54%) had abnormal nighttime blood pressure dipping, and 6 (23%) high cfPWV. New-onset HT was related to a more proximal TEVAR landing zone and greater distal oversizing. Abnormal nighttime blood pressure was related to high cfPWV, which in turn was associated with TEVAR length and premature arterial aging. ConclusionsHT frequently occurs otherwise healthy subjects undergoing TEVAR implantation after BTAI. TEVAR stiffness and length, the proximal landing zone, and distal oversizing are potentially modifiable surgical characteristics related to abnormal blood pressure.

Endovascular therapy in blunt traumatic aortic injuries

Aim: Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTTAI) is a catastrophic life-threatening surgical emergency and the second most common cause of death in trauma patients. We retrospectively revealed our results for endovascularly treated BTTAI with early and long-term results. Material and Methods: During January 2009 and January 2022, patients from the emergency department with diagnosed BTTAI were retrospectively revealed. 38 patients all male except two, experienced BTTAI. 5 patients had grade IV, and 21 patients had grade III aortic injuries. Results: Mean age of the patients was 41.7±12.5 years. Technical success was 100%. Early mortality was 7.9%. The mean follow-up period was 49.7±18.3 months. In the follow-up period, there were no TEVAR-related complications. Conclusion: TEVAR is the most suitable treatment for BTTAI in the modern era. Left subclavian artery (LSA) intentional coverage may be performed however surgeon modified fenestrated stent graft (SMFSG) is an effective, economic, fast, and readily available technique for LSA revascularization without additional time.

Thoracic endovascular repair for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury: Long-term results.

This study aims to evaluate the endoprosthesis complications in patients undergoing TEVAR for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury, through long-term clinical and diagnostic follow-up. During the study interval (November 2000-October 2020), a total of 38 patients (63% male; average age 37.5years) with thoracic aortic injury underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Patients underwent routine follow-up with clinical examination and radiological evaluation (CT-angiography or MRI-angiography plus chest radiograph), scheduled at 1month, at 6months (only in the cases of thoracic aortic dissection), at 1year after the procedure and every 1year thereafter. Technical success was achieved in 38 procedures (100%). The TEVAR-related mortality rate was 0%. No immediate major complications related to the endovascular procedure were observed. The median duration of diagnostic follow-up was 80months. A total of four procedure-related complications (10.5%) were identified at the follow-up. Three (7.9%) distal infoldings and collapses of the thoracic endoprosthesis and one (2.6%) type Ia endoleak were observed. No thrombosis of the prosthesis, nor signs of aortic pseudocoarctation were identified. No further complications related to endograft (endoleaks, infections, rupture, partial or complete thrombosis) occurred. No changes in the native aorta, stenosis, or increases in the endograft's diameters were observed. A total of 20 patients (52.6%) underwent MRI-angiography examinations, while a total of 34 patients (89.5%) underwent chest radiographs at the follow-up. In all cases, CT-angiography examinations were performed at the follow-up. Procedure-related complications were observed within one year of TEVAR, limiting concerns related to the durability of the prosthesis. No morphological changes in the aorta were observed despite long-term follow-up. The consequences of lifelong surveillance in terms of radiation exposure deserve special consideration, especially in younger patients treated for TAI.

Observational management of Grade II or higher blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury: 15 years of experience at a single suburban institution.

Background:We aimed to investigate the outcomes after delayed management of ≥ Grade II blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTAI).Methods:Between January 2005 and December 2019, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 21 patients with ≥ Grade II thoracic aortic injury resulting from blunt trauma. Twelve patients underwent observation for the injury, whereas nine patients were transferred immediately after the diagnosis. Patients were divided into a nonoperative management group (n = 7) and delayed repair group (n = 5) based on whether they underwent thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair or surgery.Results:The most common dissection type was DeBakey classification IIIa (n = 9). Five patients underwent delayed surgery (including aneurysm repair), with observation periods ranging from 1 day to 36 months. The delayed repair group exhibited higher injury severity scores than the nonoperative management group (n = 7). The nonoperative management group was followed-up with blood pressure management without a change in status for a period ranging from 3 to 96 months.Conclusions:Our findings indicated that conservative management may be appropriate for select patients with Grade II/III BTAI, especially those exhibiting hemodynamic stability with anti-impulse therapy and minimally sized pseudoaneurysms. However, further studies are required to identify the risk factors for injury progression and long-term outcomes.

Geometric, Biomechanic and Haemodynamic Aortic Abnormalities Assessed by 4D Flow Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients Treated by TEVAR Following Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is widely used for the treatment of patients with blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTAI). However, aortic haemodynamic and biomechanical implications of this intervention are poorly investigated. This study aimed to assess whether patients treated by TEVAR following BTAI have thoracic aortic abnormalities in geometry, stiffness, and haemodynamics.

Geometric, Biomechanic and Haemodynamic Aortic Abnormalities Assessed by 4D Flow Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients Treated by TEVAR Following Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is widely used for the treatment of patients with blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTAI). However, aortic haemodynamic and biomechanical implications of this intervention are poorly investigated. This study aimed to assess whether patients treated by TEVAR following BTAI have thoracic aortic abnormalities in geometry, stiffness, and haemodynamics. Patients with BTAI treated by TEVAR at Vall d'Hebron Hospital between 1999 and 2019 were compared with propensity score matched healthy volunteers (HVs). All subjects underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) comprising a 4D flow CMR sequence. Spatially resolved aortic diameter, length, volume, and curvature were assessed. Pulse wave velocity, distensibility, and longitudinal strain (all measurements of aortic stiffness) were determined regionally. Moreover, advanced haemodynamic descriptors were quantified: systolic flow reversal ratio (SFRR), quantifying backward flow during systole, and in plane rotational flow (IRF), measuring in plane strength of helical flow. Twenty-six BTAI patients treated by TEVAR were included and matched with 26 HVs. They did not differ in terms of age, sex, and body surface area. Patients with TEVAR had a larger and longer ascending aorta (AAo) and marked abnormalities in local curvature. Aortic stiffness was greater in the aortic segments proximal and distal to TEVAR compared with controls. Moreover, TEVAR patients presented strongly altered flow dynamics compared with controls: a reduced IRF from the distal AAo to the proximal descending aorta and an increased SFRR in the whole thoracic aorta. These differences persisted adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors and were independent of time elapsed since TEVAR implantation. At long term follow up, previously healthy patients who underwent TEVAR implantation following BTAI had increased diameter, length and volume of the ascending aorta, and increased aortic stiffness and abnormal flow patterns in the whole thoracic aorta compared with matched controls. Further studies should address whether these alterations have clinical implications.

Open Repair versus Endovascular Repair of Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injuries : Short- and Mid-Term Outcomes

Open Repair versus Endovascular Repair of Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injuries : Short- and Mid-Term Outcomes

A multicenter study of emergency endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta: Indications and outcomes

ObjectiveEndovascular techniques have become an essential tool for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease (thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair [TEVAR]). The aim is to analyze the indications and outcomes of emergency TEVAR at national level in relation to elective surgery. Study design and scopeA retrospective multicenter registry of patients with descending thoracic aortic disease treated on an emergency basis using endovascular techniques between 2012–2016, in 11 clinical units. Patients, inclusion criteria1) Ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (RTAA); 2) Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (TAI); and 3) Complicated acute type B aortic dissections (TBADc). Primary variablesPatient mortality, survival and reoperation rate. Secondary variablesDemographic data, cardiovascular risk factors, specific data by indication, technical resources and postoperative complications. ResultsA total of 135 urgent TEVARs were included (111 men, mean age 60.4 ± 16.3 years): 43 ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms (31.9%), 54 type B dissections (40%) and 32 traumatic aortic injuries (23.7%), and other etiologies 4.4%. The overall mortality rate at 30 days was 18.5%, and proved higher in the RTAA group (27.9%). The mean actuarial survival rate was 67 ± 6% at 5 years. The postoperative stroke rate was 5.2%, and the paraplegia rate was 5.9%. Aortic reoperations proved necessary in 12 patients (9%). ConclusionsEmergency descending thoracic aortic diseases can be treated by endovascular techniques with optimal results and low morbidity and mortality — though the figures are slightly higher than in elective cases. This registry provides, for the first time, real information on the daily clinical practice of emergency TEVAR in Spain.

Anatomic feasibility of off-the-shelf thoracic single side-branched endograft in patients with blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury

ObjectiveThe advent of thoracic single side-branched endograft (TSSBE) has provided a treatment option to obviate the need for open cervical debranching of the left subclavian artery (LSA), thereby enabling total endovascular incorporation of the LSA during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). In a previous study of patients with type B aortic dissection who had required zone 2 TEVAR, the anatomic feasibility of this device was demonstrated to range from 28% to 35%, suggesting limited applicability of the currently available designs. The objectives of the present study were twofold: (1) to evaluate the anatomic feasibility of TSSBE in blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) patients who would require LSA revascularization; and (2) to describe the anatomic characteristics of the supra-aortic arch branches that could be used to improve future device design. MethodsA retrospective review was performed of BTAI patients who had undergone TEVAR at a single institution from November 2013 to October 2018. Preoperative computed tomography angiograms were analyzed using three-dimensional reconstruction to quantify the aortic diameter, distance and arc length between branch vessels, and the LSA diameter and length. We calculated the proportion of patients who had met all aortic and LSA anatomic requirements for TSSBE proposed by investigational protocols. We also assessed the effect of anatomic requirement modifications on device suitability. Finally, we assessed the local anatomic relationship between the supra-aortic branches. ResultsA total of 41 patients (63% men; median age, 39 years; range, 23-88 years; 68% normal aortic arch pattern, 32% bovine aortic arch pattern) with BTAI who had required TEVAR involving the LSA and were, thus, considered potential candidates for TSSBE were included. Of the 41 patients, 13 (32%; 7 with a bovine aortic arch and 6 with a normal aortic arch) had met all proposed aortic and LSA anatomic requirements for TSSBE. An appropriate aortic diameter, LSA diameter, and LSA length to its first branch were observed in 100%, 95%, and 66% of the patients, respectively. An insufficient distance between the arch branch vessels, observed in 41%, was the most common exclusionary criterion. The median clock-face position of the LSA was 12:00 (interquartile range, 30 minutes) in the normal arch group and 11:45 (interquartile range, 15 minutes) in the bovine arch group. ConclusionsDespite the numerous potential advantages of TSSBE, only 32% of patients with BTAI requiring LSA revascularization had met all the aortic and LSA anatomic requirements, justifying the need for additional designs. Better characterization and mapping of the aortic arch branches will improve future device design and application.

Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries: a retrospective cohort analysis of 2 decades of experience.

The aim of this study was to analyse and report the changes in the management of blunt traumatic aortic injuries (BTAIs) in a single centre during the last 2 decades. A retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with BTAI from January 1999 to January 2020 was performed. Data were collected from electronic/digitalized medical history records. Forty-six patients were included [median age 42.4 years (16-84 years), 71.7% males]. The predominant cause of BTAI was car accidents (54.5%, n = 24) and all patients presented with concomitant injuries (93% bone fractures, 77.8% abdominal and 62.2% pelvic injuries). Over 70% presented grade III or IV BTAI. Urgent repair was performed in 73.8% of patients (n = 31), with a median of 2.75 h between admission and repair. Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) was performed in 87% (n = 49), open surgery (OS) in 10.9% (n = 5) and conservative management in 2.1% (n = 1). Technical success was 82.6% (92.1% TEVAR, 79% OS). In-hospital mortality was 19.5% (17.5% TEVAR, 40% OS). Of these, 3 died from aortic-related causes. Seven (15.2%) required an early vascular reintervention. The median follow-up was 34 months (1-220 months), with 19% of early survivors having a follow-up of >10 years. Only 1 vascular reintervention was necessary during follow-up: secondary TEVAR due to acute graft thrombosis. Of the patients who survived the initial event, 6.7% died during follow-up, none from aortic-related causes. Even with all the described shortcomings, in our experience TEVAR for BTAI proved to be feasible and effective, with few complications and stable aortic reconstruction at mid-term follow-up. With the current technical expertise and wide availability of a variety of devices, it should be pursued as a first-line therapy in these challenging scenarios.

Chronic Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injuries

Blunt thoracic aortic injuries are potentially lethal. Those who survive may form an organised haematoma in the periadventitial space resulting in a pseudoaneurysm, which may be identified incidentally decades later. While the role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in acute settings has been established, its role in chronic cases is yet to be defined. We report three cases that were diagnosed incidentally six, nine and 18 years after the injury. Two were managed by TEVAR while the third declined intervention and is on annual follow-up. Patients with asymptomatic and stable pseudoaneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta should be offered surveillance versus TEVAR because the risk of rupture is not negligible, whilst taking into account the patient’s level of physical activity. These three cases highlight the importance of early diagnosis of aortic injuries in blunt trauma and its grading.

P.53 Ascending Aorta Diameter and Pulse Wave Velocity are Increased and Local Hemodynamic is Disrupted in Patients with Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury Treated by TEVAR

BackgroundThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is becoming the preferred treatment option to repair the proximal descending aorta after rupture following blunt traumatic injury. However, hemodynamic and mechanic implications of this intervention are poorly understood. Exploiting the possibilities of 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging, hemodynamics, stiffness and local dilation in the ascending aorta in patients following aortic repair by TEVAR are studied.MethodsFifteen apparently healthy individuals who underwent TEVAR implantation after traumatic descending aortic injury and 44 healthy volunteers (HV) underwent 4D flow-MRI. Ascending aorta pulse wave velocity was computed [1]. Moreover, at eight planes equally distributed in the ascending aorta systolic flow reversal ratio, i.e. relative amount of backward flow during systole, and in-plane rotational flow, measuring the strength of helical flow, were computed [2,3].ResultsTEVAR patients and HV did not differ in terms of age, sex, BSA and blood pressure (Table). However, compared to HV, TEVAR patients showed reduced in-plane rotational flow in the distal ascending aorta in patients with TEVAR and increased backward systolic flow in the whole ascending aorta (Figure). Patients with TEVAR had a stiffer ascending aorta, with pulse wave velocity higher compared control (7.8 ± 4.2 vs 5.3 ± 1.9, p = 0.004). Finally, aortic root and ascending aorta diameters were larger in TEVAR patients compared to HV (Table).ConclusionsThe implantation of TEVAR in apparently healthy individuals after traumatic rupture of the proximal descending aorta is associated with altered hemodynamics, higher stiffness and larger aortic diameter in the region proximal to the TEVAR.TableHealthy volunteersTEVAR patientspN4415Age [years]40 ± 1243 ± 100.392Sex [% male]66800.075Years from intervention [years]N/A10.3 ± 6.4N/ABody surface area [m2]1.87 ± 0.151.96 ± 0.230.088Systolic blood pressure [mmHg]127 ± 19131 ± 150.389Diastolic blood pressure [mmHg]70 ± 1174 ± 90.198Aortic root diameter [mm]31 ± 434 ± 40.026Ascending aorta diameter [mm]28 ± 432 ± 30.003Ascending aorta PWV [m/s]5.3 ± 1.97.8 ± 4.20.004FigureIn-plane rotational flow (IRF, left) and systolic flow reversal ratio (SFRR, right) in healthy volunteers (black) and TEVAR patients (yellow) in the proximal (planes 1 to 4) and distal (planes 5 to 8) ascending aorta. Stars show statistically-significant differences (p < 0.05).

Patients with blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury treated with TEVAR present increased flow dynamics alterations and pulse wave velocity: a 4D flow CMR study

Abstract Background Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is widely used for the treatment of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries. Aortic flow dynamics and mechanical implications of this intervention are poorly investigated and may be of particular interest in the long-term follow-up of these mostly young patients. Purpose To assess whether the presence of TEVAR in a cohort of otherwise healthy subjects was related to dilation of the proximal aorta or increase in aortic stiffness and flow alterations. Methods Nineteen patients who underwent TEVAR implantation after a traumatic injury of the thoracic descending aorta (DAo) (10.0±6.1 years from intervention) and 44 healthy volunteers (HV) underwent 4D flow CMR to compute ascending aorta (AAo) pulse wave velocity (PWV), a marker of aortic stiffness, systolic flow reversal ratio (SFRR), quantifying backward flow during systole and in-plane rotational flow (IRF), measuring in-plane strength of helical flow. IRF and SFRR were assessed at 20 planes between the sinotubular junction and the mid thoracic DAo. Aortic diameters were measured using double-oblique cine CMR. Results Patients with TEVAR and HV did not differ in age, sex, body surface area, blood pressure and DAo diameter distal to TEVAR (Table). However, TEVAR patients presented larger diameters at the sinus of Valsalva and AAo, increased AAo PWV and strong flow alterations: IRF was reduced from the distal AAo to the proximal DAo, while SFRR was increased in the whole thoracic aorta (Figure). Conclusions In patients with blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury treated with TEVAR the aorta proximal to TEVAR is dilated, stiffer and present potentially pathogenic flow conditions. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess whether these alterations have prognostic value and may improve clinical prevention and management of these patients. Figure 1. IRF and SFRR in healthy vs TEVAR Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This study has been funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PI19/01480). Guala A. received funding from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (IJC2018-037349-I).

Anatomic Feasibility of Off-the-Shelf Thoracic Single Side-Branched Endograft in Patients With Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury

The advent of thoracic single side-branched endograft (TSSBE) has provided a treatment option to obviate the need for open cervical debranching of the left subclavian artery (LSA), thereby enabling total endovascular incorporation of the LSA during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). In a previous study of patients with type B aortic dissection who had required zone 2 TEVAR, the anatomic feasibility of this device was demonstrated to range from 28% to 35%, suggesting limited applicability of the currently available designs. The objectives of the present study were twofold: (1) to evaluate the anatomic feasibility of TSSBE in blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) patients who would require LSA revascularization; and (2) to describe the anatomic characteristics of the supra-aortic arch branches that could be used to improve future device design. A retrospective review was performed of BTAI patients who had undergone TEVAR at a single institution from November 2013 to October 2018. Preoperative computed tomography angiograms were analyzed using three-dimensional reconstruction to quantify the aortic diameter, distance and arc length between branch vessels, and the LSA diameter and length. We calculated the proportion of patients who had metall aortic and LSA anatomic requirements for TSSBE proposed by investigational protocols. We also assessed the effect of anatomic requirement modifications on device suitability. Finally, we assessed the local anatomic relationship between the supra-aortic branches. A total of 41 patients (63% men; median age, 39years; range, 23-88years; 68% normal aortic arch pattern, 32% bovine aortic arch pattern) with BTAI who had required TEVAR involving the LSA and were, thus, considered potential candidates for TSSBE were included. Of the 41 patients, 13 (32%; 7 with a bovine aortic arch and 6 with a normal aortic arch) had metall proposed aortic and LSA anatomic requirements for TSSBE. An appropriate aortic diameter, LSA diameter, and LSA length to its first branch were observed in 100%, 95%, and 66% of the patients, respectively. An insufficient distance between the arch branch vessels, observed in 41%, was the most common exclusionary criterion. The median clock-face position of the LSA was 12:00 (interquartile range, 30minutes) in the normal arch group and 11:45 (interquartile range, 15minutes) in the bovine arch group. Despite the numerous potential advantages of TSSBE, only 32% of patients with BTAI requiring LSA revascularization had metall the aortic and LSA anatomic requirements, justifying the need for additional designs. Better characterization and mapping of the aortic arch branches will improve future device design and application.

Anatomic Feasibility of Off-the-shelf Thoracic Single Side-branched Endograft in Patients With Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury

The advent of thoracic single side-branched endograft (TSSBE) provides a treatment option to obviate the need for open cervical debranching of the left subclavian artery (LSA), thereby enabling total endovascular incorporation of the LSA during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). In a previous study in patients with type B aortic dissection who required zone 2 TEVAR, anatomic feasibility of this device has been demonstrated to range between 28% and 35%, suggesting limited applicability of currently available designs. The objective of this study was twofold: (1) to evaluate the anatomic feasibility of TSSBE in an unselected population of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury (BTTAI) patients who would require LSA revascularization; and (2) to describe the anatomic characteristics of the aortic arch branches that can be used to improve future device design. A retrospective review was performed on BTTAI patients who underwent TEVAR at a single institution between November 2013 and October 2018. Preoperative computed tomography angiography images were analyzed using three-dimensional reconstruction to quantify aortic diameter, distance and arc length between branch vessels, and target side branch vessel diameter and length. We calculated the percentage of patients that met all anatomic requirements for TSSBE proposed by investigational protocols that have been published, and plotted each branch vessel in relation to the left common carotid artery in cases of normal aortic arch and the innominate artery in cases of bovine aortic arch. There were 41 patients (63% men; median age, 39 years [range, 23-88 years]; 68% normal aortic arch pattern, 32% bovine aortic arch pattern) with BTTAI considered potential candidates for TSSBE. Of these, 13 (7 bovine aortic arch, 6 normal aortic arch; 31.7%) met all proposed anatomic requirements for TSSBE: appropriate aortic diameter, LSA diameter, and LSA length to its first branch were observed in 100%, 95%, 66% of the patients, respectively. Insufficient distance between arch branch vessels, observed in 41%, was the most common exclusionary criterion. Figs 1 and 2 depict the absolute positions of individual branch vessels relative to the left common carotid artery and to the innominate artery in the 0 axis, respectively. Despite numerous potential advantages of TSSBE, only 32% of patients with BTTAI requiring LSA revascularization met all the anatomic requirements, justifying the need for additional designs. Improved characterization and mapping of the aortic arch branches will improve future device design and application.Fig 2View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

A multicenter study of emergency endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta: indications and outcomes.

Endovascular techniques have become an essential tool for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease (thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair [TEVAR]). The aim is to analyze the indications and outcomes of emergency TEVAR at national level in relation to elective surgery. A retrospective multicenter registry of patients with descending thoracic aortic disease treated on an emergency basis using endovascular techniques between 2012-2016, in 11 clinical units. 1) Ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms; 2) Blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury; and 3) Complicated acute type B aortic dissections (TBADc). Patient mortality, survival and reoperation rate. Demographic data, cardiovascular risk factors, specific data by indication, technical resources and postoperative complications. A total of 135 urgent TEVARs were included (111 men, mean age 60.4 ± 16.3 years): 43 ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms (31.9%), 54 type B dissections (40%) and 32 traumatic aortic injuries (23.7%), and other etiologies 4.4%. The overall mortality rate at 30 days was 18.5%, and proved higher in the ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms group (27.9%). The mean actuarial survival rate was 67± 6% at 5 years. The postoperative stroke rate was 5.2%, and the paraplegia rate was 5.9%. Aortic reoperations proved necessary in 12 patients (9%). Emergency descending thoracic aortic diseases can be treated by endovascular techniques with optimal results and low morbidity and mortality - though the figures are slightly higher than in elective cases. This registry provides, for the first time, real information on the daily clinical practice of emergency TEVAR in Spain.

Hybrid open and endovascular repair of a blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury in a 7 year old boy

We describe a 7-year-old boy who sustained a blunt thoracic aortic injury following a rollover motor vehicle crash where the vehicle fell 200 feet down an embankment. The chest x-ray on arrival showed widening of the superior mediastinum, a left-sided hemothorax, and first rib fracture. The screening CTA of the chest revealed bilateral pulmonary contusions, a large left hemothorax, and evidence of aortic injury with active contrast extravasation. The patient was intubated due to respiratory distress and had a left chest tube placed. The patient became hypotensive with greater than 1.5 L of blood from the chest tube, so a resuscitative thoracotomy was performed. Bleeding was controlled with a sponge stick initially and definitively with a Satinsky vascular clamp. Next the patient was transported to the hybrid OR at the adjacent adult hospital with an open chest for endovascular graft placement. The patient was admitted to the PICU post-operatively, transferred to the floor on POD 4, and discharged home on POD 9. Aortic injury after blunt trauma in pre-adolescent children is uncommon and often fatal. Endovascular repair of traumatic thoracic aortic injury in adults is currently the standard of care, but there is a paucity of clinical data to guide management of these types of injuries in pediatric patients.

The effect of TEVAR for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury on maximal aortic diameter: Mid- and long-term outcome.

Objective Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become the standard of care for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI). Long-term effects of TEVAR on the aortic diameter are not well studied. This study evaluates the effect of TEVAR for BTAI on the aortic diameter in mid- and long-term follow-up. Methods All patients treated with TEVAR for BTAI between August 2000 and May 2016 were included. Maximum aortic diameter was measured at four predetermined thoracic aortic levels in the preoperative and first postoperative CT angiography (CTa) and in the last control CTa or MR angiography: 1 cm proximal (D1) and 1 cm distal to the left subclavian artery (D2), 3 cm distal to the left subclavian artery (D3) and 3 cm proximal to the celiac trunk (D4). Results A total of 27 patients (20 men, mean age 40 years (±17.55) were included. Mean follow-up time was 90 months (±48.36)). No re-interventions were needed. Mean growth of aortic diameter at level D1, D2, D3 and D4 was 0.22 mm ± 3.66, 1.79 mm ± 3.82, 0.73 mm ± 4.18 and –1.06 mm ± 2.82, respectively, when comparing last follow-up to the preoperative imaging without any statistical significant differences. When comparing the preoperative diameter with the first postoperative CT, only a statistical significant growth of 2.81 mm ± 2.69 was seen at level of D2 ( p &lt; 0.05) Conclusion During mid- to long-term follow-up, a temporary significant increase of the maximum aortic diameter was seen at level D2 in the direct postoperative phase This increase was not associated with clinical events and suggests long-term efficacy of TEVAR after BTAI.